What’s next? Pink triangles and work camps? Actually, that sounds pretty good tbh fam.

Only some sort of bigot would object to university scholarships being granted to people based on their perversions. It’s not discriminating against normal people at all.

After all, discrimination can only be against minorities.

Homophobia is prejudice + power, or whatever.

Perth Now:

The furore over Sonia Kruger’s latest controversial remarks has reignited the debate over so-called “reverse discrimination”.

When the television host slammed an LGBTI scholarship on Today Extra yesterday morning, she tapped into a deep chasm in popular opinion over which Australians deserve a helping hand.

Speaking out against a $7000 scholarship being reserved for a lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender or intersex high school student, Kruger argued that sexuality should not have anything to do with the selection process and scholarships “should be given on merit”.

It’s not even her first offence against political correctness. If she wasn’t a woman, she’d probably already be in jail, considering Australia’s cucked system.

Professor Michele Grossman, the Director of the Centre for Cultural Diversity and Wellbeing at Victoria University in Melbourne, says the concept of reverse discrimination is “a pretty shaky one”.

Every. Damn. Time.

“What it tries to describe as a concept is that the tables are simply turned, so a group that previously might have been seen to have an unfair advantage or privilege has now been flipped to the bottom of the pack,” Prof Grossman said.

But, she said, in the decades since efforts to address inequality began, there was no evidence that this had happened.

Really, you troll-faced Jew? There’s no evidence that Australia, who was once a White-supremacist state where brown people were not even allowed to immigrate to, is now any different? There’s no evidence that Whites are being passed over in favor of ethnic minorities and degenerate freaks?

It’s unsurprising that they actually had to trot out a Jewish “diversity” expert in order to refute this notion of “reverse discrimination.” No gentile could lie so bold-facedly without blushing.

Compare that Jew’s face with Sonia’s. What more evidence do you need?

On 15 January 2014, the BBC told us that Chris Wood, an Ofsted inspector, had suggested that teachers had ‘not paid enough attention to poorly performing white children for fear of being seen as racist.’

The BBC added:

“Ofsted was now urging schools to focus on white working class children, amid concerns they are getting a raw deal.”

The BBC then quoted Mr Wood thus:

“There is a much clearer focus on the performance of different groups of pupils who are eligible for free school meals, with white British being a clear focus group that we have identified…

I would argue in the past that was not the case and it could very well be because of a certain discomfort about talking about that group for the reasons you have suggested, around it being seen as an extreme view. But that is changing and we are certainly putting additional focus on that area.”

The Beeb also quoted Lib Dem MP for Bradford East, David Ward:

“Is there any evidence that anyone is actually speaking up for the white working class? I get representatives from the Bangladeshi community complaining about ‘our children in our schools’ or the Pakistani community or the Kashmiri community.

I find it difficult to think of a representative for the white working class who comes to me and says ‘what about our children’… if they are, THEY ARE PROBABLY THE BNP or would be accused of racism.”

Kevan Collins, chief executive of the Education Endowment Foundation, said this:

“Our best teaching is serving our more affluent children.”

Those would be the children of oh-so-caring socialists like Tony Blair, Harriet Harman and Diane Abbott, one supposes. You know, those who, as they masqueraded as our representatives, imported millions of foreigners against our will. To do the jobs they said the white working-classes ‘didn’t want to do any more.’

And those we did. And those we could no longer do because, for more than half a century, British teachers ‘had not paid enough attention to poorly performing white children for fear of being seen as racist.’

They put the foreigner a long way before us, didn’t they? They gave them our council houses, our jobs, our small businesses, our big businesses, our culture, security, heritage, our history, they even sacrificed our children.

They gave them everything.

As they stole it all from us.

Now they seem to be pretending that they didn’t know they were doing it.

Ladies and gentlemen, when a Lib Dem MP feels obliged to say that the the only people who ever dared to speak up for ‘white working class’ schoolchldren were ‘probably the BNP,’ those who stole our world must be growing fearful. The PC elite would seem to be trying to score some brownie points with the victims of their decades-long foreigner-first largesse before the inevitable backlash begins.

What do you think? Should we forgive their trespasses against us?

Maybe. That is what we are after all. Despite the never-ending accusations of ‘racism,’ ‘homophobia,’ ‘anti-Semitism’ et al, we are, actually, just about the kindest, trusting, most tolerant and forgiving folks on the planet. Just ask your average immigrant who they’d rather live with, their own kind in the world they and their ancestors made or us in ours.

Kindness, trust, tolerance and forgiveness hasn’t done much for us just recently, has it? Despite which, I’d still expect the British, even now, to forgive a parliamentarian who came clean about the results of half a century of treachery. Oh yes, we’d forgive a great deal for the odd truthful confession from a penitent bad lad.

But what about your children? Would you forgive his trespasses against them?

That’s what I hoped you’d say.

James Harding, the BBC’s news director, has said its output should “look and sound more like its audiences”.

“We are going to have to be very determined to address diversity on air and, equally, off it,” he told staff at New Broadcasting House in London.

The former Times editor also announced the creation of a new News Editor post to “drive the daily agenda”.

He added there would be a “news impact fund” to aid the BBC’s pursuit of original journalism.

“We will use the fund to free people up to devote the time and the resources to stick with a story,” he said during an internal briefing on Wednesday.

The recent scandals involving Jimmy Savile and Lord McAlpine, Mr Harding continued, should not make the BBC “shy away from investigative reporting and the coverage of difficult issues”.

“In fact, we must renew our commitment to curious, inquisitive journalism in the public interest.”

New editors for education and health will also be appointed, with one to be based out of Birmingham or Salford.

Mr Harding said the corporation should provide more news on sports, personal finance, arts and culture, and promised to “beef up” the Ouch team, which reports on disability news.

“The BBC must strive,” said Mr Harding, “to provide the best news services to disabled people across the country: to bolster disability news reporting, we will put real resources behind our Ouch team – delivering first online, but across radio and TV, too.”

In addition, he pledged, there would be an increased presence for world and local news on the national news output and that the corporation would keep pace with the “galloping technology revolution”.

“The consumption of news is changing before our eyes,” he said. “To meet the expectations of our audiences, we need to be available everywhere, for everyone, now.”

Mr Harding said Mishal Husain joining Radio Four’s Today team and Ritula Shah’s lead presenter role on The World Tonight were positive steps in terms of broadening diversity on air but that there was much more to be done.

“We’ve got to be clear we’ve got a problem,” he told staff. “We’ve got an on-air issue. I, personally, think we’ve got an even bigger one off-air.”

But Mr Harding said he was “extremely reluctant to impose quotas, because in the end it’s not empowering to the people who get those jobs.”

He said there should be “more of an effort” to get people moving within the BBC, in an effort to improve diversity, revealing that “an editor will be expected to move after six years, and definitely after eight”.

However, Mr Harding insisted the BBC’s News division must “continue to live within its means” and needed to find “at least a further £20 million in savings”.

“The reality we face, like so many other services and businesses, is we are going to have to deliver more for less.”

Wednesday’s briefing marked James Harding’s first statement of intent since taking up his role as director of news and current affairs in August.

He began his career at the Financial Times in 1994 before joining The Times in 2006 and becoming its editor the following year.