Rush Limbaugh has died.

Up until this morning, he was probably the most influential man alive. Despite his direct influence waning, he is a man who shaped an entire generation of conservative thought, for better and worse.

He was an American icon, he was a genius, he was a sellout and a glutton who wasn’t willing to do the right thing when it was hard.

As an adult reflecting on my childhood, I’ve come to believe that much of my brain’s wiring was influenced by Rush Limbaugh. I try to keep personal matters off of this site as much as possible, because it doesn’t matter who we are, what matters is our plan. But I have said before that as a child, I spent a lot of time with my grandmother.

My grandfather died very young, not long after sixty. Grandma had the radio on all the time, in the house and car, and back then, it seemed like Rush Limbaugh was on all day long.

Here’s an archive show from 1990. Just to give you an idea of what was going on in the background when my brain formed.

People aren’t really aware now, but in the Bill Clinton years, Limbaugh was basically a proto Alex Jones. He would talk about the New World Order conspiracy to build a global government, freemasonry, and communism being a Jewish conspiracy. He would mix that with the standard pre-William Buckley type conservative views on race and sex.

In the early 2000s, he was having some personal and professional problems, and he got the opportunity to sell out and promote those wars that George W. Bush did for the Jewish Lobby.

Even when Rush was selling out, the thing that he was preaching would have been good if it wasn’t a big scam. That is to say, it wasn’t like Charlie Kirk promoting gay anal sex with men in Africa and saying that liberals are the real homophobes. He was not polluting values in the way that modern “conservatives” do, he was simply lying. There is a qualitative difference there, and the record should show that. Rush never promoted homosexuality, feminism, or race mixing. He never tried to change traditional American values, he just used traditional American values to push a bizarre Jewish agenda.

The Bush Wars were sold as some sequel to the Crusades, and as a Liam Neeson style revenge fantasy against evil towel-headed beard men. If it was real, it would have been awesome.

But, it was not real. And now that he is dead, he will be forever remembered as someone who told lies to people who trusted him.

Start at 5:25 on this clip from an interview that was recorded in 1988, when I was four years old.

He says: “Jewish Lobby.”

He says: “You can say ‘Jewish Lobby’ anywhere but New York, and nobody will notice.”

That’s the world of American conservatism that he inherited and became the standard bearer of. It was a culture where you could say “Jew.” And at his death, if you say “Jewish Lobby,” people do a lot more than notice.

Rush was always fat. Eventually, that fatness polluted his soul, and he used his genius for evil.

For a while in the early 2000s, he wasn’t doing political talk radio. In 2003, he briefly did spots talk on ESPN, and he was probably the first person to be canceled for racism.

He said:

I don’t think he’s been that good from the get-go. I think what we’ve had here is a little social concern in the NFL. I think the media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well. They’re interested in black coaches and black quarterbacks doing well. I think there’s a little hope invested in McNabb and he got a lot of credit for the performance of his team that he really didn’t deserve. The defense carried this team.

That was in 2003. He lost a bad job for saying something true.

He would soon get a good job for saying something false.

He went back to political talk, and started shilling these wars.

But this is the headline on HuffPo:

The Jews are not grateful.

It is impossible to imagine what the world would have been like without him. It’s almost certain that naturally conservative people would not have been so gung-ho about the wars. What he did was work a kind of voodoo on people, and transfer the fear of communism and the trauma of the 911 attacks into a paranoid fantasy that enveloped the minds of the average white working and middle class American.

He bought the ticket and took the ride. Or rather the reverse. He took the ticket-money and got ridden around like a donkey by a bunch of Jews. These Jews were doing massive wars, and he sold them. This man convinced people that Iraq – a third world country where people were riding camels through the streets of the downtown of the capital city – was going to invade America.

Imagine selling that idea. You have to be a genius to be able to get people to believe something so moronic. There was a Philip K. Dick style surrealism to this man’s voice being in everyone’s head through the Bush years, preaching a paranoid delusion that served the interests of an alien ruling class.

The human brain does not have a defense mechanism against radio. If a man is good enough at it, he can make people’s subconscious minds believe that his words are their own thoughts. Rush Limbaugh was the best there ever was.

He was a genius, turned evil by the sin of gluttony. He is survived by four wives. He was humiliated for illegal Viagra while on a sex tourist vacation in the Caribbean. He was addicted to pills. He was a typical loud, messy fat person, who happened to be a genius capable of hypnotizing tens of millions of Americans into thinking Arabs were going to ride camels across the Atlantic Ocean and force us all to live under Sharia Law, which by his telling, was basically the exact same thing as communism – somehow.

For me personally, he was something different, of course. Every cultural figure has an effect on both the culture, and on every individual in the culture, and these are going to be different things. When you’re a child, a droning background noise of someone ranting is going to do even more extreme things to your brain. I cannot even imagine the number of hours I must have absorbed of Rush Limbaugh when my brain was forming. I like the way my brain has formed.

Go read the Wikipedia list of his “views.” He was saying “sexual consent” is a fantasy hoax up until this morning. He was correct on all of the core issues. He puts Breitbart to shame. There was no apology for racism or sexism or “homophobia.” There was a lot of good in Rush Limbaugh, and that is why he is such a truly tragic figure.

What we must learn is that the wages of sin is death. Everyone dies, but I can’t stress the importance of this enough: what you do changes the world. Everyone changes the world, by doing whatever they do, and whatever they don’t do.

Rush is dead now, and it’s up to God to judge his soul. But it’s my job to judge his life. I should be able to write a glowing review of the life of a man who was a right-wing icon of my country. I can’t write a glowing review of this man’s life because he let his sin swallow him up. He was a glutton who wanted comfortable rides and big buffets and buckets of pills and big fake titty hookers jiggling around. He was basically a Nero type figure, fiddling around while the country burned.

When I was four years old, you could say “Jewish lobby” everywhere in America, except New York, and no one would think anything of it. Rush Limbaugh said AIDS was a hoax and that black people were stupid, but if he would have kept saying the one thing that needed to be said – “Jewish lobby” – his life would have become a lot less comfortable. It no longer would have been a life for a fat man bobbing around on pills. He’d have had to have lost that weight for all the ducking and dodging he’d have to be doing, and dumped the pills for threat they’d dull his reflexes. He wouldn’t be able to roll up to the buffet in a limousine.

Let’s learn a lesson:

You should live your life as if everything you do is going to be written in your obituary.

You’re going to die some day, but the choices you make will shape eternal reality. Some day, that sky is going to open up, the light is going to shine on all of us, and the dust will settle. Everyone will be forced to see things as they are. History will not be kind to Rush Limbaugh.

We all sin. But we must recognize it as sin, and not let the sin become who we are. When you sin, you must recognize it as sin, internalize the recognition of it as sin, and don’t ever let the sin overtake you. Don’t ever be defined by the sin. Don’t ever get fat and don’t ever shill for the Jews and their lies for the sake of comfort.

God will forgive a lot. God will forgive anything, in fact, save for one thing: He will not forgive a failure to ask to be forgiven.

Today America mourns the death of Rush Limbaugh. And today Rush Limbaugh mourns the discovery that in Hell, the pills make the pain worse, the hookers are all trannies, and the buffets are riddled with maggots.

As I have told you, the purpose of the Texas election lawsuit was not to win, but to set a framework for secession.

It was set up perfectly to make the statement that if the suit was rejected, it would mean that in the eyes of Texas, the federal government is no longer a legitimate entity.

It was also designed to allow for other states to sign on – and a total of 18 states did sign on.

This is the map:

This suit created a situation where Republican states were issuing an ultimatum to the feds.

On Friday, the suit was unceremoniously rejected by the Supreme Court.

Donald Trump was also a signatory to the suit, and this was his last real opportunity to get a hearing before the Supreme Court before the electoral college casts their votes on Monday.

And now: guess what the Texas Republican Party is calling for.

A statement issued by Texas GOP Chairman Allen West in response to the court’s decision says: “Perhaps law-abiding states should bond together and form a union of states that will abide by the Constitution.”

Here’s the first thing to process and to rejoice in: this is no longer an Andrew Anglin fringe fantasy. This is now a part of the mainstream conversation, having been introduced by a major political institution. The issue is now on the table. That is a massive step in the right direction.

Frankly, I didn’t expect this to come together so easily.

All we need now is for Donald Trump to sign on, and we can start demanding referendums.

Of course, we don’t have to have Donald Trump on board, but that would make it a lot easier. I don’t see any reason he wouldn’t support it. He’s going to end up in prison, or have to flee the country, if he is removed from office by this coup.

It’s not going to be easy with or without Donald Trump, and I’m actually a bit suspicious about the fact that the Texas GOP was so quick to call for it.

However: I’m frankly not totally clear on which financial interests would be behind this, but I would say that the Texas oil industry would massively benefit from it, and they’re obviously the primary local financial interest attached to the Texas GOP. Exxon Mobile is the second biggest company in the United States.

Presumably, virtually every other domestic industry operating in the targeted states would be supportive of secession, if all things were equal. Of course, all things are not equal – both the tech industry and the entertainment media industry are run by ideological lunatics and Jews, and this is going to be the case for various other big business interests across America.

Corporate politics are just not something that I’m an expert in. But they are very important here, because the very first question is going to be: where is the money going to come from?

Will Rush Limbaugh Endorse?

On Wednesday, Rush Limbaugh said that we are “trending toward secession.” He highlighted the cultural gap between actual America and the coasts, and said that people in his circles are increasingly beginning to mutter about secession.

(Someone maybe got a vague shoutout in the form of “bloggers – I can’t think of names right now.”)

He said: “I haven’t made up my mind.”

On Friday, after the media claimed that he was “calling for” secession, he said that he hasn’t called for secession, that he had simply said that things are “trending in that direction.” (This is true. He didn’t call for it and explicitly said that he is still thinking about it.)

At the end of this clarification, he said that he “probably wouldn’t” advocate secession.

I get the feeling that he actually would. I definitely get the feeling that if there was a movement supporting it, he would not go out there and oppose it. He said that his position has always been that we should create awareness and vote for change. But we tried that already, and it didn’t work. (Rush has been hard on the fraud, unlike Tucker.)

Rush is one of the big figures I have listed as someone who would be a big help. The other major one is Joe Rogan. I’ve more or less given up on Tucker Carlson, frankly. He could end up surprising us all, but right now, I feel betrayed. I feel that I’ve been cucked by the Tuck.

Your Job

If there wasn’t money coming from somewhere, then I don’t think the GOP’s statement would be calling for secession. But I do not have a clear picture of how that all lines up. However, that is something that is out of our hands, whatever the situation is, and so we’re required to focus on things that are in our hands. The only thing that is in our hands, actually, is agitation.

As I said from the beginning, as I said on November 6, the long-term goal of opposing the election fraud was to set us up for a secession movement. As I have said: even if Trump were to win, we would want secession. There is an unbridgeable philosophical gap, buffered by an increasingly large genetic black hole, separating the American people, and there is no reality in which we can come to terms with one another.

Even if you were to remove all of the Jews from America tomorrow, you would have an army of white people – women in particular – who have gone all in on a lunatic belief system, and you would have this ever-expanding blob of nonwhites, stretching out through our society like gray goo. There is no conceivable reconciliation here. Either one side is going to have to crush the other side, or there is going to have to be separation.

What Donald Trump has done is highlight the fact that these differences are irreconcilable. That means that we can make this case to the boomers. This election theft has caused them to lose all faith in the system. They are ready to go. We need to continue these rallies, we need to get the people aware of the fact that this is on the table. The biggest thing is simply talking about it, and obviously, I’m the main figure promoting this and I am now totally censored, and incapable of reaching the masses of people, so I rely on intelligent people to come here and read this site and spread the memes themselves.

But there is another very important thing that We the People can do, and it is something that I’m good at doing and that Nick Fuentes is good at doing: we need keep the movement from being hijacked.

I’ve listed the big three that I wanted to support the movement: Rush Limbaugh, Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson. I think we’re going to get two of those three, and there are a handful of other relevant figures that could go either way.

But more important than getting certain influencers on board is to keep certain influencers off-board. The thing that we absolutely do not want is to allow scum to come in and sabotage us by pretending to support us. We do not need any Charlie Kirks or MILOs. Weird people in general are something we do not need. When the winds start blowing in the secession direction, there are going to be a lot of people trying to stand up and put themselves at the front of things, like there were with every other destroyed right-wing movement.

The Tea Party was famously destroyed by infiltrators. I would say that Phase Two of the Trump movement itself was destroyed by infiltrators. If Charlie Kirk hadn’t been at the center of the lobbying influence circle of the Trump Administration, Trump likely would have made internet censorship a main issue in 2017, which ultimately would have made the coronavirus hoax impossible, which would have meant no vote by mail, which would have meant a landslide election win.

Charlie Kirk, being a figurehead of various business interests and just Jews generally, is a bad actor who infiltrated the movement. Notably, the reason he was able to do this is that the political capital of the Alt-Right was exploded by another bad actor, Richard Spencer, who first solicited Nazi salutes on camera (“Heilgate”), and then organized Charlottesville. People forget this: the Alt-Right was mainstream in 2016, and we had people who were on the transition team before Heilgate, and they were all rooted out because of that cute little event.

I know things about this that I can’t say, but you surely do not know how good things could have been in terms of our people having the ear of the president. We wouldn’t have been able to convince Trump to bulldoze Holocaust museums, but at the very least, we would have been able to get him to address the censorship issue with the vigor he is now addressing it with.

All of this is to say: a single bad actor allowed to act with impunity can destroy the good work of thousands of men, and this fact needs to be right in the front of all of our brains as we move into this new phase.

Nick Fuentes must be the unquestioned figurehead of the movement. He should make the decisions, but all of us need to be on the lookout for bad actors. I don’t think Charlie Kirk himself is likely to actually show up, but people from his movement will show up, and people like him will show up.

Tell People

Because of the censorship, we are largely reduced to word of mouth. But word of mouth was always going to be more powerful than the internet, as someone talking to you in real life is always going to be more powerful than reading something.

Each of you need to do as much as you can to inform other people of this agenda. I’m telling you as a matter of fact: the people are finally ready to hear it. I’ve not heard one single boomer say this is a bad idea. In fact, when they hear it, they pause, and say: “I’ve never thought of that before. That is a really good idea.”

It makes basic sense to people, and it is not too fantastical to seem unachievable.

The basic groundwork is a bunch of people talking about secession. That is necessary for anything to move forward.

Don’t underestimate the power you have in simply talking to your friends and influential local people about this. Soon, I’m going to put together a list of bulleted-up talking points that will work in conversations with different types of people who have different immediate concerns (obviously the concerns of people in blue and purple states are going to be bigger, but their support is also important).

The other thing that we have to do is keep the energy levels high. Trump being involved would be the best way to do that, because he always delivers the energy. But either way, we need to keep the energy high. It’s unfortunate that we’re going into the coldest months right at this crucial juncture, but we need to continue to be on the street as much as possible.

Most importantly of all: trust the plan.

We’ve got an event today in Washington, D.C., which we will be livestreaming at 12 noon EST. 

Rush!

Penn Live:

Rush Limbaugh says his stage 4 lung cancer has progressed and told listeners that it’s “terminal.”

The conservative radio host said his most recent scans “did show some progression of cancer” on his nationally syndicated show Monday.

“It’s not dramatic, but it is the wrong direction,” he said.

Limbaugh, 69, was diagnosed with lung cancer in February and has missed several shows for treatment.

According to Fox News, his treatment program had been adjusted with chemotherapy drugs to stop the growth and had made it “manageable,” but Limbaugh and his doctors recognized it could “come back because it is cancer. It eventually outsmarts pretty much everything you throw at it.”

“It’s tough to realize that the days where I do not think I’m under a death sentence are over,” Limbaugh said Monday. “Now, we all are, is the point. We all know that we’re going to die at some point, but when you have a terminal disease diagnosis that has a time frame to it, then that puts a different psychological and even physical awareness to it.”

Limbaugh has hosted “The Rush Limbaugh Show,” syndicated nationally and heard locally on NewsRadio 570 WSYR in Syracuse, for more than 30 years. He received the Presidential Medal of Freedom at President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address in February.

He’s been around since I was a kid, this guy.

Probably, listening to him constantly in the background on my grandma’s radio growing up had some effect on my personal development.

He was better than the Jews.

Related: Censorship Machine is Cracking Down on “Joe and the Hoe” Memes!

But, you know – people do die. It’s part of life. He smoked, as most people who talk a lot do, and you eventually die from that. 70 is a good run, and I doubt anyone really wants to live longer than that.

The first thing I thought when I saw the headline: will he finally talk about Jews?

He literally has nothing left to lose.

Why not just say “Jews are trying to exterminate white Christians”?

Surely, that would be good for his legacy, assuming we win this war.

If we don’t win this war, he’s going to be remembered as a Nazi either way, and it won’t matter if he said “Jew.”

I think he probably won’t say it.

But I hope he surprises me.

Trump gave him a tribute on Fox and Friends this morning.

Rush Limbaugh continues to kill his own cancer using the sheer power of his inconceivable boomerist powers.

Rush is not only peak boomer – aside from the music, he’s the single thing of value that the boomers ever produced.

RT:

Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh’s “sexist” riff on Democratic VP candidate Kamala Harris’ past relationship with a powerful older politician has liberals outraged and conservatives rolling their eyes.

In his Friday broadcast, Limbaugh brought up the NBA’s dismissal of a freelance photographer who had posted a mock campaign ad of Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden with Harris captioned ‘Joe and the Hoe’ on Facebook.

Noting the photographer was given the boot over a “sexist Facebook post referencing Kamala Harris,” he explained the ‘Joe and the Hoe’ quip was a reference to Harris’ sexual relationship with California Democrat Willie Brown, the married San Francisco mayor 31 years her senior who became her mentor at the beginning of her career.

Limbaugh also cited a story published in the Spectator magazine arguing that Harris “slept her way up” into California political life. The writer argues that Harris’ past relationship with Brown should gall other women, since the stereotype of high-ranking women “sleeping their way to the top” persists even in the feminist 21st century.

Harris, the shock jock agreed, owed her career to being the “mattress” – not “mistress,” he was careful to say – of this high-powered political figure.

While Limbaugh also remarked on how it was odd that the pair of stories had generated so little reaction in the mainstream media, his own comments about them were discovered on Monday by liberal watchdog Media Matters, which accused the popular radio host of “pushing vile sexist smears against Kamala Harris.”

…

Fact-checking website Snopes chimed in on the matter, saying it could not quite debunk the extramarital relationship between Harris and Brown, but rated it a “mixture,” arguing Brown was only “technically” married at the time. The site noted he had been separated from his wife for years and that his relationship with Harris was over by the time she won elected office.

For his part, in addition to admitting the two “dated,” Brown acknowledged he “may have influenced [Harris’] career by appointing her to two state commissions” when he was Assembly speaker, and conceded that he “certainly helped her with her first race for district attorney in San Francisco.”

Kamala is a literal whore, and this should be brought up front and center by the idiot Republican media.

White women are the demographic that Trump’s people are all worried about, and white women hate women who have sex with other women’s husbands. That is one place that white women are actually trad.

I’m sure the women of other races probably hate it too. Black women I’m pretty sure 100% hate this bitch elsewise, and the Democrats are going to have to try to keep her out of sight of black people because she is a fake black person created for the consumption of white people. She’s a friggin Hindu. Literally, she’s a practicing Hindu. Black people constantly get involved in weird cults, but I don’t think any black ever has become a Hindu.

You’re not going to get the Jared Kushner dream of blacks voting for Trump, but they might stay home if they get enough direct exposure to Kamala.

This bitch was Joe’s only option, and she’s a massive liability. That should be exploited fully.

Rush Limbaugh calling Kamala Harris a "Ho" is disgusting and repulsive! He's a fucking lowlife, sexist, racist piece of shit! And that Motherfucker has the Presidential Medal of Freedom!!!!

— Amy Lynn🌊🌺🌈 (@AmyAThatcher) August 17, 2020

Sean Hannity and these people just want to go on and on and on for eternity about how she’s “far left.” I know that Republicans love hearing about people being “so far left,” but no one is ever going to be swayed by that. This reveals another big problem with the Republican media: they are entirely ratings obsessed, and they’re going to get their best ratings by preaching to the choir instead of putting out talking points that are likely to spread and affect the most important demographics.

If any of you people have any sense at all, you need to put Kamala’s sexual issues front and center. Press the fact that this woman:

1. Made her entire career by sucking dick
2. Slept with at least one married man in order to advance her career

In fact, if you people weren’t pathetic, you would dig up Willie Brown’s wife and ask her how she feels about Kamala Harris.

This will affect women. We need to affect women. Women are the target demographic. We’re going to establish that Kamala is the real candidate for president, then if we establish her as a home-wrecker, every woman will look at this woman and think “she’s coming for my man next…!” That is the way women’s minds work. They really classify other women and develop pure hatred for them.

With the blacks, the message that needs to be continually pushed is that she has ZERO connection to black Americans, she is a fake black person. She has a Jamaican father, who was run off by her mother when she was 7 years old, and she was raised as a Hindu by her mother in Canada. And then get like, those Diamond and Silk women to go out there and say “she be comin fo yo man, uh-huh, she comin.”

The left knows what Rush said works. They know he hit on something that’s gonna do something.

Media Matters is trying to get him banned from speaking publicly because of these comments on Kamala.

In a video literally entitled “DEPLATFORM Rush Limbaugh for These INSANE Kamala Harris Comments,” newly green-haired used up skank Ana Kasparian called for Rush to be silenced for calling this bitch a hoe.

PROTIP: The over-ripe Armenian front-hole is not calling for Sean Hannity to have his freedom of speech stripped from him by a corporate conspiracy for calling Kamala Harris “a far-left socialist.”

She’s not calling for Mark Levin to be silenced for calling her a “gun-grabbing socialist.”

ULTRA-PROTIP: NO ONE WHO IS WORRIED ABOUT THE CONFISCATION OF THEIR AR-15 IS GOING TO VOTE FOR A DEMOCRAT. YOU DO NOT NEED TO CONVINCE PEOPLE WHO OWN AR-15S THAT THEY SHOULDN’T VOTE FOR KAMALA HARRIS. THE RIGHT-WING RADIO HOSTS WHO ARE TALKING ABOUT THIS NONSTOP ARE EITHER CHASING RATINGS OR THEY ARE SIMPLY CONTROLLED OPPOSITION PURPOSEFULLY WASTING PEOPLE’S TIME.

These pop right-wing shows are not simply entertainment. The masses of people get their talking points from these shows. If the talking points are “SHE’S A SOCIALIST, SHE WANTS TO CONFISCATE OUR AR-15S,” and then they go to work and share those talking points with their less right-wing co-workers, the co-workers roll their eyes. Conversely, if they go into work and say, “you know, this woman’s entire career is based on sucking the dick of a married man thirty years older than her? Yeah, she broke up his marriage so he’d give her promotions. No one would know who she was today if she hadn’t gotten these promotions by destroying Willie Brown’s marriage. She’s also a practicing Hindu raised in Canada” – then you’re going to get some noggins joggin.

This is obvious.

You right-wing media people make me sick.

Do your jobs. 

You’ve got to love Donald Trump’s game show host instincts that bring that extra slice of flair to politics.

At his State of the Union speech Tuesday night, Donald Trump told Rush Limbaugh to stand up and congratulated him on getting cancer. Then, after everyone was finished clapping and sat back down, Trump said “check under your seat, Rush.” And Rush checked under his seat, and found the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

You should have seen Rush’s face. He did a great job going along with the theatrics of the amazingly fantastic moment in American history.

It was an emotional moment for us all, because Rush did so much for us, convincing the country to go along with all of these endless wars in the Middle East and… whatever else he did, I’m sure he did many other things for America.

He’s much better than that sleaze-weasel Alex Jones, who did nothing but unconscionably spread deadly rumors about vaccines causing autism.

Can you imagine someone so sick as to spread this sort of vile disinformation?

Healthy young child goes to doctor, gets pumped with massive shot of many vaccines, doesn't feel good and changes – AUTISM. Many such cases!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 28, 2014

Rush Limbaugh truly is a lucky man.

I wish I was dying of cancer.

Here's the audio of Rush Limbaugh announcing on his show that he has lung cancer. pic.twitter.com/V60pAOpf68

— Julio Rosas (@Julio_Rosas11) February 3, 2020

Quit smoking, they said.

You’ll die of lung cancer, they said.

Well, how old is Rush Limbaugh?

Does anyone really want to live that long?

New York Times:

The conservative radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh said on his live show on Monday that he had advanced lung cancer.

He told listeners that he had noticed some shortness of breath but was not experiencing symptoms at the moment, and that he would continue working but would be absent from the show for a couple of days to undergo testing and determine a treatment plan.

“I can’t help but feel that I’m letting everybody down with this, but the upshot is that I have been diagnosed with advanced lung cancer,” Mr. Limbaugh, 69, said during his broadcast. He added that he first realized something was wrong on Jan. 12 and that the diagnosis had been confirmed by two medical institutions on Jan. 20.

“My heart’s in great shape, ticking away fine, squeezing and pumping great,” he said. “It was not that. It was a pulmonary problem involving malignancy. So I’m going to be gone the next couple days as we figure out the treatment course of action and have further testing done. But as I said, I’m going to be here as often as I can.”

People tell me that when I’m 69 I won’t want to die at 69.

But honestly, if I got diagnosed with a terminal illness tomorrow, I’d sigh with relief.

Shortly after the shooting, teenage survivors gather to gayly laugh about their sick plan to screw Donald Trump and destroy America. 

Survivors of the Jewish terrorist event in Florida are planning to launch their own brutal terror attack on America, demanding that we give up our guns so that we will all be easy prey for Jewish psychopaths like Nikolas Cruz.

This certainly removes any sympathy I might have had. Wow.

RT:

Students who survived the shooting rampage at Stoneman Douglas High School are urging children and parents to join them in a massive new protest. They will march on Washington, DC, to call for more gun control.

A group of five senior and junior students at the Parkland, Florida school, led by Cameron Kasky, appeared on several major TV networks over the weekend to drum up support for a “March for Our Lives” rally, scheduled to take place on March 24 in Washington, DC.

In an interview on Sunday, Kasky told CNN that they plan to send a message to the government: “You’re either with us or against us.”

Sounds pretty Jewish.

America is against you.

In their mission’s statement, the group disputes the notion that it’s still too early to talk about such a highly divisive political issue immediately after the shooting.

“In the tragic wake of the seventeen lives brutally cut short in Florida, politicians are telling us that now is not the time to talk about guns. March For Our Lives believes the time is now,” the activists said, adding that the focus of their efforts will be “to demand that a comprehensive and effective bill be immediately brought before Congress to address these gun issues.”

In the rallies and interviews that followed Wednesday’s deadly shooting, the students launched a scathing attack on the National Rifle Association (NRA) and President Donald Trump, blaming them for a lack of gun control legislation that could have prevented the incident.

The plea that has gained most traction was delivered by Emma Gonzalez in a speech at a gun control rally in Fort Lauderdale on Saturday, in which she criticized Trump for receiving $30 million in donations from the NRA, while arguing that 19-year-old shooter Nikolas Cruz “would not have harmed that many students with a knife.”

He wouldn’t have harmed anyone if he wasn’t Jewish.

Which is why a real movement against violence would be geared toward physically removing the Jewish menace from America.

This particular spic dyke has been especially a target of vitriol, with one disgruntled commenter saying “I would legitimately hatefuck that gun-grabbing dyke spic.” 

But of course, no one cares about real solutions.

Whoever is behind these kids (hint: Jews) is simply concerned with disarming the American people so they can be easily exterminated by Jews like Nikolas Cruz.

The real problem is the sickening FBI, that was too busy trying to hoax Donald Trump to stop this attack.

-Cops called to his house 36 times
-Two tips to FBI
-Dozens of reports to teachers
-Brought bullets to school
-Pics of guns on Insta
-Comments "I will be a school shooter" on YT
-Talks about killing ppl on Insta
-Threatens to kill ex's boyfriend

But it's a gun problem, right? https://t.co/oGh31d00VJ

— Nicholas J. Fuentes (@NickJFuentes) February 19, 2018

Every sign possible pointed to this Jew being a menace to society, and the FBI twiddled its thumbs.

Protecting society is not difficult. It is only difficult when you are busy trying to formulate a massive hoax involving Russian bots and trying to figure out a way for that to somehow make sense when it obviously does not.

Until we can get the FBI to the place where they are actually concerned about protecting Americans, rather than trying to destroy America with an insane bot-oriented hoax, we need to go with the Rush Limbaugh solution: encourage all students to bring guns to school to defend themselves.

Basic.

Common.

Sense.

Hundreds of Negro football players disrespected America by refusing to stand for the national anthem Sunday.

The ratings for Sunday’s Negro Felon League games came out today and as expected they were not good. It turns out that many White Americans don’t want to spend their time watching a game played by disrespectful niggers who refuse to stand for the national anthem.

The Hill:

Sunday night’s nationally televised game between the Washington Redskins and Oakland Raiders on NBC was the lowest-rated Week 3 game since 2006, according to Nielsen Media Research.

Overall, the Redskins 27-10 victory was down 9 percent compared to last week’s matchup between the Green Bay Packers and Atlanta Falcons, and 11 percent when compared to last year’s Week 3 Sunday night game on NBC.

The afternoon games also didn’t fare well, with Fox’s national game between the New York Giants and Philadelphia Eagles down 16 percent from the featured game in Week 3 last season on the network.

CBS’s national game at 4:25 p.m. ET, an overtime thriller featuring the Green Bay Packers comeback over the Cincinnati Bengals, was down just 1 percent when compared with 2016’s Week 3.

The Jew media is in damage control. They’re claiming that the league’s ratings were mixed and that it is too soon to tell if this national anthem business has had any impact.

Nice try kikes, but your days of using breads and circuses as a patriotic distraction are now over. You’ve just kiked yourselves by letting these football apes disrespect the national anthem. Nobody is going to look at the NFL the same way again. Even Rush Limbaugh has said that the NFL is dead.

The President noted that there was a “tremendous backlash” against the NFL over these stupid protests.

Tremendous backlash against the NFL and its players for disrespect of our Country.#StandForOurAnthem🇺🇸

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 25, 2017

The league is not going to admit that they got this wrong though. It is pretty much a guarantee that the rampant niggerism the league is plagued with will continue. After all, niggerism is officially sanctioned by the league itself. This is just going to turn more White Americans away from watching these pointless spectacles.

I mean, do you really want to spend your time watching a game where a nigger pretends to pee like a dog after he scores a touchdown?

It’s time for White Americans to rise up against this insanity. Instead of watching these monkeys chase after a ball every Sunday, do something productive with your time. Go to the gym, go on a bike ride, go on a hike, read a book, post Daily Stormer fliers in your local neighborhood or bang some chicks. These are all more productive activities than sitting on a couch drinking beer and watching a bunch of millionaire niggers who hate you and your family.

Rush Limbaugh has claimed at various times to be “a conservative first and a Republican second.” He also espouses principles like the “power of truth.” But what he has done over the past quarter-century has often been inconsistent with that idealistic persona, and conservatism has suffered for it, as has the country.

Following the election of the first non-White President of the United States in 2008, Rush Limbaugh expressed ambivalence about George W. Bush, one of the most despised U.S. presidents of all time. On the day after the election of the first Black president, Limbaugh fumed:

Well, my friends, the new tone has finally come home to roost. … Conservatism did not lose last night. Conservative was not on the ballot. The Republican Party has not sought to be conservative since the new tone was initiated by the Bush administration in 2001. [Rush Limbaugh, 5 November 2014]

The Republican Party was now in trouble because under George W. Bush, whom Limbaugh had supported, the party ceased to be conservative.

Are Free Trade and Zionist Wars Conservative?

That is, unless conservatism is to be defined as the expansion of free trade and the waging of Zionist wars. Are those policies conservative? If free trade is conservative, then Bill Clinton must be counted as a great conservative for signing NAFTA and opening free trade with China. If Zionist wars are conservative, then George W. Bush must be counted as a great conservative for the unnecessary invasion of Iraq. But we know that Rush Limbaugh does not regard Bill Clinton nor either of the presidents named Bush as conservative.

Free trade and Zionist wars are two points on which the establishments of both parties agree, and which they treat as non-negotiable — even when the majority of Americans disagree. And Rush Limbaugh has gone along with that bipartisan consensus. Bizarrely, Limbaugh has attacked the critics of that bipartisan Zionism and bipartisan plutocracy for deviating from “conservatism,” even though conservatism has no part in it.

Incidentally, to the extent that Limbaugh’s audience accepts this kind of misrepresentation, it reflects that the “dittoheads” have imposed a kind of information-ghetto on themselves,  rejecting the broader perspective that they could get by consulting diverse sources. “Rush is right,” and Fox News is the only news-channel that tells the truth. I have heard that from a number of self-identified conservatives.

Free trade works in the Democrats’ favor because, if Americans are suffering economically, it is understood that the Democrats are more likely to use the government to try to alleviate the situation, while Republicans, including Rush Limbaugh, complain even about food-assistance.

The fact that the Democratic Party has been reputed as the home of pacifism since the 1970s probably gives them an advantage when voters are upset about unnecessary wars — especially since the big wars in recent years have been started by Republicans. Also, the Democratic rank and file, at least, seems to be less rabidly Zionist than the Republicans with their reliance on Pre-millennialist Christian support.

The allegiance of Rush Limbaugh and the Republicans to free trade and Zionist wars is so rigid that they cannot admit that these positions have done nothing to help them win elections; they cannot even admit that a change of policy is a viable option.

In 2008 and 2012 Ron Paul sought the Republican presidential nomination as an anti-war candidate. Anti-war was a very popular position — outside of the Republican Party.

Public support for George W. Bush’s invasion of Iraq in March 2003 had never been overwhelming. It did not take long after the invasion for the support that had been created through scare-propaganda to collapse. By September 2005 a New York Times/CBS News poll showed that only 44% of Americans still said that military action against Iraq had been the right decision, and 8 in 10 were concerned about the expense of the war. A majority, 52%, favored not only withdrawal but immediate withdrawal from Iraq. During the presidential race in 2008, columnist Tom Teepen observed that being anti-war was an asset for a presidential candidate:

Obama opposed the war from the get-go, a stance widely assumed to be politically fatal at the time but one in which public opinion now strongly concurs. [Tom Teepen, 26 July 2008]

But Barack Obama turned out to be a disappointment for anti-war voters. Ron Paul, therefore, as a longtime, well known proponent of a non-interventionist foreign policy, could naturally be expected to win many crossover Democratic votes — if the Republicans would nominate him. Rasmussen and Gallup polls in 2011 showed that Ron Paul, if nominated by the Republican Party, could beat Obama. In fact it would be a landslide for Ron Paul if he could get more than lukewarm support from Republicans — which Rush Limbaugh could help to arrange, if he were so inclined.

Instead of helping Ron Paul, Limbaugh tried to extinguish the campaign. In an interview on Fox News, Limbaugh proclaimed: “Anybody other than Ron Paul could beat Obama” — flatly contradicting both evidence and common sense.

There was only one reason, according to Limbaugh himself, why he rigidly opposed Ron Paul: “his foreign policy” — specifically his criticism of Bush’s invasion of Iraq and opposition to warmongering against Iran.

But Ron Paul’s views on these matters were the views of the American majority. It was Rush Limbaugh’s view that was in the minority. Limbaugh nonetheless portrayed Ron Paul as a tinfoil-hat-wearer, a lunatic — for sharing the views of the majority!

When a Republican candidate who represents the view of the majority of Americans is deliberately undermined and marginalized within the Republican Party exclusively because he represents the American majority view, contrary to the agenda of the Israel Lobby, it becomes apparent that for Rush Limbaugh and many other Republicans, serving those Zionist Jews has been given a higher priority than winning elections. It even takes precedence over Limbaugh’s cherished less-government “conservatism,” which Ron Paul represents in the purest form that Limbaugh could ever hope to see. Ron Paul also happens to be a consistent opponent of abortion, which Mitt Romney is not. To Rush Limbaugh, for whatever reason, maintaining an interventionist Israel-First foreign policy is the concern that trumps all others.

The actual Republican nominee, Mitt Romney, whose Romneycare was the prototype for the Obamacare that Limbaugh loathes, severely damaged his own campaign by saying that 47% of the electorate would be disinclined to vote for him because they depend on government, implying that half the electorate is a detriment to the country.

After the 2012 defeat, Limbaugh complained, consistent with his usual pattern, that the Republican Party had lost due to lack of conservatism:

It wasn’t an election lost because we didn’t get the women’s vote, the Hispanic vote. We didn’t turn our vote out. It’s just that simple. Could it be, ladies and gentlemen, three million Republicans sat at home because they didn’t see enough of a conservative campaign? [Rush Limbaugh, 8 November 2012]

That is half-correct. A more candid assessment would be that the GOP repelled White voters by being unambiguously plutocratic and unambiguously supportive of Zionist wars. But Rush Limbaugh could not state such an assessment because he was rigidly committed to those two positions.

The Republican Establishment Purges “Extremists”

Since neither the Republican establishment nor Rush Limbaugh could accept the very clear fact that their party lost in 2012 by acting contrary to the economic needs of the White working class while supporting unpopular wars, they looked for alternate explanations.

In contrast to Limbaugh, who blames the loss in 2012 on the Republican Party’s failure to inspire the party’s core-constituency, the Republican establishment espouses an entirely opposite theory. They blame the party’s loss in 2012 on “extremists” within the party who, they think, give the party a bad image.

The most conspicuous of the “extremists” in 2014 was Chris McDaniel, a state legislator and talk show host from Mississippi who is a Republican in the mold of those Dixiecrats who defected from the Democratic Party to the GOP in the 60s and 70s, thereby making the election of Richard Nixon and all later Republican presidents possible. McDaniel had the endorsement of Tea Party Express because of his opposition to Obamacare, for which the incumbent Thad Cochran had voted. (Tea Party Express also happens to be one “Tea Party” organization that no longer supports free trade. We can hope that other populist Republicans are on that same learning-curve.) Chris McDaniel would now be a Senator-elect from Mississippi if the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Republican establishment — both of which favor amnesty for illegal aliens — had not moved heaven and earth to prevent it.

The Washington Post describes what happened as follows:

For much of the primary, [the incumbent Thad] Cochran was sleepy and might have been defeated outright were it not for a late push from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which aired a pro-Cochran testimonial from football legend Brett Favre on his farm in Hattiesburg, Miss.

McDaniel, a state senator, won the primary — though not by enough to avoid a runoff. The Republican establishment, as well as some black Democrats, rallied to Cochran’s side, and the incumbent narrowly prevailed.

McDaniel, bitter to this day, has refused to concede. “You had the entire Republican Party in Washington doing everything they could to keep the true conservative out,” he said. [P. Rucker, R. Costa, Washington Post, 5 November 2014]

Britain’s Daily Mail gives more details of the foul process whereby the will of the White people of Mississippi was denied political expression.  Essentially Blacks were mobilized through alarmist propaganda to vote in the Republican runoff — illegally in many cases, since they had already voted in the Democratic primaries.

Rush Limbaugh and probably the majority of White Republican voters in Mississippi share McDaniel’s bitterness, which is directed toward the Republican establishment and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce  as the forces behind the sabotage of McDaniel’s campaign (Caller from Mississippi complains about the Republican establishment, 20 November 2014 ).

Meanwhile, Charles Krauthammer, a Jewish neocon, without stating names, condescendingly praised the Republicans for purging McDaniel:

You exercised adult supervision over the choice of candidates. You didn’t allow yourself to go down the byways of gender and other identity politics. [C. Krauthammer, 6 November 2014]

I love it when Jews eschew identity politics — for non-Jews. Of course, Krauthammer’s rabid support for Israel couldn’t possibly have anything to do with his very strong Jewish identity.

Charles Krauthammer was also the first major influence among the Republicans, after the Republican defeat in 2012, to call for the Republicans to embrace amnesty for illegal aliens in order to win Hispanic votes, as Limbaugh noted at the time. In other contexts, where Krauthammer’s name is not mentioned, Limbaugh has said that if the Republican Party follows such advice on illegal immigration, it will cease to exist. The reverent tone with which Limbaugh still refers to “Doctor Krauthammer” is therefore quite incongruous. It is obvious that Rush Limbaugh is afraid to criticize Charles Krauthammer, even though they are in direct conflict in a matter about which Limbaugh feels strongly.

Rush Limbaugh and Amnesty for Illegal Aliens

The two longtime points of bipartisan consensus, free trade and Zionist wars, are now joined by a third, amnesty for illegal aliens. This time, Rush Limbaugh — finally — is not going along.

On the day after the 2014 elections, Rush Limbaugh talked to a Black caller named Larry in southern California who was angry at Obama for his generosity toward illegal aliens. Larry complained that Blacks in his region already could not get jobs because of illegal aliens (Click to listen). On 19 November a more educated-sounding Negro, Eric in North Carolina, made the same point (Click to listen). These callers both made the very simple and obvious point that immigration of Hispanics is bad for Blacks. This information was liberating for Rush Limbaugh: now he felt free to complain about illegal immigration without fear of being labeled racist.

Since Larry’s call, Rush Limbaugh has been increasingly criticizing Obama’s amnesty for illegal immigrants, and, more and more, the Republicans’ failure to oppose it, which, Limbaugh now observes, is worse than mere failure to oppose: they covertly support it. Limbaugh is now proclaiming the dishonesty and venality of the Republican establishment, serving their donors rather than the public that elected them, a common theme on VDARE.com and TOO.

Specifically, Limbaugh refers to the role of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in pushing for amnesty, because, Limbaugh says, they want the cheap labor. In doing so, he is referring to the labor market critique of immigration emanating from the right and embodied in politicians like Jeff Sessions and David Brat. The fact that unregulated capitalism demands immigration for cheap labor and that this destroys nations was often observed by critics of capitalism in the nineteenth century. Now Rush Limbaugh realizes it.

It must have been an awkward confession for Rush Limbaugh, after so many years of pontificating that whatever helps the rich to get richer — whatever helps the “job creators,” as Eric Cantor called them — is automatically good for America. It shows a serious problem with the nineteenth-century liberal ideology that Limbaugh and other Republicans have been espousing as “conservatism.” Rush Limbaugh is having to face the fact that unbridled pursuit of private profit can be disastrous for the country — and disastrous for a great many White people who are naturally attracted to the Republican Party because they see the Democrats as the party of non-Whites and aggressive multiculturalism, sexual non-conformists, and government unions.

Finally, after a quarter-century of lamentable compromise, the Republican establishment is crossing a bridge that Rush Limbaugh refuses to cross, which brings him to a crisis, not only in his relationship to the Republican establishment, but in his ideology.

Pope Francis has been forced to defend his economic and social ideologies after prominent conservatives accused him of coming forward with “pure Marxism”.

Speaking to an Italian newspaper today, the pope described Marxism as “wrong”, but refused to condemn people who hold left-wing views.

The comments came after the Pontiff railed against the “new tyranny” of unfettered capitalism in an 84-page document published last month.

The “apostolic exhortation” sets out the terms by which a pope intends to run the Catholic Church – yet it was slammed by the outspoken conservative US talk show host Rush Limbaugh.

Mr Limbaugh, who is not a member of the church, said the comments went “beyond Catholicism” and were “purely political”. He claimed parts of the document were “pure Marxism coming out of the mouth of the pope”, and suggested that someone else must have written the papal document for him.

Today, Pope Francis said: “Marxist ideology is wrong. But in my life I have known many Marxists who are good people, so I don’t feel offended.”

In his response to the critics, the pope said he was not speaking “as a technician but according to the social doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church, and this does not mean being Marxist”. He said he was just trying to present a “snapshot of what is happening” in the world today.

Read More