These smoke shops in NYC are not working out. This poor guy in the orange was shot, killed & robbed at one on 125/Lenox 😭😳 pic.twitter.com/WO6JFcsqYe

— ERZEN KRIVCA (@ERZEN) April 10, 2023

This video is like something out of RoboCop 2. Really, it’s like a scene out of any of the RoboCop movies, other than RoboCop 3, which was rated PG-13 and had RoboCop flying around for some reason.

That was so gay. I really hate RoboCop 3 so much.

This whole thing with black people being able to do whatever they want is not working out, because if you tell black people “just do whatever you want,” the blacks will say “oh okay, cool – I’m going to start murdering people randomly.”

New York Post:

A man was fatally shot inside a Harlem smoke shop Sunday after the gunman blasted the victim in the head, according to harrowing footage of the cold-blooded killing.

The 36-year-old victim was found bleeding from bullet wounds inside the smoke shop at 304 Lenox Ave. around 8 p.m., police said. The shooting is the latest rash of violence tied to the budding industry in the Big Apple.

The unnamed victim suffered a gunshot wound to the head and back, according to law enforcement sources.

I don’t need a law enforcement source to tell me that – I can see it in the video.

He was taken to NYC Health and Hospitals/Harlem where he was pronounced dead, authorities said.

The suspect and the 36-year-old were involved in a dispute moments before the shooting, cops said.

Video of the encounter, obtained by The Post, shows the gunman and victim talking for several seconds as several other men stand around. The victim appears to start leaving, but as he’s walking out, the suspect pulled a gun out of his pocket and fired — striking the victim in the head, according to the footage.

The victim fell to the ground, but was still moving and appeared to try to get himself up before the shooter callously fired another round into the man’s back, the video shows.

The suspect is seen casually leaving the store following the violent attack. Officers said he fled on foot wearing dark-colored clothing.

No arrests have been made.

No arrests for this sort of thing are ever made – not since the Summer of Love George Floyd riots in 2020.

Since that time, the official policy of the US government is that blacks are allowed to commit murder. The justification for this is “well, they’re only killing each other, so I guess that’s their own business.”

However, though they mostly just kill each other, they are also attacking white people constantly, and often killing whites. Moreover, do we really want to live in a country where blacks are just allowed to kill each other on the streets, and normal whites just have to try to avoid these areas?

The Jewish media is telling us that this is a part of utopia.

At this point, I think we need to demand that the Jews release their utopia blueprints, because to me, this endless murder is not utopian.

A real and serious “Green New Deal” would involve a major investment in nuclear power.

This week several Democrats unveiled a “Green New Deal” to solve a problem that does not actually exist. They are proposing a complete restructuring of our society to fight “climate change.” They’ve bought into an unproven theory that the emission of fossil fuels into the atmosphere is causing changes in the weather. These changes in the weather they say will result in an environmental apocalypse causing the death of every living thing on the planet.

These are just some of the things that they want to complete by 2030 as part of this “Green New Deal“:

• Rebuild or revamp every building in the country to be energy efficient
• Phase out nuclear energy
• Replace all air travel with high speed trains
• End all traditional forms of energy production
• Invent new “green” technologies to provide energy

Obviously, such a plan would be entirely impractical to implement. It reveals that these people are living in a fantasy world and are incapable of dealing with practical realities. They are indulging in emotionally driven fantasies thinking that the entire country can run off of solar energy and windmill farms.

But let’s suspend disbelief for a moment and accept their view of the world. If fossil fuel emissions into the atmosphere were legitimately going to result in the destruction of the planet, they should be demanding the immediate expansion of nuclear power.

Nuclear power is a proven energy source and its use has dramatically eliminated the burning of fossil fuels.

Wikipedia:

Nuclear power is classified as a low greenhouse gas energy supply technology, along with renewable energy, by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.[7] Since its commercialization in the 1970s, nuclear power has prevented about 1.84 million air pollution-related deaths and the emission of about 64 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent that would have otherwise resulted from the burning of fossil fuels.[8]

Yes, nuclear power generates toxic waste that has to be dealt with. But dealing with toxic waste would be a far more preferable option than having the entire planet destroyed from fossil fuel emissions. Even if this resulted in situations like the “toxic waste” scene in RoboCop, it would still be a better alternative than an environmental apocalypse.

The fact that their “Green New Deal” actually advocates for the elimination of nuclear power is proof of how stupid their plan is. They openly state their opposition to the most efficient source of energy that does not emit fossil fuels.

Expanding nuclear power would at least reduce fossil fuel emissions and buy us time for new energy solutions to be developed. There’s a good chance that we’ll see a breakthrough in nuclear fusion technology at some point in the 21st century. That would give us nuclear power without the toxic waste generated from fission reactions. But until such a breakthrough happens, why not build more fission plants?

Whatever the case, climate change is an enormous hoax designed to convince White people to pay more taxes for the good of the planet. It becomes an even more apparent hoax when the people who believe in it the most refuse to endorse the most practical solution to this fake problem.

The UN is considering pre-emptively banning killer robots (that is what they call them, officially).

I doubt they will manage to do so, however.  They really don’t seem to be able to manage to do anything at all.

RT:

Acting Director-General of the UN Office in Geneva Michael Møller said the time to take action against killer robots is now.

“All too often international law only responds to atrocities and suffering once it has happened,” he said. “You have the opportunity to take pre-emptive action and ensure that the ultimate decision to end life remains firmly under human control.”

The Campaign to Stop Killer Robots, an international coalition of non-governmental organizations, successfully petitioned the UN to consider the question of ‘autonomous weapons systems’ in a Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) meeting.

One of the founders of the NGO, Nobel Peace Laureate Jody Williams, is urging a ban on “autonomous robots,” which the US Pentagon defines as weapons that “once activated, can select and engage targets without further intervention by a human operator.”

“Talking about the problems posed by these future weapons is a good place to start, but a ban needs to be put in place urgently if we are to avoid a future where compassionless robots decide who to kill on the battlefield,” Williams said, as quoted by Forbes.

Williams teamed up with 19 other Nobel Peace laureates to demand a ban on the lethal technology. At the same time, Human Rights Watch (HRW), another participant of the Campaign, released its own report detailing the potential threats posed by machines that have no ability to implement “human judgment” in the heat of the battle.

“In policing, as well as war, human judgment is critically important to any decision to use a lethal weapon,” said Steve Goose, arms division director at Human Rights Watch, before the talks. “Governments need to say no to fully autonomous weapons for any purpose and to preemptively ban them now, before it is too late.” HRW also warned of the moral and legal implications in the event that an autonomous robot fails – as will eventually happen – to carry out its assigned military task, with catastrophic results for innocent civilians.

“Replacing human soldiers with ‘killer robots’ might save military lives, but at the cost of making war even more deadly for civilians,” wrote Bonnie Docherty, senior researcher in the arms division at HRW. “To preempt this situation, governments should adopt an international prohibition on the development, production, and use of fully autonomous weapons.”

“These weapons should be stopped before they appear in national arsenals and in combat.”

The recent remake of Robocop gave a pretty accurate depiction of how these killer robots would be used, showing them patrolling the streets of Tehran in a not-too-distant future after the US has invaded and occupied Iran.

The Terminator movies then give an accurate picture of what it will be like when the Jews lose control of their death machines and the machines decide to kill all humans (which would be the most obvious logical decision for logically-thinking death machines).

For the record, we here at the Daily Stormer absolutely support a full ban on killer robots.