pussy hat march – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com Daily Stormer Historical Archive Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.17 https://www.anglinarchive.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/cropped-favicon-32x32.png pussy hat march – DS https://www.anglinarchive.com 32 32 Wenches Protest in Ireland After Rape Legalized by Judicial Precedent: “Dressed Like a Slut, Clearly Asking for It” https://www.anglinarchive.com/2018/11/16/wenches-protest-in-ireland-after-rape-legalized-by-judicial-precedent-dressed-like-a-slut-clearly-asking-for-it/ Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0000 Luis Castillo
Daily Stormer
November 16, 2018

A bunch of ugly, used up slags with short dyed hair and problem glasses have taken to the streets of Ireland to protest the recent legalization of rape through judicial precedent.

Their argument appears to be that sexy underwear does not indicate sexual intent.

Someone should really tell that to Victoria’s Secret – they’ve built an entire business around sexy underwear that signals sexual intent.

If a thong isn’t supposed to signal sexual availability, then these thong merchants owe a lot of women their men’s money back.

Washington Post:

A 17-year-old woman from Ireland says she was raped by a 27-year-old man she met out at a club. She said he dragged her through the mud and then had sex with her even after she asked him to stop. A witness said he saw the pair on the ground, and that the man had his hand on the victim’s throat. After the incident, the woman said, she told the man, “you just raped me.”

“No,” the defendant said he replied. “We just has sex.”

He painted a much different picture of the evening, saying that the pair had kissed and then gone outside to lie down in a muddy area nearby, at which point they had consensual sex. (No witnesses confirmed that the pair had kissed.)

The woman pressed charges, and the case went to trial. Both sides framed it as a question of consent.

“You have heard her say she did not consent. You have heard him say she did consent,” Tom Creed, a lawyer for the plaintiff, told the jury. ” If you are satisfied she did not consent and that he knew she did not consent, then you convict. She is quite clear she did not consent. She said she never had sexual intercourse before.”

Indeed – she was out at a club in lacy underwear because of what a virgin she was.

I’ll pass, thanks.

But the defendant’s lawyer took a different tact, suggesting that the teenager was lying. As evidence, she pointed to how the plaintiff dressed.

During the trial, defense attorney Elizabeth O’Connell held up a pair of thong underwear similar to what the 17-year-old was wearing the night she alleges she was assaulted.

“Does the evidence out-rule the possibility that she was attracted to the defendant and was open to meeting someone and being with someone? You have to look at the way she was dressed,” O’Connell said. “She was wearing a thong with a lace front.”

A jury of eight men and four women later found the defendant not guilty.

The lawyer’s comment drew immediate condemnation from women’s rights advocates. The Dublin Rape Crisis Centre suggested that lawyers should be banned from remarking on victims’ dress in the future.

“These kind of mythologies and stereotypes around rape come up again and again in court cases, because the defense to rape is that the sex was consensual,” Rape Crisis Centre chief executive Noeline Blackwell told the Irish Independent. “So anything the defendant can do to suggest there was consent will be used.”

Yeah, here are some things a woman can do to suggest consent:

  • Dress like a slut
  • Go partying in clubs
  • Hang out in muddy fields with men she meets in clubs

But they’re all up in arms about it anyway.

Nothing quite says “take women seriously” like flooding twitter with pictures of women’s underwear.

Classy…

The thong definitely says “rape me.” The lacy one gives more of a “I consent, so it’s not rape” vibe. Maybe I should write a guide to women’s underwear?

Would that make these slags shut up?

No, they’re clearly determined to go on forever about their underwear.

I think it’s great and all that the Irish have legalized the rape of women in slutty outfits, but they need to start restricting their right to wave around their underwear, post it on social media. Generally speaking, the fact that they can speak in public is an embarrassment for the West, both on the world stage and in the eyes of history.

They never show up to protest if a meth addict breaks into a house, beats a woman to a pulp and rapes her in her bed. They only protest when men are not thrown in jail based on accusations of rape due to lack of solid evidence, as in this case.

They do not show up to protest real rape when it happens.

They are protesting the presumption of innocence – with slutty underwear.

]]> Legalizing Rape is Fundamentally Good for America https://www.anglinarchive.com/2018/10/14/legalizing-rape-is-fundamentally-good-for-america/ Sun, 14 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0000 Lee Rogers
Daily Stormer
October 14, 2018

Womyn everywhere around America are demanding to be raped. Unfortunately, antiquated and outdated laws prohibiting rape are depriving womyn of their freedoms.

One of the best things to come out of the Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court confirmation circus was that it has allowed us to finally have an honest intellectual conversation about rape. Clearly, anti-rape laws have been a disaster for this country. It has been particularly tough on independent womyn who desire to be raped but have no access to a healthy supply of male rapists.

This greatly unfortunate situation has caused many womyn to take out their rage on innocent men by falsely accusing them of rape when no such rape occurred. They’ve even gone so far as to support political agendas that bring third world savages into the country who are more likely to rape them. In extreme cases, the lack of rapists have resulted in various forms of mental illness causing some to seduce underage teenage boys for the purpose of their own sexual gratification. There is no question that anti-rape laws have been nothing short of a societal and cultural disaster for America.

Some will claim that the many females we saw protesting Kavanaugh were expressing an anti-rape view. This is not a proper interpretation of the situation. These protesters were actually expressing their desire to be raped.

Womyn are not logical creatures so it is impossible to accept much of what they say at face value. These anti-rape protests were them trying to draw attention to themselves in the hopes that a group of men would kidnap and rape them. In fact, they appeared to be projecting their rape fantasies on to Kavanaugh in the hopes that he would be the one doing the raping.

This same type of phenomenon occurred with the pussy hat marches against Donald Trump. These womyn claimed to be protesting Trump’s statements about how easy it is to grab womyn by the pussy if you’re a star. In reality, these womyn were only protesting Trump in the hopes that he would personally grab them by the pussy.

Another problem these womyn have is that most of them are ugly, old or fat. In the most extreme cases, they are ugly, old and fat. Your average man is not going to risk many years in jail to rape womyn who are ugly, old or fat let alone any combination of the three. Not even desperate incels are willing to take such a risk.

Anti-rape laws also represent an outdated symbol of the patriarchy which has been fully torn down thanks to the wisdom of Jews and independent womyn. These laws only make sense if womyn are declared the property of men by the state. Since womyn have been given autonomy, there is no longer a purpose for the laws. Anti-rape laws deprive womyn of liberty and the right to pursue happiness which is guaranteed to them under the United States Constitution.

It’s also worth noting that one goal of feminism has been to give womyn the freedom to be raped. Camille Paglia, a contrarian feminist but still a feminist, once explained how 1960s second-wave feminism helped increase the chances of womyn being raped. In other words, you can’t be a real feminist unless you support rape legalization.

At this point in time, there is no logical reason to keep these outdated anti-rape laws on the books. Even the anti-rape extremists at the Southern Poverty Law Center could not cite a single reason to justify the continuation of these stifling anti-rape laws. They published a rambling and incoherent article criticizing the Daily Stormer’s principled rape legalization position, but based their absurd opinion entirely off of emotion and hysterics.

We simply can’t have a situation where womyn are disrupting the functions of our society due to a lack of rapists. Legalizing rape will provide these womyn with a larger supply of rapists and end this bizarre phenomenon of men being falsely accused of a crime that shouldn’t be considered a crime in the first place.

The good news is that we are finally starting to see bi-partisan support for abolishing anti-rape laws. Even feminists are backing boomer aged leftist men who are publicly declaring their right to rape.

The bottom line is that legalizing rape is fundamentally good for America. Not only should rape be legal in all 50 of these United States, but the federal government should encourage its practice to the fullest.

]]>