A 19-year-old woman has been arrested over a wild rampage at a Hindley Street McDonald’s. Bystanders filmed her grabbing food and drink from behind the counter, before she was arrested. 7NEWS Adelaide at 4pm and 6pm | https://t.co/8ftPfGgvkq #7NEWS pic.twitter.com/54pITVxSqc

— 7NEWS Adelaide (@7NewsAdelaide) December 30, 2022

America is a racist hell-hole.

If you don’t believe it, then just go ahead and try to help a McDonald’s cook while being black.

See what happens.

New York Post:

A woman has been arrested after she was seen in a viral TikTok video screaming at McDonald’s staff before jumping the counter and making herself a burger.

The 19-year-old — who has not been publicly named and shamed — was subsequently charged with disorderly behavior, property damage and assault over the incident, which occurred in Adelaide, Australia, last week.

The cause of the crop top-clad customer’s outburst was unclear, but the TikTok clip showed her hurling abuse at stunned employees.

“I will beat you up or I will leave!” the unruly patron can be seen shouting in the video, which has clocked more than 75,000 views.

The woman then wanders into the back kitchen, where she nonsensically screams at more staff before making herself a burger.

She later helps herself to a bottle of water from inside a refrigerator before eventually being detained by two cops.

In racist America, which is run by Aryan White Supremacists (who have total control over everything, including the banks and the media), black people can’t even help someone without the full force of state violence coming down on them.

It’s shocking.

Blacks have the highest rates of obesity, highest rates of drug usage, highest rates of violent crime, highest rates of illiteracy, highest rates of pitbull-ownership, and the lowest IQs of any race.

But the thing that’s killing them is white people being mean.

The College Fix:

University of Minnesota Professor Rachel Hardeman has received $800,000 to study “racialized police violence” and its association with “adverse reproductive health outcomes.”

The money came from two separate grants for one project, according to information from the National Institutes of Health database. The research promises to “[center] racism as a fundamental cause of health inequities.” Hardeman is also on the board of a regional Planned Parenthood.

The “Community Events and Pathways to Inequities in Birth Outcomes” project has a timeline starting from April 2021 to March 2025. But, the project is only budgeted until March 2022.

“Hardeman plans to announce the results of the research as they become available over the next five years,” a university statement said. “The findings will be shared through journal and news articles, conferences, policy briefings and reports, and community presentations.”

“The results will be needed by healthcare delivery systems, community organizations, and policy makers to inform efforts for ensuring reproductive health equity,” University of Minnesota said.

“The findings will offer a more complete picture of the ways that community trauma, structural racism, individual-level physical and mental health consequences, and population-level disparities affect reproductive health outcomes,” Hardeman (pictured) said.

The money is on top of a $4.7 million grant Hardeman and the University of Minnesota received for a new “Center for Chronic Disease Reduction and Equity Promotion Across Minnesota.”

That center should not be confused with a separate “Center for Antiracism Research for Health Equity” Hardeman created with the Big Ten university and seed money from insurance company Blue Cross/Blue Shield. These ongoing studies will be conducted through the university’s Minnesota Population Center.

Understanding “everyday experiences of Black women” is essential “to developing effective public health strategies that disrupt the pathways from racialized police violence to population health inequity and advance the goal of preventing pregnancy-related complications and reducing maternal and infant death,” Hardeman said in a news release.

The College Fix asked for confirmation on if the two grants were for one project and how she would control for correlation versus causation.

“Dr. Hardeman isn’t taking this type of interview request at this time,” spokesperson Keelia Silvis told The Fix about the taxpayer-funded studies at the public university.

One of her papers says ‘racist policing’ is linked to preterm birthsOne paper Professor Hardeman has released said “racist policing practices hurt birthing people and their babies,” according to the Big Ten university’s news release.

The study found an association between communities that have frequent police contacts and preterm births. Yet its own results show that white and black women had higher preterm births in areas with frequent policing, but black immigrants did not experience the same problems.

We’re already like, 80% of the way to a utopia.

Just gotta finish off the home stretch here.

This is from 8 years ago. It’s probably over 100% by now.

Long hair is generally not allowed in wrestling at all, certainly not in competitive wrestling. For presumably obvious reasons.

This is a situation that would have been considered a little bit funny, which has turned into an anti-racist witch hunt by the media.

Ebony:

Alan Maloney, the White referee who forced, Andrew Johnson, a Black high school wrestler to cut his dreadlocks before a match, will no longer work in the Buena Regional School District. According to Good Morning America, David Cappuccio, a New Jersey superintendent decided at an emergency meeting earlier this week.

Maloney was placed on indefinite suspension after the dreadlock-cutting incident was recorded and shared on social media.

A black wrestler was ordered to cut his dreadlocks or forfeit the match.

A referee told Andrew Johnson at a high school wrestling match to cut off his dreadlocks or forfeit the match. The referee named Alan Maloney, who had ordered to cut off his hair, was suspended. pic.twitter.com/gq2LmeCU2c

— EHA News (@eha_news) December 25, 2018

Cappuccio addressed the controversy in a letter on the high school’s website writing, “The Staff and administration within the Buena Regional School District will continue to support and stand by all of our students and student-athletes.”

Following the posting of the letter, a meeting was held at Buena High for a vote on “personnel matters.” However, Cappuccio made a decision on the viral haircut before the group addressed it.

“He’s done working with our district,” the superintendent said, according to WPVI.

Johnson’s family was at the meeting and their lawyer Dominic A. Speziali said the wrestler was “emotionally drained” from the embarrassing incident.

Speziali wrote in a statement, “The blame here rests primarily with the referee and those that permitted him to continue in that role despite clear evidence of what should be a disqualifying race-related transgression.”

Here is the rule, from a standard high school wrestling rulebook:

Note that the alleged skin-hate victim was only forced to cut the hair that couldn’t be covered by the ear covers (this is a picture of him after the incident):

The assumption is that forcing black people to follow the same rules as white people is a form of racial hatred.

The reason that this sort of thinking exists is that if you did not create situations like this, you would no longer be able to claim that racism exists.

Because racism, as the kind that is advertised as existing, really does not exist. No one is going around trying to hurt black people’s feelings on purpose. This simply is not a thing.

I have been globally promoted as the world’s number one nigger-hater, because I believe in racial separation. And I wouldn’t force a random black person to cut his hair for no reason. What purpose could that possibly serve?

The implication here is that white people have an underlying desire to hurt black people for no specific reason. We are even told that white people want black people to be criminals, even though white people end up being victims of that criminality, simply because we are so mean, that we put harming black people over our own safety.

Does this make sense to anyone?

Have you ever met anyone like this? 

Maybe I’m just disconnected from the reality of this form of racism because I am a different kind of racist, but I have certainly never, in all my years as being labeled the world’s number one hater, ever met a single person with a desire to hurt the feelings of black people out of pure meanness.

I have joked about that, but I have joked about it in a transparently satirical way, mocking the image of racists that is presented by the Jewish media.

I think that there needs to be a clear distinction between “racists” like myself who believe in racial separation due to the biological incompatibility of blacks and whites and the theoretical racism of people who allegedly simply want to hurt the feelings of black people out of pure mean-spiritedness.

Again – I have no evidence that the latter type doesn’t exist, I have simply seen no evidence that it does exist, and every case of it presented by the media is clearly a hoax.

This wrestling referee was simply following rules about hair-length that I think everyone can basically understand. I would think that anyone who knows what the sport of wrestling is would be able to intuitively gather why this rule exists.

If the current definition of “racism” is “applying rules that were written for everyone to black people,” then okay. Fine. But I don’t think that it is fair to associate this with either:

1. Inexplicable hatred for the color of the skin, or
2. Political “racism” which seeks separation of the races due to scientifically measurable racial differences

“Black people should have to follow the same rules” racism is then a third type of racism, which is associated with neither skin-hatred or a political and scientific perspective on race.

And it should also be made explicitly clear to everyone in society, perhaps through a series of public service announcements, that it is socially unacceptable to expect black people to follow the same rules as everyone else. Because I am quite certain that this wrestling referee was not aware of this new rule, and if he had been aware of it, he would have simply let the black wrestler break the rule.

The assumption that this random guy was holding a secret hatred for the color of the skin, and that this was his reasoning for forcing a black person to follow the same rules as everyone else, is completely insane. No serious person could believe that claim.

It is utterly absurd on the face of it.

All of this is to say: I do not think that anti-racism should be allowed to operate in secrecy. Anti-racists, now possessing a phenomenal amount of power in our society, should be forced to reveal exactly what premises they are operating under to the entire society so that the general public is able to follow all of these new rules they’ve created.

One has to imagine that the only reason they have not made this new set of rules explicit is that if they did, everyone would follow these rules in order to not get fired or suffer other social consequences, thus making the position of anti-racist action squads superfluous.

However, it is simply unfair that such a powerful new regulatory body is able to function in absolute secrecy.