The cellphone-brain tumor pipeline was something that was talked about a lot when cellphones first became popular. Then people sort of stopped talking about it because it just didn’t seem like it was happening.

However, it’s possible it just took a while to show up.

Fox 5 New York:

New UC Berkeley research draws a strong link between cell phone radiation and tumors, particularly in the brain.

Researchers took a comprehensive look at statistical findings from 46 different studies around the globe and found that the use of a cell phone for more than 1,000 hours, or about 17 minutes a day over a ten year period, increased the risk of tumors by 60 percent.

Researchers also pointed to findings that showed cell phone use for 10 or more years doubled the risk of brain tumors.

Joel Moskowitz, director of the Center for Family and Community Health with the UC Berkeley School of Public Health conducted the research in partnership with Korea’s National Cancer Center, and Seoul National University. Their analysis took a comprehensive look at statistical findings from case control studies from 16 countries including the U.S., Sweden, United Kingdom, Japan, Korea, and New Zealand.

“Cell phone use highlights a host of public health issues and it has received little attention in the scientific community, unfortunately,” said Moskowitz.

…

Many studies looking into the health risks of cell phone use have been funded or partially funded by the cellular phone industry, which critics argue can skew research results.

“Moskowitz emphasized that these studies have been controversial as it is a highly sensitive political topic with significant economic ramifications for a powerful industry,” Berkeley Public Health noted.

…

Experts also suggested when not in use, putting the phone in airplane mode, which turns off cellular, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth.

When on a call, experts advised avoid holding the phone up to your head and instead use the speaker feature or a headset.

Experts also said you should reduce or avoid use of your phone when there’s only one or two bars displayed showing the strength of connectivity. “Cell phones put out more RF energy to connect with cell towers when the signal is weak,” health officials noted.

That’s also true when using a mobile device in a fast-moving car, bus, or train because the phone emits more RF energy to maintain connections to avoid dropping calls as it switches connections from cell tower to cell tower.

Ultimately, when it comes to cell phones, “distance is your friend,” Moskowitz said. “Keeping your cellphone 10 inches away from your body, as compared to one-tenth of an inch, results in a 10,000-fold reduction in exposure. So, keep your phone away from your head and body,” he advised.

…

Moskowitz, who has been researching and writing about the dangers of radiation from cell phones and cell towers for more than a decade, said publication of his findings have consistently led to increased calls for continued research. “…as soon as those stories went public in the media,” he said, “I was contacted from survivors of cell phone radiation begging me to stay on this topic.”

Even if the phones aren’t really causing brain tumors (and it doesn’t seem like they really are on any scale, given the amount of time that this number of people have used them), all of this electromagnetic noise is clearly affecting our bodies in negative ways.

One would assume that after more than a hundred years of messing around with X-rays, scientists and doctors would already be aware of this.

But one would be mistaken.

Study Finds:

X-rays have been a staple of modern medicine for a long time, and any doctor or radiologist is quick to tell their patients that there are absolutely no risks or harmful side effects associated with the radiation necessary to perform an X-ray. Now, researchers from Erasmus University Medical Center and Oncode Institute in the Netherlands have discovered that low doses of radiation, long believed to be safe, did in fact create breaks in lab grown human cells that allowed additional DNA to enter the chromosome. In more simplistic terms, the radiation caused mutations on the cellular level.

To be clear, these findings do not mean that going to have an X-ray is going to harm you, and extensive further research is necessary involving actual living animals, and eventually humans, before any real conclusions can be drawn. Still, the results of this study at the very least are concerning, and seem to indicate that there are still some aspects of how radiation interacts with our bodies, on a cellular level, that science has yet to fully understand.

High doses of radiation are almost certain to cause mutations in the exposed, often leading to cancer, or even worse symptoms in extreme circumstances. This happens because ionizing radiation creates double-strand breaks in cells that allow excess DNA to enter. These extra pieces of DNA usually make their way to the nucleus, leading to cellular mutations. Most of the time, these extra bits of DNA are leftovers from completed natural processes, such as genomic DNA repairs or viral infections.

For this study, researchers wanted to see if low, generally considered safe, doses of radiation would have any negative side effects on lab-grown human and mouse cells. As far as X-rays go, the radiation doses used in this experiment were comparable to the “upper range of common diagnostic procedures.”

After exposing the cells to the radiation, it was observed that mutations, via inserted DNA, had indeed taken root in the cells. Surprisingly, these low doses of radiation actually caused mutations in the cells “more efficiently” than higher doses had in previous studies.

Wisdom teeth pain? X-rays.

Your kid fell to the ground while playing? X-rays.

Pain when moving your wrist? X-rays.

Grandma says the weather is hard on her bones? X-rays.

The problem with all of these modern medicine things like X-rays, which don’t result in an immediate and visibly observable negative effect on the human body, is that it’s hard to accurately lay the blame on something after 20 or more years have passed.

What if that one X-ray someone got when she fell in the park when she was 5 years old and her shoulder was hurting was a key factor in the breast cancer and thyroid problems she developed later in life?

How would researchers track and measure the consequences of X-rays?

What about cell phone radiation?

What about Wi-Fi?

Pictured above is the Jewish Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on one of her better days.

Earlier this year, there was a great deal of speculation about the Jewish Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Due to health problems, she was unable to appear in person for court hearings. There was also a severe lack of transparency surrounding her health status. This led to people theorizing that she might already be dead, replaced with a body double or whatever.

Well now she’s reportedly just been treated for pancreatic cancer and completed three weeks of radiation treatment.

New York Post:

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has undergone radiation treatment for a malignant tumor that was discovered on her pancreas – and there is “no evidence of the disease elsewhere in her body,” the Supreme Court said.

The 86-year-old on Friday completed a three-week course of stereotactic ablative radiation therapy at Manhattan’s Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, according to the Supreme Court.

“The Justice tolerated treatment well,” said the Supreme Court, which added that Ginsburg has canceled her annual summer visit to Santa Fe, “but has otherwise maintained an active schedule.”

The treatment started on Aug. 5 and was administered on an outpatient basis to treat the tumor.

According to the Supreme Court, the “abnormality” was first detected following a routine blood test in early July and a biopsy performed on July 31 “confirmed a localized malignant tumor.”

It’s reasonable to assume that this evil old bitch doesn’t have much longer to live. She’s in her 80s and they’re radiating her body to keep her alive.

The Jew-left is freaking out about these developments.

Just take a look at some of these insane tweets.

Bless this heroine. Some days it feels like she is all that stands between us and the abyss. #NotoriousRBG https://t.co/ZlSMW5daLZ

— Amy Siskind 🏳️‍🌈 (@Amy_Siskind) August 23, 2019

If vampires are real they have a moral duty to turn Ruth Bader Ginsburg immortal.

— Jennifer Wright (@JenAshleyWright) August 23, 2019

First thought: She was seen at the Yiddish version of “Fiddler on the Roof” in NYC last week. She’s gonna be fine.
Second thought: HOLYMOTHEROFRBG!!EVERYBODY, RIGHT THIS SECOND, JOIN A MOVEMENT, CAMPAIGN, GRASS ROOTS GROUP -WHATEVER – AND WORK NONSTOP BTWN RIGHT NOW & NOV 2020! https://t.co/PRsFGXGFYG

— Michael Moore (@MMFlint) August 23, 2019

This may be the biggest and most portentous news on an already tumultuous day.
All good wishes to Justice Ginsburg, of course. But this could be prelude to an absolutely titanic battle.https://t.co/G4NDBwrzmf

— David Axelrod (@davidaxelrod) August 23, 2019

Sending strength and respect to the powerful and indomitable RBG.https://t.co/D8RBajMCou

— Jill Wine-Banks (@JillWineBanks) August 23, 2019

We should all hope that she dies sooner rather than later. These people are going to have an absolute meltdown if Donald Trump is given the opportunity to replace her. They’ll be foaming at the mouth like rabid dogs both in real life and on the Internet.

If you thought they acted insane during the Brett Kavanaugh hearings, you haven’t seen anything yet. If Trump chooses her replacement, even if he selects a moderate Republican figure, it will represent a major generational shift in the makeup of the Supreme Court. Plus, the chances of Roe v. Wade getting overturned will increase substantially.

Of course, we don’t know exactly when this old hag will die, but it is hard to see her sticking around much longer.

I honestly can’t wait to celebrate her death. It will be a great day when she finally dies. Perhaps as great if not greater than the day John McCain died.

Even the tiniest mistake during an operation to extract over 1,300 fuel rods at the crippled Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan could lead to a series of cascading failures with an apocalyptic outcome, fallout researcher Christina Consolo told RT.

Fukushima operator TEPCO wants to extract 400 tons worth of spent fuel rods stored in a pool at the plant’s damaged Reactor No. 4. The removal would have to be done manually from the top store of the damaged building in the radiation-contaminated environment.

In the worst-case scenario, a mishandled rod may go critical, resulting in an above-ground meltdown releasing radioactive fallout with no way to stop it, said Consolo, who is the founder and host of Nuked Radio. But leaving the things as they are is not an option, because statistical risk of a similarly bad outcome increases every day, she said.

RT: How serious is the fuel rod situation compared to the danger of contaminated water build-up which we already know about?

Christina Consolo: Although fuel rod removal happens on a daily basis at the 430+ nuclear sites around the world, it is a very delicate procedure even under the best of circumstances. What makes fuel removal at Fukushima so dangerous and complex is that it will be attempted on a fuel pool whose integrity has been severely compromised. However, it must be attempted as Reactor 4 has the most significant problems structurally, and this pool is on the top floor of the building.

There are numerous other reasons that this will be a dangerous undertaking.

– The racks inside the pool that contain this fuel were damaged by the explosion in the early days of the accident.

– Zirconium cladding which encased the rods burned when water levels dropped, but to what extent the rods have been damaged is not known, and probably won’t be until removal is attempted.

– Saltwater cooling has caused corrosion of the pool walls, and probably the fuel rods and racks.

– The building is sinking.

– The cranes that normally lift the fuel were destroyed.

– Computer-guided removal will not be possible; everything will have to be done manually.

– TEPCO cannot attempt this process without humans, which will manage this enormous task while being bombarded – with radiation during the extraction and casking.

– The process of removing each rod will have to be repeated over 1,500 times without incident.

– Moving damaged nuclear fuel under such complex conditions could result in a criticality if the rods come into close proximity to one another, which would then set off a chain reaction that cannot be stopped.

What could potentially happen is the contents of the pool could burn and/or explode, and the entire structure sustain further damage or collapse. This chain reaction process could be self-sustaining and go on for a long time. This is the apocalyptic scenario in a nutshell.

The water build-up is an extraordinarily difficult problem in and of itself, and as anyone with a leaky basement knows, water always ‘finds a way.’

‘Trivial in light of other problems at Fukushima, water situation could culminate in the chain reaction scenario’

At Fukushima, they are dealing with massive amounts of groundwater that flow through the property, and the endless pouring that must be kept up 24/7/365 to keep things from getting worse. Recently there appears to be subsidence issues and liquefaction under the plant.

TEPCO has decided to pump the water out of these buildings. However, pumping water out of the buildings is only going to increase the flow rate and create more of these ground issues around the reactors. An enormous undertaking – but one that needs to be considered for long-term preservation of the integrity of the site – is channelling the water away, like a drain tile installed around the perimeter of a house with a leaky basement, but on an epic scale.

Without this effort, the soils will further deteriorate, structural shift will occur, and subsequently the contents of the pools will shift too.

Read More