I know blacks are good runners, but is this really necessary?

Do we have to turn over everything we have to these blacks?

Al-Jazeera:

Kemi Badenoch has won the race to become the new leader of the United Kingdom’s Conservative Party, pledging to return it to its founding principles and win back voters after its worst election defeat in July.

Badenoch, 44, came out on top in the two-horse race with former Immigration Minister Robert Jenrick, winning 57 percent of the votes of party members.

She received 53,806 votes, while Jenrick got 41,388 votes from the 131,680 eligible electors. The party placed turnout at 72.8 percent.

Badenoch replaces former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and has pledged to lead the party through a period of renewal, saying it had veered towards the political centre by “governing from the left” and must return to its traditional ideas.

The first Black woman leader of a major political party in the UK, Badenoch said becoming leader was an “enormous honour”, but that “the task that stands before us is tough.”

The combative former equalities minister faces the daunting task of reuniting a divided and weakened party that was emphatically removed from power in July after 14 years in charge.

“We have to be honest about the fact we made mistakes” and “let standards slip”, she said.

“It is time to get down to business, it is time to renew,” she added.

Born in London to Nigerian parents, Badenoch spent her childhood years in Lagos. She became an MP in 2017, and, in 2022, made her first bid for Conservative leader.

With forthright views on everything from what she calls identity politics to the value of officials, Badenoch attracts both strong admirers and detractors.

What kind of people would admire a bitch like this?

Are they mentally retarded?

The population of England and Wales at mid-year 2023 was estimated to be 60.9 million.

Although increasing at a similar rate to the previous 12 months, the year to mid-2023 saw the largest annual increase in at least 75 years, up by almost 610,000.

➡️ https://t.co/CsuH9D06i4 pic.twitter.com/0UlGquX5sQ

— Office for National Statistics (ONS) (@ONS) July 15, 2024

Everyone is talking about World War III and the collapse of the economies of Europe.

Meanwhile, the borders remain open, and the countdown to “white minority” keeps moving faster.

Breitbart:

The mass migration policies of the ousted UK “Conservative” government have resulted in the largest population increase in recorded history.

Figures released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed that the population of England and Wales climbed by 610,000 between mid-2022 and mid-2023, taking the officially recognised total population to 60.9 million, the sharpest increase since records began 75 years ago in 1949.

The historic population rise beat out the previous highs of 484,000 and 478,000 seen in the years leading up to mid-2016 and mid-2011, respectively. Before that, the previous record occurred in the year up to mid-1962, which saw an increase of 461,000 as a result of the baby boom.

The country’s official statistician admitted that the population growth was almost entirely down to mass migration, with net migration standing at 622,000 during the time period analysed.

This came as a result of 1,084,000 foreigners immigrating to England and Wales from outside of the UK, compared to 462,000 who left the country in the year up to mid-2023.

Demonstrating the dominating impact of the open-door immigration agenda, the figures showed that absent migration the population would have actually declined, with the number of births in Britain falling by 21,900 to 598,400, which was outpaced by deaths, rising by 24,000 to 598,000 as the native population continues to age.

While the Conservative Party had pledged to reduce net migration from “the hundreds of thousands to the tens of thousands” in their election manifestos in 2010, 2015, and 2017 and had told the public that they would cut migration in 2019, the opposite occurred as Boris Johnson’s post-Brexit immigration reforms opened up mass migration to the rest of the world.

Former Chancellor of the Exchequer and David Cameron’s globalist right-hand-man George Osborne admitted that the Conservative Party leadership never supported “the pledge in private and all would be glad to see the back of [it]” and that the party could have reduced non-EU-based immigration before Brexit but refused to do so.

This betrayal was a major contributor to the monumental collapse of the Tories in the general election earlier this month when the so-called Conservative Party suffered a net loss of 251 MPs, falling from 372 in 2019 to just 121 now, the lowest in the history of the centuries-old party.

Did anyone vote for this?

Did anyone want it?

White women I guess wanted it.

They love this shit.

It’s about time someone remembered anal soldiers.

They’ve done so much for us.

The Guardian:

The UK’s first memorial commemorating the “lost legion” of LGBT people who have served in the armed forces is to be built at the National Memorial Arboretum.

The memorial will be built after a charity spearheading efforts to get justice for veterans affected by the pre-2000 ban on LGBT people serving in the UK armed forces was awarded a £350,000 grant.

The LGBT veterans charity Fighting With Pride has said the memorial will be “representative” and a “place for peace and reflection”, but has urged the government to implement recommendations from a government-commissioned review by Lord Etherton last year, including compensation.

“We’re committed to delivering a fitting memorial, but a great deal of work remains to be done to lift the veterans most affected by the ban from the poverty inflicted upon them after the loss of careers,” said Craig Jones, the chair of Fighting With Pride.

“Too many face crippling debt, poor housing, social isolation and live with poor health and wellbeing. 2024 must be the year in which all 49 of Lord Etherton’s recommendations for reparation are delivered.”

The review, which began last year, examined the experiences of LGBT veterans who served in the military during the 1967-2000 ban on LGBT people serving in the UK armed forces.

Etherton’s report said: “I recommend that the prime minister should deliver an apology in the UK parliament on behalf of the nation to all those LGBT service personnel who served under and suffered from the ban (whether or not they were dismissed or discharged).”

It recommended that an “appropriate financial award” should be made to veterans affected by the ban, with a maximum total of £50m, and said the plan should not be affected by normal litigation time limits.

Last year, Rishi Sunak and the then defence minister, Ben Wallace, formally apologised to the Commons for the decades-long ban and promised to implement the “vast majority” of Etherton’s recommendations.

The question is: are normal people going to want to join the British military to fight the 3-front war their government is planning, when the whole thing is a big anal fiasco?

They also want Moslems in their military, and advertise that as much as anal.

What if the homo and Moslem soldiers start killing each other before they ever meet the Russians, Chinese, or Iranians?

How are the Moslems in the British army supposed to tolerate this faggotry?

No one is getting deported to Rwanda.

This is all a ruse by Rishi to try to move more blacks into Ireland.

Reuters:

The threat of deportation to Rwanda is causing migrants to head for Ireland instead of staying in Britain, Ireland’s deputy prime minister told a British newspaper on Friday.

British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s flagship programme to send asylum seekers to Rwanda if they arrive in
Britain illegally was approved by parliament earlier this week and the government wants the first flights to take off in 10-12 weeks.

Deputy Prime Minister Micheal Martin told The Daily Telegraph that the policy was already affecting Ireland because people were “fearful” of staying in Britain.

He said asylum seekers were seeking “to get sanctuary here and within the European Union as opposed to the potential of being deported to Rwanda”.

…

Earlier this week, Ireland’s Minister of Justice Helen McEntee told a parliamentary committee she estimates that more than 80 per cent of people applying for asylum in Ireland are coming from Britain over the land Border with Northern Ireland.

It sounds like you should close that border, huh?

Remember: these people tried to force vaccinate everyone with a deadly gene therapy.

Food might be a little bit more regulated in the UK than in the US, but not by much.

Actually, that’s only half as obese as the United States. But still. It’s a health crisis.

Smoking, by the way, is not a health crisis. When’s the last time you heard of someone dying from smoking? People die from vaccines and obesity all the time.

So: why are they so obsessed with shutting down nicotine? Is it because it increases both testosterone and brain function?

Reuters:

British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s plan to ban anyone aged 15 and under from ever buying cigarettes passed its first parliamentary vote on Tuesday, although dozens of his own lawmakers voted against it.

Sunak’s plan to impose some of the world’s strictest anti-smoking rules has angered some members of his governing Conservative Party, including former prime ministers Liz Truss and Boris Johnson, who say the state should not interfere in how people live their lives.

The bill passed a vote in Britain’s parliament with 383 in favour and 67 against, meaning it will progress to the next stage in parliament, where it can be subject to amendment.

Lawmakers were given a so-called free vote on the bill, meaning they did not have to vote along party lines. A similar law in New Zealand was scrapped this year by the new coalition government before the legislation went into force.

But 57 Conservatives, including Business and Trade Secretary Kemi Badenoch, voted against the plan, and the scale of the rebellion was another blow for Sunak, who has already faced criticism in his party over issues ranging from climate change to defence policy.

…

Polling by YouGov, opens new tab also suggests a smoking ban is popular, with a third of voters supporting the phased approach, 30% supporting a ban for everyone at the same time and only a quarter saying there shouldn’t be any ban.

57 isn’t even 1/5 of the “conservative” members of parliament.

Britain is a failed state.

They are harder on cigarettes than they are on immigrants, that’s for sure.

]]> https://www.anglinarchive.com/2024/03/29/uk-boat-crossings-in-the-first-3-months-hit-new-all-time-record/ Fri, 29 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0000

Every white country on earth is experiencing record numbers of immigrants, while we’re being told to be very concerned about Ukrainians and Jews.

These wars, even if the West loses them badly, will have succeeded in distracting the masses of people from the crisis of immigration. We are being buried alive by immigrants, and will have no future if we do not start deporting these people immediately.

Remix:

Britain experienced a record number of illegal migrants arriving on its southern shore in the first three months of the year, piling the pressure on a Conservative government failing to appease its core voters on immigration.

A total of 4,644 migrants landed in southeast England on small boats from Europe up to March 26, according to provisional Home Office data — up considerably from 3,770 last year and the previous record high of 4,162 recorded in 2022.

Boat crossings were down toward the end of last year, prompting Home Secretary James Cleverly to trumpet the government’s efforts in cracking down on illegal immigration and claiming Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s administration was honoring its pledge to “stop the boats.”

Cleverly dismissed critics who claimed that adverse weather conditions had been the primary contributing factor to the drop in arrivals; however, the recent spike in arrivals coinciding with warmer weather conditions and plainer sailing appears to lend credence to the theory.

The Home Office is now using the spiraling figures to push its immigration reforms currently held up in the House of Lords — the upper chamber of Britain’s bicameral legislature — claiming a change in the law is needed to ensure deportation flights can take off for Rwanda, the African nation with whom Britain recently signed an asylum agreement.

“The unacceptable number of people who continue to cross the [English] Channel demonstrates exactly why we must get flights to Rwanda off the ground as soon as possible,” a Home Office spokesperson said last week.

…

Conservative voters in Britain have grown tired of empty promises, however, and appear to be voting with their feet against a party that has consistently promised to reduce immigration while allowing it to sky-rocket to unprecedented levels in recent years.

Recent polling has the governing party attaining almost half the vote share of the opposition Labour Party with 22 percent to 42 percent. A Redfield Wilton survey published on Wednesday made even grimmer reading for Sunak in Wales where the Tories could soon find themselves coming third in a two-horse race, sitting at 16 percent and just one percentage point ahead of the fledgling right-wing Reform UK party run by Brexiteer Richard Tice and closely affiliated with nationalist firebrand Nigel Farage.

Farage should have joined the Tories and become Prime Minister after he did Brexit, but instead he quit politics and hosted a talk show. He can’t become Prime Minister with his Reform Party platform.

He’s an appealing figure, but he’s made bad decisions.

That said, it would be pretty incredible if he made second place anywhere in the UK.

The election is on December 17.

White women sure aren’t having kids.

Well, maybe they’re “having kids” at the abortion clinic. Maybe they’re having mulattos. But that’s about it.

The entire white race is facing an existential crisis and total implosion. Except in Russia.

Breitbart:

London’s population has reportedly soared to a record high mostly due to migration, further straining the housing market and social services, an analysis has found.

Research conducted by the Centre for Cities think tank has claimed with “almost certainty” that the population of London is at its highest level in history, in large part due to the waves of new arrivals continuing to come to the city.

While the report found that London’s population decreased by 75,500 between mid-2019 and mid-2021 during the coronavirus lockdowns, this trend has reversed in large part due to the Conservative-in-name-only government’s open-door migration policies enacted following Brexit.

Centre for Cities said that 66,000 people moved to the British capital in 2022 and although numbers for 2023 are not yet available, only 9,000 would have needed to have moved to the city last year to bring the population to a new record of over 10.1 million, The Telegraph reports.

The think tank said that the influx of foreigners was the main driver of the population growth, reporting that 38,170 migrants moved to the city in 2019-20 and 73,660 more came in the following year.

This trend is likely to continue, with net migration to the UK hitting a record 1.2 million over the past two years, despite longstanding pledges from the Tories to reduce immigration; a promise which party bigwigs admitted they never had any intention of fulfilling.

Responding to the report, Migration Watch UK Chairman Alp Mehmet, in comments provided to Breitbart London, said: “London’s population explosion is a direct result of mass and rapid immigration. The government’s promises to ‘take back control’ and reduce numbers have once again been shown to have been hollow.

“Alp Mehmet” is the Chairman of Migration Watch?

Jeez, man.

Jeez.

“While Mayor Sadiq Khan’s passion for migration both adds to the problems Londoners face with housing, health and transport and encourages more people to come. The crises we face in the sectors will not be solved without big cuts in immigration.”

Migration Watch went on to note that the migration population of London, as of 2020, accounted for 35 per cent of all foreigners in the UK. The think tank said that if current projections from the Office of National Statistics of the country adding another 6.1 million foreigners by 2036 hold true, London’s population could surpass 12 million within the next 12 years.

Yeah.

It’s so over.

The Tories will lose the next elections badly, and be replaced by a party that will do the exact same thing but worse

It’s not over.

The future is wide open.

But we are not back, I can tell you that.

The West has fallen and billions must die.

This is thinking with your noggin.

The Mirror:

The Home Office plans to pay a rapper, two comedians, TV stars and influencers to post messages on TikTok deterring small boat crossings, it is claimed.

Officials have reportedly drawn up a shortlist of celebrities in Albania who they think will get the message across to young men. The Government also plans to expand the social media scheme to Iraq, Egypt and Vietnam, with Turkey and India also being looked at.

The Brutal Syrian Civil War is nowhere more brutal than in Albania

Ministers are desperately grappling with ways of preventing people reaching the UK by crossing the Channel, with the asylum backlog at nearly 100,000 at the end of 2023. The Home Office said it has been running a social media deterrence campaign in Albania, France and Belgium for the past three years, and believes the message is getting through.

Documents seen by The Times show a shortlist of influencers in Albania includes a rapper – Omg Dioh – and two comedians, along with lifestyle bloggers, TV personalities and a travel writer. Officials are understood to be in discussions with other governments about using social media in their countries to deter people coming to the UK.

This is the kind of guy you want to take advice from

Former Home Secretary Suella Braverman is claimed to have blocked the idea saying it is “frivolous”, but it has been backed by her successor, James Cleverly. The Government says smugglers are using social networks like TikTok to encourage people to make the perilous journey. TikTok posts will include warnings that people could be detained and deported.

A Home Office spokesperson said: “People smugglers frequently use social media to peddle lies and promote their criminal activities, and it is vital that we utilise the same platforms to inform migrants about the truths about crossing the Channel and coming to the UK illegally. The relentless action we have taken reduced crossings by 36% last year, which saw similar weather conditions to 2022. We make no apologies for using every means necessary to stop the boats and save lives.”

Apparently, they need fewer Albanians because they need the room for more Africans.

The UK is definitely not slowing immigration, generally.

Who even knows why they’re targeting Albanians.

Albanians literally post videos of themselves breaking the law on social media, and they still can’t get deported

The solution to bad information was always good information.

This issue of censorship was solved like 500 years ago.

It might make sense to do censorship if you don’t have a democracy. That’s at least plausibly coherent.

But if you have a universal suffrage democracy, you are saying that every single person in the society is so totally actualized that they are able to make very serious decisions about the way the government is run. That is the claim being made in the core proposition of democracy.

If people can’t figure out that some videos on the internet are fake, then they can’t possibly also be able to decide the fate of a nation through voting.

Further, if you are limiting the ability of people to access information in a democracy, you are admitting that these masses of peasants are not capable of making serious decisions about the way the government should be run.

You can’t say “these people are so self-actualized that they can, collectively, make very good decisions about the way a country is run” and “these people are so stupid we have to protect them from goofy fake news stories.”

Only one of those things can be true.

The Guardian:

More than 100 deepfake video advertisements impersonating Rishi Sunak were paid to be promoted on Facebook in the last month alone, according to research that has raised alarm about the risk AI poses before the general election.

The adverts may have reached as many as 400,000 people – despite appearing to break several of Facebook’s policies – and mark the first time that the prime minister’s image has been doctored in a systematic way en masse.

More than £12,929 was spent on 143 adverts, originating from 23 countries including the US, Turkey, Malaysia and the Philippines.

They include one with faked footage of a BBC newsreader, Sarah Campbell, appearing to read out breaking news that falsely claims a scandal has erupted around Sunak secretly earning “colossal sums from a project that was initially intended for ordinary citizens”.

It carries the untrue claim that Elon Musk has launched an application capable of “collecting” stock market transactions and follows with a faked clip of Sunak saying the government had decided to test the application rather than risking the money of ordinary people.

The clips then lead to a spoofed BBC News page promoting a scam investment.

The research was carried out by Fenimore Harper, a communications company set up by Marcus Beard, a former Downing Street official who headed No 10’s response to countering conspiracy theories during the Covid crisis.

He warned that the adverts, which mark a shift in the quality of the fakes, showed that elections this year were at risk of manipulation from a large quantity of high quality AI-generated falsehoods.

…

A UK government spokesperson said: “We are working extensively across government to ensure we are ready to rapidly respond to any threats to our democratic processes, through our defending democracy taskforce and dedicated government teams.

“Our Online Safety Act goes further by putting new requirements on social platforms to swiftly remove illegal misinformation and disinformation – including where it is AI-generated – as soon as they become aware of it.”

If you’re worried about fake ads, run your own ads saying that the fake ads are fake. Either that, or just admit that democracy, as it is advertised, is totally impossible, because people are too stupid, and we therefore need a new system that is more openly authoritarian in nature.

Related: WEF Says AI-Driven Misinformation Threatens Democracy and The Economy

Elvis Dunderhoff contributed to this article. 

This is the one step back after five leaps forward again.

We’re seeing this with immigration, we’re seeing it with the social stuff.

It’s all based on AI behavioral models.

The Guardian:

Teachers should consider if students wanting to socially transition to another gender were “influenced by social media or peers”, under new government guidelines for how schools and colleges in England deal with transgender children and young people.

The draft guidance issued by the education secretary, Gillian Keegan, and the equalities minister, Kemi Badenoch, advises there is “no general duty” for schools and colleges to let students change their preferred names, pronouns or uniforms – known as social transitioning – and stresses that parents should be involved in any decisions except where it would endanger the child.

Who decides this?

How do they decide it?

When you do not have a religion, or some state ideology that place-holds for a religion (communism), then how does anyone decide anything?

With some kind of guiding thought, everything is in a vacuum.

The guidance requires schools to maintain separate toilets and changing facilities for each sex after age eight, allows staff and students to ignore pronouns preferred by socially transitioning children, and for sport and PE activities to be segregated by sex if there are safety concerns.

“Schools and colleges should seek to understand societal or other factors that may have influenced the child, for example: has the child been influenced by peers or social media? Does the child feel pressured to identify differently because they simply do not align with stereotypes associated with their sex?” the guidance states.

The guidance is the first of its type to be issued to schools in England, and has been the subject of much controversy among ministers and MPs since it was proposed by Rishi Sunak earlier this year.

The prime minister’s official spokesperson said schools “will be held to account” under the new guidance.

“This is what [teachers] have been asking for, and what we have provided is clarity on how to approach a very sensitive and complex area. Crucially, it’s clear that parents must always be involved in the decisions that affect their children’s lives. And it gives clarity and protection to teachers so they have confidence.”

The heads of three major children’s charities – Barnardo’s, NSPCC and Children’s Society – said the welfare of individual children should be the guidance’s primary consideration.

“We understand there has been no engagement with children and young people themselves in the development of this guidance so far. It is vital their voices are heard during the consultation period,” the joint statement said.

“We will be engaging with government to urge them to make sure children’s best interests and, in particular, those of individual children questioning their gender identity, are protected under the final version of this guidance.”

Groups supporting the right of children to transition in education criticised the draft guidance as dangerous and unworkable.

Stonewall, the LBGT+ charity, compared the guidance to the “chilling effect” caused by the 1988 section 28 regulation that banned schools discussing homosexuality.

“Not only is it legally unworkable and contrary to existing equality law and the government’s own guidance on safeguarding, it is actively dangerous. If implemented it would inevitably lead to real harm being caused to trans children and young people across England,” a spokesperson for Stonewall said.

The full statement from those pedophile psychos at Stonewall

But Maya Forstater, the executive director of the campaigning group Sex Matters, said: “The most important takeaway is that the normalisation of so-called social transition – lying about children’s sex – is indefensible within a school environment.

“We are grateful that the government has listened to experts and prioritised the wellbeing and safeguarding of children in this guidance, rather than pandering to ideological, anti-scientific dogma.”

The draft publication also divided its supporters. Some, including the former prime minister Liz Truss, said new legislation would be required.

“I fear that activists and others will be able to exploit loopholes in the guidance and the existing legal framework to pursue their agenda,” she said.

The former home secretary Suella Braverman said it was a “serious weakness” that the guidance still allowed social transitioning in schools.

“Too much discretion is left to individual schools and teachers … Ultimately if the law needs to be changed, then ministers must be prepared to act,” she said.

I’m not hopeful.

This is a response to backlash, therefore damage control, and damage control by nature has a limited scope.