For some reason I was thinking about Madonna’s “Material Girl” the other day.

Oh, I remember – I said what Zelensky was doing to Western countries is exactly like this song.

The song is really fantastic, on every level, like several synth pop songs from the mid-80s (this song was released two months before I was born).

You could’t sing these lyrics now. I can tell you that much.

Some boys kiss me, some boys hug me
I think they’re okay
If they don’t give me proper credit, I just walk away
They can beg and they can plead
But they can’t see the light (That’s right)
‘Cause the boy with the cold hard cash is always Mister Right

‘Cause we are living in a material world
And I am a material girl
You know that we are living in a material world
And I am a material girl

Some boys romance, some boys slow dance
That’s all right with me
If they can’t raise my interest, then I have to let them be
Some boys try and some boys lie
But I don’t let them play (No way)
Only boys that save their pennies make my rainy day

‘Cause we are living in a material world
And I am a material girl
You know that we are living in a material world
And I am a material girl
Living in a material world
And I am a material girl
You know that we are living in a material world
And I am a material girl

Living in a material world (Material)
Living in a material world
Living in a material world (Material)
Living in a material world

Boys may come and boys may go
And that’s all right, you see
Experience has made me rich and now they’re after me

‘Cause everybody’s living in a material world
And I am a material girl
You know that we are living in a material world
And I am a material girl
Living in a material world
And I am a material girl
You know that we are living in a material world

It’s basically giving away the entire game of the female sex.

It was of course written by a man, Peter Brown.

No woman would ever give the game away like that in song lyrics. They would, however, sing them for money without even considering the significance.

No Jew executive would sign off on something like this in the current year. If he did, he’d end up getting treated like Harvey Weinstein.

Of course, you don’t need that song to know what women are actually like inside. And you don’t need me to tell you anything.

Everything about the way the world works is free to see from observation.

The nature of man, and the Nature of Good and Evil, was written on your soul before you were even conceived. You have an absolute in-born ability to judge this world – and everything in it – exactly how it is.

No one is stopping you from just looking at it. It’s very obvious.

There is a person stopping you: you.

You stop yourself from looking at things the way they really are because it hurts.

It hurts, man.

It hurts worse than anything.

Our Lord told us “pick up your Cross.”

What do you think he was talking about?

What is the Cross in this metaphor?

It’s the truth.

It’s heavy.

Thank you @POTUS @PCAHgov https://t.co/saam6UjmMX

— Lady Gaga (@ladygaga) April 13, 2023

It seems pretty logical to put a satanist in charge of satanic arts.

I mean, it follows logically.

New York Post:

Lady Gaga is a woman of many talents. She’s a Grammy- and Oscar-winning singer, an actress, a philanthropist — and now she’s bringing her talents to the White House.

The White House announced Thursday that President Joe Biden will appoint Lady Gaga, 37, as co-chair of the President’s Committee on the Arts and the Humanities along with Oscar-winning producer Bruce Cohen.

Members of the committee include Jon Batiste, Constance M. Carroll, George Clooney, Philip J. Deloria, M. Angélica Garcia, Jennifer Garner, Nora Halpern, Steve Israel, Marta Kauffman, Ricky Kirshner, Troy Kotsur, Katie McGrath, Laura Penn, Amanda Phingbodhipakkiya, Arnold Rampersad, Shonda Rhimes, Kimberly Richter Shirley, Horacio Sierra, Anna Deavere Smith, Joe Walsh, Kerry Washington and Pauline Yu.

Cool Satan.

Really cool American Satan.

What is that, you ask?

It is failed actress Megan Fox, 35, and failed musician Machine Gun Kelly, who are making up for their professional failure in a satanic performance art display at the recent Billboard Music Awards.

It is also the closest you’re going to get to heterosexuality in American popular culture in 2021: the ultimate bimbo plastic surgery slut and the drugged out tattooed skinny freak.

Note that they are not wearing masks and are at a public event. The event was held at the – wait for it – Microsoft Theater in Los Angeles. Attendees were required to show proof of vaccination, and only the celebrities were allowed to go maskless.

The Microsoft Theater is the ugliest building you’ve ever seen in your life – a literal blight upon the land.

The sponsor of this event, which you can see on the signs behind these two freaks, was Security Benefit – a Jewish banking operation run by the infamous Guggenheim family.

Billboard itself is of course run by the Jews.

This is who is controlling and organizing our cultural icons. These icons are what drives the masses of people. They copy what they see. Megan Fox and Machine Gun Kelly are serving the role that ancient gods served before they were replaced by Christian Saints.

The masses of people will always follow whatever is put out as the example of normal culture.

From ancient tribal times up until the last century, the ruling elite felt a need to give positive role models to the people. Now, of course, the elite are Jews – and you see the role models they give you.

Megan Fox was married for ten years after dating the same man since she was 18.

She had three kids with him.

She broke the marriage off last year, due I’m sure to boredom, and started dating this tattoo freak druggie.

Where are her kids?

Who knows!

She was actually quite cute before her weird and very bad plastic surgery.

She also promotes lesbianism.

This is what is happening: everyone is being bullied into becoming a homosexual. Those who do not become homosexuals have role models like Megan and Machine Gun.

Everything is getting very dark.

Popular music is a psychological operation. In fact, pop culture in general is a psychological operation.  New research shows that music and movies affect people’s emotional states.

Study Finds:

Music can evoke a wide variety of different emotions in listeners. While some songs put a smile on our faces all day, other can bring us to tears in seconds! So, can your brain’s reaction to music reveal what kind of tunes you’re listening to? A new study finds researchers can actually tell if a person is hearing happy or sad music based on the activity going on in certain regions of the brain.

A team from the University of Turku in Finland examined 102 participants listening to music while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging, or an fMRI. Using machine learning algorithms to map the brain, researchers located which areas light up when exposed to different emotion-inducing songs.

“Based on the activation of the auditory and motor cortex, we were able to accurately predict whether the research subject was listening to happy or sad music. The auditory cortex processes the acoustic elements of music, such as rhythm and melody. Activation of the motor cortex, then again, may be related to the fact that music inspires feelings of movement in the listeners even when they are listening to music while holding still in an MRI machine,” explains postdoctoral researcher Vesa Putkinen in a university release.

The Finnish team also discovered which brain areas are active while watching various films that bring forth strong emotions. They tested if these regions are the same ones which are stimulated by music. The results suggest that what you see and what you hear actually spark different mechanisms in the brain when it comes to emotions.

“Films, for instance, activate the deeper parts of the brain that regulate emotions in real-life situations. Listening to music did not strongly activate these regions nor did their activation separate the music-induced emotions from each other,” Putkinen reports. “This may be due to the fact that films can more realistically copy the real-life events that evoke emotions and thus activate the innate emotion mechanisms. As for the music-induced emotions, they are based on the acoustic characteristics of music and colored by cultural influences and personal history.”

Considering that Jews are behind most popular music and movies, the implications of this are pretty grim.

When people listen to music and watch movies or TV series, they’re giving the keys to their emotional state to whoever or whatever created the media they’re allowing into their mind.

Emotions affect decisions.

From a May 9, 2018 Forbes article:

According to Herbert Simon, American Nobel Laureate scientist, “In order to have anything like a complete theory of human rationality, we have to understand what role emotion plays in it.”

As Dr. Simon and others have pointed out, emotions influence, skew or sometimes completely determine the outcome of a large number of decisions we are confronted with in a day. Therefore, it behooves all of us who want to make the best, most objective decisions to know all we can about emotions and their effect on our decision-making.

But, just in case you’re not sold on what I and Dr. Simon say, and you continue to believe you can make decisions free of emotional bias, let’s look at how emotions are formed and how they are transformed into actionable feelings.

First, every feeling begins with an external stimulus, whether it’s what someone said or a physical event. That stimulus generates an unfelt emotion in the brain, which causes the body to produce responsive hormones. These hormones enter the bloodstream and create feelings, sometimes negative and sometimes positive.

So, to review, it’s stimuli, then emotions, then hormones and, finally, feelings. In other words, your emotions impact your decision-making process by creating certain feelings.

According to another expert in the field, American-Portuguese neuroscientist Dr. Antonio R. Damasio, the brain constantly needs to update its information on the body’s state in order to regulate the many processes that keep it alive. And, it needs to translate those emotions into actionable feelings. In an ever-changing environment, this is the only way an organism can survive.

For instance, when we feel threatened by something, the initial emotion is labeled “fear.” That fear, by means of hormones, results in the production of fight-or-flight responsive feelings, allowing our body to react quickly and appropriately for its own self-preservation. This emotional reaction happens suddenly and unconsciously. Then, usually after an extremely short period of time, we become aware of those changes. We become aware of them only after responsive hormones have entered our bloodstream and we experience them as a feeling of being frightened or perhaps inferior.

If something can influence your emotional state, it can influence your hormonal balance.

RELATED: The Pitch of Women’s Voices has Changed Over the Last Few Decades, Becoming More Masculine

Music and movies are being used as manipulation tools. People would be better off filtering out as much of this pop culture garbage as possible.

Footballer David Beckham and short-time pop star Victoria Adams married nearly 20 years ago, and have raised a family in public view.

The tattoos are cringe, but that is basically “white man tries to stay cool among nigger culture in current year.”

They have certainly both stayed fit and attractive.

They are the closest thing to a “noble” model of a family that currently exists as an acceptable part of mainstream popular culture.

There’s Tom Brady’s family, but he’s generally called a Nazi just for being a white Christian male who supports the President. Barely acceptable in the mainstream.

Furthermore, Brady has a bastard son from a previous relationship, and didn’t marry Gisele until she was 26 and had already had a series of high-profile boyfriend relationships.

But yeah, Tom Brady would be the close second for “wholesome pop culture family.”

Both couples are sportsman/model combos, which present the best of the male and female, aesthetically.

In the future, this type of a family will not be acceptable. It will not be allowed for such families to be featured in tabloids, or gossiped about in a positive way.

Now is the Age of Meghan Markle AKA “Return to the Planet of the Apes.”

The world is investing in this trend, and modern pop stars are picking up on it.

Paki Wife? You Betcha!

The irrelevant former pop star Nick Jonas is making big waves in the tabloids, having just married a Paki.

The ambitious bastard actually had the wedding in India and dressed up in the costume…!

That bitch is also ten years older than him.

When I started seeing all of these stories, I remembered him as being from the Disney boy band “Jonas Brothers,” which I remembered having been parodied on South Park.

Her I did not know, and had to look up. She is an actual “from India” paki – seeing her pictures, I had just assumed she was British-born. She is a local celebrity in that country. So this marriage is an international publicity stunt, which is why you are seeing all of these stories about a vaguely remembered American Disney singer from a decade ago marrying an Indian bitch you’ve never heard of: the marriage itself is the tabloid product.

The Daily Mail tabloid sidebar is all interracial stuff and nigger shenanigans.

Nb4 Justin Bieber

Justin Bieber did just have a high profile marriage to a white girl.

And aside from his obscene tattoos, they’re a handsome couple.

He’s a Christian and said after the marriage that he was going to attempt to devote his life to being more like Christ.

But this isn’t going to work out. Justin Bieber, though a proper Aryan Anti-Semite and nigger-hater, is also a total kook who ends up in complete disaster situations constantly. The tabloids are covering this because it is a disaster waiting to happen.

His wife Hailey is the daughter of Stephen Baldwin.

So the niece of fake Donald Trump.

I understand that famous people people prefer to marry one another, generally, for what are probably self-explanatory reasons – I personally would only be interested in marrying another e-celeb – but marrying into this family was real dumb.

There is absolutely zero chance that these two are going to maintain a decades-long healthy public marriage with kids in the way that the Beckhams did.

I’m predicting total fallout of that marriage pretty rapidly. Also calling it right now: after they break up, Hailey will start dating some person of color.

MTV, 1990

MTV, 2018

There was a time, at some point before the industrial revolution, when entertainment was actually an art, and people actually had to be creative or inspired to become popular.

This is just no longer the case. At this stage of history, the art of appealing to the public has been pretty much gamed out and everything is already figured out. This began to happen years ago, mostly guided by enterprising Jews looking to apply Jewish psychological theories to mass communication, to convince the goy consumer class to buy whatever the goy producer class wanted sold to them.

Read this book, big-brain goys.

Now that we have A/B testing and decades and decades of data from trial and error in mass communications, there just isn’t much room left for guesswork in entertainment, especially in TV and double-especially in movies, which are expensive to produce and so very expensive to screw up.

This is basically why movies have genres, and almost any movie you can see follows a plot that you have already seen in the last ten movies you saw. It would be risking a lot of money to make something new, and it’s considered safer to just make the same thing, over and over, because the data is already in.

Using their great powers of Science, our Jewish TV oligarchs have objectively derived the formula for appealing to the American public, which is about 56% white and about half conservative:

“Annoy the shit out of them, insult them to their faces, and remind of them about politics.”

Brilliant.

Fox News:

While presenting at the 2018 MTV Video Music Awards, Kevin Hart told the audience they were “allowed to kneel,” seemingly referencing how NFL players have been protesting during the national anthem before games.

“[In] this game you’re allowed to kneel,” Hart said while presenting with fellow comedian Tiffany Haddish.

He continued: “You can do whatever you want, there’s no old white men to stop you.”

Hart, 39, also said the award show was like “a typical day at the White House.”

“Beefs pop off, bad language, people run to the bathroom and send out crazy tweets,” Hart said. “It’s basically like a typical day at the White House. In your face Trump, suck it.”

…

Rapper Logic donned a shirt that read “F— the wall” while singing his song “One Day” with Ryan Tedder. The 28-year-old singer was joined on stage by immigrant leaders, parents and children, all wearing T-shirts that read “We are all human beings,” in protest of the Trump administration’s family separation and detention policy.

Genius.

According to several anonymous sources with the Council of the Learned Elders of Zion, the original script was to just broadcast two hours of actors, dressed up like Donald Trump, being held in stockades and flagellated during the entire performance by black trannies, while chanting “racists! racists! racists!” on loudspeaker.

However, upon careful consideration, they decided that this might have the unintended effect of making mainstream entertainment completely toxic to about half of the country. They concluded that, not only would this script risk driving their prospective white audience directly into the hands of alternative outlets like the one you’re reading right now, and thereby widen the rapidly growing cultural divide in the West by tearing down any remaining cultural artifacts that everyone could rally around, but they also figured that they would lose a crap-ton of money, by alienating the whites that still form the majority of the television viewing audience in their still majority white country, and who still represent the overwhelming majority of people who even have money to spend on whatever they run ads for.

So, they went with this neutral script instead, aiming for universal appeal and ratings.

The results, of course, were spectacular.

Hollywood Reporter:

For the second straight year, the MTV Video Music Awards drew its smallest audience ever.

Monday’s show drew 2.25 million viewers and a 1.1 rating among adults 18-49. Across eight Viacom-owned channels, it drew 4.87 million viewers and a 2.2 in the demo; both sets of numbers fall short of the 2017 VMAs, which set the previous low.

Just to put this into perspective, the Daily Stormer jumped from 2,700,000 to 3,000,000 people last month (plus God only knows how many people connect through Tor), with English adding 250,000 readers and Spanish adding 50,000. We will continue to grow beyond that. Given these trajectories, we will probably be more widely consumed in a month than the MTV Video Music Awards, by this time next year.

The awards also aired on a ninth Viacom network, TV Land, for which numbers weren’t immediately available. It is highly unlikely, however, that enough people tuned in there to push the VMAs past their 2017 on-air total of 5.36 million viewers and 2.6 rating in adults 18-49.

The 2017 awards also aired opposite a huge Game of Thrones finale on HBO; the heaviest head-to-head competition on cable Monday was WWE Monday Night Raw on USA (1.1 in 18-49, 3.1 million viewers) and an NFL preseason game on ESPN (0.8, 2.66 million).

The MTV-only airing is down 15 percent in viewers and 21 percent in adults 18-49 versus 2017. The simulcast is off about 9 percent in viewers and 15 percent in the demo.

The VMAs suffered even steeper declines among MTV’s core viewership of teens and young adults. In the 18-34 demo, the show’s 1.2 rating fell by almost half — 47 percent, to be precise — from 2.2 a year ago. It declined by similar percentages in the 12-34 cohort.

So, I guess the fact that they have any viewership at all is just because of their legacy audience – which is also falling off – but in the demographic of people who are actually at the age to be interested in this sort of stuff, they basically lost half.

Has their Science! failed them?

I mean, okay – maybe, in retrospect, this was not a good a model for entertaining white people:

I think it’s pretty entertaining though, to be honest.

But, it’s political entertainment.

It’s not clear why they have chosen to abandon their legacy product – music celebrity entertainment – and venture off into political entertainment. Some people just want to forget about the real world for a while, and I don’t blame them. For those who don’t, there are a lot of outfits that are working that niche very well, so maybe it didn’t make sense to try to spoof CNN’s product, instead of just doing music. Bill Maher is genuinely higher quality “fuck white people” entertainment, for people who are into that.

If mainstream pop culture wasn’t spontaneously self-destructing, I would be plotting every day to destroy it, so as to create a cultural vaccum that we could move on in. But, they’re just going full suicide.

That just leaves me with one less thing to plot, which is great.

The Daily Stormer, as a news model, basically relies on white people being subject to constant racial abuse, both by real social conditions – mass immigration, gibs, etc – and by the mainstream media. If they ever stopped doing that, our message would stop being relevant, and so our readership would crumble.

So, on behalf of the Daily Stormer – Thank you, MTV. Thank you. We thrive on this shit.

At least the music is still appealing though, right?

Camila Cabello won video of the year honors at the VMAs for “Havana,” and Jennifer Lopez received the Video Vanguard Award.

I mean, who doesn’t like listening about white women doing sexual tourism with negros in Cuba?

Or, I guess she’s actually Cuban, so she’s singing about just doing non-tourism bestiality in Cuba, and then coming to the United States for some reason?

This gross song about coal-burning and illegal immigration actually has 1,278,000,000 hits on Youtube, so I guess people are still listening to the product itself, even if MTV, the meta-product, has become too insufferable.

This is basically all marketing and almost none of the product itself.

The product itself obviously sucks. “The story of casual sex between a negro and a latinx in a communist hermit country island” is not a product with huge mainstream appeal. As far as the purely music content of this product is concerned, the vocals actually sound virtuosic once they come out of autotune, and yeah, sure – it’s catchy.

But, let’s be real.

Anyone could spoof this style easily. The sound (except for the cringe ebonic rapping) is actually good, but it’s also exactly the same actually good sound as the last ten songs. Its popularity is basically a testament to how many people will listen to a song just because they are aware that it exists, or they already heard it on commercial radio and it got stuck in their head, or everyone else is listening to it.

Why aren’t we making our own music?

What am I even supposed to listen to? Taylor Swift?

She is basically content-neutral.

The Internet just memed her as a literal nazi because it had literally no one else.

She’s a woman, ffs.

Singing is one of the few jobs that are appropriate for a woman to do, but a female singer can never be anyone’s “voice of a generation.” 

A woman is not qualified to speak for a generation of men.

Women are not even qualified to speak in public about most subjects.

Any man who “gets it” could make catchy pop songs about modern white male issues.

You could sing about how women are cheating sluts and there isn’t enough wife material to go around. You could sing about being a minimum wage wagecuck who can’t get a real job like his boomer dad.

You could sing about your simultaneous feelings of generational resentment, and generational inadequacy, because your generation has more faggotry and slutting than the boomers ever did, and that despite the civilizational crisis that the boomers wished into being and neglected, most young men are still worse people than their own fathers, and you know it, and it hurts to know it, but you know it anyway.

You could sing about how your brother had no future, went to jail and overdosed on heroin, or about how your sister got forced into prostitution (implicity by moslems). You could just sing about how you don’t even recognize the place you grew up in, and you feel no connection to your own people.

These are the real, personal issues that define our generation.

The left would hate it, but they wouldn’t be able to do anything about it, because the message, while white and male, would be strictly implicit and so appropriate for mainstream consumption. People would listen to that. Someone could literally reach ‘voice of a generation’ tier with that,

These would resonate with real people on a personal level.

Yet, no one is singing about these issues.

And, don’t even tell me “but country music.” And don’t make me explain why country music is not a valid response to this problem. Go defend pop-rock + meme accents somewhere else.

Also, please do not think that this would have to be slow, depressing, faggy emo music. Anyone could literally just take the catchy pop music style everyone is listening to, and make the words be about something more appealing than burning coal and being an illegal immigrant.

There is obviously a huge, unsatisfied demand for this sort of material.

Do I have to do everything myself?

I just don’t have time. There is only one (1) of me, and there are literally a couple dozen things I could each individually dedicate my entire life to doing, which respond to some huge, unsatisfied demand, but which no one is doing. Apparently, everyone is literally retarded and unable to imagine new useful things, or literally soulless and just gives no fucks about anything.

I guess people who immediately need money work jobs instead of working on creative projects, and people who don’t immediately need money just play vidya or something until they need money.

We do have fashwave, sure.

I guess. Firstly, it’s self-castrating in that it is “literally fascist lol,” which works on the internet, but not in street protests, and also not in music that can be widely popular, because all successful music is personal, not political – even successful political music is only successful because it is also personal.

Aside from the messaging fail, fashwave is  “literally trying to resurrect electronic music as a medium for our ideas.”

This is not a winning model. Purely electronic music has never been really mainstream, because people prefer the personality and emotion of a human voice with a human story.

This will never change.

Fashwave is a dead end in our quest to get our ideas into mainstream culture.

And, look – I’m not trying to say that fashwave isn’t good or that I don’t like it, but what I like is just not a solid measure of what most people will like.

I’m also not trying to say that people making fashwave shouldn’t keep making it.

Some content needs to be made for reasons other than clickbaiting an ADHD public which will chuckle, forget about it, and back to business as normal.

I love you, public. Really.

Mercy on all of you.

Some content needs to be made for a small cohort of people who will deeply appreciate it and improve their own human condition as a consequence.

If it were not for Anglin content like that, if the insight here hadn’t been useful to me personally, I wouldn’t even care enough about this site enough to write for it.

I have literally neglected months of making money, just to write a book which will never be widely popular because I don’t write romance / crime / fantasy novels, not because anyone will ever read it, but simply because it deserves to exist on its own merit.

I am only telling you this so that you understand that I have no high horse to ride on here. When I say that fashwave is, by design, a failure for mass consumption, I myself am consciously guilty of this, and I am guilty of it presently, and I will continue to be guilty of this in the future.

So, yeah – I understand.

We try not to do infighting on the Daily Stormer. You literally have to get arrested for a domestic dispute involving banging your mother-in-law to get a polite disavowal around these parts. If there is ever a time to pick at our own ranks, the Master Chief would have to take the lead on it, and not I, a staff writer, so I’m definitely not looking to take a strong lead on that front.

I will say this, though – the post-election saga of the “alt-right” was basically a cleansing fire that weeded out “people with effective models” from “people with ineffective models,” and I take absolutely no joy in seeing “people with ineffective models” going down with their ships, when they could just figure out that what they are trying to do has basically crippled its own growth potential with inherent design flaws which could be remedied by just objectively comparing them to the models of more successful things.

I don’t write this to hurt feelings, but I feel like it should be said at least once, in case someone reading this is actually thinking of producing content.

If you want to make something successful, imitate what is already successful.

For example, if someone wanted to do radio, they could just look around, find something that is already successful, critically evaluate its core elements, and copy what is useful.

Alex Jones, for example, does successful radio. He has, like, 18.88 million monthly visits.

Yes, that is the exact number. Since Alex Jones has been deplatformed, his most recently statistics are literally praising Hitler. You can figure out what that means if you believe in coincidence – I don’t.

Just how pop songs are a proven, successful model that could be spoofed with the backing of objective evidence, his radio program is also that. You could just cut the ads, change the script to be racist, sexist, homophobic, etc, and keep the red meat of what makes his program work – one guy, high energy, getting PISSED OFF, and producing and marketing soundbytes that can be sold as stand-alone one-bit pieces (no one is listening to your three hour radio program dude, sorry “Alex,” it’s just too long, we have jobs and families, no one has time for that) and throw in a healthy dose of Jesus, America, the Bible, the Constitution, Monster Trucks, The 2nd Amendment, health advice, add women advice, etc.

You know – stuff people are objectively proven to like through prior experience.

Or, I mean, look – you could also just come up with your own idea for music, or your own idea for radio, and hope it works. It might work, if you have a good idea. Some people do have good ideas.

But, you know, some people don’t.

Most of my ideas are bad. I’m just lucky enough to usually discard them, sometimes with a little nudging from my friends, who I am eternally grateful for.

Some people just want an objectively guaranteed way to make popular content.

Like, for example, “physical rallies and protests as a path to mass popularity” IE “pre-charlottesville alt-right” is something that, as far as I know, has never worked – not just for white nationalist politics, but for anyone looking for popularity in any venue. I don’t think doing physical venues has even worked for musicians as an efficient path to popularity, as opposed to just selling records or getting on the radio.

Even for political campaigns, physical venues have mostly just been useful to give the image of mass popularity to consumers of digital media. Like, how many of you have been to a Trump Rally, and how many of you haven’t, but you’ve seen one on TV, or Youtube, or whatever?

Yeah, that’s what I thought.

So, retrospectively, “I’m gonna make it big if I do 200 concerts” just isn’t gonna work. The failed protest scene experiment was not “a necessary growing pain for the alt-right,” sorry, but it was literally something whose failure could have been predicted in advance by comparing it to literally anyone who had tried that model, using evidence, and logic.

And there are other guys, now, who are doing things now that will not work, or will not work as well as they should, based on these same, objectively measurable principles of collective past experience, evidence, and logic.

So, please, guys:

We need our own culture.

I can’t do it all myself.

If you are creative, please just spoof things that are proven to work, and maintain all the elements that make them work, with only those modifications necessary to make them suited to white males, and do A/B testing of models.

Or, whatever – you could also not do this, and run with a model that has never worked, for reasons unrelated to how white nationalist it is. I’ve been there too. I get it.

Like, I’m not even in the business to tell anyone how to do their stuff.

If you’re trying to “revive music for white people” or “revive electronic music,” I guess that depends on your own goals. Just, be clear to yourself about what you’re trying to accomplish.

And, look – this is just what I think, and I’m an anonymous guy on the internet, and I love all of you guys, even the ones who go “literally full MTV” in terms of useful models, and fail to reach even half of their potential due to innate flaws in their model.

But, I would love you a lot more if you would please start winning.

I want you to win.

So, now you all know what I think about content creation.

Do whatever.

Even the most die hard of Star Wars fans are not liking the latest Star Wars movie.

A few years back, Jew-run Disney purchased LucasFilm and with it the rights to produce new Star Wars movies. The franchise, once an important part of American pop culture, has been left in ruins thanks to Disney.

This process began with Star Wars: The Force Awakens which inserted all sorts of multiculturalism and social justice warrior narratives into the plot. This was not a surprise considering that the film was directed by the Jew J.J. Abrams. The bad guys were mostly all White males and the good guys were mostly a mix of women and non-Whites. Han Solo, one of the few White male good guy characters from the original trilogy, was even killed off in the movie.

The Force Awakens was bad enough, but not bad enough to get the average Star Wars fan to raise a big fuss. Star Wars: The Last Jedi, the latest movie in the series, has been something entirely different. This film has been widely panned by audiences. Older fans who fondly remember the original films have been especially harsh in their reviews.

The scores from Rotten Tomatoes really paints the picture.

What’s interesting to note is the disparity between the “critics” and the audience. The “critics” gave it glowing reviews, whereas audience reviews were mixed. The Jew media is blaming online trolls for the difference, but much of the criticism has been perfectly legitimate. An overload of cringe worthy jokes, poor story telling and the elevation of unimportant characters over more interesting ones have been some of the most common complaints. The new film also continues shoving feminism and diversity down everyone’s throats.

PewDiePie reviewed it and he thought it sucked. He gave it a 3.5 out of 10. Many of the people commenting on his review have fully agreed with his analysis. Unlike the “critics,” he gave the film an honest review.

The Last Jedi is the culmination of the Jews at Disney trying to milk the Star Wars franchise for as many shekels as possible. Instead of taking their time to create a solid product, they’ve been rushing to shit out as many Star Wars movies as they can. This includes spin-off movies like Rogue One and the upcoming Han Solo film. The quality of these products has been of secondary concern. It couldn’t be any more obvious at this point.

Disney’s expectation is that people will rush out to see any film with the Star Wars branding no matter how awful it is. Even though they might be able to get away with this for a few more movies, they have killed the magic that made the original Star Wars films a cultural phenomenon. The backlash against The Last Jedi is proof of that.

Even though the film opened well, it is lagging behind the box office receipts of The Force Awakens. Merchandise sales are also lagging.

It is good that the Jews through their own greed have managed to ruin another cultural mainstay. We are slowly taking over the culture thanks to their incompetence.

If like me, you’re frequently subjected to commercial radio, or worse still, BBC Radio 1, then it’s extremely likely that you’ve also been subjected to the wobbly warbler known simply as ”Adele”. Last year Adele was the third highest earning pop star on the planet raking in a cool $85 Million, Alt-Right icon Taylor Swift was number one with a boy-band number two. The fact that Taylor took the top slot is a sign that not all is lost, it tells us that there’s still a vast market for white beauty and a, in theory, traditional, gentle conservatism.

So, okay, fine, but why is Adele so popular? what is it she’s selling and why are so many(#not all!) western, white, women connecting with it?

Adele has found a rich vein, female heartache, loneliness, despair and anxiety, and she mines that vein relentlessly. Adele’s songs are all constructed similarly, initial pain and hurt moving into a crescendo of power ballad laden agony, and you too will feel that agony as your teeth shatter to the power of her vocals.

Take for example, one of her most popular hits ”Set fire to the rain”:

And if that’s not depressing enough, one of Adele’s more recent hits ”Hello”,  edging toward 2 Billion(!) views on YouTube, features an African man as Adele’s ex. Meaning that topping off all of Adele’s other sorrows, she is now what some people might call a ”Mudshark”.

But diversity box-ticking aside, there’s obviously a massive market for Adele’s female orientated misery, most of whom will be white females.

As one online news outlet explains:

SINGING sensation Adele is back with a bang with new single ‘Hello’, which has been warmly welcomed by women who enjoy sitting alone with some wine and their own tears.
The new album, which the singer described as a ‘make up album’ rather than a break up album, had left fans worried it would contain next to no suitable songs for crying to after having too many glasses of wine.

“I was a bit worried, but once I heard ‘Hello’ I was bawling after about 30 seconds, and that’s without touching any alcohol or thinking of my prick of an ex,” confirmed huge Adele fan Alannah Higgins.
Many ardent Adele lovers have cancelled any plans they may have had for this Friday evening, favouring instead to surround themselves with thoughts of mistakes, tough break ups, failed relationships, and a glass of Savignon Blanc while playing ‘Hello’ on repeat.

“I’ve waited for this song for a good few months now, so I’ve a build up of sorrowful thoughts, and I popped round to Lidl last night and bought a couple of bottles after hearing the song would be released this morning,” explained serial Adele listener Mary Hughes.

Quite.

It could of course be argued that Adele is simply filling the cultural niche which was occupied by Celine Dion or Whitney Houston a generation ago, that of the howling diva. And while there’s certainly some truth to that, Celine Dion’s most famous hit ‘‘My Heart Will Go On” which featured in the Titanic movie, was actually a rather sweet love song about two people who genuinely love each other but have become separated from one another in a physical sense.  Celine longs for the day her man will travel back across the ocean to embrace her once again.

In 2017 Adele’s brand of power sadness makes Celine Dion’s bittersweet romantic ditties seem incredibly mawkish, sentimental and old fashioned. Adele’s music depicts an emotional wasteland inhabited by the humped and dumped, the finished via Facebook messenger and text, the cheated on, abused and betrayed wandering the broken heart dystopia of revenge porn and dating sites. It’s the chart topping pop song equivalent to Mad Max 2.

The more pertinent question to ask is not ”why is Adele so popular?” but rather, ”why does the well of female gloom run so deep?”.

After all, hasn’t ”The Modern Woman” got it all?. The modern white woman in Europe or North America, today, inhabits a culture and society which places hardly any restrictions on her behaviour at all! and yet alcoholism in women is at an all time high, women are beset with mental health issues: 20% of women in Britain are clinically depressed, they’re on pills for their nerves, pills for their insomnia, pills for their ADHD, it’s a veritable boom time for the pharmaceutical market.

One report in The Daily Mail claims:

In what has become the ‘dark side of equality’, their drinking habits now resemble those of men, according to the study by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.One in five woman graduates regularly drink ‘hazardously’ compared with one in ten for those with lower levels of education.

The Jewish led Feminist movement threw European women into the world of men while proclaiming ”You are free now! we have freed you from oppression, be happy!”. It’s similar to snatching a swan from its lake and ”liberating” it by dumping it in the middle of an arid desert. The swan wanders the void and ponders ”I’m free, but I’m unhappy, why?”.

The overly dramatic tone and bombast of Adele’s songs offer something of an ”out” to this confusion. Adele’s message is not just one of being used and thrown away like trash, it’s also one of stoicism, she’s saying/screaming ”Yes, it’s tough, but you will become stronger for it, you’re a strong woman! you will get through this!”.

But this isn’t really a solution, it gives succour to atomized women individually, but does nothing to address the wider problem of our women being thoroughly miserable and borderline mad in post-modernity.

Almost all pop culture does this, unless it’s a liberal cause celebre, such as inviting Muslims to live with us by the million, pop culture will zoom in at the individual level, not the group.

So each woman, individually, believes she’s in her own personal struggle and all will be well in the end, but when we zoom out and look at this as a group issue we see millions of women thinking the exact same thing. However, pop cultural icons cannot address these issues because once they begin to comment on wider societal problems they become ”political” and the solutions to this particular problem do not belong within the ”liberal” zone of thought and our masters are more than happy to sell out European women to a life of dead eyed promiscuity and loneliness as long as they stay true in their roles of indentured servitude to the Money Power.

As a genre the ”Power Ballad” is an interesting one, even though most of the songs are crap, because it points to a romanticism, it’s attempting to elevate the mundane into something more grandiose.

Every girl can be a princess and prince charming is always on his way with a magic kiss.

A few decades ago Julie, the girl from the supermarket checkout, would have the Eurythmics ”Miracle of Love” as her personal soundtrack to her ”courtship” with Dave, the local mechanic. The mundane became something more, the cheeky infatuation at the local pub became something epic, love, to be loved and have somebody love you back, the sheer wonder of it all!.

Adele inverts this and hands it back to the women of the current year. Grandiosity is used to conceal and elevate the humdrum lives of modern women, but the reality is that Julie is pulling up her knickers and heading out to catch the bus before Dave kicks her out, because he’s set to play Call Of Duty 7 Online later. And the ”lovemaking” was not much more than skinny-jeans wearing, Nu-Male Dave, trying to get Julie to agree to all the stuff he saw on the Jewish run porn channels.

Two bottles of wine and Adele’s new album is the solution, then Julie is no longer running for the bus to Sunderland in stained tights, she’s defiantly walking through rain in Manhattan, in slow-motion and expensively filmed black and white cinematography. Dave is a stubbly hunk driving off in an Aston Martin.

It was a grand drama played out between two strong and independent people…except it wasn’t.

Adele isn’t enough for our women, neither is the wine or the pills. It’s often pointed out that white women are the most vociferous opponents of our movement, of traditionalism and Nationalism, but, as Donald Trump said to the blacks, the question must be asked:

”What do you have to lose?”

There is a philosophical question: does art imitate life or does life imitate art?

The obvious answer to this question is “both.”

But here’s a brain-squeezer: what if an artistic scene and a real life scene happen simultaneously?

Well, it’s happened. And reality hasn’t collapsed in on itself. Yet.

On Sunday night, a new episode of The Walking Dead aired. It featured characters leading zombies away from a “camp” down a road.

The same day, drone footage was released, showing Slovenian military officers leading “migrants” away from a “camp” down a road. The scenes were indistinguishable.

The goal of the group in the TWD episode was to lead the zombies away from their town. The goal of the Slovenia military was to lead the migrants out of the country.

This is truly an incredible thing. The exact same day. Obviously, the show was filmed months earlier. Yet it’s airing coincided directly with this Slovenia footage.

Before season six of TWD ever aired, I did a satirical article about Calais images being from the show.

I showed pictures like this:

And joked:

We are getting clues here that much of season six will focus on a convoy of trucks, probably moving supplies into the safe-zone, which Rick has to secure – but what will Rick do when his convoy of supply trucks gets filled up with walkers???

Then – and I hadn’t known this – the first episode this season showed the zombies breaking through semi-trucks.

It really goes to show just how fitting a metaphor the zombie apocalypse is for the migrant crisis, and brown immigration to White countries more generally.

I would even go further and assert that it is more than coincidence that TWD and other zombie-oriented entertainment is so popular in this time of migrant invasion. I believe that this is a manifestation of the collective unconscious of the White man. Immigration is the defining issue of our age, so it is hardly a surprise that pop culture would be reflecting this.

We all know – consciously or unconsciously – that there is a darkness upon us. A creeping, evil force which has come to overwhelm and destroy us.

And as this evil progresses, the darkness will indeed swallow entire parts of the formerly White world. We must ensure that the entirety of civilization does not fall.

As our Jew-run society continues it’s decline, every area of life is becoming hyper-sexualized. Bawdy performances in revealing outfits are no longer reserved solely for MTV and similar venues, but have made their way into what was once high European culture. Opera star Danielle de Niese recently encouraged her fellow artists to “embrace their sexuality”, but at the same time bizarrely claimed that her actions are completely different from those of leading pop-slut Miley Cyrus. From the Daily Mail:

A leading opera star who is appearing on stage in a highly sexualised part has taken a swipe at Miley Cyrus for her provocative twerking.

Danielle de Niese said her appearance inFrancesco Cavalli’s bawdy opera La Calisto at the Bayerische Staatsoper in Munich, Germany, is an example of opera encouraging performers to embrace their sexuality.

But, when talking about the American singer’s dance at the MTV Music Video Awards, the soprano said it was an example of a singer using her sexuality for the wrong reasons.

In an interview with The Times, she said: ‘I have different reactions based on the way it is presented.

‘It’s tough [for Cyrus] because you have someone who’s desperately trying to artistically express herself and break free from the shell of her previous image that was curated for her by Disney when she was Hannah Montana.

‘To break free from that she’s felt that she needed to really go in the other direction.’

De Niese said her appearance on stage in a leopard-print leotard is different because she is portraying a wild character.