Related: Spanish Serial Kisser Resigns as Australian Police Vow to Investigate Illegal Peck

There’s a really easy way to not be exposed as a dirty whore – don’t be a dirty whore!

The Guardian:

Spanish police have arrested three unnamed Real Madrid reserve players for allegedly distributing a sexual video featuring a minor, with the arrests heightening the furore about sexism and male behaviour in Spanish football.

The players, who are not minors, were released following a court decision and after the data on their mobile phones was seized, police said in a statement on Thursday.

The case stems from a complaint filed by the mother of a 16-year-old girl in the Canary Islands regarding an alleged recording of sexual relations, police said. They added that while the girl maintained the relations were consensual, the recording took place in June without her consent and that she had recently become aware of it.

…

According to El Confidencial newspaper, the main subject of the probe is a player in the third team, who allegedly recorded his sexual relationship with the 16-year-old.

All three are suspected of committing a felony known in Spanish criminal law as “revealing secrets of a sexual nature”, a police spokesperson said.

LOL.

It’s “revenge porn” with a very Spanish name!

Both laws mean “it’s illegal to expose a dirty whore as a dirty whore.”

Remember those feminist protest signs that said “teach men not to rape instead of teaching women not to get raped”?

Well. 

At least they’re not being charged with “rape” because she’s 16. The Americans would try that bizarre game. (The age of consent in America is 16, at least in most states, but don’t ever try it – they will figure out some way to punish you. In this case, they would have charged them for “child porn,” and in many cases, men get charged for giving the girl alcohol. Of course, they will figure out some way of punishing you for having sex with any female, so maybe it’s a moot point.)

The Spanish are saying that there are as many as 20 players involved with distributing the video. It’s not clear if she had sex with all 20, but knowing what I know about women, I would assume that she probably did.

Canteranos del Real Madrid denunciados por difundir un vídeo sexual con una menor.

(Se habla de que podría haber una veintena de involucrados, todos mayores de edad) #SeAcabó pic.twitter.com/v8Q5MO3B83

— Cecilia Grierson ⭐️⭐️⭐️ (@ceciliaencina) September 14, 2023

“Apuntan que puede haber más jugadores implicados, incluídos del Primer Equipo (Del Real Madrid) por compartir el vídeo sexual con la menor”

La difusión de vídeos sexuales sin consentimiento es delito, que la víctima sea menor es un agravante. #SeAcabó pic.twitter.com/lY5OrLYD6o

— Cecilia Grierson ⭐️⭐️⭐️ (@ceciliaencina) September 14, 2023

Just as women are obsessed with having sex with serial killers and spree-shooters, they are obsessed with trying to have sex with entire sports teams. There is a word for women who want to have sex with men who may kill them – “autassassinophilia.” There should be a word for women who want to have sex with entire sports teams – “multiathletaeophilia.”

In terms of the whole “revenge porn” (or “exposing sexual secrets”) thing… if you’re going to give women the full and total benefit of the doubt on this, then it has to only be valid when the video is secretly recorded. At least that makes some kind of sense. But if during sex, you’re holding the phone and she sees the phone and doesn’t tell you to put it away, I just can’t possibly comprehend how it can be a crime to share the video.

Why does she think you’re recording it, if not to share?

So many of these laws come down to “women are retarded, and it’s illegal to not treat them like retards who don’t know anything at all.” I’m actually okay with that being the basis of the legal system, but if this is the core assumption, then women should not have rights at all. Either they’re empowered and the same as men and deserve all the same rights as men, in which case they have to be held responsible for their actions, or they are retards incapable of any form of personal responsibility, in which case they can’t have all these same rights as men.

Based on the current situation, where women are advertised as being just as capable and intelligent as men, it is only logical that a woman is capable of assuming that if you are recording her during sex, at some point, people are going to see that video. Obviously, no man would allow a sex act to be recorded unless he was comfortable with the world seeing it.

In the pre-feminist era, there would maybe be an argument here, which would be “you should have known that women are retarded.” But everything in society, all the time, is telling us that women are definitely not retarded, and their legal rights are shaped around the assumption that women are not retarded.

There’s no internal consistency with any of this feminist stuff. It goes both ways – women have more power than they used to and they have less responsibility than they used to. It would not work to only go one way or the other, so feminism has to do both at once.

Elvis Dunderhoff contributed to this report. 

In another sign of absolute social decay, the civil court system has begun issuing insane and moronic judgements that can obviously never be paid.

Alex Jones was hit with a billion dollar judgement, and I’ve heard that some other political dissidents have been hit with ridiculous and obviously unpayable judgements.

Firstly, a judgement is supposed to reflect damages. Secondly, it is supposed to be payable. What these civil judgements do is effectively give people life sentences to work as indentured servants, which is clearly a constitutional violation.

No slut got $1.2 billion in damage because someone posted a nude video of her, and no random dude has $1.2 billion to pay her (the guy is black, by the way – the woman is a “Jane Doe” because she’s a sex victim). This is just not serious. It is purposefully cartoonish in nature, intended to make a mockery of the justice system itself.

If the woman wasn’t a Jane Doe, the defense probably could have presented evidence that she is already doing OnlyFans, because basically every woman does that.

Houston Chronicle:

A Harris County court awarded a woman $1.2 billion in a lawsuit she filed against an ex-boyfriend who posted sexually explicit images of her online, KHOU 11’s Anayeli Ruiz reported.

The Katy woman, identified as Jane Doe in court documents obtained by KHOU 11, accused Marques Jackson of “revenge-porn conduct” and years of harassment, including spying on her using home security cameras and impersonating her online. “It’s been about two years or three years. It’s been painful and scary,” Jane Doe said.

Per court documents filed in April 2022, the couple began dating around 2016 before moving to Chicago together so Jackson could pursue a job opportunity there. They had a “long and drawn out break up starting in early 2020 before the COVID-19 pandemic” and officially ended the relationship around October 2021.

Jackson allegedly kept “intimate visual material” from their time together and even logged into Jane Doe’s mother’s home surveillance system to spy on her after she moved back to Harris County. He also allegedly stole money from her bank account and interfered with a loan application.

Bradford J. Gilde, Jane Doe’s attorney, claimed in the suit that Jackson’s behavior escalated when he became “delusional and paranoid” that Jane Doe was having a relationship with a mutual friend. Per court documents, Jackson posted images of Jane Doe on a pornographic site, a publicly accessible Dropbox folder, and various social media pages where he impersonated her. He sent links to Jane Doe’s friends, family, and colleagues and contacted her directly from fake phone numbers.

Please note that if he actually stole money from her, that would be a criminal offense, which he was never prosecuted for. This is “supporting evidence” that the person is bad and has bad intentions.

This case, and this judgement, was about nude video he posted on the internet.

The court system and the media constantly does this – they list off other alleged bad behavior in describing the case, but don’t make it clear that this information, though presented in court, was not the thing that is being punished.

I remember that during the January 6 prosecutions, this behavior of the court system and media made it so a person could walk away from reading an article thinking that it was a crime to believe in QAnon.

They would say “the man who entered the Capitol was also a believer in QAnon conspiracy theories,” as if that was part of what he was being charged with, rather than evidence entered by the prosecutor to prove malicious intent for the actual charges, which were related to “disrupting an official proceeding.”

“You will spend the rest of your life trying and failing to wipe yourself off the internet. Everyone you ever meet will hear the story and go looking. … Happy Hunting,” he stated to her, as cited in court documents.

…

Gilde and his co-counsel, Jacob Schiffer, said that although it’s not likely Jane Doe will ever receive the full $1.2 billion she’s owed, they’re pleased with the verdict. “It was about sending a message to the world,” Schiffer said. “Do not mess with Texas and do not mess with Texas women.”

The justice system is not supposed to be “sending messages.” That is what a lynching is supposed to do. The justice system is supposed to dispense justice. (Granted, you do have “broken window theory” and so on, which does to an extent involve punishment that is in a way intended to send a message, but it isn’t cartoonish punishment, as the terms exist in real life.)

This woman did not lose a billion dollars because he posted her nudes, and she did not spend a billion dollars on therapy. A billion dollars is not in the man’s capacity. At some point they are going to start saying “order to pay a zillion dollars” and these Jew lawyers will say “it’s not real, it’s just a symbol.”

It just shows how illiterate Americans are on the basic nature of the legal system that they would go along with this.

Frankly, this whole “revenge porn” thing is a bizarre Black Mirror type thing. It sort of makes sense on its face, maybe, but if you are a woman and you agree to be filmed nude, you should be aware that this could potentially end up on the internet when you eventually decide to screw the guy over.

It’s immoral to post nudes of your ex-girlfriend on the internet. But there are a lot of things that are immoral, and you cannot legislate this sort of interpersonal behavior. You just end up with weird tyranny.

Also, let’s be real: this is just more feminism, a way to empower women. A man being able to say “I’ll post that shit on the internet” gives him some advantage over a woman, and the reason these laws exist is that in our culture, men are never allowed to have any ability to push back on a woman.

Seems reasonable enough.

RT:

Meta, the new name for Facebook Inc., has co-developed a platform that asks people to submit their intimate photos and videos in order to prevent them from being used as ‘revenge porn’ on Facebook or Instagram.

The tool is for “adults over 18 years old who think an intimate image of them may be shared, or has already been shared, without their consent,” Meta said in a blogpost on Thursday.

The new platform, which Meta developed together with the UK Revenge Porn Helpline and 50 other NGOs, aims to prevent the publication of ‘revenge porn’, rather than just removing the delicate files after they’ve already appeared online.

Concerned users are being asked to submit photos or videos of themselves naked or having sex to a hash-tagging database through the StopNCII.org (Stop Non-Consensual Intimate Images) website.

The special hashtags, or “digital fingerprints,” are then assigned to those materials by the tool, and can be used to instantly detect and curb attempts to upload them online by the perpetrators.

Meta said that the system had been developed “with privacy and security at every step.” Only the hashtags are being shared with StopNCII.org and the tech platforms participating in the project, while the explicit images and clips never leave the user’s device and remain “securely in the possession of the owner,” it assured.

I’m not sure what the purpose of this is. I doubt it’s just the Pakis who work at Facebook being perverts. Maybe it’s that. But it seems more likely it’s some kind of biometrics thing.

I think we can safely say it’s not to stop revenge porn.

Well, this is a relief.

I was worried that the judge was going to ban me from my daily sessions of masturbating to nude images of Katie Hill, which along with Jen Psaki ASMR, is really the only thing keeping me sane.

RT:

A judge has tossed a lawsuit by former representative Katie Hill, ruling that her nude photos that were leaked to the media amid claims she had affairs with staffers were not revenge porn, but covered by the freedom of speech.

Los Angeles Judge Yolanda Orozco sided with the Daily Mail as she ruled on Wednesday that naked images of Hill taken by her ex-husband Kenny Heslep and leaked to the paper “were a matter of public issue or public interest,” since they were indicative of Hill’s “character and qualifications for her position.”

BASED Latina natural conservative ftw.

Orozco noted that the photos in question showed Hill with a campaign aide, with whom she reportedly had an affair at the time, as well as appearing “to show [her] using a then-illegal drug and displaying a tattoo that was controversial because it resembled a white supremacy symbol.”

The judge rejected the argument by Hill’s attorney that the paper could have just limited its scoop to describing the images without publishing them, calling such reasoning “unpersuasive.”

“The fact that information to be gleaned from an image may be disseminated in an alternative manner does not equate to a finding that the image itself is not a matter of public concern,” Orozco said.

The story made headlines in October 2019, and ultimately resulted in Hill’s resignation despite the outpouring of support she received from her own party and the mainstream media that rallied to her defense. Facing accusations that she had multiple affairs on the job, including with her legislative director, Hill admitted to a relationship with one female campaign staffer, but rejected any other allegations of inappropriate behavior. She vowed to take the British tabloid, which exclusively published the images, including the one showing her smoking a bong naked and spotting what appeared to be a swastika tattoo, to court, arguing she was a victim of “revenge porn.”

It’s not a Swastika (and it’s concerning that RT thinks it is, actually) – it’s an Iron Cross.

But I’m pretty sure it is a Nazi symbol.

Maybe RT was confused, thinking that the Swastika that was featured inside the Iron Cross military award during the Nazi era was visible in the tattoo.

But it isn’t.

But I don’t know what that could be other than a Nazi-related symbol.

I don’t think if she was a fan of the Kingdom of Prussia, she would get a tattoo of a symbol that is now so strongly associated with Nazism.

What a weird story this was.

It was also interesting, because it proved that feminism trumps association with Nazism. You know, we do wonder about these things – about the order of the various grievance groups, and who trumps who.

For example:

• We know that Moslems are above white homosexuals because Antifa has attacked white homosexuals for having a gay pride parade through a Moslem neighborhood
• We know that blacks are above Latinos because of the prosecution of George Zimmermann for defending himself from Tray-Tray Martin
• We know that feminism CAN in certain cases trump both Jewishness (most of metoo) and blackness (Bill Cosby) – however, this one is less clear, because blacks have gotten away with “sexual harassment” much easier than whites would in various situations
• We know that anti-Russian sentiment trumps Nazi sympathies, as in both the Ukraine and the Baltics, neo-Nazi groups have been endorsed by the West and NATO because they were anti-Russian; in Estonia, World War II parades that celebrate Nazism (and attack Russia) have been praised by the media
• We know that transsexual men are way above white women, as evidenced by everything, and probably, a white male transsexual is above any race of woman
• We know anti-Semitism trumps blackness, as evidenced by attacks on Louis Farrakhan, Kanye West, Nick Cannon, et al.
• We know that supposed historical oppression of India (colonialism) trumps global warming, as the Paris Climate Accords show and as Greta Thunberg herself has stated (that used to be true of China as well, but it isn’t anymore)
• We know that Asians are virtually exempt from any form of grievance politics, as evidenced by attacks on Chinese racism, use of affirmative action against Asians, and others (nonetheless, the new “anti-Asian hate bias” campaign the media has launched is trying to use black attacks on Asians to attack whites)
• We know that vaccines trump blackness, as evidenced by concerted campaigns against black anti-vaccine efforts claiming that the vaccination agenda is representative of white oppression of blacks

The fact that the media sided with Katie Hill after the printing of the nude photos proved that being a AWFL trumps associations with Nazism.

However, at the same time, AWFLs have been labeled “Karens” and attacked as anti-black racists for being afraid blacks were going to attack them, or being upset that blacks were committing various crimes.

Most infamously, a woman alone in Central Park with her dog thought a black man – who claimed to be a bird watcher – was going to rape her and called the police. (There is a Wikipedia page about this incident.)

She was disgraced as a white racist hater, despite the fact that I’m very certain she had BLM stuff all over her social media.

She really got wrecked – she was fired, and this is going to be a stain attached to her for the rest of her life (or as long as this current system lasts).

So according to current logic, if we take the Katie Hill nudes and the Central Park Karen incident alongside each other, thinking a black man is going to rape you is worse than being a Nazi.

But let’s take a step back here: just even wanting to classify this logically is probably the wrong approach. It is right-wing, white male thinking to say “give me an ordered list of who is the most and least oppressed, and whose grievances trump whose grievances.”

I don’t think any of the bulletpoints I outlined above actually represent any definitive policy or ideological belief, I think they just signal pragmatism: everything is always against heterosexual white men, but when the grievance interests collide, the rulers just choose whatever is more beneficial to the bigger agenda.

I think this is the biggest problem that right-wing people have with the left: there is no internal logic or consistency to any of it. It is all based in feminine drives and Jewishness (which is itself a feminine drive), and feminine drives are entirely based on emotionalism. There is no consistency in emotionalism, as it is entirely based on an arbitrary feelings-response to any stimuli.

The media is capable of manipulating emotional responses, completely. That is how they’ve used the empowerment of women, and the de-masculinization of men to create a system where nothing that happens has a requirement to make any sense. As long as women, and other emotional people, can be swayed by a media presentation, the presentation works.

Consensus on Irrational Nonsense

Along with making decisions based on emotions, women are obsessed with consensus. Therefore, the media is very capable of forming consensus around things that make no sense.

Anyone could have seen that the lockdowns would be much more damaging to society than the virus, based on all of the official data presented by the establishment. That was clear as soon as the hospitals were empty during the initial two week “flatten the curve” event. But the consensus formed was that it didn’t matter how many people suffered or died as a result of the lockdown, because the only thing that mattered was lives lost from the virus.

Glenn Greenwald – who is a homosexual, and thus totally paranoid about germs – was on Tucker Carlson the other day to talk about having been robbed at gunpoint at his weekend home in Brazil.

(Here is the article Glenn wrote on the topic, though I haven’t read it because save for a few special occasions, I don’t read any contemporary internet nonfiction prose as a rule, because I don’t want it to influence my own writing.)

He said that as a journalist, he didn’t like writing about himself, but decided to write about the robbery because he’d seen the video of the little Vietnamese girl talking about how her family was robbed and how she can’t sleep because she thinks the robbers are coming back.

During that robbery event, the mother of the family says that one of the black robbers whispered in her ear something to the effect of: “we’re not going to kill you or rape you, we just don’t have any money because of the virus.” That didn’t mean much, because one of the other blacks was pointing the gun at the little girl and saying he would kill her. But I guess it did mean something, because no one was killed or raped.

The video of the girl is really moving, actually.

(There is actually probably some commentary on race that could be said here, given that a white girl presumably would not be able to compose herself and speak on the event in such a straightforward way.)

If the media wanted to, this video of the Vietnamese could be used to create an emotional consensus that:

• The lockdown is a crime against humanity
• Black people are violent animals

It is all completely arbitrary.

If I had control of the media for one day, I could form an emotional consensus belief about all of my personal issues within a couple of hours. Then, when the media was turned back over to the Jews the next day, they could reestablish their own positions in the same timeframe.

It is all totally arbitrary.

Greenwald notes that much of the crime that is happening is a result of the lockdown, and that the consensus put a taboo on talking about the effects of a lockdown in contrast to the supposed effects of the supposed virus.

The lockdown is a part of the rising crime phenomenon, and the lockdown is doing other horrible things. But the main driver is the BLM movement. That is another emotional consensus that makes no sense at all.

Look at this:

Those murders are virtually 100% black-on-black, and they rose at such a rate because of the BLM movement.

If you were a racist, and you wanted to kill as many black people as possible, you would create the BLM movement to defund the police.

But the media has created the emotionally-driven consensus that anyone who believes the police should exist at all is an anti-black racist. Despite the fact that it is simply an objective reality that defunding the police (as well as removing cash bail and “prison reform”) has led to mass black deaths.

This brings us back to the bottom line: there is no logic in this system. You can’t unravel the logic of it, because there isn’t any logic in it. What that means in practical terms is that there is literally no purpose in attempting to push back against this system using logic. Not anymore. There was a purpose to that in 2015, because the information was not widely available, and in some cases, the arguments weren’t available at all. That changed with /pol/ and (not to toot my own horn) the Daily Stormer (which is mostly ripped off of /pol/) turning these arguments and facts into repeatable sound bites.

At this point, everyone who is capable of being swayed by logical arguments already has been. The only thing left to do now is to figure out some way to build a counter-consensus. The MAGA movement, including QAnon and others, are ripe for that, but they are flailing around, swallowing up disinformation.

Your woman can do whatever she wants, whenever she wants. If she wants to divorce you and destroy your career, finances, and social life, she’s in her right to do so.

There should be nothing you can do to stop her.

Daily Mail:

Threatening to publish ‘revenge porn’ is to be made a specific criminal offence for the first time.

Anyone threatening to leak sex tapes or other explicit images of someone without their consent will face up to two years in jail.

Publication of lurid and pornographic images of an unwitting victim, such as a former partner, has been a crime since 2015.

The proposals will now make it illegal to threaten to carry out such acts.

Keeping women in a constant state of pregnancy is, to date, what provides the best chance at preventing them from destroying everything.

If you’re going to blackmail them… well, we can’t instruct you on that.

But, in a completely unrelated event, a court would probably look down pretty harshly on a video of her beating up the kids. Especially if you’ve got a good lawyer.

Some Jews from the Jewish rape gang

The lawyer of the British woman who was recently arrested after accusing 12 Jews of gang-raping her in Cyprus says that the spreading of videos of her having sex with Jews is a bigger offence than the charges she’s facing for allegedly falsely accusing 12 Jews of rape.

I agree.

Videos of white women having sex with Jews are indisputably worse for the planet than white women falsely accusing Jews of anything.

Daily Mail:

Rape charges against Israeli teenagers were dropped by police after footage showing the British woman who made the allegations ‘asking for the door to be closed’, one of the men claimed.

The 19-year-old British woman told police she was gang-raped by the 12 men in Cyprus before changing her story to say she was upset when three of them filmed her during consensual sex.

She later insisted she is the victim after video of the sexual encounter was circulated online.

One of the freed 12 boys told of his delight at being released – and insisted she had consented to sex.

Yisrael David told reporters as he landed back in Israel that she had agreed to sex with him and several others after a night of wild partying in Ayia Napa.

The woman, who is not being named, has since withdrawn her claim of rape and is facing charges in Cyprus of public mischief amid claims she made up the sex attack.

Aren’t women supposedly able to withdraw consent at any time? That’s what we’re told on a regular basis here in the West. Besides, even if they had consensual sex and there is video evidence of that consent, they could have still raped her after that.

A video was made of the alleged attack in which the woman was said to have been filmed smiling while having sex with one of the men – in footage that has since been widely circulated.

Her lawyer Andreas Pittadjis said spreading the video was a bigger offence than the charge the British teenager is facing.

But Yisrael, one of those accused of gang-rape, said she had agreed to group sex and the videos shown to police in Cyprus had proved their innocence.

‘In none of them [the clips] does she look like she’s suffering or shouting for help,’ he said in an interview with Israel’s Channel 12.

‘The police saw a tape in which you can see that the door is being opened and instead of yelling for help and saying she was raped, she says ‘close the door.’ A woman who is being raped doesn’t say that.’

Describing the incident, Yisrael said: ‘I was in the room, yes.… That evening we saw our friends whom we met there with the woman.

‘We went up to her room, 723, and we were with her there in the room. You saw the videos. We were three in the room and there were more people outside who wanted to come in, who came in, and went out.

‘They didn’t actually do anything but they did see and were part of everything that went on there.’

…

Andreas Pittadjis, the lawyer who is representing the teenager, demanded to know who had leaked the video as she appeared in court Tuesday charged with public nuisance, for which she now faces a year in jail.

…

Speaking outside court, he said: ‘The offence my client is accused of is not considered to be one of the most serious offences in our criminal system.

‘The fact that the video of my client appears to have gone around the world is a much more serious offence.

‘I want to know who leaked this video and why?

‘This sort of crime is punishable by more than a year in prison. Someone should investigate – both here and in Israel.’

Yeah, who could have leaked the videos? AND WHY?

The mysteries of our time.

It’s easy to find one of the videos online.

In the video from the above screenshot, one of the Jews laughs and giggles as he shows goyim men how God’s Chosen People rule over goyim women too.

Although not shown in the clip, it’s clear from her red ass that she was spanked profusely.

This is the current state of white women. They are getting spanked in orgies with Jews in random countries all around the world. It’s why they travel.

You know who are the real rape victims here?

White men.

White men who didn’t consent to their women getting fucked and ruined by foreigners yet are lost in inaction after being brainwashed into absurd tolerance.

There’s just something about seeing Jews giggling and laughing as they show you how they fuck a white blonde teenage woman that should make your blood boil.

If we don’t dominate our women, they will look for domination elsewhere.

It looks like Congressman Joe Barton has been victimized by the crazy kike Laura Loomer!

What a strange story this is. Sexually graphic footage of Republican Congressman Joe Barton has been leaked online. Apparently Barton sent a private video showing himself masturbating to a woman he was sexually involved with. That footage is now out in the wild.

Other than being a disgusting out of shape old man who exercised poor judgment, it’s hard to say that he did anything wrong. The worst you could say is that he committed adultery but even that stance is flimsy. Barton says he recorded the footage while separated from his wife while they were in the middle of a divorce. It’s hard to blame the old man for wanting a piece of ass while his divorce went through. It looks like he’s been victimized in a weird case of revenge porn.

The craziest part about this is that the devious kike Laura Loomer is taking credit for obtaining the video and leaking it to Alex Jones. Jones desperate for clicks and attention decided to post the footage.

I've given video footage of @RepJoeBarton to @infowars.

Let it be known that MORE than just a d**k pic exists. I didn't want to post the video online until we learn more about the details of his text exchange (it could be consensual) but the vid is now in @RealAlexJones's hands.

— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) November 22, 2017

Loomer is claiming that this story is in the public interest because Barton was separated but still married to his wife when he recorded the footage. This according to her represented “cheating” and had to be exposed.

.@RepJoeBarton cheated on Americans with #DACA, and now he's been caught cheating on his wife. So much for being a "Conservative". #DrainTheSwamphttps://t.co/KOk7CWfxoX

— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) November 22, 2017

Let’s be honest though, is footage showing some old man jerking off really in the public’s interest? That seems highly doubtful considering the context. This was something that occurred between two consenting adults. What’s most significant about this is that Loomer and Jones may have violated revenge porn laws.

In 2015, Texas passed a law against revenge porn. It looks like Jones may have realized that he broke the law by posting the footage because it is no longer available on his site.

Laura Loomer is one ugly kike bitch! Whatever you do, don’t put her photos through MakeApp! Her appearance without make up causes graphical processors to melt! They can’t handle her ugliness!

And then we have the question of how Loomer was able to get this footage to begin with. Was she the one having sex with Barton? A serious question considering some of the insanity she’s been involved with. If not, who gave her the footage? These things will probably come out eventually so Loomer should just come clean with the facts!

Barton has said that he has no intention of resigning from Congress over the situation. He might be the standard cuckold establishment Republican, but everything indicates that he was the victim of a crime here. It honestly wouldn’t be a surprise to see him file some lawsuits. Loomer and Jones should watch out as they could be in some trouble over this.

And I thought Laura was in trouble when she got caught lying about her tire!

A new bill in California could make it illegal to upload videos and photos to what are called revenge porn websites. Revenge porn is big business. Hunter Moore built a strong online presence with his now-defunct site “Is Anyone Up.” The New York Times reports that he made up to $10,000 a month off of advertising for the site. He later sold the site and also landed in the middle of an FBI investigation. But, what exactly is revenge porn and what does the law do to protect against it? Find out below.

What is revenge porn?

Endrevengeporn.org says it’s defined as photos or videos taken or filmed without the subject’s consent. This can also include videos of sexual assault. Photos and videos of a sexual nature received within a relationship can also count as revenge porn if they are posted without the subject’s consent.

They are usually posted by ex-boyfriends, ex-lovers or ex-husbands.

What effects can it have on victims’ lives?

“It’s just an easy way to make people unemployable, undatable and potentially at physical risk,” University of Maryland Law professor Danielle Citron told the New York Times.

Marianna Taschinger, 23, told the publication that she had to give up her job and was stalked as a result of an ex-boyfriend posting nude photos of her online.

Read More