The British are banning both Russians and Chinese from paying respects to the Queen.

Kinda weird.

I’d go so far as to say it’s tacky.

Insider:

A Russian official said the UK’s decision not to invite Russia to Queen Elizabeth’s funeral was “deeply immoral.”

Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova said UK officials cited the war in Ukraine.

A UK official told CNN that representatives from Belarus and Myanmar would also not be invited.

Belarus, Myanmar, and… China.

BBC:

A Chinese government delegation has been banned from attending the lying-in-state of Queen Elizabeth II, the BBC understands.

House of Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle is understood to have refused a request for access to Westminster Hall over Chinese sanctions against five MPs and two peers.

Queen Elizabeth will lie in state until her funeral on Monday.

The Speaker’s office told the BBC it did not comment on security matters.

A Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson said they had not seen a reports about the ban, which first emerged on the Politico website.

“As a host, the UK is certainly familiar with diplomatic protocols and proper manners of receiving guests,” China’s foreign ministry spokesperson, Mao Ning, said.

Last year, China imposed travel bans and asset freezes on nine Britons – including seven parliamentarians – for accusing Beijing of mistreating Uighur Muslims.

So, it’s a security matter?

Huh.

The Queen was celebrated for being totally apolitical. A lot of right-wingers took issue with that. I’ve defended her.

But it is very ironic that the UK government would politicize her funeral.

Is nothing sacred?

I’ve seen a lot of people attacking the Queen because she oversaw the end of the British empire. I think there is probably something to say about that, actually – but it doesn’t even matter at all. Maybe the Queen could have been political, and maybe her being political would have been a good thing, but she wasn’t political.

Furthermore, the monarchy had been chained up since Oliver Cromwell, and the actual amount of power they had was questionable. Cromwell proved that the parliament can just kill the monarch, and that was something they had to keep in mind. The crown probably wanted to side with Adolf Hitler, and they couldn’t make that happen.

But it doesn’t even matter either way. It’s literally irrelevant. The Queen, whoever she was as a person, remains a symbol of the British and of white people in general – a symbol of our previous glory. The blacks and Jews attacking her view her as a symbol, so we pretty much have to take that at face value.

I’m sure as hell not standing with these blacks and Jews attacking the Queen – that is disgusting to me. I’m never standing with the Jews on anything, as I’ve repeatedly explained – yes, I will stake positions based on not agreeing with Jews, and I don’t apologize for that.

Yes, there are conversations to be had about what the Queen could or couldn’t have done, what she did or did do, and what she did secretly or semi-secretly. I think it’s fine to have that conversation. But you don’t go out and condemn her after she died, standing with these undesirables. That is plainly gross.

I condemn every right-wing figure who is taking the opportunity of her death to attack her, and I condemn anyone hoping King Charles will fail. I think likely King Charles will fail. I don’t think he has the strength to stand up against these screeching mulatto females calling for an end to the monarchy. But we should all be hoping and praying that he preserves the throne.

Things are not always going to be this bad. Eventually, things are going to get better. When things get better, it would be good to have the monarchy in tact, as a link between the present and the past. It would give the British, and white people generally, the moral authority to build a new political and social order. We can get that moral authority from something else, but there is no reason not to have the monarchy.

Prince William could be a based King.

He would play the same role in a right-wing society that Elizabeth played in a leftist society – he would just stand back and not ever say anything political, while providing moral authority to the nation.

Charles doesn’t look especially healthy, so we’re probably looking at a situation where William will take over around the time things start to shift back to the right, and we begin to physically remove some of these people from our country. This would be much better than a situation where Charles goes along with allowing these Jews and their pets to abolish the monarchy.

Tucker Carlson rode hard on Thursday night following the death of Queen Elizabeth.

He straight-up said that colonialism is good, and that Indian civilization would be nothing if it wasn’t for the British.

Even I was like, “wow, this dude is hardcore.”

It’s at the beginning of the above video. I can recommend it significantly.

But it’s just true – this anti-colonialism stuff is retarded and in light of what the US and UN are doing, it is just nonsensical. The UN has gone around the third world and forced people to take the deadly vax, forced them to close their countries down. The US is trying to force everyone in the third world to have gay sex and put women in charge of everything. They also support Islamic terrorists.

The British empire never did any of that. All they did was bring Christianity and try to teach the savages to read and act human.

Basically, the Jews are forcing this idea that Queen Elizabeth is a representative of the British Empire, and I think people should just embrace that and say “yeah, she was – and the British Empire was good.”

That’s what Tucker did and he did it perfectly. It’s also why these right-wingers whining about the Queen disgust me so throughly. She was just some high-born woman who didn’t really do anything other than look and talk regal. Attacking her as a person is just goofy. She wasn’t a person, she was a symbol. That’s how the left views her, and that’s how we should view her.

Queen Elizabeth has died.

She was 96, so it’s not exactly a huge surprise.

It is strange that it happened exactly a week after Joe Biden gave a speech declaring himself dictator. It also happened the same week the psycho woman took over as Prime Minister and declared the first government with no white men. I don’t think these things are connected literally, but it seems they are likely connected spiritually in some way.

Queen Elizabeth’s coronation was in 1952, so she has been a symbol of multiple ages of England, and was sort of a connection to the past in some way. She took over when England was still white.

Apparently, Prince Charles is now King, and he will quite likely participate in some move to abolish the monarchy. I would be surprised if it doesn’t go in that direction.

It’s kinda sad.

Presumably, she’s agreed to the payoff as well, in order to keep Meghan from going to the press and accusing her and the rest of the royal family of being virulent skin-haters.

AFP:

Queen Elizabeth on Monday allowed her grandson Prince Harry and his wife Meghan to split their time between Canada and Britain during a “transition period” in which the family will figure out how to deal with their shock resignation from front-line royal duties.

The monarch said she held “very constructive” talks between Harry and his older brother Prince William and their father Prince Charles aimed at charting a course through the fallout of the bombshell announcement.

Meghan reportedly joined the conversation by phone from Canada after abruptly jetting out of Britain last week.

Their effective resignation on Wednesday followed a year filled with rumours of infighting between the brothers and reports of Meghan a biracial American actress with a strong social media presence – feeling unwelcome in the highly traditional and structured royal family.

“My family and I are entirely supportive of Harry and Meghan’s desire to create a new life as a young family,” the 93-year-old queen said in a statement after the first day of meetings at her Sandringham estate in eastern England.

Harry and Meghan said they wanted to “carve out a progressive new role within this institution” – a statement that some read as a slight at the way the royal family has been run under Britain’s beloved monarch.

The queen frankly admitted that Harry and Meghan’s decision was not welcome news.

“Although we would have preferred them to remain full-time working members of the royal family, we respect and understand their wish to live a more independent life as a family while remaining a valued part of my family,” she said.

Yeah, I think that’s the same answer America would give if black people decided to leave us.

“Although we really love black people and appreciate the contribution they’ve made to our society, we support them going back to Africa.”

The Queen was born in 1926.

This map of the British Empire was printed in 1926:

I really can’t imagine she thought much of Harry deciding to marry an African.

Queen Elizabeth is literally 93 years old. She’s probably just not even there anymore. They told her over tea, “spot of bother with Prince Andrew, luv.” To which she replied, “Andy? Lil’ Randy Pandy Andy? He’s a good lad, no need to be mean.”

She then rode her horse into the sunset.

Daily Mail:

The Queen and other senior royals have told Prince Andrew they ‘back and believe’ him ‘100 per cent’ after his calamitous interview with the BBC.

The Duke of York is said to have received his mother’s private support over the Newsnight interview on Saturday, but she will not be publicly commenting on it, a Palace insider told the London Evening Standard.

It follows Andrew facing a barrage of criticism after speaking out about his friend Jeffrey Epstein and claims he had sex with his ‘slave’ Virginia Roberts three times.

Andrew has also been reassured that his duties will not be slashed back after he was urged to ‘take a break’ for the sake of others including his brother Prince Charles, whose trip to New Zealand was overshadowed as it started today.

Today, the Queen appeared sombre as she was photographed riding in the grounds of Windsor Castle accompanied by her Head Groom Terry Pendry.

Hmm.

If this 93-year-old can ride a horse, she can surely watch Prince Andrew’s disastrous TV interview.

I guess that means she’s in on it. I think there are some questions regarding the Royal Family that deserve answering:

• Why did Prince Harry – who dated blondes before – suddenly decide to sire the future Mulatto King of Africa with an ugly American divorcee plagued by scandal?

• What was the nature of the Prince Charles’ special relationship with Jeremy Savile (known pedophile ring operator), and why did they stay so chummy with him until his death?

• Why did prominent people in Princess Diana’s life allege that she had been killed off by MI6 immediately after her famous road death?

• Why was Prince Andrew so chummy with Jeffrey Epstein (known pedophile ring operator and Mossad agent)?

• Prince Charles’ uncle, Lord Mountbatten, was a prominent pedophile. This is according to information gathered by the FBI. Are they ever going to address this?

The people want to know what’s going on here.

Don’t the people have a right to not be ruled over by weirdos and pedos? What kind of bizarre regime is this? The Royal Family is supposed to be a taxpayer-subsidized PR troupe for the UK, but instead we find out that they’re a bunch of disgusting cretins that engage in pederasty, murder and zoophilia.

By my reckoning that means they need to be fired ASAP.

For such an expensive PR team, they sure are making Pedo Island look bad.