How is it possible that there are still hidden passages in the pyramids?

Haven’t they been using ground penetrating radar on these things for decades?

Reuters:

A hidden corridor nine metres (30 feet) long has been discovered close to the main entrance of the 4,500-year-old Great Pyramid of Giza, and this could lead to further findings, Egyptian antiquities officials said on Thursday.

The discovery within the pyramid, the last of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World still standing, was made under the Scan Pyramids project that since 2015 has been using non-invasive technology including infrared thermography, 3D simulations and endoscopes to peer inside the structure.

The Great Pyramid was constructed as a monumental tomb around 2560 BC during the reign of the Pharaoh Khufu, or Cheops. Built to a height of 146 metres (479 feet), it was the tallest structure made by humans until the Eiffel Tower in Paris in 1889.

The unfinished corridor was likely created to redistribute the pyramid’s weight around either the main entrance, almost 7 metres away, or on another as yet undiscovered chamber or space, said Mostafa Waziri, head of Egypt’s Supreme Council of Antiquities.

…

In 2017, Scan Pyramids researchers announced the discovery of a void at least 30 metres long inside the Great Pyramid, the first major inner structure found since the 19th century

It’s certainly interesting, though I’m not sure I know what the implications are.

Does it mean that documentary I like was right?

Because yeah what about the water marks on the sphinx?

I mean, no one explained that, ever.

A genome study on the Egyptian pharaohs show that they were genetically closer to White Europeans and not the Egyptians of today. This means that White people led the efforts to build the pyramids.

So much for the “We Wuz Kangz” theory. Turns out that the ancient Egyptians were genetically closer to modern day Europeans. This finding comes from a new genetic study conducted on the pharaohs.

This has angered one so-called Egyptologist. The alleged Egyptologist seems to think that the findings are racist because it shows that there is no real genetic link between present day Egyptians and the people who built the ancient wonders the nation is known for.

The Independent:

Scientists who managed to obtain full genome sequences of Ancient Egyptians for the first time have concluded the people of the pharaohs were more closely related to modern Europeans and inhabitants of the Near East rather than present-day Egyptians.

But the claims sparked suspicion from one leading Egyptologist, who questioned whether genetic analysis could justify such a sweeping statement and pointed to a long history of spurious attempts to separate ancient Egyptians from the modern-day population.

The mummies were taken from a single archaeological site on the River Nile, Abusir el-Meleq, which was inhabited from 3,250BC to 700AD and was home to a cult of Osiris, the god of the dead, making it a good place to be buried.

A complete genome sequence was obtained for three mummies and mitochondrial DNA, which is passed through the female line, was obtained from 90 individuals. They were dated to between about 1,400BC and 400AD.

The researchers, writing in the journal Nature Communications, admitted their sample “may not be representative for all of ancient Egypt”.

Nevertheless, they concluded the mummified people were “distinct from modern Egyptians, and closer towards Near Eastern and European samples”.

It was always absurd to believe that a bunch of mud monkeys and Blacks created the pyramids. Look at places with large Black populations. These areas are third world disaster zones. There was no way they could have organized such an effort. Common sense dictates this.

In the 19th century, Samuel George Morton wrote a number of books concluding that the ancient Egyptians were of European racial stock. He came to this conclusion after analyzing a large number of ancient Egyptian skulls.

Whites undoubtedly built most of the ancient structures throughout the Middle East. This study just gives us more evidence proving it.