Wow finally China banned a filthy Hollywood movie.

But for a completely stupid reason.

Hollywood Reporter:

Sources tell The Hollywood Reporter that Bruce Lee’s daughter made a direct appeal to China’s National Film Administration for changes to her father’s controversial portrayal in the film. Now, the movie’s China backer Bona Film Group is said to be frantically working with Tarantino on a new cut to salvage the release.

The critically acclaimed movie, starring Leonardo DiCaprio and Brad Pitt, had been approved for release in China on Oct. 25, but regulators have abruptly reversed course.

According to multiple sources close to the situation in Beijing, who asked not to be named because they weren’t permitted to speak publicly about the matter, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood’s local release has been indefinitely put on hold.

The film would have been Tarantino’s first proper release in China, and the country’s enormous market was expected to help push the title’s worldwide box office total past the $400 million mark (it has earned $366 million to date). The abrupt change-up comes as a blow to both Sony Pictures and the film’s Chinese financier, Beijing-based Bona Film Group.

As is typical in China, no official explanation for the cancellation has been offered by Beijing regulators. Bona didn’t reply to text messages and emails, and Sony’s China office could not immediately be reached.

But the story swirling through the executive ranks of China’s film industry Friday was that the decision stemmed from Tarantino’s somewhat controversial portrayal of martial arts hero Bruce Lee, the only character of Chinese descent in the movie. Friends and family of the late Lee have blasted the director for the depiction, saying the real-life action star didn’t behave as he’s portrayed in the film.

According to sources close to Bona and China’s Film Bureau, Bruce Lee’s daughter, Shannon Lee, made a direct appeal to China’s National Film Administration, asking that it demand changes to her father’s portrayal.

Played by Mike Moh, the Lee in Sony’s Once Upon a Time in Hollywood is wildly cocky and claims he could have “crippled” Muhammad Ali in a fight (referred to as Cassius Clay). Pitt’s character, a stuntman and former war hero named Cliff Booth, laughs in Lee’s face over the comment and then the two get into a “friendly” contest of who can knock the other down three times without hitting the face. The scuffle ends before either side wins, but Pitt appears to have an edge near the end, after throwing Lee into the side of a classic car. 

So here’s the thing.

Brad Pitt and the character that he plays are way bigger than Bruce Lee, who was like 130 pounds at his peak and 5 feet 8 inches. So, all things being equal, the bigger, more muscular Western guy would dominate in a fight.

Related: Chuck Norris: I Was a Fighter For Years, Bruce Lee Never Competed or Fought Professionally

This isn’t even a political question, more like something out of a drunk conversation between you and your normie buddies: “Hey man, who would win in a fight: Abraham Lincoln or Juni from Spy Kids all grown-up? N-n-no, I’m serious, answer me – quit laughing, asshole!”

And I dislike Quentin Tarantino as much as the next guy, but my first thought is that this should not be a controversial thing. That being said, I have noticed a sort of mission creep or perhaps more accurately, a “celebrity creep” status that Bruce Lee has enjoyed since his death after which he became some sort of cultural idol and voodoo shaman figure.

Every Asian since Bruce Lee has basically striven to be a Bruce Lee copy.

The Daily Stormer is a Chinese shill website.

But even we must admit: probably, this scene in the Quentin Tarantino movie was not meant to be explicitly anti-Chinese. Or for that matter, even anti-Bruce Lee.

That being said: why is there even a question in China about banning any Quentin Tarantino movie?

This man is degenerate and obscene, and he lowers the morale and the morality of any society in which he is allowed to operate.

We are strong supporters of free speech here on this site, but much of Quentin Tarantino’s material borders on the obscene and the pornographic. And it is certainly debatable whether it would even pass the Miller Test in America.

But in a country like China, where they strictly defend moral family values from Jewish perversion, why was there ever even a question about banning this film?

China – and even more so, Russia – need to wake up to the fact that news media propaganda is not the way Jews suck their people in.

That is done through entertainment media.

That is the carrier of the virus of liberalism in the same way that rats were the carriers of the plague.

This is yet another reason you cannot have Jews. They’re all disgusting rape-pigs.

Lena Dunham is simply the female Harvey Weinstein. But she can get away with a public rape, because she’s a female.

Page Six:

Lena Dunham has said she flirted with co-star Brad Pitt on the set of Quentin Tarantino’s “Once Upon a Time in . . . Hollywood” — but the “Girls” creator took things to the next level at the film’s London premiere.

When the cast lined up on the red carpet, Dunham was separated from Pitt by Tarantino and stars Leo DiCaprio and Margot Robbie.

But she made her way to Pitt and went in for a kiss on the lips.

She caught about half his mouth.

In the movie, she plays a Charles Manson follower.

Look at Leo’s face during the rape incident.

The human female Margot Robbie wants him to intervene and save Brad from the creature, but Leo knows that you can never interfere with the rape behavior of God’s Chosen Ones.

Leo knows that it’s like that Thin Lizzy song where he says “if the boys wanna fight, you better let em,” except it’s “if the Chosen Ones wanna rape, you better let em.”

The bulbous Jew Dunham has a history of being involved publicly with Jewish rape behavior. She has defended a Jewish writer for her show “Girls,” who allegedly drugged and raped a 17-year-old girl, and she has talked about sexually abusing her own sister.

As Kevin Williamson wrote in a 2014 review of her book “Not That Kind of Girl” in National Review:

Dunham writes of casually masturbating while in bed next to her younger sister, of bribing her with “three pieces of candy if I could kiss her on the lips for five seconds . . . anything a sexual predator might do to woo a small suburban girl I was trying.” At one point, when her sister is a toddler, Lena Dunham pries open her vagina — “my curiosity got the best of me,” she offers, as though that were an explanation. “This was within the spectrum of things I did.”

…

The episode with her sister’s vaginal pebbles seems to be especially suspicious. When Dunham inspects her sister’s business, she shrieks at what she sees: “Grace had stuffed six or seven pebbles in there. . . . Grace cackled, thrilled that her prank had been such a success.” Dunham’s writing often is unclear (willfully so, it seems), but the context here — Grace has overheard her older sister asking whether her baby sister has a uterus — and Grace’s satisfaction with her prank suggest that Grace was expecting her older sister to go poking around in her genitals and inserted the pebbles in expectation of it. Grace is around one year old at the time of these events. There is no non-horrific interpretation of this episode. As for stroking her mother’s vagina, having mistaken it for her hairless cat . . .

That particular scene might seem unbelievable to goyim, but this is actually just normal Jewish family relations.

The abjectly repulsive kike Dunham has previously bragged about sexually harassing Brad Pitt.

The man is going to need therapy.

This large pig-beast is monumentally disgusting. She is the prime form of the Jew female, like Weinstein is the prime form of the Jew male.

She is so unfathomably nasty that it is difficult to comprehend the fact that she actually exists.

Having this woman kiss you is worse than having someone rub literal shit all over your face.

Seriously, we probably need to start a GoFundMe for Brad Pitt.

Also, I didn’t know this sick sow was in this movie.

And here I was thinking of actually going to see it. I don’t like Quentin Tarantino, and think he is a hack, but the idea that he is trying to do a grown-up movie interested me.

Furthermore, I thought there might be anti-Semitic messages in it, which I would have a fun time picking up on. Quentin Tarantino is an autistic foot-fetishist (like all of my favorite Twitter personalities) who has worked in Hollywood his whole life, so he must be an anti-Semite on some level.

So I was going to see it.

But I will not subject myself to looking at the monstrous mutant slug. No way, no how.

It’s funny: all Tarantino’s movies were produced by Harvey Weinstein before this one (another reason I thought this one might be better). But with the male Harvey Weinstein out, the female Harvey Weinstein comes in.

Another funny thing: Brad Pitt was one of the only people in Hollywood who was recorded as having stood up to Weinstein. And it wasn’t him that said it – his ex-girlfriend, Gwyneth Paltrow, said he threatened to kill the fat kike.

No doubt the Lena Dunham kiss-rape was her taking revenge on the goy – not only violating his body and soiling his human soul, but doing so in public, so the whole world will know his shame.

Just imagine that we are ruled over not by badass evil supervillain overlords like the Jews say the Nazis were.

There is something more noble about being ruled over by hardcore badass evil overlords. At the very least, you keep your honor. Being ruled over by the strong is in keeping with the natural order, even if they’re evil.

But no.

We are ruled over by vile mutated-pig rape-demons.

In an interview with Scott Feinberg of Entertainment Weekly, Black actor Samuel L. Jackson explained that he felt bad for Moslems and wished Whites had done San Bernardino.

Jackson says he empathizes with innocent Muslim-Americans who have fallen under the veil of suspicion because a few other people who share their religion have committed atrocities against their countrymen: “When that thing happened in France, we were sitting there going, ‘Oh, my God, these terrorists!’ And I can’t even tell you how much that day the thing that happened in San Bernardino — I was in Hawaii — how much I really wanted that to just be another, you know, crazy white dude, and not really some Muslims, because it’s like: ‘Oh, shit. It’s here. And it’s here in another kind of way.’ Now, okay, it happened on an Army base and it happened somewhere else. But now? It’s like they have a legitimate reason now to look at your Muslim neighbor, friend, whatever in another way. And they become the new young black men.”

The Jewish interviewer pushes the idea that Jackson is a moral compass for America, with a lot to contribute to the discussion of how to best serve Blacks.

The Black moral compass, who engaged in a forced interracial gay blow job in the recently released Quintin Tarantino film The Hateful Eight, explained that Donald Trump is driven by hate and that he will be voting for Hillary.

Is it any wonder so many people opposed giving Blacks the right to vote?

Jackson also spoke out against the cops, saying there needs to be a new government agency to police the police. Maybe he should be made the head of it? He can force racist White cops to give him blow jobs. That’ll get these racists back in line right quick.