Poland is introducing a pregnancy register. In conjunction with the abortion ban, people are scared this could be used to intimidate and spy on women, to track and prosecute those who travel abroad for abortion.

This law has to be stopped.

— James Jackson (@derJamesJackson) June 6, 2022

The plan here is probably not even to stop stealth abortions.

But women are freaking out, because the number one thing women fear is men trying to stop their abortions.

They see abortion stoppers behind every coroner.

AP:

The government of Poland, where a near-total abortion ban is in place, faced accusations Monday of creating a “pregnancy register” as the country expands the amount of medical data being digitally saved on patients.

Women’s rights advocates and opposition politicians fear women face unprecedented surveillance given the conservative views of a ruling party that has already tightened what was one of Europe’s most restrictive abortion laws.

They fear the new data could be used by police and prosecutors against women whose pregnancies end, even in cases of miscarriage, or that women could be tracked by the state if they order abortion pills or travel abroad for an abortion.

“A pregnancy registry in a country with an almost complete ban on abortion is terrifying,” said Agnieszka Dziemianowicz-Bąk, a left-wing lawmaker.

The matter gained attention Monday after Health Minister Adam Niedzielski signed an ordinance Friday expanding the amount of information to be saved in a central database on patients, including information on allergies, blood type and pregnancies.

The health ministry spokesman, Wojciech Andrusiewicz, sought to allay concerns, saying only medical professionals will have access to the data, and that the changes are being made at the recommendation of the European Union.

The effort, he said, is meant to improve the medical treatment of patients, including if they seek treatment elsewhere in the 27-member EU. In the case of pregnant women, he said this will help doctors immediately know which women should not get X-rays or certain medicines.

“Nobody is creating a pregnancy register in Poland,” he told the TVN24 all-news station.

But Marta Lempart, the leader of a women’s rights group, Women’s Strike, said she does not trust the government to keep information on women’s pregnancies from the police and prosecutors. She told The Associated Press that police in Poland are already questioning women on how their pregnancies end, tipped off by disgruntled partners.

“Being pregnant means that police can come to you any time and prosecutors can come to you to ask you questions about your pregnancy,” Lempart said.

All of this leftist stuff is now so goofy at this point that none of them can possibly claim that they are actually following any kind of code of ethics.

It is all purely about pushing forward with their selfish, evil agenda, and there are so many overlapping selfish, evil agendas, that the whole thing just looks like a mess.

It’s about protecting the elderly and fat people.

That is what democracy is all about.

It’s who we are.

The Guardian:

Pregnant and breastfeeding people are facing abysmal vaccination rates and increasing health risks from the Delta variant, and they urgently need to be vaccinated, experts warn.

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Wednesday “strongly” recommended vaccination before or during pregnancy, echoing calls in August for the life-saving shots.

Only one-third of pregnant adults in the US have received the Covid vaccines – less than half the vaccination rate of all American adults. And stark disparities exist among different communities, with only 15.6% of Black pregnant people vaccinated so far.

At the same time, pregnancy is a risk factor for serious illness from the coronavirus. Being pregnant and unvaccinated doubles the risk of needing intensive care for those who have Covid, and leads to a 70% increased risk of death. In August alone, 22 pregnant people died from the virus.

Births are also more likely to be premature or stillborn, and newborns may also struggle with Covid infection.

It’s also important to vaccinate breastfeeding parents, both to form a cocoon of immunity around newborns and to pass antibodies through the milk, experts say.

It is a hoax. They are lying. Babies are not dying of coronavirus. Kids are not dying of coronavirus.

These are their numbers.

People are not dying of coronavirus.

Anna Euser was 32 weeks pregnant when the shot was offered to her late last year, and she took it immediately.

At that time, there were no data from the clinical trials about how well the vaccines worked in pregnant people. But Euser is an obstetrician/gynecologist and an associate professor of maternal fetal medicine for the University of Colorado School of Medicine. She had seen first-hand the way Covid wreaks havoc on pregnant people and their families.

“I felt very comfortable with the benefits of the vaccine, and the importance of getting it to protect both myself and my daughter, because that was one of the few things I could do to protect her,” Euser told the Guardian. “This was really the one strategy we have to try to protect both ourselves and our children.”

Now, thanks to volunteers like Euster, we do have data on how safe and effective the vaccines are among pregnant and nursing people. She was one of 827 participants in a study finding the vaccines were very safe.

That study was recently corrected because there’s really no evidence that the vaccines are safe for pregnant women.

Even with all we know about fake news, it’s kind of shocking for The Guardian to continue citing a study that has effectively been retracted (they didn’t use the term “retraction” and instead invented a new term in medical literature, calling a retracted claim a “correction”).

Practitioners feel very confident recommending the vaccine as safe and effective, Euser said. “The vaccine is one of the best-studied things out there.” There’s much more evidence on the safety and efficacy of vaccines than there is, for instance, on experimental treatments like monoclonal antibodies and other medications, as well as using ECMO, a type of life support machine, in pregnancy.

They are lying.

Here’s an indisputable fact of reality: these people can’t know what happens a few years down the line to the babies of pregnant women who took the vaccine because not enough time has passed.

There is no way for them to know how the kids are going to grow up, what will happen to them compared to kids whose mothers didn’t take the vaccine, what will happen to the offspring of these kids from vaccinated mothers, or if the kids from vaccinated mothers will be able to produce any offspring at all.

Scaring women into taking this experimental injection is evil.

The New York Times published an opinion piece by two economics professors, Melissa S. Kearney and Phillip B. Levine, that looks into some of the causes and consequences of the declining birth rates.

New York Times:

The Covid-19 pandemic has thrown the country into an economic recession and an unprecedented restructuring of our work and social lives. Early on, some likened the public health crisis to a blizzard, imagining that people would stay home, cozy up with their romantic partners and make babies.

These playful visions have given way to a more sobering reality: The pandemic’s serious disruption of people’s lives is likely to cause “missing births” — potentially a lot of them. Add these missing births to the country’s decade-long downward trend in annual births and we can expect consequential changes to our economy and society in the years to come. Unfortunately, there are no easy fixes.

(“Unfortunately, there are no easy fixes”? What? The easy fix is to incentive marriage and children, and disincentivize divorce and infertility. The government is already printing trillions of dollars, why not give some to couples who have kids?)

Research we did last year showed that the Covid pandemic would lead to a decline in U.S. births of about 8 percent, as compared with the number of expected births without a pandemic, resulting in 300,000 fewer births this year than would otherwise be expected. This prediction was based largely on the fact that economic factors affect people’s decisions about whether and when to have a baby.

…

School closures, public-gathering limits and social-distancing mandates are also likely to have an effect. Millions of parents are dealing with the stress of combining their work responsibilities with the need to supervise and teach their children who no longer attend school five days a week. This raises the “cost” of rearing children and can be expected to lead to fewer siblings being conceived this year.

Moreover, restrictions on social activities also mean some relationships that would have started in 2020 (and might have led to babies someday) never took root. We have no precedent to estimate changes in birthrates from these disruptions, but they will undoubtedly also contribute to a large reduction in overall births.

Recent data confirms the likelihood of a sizable “baby bust.” Surveys conducted this summer revealed that couples were intentionally putting their pregnancy plans on hold and having sex less often. Google searches for pregnancy-related terms, such as pregnancy tests, were down. Averted conceptions starting with the pandemic’s arrival in March 2020 would show up as missing births starting in December 2020. Official birth data from the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics will not be available for many more months, but some states have already released provisional birth data. In January 2021, which would be the first month in which all full-term babies born were conceived after the lockdown began, births fell by 7.2 percent in Florida and 10.5 percent in California, after adjusting for secular trends, seasonal variation and the use of provisional birth data.

…

In the absence of effective policies to meaningfully increase births, the most reliable and immediate way to shore up the U.S. population is through immigration, which brings its own political and social challenges. To maintain economic growth without immigration to offset the decline in births, we would need an increase in the share of working-age individuals employed or an increase in the productivity of workers, or both. But both employment rates and productivity have also been falling. Turning things around will require a significant investment of public resources to improve our country’s economic competitiveness.

The declining birthrate has been an issue for years, and the pandemic has pushed it into overdrive. This is likely to have demographic, social and economic implications for many years to come.

Every incentive now is to push down the white birth rate, and replace whites with nonwhites.

Do you think nonwhites are not having kids because of a fake virus? Blacks and Mexicans?

Of course they are.

The people that are skipping having kids are the people who plan to have kids, which are overwhelmingly going to be white. This is 300,000 fewer white babies.

This is just another very convenient coincidental result of the “pandemic.”