This is absurd.

I would have trolled for Andrew for free.

Virginia Roberts is the actual scum of the earth, and is nothing more than a disgruntled employee of Jew Mossad Agent Jeffrey Epstein. Prince Andrew is literally a victim of all of these people, and he isn’t even accused of an illegal crime.

Daily Mail:

The Duke and Duchess of York’s closest advisers sought help from an online troll in an attempt to discredit the Duke’s sex accuser, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.

The aides hoped that Molly Skye Brown – who attacked Virginia Roberts on Twitter for months – possessed information that might prove the infamous photograph of Andrew with his arm around Ms Roberts, then 17, was manipulated.

Ms Roberts, one of the victims of billionaire Jeffrey Epstein, claims she was forced to have sex with the Duke, now 60, on three occasions, allegations he vehemently denies along with any other wrongdoing.

In a bizarre conversation, one of the Duke’s team is alleged to have discussed with Ms Brown the possibility of setting up a fake Twitter account to ensnare a woman they suspected of doctoring the photo.

Ms Roberts maintains the picture was taken on the night she claims she had sex with Andrew in 2001.

For months Ms Brown, 42, a former teen beauty queen from Florida, has subjected Ms Roberts to vile abuse on Twitter.

Yet Sarah Ferguson’s trusted lieutenant Antonia Marshall – having seen a tweet from Ms Brown stating that the photo was a fake – sent her an email on December 14 asking for a chat and thanking her for her ‘online support’.

When they spoke, Ms Brown claims Ms Marshall suggested a meeting with the Duchess as an apparent sweetener and said she could pass on a greeting to the Queen ‘as we are all one big family and see each other all the time’.

At one stage, Mark Gallagher, the Duke’s PR expert and crisis management specialist, was also drafted in to help woo Ms Brown.

Ms Brown says she provided what she claims was ‘some evidence the photo was doctored’ but declined to help further. She then passed the email and text exchanges to the FBI.

In response to the outcry over Ms Roberts’s claims, the Queen’s second son was forced to give up Royal duties and step down from his charitable patronages. With the US authorities still hopeful of interviewing him about the Epstein scandal, his team of advisers is working behind the scenes to try to restore his reputation.

What made Ms Brown turn against Ms Roberts, who is married and called Virginia Giuffre, is unclear.

Ms Brown claims Ghislaine Maxwell tried to recruit her as a masseuse when she was 14 and exercising at a children’s gym in Palm Beach, Florida, close to Epstein’s mansion.

Ms Maxwell, 58, is on remand in the US after being charged with the sex trafficking of underage girls and the enticement of minors. She has denied any wrongdoing.

Ms Brown’s story emerged last October. Since then she has campaigned to bring paedophiles to justice but claims Ms Roberts was an ‘enabler’ for the sex abuser.

Ms Roberts has publicly denied Ms Brown’s allegations and said she ‘blocked her [on Twitter] because of her widespread lies’.

The extraordinary overtures to Ms Brown from the Duke’s team began with an email from Ms Marshall saying; ‘Hi Molly, I work for the Duchess of York and I wondered if you had time at some point for a quick chat re your tweet about the photo of the Duke being edited/doctored. Thank you so much for your online support!’

The pair exchanged WhatsApp messages and emails before having a lengthy conversation, in which Ms Brown relayed her claims about the photo.

Her doubts do not have the support of experts. Hany Farid, professor of digital forensics and image analysis at University of California, Berkeley, has said: ‘I don’t see any obvious signs of manipulation.’

Even Ms Brown, who maintains the image was ‘Photoshopped’, believes the advisers’ attempts to court her were ‘desperate’.

Indeed, the conversation reportedly took an even more desperate turn, with Ms Marshall discussing the possibility of setting up a ‘spy’ Twitter account to extract information from Epstein’s victims.

Ms Brown said: ‘Then she [Marshall] said “How are you getting all this information?”. And I said “Oh, I made a spy account.” She thought that was brilliant and said ‘Do you think we should get a spy account?’

It is understood Ms Marshall does not have the same ‘recollection’ of the conversation with Ms Brown.

Afterwards, Ms Marshall sent a message saying: ‘One of the York family advisers called Mark Gallagher would love to speak to you.’

Within hours, he had messaged her on WhatsApp. Ms Brown asked the Prince’s aide to brief her on ‘what exactly we will be focusing on for our chat,’ adding: ‘As you know this is much bigger and darker than just a photo scandal. Agreed?’

Mr Gallagher replied: ‘Entirely agreed, Molly. I’d like to talk to you in the round about the important distinction you have drawn between survivors and – in effect – enablers. That gets to the heart of this.’

The Mail on Sunday yesterday put a series of questions to the Duke’s representatives about their conduct in approaching Ms Brown but they declined to comment.

A source close to the Prince said: ‘The exchange with Molly Skye Brown was not out of the ordinary. It would be very easy to over interpret the subsequent conversations.

‘The plain fact of the matter is none of this went further than an initial discussion.’

What grounds does the Daily Mail even have for referring to this woman as a troll? Just because she doesn’t like Virginia Roberts? And the Daily Mail is – for whatever reason – obsessed with putting Prince Andrew at the center of this Epstein scandal, despite the fact that he literally did nothing wrong?

What is the age of consent in the Virgin Islands?

Okay, actually, I just searched that and the Virgin Islands is – ironically – one of the only places in the world where the age of consent is 18. Meaning that yes, Prince Andrew is allegedly guilty of rape in the second degree in the Virgin Islands.

But look: this is a gigantic Jewish spy ring that has been publicly uncovered. It’s not some stupid Daily Mail sex gossip. We should be talking about what the purpose of this man, Jeffrey Epstein, and this woman, Ghislaine Maxwell, going around and convincing all of these famous people to have sex with under age girls, presumably on video.

We should not be talking about stupid lurid sex nonsense.

But yeah – frankly, Prince Andrew is a dopey moron. Who contacts random people on the internet and asks them to help them troll people accusing them of crimes in such a retarded way? The woman was already attacking Virginia Roberts, so the logical thing to do – instead of sending in the official PR team – would be to contact her with a sock, with a well-constructed backstory, and gain her trust, and then start to get her to push what they wanted pushed.

However, pushing that the image was fake was a stupid plan of action in the first place. The picture obviously isn’t fake, and that is a stupid angle. There are plenty of ways to deal with this situation other than that.

It’s just incredible that I am sitting here living in squalor on this website when I could be running the PR team of the British Royal Family. I promise you, I could have gotten Andrew out of this. The basic concept of discrediting Roberts was obviously correct, but this was never about social media – it was about British tabloids, which were driving social media. Getting some random bitch that hates Roberts to talk shit about her is not useless, but the fact that he literally sent his PR team to directly contact the bitch this way is absolutely unbelievable.

Roberts needed to be dragged through the mud. She needed to be painted as an Epstein employee and an Epstein enabler who was just suing everyone and trying to get money (which is actually true, and wouldn’t have been hard to sell).

Andrew’s line should have been: “Yes, she approached me in a very provocative way, sometime during when that picture was taken, but I brushed aside her approaches. Roberts struck me as a highly suspect character, as she appeared to be a ringleader of sorts, working very closely with Ms. Maxwell to manage a group of girls, many of whom seemed younger than she. The whole thing left a sour taste in my mouth, and I broke off my relationship with Mr. Epstein shortly thereafter.”

Then come in with the army of girls accusing Roberts of being the second in command to Maxwell in running the jailbait harem.

The media would have eaten that up.

Instead, he went out there and said he lost his ability to sweat and the photo was shopped. What was even the end game? Why was Andrew not coached before that horrible interview that ruined his life?

Who hires people like this to manage their PR? Apparently, virtually everyone does, because this is just the quality of people in the PR and crisis management scene.

Friends, I could be running a crisis management and PR empire, instead of wallowing in squalor, trying to find discount socks.

Please, understand what I’ve sacrificed, and send me monero.

Of course she is a prostitute.

RT:

Prince Andrew’s chief accuser was a prostitute who lied about her age and was paid “half a million” by disgraced businessman Jeffrey Epstein, new court papers allege, according to the Telegraph.

Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who is now an advocate for victims of sex trafficking, has claimed she had sex with the royal at least three times in 2001, when she was 17.

Giuffre claims this happened after she met with American financier Jeffrey Epstein, who was charged with procuring underage and young women for powerful clients, together with his close associate Ghislaine Maxwell.

According to the report, Sharon Churcher, the journalist who first revealed that Giuffre was among Epstein’s victims, told New York publisher Tony Lyons that Giuffre lied about her age when she met Epstein.

“She took a year off [her age]. Apparently she was 16, not 15, when she was recruited [by Epstein]. But she’d been on the game for about a year then. Epstein’s women were – he basically had prostitutes,” the paper quoted Churcher as saying about Giuffre, citing a transcript of her conversation with Lyons.

Churcher was quoted as saying that Giuffre was “suing everybody,” including Epstein’s lawyer, Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz. “The idea is that he will then pay her off. This really is blackmail,” she said, adding that Giuffre would “just move on to other people” and that Epstein had “paid her off.”

“She had settled with Epstein. She’d taken half a million, I think it was.”

The journalist also reportedly suggested that Giuffre may have produced fake emails that were later presented as having been written by Churcher.

In a comment to the Telegraph, Giuffre’s lawyer, Chuck Cooper, said: “We are looking forward to taking Ms. Churcher’s deposition under oath.”

This is absolutely insane the way the media has been able to take a story about the Jewish Mossad running a blackmail operation in the United States and make it about the hookers themselves. Hookers are NOT “victims.” This is an idiotic feminist narrative, whenever it is applied, but applying it here is particularly egregious.

The media has diverted the entire focus of this story, which is very important, to make it about how sad it is that these girls got paid tens of thousands of dollars to work as hookers, and how that is “slavery.”

It’s not slavery. It’s called being a hooker. If we don’t want women to be hookers, then we should take their rights away from them, instead of doing this thing where they are victims of their own choices.

The Jeffrey Epstein story should be about the powerful people that were meeting with him and agreeing to have sex with underage girls on camera. It should be about why they were doing that, and who benefited from it. It should be about how he died, and why that isn’t being investigated.

Where are the tapes of all these powerful men having sex with underage girls? Why are they not being prosecuted? Why is every decision they made after agreeing to this blackmail not being questioned?

What were the Jews trying to use this blackmail ring for? Was there an underlying goal of the operation, beyond simply promoting the interests of Israel?

What is going on with the satanic temple on Epstein’s private island?

We need to be looking into all of this.

The Epstein scandal should not be about the hookers themselves, who are completely irrelevant, and it shouldn’t be about this poor moron Prince Andrew, who just got sucked into this out of his own idiocy, and doesn’t appear to have actually done anything very serious, other than befriending a nasty Jew.

It is so discouraging the way the public can be redirected from the most important things to the most inane and meaningless things.

The British royal family has been alleged to secretly be a bunch of shape-shifting reptoids from another dimension. According to rumors from insiders, they engage in cannibalism, but actually, it isn’t even really cannibalism, because they’re not humans.

They are also satanic pedophiles, according to several experts.

There is one thing, however, that they will not tolerate: toe-sucking.

The toe-sucker Prince Andrew is now being excised from the family of reptoids as a result of his toe-sucking ways.

Metro UK:

Prince Andrew faces being ‘airbrushed’ out of his father’s 100th birthday celebrations next year, it’s been reported.

The scandal-hit prince won’t be invited to several of the major celebrations for Philip’s centenary and organisers of a photo exhibition have been told to leave out pictures of him, according to The Sun.

A palace source told the newspaper: ‘There is a warning from up high to play down Andrew. He will be included as little as possible.

‘It’s not whitewashing history because you can’t leave him out entirely. But it will not make a big deal of his relationship with the Duke of Edinburgh over the years.

‘This is obviously proving difficult because he is his son and it’s playing down his role in the family.’

Prince Andrew stepped down from Royal duties late last year after his Newsnight interview which was widely seen as a disaster.

He claimed he couldn’t have slept with Virginia Giuffre when she was 17 because he was at Pizza Express in Woking on the night in question.

The prince still faces questions about his relationship with billionaire paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, who has been arrested for allegedly trafficking underage girls. Andrew has consistently denied any wrong doing.

Not a lot of people know this, but Prince Andrew was an original member of the country music super-group “The Highwaymen.”

Do you remember the song “Highwayman”?

Each verse of the song was sung by a different superstar, and told the story of the life of someone, and their end.

This was Andrew’s verse, which proved to be quite prophetic:

I was a toe-sucker
Teenaged toes I liked to lick
Sucked ’em slow and sucked ’em quick
Many a young maid stuck her feet into my face
I sucked ’em sweet with dignity and grace
The bastards outed me on Newsnight Channel Two
Because I am not a Jew

That verse was never recorded, because Prince Philip said it couldn’t be known that members of the reptoid family were toe-suckers.

Allegedly, he said: “bloody feckin ell laddie, ya know to lot of us got heaps a problems what for it, we been right scolded fer bein blood drink lizards, but toe-suckin is a bridge too far south.”

The Level of Exhaustion Involved Here

What we had with Jeffrey Epstein was a very obvious Israeli Mossad blackmail operation. People who wanted power would be sent to Epstein, they would have sex with an underage girl on film, then they would be approved of to move up in the world, because the Jews would know that they couldn’t ever deviate from the plan.

Prince Andrew was quite possibly the only person involved with having sex with these girls who literally had nothing to gain from doing so. Thus, the single person that we are talking about with regards to this news story is Prince Andrew.

He is the perfect fall guy, because he literally does not matter. No one is talking about Bill Gates or any of the politicians who also spent time with Epstein. It’s just all about Prince Andrew, who probably didn’t even commit a crime, given that the girl whose toes he sucked was over the age of consent and he didn’t personally pay her money.

A court could argue that Andrew knew that the girl was being paid to have sex with him, and that would make the situation potentially more complicated, as although it isn’t against the law to have sex with a 17-year-old, it is a different story if it’s “sex trafficking.” However, I don’t think it could be proved that Andrew knew Epstein was paying her.

But this is really how stupid the goyim actually are: they’re looking at the entire power structure of the Western world, the basis upon which all decisions are made – it is literally laid out completely, right in front of their eyes, the way the Jews control world leaders. But the media comes out and is like, “this goofy guy was sucking on a teenage girl’s toes! She thought he was GROSS!”, and the goyim say: “OH. MY. GOD.”

The entire situation proves the reality that the masses of people are incapable of thinking beyond what is shown to them directly, and laid out in a pornographic manner.

The media could obviously just as easily be talking nonstop about Bill Gates being involved with Epstein, and saying that it proves that coronavirus is a Jewish plot to destroy Christian civilization, and everyone would be calling for a war against Israel.

But nope. You get lurid porno material about a toe-sucking doofus.

You can just get people to go along with anything. This is why I’ve told you that “democracy” simply means “rule by the media.”

And hey – don’t forget: Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s madam, is still in federal custody. There is basically a 100% chance that she is going to come out and accuse Donald Trump of some sexual act with underage girls before the election. The Jewish media has already tried to pin Epstein-related crimes on Trump.

In actual fact, Donald Trump slyly suggested publicly that the man was engaged in these activities.

In 2002, before Epstein was ever outed as a sex criminal, Trump was interviewed by New York Magazine about Epstein, and he said: “It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”

Trump also kicked the Jew out of his country club.

Further, Trump is not enough of a moron to allow Jews to get blackmail on him. If the Jews did have blackmail on him, they would have already dumped it. They are going to pretend they have blackmail on him.

The Israeli Mossad was caught running a blackmail ring involving underage girls.

The thing is: you can’t protest the Israeli embassy for doing this, because the Holocaust.

And you can’t protest the Moslems for picking up 11-year-old girls outside of elementary schools to use as unpaid prostitutes, because of the Crusades.

So, your only option is to protest the sweatless toe-sucker, Prince Andrew.

He’s a pedophile for having sex with a 17-year-old hooker.

Daily Express:

Watch the moment an enraged crowd of people gathered outside Buckingham Palace and appeared to chant “paedophile” repeatedly.

The footage is from a ‘Freedom For The Children Global Walk London’ protest that took place in London on Saturday. The footage has been viewed by more than three million people since it was posted on Twitter.

The protest reportedly started at 1.30pm on August 22 and involved the protesters marching to Parliament Square as well as Buckingham Palace.

Similar protests have been held in Liverpool and Manchester.

Protesters were encouraged to wear white t-shirts to the march.

‘Freedom For The Children Global Walk London’ took to Facebook to explain more regarding the protest.

The Facebook post said: “The purpose of this walk for change is to bring awareness to the current reality of child exploitation within our own communities and around the world.

“Let’s show our devotion and determination toward protecting these children, our communities most vulnerable, by requesting change and reformation within our government and law enforcement agencies to ensure that justice is brought in such a manner that it will significantly reduce instances of child exploitation while promoting awareness in order to end this ongoing issue.”

One protester wrote on Twitter: “I was there. It was a peaceful walk followed by a group meditation starting at the London Eye on to the Palace then to Downing Street.

“Organised by ‘Freedom For The Children’ FB group for #EndChildTrafficking We had full police support.”

In the footage, some of the protestors appear to be waving banners emblazoned with Queen Elizabeth II’s son, Prince Andrew.

Some of the placards appear to condemn the Duke of York for his relationship with deceased paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

Again, the girl was 17.

Does she look like a child?

It’s not only “not pedophilia,” it probably wasn’t even against the law.

The age of consent in the Virgin Islands, where Epstein’s island is, is 16.

It’s different legally when prostitution is involved, probably (although Andrew potentially didn’t know about the payments and did not pay her himself), but it doesn’t magically become “pedophilia.”

You know what is pedophilia?

This:

Why don’t they protest Netflix?

Would that also be anti-Semitic?

It’s just incredible the way the media has turned the public uncovering of a Mossad blackmail ring into being about the feelings of the prostitutes and about Prince Andrew.

The walls are closing in on the mastermind of the Jeffrey Epstein sex ring.

There’s nowhere left for the man who planned it all to run.

He spent his life licking toes – now he’s going to get the boot, once and for all.

Daily Mirror:

A woman who claims she was forced to have sex with Prince Andrew says she is “running out of hope” that he will be punished.

Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who claims she was trafficked by financier Jeffrey Epstein, alleges Prince Andrew had sex with her on three separate occasions – including when she was 17, still a minor under US law.

This morning she claimed she was “gifted” to the royal, and voiced her fury on Twitter.

She wrote: “All the evidence you could poke a stick out and yet the justice system defends a known predator who just happens to be a prince, anyone else would be thrown into jail.

“He knew I had no choice- he knew I was being trafficked- gifted to him. Nothings all right. Running out of hope.”

Ms Giuffre, who was pictured with the Duke of York in London in London, has previously said she hopes Andrew is put “in a cell next to his best mate” Ghislaine Maxwell.

The former teen ‘sex slave’ of Jeffrey Epstein spoke out after the chief of the Metropolitan Police offered to assist US authorities with their investigation into the US paedophile.

Dame Cressida Dick said that while the focus of the FBI probe was “clearly” in America, she added the Met would assist US authorities should it be required “at any stage”.

The help could include looking at Andrew’s ties to his friends Epstein and Maxwell.

When “The Sweatless Prince” put together this sex ring and wrangled with the likes of college drop-out Jeffrey Epstein and his girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell, he thought his toe-licking days would never end.

I wonder where all that heat is going now, since he can’t sweat?

Probably, he’s crying like the big baby he is.

A lot of people are saying that Jeffrey Epstein was the mastermind of the Epstein sex ring. Others are saying it was Maxwell.

There’s a simple answer to these charges: if one of those Jews was responsible, then why would the media only ever be talking about Prince Andrew?

Checkmate, anti-Semite. 

We’ve got some big time important news related to the Mossad sex trafficking blackmail ring run by Jews Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell coming in straight off the wire.

Get this: Prince Andrew is a foot fetishist…!

If you ever wondered what was behind those stone-cold eyes of his, now you know: it was dreams of licking sweet toes…!

He might have broken sweat glands that make him unable to sweat, but he’s got a perfectly working tongue for licking toes…!

New York Post:

Jeffrey Epstein “sex slave” Virginia Giuffre allegedly spent two days alone with Prince Andrew at the financier’s ranch, “endlessly’’ catering to every need of the royal — who especially enjoyed licking between her toes.

The claims were made in a manuscript that the Epstein accuser wrote about her alleged abuse at the hands of the late multimillionaire, his accused madam Ghislaine Maxwell and rich and powerful men including the prince — part of a trove of court documents released last week amid Maxwell’s battle against sex-trafficking-related charges in Manhattan.

Giuffre wrote in her book proposal — titled “The Billionaire Playboy’s Club’’ — that it was hard for her to stomach some of the men’s bizarre sexual preferences.

“It wasn’t easy meeting the sexual desires of these strange men, the Prince being one of them,” she claimed, according to the Daily Mail.

Giuffre has alleged she had sex three separate times with the prince — essentially pimped out to him by Epstein and Maxwell — a claim the royal has vigorously denied.

“He loved my feet and even licked in between my toes,’’ Giuffre wrote of the prince. But “there was the lack of passion in the intimacy we shared, to him I was just another girl, and to me, he was just another job.’’

Yeah, that is typically how it works between a hooker and a john. There is romance, but it is manufactured romance. That is because the girl is being paid cash to pretend to be a man’s girlfriend, when in actuality, she isn’t really his girlfriend.

Giuffre wrote that Maxwell sent her alone to Epstein’s sprawling Zorro ranch in 2001, when she was around 17 or 18, to meet the Duke of York, whom she had already allegedly had sex with at least once in London. He would have been around 41 at the time.

Hold on, let me get out my Googles here real quick…

Yeah. That’s what I thought.

The now-36-year-old mom of three said she wasn’t told which of Epstein’s buddies would be there to greet her.

She said Andrew met her with “Hello” — and “that same old cheesy grin.

“What a sight,” Giuffre wrote.

“He wrapped his arms around my waist and greeted me like an old friend. I hugged him back, rolling my eyes at the same time, already dreading what lay in store over the next couple of days.

“My job was to entertain him endlessly, whether that meant having to bestow him my body during an erotic massage or simply take him horseback riding.”

She said she felt disgusted afterward — although she was paid handsomely by Epstein for the visit, nearly $1,000.

She said she then flew back to New York to meet up with Epstein and Maxwell.

“So … how was the ranch with the Prince?” Maxwell asked, according to Giuffre in the manuscript.

Giuffre replied, “I took him horseback riding, nowhere too far around the property, um … we went swimming in the pool, and of course I gave him plenty of massages. He had a massage at least a couple times each day, really seeming to enjoy his time there.

“I think he had a really good time, he seemed relaxed during the trip, and when we said goodbye to each other, he gave me a kiss,’’ she said she told the pair.

Giuffre said she could see she was telling Epstein and Maxwell “what they wanted to hear’’ but that she felt “disgusted about the whole thing,’’ the Mail said.

Well, I’m sure she feels disgusted now that she can’t run around having sex with princes because she’s old and fat.

Sorry, I absolutely do not believe that a teenage prostitute felt disgusted about having sex with a prince at the time. I simply do not believe this. If it did disgust her, then why didn’t she quit? None of these girls were held captive by Epstein.

Whatever the case, I’m sorry, but the emotions of this prostitute are not something that is important to this story of the Jewish Mossad running a blackmail ring in the United States and being protected by the FBI while doing it.

“Like two proud parents they both looked over me with such content. ‘Good, you did really well,’ Jeffrey complimented me,” Giuffre said.

She wrote that then, “We all ventured up to Jeffrey’s office and out came the infamous duffel bag that went wherever he did,’’ according to the Mail.

“I was given close to a thousand dollars for my time in Santa Fe, more than what I thought anybody at my young age could make for a couple days of work,” she wrote.

Yes, prostitution is really profitable in relation to what young girls are able to make doing other jobs. That is one of the reasons it has always been such a popular profession for young girls. The fact that it is profitable, however, is probably secondary to the fact that it is exciting for young girls to have sex with a huge number of men, often men who have a status much higher than the ones they would otherwise be meeting, and to also have the excuse that they are “powerless” to avoid being involved in these sexual actions.

Most hookers enjoy their time as a hooker, and then as their looks disappear, they move on into a different phase of their life. This woman Giuffre, however, is using the bitterness of her old age as a weapon.

On one level, it’s good that she’s doing this, because it is helping get this story of Jeffrey Epstein out into the public. However, on another level, the fact that she is becoming the story – that her emotions regarding her work as a prostitute are the most important angle for the media – is burying the aspects of the story that actually matter.

It is absolutely bizarre to me that the automatic angle on the story of a Jewish operative using sex to create blackmail files on powerful men in America is “oh my God, the poor hookers!”

When in all of history have hookers been looked at as victims? All throughout the history that I am aware of, it was understood that women who get involved in prostitution are women of low character, that they get their 40 pieces of silver in exchange for their pound of flesh, and that they are never deserving of pity, even if they are viewed as above contempt.

Right now, right in front of your very eyes in virtually every story published about this topic, the actual thing of interest, which is the Mossad blackmail ring angle of the story, is being buried in favor of talking about the innocence of the poor hookers.

It is in fact amazing that the West is so obsessed with white knighting that this trick can happen right in front of their eyes, and they don’t even notice it. The masses simply say, “well, of course the most important aspect of this story is the wellbeing of the hookers…! This one had to have her toes licked by a prince! Can you imagine the trauma she must have felt???”

You can’t go after the Mossad Jews that were actually running the operation, but you can apparently go big and go international on a sweaty prince.

RT:

Britain’s Prince Andrew has reportedly been summoned by the US Justice Department to answer questions about his relationship with deceased pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. The pair were friends for over a decade.

The Southern District Court of New York has asked Prince Andrew to testify in the ongoing criminal investigation into Epstein’s alleged accomplices via a Mutual Legal Assistance request filed with the UK Home Office, ABC News reported on Sunday. According to the Sun, which first broke the story, the request was formally lodged last month.

Prince Andrew could be forced to provide testimony under oath in a UK court if the Home Office approves the US court’s request. Should he refuse to either give a signed statement or provide evidence under oath, US prosecutors could issue a summons that would compel him to answer questions in person. The royal has categorically denied any wrongdoing in relation to his friendship with the jet-setting sex offender, who supposedly committed suicide in prison last year while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges.

As recently as January, head prosecutor for the Epstein case Geoffrey Berman had expressed frustration with the prince’s failure to assist in the ongoing probe of Epstein’s criminal associates, noting “Prince Andrew has provided zero cooperation.” The prince had pledged during a BBC Newsnight interview in November that he would help with the US investigation if his “legal advice was to do so.” Shortly after that TV appearance, branded disastrous and “cringe-worthy” by many,  he was demoted within the royal family, stepping back from public life.”

While Prince Andrew has denied witnessing anything illegal while palling around with Epstein, accuser Virginia Roberts Giuffre has claimed they had sex three times when she was 17. A photo of Giuffre with the prince has been widely circulated. The prince claims to have met Epstein in 1999, having been introduced by socialite and alleged Epstein madam Ghislaine Maxwell – who is still at large despite supposedly being wanted for questioning by the FBI.

They’re basically trying to make Andrew go down for this whole thing, even though all he was was a single client of Epstein. He was also the stupidest of all, because he was apparently only involved because he was looking for friends. Most of these people needed to be involved in order to get blackmail on themselves and thus get approval from the Jews.

That’s why all the politicians and people like Bill Gates were involved.

What did Andrew get?

The only thing you can say is that he got friends. Surely, if it was about having sex with technically legal underage girls, he could have found that elsewhere. He is a prince.

And understand: if you don’t do it in the context of sex trafficking, you are allowed to have sex with 16-year-old girls. So he could be publicly bringing home girls the same age as those he’s accused of having sex with without any consequences.

So basically: GG faggot.

Will Prince Andrew get double fired for having sex with a second jailbait?

The Sun:

A second woman allegedly abused by paedophile billionaire Jeffrey Epstein has claimed she had sex with Prince Andrew.

The fresh allegations come after Epstein’s “sex slave” Virginia Roberts went on TV to claim she was ordered to have sex with Andrew when she was aged 17.

Prince Andrew has repeatedly denied the claims and says he has “no recollection” of meeting 17-year-old Roberts, or having a photo taken with her.

Roberts, whose married name is now Giuffre, alleges that she and Andrew, 59, had sex three times from 2001.

Appearing on BBC’s Panorama, Roberts said: “He knows what happened. I know what happened, and there’s only one of us telling the truth, and I know that’s me.”

In the latest claims against the Duke of York, The Mirror reports the second woman – unnamed – has been speaking to lawyers representing Epstein’s other alleged victims.

Lawyers are reportedly looking into whether the new allegations will be used as part of a lawsuit against Epstein’s estate.

There is nothing in the latest reports to suggest the woman was coerced into having sex with Andrew.

Buckingham Palace said they would not be commenting on the latest claims.

Probably a good idea to not comment.

The last time they commented, it did not turn out well for them.

By the way, the BBC interview with Giuffre was really unmoving.

She was 17, she was flying around with a billionaire, she was never forced to do anything – but she felt as though she was being forced, or so she claims.

I don’t know how you can confirm this girl’s feelings.

Basically, I’m not even sure if this is illegal.

It isn’t illegal to have sex with a 17-year-old in Britain or America. If she was internationally “trafficked” specifically for the purposes of sex, that would be illegal. But the instance she describes, where she went to a club with Andrew and he was sweating all over her and she was told by Ghislaine Maxwell to have sex with him – you would have to prove that she was forced in order for that sex to be illegal, and she is talking about how she “felt” forced.

But why did she keep getting on these planes and flying around the world with this Jew who was “raping” her and letting other men “rape” her?

She never says there were any guns involved. No big men dragging her. No threats of anything. They were just pouring money on her and letting her go with them to all of these extravagant events around the globe, then suggesting she have sex with people.

Allegedly there were girls younger than her involved. And yeah, when you get into the earlier teens, that should be and is illegal, even if they’re just sluts who deserved it (which I believe they are).

But this Giuffre story is really just dumb. Even if she was somehow “manipulated” into having sex with Andrew – and I don’t believe it is possible to manipulate a woman into having sex with anyone, women are very aware of what is going on with sex dynamics – then you still have the question of why she decided to keep showing up.

When Epstein called her and was like “c’mon, babe, we’re flying out to Britain to hang out with the Prince,” she could have just said “ow, sorry Jeffrey, I can’t, I’m busy.”

Never is she asked why she didn’t do that, never is it implied that there was some reason she didn’t do that. It’s all just “oh my poor dear, you were just a child.”

Basically, this bitch is just trying to get paid.

I assume the rest of the ones coming out are doing the same.

That isn’t to say Epstein wasn’t involved in actual pedophilia, and actual weird Jewish satanism, or whatever else he’s accused of being involved in. But this stuff with teenage girls appears to just be a massive hoax that the Jew lawyers of these women are doing to get a paycheck.

Also, these Jew lawyers are trying to put everything on the goy fall-guy Andrew while we get no information about any of the other stuff, especially not the fact that this whole thing was being run by the Mossad.

The Sun does not have a bad track record, as these things go. In fact, they’re less likely to print outright fake news than the New York Times or the Washington Post.

The Sun:

Prince Andrew’s pal Ghislaine Maxwell will speak to the FBI about their links to paedo Jeffrey Epstein.

Sources said the sex slaver’s “madam”, 57, aims to emerge from hiding within days.

Sources say she is set to defend herself and the prince.

She has told pals she thinks the picture of them with Virginia Roberts, who claims she had sex with Andrew when she was 17, may have been doctored.

It was said to have been taken at her London home in March 2001.

A source said: “Like Andrew, she has no memory of it.

“Ghislaine thinks there are a lot of problems with the picture and it is very fishy.

“It is one of very few photos that does not bear a time and date stamp.”

A US source close to her lawyers said: “Ghislaine is preparing to speak — whether by talking to the FBI or giving a statement to the media.

She is more likely to give a statement to the media than talk to the FBI, and I doubt she is planning on coming out of hiding. I do not doubt that The Sun has a source that told them this. But it would have been planted.

Just like Maxwell planted those fake photos of herself eating a burger in California.

Nothing is going to happen with any of this stuff, I can tell you that. If something was going to happen, Epstein never would have been killed in the first place.

They can crucify the Half-Retard Prince, but they can’t have a genuine investigation into Maxwell, because she’s a Mossad agent who was presumably also employed by American intelligence.

One thing you have to give the British credit for: they go big on their hats.

This fuels my theory that this interview was intended to be an absolute shitshow for the purpose of getting everyone to focus on Prince Andrew and forget about the rest of the whole Jeffrey Epstein jailbait sex ring scandal.

Daily Mail:

The Duke of York’s former wife Sarah Ferguson and daughter Princess Beatrice were among the key figures pressing him to go ahead with last weekend’s disastrous Newsnight interview.

The Mail on Sunday understands that the Duchess of York had been keen to end the speculation about Andrew’s involvement with convicted paedophile and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein ahead of Beatrice’s wedding to property developer Edo Mapelli Mozzi next year.

Fergie is also believed to have been convinced that if the public could see the Duke – or ‘my boy’, as she is said to call him – talking in his own words about the scandal, they would be convinced that he was telling the truth.

She could hardly have been more wrong.

Yeah, either that or the Jews came to her and were like “let’s set up your ex-husband to look like a complete asshole, who people will believe is guilty of whatever he’s accused of.”

The entire concept of an interview in this context was stupid. There was literally no way it could have benefited him. But if they were going to do an interview, they obviously could have done a completely controlled, scripted interview, where he didn’t say things like “I lost my ability to sweat” and appear to defend Epstein.

The only conceivable reason anyone would set the interview up like this is if they wanted to create a massive spectacle. And creating a massive spectacle makes sense if you want to distract the goyim from the hunt for Ghislaine Maxwell, the fact that we still don’t have any idea who killed Epstein or why he was ever arrested in the first place, and all of the other bizarre details surrounding this situation.

This was the biggest news story in decades and it’s turned into a “peasants throwing rotten fruit at a disgraced moron” event.