The brown person who left his babies to fry in a hot car is back in the news!

Daily Mail:

A New York father whose one-year-olds died after he left them in a hot car while he worked an eight-hour shift has been spared a jail sentence after pleading guilty to reckless endangerment.

Juan Rodriguez pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor of two counts of second-degree reckless endangerment but was told that he would be jailed if he was arrested within the next year.

Rodriguez said he thought he had already dropped the twins, a boy and a girl, off at their usual day care before he went to his job at a Bronx hospital last July.

Investigators say Rodriguez parked  him silver Honda Accord with his infants, Phoenix and Luna still in their carseats.

The weather on that July day was in the 80s Fahrenheit with temperatures in the car up to 50 degrees higher.

It wasn’t until after finishing work that he realized the twins were still in the back of the car.

Last year Rodriguez pleaded not guilty to two counts each of manslaughter, criminally negligent homicide and endangering the welfare of a child.

I don’t really care about this story, but there is a lesson within, which you must learn.

I can do it in bulletpoints:

• Brown people have low IQs because they come from areas that didn’t require forward planning to survive. A warm climate does not punish people who do not have the intelligence to plan ahead for the winter.
• Lower IQs lead to a higher death rate because they do stupid things like accidentally forget to not kill their babies.
• The higher death rate means that they have to have more children to continue their race.
• In order to have more children, they need to be more horny, which means they need higher testosterone.
• Higher testosterone leads to lower impulse control and a higher propensity for violence.

That’s it.

Right there.

Your entire “race problem.”

You do not need any Marxist gibberish to explain why these people are poor and violent and tend to do very badly in white societies. It’s just a very simple thing that any 8-year-old child could understand.

Furthermore, there is nothing “hateful” about understanding these facts, because knowing the truth cannot ever be “hateful.” Someone who understands these facts can actually be more compassionate towards these people, and understand that they are not going to succeed in a white culture, and need to be returned to their own countries where they can structure their own culture in a way that jives better with their biology.

As long as they’re here, they’re going to be frustrated and we’re going to be frustrated.

We need to peacefully get them out.

Jordan Peterson made waves about a month ago when he decided to write a post addressing the dreaded JQ. He has since updated his post with some more research.

A recap first though: to BTFO le edgy right-wingers epic style, Jordan Peterson decided to bring up divergent human evolution as an explanation for why Jews are so overrepresented in positions of power and wealth in the West.

He conceded the Alt-Right claim that races exist by advancing the theory that the Jews were the superior master race due to their higher IQ – and therefore deserved to rule over the goyim.

My analysis of the so-called "Jewish question" has been criticized by exactly the people you would expect to criticize it. I responded today with an update, making the mathematical case linking higher IQ to higher Jewish achievement properly: https://t.co/3DvVo0f0Q7 pic.twitter.com/SRPYugFKjV

— Jordan B Peterson (@jordanbpeterson) April 25, 2018

Jordan Peterson’s Blog:

Update April 24 2018: A recent critic attempted to take my argument apart arithmetically:

He stated: Different ethnic groups act in a nepotistic manner at differing levels. Some do so more than others.

Your argument is essentially that identity politics does matter not. But it does to Jews, who’s religion and ethnic identity are especially important to them. They even base their whole identity around their victimization in the past by gentiles (Romen Empire, Christians, the Holocaust). Yet, you’re trying to tell us those who play into identity politics are losers? That’s the first problem I’m seeing because even Jews don’t believe that.

Second, if Jews are high IQ, and that means they are more likely to be in positions of power, that would explain their prevalence. Yet, there are VASTLY more white gentiles that have equal or higher IQs than your average Jews. We can do simple math to prove this. If there are 6 million Jews in the United States with an average IQ of 115 (so 3 million are 115+) and there are 200+ million white gentiles with an average IQ of 105 IQ (so roughly 30% are 115+ IQ). So 200 million x .30 gives us 60,000,000 whites with an IQ of 115+. So, we would think, if all things being equal, then that whites would proportionally represented in positions of power commensurate with their IQ and numbers. Jews should, according to the idea that IQ leads to representation in positions of power, should be 5% or so of millionaires (3 million Jews / 60 million gentiles at 115+). But this is not the case. Jews make up a disproportionate number of millionaires and billionaires (40% according to Forbes) according to the IQ theory Jordan B. Peterson is utilizing.

What explains this? Ethnic nepotism, i.e. identity politics. Jews priviliege others Jews with access to power, money, and positions to perpetuate Jewish influence in America.

Yet, Jordan Peterson is telling us there is no idea of Jewish power in America. That’s simply not true when we all know the world runs on money, and no one knows this better than the Jews. That’s why our foreign policy has been about securing Israel’s security. That’s why our politicians get money from AIPAC. Why we send billions to Isarel every year. Why our relationship with the Muslim world has declined because of this one-sided affair.

Jordan Peterson had me fooled, I must admit. I thought that he was trying to fight the Alt-Right. Now, I realize that he is playing the long game. He was always trying to get us to hone our arguments and in true Socratic fashion to tease out the truth slowly and logically to red-pill his fans. The man is /pol/ incarnate.

Don’t believe me? Check out his “rebuttal”:

Here’s my response:

Your cutoff for high IQ is far too low. Try 145 (the figure I cite for serious intellectual advantage) and see how that works. That’s three standard deviations above the general population of mean of 100, not the 115 (one standard deviation) you used. One standard deviation above the average is helpful — it puts you in college — but it’s nothing compared to three standard deviations (in part because of the operation of the Pareto principle).

Three standard deviations advantage for the general population puts an individual at 99.9%. That’s .001 of the population, so .001 X 200,000,000 (using your figures) = 200,000 “white gentiles” with an IQ of 145 or more.

Two standard deviations advantage for the Jewish population (with an estimated mean IQ of 115) means an IQ above 97.7% of the Jewish population. That’s .023 of the population, so .023 X 6.000,000 = 138,000

138,000/(200,000+138,000) = 138,000/338,000 = 40.8% of the 145+ IQ population is Jewish. And you said “40% of millionaires and billionaires are Jewish.”

Isn’t it something how those figures dovetail?

So are we still following at home?

It’s simple. JBP made the claim that IQ was the best predictor of success in society in a previous post. He then DOUBLED DOWN in his latest post. AND he drew people’s attention to the fact that Jews are the 1% that rules the world!

All in one masterful stroke, he confirmed the Alt-Right’s beliefs and gave them the academic backing that we so desperately needed. Damn, I am impressed.

Even more, he basically called every single black person an illiterate ape that should be deported back to Africa.

Makes sense right? Follow Peterson’s impressive and Alt-Right approved train of logic with me here for a second.

Divergent human evolution – different human races – different IQ levels – smart Jews dominating all of society. 

Now, let’s see what happens when we tweak the formula a bit.

Divergent human evolution – different human races – different IQ levels – dumb niggers contributing nothing of value to civilization.

This is what Peterson is driving at – this is what he wants people to realize. He’s playing it safe, by couching it in terms of praising the Jews. But people will start asking questions about IQ and race now. If Jews are a super-smart race, perhaps blacks and browns are not?

Genius. Absolutely genius.

I had my doubts about the professor before, but this is truly 5D chess at play here. By pointing out that Jews run the world and that blacks and browns are stupid, Jordan Peterson is red-pilling millions of future Stormers.

I was wrong to critique him, before.

He was always in this for the long haul, and I should have realized that. Welcome back to the Alt-Right, Dr. Peterson – sleeper agent extraordinaire.

And you will be again, thanks to Dr. Peterson

Sieg Heil, comrade.

Recently, I’ve noticed many whites taking up behavior that is more common among American negroes. These practices and appearances should be avoided by our people. Some of them may seem unimportant or petty but the little things make a difference in our society.

#1 – Leaving your grocery cart in parking spots or medians: This causes damage to cars, looks messy, and causes unnecessary resources to retrieve them.

What Whites should do: When you finish loading your groceries in the car be sure to return your cart to the appointed areas. These are easily accessible and will only take you an extra minute or two.

#2 – Having conversations/phone chats while blocking parking lots, sidewalks, or walkways/aisles: This is a real annoyance, especially for people on a tight schedule. It is terribly rude and shows a total disregard for other people’s time. It’s even worse when someone needs to say “excuse me” several times before the person(s) moves out of the way.

What Whites should do: When you run into a friend or acquaintance in a public space or answer your phone and begin to converse, be sure to move to an area out of the way. (Example: If you’re in the grocery store, move to the side so that you are not blocking the aisle.) While you want to focus on the person you’re talking to, always remain aware of your surroundings and keep your ears open. When someone says excuse me, be sure to move immediately and be apologetic.

#3 – Being consistently tardy to work or school: This one is increasingly a problem in the modern work place. It shows a lack of organization and zero respect for the time of your customers, coworkers, and boss. This also prevents you from moving up the ladder and increasing your pay.

What Whites should do: Show up to work/school on time. In fact, make it a habit to show up ten minutes early. If there is the rare occasion when you are running late, make sure you call the office to let them know. This should never happen more than once or twice a month.

#4 – Wearing too much cologne: This one is directed at gentlemen. One of the worst things is a man who sprays or splashes too much cologne or body spray. It agitates people with asthma or allergies and is largely unnecessary. It’s also not as attractive as men think. Unless you’re trying to attract mudsharks.

What whites should do: Use sparingly. There is no need to bathe in it. And for God’s sake, if you use cologne, do not buy Axe body spray. That’s one of the most African products you can use. If you smell so bad you need that much artificial scent, you either have a medical problem or need a bath.

#5 – Being a lousy tipper: Anyone who has ever spent any time as a waiter or waitress knows that sick feeling when a group of negroes are seated at one of your tables. You’re guaranteed to get at best a handful of change for even the best service. Sadly, I’ve heard of this behavior now coming from our people. This is unacceptable and gives our race a bad name. It’s selfish, rude, and cheap. It does nothing to advance our people especially when the waiter/waitress is one of our own.

What Whites should do: Be a generous tipper when quality service is provided. Don’t just leave them your spare change or the average 10-20%. Give over and above, especially if they are one of ours. Also, try your best to tip them in cash instead of your card as they might avoid some taxes that way. One more thing, this is about more than just tipping. You should treat this person with the utmost dignity and respect. When they are going the extra mile, heap praise on them. Go so far as to speak to their manager about how great they did and then give them a big, generous tip. It’ll make their day and give our people a great reputation.

#6 – Playing loud music in your vehicle: This one should be familiar to all of us. It’s a pretty day and you’re out for a walk or relaxing on your porch when suddenly you hear the deep, thumping African beats in the distance. Before you know it you are surrounded by the vulgar sounds of negro ghetto culture. What could make this worse? How about your teenage son or your daughter’s boyfriend behind the wheel of that car? Sadly this happens everyday in our white suburban neighborhoods. This behavior is 100 percent unacceptable coming from our people. It is crude and shows a total lack of respect for others.

What Whites should do: For one, our people shouldn’t be listening to the typical negro garbage that blares over most car speakers. Secondly, whatever you’re listening to should be turned down to a reasonable volume. No one else needs to hear your music and you should especially keep the volume down when driving through neighborhoods or small towns. Lastly, you should care how people view you. When most people see a person driving around with the speakers blasting, they get certain impressions about that person. They view them as thuggish, trashy, and perhaps are even frightened or intimidated. This disrupts the peace of our communities and must stop.

#7 – Habitually playing the lottery: The problem here is not necessarily with the occasional player. The problems start with those that play every week or even several times a week. You’ve all seen it. You go into the 7-eleven to get a drink and you end up waiting in line for 15 minutes simply because a bunch of negroes are playing the lottery. Unfortunately, the participants in this foolish game include many of our own. This is highly irresponsible behavior. It shows a shortsightedness that isn’t part of who we are. This is a waste of resources that should be going towards savings, bills, paying off debt, food, or clothes. Most anything would be a better use of your dollars than a stupid game you stand almost zero chance of winning. Even if you do win, your irresponsible habits won’t go away. You’ll be broke again in a few years.

What Whites should do: Don’t play the lottery. Ignore it and use your money for more constructive things. Let the lazy, stupid negroes have the whole program. If it were up to me, I’d end the whole enterprise. If you get an urge to buy a ticket, put the money you would normally spend in a jar. See how quickly it adds up and then use it for something worthwhile. Don’t throw any more money in the toilet. To hell with the lottery!

#8 – Wearing excessive jewelry: The blacks call it “bling”. This is a term used often in negro culture. It is seen by them as a status symbol, a symbol that shows you’ve risen to the top of the ghetto pecking order. Sadly, white men have picked up on this cultural trend and are adorning themselves in all sorts of “bling.” Gold chains, earrings, flashy watches, bracelets, various piercings, rings, and even grills. All of this looks ridiculous, trashy, childish, and thuggish. No one can take you seriously when you’re strutting around like a hood rat recently out of jail. It may be a status symbol for negroes but it drags down Whites to the lowest common denominator.

What Whites should do: Less is more. Keep it toned down and limited to only a couple of pieces. Obviously, wedding bands are acceptable. If you’re a Freemason or have a class ring, this is acceptable. A watch is great but it shouldn’t be covered in diamonds and such. No visible necklaces or chains but a cross or religious symbol under your shirt is fine. Men shouldn’t have piercings so take out those sparkly, old earrings from the 90’s and move on. The ultimate point here is that a man should never try to bring attention to himself. Adorning yourself in all this “bling” makes you nothing but white trash and no one will respect you. Whites should strive to demonstrate their status by advancing in their career, carrying themselves with dignity, standing for what is right, starting a family, becoming active in church, and practicing self-discipline. Enough with the “bling.” It’s time to grow up.

#9 – Accumulating large amounts of debt: It’s one of the easiest things to do. You get that credit card in the mail and before you know it, you’ve maxed out 3 of them and you’re signing up for another. A credit card seems to make life easier. Short on cash? No worries, buy that new flat screen with the MasterCard. Want to impress your friends at the bar? Pay for everyone’s drinks with your Visa. Trying to impress the ladies? Get financing on that Camaro you can’t afford. On and on it goes into a long death spiral of high interest rates, late fees, repossessions, and eventually bankruptcy. This is an expected pattern from high time preference negroes but this is something our people must avoid or pull themselves out of. Accumulating all this debt shows a lack of self-control, discipline, and planning. It causes marriages to fall apart, property to be lost, and squandered inheritances. Let’s also keep in mind that a certain (((tribe))) benefits greatly from this cycle. Debt is bondage and our people must shake off these chains.

What Whites should do: Obviously, some debt is unavoidable. Mortgages, new cars, student loans, and even a credit card for emergencies can be helpful and handled wisely. However, our society has a real problem here. Consumerism is our religion and we sacrifice our whole lives to satisfy the gods of debt. Many of us might be working ourselves to death simply to make our monthly debt payments. The first thing we must do is avoid debt if at all possible. Do your best to save for things. Instead of buying a brand new car, save some cash and buy an older used car. If you must have a credit card, limit yourself to only one. Be sure to pay off the entire balance each month. Discipline yourself not to use credit cards to purchase unneeded luxuries or to impress friends. If it is necessary to go into any debt, keep it as low as possible. Be sure you have enough monthly income to make the payments and never miss one. Debt is draining our society and our people. It weakens us and strengthens a certain (((enemy))). It is vital for us to extinguish this behavior of excessive debt that is not a part of who we are. Get out and stay out of debt.

#10 – Smoking Weed: It’s a shame that this has to be discussed. Weed, contrary to what is becoming accepted in our culture, isn’t harmless. Those who habitually engage in the practice become lazy, lethargic, careless, and ditzy. No respectable white man or women should engage in such behavior. Over time, your brain will deteriorate, making what should be your wise years useless. If our people continue to succumb to this cultural trend, we will be unable to fulfill the 14 words. Our people will die and we will become a footnote in history.

What Whites should do: If you’re using weed, stop it. If you’re not, don’t start. Oppose it whenever and wherever you can. Do all you can to keep your children from falling into it. This isn’t about the War on Drugs or the Non-aggression principle, this is about avoiding something that will lull our people to sleep, making them useless to reproduce, build a culture, and oppose our (((enemies))).  Weed isn’t for whites. Let the negroes keep it.

Now get out there and do the white thing!

~ By T.J. Dabney and originally published at Identity Dixie.

Unless you’ve been off planet, you know that various extremist lefties, PC wimps and assorted anti-White bigots have for years been trying to deny the existence of races of humans. They do this to try to have us all blend together into a bland one size fits all Tan Everyman by practicing bedroom genocide.

Of course, this idea that all humans are the same is absurd.  So absurd, in fact, that eventually, when the PC dinosaurs pass from the scene, people will understand that not only are there different races of humans, but that what are currently thought of as the major human races will actually be classified as subspecies.

We humans are part of nature and we are the products of the natural forces of evolution that are seen throughout nature.

Evolution is all about divergence — a constant tinkering and engineering with flesh and making new models to survive in ever changing conditions. This is why there are different races (actually subspecies) of humans and why there are different races, subspecies and species of every type of organism.  It is also why science will never be able to classify all species and why new species are constantly being discovered — nature keeps inventing new ones built on what went before but with some modifications.

Comes now this article HERE on how a particularly venomous species of rattlesnake — the Mojave rattler — is now showing up in New Mexico in the United States.  The point I want to make about this, if this is not already clear, is that it is foolish for humans to think that all humans are one race.  Nature doesn’t work that way.  Our eyes tell us we’re not all the same.

Medical science tells us that we’re not all the same. Statistics of behaviors and abilities tell us that we’re not all the same. So, why would anyone believe that we’re all the same?  It’s nuts.

Anyway, back to our lesson given to us by nature about rattlesnakes — a lesson that we should be able to analogize to humans if we can but rid ourselves of the false belief in a one-size-fits-all, samey-same human type that society has filled us with.

This species of rattlesnake — the Mojave rattler, remember — looks much like many other species of rattlesnakes and the easiest way to distinguish it is that at the end of its tail it has white bands that are thicker than its black bands. Just a minor visible difference.  However, the real difference with the Mojave rattler is internal. It’s venom is much stronger than the venom of many other rattlers and if you’re bitten by one, you need to be treated with a different anti-venom if you hope to survive.

Now, if you want to apply PC principles to rattlesnakes and say they are all the same under the skin, and if you handle the Mojave rattler as you might handle some other rattlesnakes, you’re likely to be pushing up daises.

And, just to drive the point home about the differences among seemingly similar organisms (including humans), HERE’S  a list of the different species of rattlesnakes.   By the way, most of the various species of rattlesnakes (and there are many different species) look more alike than do the human races look like each other.

Learn the lessons of nature.  They’re all around us. Be a naturalist. Darwin understood more about evolution and nature just by studying earth worms in his back yard and pigeons near where he lived than one can usually find in many textbooks today.

Do not miscegenate.  It stops White evolution. Live White. Think White. Breed White. Our highest destiny is to evolve into a new human species incapable of breeding with older human types. To so evolve, we must not have gene flow from those who are not our White kind. Period.

Some of the world’s most eminent geneticists have condemned a new book claiming there is a biological basis for race and for racial differences in behaviour.  So reports The Independent in an article discussing  a recent book entitled, “A Troublesome Inheritance: Genes, Race and Human History“, by author Nicholas Wade.

I don’t intend in this essay to try to answer the debate, but instead to assist readers in reaching their own conclusions.

Basically, it appears that human behaviour is influenced by two major factors: our genes and the culture in which we live.  Our genes are inherited characteristics, embedded in the biochemistry of the human body.  We cannot change our genes.  We are stuck with them for life.  Culture refers to the prevailing attitudes and behavioural norms in the society in which we live, and culture can not only be changed, but changed rapidly.

The Seven Years’ War was fought between the years 1754 and 1763, and resulted in Britain becoming a major world power for roughly the next two hundred years.  The outcome could have been very different, however, had it not been for one incident early on.  In 1756, the French captured Minorca from the British, following which a British admiral called John Byng was convicted of the crime of failing to do his utmost, and was shot by firing squad.  While controversial, his execution left Britain’s army and naval officers in no doubt that they were expected not to shy away from combat.

In 1851, Britain hosted the Great Exhibition in Hyde Park.  It ran for several months, and attracted many visitors, including a large number from abroad.  It was a celebration to technological advance, but primarily of British technological advance.  Even its venue, the Crystal Palace, was in itself a revolutionary architectural innovation.  However it was an event which might never have taken place had it not been for the Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834.

Up until 1834, many people in Britain had been unwilling to work because welfare provision at the time was perceived to be excessively generous.  Its drastic reform in 1834 led to a major cultural shift among the poorer social classes.  Quite simply, a work ethic was born more or less overnight.

If immigrants behave differently from British people, then it might be down to culture, or it might be down to genetics.  So far as I can see, it can only be the one of the other.  There is no third factor at work.  Consider intellect.

Britain, like most European countries, has valued intellect for pretty well as far back as our history is recorded.  Adult literacy was below fifty percent until the nineteenth century, and it is not surprising that literate people often enjoyed higher salaries, and people saw a clear advantage to having their children schooled if possible, and so learning gradually spread through the population.  We can see a similar pattern in many third world countries today, but it is nevertheless the case that intellect was not generally a prized commodity in the hunter-gatherer world of pre-colonial Africa.  If the reader can think of any exceptions to this rule, then they were exactly that –exceptions.

We might therefore conclude that lower intellectual capacity among black people was historically a matter of culture.  The fly in that ointment however is that if true then we would expect black people to catch up with white people intellectually as soon as a culture shift occurs.  The effect might not be immediate, but surely it could be achieved in a matter of a few generations at most.

We find a different situation however.  Many black people in Europe today are second or third generation immigrants, and yet their intellect generally remains low relative to white people.  It is true that immigrant children have tended to outperform British children in schools in recent years, but this can be dismissed as a matter of culture.  Too much pandering to immigrants in the classroom has left many British pupils feeling undervalued.

Take history lessons.  In my day they were about examining evidence and drawing relevant conclusions.  Nowadays it is about being brainwashed about fictitious black achievement.  Making children memorise that Mary Seacole was a black woman who ran a hospital when she was in fact a mixed race woman who ran a canteen for army officers is education close to its worst.

If culture rather than race is what separates whites from blacks, then how come black people do not change their culture significantly when living among whites?  Black people tend to listen to certain types of music, such as soul, reggae, and hip hop.  The only black classical composer I can think of was Samuel Coleridge Taylor, and even he was African only on his father’s side.  Likewise the only black rock star I can think of is Lenny Kravitz, and he is black only on his mother’s side.

Consider this quote from the Telegraph: In his book, Mr Wade attacks the “longstanding orthodoxy” among social scientists that human races are a social construct with little or no basis in biology and genetics, along with the idea that human evolution effectively stopped long ago in the distant past.

I have three questions.  First, I would like to know what evidence there is for race being a matter of social construct.  (I currently believe it to be no more than wishful thinking.)

Second, if we accept – as all scientists do – that genetic differences can account for superficial differences among humans (such as skin colour,) then why should we not also at least consider the likelihood that genetic differences can also account for more fundamental differences (such as intellect or propensity to violence)?

Third, I would like to know what logic evolutionists have for believing that human evolution could ever stop, as supposedly happened in the distant past.

Evolution is widely taught as being the consequence of purely random biochemical changes, with the only method in the madness being that some of these random biochemical changes confer a survival advantage whereas others do not.  There is therefore no logic whatever in believing that evolution could ever stop.  People who tell you that black people are on a separate evolutionary trajectory from white people are merely trying to make sense of evolution.  People who deny that black people and white people are on separate evolutionary trajectories either do not believe in evolution, or else believe in a politically correct version of evolution which is utterly hypocritical.

Has anyone read Nicholas Wade’s book?  Please leave a comment if you have.

This is about White humans. Please bear with me, and I’ll get there pretty quickly.

A genetic study of Humpback Whales shows that subtle color differences and skin markings are visible indications that there is not one uniform species of Humpback whales, but that there are at least three subspecies and that they are on different evolutionary trajectories.

And, just as a reminder, remember that a subspecies is an organism that has diverged from the main trunk of the species and is on its way to full specieshood if certain conditions occur. Among these conditions–some more important than others–are a lack of gene flow caused either by geographic isolation or reproductive isolation, differential selection pressures, and mutations that will naturally arise in the isolated population.

And, the same principles that we see at work in Humpback whales–color differences and other easily seen morphological characteristics–apply to humans even though the ignorant one world blenders among us want to deny it as they try to get Whites to let down our guards and miscegenate ourselves out of existence via bedroom genocide.

The blenders want unawakened and easily manipulated Whites to think all humans are the same so these Whites will mate with non-Whites and produce non-White children instead of White children. The result of this is more non-White children and fewer White children. It is White genocide that the blenders are playing at. It takes two White parents to produce a White child. A White and any non-White cannot produce a truly White child. It is simply not possible, because a truly White child requires 46 “white” chromosomes–23 from his or her father and 23 from his or her mother.

The truth of nature is this: The present so-called human “races”–Whites, Blacks, Browns, Yellows, Reds–as generally recognized today, are really subspecies* of Homo sapiens and these subspecies are then further divided by nature into more subtle races that often correspond with ancient traditional tribes and nations.

In other words, the currently accepted taxonomy of man is flawed. Whites are more than a race. We are a subspecies. And to ensure our survival, our expansion and our continuation on our evolutionary track, we need to breed only with our own White subspecies and we must not breed with the other human subspecies.

At the same time, we must not, under current conditions, put too fine a point on our taxonomy such that we do not breed with other Whites who do correspond to our ancient traditional tribes and nations. To do so could lead to us breeding far too few of the White kind. In other words, we should not try to just breed Irish with Irish, French with French, Germans with Germans, etc. but to see all non-Jewish Whites as part of the White subspecies–the White biomass. Should we ever have a completely White world, we might then reasonably start further defining ourselves.

Nature is the tireless and never sleeping backyard engineer constantly causing the divergence of life as it never stops tinkering with organisms to allow life to not only fill every niche that can supply energy for life processes, but so that the organisms that flow into every niche are comfortable in those niches and have the tools to prosper and compete with other organisms for dominance.** In this regard, one can say that all is change and all is in flux. And, nature doesn’t play favorites but tinkers with all organisms all the time, so the struggle to be and to be more is also never ending and the competition is constant. It’s just a natural part of cosmic evolution.

If we understand this, we can get in the game and not aimlessly drift through life, but we can live consciously and with purpose. And, because of our brains and our consciousness we White ones can start taking a hand in our own evolution along the path that is best for us alone. In fact, I say we White ones are at the point in our evolutionary development where, for our own benefit as the unique people that we are–White people–that we must consciously do this or we risk blending back in with the non-White masses and disappearing.

This is not a call for eugenics, as the term is normally used. I reject eugenics as being counterproductive to our evolution and I reject the notion of an aristocratic type among us that we should try to breed, as this often leads to fewer of us being born, and it keeps some of the so-called, and self-designated aristocrats from breeding at all. So, some of these so-called aristocrats write some books about philosophy and then they die and turn to dust. They are then extinct, as is their DNA code. What was the purpose of their lives? There was none–at least not as cosmic time is measured. It would have been better if they had written fewer books and jumped in bed more. Then, they would still exist in their DNA codes that they passed on. But, of course, it would have been better still if they had written all their books and also jumped in bed more. The two things are not mutually exclusive.

I say that we Whites should breed to our maximum–but only with other Whites and never with non-Whites. I have faith in our unique DNA code that makes us White people and I believe it has defaults that will allow nature to sort it out for us as we consciously evolve along the exclusively White path so long as we provide enough fleshly material for nature to work with–this means we need to teem like maggots on garbage. We need every White to breed to his or her maximum according to what his or her body can produce.

And, further, I believe many of us do have the so-called desirable “racist gene,” which is more than likely a complex of genes and DNA factors that not only gives us a heightened sense of who is us and who is not us–a beneficial survival mechanism–but that this “racist gene” also gives us the ability to transform ourselves (through the natural and fundamental processes of evolution) into a new species incapable of breeding with other types of humans (this is a good thing, this not being able to breed with them) when we have enough of us.

We must understand that organisms that can’t adapt and compete are replaced. We White humans can understand these things that so-called lower organisms can’t understand, and in understanding we must act. Understanding is both a gift and a responsibility. Our primary responsibility is to breed White and to breed often–to let the armies and civilizations that exist as sperm and eggs within our bodies emerge into the world to fix what is broken and to make it a better place.

The ways of existence, including life and evolution, are all around us and right in our back yards. We just have to live consciously, open our eyes, and use our reason to see and understand the truth and the basic underlying forces that shape everything from viruses, to whales to humans. Life is life. Get in the game. Multiply, evolve. Expand always and contract never. It is the way.

Austen Layard
Occidental Observer
February 3, 2014

What happens when a forensic anthropologist is asked to identify the race of skeletal remains in a politically-charged climate where “race is a social construct”?  A classic case of doublethink: simultaneously accepting two contradictory beliefs as correct.  An article titled Forensic Identification of “Race” published in the journal Current Anthropology states:

The identification of the “race” of human remains by forensic anthropologists in New Zealand provides Maori with a service that is both helpful and contentious…Doing so is ethically paradoxical because the estimation of “race” implies that races exist, a concept that has been questioned and rejected by most anthropologists. (Cox et al. 2006)

The Maori are the indigenous people of New Zealand who share a similar history with Native Americans in that they were largely displaced by colonial Europeans and have since earned their valued non-Western victimhood status which is currently being used for political redress in lieu of historical grievances.

When human remains are found in New Zealand, the Maori request forensic analysis to determine whether the bones are their own ancestors or instead of European descent.  This process is guided by a set of codes adopted in the New Zealand government which protect the rights of Maori to have their traditions and beliefs respected.  These codes acknowledge the special significance of Maori human remains because of the Maori view that human remains retain the spirit of the deceased after death.

So anthropologists in New Zealand are in a tough spot: being asked to fulfil the wishes of a protected indigenous population by identifying the race of human remains, while at the same time their own scholarly discipline purports that race is only skin deep.

It has even been suggested that forensic anthropologists who continue to identify individuals by “race,” while meaning no harm in doing so, may be nothing more than “kind racists” simply by helping to legitimize the race concept. (Ibid)

What to do, what to do???…the scientists want to make up for historical grievances by honouring the Maori request to identify their ancestors, but by doing so they’re complicit in blemishing anthropology’s sacred doctrine of race denial.

From this it might be concluded that forensic anthropologists have an ethical obligation to decline to identify the race of physical remains, thereby educating the general public about the myth of the existence of races. (Ibid)

Thus the article moves straight past cognitive dissonance into the loony land of doublethink.  In other words: “Yes, forensic anthropologists can identify the race of human bones, but we would rather educate the masses with our wonderful theory that race is a myth.”  To educate is to provide with information.  This statement advocates the opposite: it promotes the spreading of misinformation. This is apparently lost on the authors, who perceive no conflict in retaining in their minds two contradictory beliefs at the same time: that race is a biological reality, and that race does not exist.

Here’s another example from the same article:

The general public believes that the race concept is a biological fact rather than a cultural construct. To argue against the existence of races is to argue against the perception of the characteristics that allow discrimination among individuals. However scientifically flawed this reasoning, it is inappropriate to enter into the debate with police and family during a forensic investigation. (Ibid; italics not in original)

To clarify, these scholars are saying (presumably with a straight face) that it is scientifically flawed reasoning to accept that race is a biological fact…while simultaneously using biological facts to identify race in human bones.  As if that weren’t bad enough, they are implying that the general public is too uneducated and bigoted to grasp such doublethink, but that enlightened scholars shouldn’t embarrass the poor fools by pointing out their ignorance during a time of family crisis.

The only mental conflict perceived by these scholars is the possibility that they are being insensitive to the Maori. Never mind that they just implied that the general (White) public of New Zealand are a bunch of unenlightened hayseeds.

However, because skeletal remains retain spiritual importance for Maori despite having been separated from them, in some cases, for hundreds of years, forensic anthropologists who refuse to identify “race” could be seen to be placing their own beliefs over those of an indigenous group. (Ibid)

God forbid Whites are ever perceived as putting their own interests above any other group.

The forensic anthropologist clearly has an ethical and moral responsibility to make the attempt, because to do otherwise ignores the wishes of Maori to be recognized as culturally distinct. (Ibid)

So the wishes of minority groups with victimhood status trump all other moral imperatives.  How did we find ourselves in a situation where an article with so many blatant contradictions and condescending drivel is published in one of anthropology’s most prestigious peer-reviewed journals, without a shred of commentary pointing out its obvious flaws?  Hopefully the sane anthropologists are just keeping their heads down, trying to weather the storm of Cultural Marxism until its political, anti-scientific dogma works its way through the system.  The question is whether the discipline of anthropology can survive, or will just simply continue to degrade into meaningless post-modern banter.

Reference:

Cox, K., N. Tayles, and H. Buckley

2006    Forensic Identification of “Race”: The Issues in New Zealand. Current Anthropology 47(5):869-874.