The xenobots.

Ray Kurzweil said this was good so I guess it must be good.

RT:

Miniscule biological machines developed by scientists from the cells of frogs – commonly referred to as Xenobots – can now self-replicate, according to a new scientific report.

The Xenobots were made public in a report last year, which suggested the self-repairing technology could be used to replace degradable materials such as concrete, steel, and plastic. Then, in March, it was revealed that the organisms had been improved to be able to remember their surroundings and assemble into a single swarm.

Now, an article published in the PNAS journal on Monday suggests that the Xenobots are able to self-replicate.

Joshua Bongard, one of the co-authors of the new report, claimed that “with the right design” the organisms “will spontaneously self-replicate,” and proposed that the technology could be used to tackle future pandemics and speed up vaccine production.

Sam Kriegman, a lead author of the study, described the process as an entirely new form of self-replicating, noting that “no animal or plant known to science replicates in this way.” The Xenobots were conditioned to procreate by a supercomputer which came up with just the right shape of ideal ‘parents’ after months of laboring at the task, the researcher said. Even though the design, which bears some similarity to Pac-Man, looked counter-intuitive and too “simple,” it proved to be extremely progenitive.

You need these robots inside of your body, just like you need these vaccines.

I wonder if the tiny robots are already in the vaccines?

They would do that, you know.

Inject you with something and then come out and say “we have this great new thing we’re going to inject you with – oh, in fact, we already injected you with it!”

“There! A stellar nursery! Now give me money.”

While people are feeling down about not having a job and being forced to remain in their houses, “scientists” are getting paid for saying that stellar nurseries may be raising young Earth-like planets.

Daily Mail:

The ‘odds are in favour’ of finding other young Earth-like planets, as experts have found that stellar nurseries contain more Sun-like stars than expected.

Experts from Sheffield studied groups of young stars in the Milky way to determine if they were typical when compared to other star-forming regions in the universe.

They then investigated whether the number of various stars in each group increased the chances of finding ‘magma ocean planets’ — which are like ‘baby’ Earths.

The findings may help scientists understand whether stars form in the same way throughout the universe  — and also shed light on how rocky, Earth-like worlds form.

This is the kind of content that the current system is set up to produce. These people enjoy some kind of elevated status where they are worshiped as SCIENTISTS despite mumbling incoherently about things they imagine may be happening in the sky, and no one appears to be calling them out on the absolute garbage that they “produce.”

And that is a problem, because for the same reason that people don’t question this space and galaxies stupidity, people are not questioning the insane graphs and DOOM predictions presented by the government when talking about coronavirus and the lockdown.

Coronavirus is only as dangerous as the flu, the lockdown was useless, and only old people die from the virus. Yet people are still not angry enough to demand the government and its experts explain what on Earth are they basing their actions on.

People are angry enough about some dead jogger though.

Interstellar visitor “Oumumua” is actually a space phallus made out of ice, according to SCIENCE.

I like to read what “scientists” and “researchers” say about space, galaxies, the universe, planets, and all things extraterrestrial because most of the time, it is absurd, absolute garbage way below the level of theories that random internet posters write every day all over the world — and that paints an accurate picture of the current state of SCIENCE.

The same SCIENCE that brought you “coronavirus is dangerous” and “the weather should always be exactly the same” is now presenting “projectile-shaped mega space objects made of ice are heading towards our solar system.”

Daily Mail:

The interstellar visitor named Oumumua may be made up entirely of hydrogen ice, something rarely seen in nature, according to scientists.

The ‘weird object’ was first discovered in 2017, sparking speculation over its origin and make-up, with theories ranging from a comet to a cigar shaped spaceship.

Yale astronomers developed a theory that aimed to explain the unusual properties shown by Oumuamua – they found it was effectively a ‘hydrogen iceberg’.

The team say this solid form of hydrogen seen flying through space is a ‘new kind of object’ but there will be more showing up in the solar system in the future.

Yes, just like the coronavirus “pandemic” appeared out of nowhere and experts are already talking as if there’ll be multiple future “pandemics,” this Oumuwhatever object appeared out of nowhere and there’ll be more showing up soon.

As soon as a once-in-a-lifetime unprecedented thing happens at random, you can bet that it is going to happen more and more.

It makes complete sense.

Oumumua has now passed beyond Saturn’s orbit but will take another 10,000 years before it leaves the solar system for its next interstellar destination.

Lead author Darryl Seligman, now at the University of Chicago, said the 900ft long object has several unusual properties including varying rapidly in brightness.

He said this suggested it was either saucer shaped or cigar shaped.

The team say it accelerated in a fashion similar to comet but showed no evidence of emitting gas or the billows of dust normally seen trailing a comet.

Seligman and co-author Gregory Laughlin say ‘Oumuamua’s behavior can be explained if it is composed of hydrogen ice.’ 

Great insight, Mr. Authors. I’m glad that you’re both getting paid for daydreaming about shiny dots in the sky while most of the rest of the people in the West are losing their jobs and their minds while watching both their future and their cities burning in the name of some dead jogger.

Or was it because of some virus? Or both?

Who knows. It doesn’t matter anyway. These people are going to keep getting paid for writing about projectile-shaped space objects made out of ice while their colleagues keep getting paid for pumping out one deranged death rate projection for the flu after the other, because this is what the system is set up to produce: smoke and mirrors.

The actual facts and the actual scientific data obtained through the actual application of the scientific method are being ignored by our rulers, and the real scientists who dare to bring attention to that fact are being silenced.

Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live: And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?

I concur with the historians such as Herbert Butterfield, who believed that the scientific revolution occurring between the approximate dates of 1660-1715 was the most significant transition in the history of the European people. Prior to the scientific revolution, the religious debate had been between Christian sects, the Protestant side claiming the Catholics were insufficiently scriptural and the Catholic side claiming the Protestants were breaking up the hierarchical system which Christ had left for the benefit of mankind. But that internecine warfare between Christians was a petty squabble in comparison to the real conflict between the religion of science/nature and the religion of the God-Man. Was the natural world, which could be dissected and examined, the real world or was it only the outward manifestation of a spiritual world created by a God who took flesh and dwelt among us in the person of Jesus Christ? From that time on, the period of the scientific revolution, the war began. The post-Christian Europeans, the men whose ancestors heard and believed, reared their ugly heads and rejected Christ for the natural world revealed by science. The pseudo-intellectual verbiage of Voltaire and Rousseau and the pseudo-poetical garbage of Byron and Shelly all amounted to one naturalistic attack on Christ’s reign of charity. What kind of man prefers impersonal nature to the Christ who presides over and above nature? What kind of man works with might and main to destroy the incorporate union between God and the Europeans? The answer: a man who has given his soul to Satan.

The Christian churches’ reaction to the scientific revolution was always one of compromise, but compromise on one side, the Christian side, and never on the side of science. Science kept claiming more and more of the spiritual realm until there was virtually no spiritual realm left in the churches. By the latter half of the 20^th century the church men merely gave the new natural religion with the sacred negro as its focal point their blessing and begged leave to hold on to the old buildings and their tax-exempt status.

Nowhere was the schism between atheistic science and Christianity more pronounced than in France of the 1700’s. The French Revolution was the manifestation of that schism. Only Burke saw the spirit behind the French Revolution. He knew that the battle was Christian Europe against a new utopian religion based on science, naturalism, and reason. Halfway-house Christians failed to see the satanic nature of the new religion while the liberals such as Dr. Price and Priestly openly followed the new philosophy of nature and reason in which Christian monarchs and the Christian faith were regulated to the garbage heap of history.

The poison took a long time to spread, and there were Christian counter-attacks. In the late 18^th century Walter Scott took up the cudgels for true romance, the romance of the Christian faith, and in the 19^th century the Christian counter-revolution to utopian naturalism was even stronger. There was Scott, who bridged the latter half of the 18^thcentury and the early half of the 19^th century, and there was Austen, Dickens, Tennyson, Browning, Thomas Hughes, Ian Maclaren, Fyodor Dostoyevsky, and Thomas Nelson Page, to name a few. Those authors articulated a faith that was still alive in the hearts and souls of the European people. A clean, pure faith still existed as something more than a shadow on the wall that fades from sight as soon as you try to get near to it to ascertain its reality.

By the latter part of the 20^th century and the beginning of t he 21^st century, the forces of scientific naturalism had gained total ascendancy over the European people and made Christianity an irrelevancy to the great majority of Europeans and a thing of ridicule to the intelligentsia. If the Christian faith is false, then its irrelevancy and its lack of adherents in positions of leadership is not a tragedy. But has the Christian faith been proven false? Why do Newton’s laws of motion or Einstein’s theory of relativity make Christ’s resurrection from the dead an impossibility? It is because Christ’s incarnation and resurrection contradict what we know, from a scientific standpoint, about what is natural. It is natural that we die and we rot; that is way of nature. Has anyone ever observed a dead man rise? There does not seem to be any empirical, scientific evidence of such a phenomenon. But there was once a time – we were very young – when we did not regard the natural world as the sum total of existence. Buried in the mists of time is a people who saw a different reality. They looked on the natural world as a pale mirror of a greater spiritual world that was within. Which brings us back to our present reality, the reality of the maniacal hatred of the liberal technocrats and the black savages for the white race. A ‘this world only’ kingdom of the negro cannot be built if Europeans love their own kind with a love that passeth the understanding of the scientific, empirical mind. Such a love can withstand the onslaughts of the liberal technocrats and the colored barbarians. But if you kill the Europeans’ feeling of pietas by redirecting it to a universalist compost heap, you will have effectively killed the Europeans, and by doing so you will keep the dear Christ out and the negro in.

There are still Christian churches everywhere, and the Christ story is told at Christmas and Easter. But this new ‘Churchianity’ is a naturalized Christianity. Christ is a quasi-divine, mythic figure to the grazers and a second-class social worker to the liberals. We can’t love such a Christ as the true God because He is not a God who enters human hearts. Our heart belongs to our kith and kin; if a universalist Pied Piper tells us to leave our kith and kin for his universalist Candy Land, we shall not heed him, because such a Pied Piper god cannot be the true God. The God of our people, the people of the European mists, is Christ the redeemer, not Christ the Pied Piper of universalism or a fusion of Carl Jung and Nelson Mandela.

The liberal and the neo-pagan tell us that Christ be not risen, so let’s redefine Him as a negrophile (so says the liberal), or let’s jettison Him (so says the neo-pagan). But the halfway-house Christians tell us something different. They want a happy blending of negro-worshipping liberalism and Christ the Redeemer Christianity. What is wrong with that? What does race matter so long as we worship the Lord? It matters because our race is our spiritual backbone, and without it we cannot stand upright for long. My grandfather, born in the latter half of the 19^th century, was an old school European. He grew up in a small, provincial, coal town where everyone was white and held what would now be considered racist opinions. My grandfather was not deceived during the 1960s by the ‘new, improved’ Christianity that was being spouted from the pulpit. His faith remained fundamental and provincially racist in that he did not equate faith in Christ with race-mixing and white genocide.(1)

My father was decidedly more liberal than my grandfather. He considered himself a liberal for most of his life. He loved his father but always denigrated his father’s racism and his Christian provincialism. Toward the end of his life, my father, having accepted the fusion of Babylon and Christianity, started to revert back to his father’s faith. The cause? He witnessed the implementation of the last phase of Babylonian Christianity, which starts with race-mixing, proceeds to feminism, and ends with the acceptance of homosexuality. That last phase of the new Christianity was too much for my father. He started using ‘liberal’ as a pejorative term and taking seriously the ‘mythic’ parts of the Bible that he had formerly scoffed at. By the end of his long life, he believed as his father believed. In my view, from inside and from outside that father-son relationship, it was my grandfather’s racial backbone, his refusal to betray his race, that gave my father a spiritual home to return to. My father saw no nebulous, remote god of Liberaldom at his deathbed, he saw the European Christ, the Son of the living God.

When my father was a young boy, he was bitten by a rattlesnake. My grandfather took him in his arms and ran with him five miles to the hospital over rough terrain so that the medical staff could administer anti-venom to save his life. And so it happened again at the latter stage of my father’s life. His father took him in his arms and placed him at the foot of the cross so that Christ could take all the liberal venom from his soul and envelope him in His arms. The faith of our fathers, their fidelity to their own people, in and through Jesus Christ, is what sustains the Church of Christ here on earth. God bless the fathers who protect their racial hearth fires. They are the sentinels of the Lord, the true Europeans. +

_______________________________________

(1) An old folk tale, which I’ll paraphrase from memory, illustrates the faith of our ancestors who stayed close to their racial hearth fire:

A man dies, along with his beloved dog. He approaches a gate to the next world, and the gate keeper tells him the gate leads to heaven. “You can come in,” the gatekeeper tells him, “but your dog can’t come in.”

“Then I reckon I won’t come in,” the man replies. “What kind of heaven is it where a man has to leave his best friend behind?”

The man proceeds down the road until he comes to another gate. At this gate the man is told that he and his dog are welcome, “because this gate is the gate to heaven.”

“Then why do you let those other people claim their gate is the heavenly gate?”

“Because they help us filter out the bad ones. We don’t want the type of men who would betray their best friend.”

If someone, no matter whether a church man, a teacher, or a psychiatrist, tells us in order to become more Christian, more humane, or more wise, we must abandon the people of our own race, then they are from the devil. Stay close to the faith of our fathers, loving and hating with all your heart.