It looks like Madam Rowling has upped her power level.

It’s possible that Sir Dawkins going all in gave her a boost of confidence?

Please sign the Declaration on Women’s Sex-based Rights. I have just done so.https://t.co/QmJ1uzNY3k

— Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) November 29, 2021

We’re hitting some limits of some things.

It was always too late, but it’s nice to see limits getting hit.

New York Post:

J.K. Rowling is causing controversy again, again wading into the debate about transgender people by criticizing Scottish police for allowing rape suspects to self-identify as female.

The “Harry Potter” author — who has previously been accused of making transphobic comments — took to Twitter on Sunday by sharing an article from The Times of London titled: “‘Absurdity’ of police logging rapists as women.”

“War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Strength. The Penised Individual Who Raped You Is a Woman,” Rowling wrote, referencing “Newspeak” in George Orwell’s “1984.”

She then linked to the news article, which stated, “Police Scotland said that they would log rapes as being carried out by a woman if the accused person insists, even if they have not legally changed gender.”

Thousands of fans immediately hit out at Rowling, with many accusing her of having an unhealthy fixation on trans issues.

War is Peace.
Freedom is Slavery.
Ignorance is Strength.
The Penised Individual Who Raped You Is a Woman.https://t.co/SyxFnnboM1

— J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) December 12, 2021

“You literally have a castle and you spend your time doing this,” podcaster Rob Rousseau wrote.

“What a weird hill to die on Rowling,” producer Brett Erlich added.

A third chimed in saying that Rowling was focusing her attention on the wrong part of the story about rapes in Scotland, highlighting her prejudice and fixation.

“The vast majority of sexual assaults are committed by men who don’t identify as anything other than men. Perhaps you might consider using your public profile to combat this instead?” they stated.

The 56-year-old author was first accused of transphobia last June, when she poked fun at an article titled: “Creating a more equal post-COVID-19 world for people who menstruate.”

“People who menstruate,” Rowling mocked. “I’m sure there used to be a word for those people. Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?”

She later insisted “sex is real” before being described by critics as a TERF, or Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminist.

Rowling was lambasted by “Harry Potter” actors, including Emma Watson. She was also excluded from an upcoming HBO Max special celebrating the fantasy films.

However, that hasn’t stopped the Scottish author from expressing her views.

To be fair, when you can’t get a woman sacked, arrested or dropped by her publisher, and cancelling her only made her book sales go up, there’s really only one place to go. pic.twitter.com/MsNWXhWlyc

— J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) July 19, 2021

“Many women are concerned about the challenges to their fundamental rights posed by certain aspects of gender identity ideology,” Rowling stated in a Good Housekeeping interview last December.

However, in her latest dust-up, Rowling also received praise for her comments — with many prominent Twitter users thanking her for having the “courage” to speak out.

She really is a hero.

I don’t care about whatever stupid views she has. Anyone who is willing to stand-up against this tranny lunacy is a hero.

Rowling also likes dogs, just like Hitler

It’s the same with Dawkins. He might believe that fish can magically transform into cats or whatever the hell goofy bullshit, but if anyone is willing to say “NO” to trannies, they’ve got my support.

Dawkins has also basically argued that Moslems should be rounded up and put in concentration camps.

And he never apologizes for anything.

You tell ‘em @RichardDawkins. A brilliant rebuff to a once great organization, the AHA, that lost its raison d’etre and should now just disappear. They forgot that provocative questioning is the heart of humanism. pic.twitter.com/LSg5V5i0BM

— Lawrence M. Krauss (@LKrauss1) December 13, 2021

I think it’s fair to say that all Christians generally dislike the aggressive atheist ideologue Richard Dawkins, who is a grumpy, hateful person.

That said, I think having these kinds of figures in the public is a good thing for Christian society. Criticism is a good thing. Anyone who cannot stomach criticism is not coming from a very strong place, and is not feeling security in his own beliefs. So I have always said that Dawkins should be welcomed and embraced as someone who forces Christians to be able to defend their own beliefs. Christians on the whole have tended to come to the same conclusion, and no Christian has ever tried to have Dawkins silenced.

However, this is not at all true of trannies, a group which Dawkins has also offered some criticism of.

On April 10, Dawkins posted a tweet inviting a discussion on trannies, comparing trannies to Rachel Dolezal, the transracial woman who was vilified by the media for being a white woman pretending to be black.

In 2015, Rachel Dolezal, a white chapter president of NAACP, was vilified for identifying as Black. Some men choose to identify as women, and some women choose to identify as men. You will be vilified if you deny that they literally are what they identify as.

Discuss.

— Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) April 10, 2021

Within hours, the American Humanist Association announced that their board had voted to withdraw a 1996 award that they’d given to Dawkins. They issued a statement effectively saying that it is “not okay” to ever ask any questions about trannies.

Today the American Humanist Association Board voted to withdraw, effective immediately, the 1996 Humanist of the Year award it bestowed on Richard Dawkins.

Tap the preview below to read the board's statement explaining why. https://t.co/VfxMgbISh5

— American Humanist Association (@americnhumanist) April 19, 2021

The following day, Dawkins posted a followup, clearly in response to the pulling of his award and the other attacks he’d received, saying “whoa whoa – I’m just trying to have an academic discussion here, people.”

He said that he is not a “Republican bigot” (i.e., Christian) and is simply interested in the intellectual issues surrounding trannies.

I do not intend to disparage trans people. I see that my academic “Discuss” question has been misconstrued as such and I deplore this. It was also not my intent to ally in any way with Republican bigots in US now exploiting this issue .

— Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) April 12, 2021

However, saying “this is just an academic question” is no excuse. No one is ever, under any circumstances, allowed to say something which could be construed as questioning the nature of trannies.

Dawkins is an example of 1984 in action. In 1984, the party’s own materials are redacted and changed, because the earlier version of the party do not fit the current state of the party.

By 2050—earlier, probably—all real knowledge of Oldspeak will have disappeared. The whole literature of the past will have been destroyed. Chaucer, Shakespeare, Milton, Byron—they’ll exist only in Newspeak versions, not merely changed into something different, but actually contradictory of what they used to be. Even the literature of The Party will change. Even the slogans will change. How could you have a slogan like Freedom is Slavery when the concept of freedom has been abolished? The whole climate of thought will be different. In fact, there will be no thought, as we understand it now. Orthodoxy means not thinking—not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness.

–George Orwell, 1984 (1948)

Richard Dawkins is an earlier version of party doctrine. He was promoted to use “science” to attack and undermine Christianity. But he is a little bit too devoted to science, and now his own doctrine must be cast aside, as we move past science, into a new definition of science wherein no facts are tolerable.

“A man is not a woman” is a form of hatespeech.

Dawkins is cucking out on the tranny thing, just as he cucked out a few years ago on the Islam thing, but he will not be able to simply slip back into the shadows after having questioned trannies. Presumably, he will get the J.K. Rowling treatment, and be erased from history.

It was a bold move, I must admit. As much as I’ve always disliked Dawkins, going out there and questioning trannies, while presumably knowing what would happen, is brave.

That said, the man is Joe Biden’s age, and he is to my knowledge not a smoker, so he may well simply be senile.

It is really a very big ask to demand that people in their 60s and 70s change their core value system. Up until you are 30, and maybe even until you’re 40 if you’re a slow developer, your values are in flux, and you’re maybe trying out different ideas to see what you believe. But once you are in your 50s, let alone your 60s and 70s, it is a very bizarre thing to change your entire worldview.

The tranny thing has only popped up in the last ten years, so Dawkins was asked to change his view after 70. I don’t think anyone can be surprised he failed.

Rest ye now weary, ye anti-Crusder. For thine war hast endeth, and thou has lost to thine own army. 

But Dawkins going under the bus says a lot about the current ideology we are living under: it is fundamentally not solid. The only belief that a true believer can have now is a belief in authority. They can only believe that whatever the establishment says is true, at any time, and if the establishment says something new and different, they have to believe that just as fervently as they believed the previous doctrine.

Therefore, the establishment is going to have a very hard time recruiting intelligent people to their cause. We’re already seeing the backlash from this, where most of the high level people don’t believe in anything at all, and are largely simply driven by outrageous hatred for white men and for normalcy.

There is no real way for the establishment to maintain competence while also flatly denying any type of objectivity.

Back in September when the scam was first unfurling, Richard Dawkins was one of the only public figures to be openly critical of the scamming teen haji Clock Boy.

Following Clock Boy’s demands he be given $15 million for suffering, Dawkins is on it again.

On Tuesday, he tweeted that Clock Boy has no right to the title of Clock Boy.

Don't call him "clock boy" since he never made a clock. Hoax Boy, having hoaxed his way into the White House, now wants $15M in addition!

— Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) November 24, 2015

Dawkins stated the obvious back in September, as was called a hater. He sort of backed down for a bit, then came back. He seems to still hold his original position now.

@Mukhtarishaq2 He didn't make anything. He opened a clock, took out the innards and put them in a box so they looked like a bomb

— Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) November 24, 2015

He was attacked this time by people claiming he shouldn’t be picking on a kid, by rightfully pointing out that it is ridiculous to consider kids above criticism. He compared Clock Boy to teenagers in ISIS.

"But he's only a kid." Yes, a "kid" old enough to sue for $15M those whom he hoaxed.

And how old is this "kid"? https://t.co/kjzxGDs5Az

— Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) November 24, 2015

Idiot women then attacked him for his statements of obvious fact, which apparently caused them emotional discomfort.

@RichardDawkins – am I missing your point? because there's no comparison between deception and murder. Disappointed.

— Lisajane Ellis (@DancinJuicyLane) November 24, 2015

@RichardDawkins I used to look up to you. Your books opened my mind w I was a kid. Now you're doing sloppy reactionary thinking; saddens me.

— Renée Stephen (@ReneeStephen) November 24, 2015

Dawkins has spent his entire live mocking and viciously attacking Christians, and everybody loved it. But as soon as he questions the haji filth and their sick desert cult of doom, he becomes an enemy.

@RichardDawkins @yodat_nioj @oldgrower YEAH, one happens to be a Muslim & the other happens to be a radical Muslim. TOTALLY JUST THEIR AGES!

— Ooze (@ItsTheOoze) November 24, 2015

@RichardDawkins Why do you hate Mulims Mr. Dawkins? For some who upholds reason above all, I find your tweets disturbing.

— boringfileclerk (@boringfileclerk) November 24, 2015

This demonstrates, plainly, that the modern “secular” system of thinking is not actually “secular,” it is merely anti-Christian. Because Christianity is a part of White heritage, and the modern system is based around anti-Whiteness. Someone such as Dawkins who does just genuinely hate all religious people is a rarity, and will go from being a hero to an evil hater as soon as he switches from attacking White beliefs to attacking monkey beliefs.

The way the media has dealt with, and continues to deal with, Clock Boy will definitely make the list for the most insane events of the year.

The liberals are literally still saying that he invented a clock.

Even that slut Megyn Kelly of the Irish New Network is going along with this.

It is incredible how liberal Fox News actually is. Fifty years ago, these people would have been indicted as communists.

If this is true, what was his motive? Whether or not he wanted the police to arrest him, they shouldn’t have done so https://t.co/LtOFAAmVxK

— Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) September 20, 2015

Richard Dawkins was “under fire” as they say for posting a link to the YouTube video showing that Clock Boy is not some type of genius and did not invent a clock. All he did was take a clock apart to make it look like a bomb and then bring it to school.

But drawing attention to this fact is pure hatred.

So Dawkins backed down, because he’s a cuckolded faggot who claims to hate Moslems but will bow down to them if the SJWs demand it.

The Guardian:

Dawkins did not dispute that Mohamed should not have been arrested, but questioned whether the boy had truly “invented” the clock, as has been reported.

…

Mohamed, whose parents are from Sudan, was arrested, handcuffed and questioned by five police officers at MacArthur high school in Irvine on Monday. He was then suspended for three days.

He told MSNBC he was not allowed to call his parents and was accused of carrying a hoax bomb. He said: “I felt like I was a criminal, I felt like I was a terrorist. I felt like all the names I was called.”

But he did build a hoax bomb! This is now a known fact!

There is no possible reason you would unscrew a clock, make it look like a bomb and bring it to school unless you were purposefully trying to cause a panic!

He added: “In middle school I was called a terrorist, called a bomb maker, just because of my race.”

Poor thing. You sweet little dear.

Maybe you should have remained wherever the hell your from.

Oh yeah – Sudan.

Please, go there. No one will call you a terrorist.

Actually, probably if you would have done this exact same bomb hoax thing at a school in Sudan, you’d now be in an adult prison.

In a controversy that largely played itself out on Twitter, Mohamed then received overtures from Silicon Valley tech companies, support from Hillary Clinton and an invitation to the White House from President Obama.

“White House.”

I wonder if Obama is going to invite little Muhammed to the Lincoln bedroom?

Dawkins shamed the poor boy for lying about having invent the fake bomb (or I guess he did invent the fake bomb, but he did not invent either a clock or a real bomb), maybe because he hates Islam, which I guess makes him a racist somehow.

On Sunday, the emeritus fellow of New College, Oxford said he was simply looking for the truth of the Texas schoolboy’s story.

In a tweet, the scientist linked to a YouTube video entitled Ahmed Mohammed [sic] Clock is a FRAUD, in which user Thomas Talbot alleges Mohamed’s clock “is in fact not an invention. The ‘clock’ is a commercial bedside alarm clock removed from its casing”.

In his tweet, Dawkins said: “If this is true, what was his motive? Whether or not he wanted the police to arrest him, they shouldn’t have done so.” His next tweet said of the video: “This man seems to know what he’s talking about.”

See, he even came at it cucked.

If he wanted the police to arrest him for faking a bomb hoax – which seems to be what happened – why would Dawkins say “yeah but they shouldn’t have arrested him for trying to get arrested by faking a bomb.”

Why would you not get arrested for purposefully faking a bomb, even if your intent in faking the bomb was to get arrested?

What logic is that, Richie?

Subsequent tweets, issued against a growing storm of online protest, said: “Assembling clock from bought components is fine. Taking clock out of its case to make it look as if he built it is not fine. Which is true?

“Yes, there are other reasons why a boy might take a clock out of its casing & pretend he’d made it. Trying to impress teachers, for instance[.]”

Linking to an artvoice.com blogpost entitled Reverse Engineering Ahmed Mohamed’s clock … and Ourselves, Dawkins tweeted: “If the reassembled components did something more than the original clock, that’s creative. If not, it looks like hoax.”

He held out for a while, sort of. Then the cucking kicked into overdrive.

Dawkins eventually retreated. He devoted tweets to questioning police motives and tweeted a reference to the new leader of Britain’s opposition Labour party: “Sorry if I go a bit over the top in my passion for truth. Not just over a boy’s alleged ‘invention’ but also media lies about J[eremy] Corbyn.”

In an answer to a Twitter user who wrote: “I think you too frequently confuse ‘truth’ with ‘obsessive and unnecessary dedication to accuracy’”, Dawkins wrote: “That could well be true, in which case I apologise. I guess I’m a bit sensitive about being among the many fooled.”

He subsequently retweeted President Obama’s White House invitation to the boy.

I guess he’s afraid of getting the Watson treatment.

Related: Dr. Watson to Sell His Nobel Prize After Having Been Shunned for Saying Blacks are Not as Intelligent as Whites

I hope he’s going to eventually get so old he just comes out and says “yes, Blacks and Middle Easterners are less evolved, it is a scientific fact.”

But I’m not holding my breath.

.@RichardDawkins You cuck! Why did you retreat! Your feelings??? The little brat staged a bomb hoax! You know that! Why apologize???

— Andrew Anglin (@stormer9k) September 21, 2015

He intentionally caused panic with a fake bomb then claimed to be both persecuted and a scientific genius! https://t.co/3sIIxGjJHQ

— Andrew Anglin (@stormer9k) September 21, 2015

No it wasn't! Why you cuck out? Afraid they're going to do a Watson on you? You're old! Who cares! Grow balls, Rich! https://t.co/uByPOricKo

— Andrew Anglin (@stormer9k) September 21, 2015

You should read his new one "the magic of making a clock look like a bomb" – a bit too pro-Islam but great stuff. https://t.co/hAg6vwPNaC

— Andrew Anglin (@stormer9k) September 21, 2015

.@RichardDawkins Hey Richie Ahmed got invited to the White House and MIT, maybe you should invite him to your house to bang your wife! Cuck!

— Andrew Anglin (@stormer9k) September 21, 2015

While even ISIS has the respect to tell its people to stay in their own countries and not go to Europe, the filthy Saudis have encouraged the invasion, refusing to take any refugees at all. Like the snake Jews, they tell the “international community” it would be a “security risk.”

However, they are happy to spend billions of dollars to build hundreds of mosques in Germany for the use of the people Germany is inviting in to conquer them.

International Business Times:

Germany Daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, quoting a report in Lebanese newspaper Al Diyar, said that the Saudi monarchs, who have been criticised for doing nothing to help the Syrian refugees, have offered to build as many as 200 mosques in Germany for Muslims who have fled war-torn Syria.

KSA reportedly has proposed to build one mosque for every 100 refugees who entered Germany in extraordinary numbers last weekend. The proposal is still pending with the German authorities.

Even as the migrant crisis threatens Europe, the Saudi nation that boasts of being a cradle of Islam has shown little effort to help the desperate refugees.

According to Amnesty International, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Qatar, “have offered zero resettlement places to Syrian refugees,” France24 reported.

This is, quite clearly, part of a conquest agenda. Taking in refugees does not help Islam expand.

Richard Dawkins has accurately referred to the proposal as a sick joke.

The Independent:

Richard Dawkins has branded Saudi Arabia’s reported offer to build 200 mosques for refugees arriving in Germany a “sick insult”.

…

Dawkins, a staunch atheist known for his controversial views on religion, blasted Saudi Arabia for only pledging something he claimed would not directly benefit the welfare of refugees arriving in Germany, branding it “either a sick joke or sick insult to German generosity”.

Yeah, Rich. It’s both.

Saudi contribution to refugee effort: 200 mosques in Germany. Either a sick joke or sick insult to German generosity http://t.co/j0h4XHQZsF

— Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) September 10, 2015

As an evolutionary biologist and mild genius, Dawkins has to know that these people are monkeys. I keep hoping he’ll get fed-up and/or senile enough to say it, like James Watson did.

And though Richard Dawkins does not believe in God, it seems that God was equally as angry as he was by this sick joke, and decided to crush their favorite snackbar.

BBC:

At least 107 people died and more than 230 people were injured when a crane collapsed in the Muslim holy city of Mecca in Saudi Arabia.

The huge red crane crashed into a part of the Grand Mosque – the largest in the world – that was filled with worshippers at the time.

The head of Saudi Arabia’s civil defence said strong winds and heavy rains had caused the collapse.

Mecca is currently preparing for the annual Muslim Hajj pilgrimage.

Hundreds of thousands of people are expected to arrive in the Saudi city from all over the world later this month.

The collapse happened at 17:23 local time (14:23 GMT), said Director-General of the Saudi Civil Defence Authority, Lt Sulayman Bin-Abdullah al-Amr.

It happened at a time when many worshippers were there for Friday prayers.

The toll for the dead and injured, tweeted by the Civil Defence Authority (in Arabic), continued to rise throughout the evening.

Shortly before the crash, the city had been hit by unusually high levels of rainfall and winds of up to 83kph (50mph), Lt Amr said.

Really too much to be a coincidence.

Thanks, Jesus.

Stephen King has again come out and stated his belief that life and the universe are not the result of some sort of weird accident.

The sci-fi and horror writer, who was one of my favorite paperback novelists when I was growing up – this is the case for most people, I’m sure, as the man really does a good job creating fun, entertaining and easily consumed stories – is not in any way religious, but has a both intelligent and unique mind, which allows him to question modern dogma.

During an appearance on HuffPo Live last week, King stated that it’s very unlikely that the Earth and its inhabitants are the result of a coincidence.

“The very construction of the world and the fact that we seem to be the only blue-populated planet in the universe — and we’ve been looking for quite a while now, at least since the late 50s — it makes you have to believe that if we happened by accident, it would make winning the lottery look like flipping a coin,” he told the liberal goofballs.

“It’s so complex,” he added. “So I have a tendency to believe in intelligent design.”

“I love the idea that there could be a power greater than myself that’s sort of writing the script,” he went on. “I try to live my life by saying that God may be watching out for me, but I still had better only cross when the little man turns white.”

This follows statements made to NPR last year, when King explained that you basically have to be a borderline retard to believe that all of everything arranged itself in perfect order as a result of an accident.

“I choose to believe it. … I mean, there’s no downside to that,” he said. “If you say, ‘Well, OK, I don’t believe in God, there’s no evidence of God,’ then you’re missing the stars in the sky and you’re missing the sunrises and sunsets and you’re missing the fact that bees pollinate all these crops and keep us alive and the way that everything seems to work together.”

I hope more intelligent public figures come out and criticize the liberal dogma of atheism. Conversely, I hope Richard Dawkins finally breaks down and states the obvious conclusion of Darwinism, which is Blacks and other non-Whites are unevolved and thus subhuman and unfit to live in White society.  I think he is on the verge of doing it.

The hum of the hive-mind. If you thought it was loud at the Guardian, you should try the New Statesman. Or maybe you shouldn’t. You might get tinnitus. Particularly if you read an article by the famous religious leader Richard Dawkins, who leads the world-wide cult of liberal atheism. He’s been writing about the greatest miracle on earth — the Miracle of Human Equality. In fact, this miracle is even bigger than I previously realized:

Human beings have only recently shown how very special they are. Fifty thousand years ago we had the same bodies and brains as today and we probably had language. But we didn’t have much by way of art, and our artefacts were limited to the functional — stone tools for hunting and butchering, for instance. (Apes with big brains: Richard Dawkins on what makes us human, The New Statesman, 6^th January 2013)

So Dawkins thinks that it’s only “probable,” not certain, that human beings had language fifty thousand years ago. It follows, then, that he thinks language is a supernatural phenomenon, floating free of biology and genetics. After all, those ancient humans had the “same brains” as we have today. If language depended on the brain, Dawkins would conclude that ancient humans certainly had language. He doesn’t and so, to the chief liberal atheist, language must be a supernatural phenomenon.

Culture must be supernatural too:

That changed around 40,000 years ago, when the archaeological record shows a sudden magnificent flowering of art and even musical instruments. Cultural evolution — which outpaces by orders of magnitude the superficially similar genetic evolution that had given rise to our big brains in the first place — went into overdrive. Next came the transition from the hunter/gatherer to the settled agriculture way of life, soon to be followed by cities, markets, governments, religion and war. The Industrial Revolution expanded cities to megalopolises, propelling our species to worldwide (and potentially disastrous) domination, and even to reach out to the moon and planets. (Apes with big brains)

Heavens! Those huge cultural advances took place without any influence on or from the genes. None whatsoever. It was all done with the “same brain” (contra Cochran and Harpending) even though some of those advances were confined to particular regions and are still unevenly distributed around the world (per J. Philippe Rushton). Science is a European invention, for example, and White Europeans have contributed by far the most to its development. Look at Charles Darwin, the Great Prophet of the Liberal Atheist Cult: he was English, just like his disciple Dawkins. But Darwin would have been very surprised to hear that all groups of human have had the “same brain” for “fifty thousand years.”

This is because Darwin understood that there are differences among the races. He believed that race was a real and important part of human biology and that different races had different brains. Inter alia, he didn’t think much of the intellectual capacity of Blacks (see here). Richard Dawkins and other liberal atheists reject Darwin’s “racism and bigotry.” They’ve applied pure reason to human evolution and deduced the existence of a huge miracle lasting thousands of years over the entire earth’s surface, from sunny Tahiti at sea level to chilly Tibet on the heights. This miracle has kept the human brain identical in all human groups, despite what appear to be quite different evolutionary pressures over long periods.

If Dawkins is the Pope of the Liberal Atheist Cult, then Nick Cohen is one of its leading cardinals. Both men firmly oppose race differences and sex differences, while firmly claiming to support science. They also support mass immigration. Here’s a short quiz to test whether you too can apply pure reason to the effects of mass immigration on sexism, science and free speech:

1. Blacks, Muslims and other non-Whites commit sex-crimes at much higher rates than Whites. Mass immigration by these groups into the United Kingdom will therefore be:

a) Good for women.
b) Bad for women.
c) Neutral for women.

2. Blacks and Muslims have made no important contribution to modern science, disrupt the education of scientifically skilled groups and consume tax-revenue that might otherwise be spent on science. Mass immigration by these groups into the United Kingdom will therefore be:

a) Good for science.
b) Bad for science.
c) Neutral for science.

3. Blacks, Muslims and other non-Whites despise free speech and react to criticism with hostility and violence. Mass immigration by these groups into the United Kingdom will therefore be:

a) Good for free speech.
b) Bad for free speech.
c) Neutral for free speech.

How did you do? Give yourself 10 points for every a, 0 points for every b and 5 points for every c. Now check your score:

0-10 points: Blasphemy!
15-20 points: Bad, but not blasphemous.
25 points: Good, but not un-Godly.
30 points: Congratulations! You’ve shaken off the shackles of outmoded superstition and embraced pure reason.