Teen pop star Billie Eilish is ashamed of her racist past, and has taken the first steps towards atoning for her sins.

Billie, who is best known for licking black men, has revealed she’s working hard to fight against inequality.

But she’s not doing enough.

Daily Mail:

Billie Eilish has revealed she feels ‘ashamed’ about her past actions surfacing online.

In a new interview with Vogue Australia, the 19-year-old pop superstar said that everyone has an ’embarrassing’ past – including her.

‘It’s really weird how the world can see every aspect of your life and reminisce about [it]. It’s so weird,’ the Bad Guy singer said.

‘The internet brings up things from everybody’s past and I’m like: “Don’t you guys understand that everybody is incredibly embarrassed and ashamed about their past?”

‘Like, do you not think about the fact that maybe you’re embarrassed of your past, so maybe everybody else is embarrassed, too?’

The performer, who also stars in a stunning fashion shoot in this month’s issue of the magazine, added that she has changed her mind on many of her past views.

‘I said so many things then that I totally don’t agree with now, or think the opposite thing,’ she admitted.

‘The weirdest thing is how nothing ever goes away once it’s on the internet. Every interview I did when I was 15 is still out there, and I think about it constantly.’

The comments come after Billie said that she was ’embarrassed and appalled’ last month when a video of her when she was a younger teen emerged on TikTok, showing her mouthing a racist slur.

In a statement on Instagram, Billie said she was being ‘labeled some thing that [she’s] not’ in connection with the old clips.

‘There’s a video edit going around of me when I was 13 or 14 where I’m mouthed the word for the song that at the time I didn’t know it was a derogatory term used against members of the Asian community,’ she wrote on Instagram. ‘I am appalled and embarrassed I want to barf that I ever mouth belong to that word.

‘This song was the only time I’ve ever heard that word as it was never used around me by anyone and my family. Regardless of my ignorance and age at the time, nothing excuses the fact that it was hurtful. And for that I am sorry.’

She also addressed a second clip that showed her appearing to mock an Asian accent.

She added that the negative response ‘breaks [her] heart’ because she wouldn’t want people to be hurt by her, even if it was due to a misinterpretation.

‘Regardless of how it was interpreted I did not mean for any of my actions to have caused hurt to others and now it absolutely breaks my heart that it is being labeled now in a way that might cause pain to people hearing it,’ she said. ‘I not only believe in, but I’ve always worked hard to use my platform to fight for inclusion, kindness, tolerance, equity and equality.’

She says she fights for equality, so she has some explaining to do.

Where are all of the pictures of her hugging Asian men?

She cannot possibly expect people to believe she’s not racist against Asian men if she’s only engaging in degrading sexual acts with black men, can she?

The only way for us whites to atone for the original sin of being intrinsically mean to People of Color is to give our women away to other races and species. It is easy for white women to have sex with black men, because white women love becoming the sex toys of blacks, but Aryan Princesses must not forget that blacks aren’t the only People of Color they must appease.

White women also have a duty towards Asian men and Australian aboriginals.

Popular music is a psychological operation. In fact, pop culture in general is a psychological operation.  New research shows that music and movies affect people’s emotional states.

Study Finds:

Music can evoke a wide variety of different emotions in listeners. While some songs put a smile on our faces all day, other can bring us to tears in seconds! So, can your brain’s reaction to music reveal what kind of tunes you’re listening to? A new study finds researchers can actually tell if a person is hearing happy or sad music based on the activity going on in certain regions of the brain.

A team from the University of Turku in Finland examined 102 participants listening to music while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging, or an fMRI. Using machine learning algorithms to map the brain, researchers located which areas light up when exposed to different emotion-inducing songs.

“Based on the activation of the auditory and motor cortex, we were able to accurately predict whether the research subject was listening to happy or sad music. The auditory cortex processes the acoustic elements of music, such as rhythm and melody. Activation of the motor cortex, then again, may be related to the fact that music inspires feelings of movement in the listeners even when they are listening to music while holding still in an MRI machine,” explains postdoctoral researcher Vesa Putkinen in a university release.

The Finnish team also discovered which brain areas are active while watching various films that bring forth strong emotions. They tested if these regions are the same ones which are stimulated by music. The results suggest that what you see and what you hear actually spark different mechanisms in the brain when it comes to emotions.

“Films, for instance, activate the deeper parts of the brain that regulate emotions in real-life situations. Listening to music did not strongly activate these regions nor did their activation separate the music-induced emotions from each other,” Putkinen reports. “This may be due to the fact that films can more realistically copy the real-life events that evoke emotions and thus activate the innate emotion mechanisms. As for the music-induced emotions, they are based on the acoustic characteristics of music and colored by cultural influences and personal history.”

Considering that Jews are behind most popular music and movies, the implications of this are pretty grim.

When people listen to music and watch movies or TV series, they’re giving the keys to their emotional state to whoever or whatever created the media they’re allowing into their mind.

Emotions affect decisions.

From a May 9, 2018 Forbes article:

According to Herbert Simon, American Nobel Laureate scientist, “In order to have anything like a complete theory of human rationality, we have to understand what role emotion plays in it.”

As Dr. Simon and others have pointed out, emotions influence, skew or sometimes completely determine the outcome of a large number of decisions we are confronted with in a day. Therefore, it behooves all of us who want to make the best, most objective decisions to know all we can about emotions and their effect on our decision-making.

But, just in case you’re not sold on what I and Dr. Simon say, and you continue to believe you can make decisions free of emotional bias, let’s look at how emotions are formed and how they are transformed into actionable feelings.

First, every feeling begins with an external stimulus, whether it’s what someone said or a physical event. That stimulus generates an unfelt emotion in the brain, which causes the body to produce responsive hormones. These hormones enter the bloodstream and create feelings, sometimes negative and sometimes positive.

So, to review, it’s stimuli, then emotions, then hormones and, finally, feelings. In other words, your emotions impact your decision-making process by creating certain feelings.

According to another expert in the field, American-Portuguese neuroscientist Dr. Antonio R. Damasio, the brain constantly needs to update its information on the body’s state in order to regulate the many processes that keep it alive. And, it needs to translate those emotions into actionable feelings. In an ever-changing environment, this is the only way an organism can survive.

For instance, when we feel threatened by something, the initial emotion is labeled “fear.” That fear, by means of hormones, results in the production of fight-or-flight responsive feelings, allowing our body to react quickly and appropriately for its own self-preservation. This emotional reaction happens suddenly and unconsciously. Then, usually after an extremely short period of time, we become aware of those changes. We become aware of them only after responsive hormones have entered our bloodstream and we experience them as a feeling of being frightened or perhaps inferior.

If something can influence your emotional state, it can influence your hormonal balance.

RELATED: The Pitch of Women’s Voices has Changed Over the Last Few Decades, Becoming More Masculine

Music and movies are being used as manipulation tools. People would be better off filtering out as much of this pop culture garbage as possible.

Goo hole singer Billie Eilish, notably known for wearing baggy clothes and acting like an effeminate black man, recently changed her mind about not wanting people to sexualize her after people sexualized her. She kinda liked it.

Insider:

The “Bad Guy” singer Billie Eilish said in a new interview that she wanted the option to show her body when she turned 18 — an about-face from her previous statements saying she purposefully wore baggy and oversize clothes to hide her body from would-be body shamers.

“I’m gonna be a woman. I wanna show my body,” Eilish told Elle.

“What if I wanna make a video where I wanna look desirable?“

It’s good that this woman finally decided to be a woman after acting like a gamer for most of her public life.

But the damage’s already done.

Eilish had previously said she didn’t like to wear form-fitting clothes for fear of getting body-shamed or sexualized.

“That’s why I wear big, baggy clothes,” she said in a Calvin Klein ad earlier this year. “Nobody can have an opinion, because they haven’t seen what’s underneath.”

In fact, a photo of Eilish wearing a form-fitting white tank top caused an uproar on Twitter in June after numerous users sexualized the 17-year-old singer.

That “incident” is what made her realize that she — like every other goo hole ever in the history of goo — likes being “sexualized.”

She was photographed in public wearing a tank top, and the internet commented on her boobs.

billie eilish literally said she wears baggy clothes so she doesn’t get sexualized and the minute she shows some skin y’all sexualize her? gross https://t.co/JXbCz3fDKf

— 2019 Predictions (@2019_predicts) June 23, 2019

The fact that Billie Eilish is a child going to great lengths to hide her physical self from people to avoid being sexualized only to be sexualized the moment anyone sees her in something not reminiscent of a TENT makes me want to barehanded snap necks I'm just sayin

— Living Dead Squirrel (@The_GothDaddy) June 23, 2019

Now after having experienced that kind of attention, she realized that she likes that kind of attention.

After all, she has big boob DNA and it would be a shame not to show everyone her big boobs.

Elle:

Speaking of: Respect is an issue when it comes to the discussion of Eilish’s body. She physically yawns when the subject is raised. Her style—over-size shorts and shirts—is subject to memes. Feminists theorize that she’s desexualizing herself; parents thank her for covering up because, in turn, so do their daughters. “You’re missing the point!” she cries. “The point is not: Hey, let’s go slut-shame all these girls for not dressing like Billie Eilish. It makes me mad. I have to wear a big shirt for you not to feel uncomfortable about my boobs!” Before a show in Nashville in June, she climbed off the bus in a tank top to greet fans outside. Someone took a picture of her. “My boobs were trending on Twitter!” she shrieks. “At number one! What is that?! Every outlet wrote about my boobs!” She’s a minor, and even CNN wrote a story about Eilish’s boobs.

“I look good in it,” she says, laughing. “I was born with fucking boobs, bro. I was born with DNA that was gonna give me big-ass boobs.” She says her breasts have been an issue for as long as she can remember, which is why she covers them. “I was recently FaceTiming a close friend of mine who’s a dude, and I was wearing a tank top. He was like, ‘Ugh, put a shirt on!’ And I said, ‘I have a shirt on.’ Someone with smaller boobs could wear a tank top, and I could put on that exact tank top and get slut-shamed because my boobs are big. That is stupid. It’s the same shirt!”

It’s hilarious that people interpreted her wearing of baggy clothes as some kind of hijab thing, but what’s even more entertaining is her reaction to people liking her boobs.

From the interview, it’s clear that she was pretty excited about it.

Hard to blame her though. Women are addicted to attention, and she had lots of attention before showing her boobs, then suddenly got tons of additional attention dropped on her and she feasted on it like a pig. She didn’t know she could get even more attention so easily!

It’s also funny how all media outlets keep mentioning “she’s a minor” as if that meant anything. It certainly doesn’t mean anything for the “company” that she’s known to keep.

The famous tweet that sparked the whole thing.

So what’s the lesson here?

The lesson here is that praising women’s bodies, telling women that they’re pretty, and generally feeding them this kind of attention produces attention-junkies and sets them on a path of degeneration.

This isn’t something that can be really solved at the individual level because no matter how you treat your daughters and your wives, mistresses and girlfriends, society glorifies boobs and vaginas and through this glorification, it also poisons them.

But you can at least do better for yourself by not joining the worshipers.

UPDATE: 

Was really hoping she’d die or at least stay in a coma, but media is reporting the slut woke up.

Original article follows.

I usually keep up on pop culture. You know. It’s important to have your finger on the pulse of what the Jews are feeding the goyim when you do what I do.

I have no idea who this bitch is tho.

I sure hope she dies.

BBC:

Pop singer Demi Lovato is in a Los Angeles hospital after a suspected drug overdose, US media report.

The Los Angeles Police Department reportedly responded on Tuesday to a medical emergency in the Hollywood Hills, where Lovato lives.

TMZ reports the 25-year-old was found unconscious and treated at the scene with Naloxone, an anti-overdose medicine, after possibly taking heroin.

The Sorry Not Sorry singer was in a stable condition, US media report.

Lovato has struggled with substance abuse for years, and appeared to relapse in recent weeks.

Last month she cancelled her show at London’s O2 arena, announcing the news on Twitter hours before the concert was due to begin.

Sorry Not Sorry… have I heard this horrible song?

Wait hold on, there is this site called youtube.com I can check real quick.

HOLY SHIT.

That is satanic af.

Did not hear it before though.

Don’t watch it but just flip through – this is all a satanic ritual.

Oh.

She was a Disney girl.

Wikipedia:

Demetria Devonne Lovato (/ləˈvɑːtoʊ/ lə-VAH-toh; born August 20, 1992) is an American singer, songwriter and actress. After appearing on the children’s television series Barney & Friends as a child, she received her breakthrough role as Mitchie Torres in the Disney Channel television film Camp Rock (2008) and its sequel Camp Rock 2: The Final Jam (2010).

Disney kikes do satanic-pedo rituals on the children who work for them as child actresses and then as adults they make satanic music videos to brainwash masses of goy children.

Anyway, fingers crossed the bitch doesn’t wake up.

And that this is the last tweet she is able to make to her 56.2 million followers (Trump has 53.3, for reference there), poisoning the minds of our kids with satanic nigger sex kikery.

Oh hi 😘 Guess who’s on @BeatShazamFOX tonight at 8/7c? pic.twitter.com/53v6PPb4oh

— Demi Lovato (@ddlovato) July 24, 2018

The evidence is mounting for a pop music/Satanic witchcraft connection.

Andrew recently mentioned how much of modern pop music seems to be designed as part of some kind of Satanic mind-control program.

This is a legitimate line of enquiry. Not only is the music itself demonic, consisting of droning beats stimulating our lowest, most animalistic urges, but the performers are also into all kinds of weird shit.

We already know that Madonna is some kind of evil wizard.

And Lady Gaga is… I don’t even know what she’s supposed to be.

Possessed by a demon lord?

Many of these pop stars are into this “spirit cooking” type shit as well.

Marina Abramovic is friends with Lady Gaga, and they do weird blood rituals together.

So would it be any surprise that Spice Girls singer Victoria Beckham is now selling occult pants?

More importantly, do these boost DPS or movement speed?

Page Six:

Pop star-turned-designer Victoria Beckham is so fascinated by the healing powers of crystals, she included them in her new pre-fall collection.

Healing crystals?

Is this Final Fantasy, or something?

Everyone knows the best crystals are for ice magic. Come on.

“We clipped crystals onto belt loops, and included secret pockets for them on wide leg trousers — so you can carry charms wherever you go,” Beckham told Elle.

She’s also offering jewelry featuring mystical stones like White Howlite (“a calming gemstone that relieves stress, calms the mind, and relaxes the whole body”) and Tiger’s Eye (“it fuels courage, strength and will help you achieve your dreams”), priced from $165 to $480 a pop.

Oh, so she’s actually socketing crystals into equipable items. So it’s more of a Diablo-type deal going on here.

Well, I mean, you’re not going to spit on those extra elemental resistances.

Beckham — who told the publication her initial interest in crystal therapy resulted from “years of reading, plus recommendations from friends” — added that in addition to incorporating the healing stones into her outfits, she usually keeps a stash in her bag, too.

Years of reading, huh?

What dark, ancient tomes did she study to conjure up these enchanted accouterments?

In any case, why is it that all these people behind pop music are obsessed with Satanism and occultism? Is it really possible that there’s no connection there?

Music itself has long been known to have a quasi-magical effect on people, in that it affects their minds and changes their behavior, based on rhythm and harmony.

The ancient Greek philosopher, mystic and mathematician Pythagoras was obsessed with this, and played music constantly for his students, using different scales depending on the type of activity they were engaged in.

These ideas were carried on forward through the middle ages, all the way to the modern world.

With recording technology, the concept of using music to influence the behaviors of large masses of people became possible.

Pretty much all of pop started using lascivious rhythms as the Jews gained control over the music production industry, under the guise that this was meant for “dancing.”

Well, White people used to dance to this kind of music:

This is a baroque gigue.

Notice the much faster speed and flowing rhythm, in 3/4 time typical of older European dancing styles.

Listening to this brings up a happy, relaxed mood, and inspires modest and dignified dancing.

Meanwhile, the disco-type beats that modern pop universally feature bring tension and inspire sexualized, animalistic types of dancing – in the manner of African savages.

…

Whether or not it’s a satanic/jew conspiracy, the result is the same – the destruction of traditional European culture, to be replaced with African pelvis gyrations and porno music videos.

He is the “Chair” of something – the Pool, to be exact.

His name is “Adam Bloom.”

I would assume he’s Jewish, no?

They tend to be in Chairs of things, they tend to be named “Bloom,” and they tend to look like this.

So, I wouldn’t be surprised if this is a majority Jewish neighborhood.

However, his Jewishness is not relevant here.

WRAL:

A white man who challenged a black family’s use of a gated pool in a North Carolina neighborhood has not only resigned from the homeowner’s association board — he’s also lost his job.

Sonoco announced Friday that Adam Bloom is no longer employed by the packaging and industrial products company, saying it doesn’t condone discrimination of any kind, even if it happens outside its workplace.

A video posted by Jasmine Abhulimen on Facebook on July 4, seen more than 4 million times, shows what happened after Bloom questioned whether she was allowed to bring her son to the pool in the Winston-Salem neighborhood.

Definitely does not look like she belongs in a pool in a gated neighborhood.

Once again: racial profiling is simply pattern recognition, which is a basic psychological function of all mammals.

Interestingly, it is also a fundamental function of machine learning… so AI is going to be racist. That is the big problem they are having.

Remember Google recognizing those chimps as gorillas?

They only way they were able to stop the AI from labeling black people as gorillas was to remove gorillas from their pattern recognition system.

I don’t know how they’ll be able to stop AI from doing these things in the future.

Bloom also called the police. In a police recording released Friday, Bloom is heard calmly telling a dispatcher he’s dealing with a “nonresident that’s at the pool who refuses to leave. … We’re just asking for a form of identification.”

But Bloom was wrong about his neighbor: Abhulimen owns a house with her husband a few blocks away in the development, according to county property records.

In the video, Bloom, Abhulimen and the responding officers all speak in measured tones. She accuses him of singling out her and her young son as African-Americans by asking to see her ID. Bloom, who served as chairman of the Glenridge community’s private pool, responds that he asks pool users to see their identification “a couple times” each week.

Officers then determined that Abhulimen did in fact have keycard access to the gated pool. An officer apologized to her. When Abhulimen asked Bloom for an apology, he walked away.

Yeah, Jew or not – alpha move.

Fuck that nigger and fuck her house – she’s obviously African rather than a Basketball American, so her husband probably made his fortune on 419 scams.

The hell else would he get the money?

On Facebook, Abhulimen accused Bloom of racial profiling: “This is a classic case of racial profiling in my half a million $$ neighborhood pool. This happened to me and my baby today. What a shame!!” A police news release noted that the postings were on the page of Jasmine Edwards, which is Abhulimen’s Facebook screen name.

The social media backlash was fierce, and soon targeted Bloom’s employer. In a Twitter post , South Carolina-based Sonoco apologized to Abhulimen and said the situation doesn’t reflect company values.

Their company values is to allow niggers at pool?

Do they know they can’t swim?

Are their company values that niggers should drown? 

What sort of hardcore KKK company is this? Not even I want niggers to drown… necessarily…

“We are aware of a terrible incident involving the actions of one of our employees outside the workplace,” the statement said, adding that the “employee is no longer employed by the company in any respect.”

Company spokesman Brian Risinger confirmed that Bloom’s separation was “effective immediately.” Risinger said Bloom was a business development manager who had been with Sonoco for about five years.

Here’s his info:

You can call him and be like “give that kike his job back – he was just trying to save niggers from drowning!”

An attorney for Bloom said his client has taken his wife and children away from their home in the city, about 100 miles (160 kilometers) west of Raleigh, to a safe location after receiving death threats. Lawyer John Vermitsky issued a statement Friday saying his client feels terrible and didn’t intend to discriminate.

Bloom was performing his duties as pool chairman after another woman approached Bloom questioning whether Abhulimen had the right to be poolside, Vermitsky said.

Jew gets Jew lawyer – he’ll probably get a settlement from the company that fired him so he won’t have to work for 3-5 years. But he will never get his Pool Chair back.

Never again.

This is yet another instance of the media doxing and hounding an ostensibly white normie for doing something normal. This is a campaign to destroy any resistance to anti-racism by just randomly destroying the lives of randos who can be framed as “racists.” It is intended to keep everyone on edge, all the time.

This is a new thing, but they are pushing it hard.

Just recently:

• This Woman is Mad AF and She’s Not Going to Take It Anymore
• Permit Patty Resigns as CEO of Weed Company After Calling Cops on Disgusting Nigger Street Hustler
• NYC: BASED Jew Lawyer Lays Down the LAW on Filthy Spics

It is clearly a strategy that the media is engaging in in an organized manner.

None of these stories are real stories – sometimes people get mad and yell at other people, sometimes people ask people for IDs because they look like they don’t belong in a place.

This “smite the rando” technique is a Hail Mary to attempt to hold together the politically correct order which a certain President of the United States of America has taken a wrecking ball to.

Btw speaking of that – since it’s the weekend I’m going to go on a ramble about some crazy shit that you don’t know if I actually genuinely believe or am just trying to fuck with your brain with.

Miley Cyrus’ Wrecking Ball was 50,000,000x better than any single Adele, Rihanna or Avicci song – and yet, it is no longer played, while Adele, Rihanna and Avicci songs from the same time period (2012-14) are played on a loop everywhere you go everywhere in the world.

I’m not saying Wrecking Ball was some great song – I hate pop music.

But it is better than the other stuff, and it is no longer played.

Why?

Well, probably because there are a select number of songs that have satanic driving beats which are serving as psycho-emotional drivers for the entire society.

Don’t let the bad optics thumbnail deceive you – it’s pure satanism.

There are also a lot of Taylor Swift, Kanye and Justin Bieber songs from that period that are no longer played.

The big three that I’ve noted are those mentioned: Adele, Rihanna and Avicci.

There are others – oh, Beyonce. Big one, that big bitch. She is like some ancient voodoo ass goddess.

Same thing with Nicki Minaj.

This is some ancient African ass magic. All this big ass shit – pure satanism.

OH AND THE BIGGEST ONE OF ALL: Lady Gaga. They are looping her songs from ten years ago still, and she is openly involved in Jewish satanism.

Now let’s just…

Yeah. Knew it.

Total ass fixation at all her shows.

In all her photo shoots.

Even had her ass naked at an awards show.

Someone needs to go through and do a study on which pop hits get get played the longest – in particular, I am interested in pop songs that are 5-6 years old and still being played on a loop in every public place. I guarantee you will find a pattern that is linked to some kind of satanic driving messages – and has a lot of gigantic asses. That it does not relate in any way to the initial popularity of the song.

It is clear that there are songs that are not great at all that are still played on loop everywhere for some reason.

Avicci killing himself by slitting his throat with a broken bottle certainly plays into the theory that he was a part of a satanic mind-altering conspiracy.

Just saying.

Something to think about.

The other day I told a friend that I hate Bruno Mars pretty much worse than anyone else.

I hate all of these people, but I don’t really get triggered when I see or hear for example Jay-Z. I think “oh, there’s that monkeyman again, lol.” But Bruno Mars – this guy puts me in a rage.

And my friend said “yeah you know why, that nigga isn’t even black – he’s a Filipino.”

And I was like “nuh uh” – always I had just assumed Mars was a mulatto. Plus he has kinky hair which is not typical of Filipinos, who have strait Asian hair.

So I looked at the Wikipedia:

His father is of half Puerto Rican and half Ashkenazi Jewish descent (from Ukraine and Hungary), and is originally from Brooklyn, New York. His mother emigrated from the Philippines to Hawaii as a child, and was of Filipino, and some Spanish, ancestry.

That’s right friends – a Filipino kike.

You may also not be aware that the other key disgusting rat, the singer from Maroon 5, is also Jew.

Adam Levine.

So yeah – give me monkeyman Jay-Z any day over these kikes.

Because gorillas are much preferable to rats.

Ministry has always been one of those sponsor friendly politically correct metal bands that gets played on MTV.

The decision of these shark-jumping Gen X has-beens to release a music video calling on communists to commit acts of terrorism is apparently an attempt to make being an over-sensitive and hysterical snowflake “cool.”

It’s not resonating, the video’s negative reviews outnumber the positive 4 to 1. Young people see right through this big business pro-globalist revolution-chic propaganda.

Fuck off, trendies!

Digging deeper we can see what the root of the problem is: the multi-national German corporate record label Nuclear Blast. Its owner, Markus Staiger, is personally very active in pro-Merkel regime, pro-immigration Antifa paramilitary activity. They keep their neighbors and community in line with beatings, job termination and stalking crime-thinkers.

Antifas in Germany take it upon themselves to monitor their fellow citizens criticizing immigration and then report them to the police state. How revolutionary! Staiger is quite proud to be part of this movement.

If you’re familiar with the metal scene at all, you know that Nuclear Blast is often cited as one of the big forces in introducing SJW/J-left ideology in that field of creative musical expression.

What’s left of the metal crowd doesn’t like it, but without the money and power the Judeo-Left interlopers have behind them, they are helpless minnows being swallowed up by the poz machine.

Metal music has gone from being counter-cultural to a safe fashion statement espousing the same politics as Lady Gaga.

NB is more or less a monopoly in what has rapidly declined into a niche market. If you want to make a living playing music you better loudly signal in favor of their shitty politics and stay quiet about your own. On their band page, you will see they own all the big “sellout” pop-metal bands across the rock music spectrum: Cradle of Filth, Dimmu Borgir, Lamb of God, Nightwish, Sabaton, Testament, even Slayer.

With basically every famous metal band that’s still together being at the whims of some Antifa asshole, expect this stifling and unpopular conformity masquerading as rebellion to snuff out the last breaths of a metal genre already gasping for oxygen.

Goycott all the bands that do business with Nuclear Blast.

At the end of the day, the young white men these businessmen hate are the main cash cow for any metal music enterprise. Don’t go to any concerts or buy any merchandise released by these anti-white corporate Antifas.

If like me, you’re frequently subjected to commercial radio, or worse still, BBC Radio 1, then it’s extremely likely that you’ve also been subjected to the wobbly warbler known simply as ”Adele”. Last year Adele was the third highest earning pop star on the planet raking in a cool $85 Million, Alt-Right icon Taylor Swift was number one with a boy-band number two. The fact that Taylor took the top slot is a sign that not all is lost, it tells us that there’s still a vast market for white beauty and a, in theory, traditional, gentle conservatism.

So, okay, fine, but why is Adele so popular? what is it she’s selling and why are so many(#not all!) western, white, women connecting with it?

Adele has found a rich vein, female heartache, loneliness, despair and anxiety, and she mines that vein relentlessly. Adele’s songs are all constructed similarly, initial pain and hurt moving into a crescendo of power ballad laden agony, and you too will feel that agony as your teeth shatter to the power of her vocals.

Take for example, one of her most popular hits ”Set fire to the rain”:

And if that’s not depressing enough, one of Adele’s more recent hits ”Hello”,  edging toward 2 Billion(!) views on YouTube, features an African man as Adele’s ex. Meaning that topping off all of Adele’s other sorrows, she is now what some people might call a ”Mudshark”.

But diversity box-ticking aside, there’s obviously a massive market for Adele’s female orientated misery, most of whom will be white females.

As one online news outlet explains:

SINGING sensation Adele is back with a bang with new single ‘Hello’, which has been warmly welcomed by women who enjoy sitting alone with some wine and their own tears.
The new album, which the singer described as a ‘make up album’ rather than a break up album, had left fans worried it would contain next to no suitable songs for crying to after having too many glasses of wine.

“I was a bit worried, but once I heard ‘Hello’ I was bawling after about 30 seconds, and that’s without touching any alcohol or thinking of my prick of an ex,” confirmed huge Adele fan Alannah Higgins.
Many ardent Adele lovers have cancelled any plans they may have had for this Friday evening, favouring instead to surround themselves with thoughts of mistakes, tough break ups, failed relationships, and a glass of Savignon Blanc while playing ‘Hello’ on repeat.

“I’ve waited for this song for a good few months now, so I’ve a build up of sorrowful thoughts, and I popped round to Lidl last night and bought a couple of bottles after hearing the song would be released this morning,” explained serial Adele listener Mary Hughes.

Quite.

It could of course be argued that Adele is simply filling the cultural niche which was occupied by Celine Dion or Whitney Houston a generation ago, that of the howling diva. And while there’s certainly some truth to that, Celine Dion’s most famous hit ‘‘My Heart Will Go On” which featured in the Titanic movie, was actually a rather sweet love song about two people who genuinely love each other but have become separated from one another in a physical sense.  Celine longs for the day her man will travel back across the ocean to embrace her once again.

In 2017 Adele’s brand of power sadness makes Celine Dion’s bittersweet romantic ditties seem incredibly mawkish, sentimental and old fashioned. Adele’s music depicts an emotional wasteland inhabited by the humped and dumped, the finished via Facebook messenger and text, the cheated on, abused and betrayed wandering the broken heart dystopia of revenge porn and dating sites. It’s the chart topping pop song equivalent to Mad Max 2.

The more pertinent question to ask is not ”why is Adele so popular?” but rather, ”why does the well of female gloom run so deep?”.

After all, hasn’t ”The Modern Woman” got it all?. The modern white woman in Europe or North America, today, inhabits a culture and society which places hardly any restrictions on her behaviour at all! and yet alcoholism in women is at an all time high, women are beset with mental health issues: 20% of women in Britain are clinically depressed, they’re on pills for their nerves, pills for their insomnia, pills for their ADHD, it’s a veritable boom time for the pharmaceutical market.

One report in The Daily Mail claims:

In what has become the ‘dark side of equality’, their drinking habits now resemble those of men, according to the study by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.One in five woman graduates regularly drink ‘hazardously’ compared with one in ten for those with lower levels of education.

The Jewish led Feminist movement threw European women into the world of men while proclaiming ”You are free now! we have freed you from oppression, be happy!”. It’s similar to snatching a swan from its lake and ”liberating” it by dumping it in the middle of an arid desert. The swan wanders the void and ponders ”I’m free, but I’m unhappy, why?”.

The overly dramatic tone and bombast of Adele’s songs offer something of an ”out” to this confusion. Adele’s message is not just one of being used and thrown away like trash, it’s also one of stoicism, she’s saying/screaming ”Yes, it’s tough, but you will become stronger for it, you’re a strong woman! you will get through this!”.

But this isn’t really a solution, it gives succour to atomized women individually, but does nothing to address the wider problem of our women being thoroughly miserable and borderline mad in post-modernity.

Almost all pop culture does this, unless it’s a liberal cause celebre, such as inviting Muslims to live with us by the million, pop culture will zoom in at the individual level, not the group.

So each woman, individually, believes she’s in her own personal struggle and all will be well in the end, but when we zoom out and look at this as a group issue we see millions of women thinking the exact same thing. However, pop cultural icons cannot address these issues because once they begin to comment on wider societal problems they become ”political” and the solutions to this particular problem do not belong within the ”liberal” zone of thought and our masters are more than happy to sell out European women to a life of dead eyed promiscuity and loneliness as long as they stay true in their roles of indentured servitude to the Money Power.

As a genre the ”Power Ballad” is an interesting one, even though most of the songs are crap, because it points to a romanticism, it’s attempting to elevate the mundane into something more grandiose.

Every girl can be a princess and prince charming is always on his way with a magic kiss.

A few decades ago Julie, the girl from the supermarket checkout, would have the Eurythmics ”Miracle of Love” as her personal soundtrack to her ”courtship” with Dave, the local mechanic. The mundane became something more, the cheeky infatuation at the local pub became something epic, love, to be loved and have somebody love you back, the sheer wonder of it all!.

Adele inverts this and hands it back to the women of the current year. Grandiosity is used to conceal and elevate the humdrum lives of modern women, but the reality is that Julie is pulling up her knickers and heading out to catch the bus before Dave kicks her out, because he’s set to play Call Of Duty 7 Online later. And the ”lovemaking” was not much more than skinny-jeans wearing, Nu-Male Dave, trying to get Julie to agree to all the stuff he saw on the Jewish run porn channels.

Two bottles of wine and Adele’s new album is the solution, then Julie is no longer running for the bus to Sunderland in stained tights, she’s defiantly walking through rain in Manhattan, in slow-motion and expensively filmed black and white cinematography. Dave is a stubbly hunk driving off in an Aston Martin.

It was a grand drama played out between two strong and independent people…except it wasn’t.

Adele isn’t enough for our women, neither is the wine or the pills. It’s often pointed out that white women are the most vociferous opponents of our movement, of traditionalism and Nationalism, but, as Donald Trump said to the blacks, the question must be asked:

”What do you have to lose?”

Taylor Swift is being lambasted for her new music video, Wildest Dreams, commentators and journalists accusing her of racism.

NPR:

Taylor Swift is dressed as a colonial-era woman on African soil. With just a few exceptions, the cast in the video — the actors playing her boyfriend and a movie director and his staff — all appear to be white.

We are shocked to think that in 2015, Taylor Swift, her record label and her video production group would think it was OK to film a video that presents a glamorous version of the white colonial fantasy of Africa. But it still stings.

It goes on:

Here are some facts for Swift and her team: Colonialism was neither romantic nor beautiful. It was exploitative and brutal. The legacy of colonialism still lives quite loudly to this day. Scholars have argued that poor economic performance, weak property rights and tribal tensions across the continent can be traced to colonial strategies. So can other woes. In a place full of devastation and lawlessness, diseases spread like wildfire, conflict breaks out and dictators grab power.

Excuses, excuses. Meanwhile in Singapore and Hong Kong, which were also colonised, things look rather more like this and the same scholars presumably have rather less to say.

Taylor Swift has been the target of scorn for several years with feminists taking offence, apparently, at her positioning as a “good girl” who writes simple, heterosexual love songs that have mentioned virginity in a positive way.

It’s been printed on T-shirts and postcards and throw pillows: “Well-behaved women seldom make history.” Taylor Swift’s Grammy threatens to refute this. I don’t care about her personal choices, but her image of being good and pure plays right into how much the patriarchy fetishizes virginity, loves purity, and celebrates women who know their place as delicate flowers.

Today though Swift cuts a different image having officially “quit” country music last year and now with Jew/new best friends, arch-feminists Lena Dunham and Lorde, in tow she is saying things like “Misogyny is ingrained in people from the time they are born” and “So to me, feminism is probably the most important movement that you could embrace, because it’s just basically another word for equality.”

So all must surely be well for Swift now that she joined the feminist club, right? Right? Well, no. The attacks have only been getting worse and more vicious because the world of feminism has moved on from its goal of demonising White men and encouraging women to sleep around and never settle down to have children – fourth-wave feminism has arrived and it’s here to broadcast the message that Whites are evil and that White women should “Shut the fuck up” because they are “oppressors”. Unfortunately as time and history has shown, women are much more easily manipulated than men and this brainwashing has taken on a particularly brutal nature.

“People of colour” otherwise known as the Coalition of Aggressive Non-Whites Against White People, coming out with more and more of this stuff as they grow in number and confidence is unsurprising but what is so damaging is that third-wave feminism, already a subversive force that’s bad for White women – turning them against White men via poisonous ideas like “rape culture”, and putting them off having families – is quickly being superseded by fourth-wave, the goal of which seems to be entirely to teach White women that they are evil, their entire history and culture is evil and that they must now to be a “proper feminist” spend their entire lives apologising and grovelling to “people of colour” and campaigning against themselves and White men.

Women as “Defenders of the Status Quo”

It’s easy to say “Ha, well feminists have been hating on men for ages, it’s great to see them get a taste of their own medicine,” but the whole point of feminism from the beginning seems to be separation of White women from White men. It’s not just women who are hating their fellow Whites – look at MGTOW, most of the “Manosphere”. These sites acknowledge biological differences and that women are more easily led but also incite hatred towards White women, despite the fact they have been so Jewed up they have no idea what they are doing. Right up until the 1990s women were the essential part of the Conservative Party’s electorate – they voted Conservative in far larger numbers than men did and were far more socially conservative. They were protectors of the family unit under the fickle and easily controlled system of “democracy” until the Frankfurt School and their followers decided that family life was “hate”.

Third-Wave Feminism and the Demonisation of White Men

After CIA-funded and Bilderberg-backed second-wave feminism transformed women into good little worker bees for the elite, third-wave feminism was extremely useful to White genocide in a number of key ways. This wave of feminism is the one that has muddied the concept of consent to that where any White male having sex with women in danger. While White men are obviously the main victims in this state of affairs, impressionable White women are also negatively affected as many obviously have come to genuinely believe, via vile brainwashing, that consensual sex can have been a terrible “rape”. This is why university students are now having “consent classes” where they are told that engaging in sexual activities after one glass of wine can be “rape”.

Why is all this happening? Is it because, as many men-oriented websites say, women are just evil and vindictive? Or is it because Whites need to be picked of as Whites, not as men? It also implanted the key idea that the only reason there are more men in certain jobs than women as down to “sexism” and “male privilege”. This meme that humans are just programmable bipeds and any difference is down to “culture” will prove useful later.

A Case Study

Firstly I am going to show what “rape” typically is in the media, and that its third-wave form is often largely in feminists’ minds, having been transplanted there by… oh, whichever kind souls just have our women’s welfare in their minds, obviously. Then I am going to show the ramifications of what happens to a White man after he acquiesces to the request of a woman to “lick her out” – after that I will look at the British feminist response to a genuine attempted rape.

First, the “rape”. The woman in question was “couchsurfing” in his house, and the man was depressed after losing his job, his girlfriend etc. But then…

Vagenda Magazine:

His attempt at seducing me in his bedroom worked. I did feel that I wanted to have sex with him. He told me we should go to my room because his room was opposite his parents. He suggested a cup of tea. I agreed.

He brought tea to my bedroom. I sat on the bed and he sat on the chair. I let him close the door. I let him undress me. I didn’t want to kiss him, but eventually I let him. I liked the feeling of being touched at the beginning. He examined every inch of my body, studying me like some kind of specimen. He touched me but I didn’t touch him back. He told me to, to show him some kind of love. Anything. I felt sorry for him. I told him I couldn’t love him and he said that he didn’t want my love anymore, or to have a relationship with me. He just wanted me. Maybe just my body. He told me to close me eyes, and he continued to touch me. I said it didn’t feel right anymore, and I tried to push him away. Not too forcefully though because I was afraid. I was completely dependant (sic) on him. I was in his family’s home. I didn’t know how to get to the nearest town. His family spoke only Spanish. He touched me. Then he turned me around onto me knees and stomach. I told him to stop, repeatedly. He didn’t.

It sounded like he was crying. I lay very still afterwards. I asked him why he didn’t stop and he said that it was too late. I said that was bullshit. He laughed. He said that was the first time he heard me swear. He tried to touch me again and I pulled away from him. I got up and had a shower. When I came back into the room he was dressed and remaking the bed meticulously. I had never seen a bed being made so perfectly, despite the stain on the sheets. I watched him as I put fresh clothes on. He had folded the clothes he removed from me and placed them in a neat pile on the table. He was a perfectionist. After he made the bed he went to have a shower. I turned the light off and got into bed. I didn’t know what had just happened. I felt physically disgusted, like I was a piece of meat.

This was an article from a feminist magazine in the UK and exemplifies what is considered an “acceptable” rape story in today’s narrative. This sort of story fills up magazines, blogs and newspapers as an example of a typical rape, convincing millions of girls and women who have had sex and then changed their mind/not been sure about it that they have been raped. This builds distrust between White men and White women as obviously Pakistani communities etc pay no attention to this sort of thing.

A high profile instance was the constant media coverage of Emma “Mattress Girl” Sulkowicz’ “rape”, by a German man. Half Chinese, half Jewish Emma has been featured in glossy magazines, the New York Times and been celebrated for her “brave” performance art piece of carrying a mattress round campus to express her disgust at her university having failed to expel the German. The wheels came off the outrage bus as it was exposed as a likely hoax given that Sulkowicz had repeatedly contacted her “attacker” in friendly and flirty terms for months and months after the alleged attack yet because the story fit the narrative of Evil White Rapist, the media is still running with it even after the wheels have fallen off the bus, as VDare reports.

A footballer, Ched Evans, was pretty much scared and threatened off ever playing football again. What he had done was extremely degenerate, but then the prevailing culture is extremely degenerate. A White woman had been “picked up”, in a kebab shop, by other footballers and proceeded to have sex with them. There were also black footballers involved (who got off, despite the fact she accused them of rape, too). Anyway, she requested that this Ched Evans character perform oral sex on her and he did, she asked he have sex with her and he did.

Now obviously all of this is a less than ideal situation and before White culture was subverted by, again, people who have our best interest at heart :^) especially the interests of women, it would have been unthinkable but anyway, in the world where it happened, people campaigned long and hard to ensure Che Evans never played football again. Celebrities lined up to have the team he’d previously played for lambasted, teams which tried to sign him after he’d served his prison sentence were bombarded with calls and emails and protests until no one would dare touch him.

At the same time we have Ione Wells, who was nearly raped outside her home by a dindu.
Ione bravely spoke out about her ordeal. I say “bravely” not because speaking out against rape is a brave thing in this day and age, as “rape” when it comes to campaigning nowadays seems to refer to white, working class men so much as wolf-whistling at a girl, but because hers was definitively the wrong sort of rapist.

Her attacker was a 17-year-old Somalian and the attack went like this:

When you were caught on CCTV following me through my own neighbourhood from the Tube, when you waited until I was on my own street to approach me, when you clapped your hand around my face until I could not breathe, when you pushed me to my knees until my face bled, when I wrestled with your hand just enough so that I could scream. When you dragged me by my hair, and when you smashed my head against the pavement and told me to stop screaming for help, when my neighbour saw you from her window and shouted at you and you looked her in the eye and carried on kicking me in the back and neck. When you tore my bra in half from the sheer force you grabbed my breast, when you didn’t reach once for my belongings because you wanted my body, when you failed to have my body because all my neighbours and family came out, and you saw them face-to-face. When CCTV caught you running from your attempted assault on me… and then following another woman twenty minutes later from the same tube station before you were arrested on suspicion. When I was in the police station until 5am while you were four floors below me in custody, when I had to hand over my clothes and photographs of the marks and cuts on my naked body to forensic teams – did you ever think of the people in your life?

This is from an open letter to her attempted rapist which “went viral”, as they say. What is most tragic about the letter is its naivety and that it exposes in full the fact that here in the West people genuinely believe everyone is born equal and that everyone is the same. As is put pretty well here, Black people do not have the same feelings as White people and whatever our moral educators and betters (:^)) in the West have led White people to believe, ethnocentrism is completely normal outside of the West while Whites are the only people who came to develop much of a conscience for those not in any traditional “in-group”.

She continues:

I don’t know who the people in your life are. I don’t know anything about you. But I do know this: you did not just attack me that night. I am a daughter, I am a friend, I am a girlfriend, I am a pupil, I am a cousin, I am a niece, I am a neighbour, I am the employee who served everyone down the road coffee in the café under the railway. All the people who form those relations to me make up my community, and you assaulted every single one of them. You violated the truth that I will never cease to fight for, and which all of those people represent – that there are infinitely more good people in the world than bad.

Because of the lies of Boas, Gould et al about human biodiversity, and due to naive White universalism Wells spouts tragic paragraphs like the above, thinking Black people are the same as her and that they see everyone as an equal.

Jane Kelly wrote about Wells’ attack in the Spectator, pointing out that in the 1980s she had had a Black try to strangle her before attempting rape and that she had been “saved by locals” (read: White people). She said she’d made the mistake, when writing an article about her attack, of mentioning the assailant’s race and said that the left, at the time, had blamed her for her assault and accused her of “racist body language”. Thus she said she understood why Wells wrote a letter which avoided any allusion to her attacker’s background, and also pointed out that the BBC and none of the national papers had done this either. For all anyone knew, Ione’s rapist was another Ched Evans – one of the evil Whites the press never tires of highlighting and warning about. Anyway her campaign which was “hashtagged” #NotGuilty didn’t really gain anywhere near the attention of any of the campaigns against Evans. No one criticised the Somali youth, talked about “cultural” problems like they do with White men nor anything else.

One problem when trying to get through to White women who have been infected by feminism, and men (though they are fewer), is that they have been weaned on “privilege theory”, by the likes of Jew Noel Ignatiev, which is that it that those supposedly with more power should defer for people supposedly with less power. It is also why when a Black person says “Whites are evil”, someone calling him a racist doesn’t work for the brainwashed. Because racism is prejudice + power and therefore can only be done by Whites. And merely mentioning Jews means you’re a Nazi, so that’s a non-starter.

A brainwashed White woman went to Haiti and was, predictably, raped by a Black man and proceeded to blame his actions on “White patriarchy”.

“Rape” is obsessed about in feminism not for the sake of women but entirely to demonise White men. Monstrous, violent stranger rapes, which are far more characteristic of some types of non-White men, are airbrushed out of the narrative by the media, their actors and victims inconvenient. Meanwhile “rape culture” is shouted about from the rooftops of every university, magazine, blog and newspaper as a huge threat to women, women who have had drunk sex and regretful sex encouraged to feel as much resentment as possible, feminists convincing them that they are victims of a terrible crime they must feel angry and upset about. If they cared about women at all then the spotlight would be on keeping safe from violent stranger rapists, but it’s not about women it’s about White people.

Fourth-Wave Feminism and the Outright Assault on White People

What we are seeing now is that feminism has moved from the Jew-controlled sphere of stopping White people from breeding with White people (although this is very much in place with the transgender lobby which pumps White children with sterilising hormones) and is now controlled by a coalition of hostile anti-Whites drunk on Jew-juice that Whites are evil and to blame for everything. That Jews have lost control is evident from that Jew feminists are being criticised as if they were the evil Whites (these goys never heard of the Holocaust??!?!!), shown in the massive criticism of the likes of Lena Dunham, for not packing her TV show Girls with negroes, but the result is certainly no better, though.

“Privilege theory”, or that the only reason there are more men in certain plum jobs than women is down to discrimination, has worked its wonders so that White feminists are easily tricked into thinking that the reason they earn more than men “who could be brothers of Trayvon” is because of evil White racism. much as with White men it was supposedly down to sexism.

Rowan Blanchard, some sort of tween actress aged 13 with “Middle Eastern and Northern European ancestry”, “spoke out” on Instagram about “White feminism” and talked about how White women are oppressing Black women and trans “women”.

A website typical of this sort of feminism, which is the prevalent sort to be found now among under 20s and the ever-growing non-White component within this age group, is Everyday Feminism.

One particularly heinous article says that White women in relationships with non-White men are “oppressing” them. While this is great in that the fewer White women who are consorting with non-White men, the better, it all adds to the creeping narrative that Whites are worthless whilst non-Whites are blameless victims. What must warm the cockles of the hearts of girls gang-raped and threatened with death by married Pakistanis is paragraphs like:

It’s important to remember that as a white person being sexual with a person of color, you’re in a position of power. The fact that you’re intimate with one another doesn’t erase that. And it can be difficult for a marginalized person to feel comfortable expressing their needs without a safe space being intentionally created by the person of privilege. I’ve written (okay, tweeted) before about how this plays out even in sexual encounters where only a power imbalance exists on the axis of gender. The issue is this: The power dynamics bestowed upon us by our fucked up, oppressive society don’t disappear just because you’re intimate with someone.

See, the real problem with the girls who were victims of Pakistani rape gangs in Telford, Rochdale, Rotherham, Oxford and everywhere else where Pakis are allowed to congregate near White women, is that our society is not a safe space in which they can express their needs. In fact, if these diverse and enriching gentlemen were to tell the truth about their much-deserved sexual needs,there are people in the disgusting and unbearable Whiteness of our society who might question, with hate speech reminiscent of Hitler himself probably, these men’s right to freely access White girls’ vaginas against their will.

The website is also packed with the sort of Social Justice Warrior who makes me particularly angry – East Asian women. There is a ridiculous piece by one of these women about “6 Reasons We Need to Dismantle the Model Minority Myth of ‘Those Hard-Working Asians.'” The piece, of course, does nothing to dismantle anything but instead says that this stereotype is a “tool of White supremacy” and that Asians and Blacks need to work together to defeat Whites. I can’t work out whether these Asian women are stupid or just evil to write these pieces in terms of whether or not they realise that if “White supremacy” is earning more than another group and being arrested yet then “Asian supremacy” is clearly more than a thing. But they think that because some weeaboos fancy them that this is “oppression.”

To bring this back to Taylor Swift, this website also has an article entitled “5 Ways Taylor Swift Exemplifies White Feminism – And Why That’s a Problem.” The problem, of course, is that Taylor Swift is White and this fact makes her “problematic”. White women need to be led away from feminism, and fast, because feminism is an anti-White movement that is destroying us from inside and out and they are not even trying to hide it anymore. And they should be reminded that, when Whites are gone, so is the altruism so many White women are driven by and love so much.