We’ve often said that the IQ of a country is related to the temperature.

This is because in colder climates, people have to plan ahead to make sure they are going to be able to eat, so stupider people tend to die and not breed. In warmer climates, food is abundant all year around, so there is no real need to be super-smart in order to survive and reproduce. People in warmer areas were also not required to figure out complicated ways to keep from freezing to death.

We’ve now put together a chart comparing the average daily temperature of countries to their IQs. You will notice that in general, the higher the temperature, the lower the IQ. This is only not true in places like Singapore, where people from a Northern climate migrated in recent years to a Southern area.

Apparently, boomers still don’t really have a very good grasp of where we are right now, in terms of the religion of black worship. Or maybe they just don’t understand that Zoom isn’t a private conversation.

Of course, maybe they understand both, and we’re all just barely holding it together under this virus regime.

Here’s what’s clear: you can’t say anything, in public or in private, about black people. It doesn’t matter if it’s a fact, and it doesn’t matter what you mean by it. You can’t say it.

The Hill:

Georgetown Law has fired a professor for “reprehensible” comments about Black students that were shared online.

Dean of Georgetown Law Bill Treanor said he was “appalled” by the “reprehensible” statements made by former professor Sandra Sellers and David Batson, another professor who was placed on administration leave, in a letter to the Georgetown Law community on Thursday.

Treanor said he spoke with both professors while reviewing the incident for further context.

“I informed Professor Sellers that I was terminating her relationship with Georgetown Law effective immediately. During our conversation, she told me that she had intended to resign. As a result of my decision, Professor Sellers is no longer affiliated with Georgetown Law,” Treanor said.

Batson has been placed on administrative leave pending an investigation by the school’s Office of Diversity, Equity and Affirmative Action. Batson will not be involved in courses while the investigation is being conducted.

“This is by no means the end of our work to address the many structural issues of racism reflected in this painful incident, including explicit and implicit bias, bystander responsibility, and the need for more comprehensive anti-bias training,” Treanor added.

“Bystander responsibility” is a new term you’re going to really start hearing a lot. This is the end of the project of “white silence is violence.” It basically means that if anyone says anything against the official state dogma in your presence, you have to attack them on the spot, and then tattle on them.

Here is the video.

.@GeorgetownLaw negotiations Professors Sandra Sellers and David Batson being openly racist on a recorded Zoom call.

Beyond unacceptable. pic.twitter.com/q5MoWjBok8

— Hassan Ahmad (@hahmad1996) March 10, 2021

Sellers says:

You know what, I hate to say this, I end up having this angst every semister that a lot of my lower ones are blacks. Happens almost every semister, and it’s like, oh come on. There’s some really good ones. But there are also some that are just plain at the bottom. It drives me crazy.

Batson replies “em-em.”

It’s a noncontroversial fact that blacks as a group score significantly lower in every academic field. The mainstream explanation for this is that it’s because of slavery, and because people hate them because of the color of their skin.

The scientific explanation of course is that blacks have lower IQs, due to evolutionary biology. Obviously, blacks are better at basketball than whites, and they run much faster, so I think it is accepted that there are physiological differences between blacks and whites. But those differences can only be mentioned if they are about blacks being better at something than white people.

The situation is not really confusing in any way. Blacks come from a continent that is fertile and lush, and does not have winter. This means that they did not have to plan out complex systems to keep from starving to death. There is fruit everywhere in African jungles, and fish are plentiful.

Meanwhile in Europe, people had to hunt mammals, and they had to plan for the winter months.

What this means is that if you were born in Europe with a lower IQ, you would be much more likely to end up dying in the winter from the elements. That means that over the course of thousands of years, people with higher IQs were breeding with each other, which led to whites developing much higher average IQs.

This same thing is true of people from Central and South America. If you look at a map of global average IQ, you find that it is very correlated to the climate.

(South America is lighter because it was heavily colonized by Europeans.)

What this means, unfortunately, is that blacks are never really going to get along with white society, at least not if they are expected to compete as equals.

It doesn’t mean that blacks are “bad” or anything else. As I said, there are things that blacks are better at than whites. They are very fast runners, because there were a lot of large cats in Africa, which would semi-regularly eat humans.

Although it is uncomfortable to say it, it is also a fact that cannibalism was a big part of many West African cultures. There was also a lot of war. All of the early missionaries and explorers described this, including David Livingstone. Livingstone was very fond of the Africans, and certainly had no reason to make this up.

The Emin Pasha Relief Expedition in the 1880s was led by Henry Morton Stanley, a journalist and lunatic who I have a lot of respect for as a writer and as a man. Stanley famously met Livingstone on the journey, and finding him as the only white man in the middle of Africa, said “Dr. Livingstone, I presume.” During that expedition, James S. Jameson of the Jameson Whiskey family bought an 11-year-old slave girl and gave her as a gift to a cannibal tribe because he wanted to document the process of killing and eating a human.

I’m just trying to find some information about this online, and it’s hard to do, it seems to have been largely cleansed. But if you read the works of any of the early explorers of Africa, you’re going to find out about cannibalism as a widespread phenomenon.

As we know, cannibalism still happens in Africa. We have probably all seen the old VICE documentary “Cannibal Warlords of Liberia.”

Cannibalism as a cultural norm is going to lead to high levels of aggression and violence, as well as good running skills.

So this sort of background is very much different than that of Europeans, and these differences, over thousands of years, shaped the genetics of the populations.

Expecting equal outcomes in academia is no different than expecting whites to compete well, on average, in sprinting.

The question is: who does it help to claim that blacks are just as capable as whites in academic performance?

Does it help black people to tell them they are just as likely to become successful in academia as whites, and that the only reason they are doing poorly is because of a conspiracy against them by white people?

How on earth does that help the blacks?

The fact is, some blacks are uniquely intelligent, and can do well in academia, just like some whites are uniquely fast, and can compete in certain black-dominated sports. But we’re talking about statistics here, which are not in question.

Telling blacks to go to universities that are built for whites, then telling them that any trouble they have with learning is white people’s fault, is simply cruel to everyone involved, not least the blacks themselves.

This is why, as a matter of principle, I have always promoted the concept of “black self-determination.” I think they need their own institutions, run by their own people, which are designed for their own specific needs.

James Watson, the “Father of DNA,” communicated this same concept.

Here’s from an article from The Independent, January 13, 2019:

The greatest upset came when Dr Watson told an interviewer from the Sunday Times in 2007 he was “inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa” because “all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – where all the testing says not really”.

He added that while he would like everyone to be equal, “people who have to deal with black employees find this is not true”. These remarks, which have been universally derided as based on incredibly shaky scientific foundations, led to a forced retirement for Dr Watson from his chancellor role at Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory.

In the new documentary on PBS celebrating his life, an interviewer asks the 90-year-old scientist if, given the backlash he suffered after his comments about race and intelligence, his views had changed. His answer leaves no room for uncertainty: “No, not at all,” he says. “There’s a difference on the average between blacks and whites on IQ tests. I would say the difference is genetic.”

This man won the Nobel Prize for literally discovering DNA.

The media of course framed him as a hater, but his entire point was that trying to force Africans to follow the same system as whites is only going to lead to misery, as they are genetically different.

There are blacks that would agree about this. In fact, I’m not aware of any blacks currently who actually believe in the Martin Luther King Jr. idea of “we’re all the same and it’s just the color of the skin.”

Joe Biden’s pick for the head of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division has written that blacks are genetically superior to whites. If they want to frame things that way, that doesn’t offend me personally, because the important thing is that they recognize the differences are genetic, and understand that we need different systems, and that above all, we need to divorce our two races. We have tried integration, and it has failed miserably. If we had put all of this energy into a functional system of segregation, everyone would be a lot happier.

There are people on the earth who will look at this and claim that the explanation is “racism.”

The Hill:

Black North Carolina voters are seeing their ballots rejected at twice the rate of white residents in North Carolina, a study by a University of Florida (UF) elections expert reported.

Black voters in the state are seeing around 4 percent of ballots rejected. Voter advocates say this is because a higher proportion of Black voters are voting by mail for the first time, leading to minor mistakes that nullify votes.

The data was collected by the U.S. Elections Project and managed by Michael McDonald, a UF professor who specializes in American elections.

The race of voters is disclosed in the data because voters can list their race when registering in North Carolina.

Elections officials report the three most common mistakes leading to ballot rejection are omitted signatures, lack of a witness signature, or blank address lines, according to Bloomberg.

T. Anthony Spearman, president of the North Carolina chapter of the NAACP, told Bloomberg that African Americans had favored voting in person in past elections, adding for many “this is their first time” voting by mail.

“These mistakes are prone to happen,” Spearman said.

Anyone who has their ballot rejected will be notified and given the opportunity to make corrections, elections officials said. Around 55 percent of ballots that have been received came from Democrats, and 16 percent came from Republicans.

Hilary Harris Klein, an attorney with the voting rights group Southern Coalition for Social Justice, said despite the ability to rectify invalidated ballots, “There is cause for concern when you look at the racial disparity.”

Obviously, the explanation is not racism.

It is black literacy rates.

There is no way that people with literacy levels that low are going to have the same competence in filling out forms as people with an average literacy rate.

If you want to blame abysmal black literacy rates on racism, then, well… we’re going to have to start talking about IQ.

If you want to blame the IQ gap on racism, then at that point, we’re going to have no choice but to start talking about Jews.

The media constantly talks about how “race” is equivalent to “skin color.” Obviously, that’s something of an oversimplification, even if you believe in the media narrative. At the very least, a “race is only skin deep” theorist would admit that the facial features are unique between the races, something which we notice on albino negroes.

Albino negroes are actually freakish. Nature made the negro features to fit their skin color.

Of course, everyone on earth fundamentally understands that there is more to race than skin color. Most white people don’t say it, because they were first convinced it was impolite to say it, then they were threatened with having their entire life destroyed for saying it.

Those like myself who are willing to deal with the consequences for the sake of defending truth will usually first note that the most meaningful biological gap between races is the IQ gap. The average white IQ across virtually all European and diaspora countries is 100 or just around there. Some African nations have average IQs below 70, while American negroes have an average IQ of 80.

The Jews continue to claim that IQ can significantly change as a result of education. They will try to dazzle you with gibberish when presenting this claim, but the ultimate reality is that while it would be hard to find a white person who has had no education in modern times, anyone can understand that an uneducated Chinese rice farmer has an IQ fully 30 points higher than a Somalian who attended a United Nations funded high school, and 40 points higher than an Australian Aboriginal who attended a normal Western school.

By the way, to be clear, when I say “the Jews” make this claim, I don’t mean that in a general sense, but rather a very specific sense. Everyone who promotes this agenda shares the blood of those who murdered our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ – those who view truth the same way that a normal person views a baby rapist. The claim that “race doesn’t exist” was originally forwarded by the Jew Franz Boas, who claimed that babies’ skulls were a different shape based on what continent they are born on. He said that your race would change if you were born in a different place. Boas died in 1942, and although the development of genetics proved his theory retarded, it would take six decades for scientists to get around to testing the obviously retarded claim about morphing skulls and proving it false. Boas had falsified the data, in order to push lies about the nature of race.

Today, if you Google around about race and IQ, you’ll find that it is still Jews promoting the idea that there is no genetic basis to it, more or less exclusively.

Basically, the claim that race is a “social construct” is a prerequisite for the Jewish plan to create a borderless one world government ruled by Jews. It’s important to them. They’ve pushed it so hard that it’s now affecting the science of human genetics. Last year, an Indian woman, Angela Saini, wrote a celebrated book, “Superior,” in which she argued that genetic research was “enabling racism,” and basically claimed that the entire science of human genetics needed to be curtailed, as it leads people to believe in racial differences which, according to her, do not exist.

Saini lives in Britain and identifies as “British.” So it is a fight she has a dog in. Jews encourage this sort of thing, obviously, because they don’t want to be the only ones saying it. It’s a general Jewish strategy to indoctrinate brown people and women to serve as proxies for their various nefarious agendas against the White Christian Man.

There are of course other differences beyond appearance and intelligence. Negroes, for instance, tend to have significantly higher testosterone levels. In actual fact, some studies have shown that the average African-American male has more than 15% higher testosterone than the average white male.

This makes logical sense. In Africa, children (and adults for that matter) had a much higher chance of dying than in Europe or Asia, due to various environmental factors which are presumably self-explanatory. This meant that Africans had to have a higher birth rate in order to replace the people they were losing. That meant they needed to be a horny people. Testosterone provides the sex drive for both men and women. Further, excess testosterone is associated with aggression and violence.

Abated by the low IQ, the high birthrate created a feedback loop, where the number of children blacks were having led to very low-effort parenting. A negro child must then fend for himself very early on, due to the lack of effort expended on him by his parents. That starts very early. A black infant can hold his own head up without support almost immediately after birth, while a white infant needs to be lying down or have someone hold his head until he is 6 months old. Blacks then experience all developmental milestones earlier than whites, up through puberty.

These differences in levels of childcare are presently on full display with the case of Lovely Peaches (Brittany Johnson), a black TikToker.

This 19-year-old woman has claimed publicly to be beating, torturing, pimping out and otherwise physically abusing her 2-year-old daughter. One woman doing this could be a fluke. What could not be a fluke is that all of her fans are black, while all of the whites who see her videos are begging for the police to come take her children from her.

Blacks have a culture that almost completely disregards the wellbeing of children, and which glorifies violence. They watch this sort of thing and laugh, and maybe say something like, “man, that bitch fuggggged up! She off the hook!” They do not have any instinct to help the child, nor are they repulsed by the abuse.

Last month, the entirely white group of people opposing her child abuse regime apparently succeeded in having Lovely Peaches’ child taken from her.

So Lovely Peaches will no longer be allowed to visit her daughter Cora, according to Children’s Riot and Salvation Foundation. They also say the FBI has opened an investigation into Peaches, and Cora will not live with Peaches’s parents but with other family members. is this a W? pic.twitter.com/bzUblU6D9u

— Destiny ☯️ (@drdestiny) August 7, 2020

What is notable is that in virtually every other context – up to and often including the context of murder itself – black people are above reproach in our society. Child abuse appears to be the one place where white people are willing to openly criticize blacks. There was even a boomer involved.

Imagine it – a boomer criticizing a black person!

This is the extent to which white people care about the protection of children.

It’s a fascinating look into the differences, and certainly demonstrates that they are not abstract or theoretical, but very real and meaningful differences that affect the most basic functioning of society, and arguably make it either difficult or impossible to maintain a peaceful society with both white and black citizens.

You should watch this video.

Kathy Zhu wants me to vote for Donald Trump.

And pretty much I just want to do whatever Kathy Zhu wants me to do.

Punished Zhu was stripped of her Miss Michigan crown for trying to redpill the laowai on black crime and the bell curve.

Miss World America's State/National/Chief Director accused me of being racist, Islamaphobic, and insensitive.

They stripped me of my Miss Michigan title due to my refusal to try on a hijab in 2018, my tweet about black on black gun violence, and "insensitive" statistical tweets. pic.twitter.com/K1Btho0Pgq

— Kathy Zhu (@PoliticalKathy) July 19, 2019

Now she’s been hired by Team Trump, which is becoming progressively more and more anti-black, for reasons that are not yet totally clear.

I am so excited to now be part of the #WomenforTrump Coalition Advisory Board!

Let’s get Trump re-elected for 2020 🇺🇸😁 https://t.co/uhdBfdInlh

— Kathy Zhu (@PoliticalKathy) July 26, 2019

With this brilliant move, Trump has officially solidified the gook fetishist vote and the anti-black vote with one fell swoop. Although to be fair, those groups have nearly 100% overlap.

Trump’s switch toward anti-black racism from anti-Mexican and anti-Islamic racism has not been subtle. All of a sudden he just started talking about how blacks should go back to Africa and how Baltimore is a shithole.

Then he hires everyone’s absolute favorite anti-black qt pie/Chinese spy.

Basically, this appears to be a way to distract from the fact that none of his anti-immigrant racism manifested as policy. He’s just getting people excited by promoting a new form of racism, and starting internet race wars with the blacks.

Whatever.

It’s working on me.

I just want to see Trump call Kathy Zhu on stage saying “Kathy, come up here. Get up here. This girl is Asian, so you know, she’s very good at math. Great with math, the Asians. I don’t know how they see all those numbers with their small eyes. She’s good at math and she’s been running the numbers on black IQ, and it’s not good, folks. Not good. It definitely explains what we’ve been seeing in Baltimore and where else.”

View this post on Instagram

Thinkin’ about me?

A post shared by Kathy Zhu (@katzhux) on Oct 24, 2017 at 8:22pm PDT

This man literally discovered DNA. But he is evil now, because he thinks the difference in white and black DNA accounts for the difference in performance.

Make no mistake about it.

James Watson is falling on his sword – all the way on his sword – in the name of truth, science, justice and the future of the white race on planet earth.

He is also doing a secular version of the Christian concept of “building treasures in Heaven.” He knows that he will die with people believing in the bizarro world religious doctrine that “race is a social construct.” But he also knows that after his death, the order of truth will be restored, and he will stand vindicated.

After all, the idea that all races are exactly the same (save for skin color, bone structure, brain size, etc.) is a doctrine that only existed in the heads of a few Jews at Columbia when he was born in 1928, and would have been laughed at anywhere outside of the humanities departments of universities when he was making all of his scientific breakthroughs while in his twenties and thirties.

In fact, the issue did not become controversial until 1994, when The Bell Curve was published. And there was a gigantic discussion of the issue in academia at the time, and no one who sided with biological science was witch hunted and burned at the stakes as Watson has been.

He knows and I know that this illusion can only be sustained for a short period of time. Either civilization itself will fall – in which case, he will just be another evil “old white man,” and his legacy will disappear when negro cannibals burn the universities – or we will return to the sanity of science and rational thought, in which case he will be praised as a hero for falling on his sword in defense of truth in this dark age.

It is an easy bet to make for a man who understands that there is more to life than being praised as morally righteous by a decadent and depraved authoritarian voodoo system.

RT:

Ninety-year-old Nobel Prize-winning scientist James Watson has been stripped of his honorary titles by a leading American research institution, after doubling down on his controversial conclusions linking race and intelligence.

Despite nearly half a century service to the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL), Watson, a world-renowned geneticist, lost all of his honorary titles of Chancellor Emeritus, Oliver R. Grace Professor Emeritus and Honorary Trustee, for refusing to retract his own scientific conclusions.

In 2007, Watson was suspended from all of his positions held at the New York lab following a scandal centering around his claim about the “inherently gloomy” future of the African continent. “All our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really,” he told the Times newspaper at the time.

That is a fact. It isn’t disputed that the testing shows this. No one disputes that.

Even when economic status and education level is included in the testing, Africans simply do not demonstrate anything close to the intelligence levels of whites and East Asians.

In fact, the children of black college graduates test slightly lower than the children of white high school dropouts.

What is disputed is something much more vague and weird, which is whether the results of these tests are actually due to something other than biology. They don’t say specifically what that something is. They throw suggestions out there, sometimes blaming white people for blacks having such low IQs.

While having initially issued an apology for his comments, allowing him to maintain his honorary titles at the CSHL, when asked more than a decade later whether his views about race and intelligence have changed, he told the PBS documentary they haven’t.

“Not at all. I would like for them to have changed, that there be new knowledge that says that your nurture is much more important than nature,” the scientist was quoted as saying in a recently previewed PBS documentary, titled American Masters: Decoding Watson. “There’s a difference on the average between blacks and whites on IQ tests. I would say the difference is, it’s genetic.”

This is the definition of “honor.”

Right here, kids.

The university referred to his statements as being “unsubstantiated” remarks.

Of course, he did not say this as absolute fact. He simply stated that his own opinion had not changed, and suggested that it was possible for new research to emerge which would paint a different picture.

He also expressed regret over the fact that there hasn’t been any new research to show that differences in performance are due to environmental factors. And I can share that regret.

It would certainly be a lot easier to deal with the world if the Jews were correct, and biological differences between humans did not exist.

Let me tell you: regardless of what the Jews at the SPLC and the NYT claim, I do not harbor any “hatred for the color of the skin.” My entire belief system is based around the scientific reality that there are biological differences between the races. If having slightly uglier grandchildren would be the only negative consequence of the globalist interracialist agenda, I would not have given my life for the cause of fighting for the continued existence of white people.

The differences in intelligence do exist, and they are going to shape the future. If we allow for the Jewish-globalist agenda to succeed, it will mean that our grandchildren will at best be living at the level of a Brazilian ghetto.

And their own children will at best return to stone age conditions, such as those we see in primitive Africa.

I say “at best” on that count, because it may well be impossible for a primitive Negroid-based race to return to a primitive lifestyle in 150 or 200 years. Most or all of the natural world will have been destroyed after the initial wave of half-breeds takes over white civilization. Furthermore, the ways of primitive life will have been lost. So it may simply be that this program will lead to complete extermination of all life on earth beyond the level of the insect, as cannibals eat one another and all other living things as they sweep across the remains of a dead earth.

If the Jews were to have their way.

Of course, currently it does appear that the Chinese will not allow the Jews to have their way, and will maintain a technological civilization as the white world drives itself into extinction at the behest of crazed Jewish overlords.

Though I cannot be certain that Jews will not overrun China, it appears that they probably will not, and will only take the white man down with them.

So I guess this is some consolation.

But it isn’t very much consolation.

Though life will continue on earth, the Chinese will continue their program of breeding for homogeneity, and will ultimately become an insect-like race of identical beings, all with an IQ of 108, with no geniuses and no innovation, simply maintaining the level of technological innovation that whites brought to them forever.

If the white man disappeared and China remained, you could return in a million years and the only difference in their civilization would be that they look more the same than they do already.

Oh, and the rest of the yellow Asians will have been absorbed by China into a singular hive. Because all “China” ever really was was an Asian social construct for wiping out differences in the Asiatic race. But a million years from now, if we do not push them into something different, they will be using the same cellphones, playing the same terrible MMORPGs, using the same robot factories to ship the same consumer goods.

And doing the same dragon festivals, saying the same thing about how great it is to be Chinese.

It is not the ideal future for a planet that showed such great potential just a hundred years ago.

Furthermore, there is more than simply “the continuation of life” to be considered here. On a fundamental level, I feel that I have a duty to my ancestors to continue on what they created. I know that this concept is considered absolutely ridiculous to the boomer generation (and most of those born from it), but it was the norm before that: people felt as though their parents and grandparents had given them something that they had a duty to pass on to their own children and grandchildren.

I feel that duty. In order to understand why I feel that duty, someone would presumably have to do a psychological test on me. But it exists, and it is heavy on my soul.

In actual fact, if were to indulge myself ever so slightly I would say that I feel very often that I am Leto II, and that I have the burden of all of the generations that came before me whispering to me, demanding that I push forward with the Golden Path. It feels to me that there is a great destiny which wishes to unfold in this universe, but that if men do not fight for it, it can and will be crushed under the weight of evil.

Framing what I do as “hate” is utterly childish and, upon further examination, totally nonsensical.

However, it is much easier to have a discussion on these issues based on the premise that one side is pure evil and simply hates people – and wants to sadistically harm them – because of the color of their skin, while the other side is morally righteous and only wants all people to live in harmony.

If the discussion is framed in terms of one side believing that there is scientific evidence that black and brown-skinned people are less evolved, and thus the outcome of race-mixing in a technological society is going to be utter catastrophe, and another side that simply wants to silence and destroy anyone who questions any of their assumptions, which are forwarded for purely philosophical purposes, then it becomes much more difficult.

That is why James Watson has to be made example of. He has to have his life destroyed so that no one else will dare come out and state the obvious, for fear of retribution. Because they are able to claim that I am a “neo-Nazi white supremacist that hates the color of the skin,” but it is much harder to claim that high-level scientists meet that particular definition.

The Jews will crucify a 90-year-old man without thinking twice about it, right out there in full public view, for believing things that were taken as obvious fact when he was 60 if they believe it is necessary to protect their agenda.

Civnats will never accept that they are completely retarded.

It is still fun to watch them make an ass out of them selves and get bullied by someone that actually knows what they’re talking about.

Here we can see just that with James Allsup debating Arthur Schaper on race realism.

It’s shocking these people will keep coming back for these discussions.

They need to take a page out of antifa’s book and say that their ideas, being religious in nature, are not up for discussion or debate.

In new shocking news, White students not only have equal or fewer advantages than non-Whites, but they also perform better than non-Whites across the board in every school.

Who could have ever predicted this?

This video is not very edgy and perfect for normie consumption, post this to people who may be able to make the push to our group.

The Judenpresse is claiming President Trump and Jeff Sessions are planning to use the Department of Justice to take on the anti-white racial quota system known as “affirmative action.”

Allegedly, they’ve obtained a document that EXPLICITLY STATES they want to end DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WHITES…!

Once upon a time, Ivy League schools placed quotas on Jews to keep their institutions from becoming the self-satirizing clown show they are today and it was called bigotry and a violation of civil rights. At the same time, the Jews who slithered in and took control once the quota system was lifted are now calling it bigotry and a violation of civil rights to oppose doing the exact same thing to America’s dwindling white plurality.

Non-Jewish white people are already highly underrepresented in Ivy League institutions. Even East Asians have their numbers controlled under the quota system (it’s never been explained why they have “white privilege,” but that is the assumed argument). Since Asian parents only care about their kids getting into good schools, Trump could pry their bloc vote away from the Democrats just by intervening on behalf of them and whites here – that is, by removing the system of Affirmative Action and returning to an achievement-based meritocracy.

New York Times:

The Trump administration is preparing to redirect resources of the Justice Department’s civil rights division toward investigating and suing universities over affirmative action admissions policies deemed to discriminate against white applicants, according to a document obtained by The New York Times.

The document, an internal announcement to the civil rights division, seeks current lawyers interested in working for a new project on “investigations and possible litigation related to intentional race-based discrimination in college and university admissions.”

The announcement suggests that the project will be run out of the division’s front office, where the Trump administration’s political appointees work, rather than its Educational Opportunities Section, which is run by career civil servants and normally handles work involving schools and universities.

The document does not explicitly identify whom the Justice Department considers at risk of discrimination because of affirmative action admissions policies. But the phrasing it uses, “intentional race-based discrimination,” cuts to the heart of programs designed to bring more minority students to university campuses.

Supporters and critics of the project said it was clearly targeting admissions programs that can give members of generally disadvantaged groups, like black and Latino students, an edge over other applicants with comparable or higher test scores.

They are “generally disadvantaged” – by their genetics. Not the color of their skin.

This Chinese person:

Has roughly the same (if not more) melanin than this Mexican person:

Yet the former has, statistically, 20-25 IQ points more than the latter.

The discrimination against Asian by the affirmative action admissions programs are a tacit establishment admission that race is not a “social construct,” given that it certainly has nothing to do with “skin color.”

A History of an Anti-White Hoax

The system of Affirmative Action was enacted during the 1960s to give blacks more points on exams and advantages when applying for jobs as a crutch for their IQ handicap.

Most liberals and leftists know deep down inside the average black is naturally a lot dumber than the average white, which is why AA isn’t managed in a way that makes sense – for instance, basing it on household income. But you couldn’t do that, because poor whites score higher on intelligence and academic tests than wealthy blacks.

Note: Psychologists used to classify anyone with an IQ <80 as having a severe mental disability, but they changed it to <70 because the former measure was deemed “racist.” Though the average American black IQ is 83, many fall below 80.

So the argument that is made is that blacks should get institutional privilege because many of them are clinically mentally retarded, but there’s a whole bunch of other groups getting in on this racket too.

For example, why do “Latinos” get affirmative action? Aside from any historical context about “discrimination,” so-called “Latinos” aren’t even a race. While most Spanish-speakers in the US are some kind of Mestizo from Mexico, the ones who benefit the most from Affirmative Action are the smart ones with much higher white admixture (or simply Spanish whites born in Mexico) who get lead in their boxing glove when competing against non-Spanish speaking whites.

Just check out the members of the “Latino Leadership Association” at the Yale School of Management:

So in other words, the program doesn’t even do what it originally aimed to do.

The Jewish narrative about white privilege and institutional racism has yet to catch on with anyone other than wealthy gullible white women, recent immigrant groups who want to cut corners, and really slow nig-nogs like Tariq Nasheed.

They have had five decades to make their point and not only did their programs fail, they are now starting to adversely impact average people’s lives as browning America becomes predictably poorer and poorer.

Trump & Sessions are now targeting non-white college applicants under the guise of reversing Affirmative Action https://t.co/j7HUgXnV4y

— Tariq Nasheed (@tariqnasheed) August 2, 2017

The “white privilege” conspiracy theory is the exact type of Big Lie Adolf Hitler documents the Jews of engaging in in Mein Kampf. To this day, with no sense of irony (why Jews are losing the post-modern culture war), Jews continue to Big Lie by Big Lying about what Hitler said about the Big Lie!

“But it remained for the Jews, with their unqualified capacity for falsehood, and their fighting comrades, the Marxists, to impute responsibility for the downfall precisely to the man who alone had shown a superhuman will and energy in his effort to prevent the catastrophe which he had foreseen and to save the nation from that hour of complete overthrow and shame. By placing responsibility for the loss of the world war on the shoulders of Ludendorff they took away the weapon of moral right from the only adversary dangerous enough to be likely to succeed in bringing the betrayers of the Fatherland to Justice.

All this was inspired by the principle—which is quite true within itself—that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods.

It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.” – Mein Kampf. Vol I, ch. X

But the Goyim know, so they can big lie no mo’.

Andrew Anglin contributed to this report.