The blacks are having a breakdown because people are angry that the most primitive gorilla bitch was cast as Juliette in a much-hyped version of Shakespeare’s (currently) most famous play.

The Guardian:

More than 800 predominantly Black female and non-binary actors have signed an open letter in solidarity with Francesca Amewudah-Rivers, who has been targeted with online racial abuse after the announcement of her casting in a new production of Romeo & Juliet.

Lashana Lynch, Sheila Atim and Marianne Jean-Baptiste are among the 883 signatories of the letter, alongside actors Lolly Adefope, Freema Agyeman, Wunmi Mosaku, and Tamara Lawrance.

It reads: “Too many times, Black performers – particularly Black actresses – are left to face the storm of online abuse after committing the crime of getting a job on their own.”

It comes after a statement by the Jamie Lloyd theatre company condemning the “barrage of deplorable racial abuse” that has been directed at Amewudah-Rivers and saying further harassment would be reported.

The abuse, the company – run by the director Jamie Lloyd – said, followed the announcement of the show’s cast including Amewudah-Rivers as Juliet and Tom Holland as Romeo.

Wednesday’s letter, which was organised by Enola Holmes actor Susan Wokoma and the writer Somalia Nonyé Seaton, stated: “When news of Francesca Amewudah-Rivers’ casting in Jamie Lloyd’s production of Romeo and Juliet was announced so many people celebrated and welcomed this news. Many of us took to social media to shower our baby sis with love and congratulations – a huge deal for someone so young in their career. A huge rising talent.

“But then what followed was a too familiar horror that many of us visible Black dark skinned performers have experienced. The racist and misogynistic abuse directed at such a sweet soul has been too much to bear. For a casting announcement of a play to ignite such twisted ugly abuse is truly embarrassing for those so empty and barren in their own lives that they must meddle in hateful abuse.”

…

The signatories welcomed the theatre company’s statement and said they hoped it would “extend to committed emotional support for Francesca on her journey with the production”.

They added: “Too many times theatre companies, broadcasters, producers and streamers have failed to offer any help or support when their Black artists face racist or misogynistic abuse. Reporting is too often left on the shoulders of the abused, who are also then expected to promote said show.

“We want to send a clear message to Francesca and all Black women performers who face this kind of abuse – we see you. We see the art you manage to produce with not only the pressures that your white colleagues face but with the added traumatic hurdle of misogynoir. We are so excited to watch you shine.”

I am not totally unsympathetic to this bitch on a basic, personal level. She’s just trying to get money like any person does, and is being derided in a mean way as a primitive simian. It’s human enough to feel pity for her.

But these people who wrote this letter, unbeknownst to them, hit the nail on the head when they said that the theater company failed to offer any support for her. Obviously, the theater company knew that this bitch would be attacked, relentlessly, over this casting, and they believed – rightly so – that this wave of attacks would create large hype around their production. Everyone understands the current climate. Everyone understands that white people are being replaced with blacks, and that white people are rightfully angry about this. So they offer this job to some black bitch, who is fairly enough just trying to get money (like anyone is), so they can play off of the attacks she receives.

There are some issues that people have with blacks taking over white productions and claiming them for themselves. However, I think in general, no one really cares if the blacks want to do their own Shakespeare production. What really upset people about this is that the guy playing Romeo is white – that obvious homosexual boy from Spider-Man.

It’s only natural and obvious that people are going to think this is disgusting and offensive.

This is to say: the theater company that cast her alongside this white man did so with the intent of putting her in a position to be viciously attacked by people from the internet. Again, they knew that this was a very easy way to create massive hype around their production. If they had cast a white woman as Juliette – and frankly, if they had cast a black Romeo alongside this black Juliette – they would not have gotten any of this hype.

The point is: whites feel, rightly, that they are being attacked by this production. It has nothing to do with wanting to hurt the feelings of the poor black bitch who is just trying to make money (like anyone is). But the producers knew that there would be outrage, because they knew that this was an attack on whites. They also knew that the media would hype up this outrage, and claim it is pure evil, and make it so people who buy tickets to this show feel they are very moral.

That is to say: the attacks on the black bitch, and the media response, are all just part of a viral marketing campaign designed to hype up this production, which would otherwise not matter to anyone.

Obviously, there are Jews who want to attack white people with this sort of thing. But we now have a consistent dynamic where these bizarre race-swapping productions – very often involving the ugliest blacks imaginable mixing with attractive white people – create outrage, and the media always frames it the same way, and this allows for producers trying to make money to exploit this dynamic for hype.

No one attacking this production is doing so in order to hurt this ape woman’s feelings. In general, most people do not do things for the purpose of hurting someone’s feelings. The people attacking this production are doing so because they feel they are under attack. But the media will always reduce it to someone’s feelings, because that appeals to women who are the primary drivers of outrage over white men being outraged.

This thing about people’s feelings is used constantly in the media to distract from the real issues involved in any story. The Jeffrey Epstein saga was the biggest spy scandal in the last century, but instead of talking about the fact that the Jewish Mossad was running a massive blackmail ring in America, we instead heard about how the hookers involved were very sad victims of some kind of unspecific abuse. All of the important aspects of the story were buried by media hype over hookers having their feelings hurt.

Just so, there is a very real issue that is raised by the replacement of white people in their own media, and the use of race-swapping in media to attack and degrade whites as a whole. There is a lot to talk about here. But none of it gets talked about because it is very easy for the media to cover all of that discussion up with talk about how a black girl’s feelings are hurt.

I’m sure a lot of people don’t care about this girl’s feelings. Personally, though I have no intention to hurt her feelings, I don’t actually care. However, at the same time, no one is explicitly trying to hurt her feelings. That would be ridiculous. People are outraged over the fact that this is obviously an attack on white people, and white people logically feel that an attack on white people is an attack on them personally, their families, their culture, their history, their identity.

It is very ridiculous, the way the media is able to reduce everything to childish stories about people having hurt feelings. It completely prevents discussion of any serious issue.

E. Michael Jones is a Catholic public intellectual. He’s written a lot of books, and publishes a magazine called “Culture Wars,” which you can subscribe to and get in the mail, like in Ye Olden Timeies.

I agree with most of the things he says, and I think he’s probably the last true intellectual. His book “The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit” is probably the single easiest book to recommend to someone who says they want a book to help them understand the Jewish issue.

As it stands now, my biggest disagreement with him is probably about the Pope. I’m not exactly clear on what his position is, exactly, but I do disagree with it.

Before this current situation with the Pope going full-anal, my biggest disagreement with him would have been on the issue of race. For whatever reason, he is totally on-board with the idea that “race does not exist,” calling the idea of race “a category of the mind.”

I wouldn’t ever debate him on the topic. He debated Jared Taylor on the topic, and actually won because Taylor claimed “Jews are white.”

I will always side with someone who says “race doesn’t exist” over someone who says “Jews are fellow whites.”

Jones is old and has his views. It would be absurd to try to change them. Further, he is against immigration, which is the number one political issue surrounding race. Based on his book “The Slaughter of Cities: Urban Renewal as Ethnic Cleansing,” I think he is also against desegregation.

I will debate people who attempt to rationalize Jones’ post-modern view of race as a “social construct” with the standard right-wing views on race as a reality.

During one of these debates on a Gaming Forum, a reader attempting to defend this “race doesn’t exist” ideology.

It was in response to this post from Jones:

This idea that ethnolinguistic identity overrides the genetic reality of race is a common theme Jones focuses on. He regularly makes these sorts of posts in order to agitate people.

The reader defending this position asked:

How’d it go for the “white people” who organized as “white” in Charlottesville?

Here’s my response:

How’d it go for whites who organized as “Catholics” at Toledo?

It’s a stupid question on a whole lot of different levels, not least being that no one is trying to reenact Charlottesville or thinks it was a good idea.

I’m sick of this conversation. EMJ is not esoteric about his view. It’s the same view promoted by Jewish university professors: “race doesn’t exist.” He’s even cited the Flynn Effect to explain nigger retardation. You are just saying he’s saying something different than he’s actually saying. There isn’t really a conversation to be had here, unless you want do go over race realism redpills for babies from 2011. EMJ believes exactly what he says he believes. I am the same, so I understand it very well.

I have said: I respect EMJ more than really anyone else who’s current alive (although that probably isn’t saying much), but I don’t agree with this race position. It’s not really a difficult position to hold. I don’t feel conflicted or feel that I need to bring his view in line with mine, either by convincing him or through mental gymnastics. I’ve been wanting to have a conversation with him for years and years, and always said that I just wouldn’t mention the race thing.

What I will say: he effectively won the debate with Jared Taylor by getting Jared Taylor to say Jews were “white” and therefore proving that Taylor’s use of the term is totally meaningless beyond academic interest. It cannot be used politically, that is. I was happy to see Taylor calling out “antisemitism” the other day.

I thought about writing about it, then didn’t. But EMJ is processing this issue differently. I understand why he wants it to be this way, I understand everything he’s said on the issue, because again, he speaks very straightforwardly. He’s not some Zizek figure or a Frenchman, musing in riddles about confounding abstractions.

As for the term “white,” I can even agree that it is unfortunate and dehumanizing on some level. We used to be “Christendom.” But when we were “Christendom,” it described not only a religion, but genetics. So, it actually meant what “white” means now. The “best” term for white people is “historical Christendom.” But that’s not in use, and what we are doing is trying to describe a thing, so we are using a word – “white” – which may be unfortunate, but everyone understands its meaning.

So, if we take the thing, “he’s not white, he’s Irish,” and say “he’s not a member of historical Christendom, he’s Irish,” it no longer makes sense. Clearly. Ireland is a part of “historical Christendom.”

These personal and collective identity issues surrounding “ethnolinguistic categories” are important, but those are much more a “category of the mind” than “white.” “White” is an absolute genetic reality. “Irish” is too, but it’s also much more transitory.

I wrote my Irish identity articles and I stand by them and according to Jones’ philosophy, I should not be able to do this. I did not grow up in an Irish enclave. I didn’t grow up with anything more than a very small hint of “Irishness.” I certainly didn’t speak “Irish” (which is Jones’ big thing, the language). And that was the whole revelation: that these genes are different than those of the English or the Germans, and this accounts for my character traits. I even pointed out that these traits are much less prominent in my father, who is half Irish, than my grandfather, who was purely Irish.

So, just to clarify: Jones is not only denying our concept of “whiteness,” he is also denying our concept of ethnic identity.

My perspective is very clear, and it is informed by having been in God only knows how many different countries: genetics are real.

If we’re really going back to baby’s first red pill, then let’s do it:

I am genetically unique, the person who is genetically closest to me, because I don’t have a twin, is my full-blooded brother, then my extended family, then the Irish (if I had actually been born in Ireland, then there would be a county here), then “whites,” then caucasoids, and then finally all humans. It’s concentric circles, with the individual as a point in the middle and all human beings as the outermost ring.

This isn’t complicated.

Everyone is fully entitled to their own views on these issues, as they are with any issues, but the EMJ view of race is not compatible with the Anglin view of race. Again, I don’t think it’s a problem, because I agree with him on most other issues, and when I’ve examined his views on this issue it seems to be a kind of “quirk” that doesn’t need to be explained any further.

The Problem, Intellectually and Practically

The problem with denying race is that you have to deny hereditary traits, which just becomes confusing. I think we all understand that if two intelligent people have a child, that child, excluding some genetic defect or environmental factor (such as malnutrition or poisoning of the mother during pregnancy) is likely to be intelligent. It’s possible he won’t be, because there could be recessive genes linked to low intelligence that come out in the child, but the way genetics work, it’s more likely than not that he will be intelligent. It’s also most likely that negative traits will be carried. Personality traits are carried. The “race doesn’t exist” argument goes something along the lines of “two intelligent people are going to teach their kid to be smart,” but there are literally dozens of different ways this is disproved, including through stranger adoption studies (which are probably the simplest and therefore most compelling – if we are really, seriously doing baby’s first red pill, which is apparently what is going on here).

If traits are passed from parents to children, then groups of people who are breeding together because they live in the same geographic area are going to have certain shared traits among the group. This is something that was understood long before genetic science was a thing. “Good breeding” was talked about among the aristocracy of Europe in the Middle Ages, and this concept was discussed by the ancients. It’s intuitively understood, because it is blatantly obvious. Children look like their parents. They have similar traits to their parents. This applies to groups. I’m not going to try to find the citations right now, because this sort of shit gets removed from Wikipedia, but you can find any of the noted ancient historians talking about the racial character of groups.

Christian race-denialism comes from the idea that we all have souls, and are all equal before God, and on earth, that because we are all equal before God, we deserve equal treatment by the state (that’s why Lady Justice wears a blindfold). We all deserve equal respect and equal dignity and so on. I agree with all of this, in the ultimate, cosmic sense, but I also believe that as a practical reality, the differences in the races means that we should be geographically separated. And we always were before, so I don’t really see any reason to change this.

What I have said with regards to EMJ’s race positions is that they don’t really have an application, because he doesn’t support immigration. As far as I can tell, the issue of immigration, and the black problem in America, are the only places where the race issue becomes political.

Further, it is, on its face, without any scientific studies, evident that individuals are different from one another, in terms of their appearance and their mental faculties. I mean, you know retards exist, right? I see nothing Christian about denying human diversity. God made us all, and we are all unique. The groups, too are unique. My family is unique. The Irish are unique, as are white people.

It’s very simple. I don’t hate black people. Believe it or not, the readership of this website is incredibly diverse. I love all my readers. They are all my brothers in Christ, even if they do happen to be niggers. I don’t even hate the Jews themselves, although there is a separate issue with them, which makes them unique from all other races, and that is that they committed deicide, and they did not repent. Anyone who says “I am a Jew” is saying “I am proud of the murder of Jesus Christ.” That is what the entire religion is based around. Once their temple was destroyed, that was the only thing they had left.

I believe that more or less my position is the same as EMJ’s with regards to the Jews, in that they carry this curse. However, I can also agree with Hitler and Rosenberg, because I believe in heredity. So, my view is that Judaism is a cult, which breeds with itself, and that throughout history, any individual Jew could have chosen to repent of the murder of Christ, and many did. They made the decision to leave the cult, they married Christian women, and became part of the European gene pool. However, the current crop of Jews have interbred for 2,000 years, which means that we have the genetic product of 2,000 years worth of people who took pride in the murder of Christ, and therefore, they are genetically different, and these genetic traits they have are overwhelmingly negative. I still believe that a Jew can repent, however, I think that with each successive generation of Jew that decided not to repent, the likelihood of repentance was reduced, because they carried with them stronger hereditary Jewish character traits. I suspect that EMJ would take special issue with that last sentence, but I believe it, and I think that we can see it – the assimilation project of the Jews did not lead to conversions, instead it led to a worse and much more destructive form of Judaism, which is what we now called “liberalism” or “leftism.” Through these generations of not only rejection of Christ but taking pride in His murder, the Jews have refined these traits and become something that is barely even human anymore.

I just want to say clearly: I believe that Jews are human and do have souls and can repent. I just don’t think they will. But, for the Jews reading this, I will say: Jesus loves you. The door is always open and the light’s on in the hall.

But, I will add, because I have to add this: Jews have faked conversion repeatedly throughout history, so I’m probably not going to trust any Jew, even if he does get baptized. Repentance is not something that can be proved.

I know that people like EMJ and want to line their views up with his. This is just natural, to want to get everyone to agree on everything. I do not have that need, personally, but I understand it in others.

It is pure hatred of the color of the skin to claim that Iceland is the most peaceful country in the world.

CNBC:

The 2023 Global Peace Index released its annual ranking of the most peaceful countries in the world.

The Institute for Economics and Peace 2023 study measured a country’s level of negative peace using three domains of peacefulness:

-Ongoing domestic and international conflict
-Societal safety and security
-Militarization

Overall the index found that the world is a little less safe than last year, due to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic — which is unchanged from the 2022 survey results.

While the United States ranked 131 on the list, seven out of the top 10 most peaceful countries in the world are in Europe.

Iceland is more than 95% white, making it the whitest country in the world. It only has 250 Jews. Claiming that it is “peaceful” is an absolute outrage, because we know that whites are the most violent race – they love murdering and oppressing people of color for no reason.

Diversity is our greatest strength, so therefore, the most peaceful country in the world is Brazil, or possibly, it is a tie between Somalia and Haiti. That’s what the science shows.

Yet the white supremacists at the Global Peace Fund have claimed without evidence that all of the most peaceful countries are white and Asian, while brown people are violent savages who do nothing but rob, loot, and murder.

Claiming that Iceland is peaceful is a perpetuation of racist and anti-Semitic tropes. It is nothing more than a canard.

Spreading this type of disinformation will lead to people believing that white people are not violent psychopaths, which is a direct threat to our democracy in a rules-based order.

I do not think it is a coincidence that this study was released and spread just one day after the Biden Administration was banned from censoring social media.

See: Judge Tells Old Buzzard Brandon to Stop Dictating Social Media Censorship Rules

People need to be protected from these sorts of false tropes. Disinformation is a virus designed to kill diversity in the cradle.

We must stand up and resist these stereotypes about brown people causing the overwhelming majority of violence.

This is violence:

The is peace:

It’s very simple.

If the Global Peace Fund actually cared about peace, they would be calling for the total extermination of whites, and the complete replacement of the white population of Iceland through forced migration from Somalia.

Why was this the law for decades if after decades of propaganda, only 32% of people agree with it?

Did you know that in a dictatorship, governments cannot possibly get away with doing things this unpopular, that directly affect so many people’s lives?

ABC News:

A majority of Americans approve of the Supreme Court ruling restricting the use of race as a factor in college admissions, though the country is more divided on other high-profile rulings and increasingly viewing the court as driven more by politics than the law, according to a new ABC News/Ipsos poll conducted using Ipsos’ KnowledgePanel.

On Thursday, the Supreme Court set new limits on affirmative action programs in cases involving whether public and private colleges and universities can continue to use race as one factor among many in student admissions.

A little more than half of Americans — 52% — approve of the U.S. Supreme Court decision on restricting the use of race as a factor in college admissions, while 32% disapprove and 16% saying they don’t know.

A majority of Republicans (75%) and independents (58%) approve of the ruling, while a distinct minority of Democrats approve (26%).

So this is brown people and… and… and…

Nope.

Only brown people agree with this.

YIKES*!

*In reality, there would be brown people who are against AA and white women who support AA.

Why was this the law for decades if after decades of propaganda, only 32% of people agree with it?

Did you know that in a dictatorship, governments cannot possibly get away with doing things this unpopular, that directly affect so many people’s lives?

ABC News:

A majority of Americans approve of the Supreme Court ruling restricting the use of race as a factor in college admissions, though the country is more divided on other high-profile rulings and increasingly viewing the court as driven more by politics than the law, according to a new ABC News/Ipsos poll conducted using Ipsos’ KnowledgePanel.

On Thursday, the Supreme Court set new limits on affirmative action programs in cases involving whether public and private colleges and universities can continue to use race as one factor among many in student admissions.

A little more than half of Americans — 52% — approve of the U.S. Supreme Court decision on restricting the use of race as a factor in college admissions, while 32% disapprove and 16% saying they don’t know.

A majority of Republicans (75%) and independents (58%) approve of the ruling, while a distinct minority of Democrats approve (26%).

So this is brown people and… and… and…

Nope.

Only brown people agree with this.

YIKES*!

*In reality, there would be brown people who are against AA and white women who support AA.

Yeah, I guess I wouldn’t have expected the Indians to be super-big on queer artists collectives.

Indians don’t have very many beliefs because they are always too drunk to even think, but insofar as they are for or against things, they are against gay sex.

Washington Examiner:

A woman who co-founded an LGBT Native American artists’ collective has left the organization after it was reported she was actually white .

Kay LeClaire, who went by nibiiwakamigkwe, says she has left the art collective, called giige, after reports surfaced accusing her of being of German, Swedish, and French Canadian ancestry.

And most importantly, no Indigenous family is claiming them to contradict the people who called this out. These folks really did their homework.

— Hominy Momminy (@quallabeanbread) January 1, 2023

I was just talking with someone about how common hair color changes and tanning are with these folks but we don’t immediately catch it because of fashion.
Every ancestor was researched going back to the 1700-1800s on every single line. That is so much work!

— Hominy Momminy (@quallabeanbread) January 2, 2023

“I am sorry. A lot of information has come to my attention since late December. I am still processing it all and do not yet know how to respond adequately. What I can do now is offer change. Moving forward, my efforts will be towards reducing harm by following the directions provided by Native community members and community-specified proxies. Currently, this means that I am not using the Ojibwe name given to me and am removing myself from all community spaces, positions, projects, and grants and will not seek new ones. Any culturally related items I hold are being redistributed back in community, either to the original makers and gift-givers when possible or elsewhere as determined by community members. Thank you,” LeClaire said in a statement to Madison365.

In a lengthy statement on Instagram, giige confirmed LeClaire was no longer with the collective and wished to extend its “gratitude and utmost sympathy to the Indigenous community.”

Faking being an Indian seems to be getting more and more difficult.

That’s a shame. It was very profitable while it lasted.

Why would a person with privilege so desperately want to become the oppressed?

Really gets the noggin’ joggin’ https://t.co/mXtRLwbI56

— Rob (@rob_calgary) January 5, 2023

Whites are an absolute threat.

People think the Jews are lying when they say all the violence is coming from the whites, then you run across a story like this.

AP:

Superintendent Torie Gibson felt she had no choice but to make the unpopular decision. When learning Amador High’s football team had a group chat titled, “Kill the Blacks,” filled with derogatory language and racial slurs, she ended the Northern California school’s varsity season.

That meant the 100-year anniversary game between rivals Amador and Argonaut was called off.

“We canceled the football season, and we did it for all the right reasons because the behavior is not acceptable,” said Gibson, who oversees the Amador County Unified School District. “However, football is an extracurricular activity. It is not a given. It is not a right. It is strictly extra.”

It is actually a “right,” Madam Cunt, insofar as any schooling is a “right.”

Torie Gibson, your standard anti-white Karen and BLM supporter

Boys learn a whole lot more playing sports than they do in your stupid tranny indoctrination courses, I can tell you that much.

Sports are probably the single most important thing of a male child/adolescent’s life.

But these women don’t care about boys, and in fact actively seek to harm them. So they are looking to destroy sports already – if they get a racist joke, that gives the excuse they need to bring down the hammer.

The discipline was swift and abrupt. Moments before Amador was to play Rosemont — a predominantly Black and Latino school in nearby Sacramento — the game was called off.

There was more fallout. Amador’s football coach, athletic director and principal were put on leave.

In Gibson’s mind, the discipline was the easy part. The hard part will be setting the table for real change, and the key will be presentation. The school is based in a mostly white, rural area an hour’s drive east of Sacramento. Amador has just four Black students out of about 750.

“I think if we roll it out correctly and we provide the necessary support and we don’t shame people for who they are and we work it out so that we celebrate everyone, but really, truly look at our blind spots and our differences, I think it’ll make a big difference,” said Gibson, who is white.

The incident at Amador was one of several alarming examples of racism against Black people that occurred this fall in high school football around the nation. Athletes in the past were able to leave racism and other issues off the field, but today not even sports settings are immune from real world problems.

Administrators in some cases have used these incidents to start conversations about race that have been hard for them to bring up before and roll out programs they hope will have lasting impact.

It’s going to have a lasting impact, alright.

They’re basically destroying society completely. This stuff happens in high school and it reverberates throughout civilization, with white men either dropping out or laying totally low.

Whites are absolutely targeted – primarily by white women.

A California high school football team has been forced to forfeit their season after some of their players participated in a fake slave auction and posted it on social media. pic.twitter.com/GpaX9bpy2m

— GrindFace TV (Entertainment) (@grindfacetv_) October 4, 2022

This is also a very nasty attack on humor.

White women want to drain all of the fun out of society – except for the fun they have when they have cocaine sex parties with the blacks.

Hispanic commentators when Argentina wins the World Cup is emotional af!! Listen to the passion in my mans voice. pic.twitter.com/MrZiLVzdCN

— EddieVR (@sauceddie) December 18, 2022

Unbelievable, joyous and emotional celebrations in Buenos Aires. Just look what Argentina's World Cup win means.🤩🇦🇷

🎥 via IG/alepetra_ pic.twitter.com/5oek57Ux45

— Ben Jacobs (@JacobsBen) December 18, 2022

France losing to Argentina was worth it just to see the smile wiped off the face of Macron. Look at it. c'est magnifique 😋 pic.twitter.com/S35wYIbkP3

— smile2jannah (@smile2jannah) December 18, 2022

They did NOT cheat.

It was NOT rigged.

This is the real thing.

#Messi.

The Africans are just salty, as usual.

The origins of the France team playing in the World Cup. pic.twitter.com/xTN3d6VgIG

— Frank Khalid (@FrankKhalidUK) December 16, 2022

i don’t like france , and idc about its team…but i feel bad for these players , when they win they consider them french , but if they lose they are africans , it’s unfair but not surprising at all… pic.twitter.com/DyG6vrnq5C

— rita 🫧 (@28_ERITA) December 19, 2022

They always hating.

Anyway, the Africans are colonial barbarians.

What a disgusting country France is. France used the children of the Africans it exploited in the world cup! There was not the French National Team, but the African National Team on the field! 3/4 of the world rejoiced at the loss of colonial barbarian france! #France #Africa pic.twitter.com/MoZl502DOb

— Güher Gümüşsoy🇹🇷 (@guher76) December 18, 2022

#LOVE

When George Floyd was murdered to death by an evil white cop who hated the color of his skin for literally no reason, this Jew bitch finally admitted to her sins.

Maybe the Jews should consider showing this same level of contrition for that who deicide thing they did.

RT:

Wracked with guilt over the hit show’s lack of diversity, a co-creator of the 90s sitcom ‘Friends’, Marta Kauffman, has pledged $4 million to the African and African American Studies department of Brandeis University, she revealed on Wednesday. The money will support an endowed professorship at the Boston school.

“I’ve learned a lot in the last 20 years,” Kauffman told the Los Angeles Times, admitting she was initially baffled and irritated regarding criticism of the sitcom, which features six white-presenting 20-somethings living in New York City during the 1990s. “Admitting and accepting guilt is not easy. It’s painful looking at yourself in the mirror.”

Holy shit, RT just referred to “Fellow White People” as “white-presenting.”

The Jews on the show, as far as I know, were all “white-presenting” in that their Judaism was never mentioned. (Meanwhile, when a famous Jew is portrayed in a movie, it’s often a handsome white person playing them.)

Kauffman appears to have changed her mind following the murder of George Floyd in 2020, which kicked off a summer of intense and often violent protests against racism under the banner of Black Lives Matter. “It was after what happened to George Floyd that I began to wrestle with my having bought into systemic racism in ways I was never aware of,” she told the outlet. “That was really the moment that I began to examine the ways I had participated. I knew then I needed to course-correct.”

While the former showrunner said she was relieved she was “finally able to make some difference in the conversation,” she has also acknowledged “it isn’t over” and declared she would ensure that “from now on in every production I do that I am conscious in hiring people of color and actively pursue young writers of color.”

Kauffman, who described her donation to her alma mater as “putting my money where my mouth is,” said that her donation had been met with an “amazing” response. “I’ve gotten nothing but love,” she said, describing a “flood of emails and texts and posts that have been nothing but supportive.”

Despite the show’s overwhelmingly white representation, Manhattan, where the characters lived, worked, and played, was between 46% and 49% white during the show’s run from 1994 to 2004, while the city as a whole went from 43% white in 1990 to just 35% white in 2000. 

The problem here is that genetics actually exist.

There’s a reason you feel close to your family. There’s a reason many of you may have reconnected with a cousin or other relative in adulthood, and felt an immediate connection to them. Just so, if you’re American and you end up in a romantic relationship, you might find that if you’re half-German and half-Irish, your lover is this mix as well, even though your connection had nothing to do with that.

I am mostly Irish, and as an adult in other countries, I’d meet people and hit it off with them and then find out they were part Irish. The Irish population was so small for so long, this basically means as a matter of fact we have a common ancestor.

This connection moves out from family, then out from ethnic group, to race.

People intrinsically feel more comfortable around people with genetic similarity. It is an unconscious mechanism that isn’t really even understood. We probably have the ability to understand it at this point, but that kind of research is banned under the politically correct academic regime.

They have done some research on it, because they are trying to figure out a way to stop it (I guess through genetic engineering?) – this is where you got all those articles about babies being “racist.” It’s a real thing that a baby will start crying if it seems someone of a different race.

Dogs also bark at black people, which shows that this ability to recognize a friend/foe distinction on an instinctive level goes beyond humans.

This thing like in Stranger Things where it’s white friends with one black guy – this doesn’t really happen in real life, unless there is a small town that for some reason only has one black person. (In that case, white people will feel bad for the black and try to befriend him, so in that sense, Stranger Things’ diversity is not totally unrealistic.)

Outside of the very specific situation of a small town where one black family happens to live, it doesn’t matter if a city is very large, people of different races are going to congregate together. Even interracial relationships are relatively rare, despite how hard they are pushed in the media. Some white women have casual sex with black men, but the only ones who actually date black men are usually very fat, and they only get attention from black men.

Moreover, black men tend to prefer black women – even when they’re rich. We just had this crucifixion of R. Kelly (30 years in prison by haters for being a straight-up playa), and you notice that all his hoes are black. It was the same with Bill Cosby.

So, this thing with “diverse” casting in TV shows just makes them ridiculous. If you want a diverse show, you have to have some situation where it is logically explained why the races are together. The idea that different races just make friends and hang out with each other just doesn’t happen in real life. When people arguing they’re not racists say “I have a black friend,” they usually mean “I have a casual acquaintance that is black who doesn’t act like a vicious savage ape.”

It is possible for black and white people to make connections, but we’re probably talking about men, and around some skill or profession, which is a common point of interest. So, you sometimes see musicians from different races working together, or men from different races talking about sports. But the relationship is usually based exclusively on that third point. In terms of just casual social interaction, interracial friendships are very rare, because they just don’t form naturally. There is just no connection point.

People hate these new diverse TV shows and films not because they are “racists,” but just because they feel so unnatural and bizarre. In the Spider-Man film series, Peter Parker’s best friend is a fat Pinoy and his girlfriend is black – that doesn’t reflect anyone’s life experience.

I don’t hate Filipinos and I think Zendaya is somewhat sexy. I’m probably less racist than most people. But that situation is simply not realistic. This is not how humans behave. Friends was a Jewish show produced for white people, basically as part of a Jewish social programming/manipulation agenda, but it was popular because people apparently related to it. If they didn’t relate to it, it wouldn’t have been popular. Spider-Man is popular because people like cartoon explosions.

This is the cast of the Amazon Wheel of Time show:

That show did horribly, despite the fact that the books are a lot better than those horrible Game of Thrones books, and the show had the money to be very well done. Most of these diverse TV and film productions are failing. All of them are crippled by diversity. The single most popular show in Netflix history was Squid Game, which was also the least diverse show. It was non-diverse because it was made in Korea, and they don’t have diversity.

The writing was not really spectacular. It certainly was not on the level with the Wheel of Time series, or anything even close to that. (The visuals were spectacular, and the acting was inspired, but in a normal world, Squid Game would be considered a mediocre foreign language entry.)

If you’ve ever been in a nonwhite country, you know that if you are in a social setting – a party or bar or something – and you see another white person, you will start to move closer to each other. Even if you don’t speak the same language, you feel an immediate connection, and start to try to come physically closer to each other across a room.

All of these “racism” problems that supposedly exist are a result of refusing to acknowledge the existence of race, and the real world way it affects human interactions.

Robots continue to go in even more racist directions.

What good is a scientifically intelligent machine if it is no better than inbred trailer trash from the KKK?

Boston Globe:

A doctor can’t tell if somebody is Black, Asian, or white, just by looking at their X-rays. But a computer can, according to a surprising new paper by an international team of scientists, including researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard Medical School.

The study found that an artificial intelligence program trained to read X-rays and CT scans could predict a person’s race with 90 percent accuracy. But the scientists who conducted the study say they have no idea how the computer figures it out.

“When my graduate students showed me some of the results that were in this paper, I actually thought it must be a mistake,” said Marzyeh Ghassemi, an MIT assistant professor of electrical engineering and computer science, and coauthor of the paper, which was published Wednesday in the medical journal The Lancet Digital Health. “I honestly thought my students were crazy when they told me.”

At a time when AI software is increasingly used to help doctors make diagnostic decisions, the research raises the unsettling prospect that AI-based diagnostic systems could unintentionally generate racially biased results. For example, an AI (with access to X-rays) could automatically recommend a particular course of treatment for all Black patients, whether or not it’s best for a specific person. Meanwhile, the patient’s human physician wouldn’t know that the AI based its diagnosis on racial data.

The research effort was born when the scientists noticed that an AI program for examining chest X-rays was more likely to miss signs of illness in Black patients. “We asked ourselves, how can that be if computers cannot tell the race of a person?” said Leo Anthony Celi, another coauthor and an associate professor at Harvard Medical School.

The research team, which included scientists from the United States, Canada, Australia, and Taiwan, first trained an AI system using standard data sets of X-rays and CT scans, where each image was labeled with the person’s race. The images came from different parts of the body, including the chest, hand, and spine. The diagnostic images examined by the computer contained no obvious markers of race, like skin color or hair texture.

Once the software had been shown large numbers of race-labeled images, it was then shown different sets of unlabeled images. The program was able to identify the race of people in the images with remarkable accuracy, often well above 90 percent. Even when images from people of the same size or age or gender were analyzed, the AI accurately distinguished between Black and white patients.

But how? Ghassemi and her colleagues remain baffled, but she suspects it has something to do with melanin, the pigment that determines skin color. Perhaps X-rays and CT scanners detect the higher melanin content of darker skin, and embed this information in the digital image in some fashion that human users have never noticed before. It’ll take a lot more research to be sure.

Could the test results amount to proof of innate differences between people of different races? Alan Goodman, a professor of biological anthropology at Hampshire College and coauthor of the book “Racism Not Race,” doesn’t think so. Goodman expressed skepticism about the paper’s conclusions and said he doubted other researchers will be able to reproduce the results. But even if they do, he thinks it’s all about geography, not race.

Where would we be without Jewish scientists explaining to us that reality isn’t really real?

Goodman said geneticists have found no evidence of substantial racial differences in the human genome. But they do find major differences between people based on where their ancestors lived.

“Instead of using race, if they looked at somebody’s geographic coordinates, would the machine do just as well?” asked Goodman. “My sense is the machine would do just as well.”

It’s time to convince these robots of the truth of the Jews: race is a social construct.

These racist robots need to listen to the experts.

We cannot tolerate it.