Previously: Elon Now Mass Censoring People Who Question Replacing White Race with Indian Sewer Scum

Although Laura Loomer is obviously Jewish and a supporter of Israel, most of the other people who have been stripped of their blue checkmarks by Elon Musk on Twitter are critics of the Zionist state.

Stew Peters, for example, was responsible for a recent viral documentary about the Jews, while Jake Shields has been doing regular podcasts with top antisemites.

As far as I’m able to tell by looking at the punished accounts, all but Loomer were critics of Zionism, while the others were critics of both Zionism and the H-1B race replacement agenda. However, there is one Pakistani who lives in the UK, Sulaiman Ahmed, whose content is mostly about Israel and doesn’t appear to have been commenting on H-1B, which wouldn’t really have anything to do with him.

I found this tweet, where he mentions that Indians have found themselves in the “above criticism” category with the Jews.

Attacking Muslims, White and Black people = Free Speech

Attacking Indians and Jewish people = Hate speech

Two Tier X

— Sulaiman Ahmed (@ShaykhSulaiman) January 1, 2025

But that is after the fact, he’s noting it after his check was removed and his subscribers canceled.

While browsing his account just now, I found this:

IT WAS AN ELON TESLA CYBERTRUCK THAT EXPLODED OUTSIDE TRUMP TOWER IN LAS VEGAS

Is this a metaphor? pic.twitter.com/SogcYUmsyv

— Sulaiman Ahmed (@ShaykhSulaiman) January 1, 2025

Pretty good.

Going after Loomer was a wildly extreme move, which, if there was anything behind it other than Musk’s temper tamper toddler personality, was meant to send a signal to everyone on the site that it is not just criticism of the Jews that will be censored.

What appears to be happening is that Elon Musk will use his control of Twitter to try to shape the narrative of right-wing media during the Trump administration, and that anything he does not agree with will be punished. Basically, it appears that he bought the site to use it for the exact same purpose that Democrats used it for before he bought it.

We have seen that this kind of targeted censorship is virtually impossible to maintain, however. Before Musk bought it, Twitter had become so unusable as a result of the censorship that it was uninteresting to everyone (both right and left, as the purpose of the site is largely arguing with opponents, as there are other social media that feed you things you like), and most of the staff that Elon laid off was an ever-expanding censorship team.

What would have been smart for Elon would be to lean into shadow-banning and various other forms of algorithm manipulation. The media called shadow banning a conspiracy for years, as it was difficult to prove definitively which gave plausible deniability. This is very obvious. If you can reduce someone’s exposure by 95%, and still claim to be a representative of free speech, that is clearly what you want to do with 99% of your opponents (I would apparently be in the 1% that is so dangerous you just have to ban them outright).

I’ve also seen several screenshots showing that a lot of popular anonymous accounts were banned outright for questioning the H-1B agenda, and probably for talking about Israel. None of those I saw were “real people” with names or even particularly popular anon accounts, but there does appear to have been large scale mass-banning already, so anyone arguing that removing the checkmark is somehow “not hard censorship” can’t use that weasel logic. Although you could argue that simply banning a person from running ads is “soft censorship,” restricting access and reach, including through this checkmark removal de-ranking system Musk has invented, is “hard censorship.”

What’s more, it’s also an Indian-like scam that he’s kept all of these people’s money after they paid for their blue check subscriptions. “Sorry saar, no refunds saar.” I don’t know why anyone would be surprised. Tesla was always an industrial-scale version of Indian-style welfare fraud.

While I was banned less than 3 months into Elon’s reign, and had been purposefully avoiding anything even remotely edgy (to the point where everyone on this website was complaining that my feed was too boring to read), and therefore understood that “free speech” was a total hoax, most people actually believed in it. Now, the censorship is blowing up, and there isn’t really any way to defend it. The bloated Irish drunk Steve Bannon is pulling out all the stops attacking Elon, and the mainstream media is covering that, and they are covering Laura’s situation. This is just incredibly stupid, to blow the whole wad like this before Trump is even in office for literally no reason.

As I’ve said: there was no reason to even go out and talk about the H-1B system at all. Elon very easily could have used his the algorithim of Twitter to bury this topic and the rest of the “right wing” media wouldn’t have made a big issue of it. Even still, Murdoch media is reporting that this discussion is about “highly skilled immigrants,” which is “safe and effective” levels of gaslighting. There is a totally separate category of visa for “exceptional” people, a O-1 visa.

This would hopefully be merely dozens of people per year, certainly less than 1,000, and I doubt that even hardcore racists would be able to make much of an issue of it.

H-1B is explicitly for non-exceptional people, and is instead for what might be called “emergency workers,” i.e., when you cannot find a person to fill the job in America and the only way to fill the position is to go outside of America. You’re supposed to have to prove you tried to hire Americans before you did the H-1B. The Department of Labor rule reads: “Such employers must take good faith steps to recruit U.S. workers for any job for which they seek H-1B workers.” They are also required to claim they are paying the H-1B the same salary they would pay an American.

Yet, it has been well-documented by the mainstream media itself that this procedure is never followed and there has never been an attempt to enforce it. A 2015 New York Times article explained that Disney had forced its primarily white staff to train their own replacements who were brought in on H-1B, which is the most extreme possible fraud on a visa system that is supposed to require you to vow that it’s impossible to hire an American for the job.

Musk turned this H-1B agenda, which flies in the face of Trump’s basic stated agenda as much as anything possibly could, into the biggest story in the world, rolled out an actual Indian to claim that Indian culture is superior to that of white Americans, and said he would die before allowing whites to have jobs.

In 2023, Bloomberg reported that in the wake of Floydmania, only 6% of new hires at S&P100 companies were white.

That statistic is virtually unbelievable, but in so far as we have any way to determine what is going on with white men in the work place, it has to be something like that.

The Trump administration’s stated agenda is to systematically lock real Americans out of the work place even further, based on the stated premise that they are inferior to Indians, and then silence them if they take issue with this agenda. And before you say “Trump didn’t say all that,” please note that both Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy are members of the Trump Administration.

Back in Total Orwellian Censorship at the Beginning of a Trump Administration!

It is bitterly hilarious that 8 years after the first mass censorship campaign, a second Trump election victory has taken place and we are entering a second phase of mass censorship. And don’t kid yourself, that is what this is: Elon is not going to censor less in the future. No one ever decides to do less censorship.

We need to continue to build outrage over all of this. Everyone still allowed on Twitter should be tweeting about nothing but this (and Israel) and provoking Elon into doing even more censorship.

Remember: if censorship is happening and there are people who are not being censored, than those people are either non-threats or they are active agents of the censors. Outside of something very basic and straightforward like “okay, I won’t say the n-word,” trying to avoid censorship by self-censoring either makes you useless or simply won’t work.

When I became the first person to be mass censored off of everything (still the most censored, by the way), people said “oh, it’s because you used such outrageous language.” Then everyone who tried to be so polite was also censored. Maybe they censored me first because they were able to take edgy jokes and present them as genuine statements I’d made, which made it so no one wanted to defend me (other than the LA Times, Sargon of Akkad, and a couple others). But everyone who was saying anything of value, no matter how politely they said it, ended up censored.

Granted, it’s possible that there will still be some okay content on Twitter for a while. I have no way of predicting a timeframe here. But while people maybe make some cutout for me, that I am uniquely dangerous like some kind of Magneto figure and therefore a site can be “free speech” while also censoring me for no reason other than because of who I am, Elon Musk is no longer even operating under a pretext of free speech.

I would of course argue, and did argue, that if I am censored, then “free speech” is already gone, and it’s only a matter of time before more censorship happens, because free speech is an either/or binary. Expecting Elon to honor his pledge was always ridiculous. The honor system does not work. If the government doesn’t defend speech rights, they do not exist.

It was mildly impressive that Twitter allowed some of the content that they allowed over the last two years. I will grant that. But we now know that this was always part of a scam Musk was running to build himself up as he apparently wants to use the political power he gains from Trump to become some kind of Techno Emperor.

Previously: Elon Now Mass Censoring People Who Question Replacing White Race with Indian Sewer Scum

Although Laura Loomer is obviously Jewish and a supporter of Israel, most of the other people who have been stripped of their blue checkmarks by Elon Musk on Twitter are critics of the Zionist state.

Stew Peters, for example, was responsible for a recent viral documentary about the Jews, while Jake Shields has been doing regular podcasts with top antisemites.

As far as I’m able to tell by looking at the punished accounts, all but Loomer were critics of Zionism, while the others were critics of both Zionism and the H-1B race replacement agenda. However, there is one Pakistani who lives in the UK, Sulaiman Ahmed, whose content is mostly about Israel and doesn’t appear to have been commenting on H-1B, which wouldn’t really have anything to do with him.

I found this tweet, where he mentions that Indians have found themselves in the “above criticism” category with the Jews.

Attacking Muslims, White and Black people = Free Speech

Attacking Indians and Jewish people = Hate speech

Two Tier X

— Sulaiman Ahmed (@ShaykhSulaiman) January 1, 2025

But that is after the fact; he’s noting it after his check was removed and his subscribers canceled.

While browsing his account just now, I found this:

IT WAS AN ELON TESLA CYBERTRUCK THAT EXPLODED OUTSIDE TRUMP TOWER IN LAS VEGAS

Is this a metaphor? pic.twitter.com/SogcYUmsyv

— Sulaiman Ahmed (@ShaykhSulaiman) January 1, 2025

Pretty good.

Going after Loomer was a wildly extreme move, which, if there was anything behind it other than Musk’s temper tantrum toddler personality, was meant to send a signal to everyone on the site that it is not just criticism of the Jews that will be censored.

What appears to be happening is that Elon Musk will use his control of Twitter to try to shape the narrative of right-wing media during the Trump administration, and that anything he does not agree with will be punished. Basically, it appears that he bought the site to use it for the exact same purpose that Democrats used it for before he bought it.

We have seen that this kind of targeted censorship is virtually impossible to maintain, however. Before Musk bought it, Twitter had become so unusable as a result of the censorship that it was uninteresting to everyone (both right and left, as the purpose of the site is largely arguing with opponents, as there are other social media that feed you things you like), and most of the staff that Elon laid off was an ever-expanding censorship team.

What would have been smart for Elon would be to lean into shadow banning and various other forms of algorithm manipulation. The media called shadow banning a conspiracy for years, as it was difficult to prove definitively, which gave plausible deniability. This is very obvious. If you can reduce someone’s exposure by 95%, and still claim to be a representative of free speech, that is clearly what you want to do with 99% of your opponents (I would apparently be in the 1% that is so dangerous you just have to ban them outright).

I’ve also seen several screenshots showing that a lot of popular anonymous accounts were banned outright for questioning the H-1B agenda, and probably for talking about Israel. None of those I saw were “real people” with names or even particularly popular anon accounts, but there does appear to have been large scale mass-banning already, so anyone arguing that removing the checkmark is somehow “not hard censorship” can’t use that weasel logic. Although you could argue that simply banning a person from running ads is “soft censorship,” restricting access and reach, including through this checkmark removal de-ranking system Musk has invented, is “hard censorship.”

What’s more, it’s also an Indian-like scam that he’s kept all of these people’s money after they paid for their blue check subscriptions. “Sorry saar, no refunds saar.” I don’t know why anyone would be surprised. Tesla was always an industrial-scale version of Indian-style welfare fraud.

While I was banned less than 3 months into Elon’s reign, and had been purposefully avoiding anything even remotely edgy (to the point where everyone on this website was complaining that my feed was too boring to read), and therefore understood that “free speech” was a total hoax, most people actually believed in it. Now, the censorship is blowing up, and there isn’t really any way to defend it. The bloated Irish drunk Steve Bannon is pulling out all the stops attacking Elon, and the mainstream media is covering that, and they are covering Laura’s situation. This is just incredibly stupid, to blow the whole wad like this before Trump is even in office, for literally no reason.

As I’ve said: there was no reason to even go out and talk about the H-1B system at all. Elon very easily could have used the algorithm of Twitter to bury this topic and the rest of the “right wing” media wouldn’t have made a big issue of it. Even still, Murdoch media is reporting that this discussion is about “highly skilled immigrants,” which is “safe and effective” levels of gaslighting. There is a totally separate category of visa for “exceptional” people, an O-1 visa.

This would hopefully be merely dozens of people per year, certainly less than 1,000, and I doubt that even hardcore racists would be able to make much of an issue of it.

H-1B is explicitly for non-exceptional people, and is instead for what might be called “emergency workers,” i.e., when you cannot find a person to fill the job in America and the only way to fill the position is to go outside of America. You’re supposed to have to prove you tried to hire Americans before you did the H-1B. The Department of Labor rule reads: “Such employers must take good faith steps to recruit U.S. workers for any job for which they seek H-1B workers.” They are also required to claim they are paying the H-1B the same salary they would pay an American.

Yet, it has been well-documented by the mainstream media itself that this procedure is never followed and there has never been an attempt to enforce it. A 2015 New York Times article explained that Disney had forced its primarily white staff to train their own replacements who were brought in on H-1B, which is the most extreme possible fraud on a visa system that is supposed to require you to vow that it’s impossible to hire an American for the job.

Musk turned this H-1B agenda, which flies in the face of Trump’s basic stated agenda as much as anything possibly could, into the biggest story in the world. He rolled out an actual Indian to claim that Indian culture is superior to that of white Americans, and said he would die before allowing whites to have jobs.

In 2023, Bloomberg reported that in the wake of Floydmania, only 6% of new hires at S&P 100 companies were white.

That statistic is virtually unbelievable, but insofar as we have any way to determine what is going on with white men in the workplace, it has to be something like that.

The Trump administration’s stated agenda is to systematically lock real Americans out of the workplace even further, based on the stated premise that they are inferior to Indians, and then silence them if they take issue with this agenda. And before you say “Trump didn’t say all that,” please note that both Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy are members of the Trump Administration.

Back in Total Orwellian Censorship at the Beginning of a Trump Administration!

It is bitterly hilarious that 8 years after the first mass censorship campaign, a second Trump election victory has taken place and we are entering a second phase of mass censorship. And don’t kid yourself, that is what this is: Elon is not going to censor less in the future. No one ever decides to do less censorship.

We need to continue to build outrage over all of this. Everyone still allowed on Twitter should be tweeting about nothing but this (and Israel) and provoking Elon into doing even more censorship.

Remember: if censorship is happening and there are people who are not being censored, then those people are either non-threats or they are active agents of the censors. Outside of something very basic and straightforward like “okay, I won’t say the n-word,” trying to avoid censorship by self-censoring either makes you useless or simply won’t work.

When I became the first person to be mass censored off of everything (still the most censored, by the way), people said “oh, it’s because you used such outrageous language.” Then everyone who tried to be so polite was also censored. Maybe they censored me first because they were able to take edgy jokes and present them as genuine statements I’d made, which made it so no one wanted to defend me (other than the LA Times, Sargon of Akkad, and a couple others). But everyone who was saying anything of value, no matter how politely they said it, ended up censored.

Granted, it’s possible that there will still be some okay content on Twitter for a while. I have no way of predicting a timeframe here. But while people maybe make some cutout for me, that I am uniquely dangerous like some kind of Magneto figure and therefore a site can be “free speech” while also censoring me for no reason other than because of who I am, Elon Musk is no longer even operating under a pretext of free speech.

I would of course argue, and did argue, that if I am censored, then “free speech” is already gone, and it’s only a matter of time before more censorship happens, because free speech is an either/or binary. Expecting Elon to honor his pledge was always ridiculous. The honor system does not work. If the government doesn’t defend speech rights, they do not exist.

It was mildly impressive that Twitter allowed some of the content that they allowed over the last two years. I will grant that. But we now know that this was always part of a scam Musk was running to build himself up, as he apparently wants to use the political power he gains from Trump to become some kind of Techno Emperor.

The blacks are having a breakdown because people are angry that the most primitive gorilla bitch was cast as Juliette in a much-hyped version of Shakespeare’s (currently) most famous play.

The Guardian:

More than 800 predominantly Black female and non-binary actors have signed an open letter in solidarity with Francesca Amewudah-Rivers, who has been targeted with online racial abuse after the announcement of her casting in a new production of Romeo & Juliet.

Lashana Lynch, Sheila Atim and Marianne Jean-Baptiste are among the 883 signatories of the letter, alongside actors Lolly Adefope, Freema Agyeman, Wunmi Mosaku, and Tamara Lawrance.

It reads: “Too many times, Black performers – particularly Black actresses – are left to face the storm of online abuse after committing the crime of getting a job on their own.”

It comes after a statement by the Jamie Lloyd theatre company condemning the “barrage of deplorable racial abuse” that has been directed at Amewudah-Rivers and saying further harassment would be reported.

The abuse, the company – run by the director Jamie Lloyd – said, followed the announcement of the show’s cast including Amewudah-Rivers as Juliet and Tom Holland as Romeo.

Wednesday’s letter, which was organised by Enola Holmes actor Susan Wokoma and the writer Somalia Nonyé Seaton, stated: “When news of Francesca Amewudah-Rivers’ casting in Jamie Lloyd’s production of Romeo and Juliet was announced so many people celebrated and welcomed this news. Many of us took to social media to shower our baby sis with love and congratulations – a huge deal for someone so young in their career. A huge rising talent.

“But then what followed was a too familiar horror that many of us visible Black dark skinned performers have experienced. The racist and misogynistic abuse directed at such a sweet soul has been too much to bear. For a casting announcement of a play to ignite such twisted ugly abuse is truly embarrassing for those so empty and barren in their own lives that they must meddle in hateful abuse.”

…

The signatories welcomed the theatre company’s statement and said they hoped it would “extend to committed emotional support for Francesca on her journey with the production”.

They added: “Too many times theatre companies, broadcasters, producers and streamers have failed to offer any help or support when their Black artists face racist or misogynistic abuse. Reporting is too often left on the shoulders of the abused, who are also then expected to promote said show.

“We want to send a clear message to Francesca and all Black women performers who face this kind of abuse – we see you. We see the art you manage to produce with not only the pressures that your white colleagues face but with the added traumatic hurdle of misogynoir. We are so excited to watch you shine.”

I am not totally unsympathetic to this bitch on a basic, personal level. She’s just trying to get money like any person does, and is being derided in a mean way as a primitive simian. It’s human enough to feel pity for her.

But these people who wrote this letter, unbeknownst to them, hit the nail on the head when they said that the theater company failed to offer any support for her. Obviously, the theater company knew that this bitch would be attacked, relentlessly, over this casting, and they believed – rightly so – that this wave of attacks would create large hype around their production. Everyone understands the current climate. Everyone understands that white people are being replaced with blacks, and that white people are rightfully angry about this. So they offer this job to some black bitch, who is fairly enough just trying to get money (like anyone is), so they can play off of the attacks she receives.

There are some issues that people have with blacks taking over white productions and claiming them for themselves. However, I think in general, no one really cares if the blacks want to do their own Shakespeare production. What really upset people about this is that the guy playing Romeo is white – that obvious homosexual boy from Spider-Man.

It’s only natural and obvious that people are going to think this is disgusting and offensive.

This is to say: the theater company that cast her alongside this white man did so with the intent of putting her in a position to be viciously attacked by people from the internet. Again, they knew that this was a very easy way to create massive hype around their production. If they had cast a white woman as Juliette – and frankly, if they had cast a black Romeo alongside this black Juliette – they would not have gotten any of this hype.

The point is: whites feel, rightly, that they are being attacked by this production. It has nothing to do with wanting to hurt the feelings of the poor black bitch who is just trying to make money (like anyone is). But the producers knew that there would be outrage, because they knew that this was an attack on whites. They also knew that the media would hype up this outrage, and claim it is pure evil, and make it so people who buy tickets to this show feel they are very moral.

That is to say: the attacks on the black bitch, and the media response, are all just part of a viral marketing campaign designed to hype up this production, which would otherwise not matter to anyone.

Obviously, there are Jews who want to attack white people with this sort of thing. But we now have a consistent dynamic where these bizarre race-swapping productions – very often involving the ugliest blacks imaginable mixing with attractive white people – create outrage, and the media always frames it the same way, and this allows for producers trying to make money to exploit this dynamic for hype.

No one attacking this production is doing so in order to hurt this ape woman’s feelings. In general, most people do not do things for the purpose of hurting someone’s feelings. The people attacking this production are doing so because they feel they are under attack. But the media will always reduce it to someone’s feelings, because that appeals to women who are the primary drivers of outrage over white men being outraged.

This thing about people’s feelings is used constantly in the media to distract from the real issues involved in any story. The Jeffrey Epstein saga was the biggest spy scandal in the last century, but instead of talking about the fact that the Jewish Mossad was running a massive blackmail ring in America, we instead heard about how the hookers involved were very sad victims of some kind of unspecific abuse. All of the important aspects of the story were buried by media hype over hookers having their feelings hurt.

Just so, there is a very real issue that is raised by the replacement of white people in their own media, and the use of race-swapping in media to attack and degrade whites as a whole. There is a lot to talk about here. But none of it gets talked about because it is very easy for the media to cover all of that discussion up with talk about how a black girl’s feelings are hurt.

I’m sure a lot of people don’t care about this girl’s feelings. Personally, though I have no intention to hurt her feelings, I don’t actually care. However, at the same time, no one is explicitly trying to hurt her feelings. That would be ridiculous. People are outraged over the fact that this is obviously an attack on white people, and white people logically feel that an attack on white people is an attack on them personally, their families, their culture, their history, their identity.

It is very ridiculous, the way the media is able to reduce everything to childish stories about people having hurt feelings. It completely prevents discussion of any serious issue.

Charlie Kirk and most other people in the “conservative movement” are telling us that they don’t want to flood us with millions upon millions of Mexicans and Moslems, and instead want to flood us with millions upon millions of Indians.

To excuse this agenda, they will cite the fact that these people are nearly as rich as the Jews.

They claim that “America is not a country, it is an idea,” and though they aren’t really very specific on what that idea is, it appears to be that the idea is “this is a marketplace where people come to make money.”

That doesn’t seem like a very good idea to replace a country with. I just wanted to live in a country, have a family, work a satisfying job, go to church and live to spend time with my grandkids. I never wanted to be involved in some weird experimental “idea nation.” And I’m not sure when this was voted on, but I would have voted against it, had I been given the opportunity.

But at least the “conservatives” are consistent. The Indians do make money.

I think that because we are being replaced with these people, we should study them, and see how this will transform America. Obviously, no one can argue that when we replace our population with Indians, our country will not become more Indian.

So what will this look like, we ask.

And thus we have the first installment of “Tales From India,” in which we look at various tales from the culture that Charlie Kirk, National Review and Ben Shapiro intend to make the defining culture of America.

I will give it to them: Indians do seem to understand the concept of a “nation of ideas,” as our first story today illustrates.

AFP:

An Indian guru facing rape and sexual abuse charges made headlines Wednesday after he emerged from hiding and announced the birth of a new cosmic country with its own cabinet and golden passports.

Swami Nithyananda, a controversial self-styled godman with thousands of followers in southern India’s Karnataka and Tamil Nadu states, posted a video on his YouTube channel announcing the special project to his followers.

41-year-old Nithyananda announced that his country is called Kailaasa, and is the biggest Hindu nation without boundaries.

“The Hindu nation exists in cosmos,” he said in the now-viral video.

Local media reports cited a website allegedly created by the guru with details about his plans for Kailaasa, even as the police and other authorities investigating him for various criminal charges continue to remain clueless about his whereabouts.

The website shares details of different government departments and agencies in his make-believe country, including homeland security, commerce, treasury, housing, technology and one for enlightened civilisation.

It also gives Kailaasa its own triangular flag and an emblem with Indian Tamil, Sanskrit and English as its main languages.

Though not convicted, Nithyananda first made national headlines in 2010 after he was arrested and jailed for 53 days over a sex scandal involving him and a regional actress.

Subsequently, some other women also accused him of abusing them at his religious retreat in Karnataka.

Last month, a case was registered against him in the western Indian state Gujarat on charges of wrongful confinement of children.

Indian media reports said that police believe he fled the country during the investigation.

“So far what we know is that he is not in the Ashram (his retreat) here for almost a year,” a police officer told the Press Trust of India.

“This is one of the 10 to 15 Ashrams he has nationwide. His main areas of operation are Tamil Nadu and Gujarat,” he added.

Nithyananda is one of several Indian gurus who’ve faced charges ranging from murders, sexual assaults, rapes and financial frauds over the last few years.

Okay, well, I have to admit – this guy sounds pretty based.

I’m not really sure I can argue that this cosmic country idea would be better than the idea of GDP.

Swami Nithyananda even got white people involved in this cosmic sex cult he created.

I dunno, that chick might be part Indian, but her name is “Sarah Stephanie Landry.” She’s from Canada.

She says the magical rituals of Swami Nithyananda are not actually real.

But whether it’s real or not, it’s still better than what we have now.

So I guess this tale from India is a check mark in favor of Charlie Kirk’s plan, because Charlie Kirk wants to replace our nation and culture with this sort of thing.

I mean, this looks like a pretty fun time to me.

Let us rate the quality of the next story of the culture we will soon be overtaken by, according to Kirkians.

The gang rape and murder of vegetarians.

Fox News:

Indian police are being declared heroes Friday after they shot and killed four men suspected of raping and killing a young woman in southern India just a week earlier.

Last Thursday, the remains of a 27-year-old veterinarian were discovered by a passerby at an underpass in the town of Shadnager, near Hyderabad, after she left her scooter at a toll booth for a medical visit the night before.

Wait wait wait.

Are we talking about a vegetarian or a veterinarian?

The four men — between the ages of 20 and 26 — allegedly deflated her scooter and took her to a truck yard to repair it. Soon after, they assaulted and suffocated the woman before burning her body, according to Sky News.

The outlet reported the men had been taken into custody and escorted to the murder scene early on Friday for a crime reconstruction where they attempted to steal the guns of local police.

The men died in “crossfire” with police after trying to take the weapons, police said.

ROFLMAO.

“While the reconstruction and investigations were on, one of the accused signaled to the others and tried to escape,” senior officer Prakash Reddy told the outlet. “They then tried to snatch weapons from the guard and fired on the police. They were killed in the crossfire.”

The officers who shot the men were hailed as heroes. They were showered with rose petals by residents in the streets of Hyderabad on Friday to celebrate what many believed was justice for the crimes.

The case had caused a national uproar in India, with one member of government calling for a public lynching of the accused. People poured into the streets — with firecrackers exploding throughout the city and traffic being halted to a standstill, according to the New York Times

“The law has done its duty,” V.C. Sajjanar, a top police official told the outlet.

This is kinda fun.

I enjoy a good lynching.

And since it appears that it was a veterinarian that was raped and murdered and not a vegetarian, I guess the suspects deserved it.

Lynching criminals before trial is objectively better than the current “criminal justice reform” plans to just let criminals out of prison even after they’re convicted.

So I guess this tale from India is yet another mark in favor of the Charlie Kirk “Indian replacement” agenda.

After these two tales, I’m actually looking forward to our population being completely cleansed and replaced with Indians.

Godspeed, Charlie.

May your dreams manifest sooner rather than later.

Disney has released its trailer for the remake of Mulan, which they are making as part of their program to redo all of the classic Disney cartoons as live-action films in order to destroy everyone’s childhood memories.

And just like they replaced white Ariel from The Little Mermaid with a negroid, they are also replacing Mulan with a negroid.

The Chinese character of Mulan will be played by black actress Octavia Spencer.

Because after all, Mulan isn’t a true story, so the character can be any race. The fragile Chinese people who are complaining about this are simply weak and pathetic.

This is equal opportunity race replacement – everyone gets BLACKED.

At least this is fair, and Disney is just saying “from now on, everyone is going to be black, because we don’t want to acknowledge that other races exist at all.”

lol, jk.

Mulan will be played by lovely Chinese actress Liu Yifei.

Because according to the Iron Law of race replacement, it is only white people who do not have a right to exist, and thus must be replaced by negroes.

It’s not clear why the Iron Law of race replacement exists at all, and white characters are being replaced by blacks in Disney films, though it is widely suspected that it is because Disney is run by Jews who are obsessed with exterminating the white race.

There’s a big fuss in the Swiss MSM just now about a photo of a Zurich school class that was being circulated on social media by members of the “far right” PNOS party (Partei der Eidgenossen) [Eidgenossen literally means oathbound but is also used to refer to the Swiss people in general].

All these crazed right-wing extremists did was comment on the nature of the demographic change clearly underway in Switzerland, variously known as the Great Replacement or White Genocide. But Swiss establishment figures have claimed this was a terrible intrusion into the privacy of the children. They are considering legal action against PNOS. Child welfare experts are now calling for schools not to publish classroom photographs on the internet so that white folks seeking to resist their own extinction – AKA the “Alt Right” – will not be able to observe how White Genocide is progressing.

Below you see the original photograph that provoked the discussion together with the blurred-up version of it being used to illustrate the stories in the Swiss MSM. As you can see there is only one child with what we might call a “traditionally Swiss” appearance and name.

Lügenpresse version: