“So that poll, that Ann Selzer poll…”@EvanMcS: “Was wrong. The poll was wrong.” pic.twitter.com/dOZMQnRLjT

— CSPAN (@cspan) November 6, 2024

How would polling possibly be reliable? Just think about it. How many polls have you answered in your life? If some Indian or black woman did call you and started asking a bunch of questions and wanted them answered immediately, what would you do?

Because of the Indian scammers who constantly spam call American cellphones, no one ever answers unknown numbers anyway. What are these pollsters even doing?

You can read the data and they claim to just be calling random people. How could that ever portray public sentiment accurately?

Further, what is the point of the polls? Even if you believe voting is real in America, why would polls matter? Everyone is excited to know what others are thinking, but the only real agenda from the media in polling is to alter people’s views.

It was very obvious that Trump was going to win the overwhelming amount of votes in a real election, the only question was whether or not we would have a 2020/2022 situation where the Democrats used mail-in ballots to fake the election.

The Guardian:

US pollsters are under fire for the third presidential election running for failing to foresee Donald Trump’s emphatic ballot box triumph that will propel him back to the White House.

Having seriously underestimated Trump’s support in the 2016 and 2020 elections, polling agencies trumpeted a recalibrated methodology for 2024 that was meant to more realistically reflect his standing while restoring their own credibility.

Instead, pollsters are now being called on to explain a broad range of surveys that showed the two candidates essentially deadlocked both nationally and in battleground states in a race that was deemed too close to call.

Compounding the embarrassment, many polling experts in the final days before election day predicted a narrow electoral college victory for Kamala Harris, who was foreseen by some as just about eking a win in a majority of the seven swing states: Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona and Nevada.

In fact, Trump has won five of the states at the time of publication and was leading in Nevada and Arizona, which had yet to be called.

Frankly, I suspect there was massive mail-in ballot fraud but that Mossad agents went in and shut some of it down and also made sure that CNN and the New York Times would call the election for Trump on election night, instead of dragging it out and allowing for the Democrats to bring in more votes.

It’s not a real election system, regardless of the fact that the candidate with the most votes happened to win.

James Rosen brings up the issue of Biden's mental fitness. pic.twitter.com/b8conSnqW5

— Scott Whitlock (@ScottJW) January 19, 2022

Joe Biden finally took questions from journalists after however many months.

It didn’t really go very well.

James Rosen, a Jew from NewsMax, asked Joe Biden about a recent Politico poll showing that only 49% of voters agree with the statement “Joe Biden is mentally fit.”

A poll released this morning by Politico-Morning Consult found 49 percent of registered voters disagreeing with the statement “Joe #Biden is mentally fit” https://t.co/I0DfOfBGWs

— Picture Architect (@PictureArchitek) January 20, 2022

Conversely, only 40% of voters said that they believe Biden is mentally fit. So 11% don’t care to comment on that question.

When asked, The Biden laughed.

Then he said: “I have no idea.”

Not having any idea why people think he is not mentally fit does not sound like something a mentally fit person would say.

A mentally fit person would say: “you know, I’ve always struggled with speech impairment problems, I work a lot and don’t sleep much, and sometimes I make gaffes. But I assure you, when it comes to making decisions, I am 100% up to the task, and me and my team are doing a great job getting this country back to where it needs to be.

He was later asked about the fact that the majority are not happy with his job performance (he’s apparently at 33% approval), and he said “I don’t believe the polls.”

BIDEN: "I don't believe the polls."

(The polls show Biden's approval rating at 33 percent) pic.twitter.com/b4fK4yOz2s

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) January 19, 2022

Once again, it probably would have been better to not do the press conference at all.

But they said “in celebration of the end of his first year, Biden will take questions from journalists.”

I just want to repeat my talking point here: it doesn’t matter what the people think. At all. The Democrats have total control over all institutions of power, and they are going to use that power. They’re not going to surrender that power. They have every institution in the country backing them.

The only guy who doesn’t back them is that tech guy who said that the vax was a Jew depopulation agenda.

It's really disturbing that a CEO of a $1B tech company is believing and spewing *insane* Jewish conspiracy theories. https://t.co/ZvK9hB6hXK

— Arielle Shnaidman (@aShnaidman) January 5, 2022

But he’s out.

Every other major corporation supports the Democrat Party, they support the vax agenda.

The fact that only a third of the public supports him means nothing.

This is a democracy. It means you do what the government says, and you’re never allowed to make any decisions.

These were the Real Clear Politics polling averages in battleground states on November 2nd:

Those were corrected in the week before the election.

Quinnipiac was saying that Biden would win Florida by 5 points.

Trump won Florida with 51.2%.

That is very far outside of the margin of error.

The New York Times fake polls were actually absurd:

These people were just lying. They are not this incompetent. They were lying.

The media is involved in a criminal conspiracy to defraud the American people.

The rest of these polls were just as wrong, I can tell you that – they were inflated for the purpose of justifying the voter fraud you are currently witnessing.

UPDATE: 

Frank Luntz: Polling profession "done" after election misses: "Devastating to my industry" https://t.co/6H0lHUpl4M pic.twitter.com/uReLsRMhim

— The Hill (@thehill) November 4, 2020

CNN knows the polls are fake and are mainly there to explain away voter fraud.

However, CNN doesn’t want to get caught out like they did last time.

Michael Smerconish this week interviewed someone from Trafalgar, the only major polling company that predicted Donald Trump’s win in 2016, which is also predicting he will win again this week.

This way, if Trump does win, CNN can say, “oh well, we covered Trafalgar…”

There is no YouTube clip, but this week Smerconish also interviewed Harry Enten of FiveThirtyEight, and grilled him on how he was so wrong last time, and also questioned him about some of the apparent issues with this year’s polling (for one, the fact that different polls show sometimes double digit differences, which is outside the margin of error, meaning someone is definitely wrong).

Come to think of it, I haven’t seen anyone else on CNN doing this – so maybe it isn’t CNN covering their ass, and it’s just Smerconish covering his own ass.

We are clearly looking at a Trumpslide, and these people will pay the piper.

We’re all on edge here with a week left before the election.

We need to think positively. Don’t downplay the positive abilities of positive thinking.

The only reason we have to believe Trump won’t win is the polls. There is plenty of reason to believe the polls are totally and completely wrong.

Jonathan Jakubowski and Christos A. Makridis write for The Hill:

We predict that President Trump is going to win the 2020 presidential election — and win big.

While the majority of the polls suggest that Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden is leading, or at best that it’s close, those polls suffer from at least three problems.

First, the tone of the questions. There is significant evidence from behavioral psychology that suggests that the way a question is framed predetermines the range of potential answers. In fact, Gallup has found that respondents can answer very differently to questions with the same topic even in the same survey based on the language that’s used. And the use of metaphors can even dwarf the importance of pre-existing differences between Republicans and Democrats.

One of the reasons respondents do that is because of a tendency to give socially desirable answers, which was the case especially during the 2016 election. Most people don’t like confrontation, so the easiest, albeit not necessarily the best, solution is to avoid it. Right now, saying that you’re voting for Trump/Pence is often not the socially desirable answer. In fact, a recent poll by the Cato Institute suggests that nearly two-thirds of Americans say that the political climate is sufficiently harsh that they don’t want to give their genuine opinion about politics.

Second, the sample of respondents. Who responds depends on many factors, including the medium (e.g., landline versus cellphone), the location, the sample size and demographic factors. Moreover, the pool of respondents is not necessarily the same as the pool of likely voters. Even though election polls all contain a margin of error, that margin of error is unreliable if the underlying sample does not reflect the population. Researchers have also identified self-screening as the major contributing factor to the polling failures during the 2016 election cycle.

For example, distrust of pollsters also leads to lower response rates for Trump supporters. Rasmussen finds that 17 percent of likely U.S. voters who “strongly approve” of the job President Trump is doing say they are less likely to let others know how they intend to vote in the upcoming election. By comparison, only 8 percent of those who “strongly disapprove” of the president’s performance say the same.

While proper sampling methodology matters more than the size, having a representative sample with enough people still helps considerably. Robert Cahaly of the Trafalgar Group notes how their work to create minimum samples sizes of 1,000 voters, added to their work to doggedly pursue the “quiet Trump voter,” led to Trafalgar being one of the most successful battleground polling firms in the country in 2016. Cahaly explains that “we don’t do a state with less than a thousand. You see these polls, 400, 500, 600 people for a state. I don’t buy that. Your margin of error is far too high.”

Third, the content of the current news cycle. What’s going on in a particular moment in time can influence voter attitudes, particularly in swing states. For example, the recent revelation of Hunter Biden’s hidden emails on his laptop, coupled with the link to his father, has come at an opportune time for the president. Moreover, if the economic recovery continues, the good news may continue putting wind in Trump’s sails.

Admittedly, no poll is perfect. That’s why RealClearPolitics takes a step forward by “averaging out” these errors across polls. But “averaging out” only works when errors are made in both directions. Here, many polls make errors primarily in one direction, so the average will still reflect some of the biases that exist.

Their conclusion is: Trump win. Big Trump win.

Regarding all of the metrics outside of the polls, Scott Adams has some things to say about that.

Adams is a Trump cheerleader, but his analysis this morning of factors not related to polling showing a Trump win is worth consideration.

Trump is on a glide path to reelection, NXIVM update, Philly riots help Trump, Supreme Court, coffee https://t.co/bnoybI53BB

— Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) October 27, 2020

He went through a list of signs (starting at 11:30 in the above video) showing that the polls are the only indicator saying that Trump is not winning:

• Enthusiasm
• Signage
• Sitting president got more than 75% of primary votes
• Trump is in the same place in the polls as he was against Hillary
• He’s surging at the right time
• New voter registration is heavily Republican
• Trump’s ground game more aggressive
• Biden is going to the wrong states (Georgia), not many places
• High levels of black support for Trump
• Suburban mothers will like Amy Coney Barrett
• Incumbent advantage generally
• Democrats split on packing the Supreme Court
• Biden is decomposing – “Voting for Biden is like going into the woods at night for a hike with a flashlight with a dying battery” -Joe Rogan (paraphrased)

It is clear to me that Trump is going to win.

I don’t have any doubt about that, right now.

What is not clear to me is if he will remain in the White House after he wins.

That is much less obvious.

We know that the Democrats are planning major voter fraud using mail-in ballots.

How successful will that be?

No one knows.

It depends primarily on how hard Trump actually wins on election night. If he wins really hard, that will mean he can credibly claim victory, and the ball is then passed to Democrats to start complaining and hoaxing.

So: stay positive.

If Trump is overthrown, we’ll figure out a new plan.

His new slogan should be Make America America Again (MAAA for short, pronounced like the sound sheep make.)

It turns out that after all of the attacks on Trump supporters — after all of the people censored, fired, beaten and shot in the street for supporting their president — people may be reluctant to say they support Trump.

This shocking finding worries a team of Jewish researchers, because it would mean that Big Bad Orange could, theoretically, pull a Never Again 2016 again.

CloudResearch:

Lately, there’s been considerable debate over the accuracy of presidential polls. While recent polls show Joe Biden ahead, a number of pundits speculate that some Donald Trump supporters may be hesitant to share their true opinions when polled by phone. That hypothesis is gaining traction, leading some to argue that Trump may be leading despite what the latest numbers show. It’s also being fueled by the belief that 2020 will be a repeat of the 2016 election, when Trump polled poorly in advance of the election, but still went on to win the Electoral College vote.

Despite the current debate on whether there are segments of Trump (or Biden) backers reticent to express their true opinions in phone polls, there’s been little empirical investigation into if the phenomenon actually exists. Pundits on major broadcast and cable news networks, such as Fox News and CNN, continue to speculate on the potential impact of so-called “shy Trump voters” on the outcome of the November presidential election result.  In a recent article published in The New York Times, David Winston says the following:

“The idea that people lie, it’s an interesting theory, and it’s not like it’s completely off-the-wall. But it’s obviously a very complicated thing to try to prove because what do you do? Ask them, ‘Are you lying?’”

On its face, a poll that asks people whether they lie in phone polls may not make much sense. After all, why would a person who lies in a telephone poll tell the truth about that in a different online poll? We here at CloudResearch reasoned that the issue may be methodological.

To explore this issue, we structured our survey to overcome shortcomings of previous polls. Instead of simply asking voters whom they will vote for — and then ask whether they just lied — we centered our research around a general question: “Are you comfortable in truthfully disclosing the presidential candidate you intend to vote for in a telephone poll?” Our rationale for this approach was that there’s a major difference between admitting you just lied and admitting to being genuinely concerned about disclosing your preferred candidate.

For the most part, we expected to find very few “shy voters.” After all, telephone surveys are supposed to be anonymous, so why would people be reluctant to share their opinions? However, to the extent people said that they were reluctant to express their voting preferences on a telephone poll, we were interested in their rationale for their reluctance. As a result, we included open-ended follow-up questions to better understand the factors that drive voters to fudge their responses.

…

11.7% of Republicans say they would not report their true opinions about their preferred presidential candidate on telephone polls.

In contrast, just 5.4% of Democrats say they’d be reluctant to share their true voting intentions — roughly half the number of Republicans reluctant to tell the truth on phone polls.

10.5% of Independents fell into the “shy voter” category, just a percentage point lower than how Republicans react to phone polls.

After asking about people expressing their true opinions on telephone calls, we then inquired about their preferred candidate. This ordering was important as we did not want to fall into the same trap as other pollsters who tend to lead with preference declarations. When we broke the responses down based on current Trump vs Biden supporters, we found the following:

10.1% of Trump supporters said they were likely to be untruthful on phone surveys — double the number of Biden supporters (5.1%) reticent to share their true intentions.
When respondents indicated that they were untruthful during polls, we followed up to confirm those responses, and then inquired as to why “shy voters” are concerned about sharing their voting intentions. Some example responses are below. These are just a representational sampling of viewpoints that we collected — sentiments not easy to gauge by responses to mere yes/no questions.

“I don’t believe the information would be confidential and I think it’s dangerous to express an opinion outside of the current liberal viewpoint.”

“Well I probably wouldn’t give my opinion period, but if pushed, I would not give my real opinion for fear of reprisal if someone found out.”

“Because most polls released to the public are slanted and aren’t scientifically based. So, they are messing with the results of the survey from the beginning by knocking down one party or the other. I’m just trying to right the ship.”

“I am hounded day and evening by phone solicitors.  They interrupt me all the time; sometimes my irritation takes over, and I don’t answer correctly.”

“My answers could be recorded so I don’t really trust such phone conversations.”

“I do not discuss politics — let alone with a total stranger on the telephone.”

“I don’t always trust phone call surveys. I wouldn’t want to be bombarded with phone calls and political mail.”

“I don’t want my opinion associated with my phone number.”

“I am less anonymous, and somewhat ashamed of my opinion as it is frowned upon.”

In General, “Shy Voters” Cited Six Concerns:

1. A lack of trust in phone polls as truly being anonymous.

2. An apprehension to associate their phone numbers with recorded responses.

3. Fear that their responses will become public in some manner.

4. Fear of reprisal and related detrimental impact to their financial, social, and family lives should their political opinions become publicly known.

5. A general dislike of phone polls.

6. Malicious intent to mislead polls due to general distrust of media and political pundits (though a sentiment expressed only by a few “shy voters”).

It’s weird to read about people being shy about saying which candidate they support in the country that is supposed to be the land of the free and the home of the brave — especially if that candidate is already the president.

Something went horribly wrong.

We’ve got some new polls that do not look too bad, in fact.

You can say they’re fake or real or whatever – who even knows. We here at the Daily Stormer have questioned whether or not the 2016 polls were as fake as they appeared to be, or if people simply voted differently than they answered on polls.

Either way, it’s worth looking at the polls.

CNN:

Joe Biden’s lead over Donald Trump among registered voters has significantly narrowed since June, according to a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS, even as the former vice president maintains an advantage over the President on several top issues and his choice of California Sen. Kamala Harris as a running mate earns largely positive reviews.

And on the eve of the party conventions, a majority of voters (53%) are “extremely enthusiastic” about voting in this year’s election, a new high in CNN polling in presidential election cycles back to 2003.

Overall, 50% of registered voters back the Biden-Harris ticket, while 46% say they support Trump and Pence, right at the poll’s margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points. Among the 72% of voters who say they are either extremely or very enthusiastic about voting this fall, Biden’s advantage over Trump widens to 53% to 46%. It is narrower, however, among those voters who live in the states that will have the most impact on the electoral college this fall.

Across 15 battleground states, the survey finds Biden has the backing of 49% of registered voters, while Trump lands at 48%.

The pool of battleground states in this poll includes more that Trump carried in 2016 (10) than were won by Hillary Clinton (5), reflecting the reality that the President’s campaign is more on defense than offense across the states. Taken together, though, they represent a more Republican-leaning playing field than the nation as a whole.

The movement in the poll among voters nationwide since June is concentrated among men (they split about evenly in June, but now 56% back Trump, 40% Biden), those between the ages of 35 and 64 (they tilt toward Trump now, but were Biden-leaning in June) and independents (in June, Biden held a 52% to 41% lead, but now it’s a near even 46% Biden to 45% Trump divide).

The “battleground” states are the only thing that actually matters. The fact that 70% of New York supports Kamala doesn’t matter. These populous left-wing states skew the whole view on national polls. Urbanites will always be anti-social and always vote in an anti-social way. City dwellers hate freedom and love bizarre sexual activities, including man-on-man anal.

A WaPo poll has a different skewing.

Actually, it has almost the opposite skewing, which makes it difficult to believe either poll is all that meaningful.

Washington Post:

As the two major political parties prepare to open their national conventions, the race for the White House tilts toward the Democrats, with former vice president Joe Biden holding a double-digit lead nationally over President Trump amid continuing disapproval of the president’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic, according to a Washington Post-ABC News poll.

Democrats kick off their convention on Monday in a mood of cautious optimism, with Biden and his running mate, Sen. Kamala D. Harris (D-Calif.), leading Trump and Vice President Pence by 53 percent to 41 percent among registered voters. The findings are identical among a larger sample of all voting-age adults.

Biden’s current national margin over Trump among voters is slightly smaller than the 15-point margin in a poll taken last month and slightly larger than a survey in May when he led by 10 points. In late March, as the pandemic was taking hold in the United States, Biden and Trump were separated by just two points, with the former vice president holding a statistically insignificant advantage.

Today, Biden and Harris lead by 54 percent to 43 percent among those who say they are absolutely certain to vote and who also report voting in 2016. A month ago, Biden’s lead of 15 points overall had narrowed to seven points among similarly committed 2016 voters. Biden now also leads by low double-digits among those who say they are following the election most closely.

The president’s supporters are more eager than are Biden’s to cast ballots for him, with nearly 9 in 10 calling themselves enthusiastic and 65 percent saying they are “very enthusiastic.” Slightly more than 8 in 10 Biden supporters say they are enthusiastic about voting for him, with 48 percent saying they are “very enthusiastic.”

The motivations of the Trump and Biden supporters remain starkly different, with the president motivating both groups. Almost 3 in 4 who support Trump say they are casting an affirmative vote for the president, rather than to oppose Biden. Among those backing Biden, nearly 6 in 10 say they are voting mainly to oppose Trump rather than mainly to support the presumptive Democratic nominee.

Overall, 54 percent of registered voters say they are following the election “very closely,” a high water mark for polls at a similar point in campaigns over the past 20 years. The share of Republicans and Republican-leaning independent voters who say they are very closely following the campaign stands at 58 percent, the same was it was in early September 2016. Among Democrats and Democratic-leaning independent voters, 53 percent say they are very closely following the campaign, which represents a 13-point jump over this time four years ago.

I think what we’re seeing is a 50/50 split, where the election will be up in the air, and based on the whims of the mindless undecided in a few states. It will be based on what people who have no idea what is going on are feeling emotionally on the date.

That’s the core root of true democracy: the temporary emotional state of people who have no actual idea what is going on deciding the future of civilizations.

That’s why democracy is the greatest system ever invented by mankind, on all of the entire earth.

If the battleground states do mail-in voting, the chances of Trump winning drop to just about 0%.

The Democrats are just openly saying they’re going to do total fraud through mail-in voting.

So, I guess we’re probably going to have an idea who is going to win before the election. If Nancy Pelosi gets through mail-in in Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio, etc., then just forget about it. That’s when you want to sell your house and move to the country.

Here’s your song for that trip:

At this moment, there’s definitely some confusion as to how popular or unpopular Donald Trump is with the American people. This is largely due to the fact that the Jew-run news media lies about everything. The fact that they claimed Trump was a Russian agent with no evidence for over two years pretty much says it all. Most polls can’t be trusted because of how inaccurate they were during the 2016 election. The polls themselves have in many ways become a means of political propaganda and are not an accurate measure of the electorate.

They’re claiming that all of the leading Democrat candidates would easily defeat Trump in the 2020 election if that election was held today. But this claim is highly questionable and not based on any solid evidence.

Trump’s rally last week in New Hampshire provided some insight into his true popularity. I had the chance to talk to a number of people who attended that rally and they told me some interesting things.

Many thousands of Trump supporters went to see him speak, and they were all incredibly enthusiastic. There are lots of photos and videos which back up this anecdotal evidence. Trump has already shared some of this on his Twitter feed.

The Fake and Corrupt Media is sooo bad for our Country, The Enemy of the People! https://t.co/GPiklem0u1

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 20, 2019

MUST WATCH:

Massive overflow crowd outside of @realDonaldTrump's rally in New Hampshire chants "Four More Years!" & "USA!" while watching the president speak.

For the HATERS, "overflow" is the area outside a packed arena where people who can't get in can watch on screens! pic.twitter.com/k83a7yAB5W

— Team Trump (@TeamTrump) August 17, 2019

They also said that there were only a small handful of anti-Trump protesters in a fenced-off area, which they estimated to be in the range of maybe 30 or 40 people. The vast majority of them appeared to be misinformed, stupid or insane.

Even more interesting was how they encountered a number of people at the rally who were from other New England states which are considered to be Democrat strongholds like Massachusetts, Connecticut and Rhode Island. And many of these people were actually former Democrats who got sick of how ridiculous the party has become.

Granted, this is only a reflection of a small part of the country, but it seems to reveal that Trump still has a solid base of support and that there are people abandoning the Democrat Party to support him.

Trump’s political opponents put everything into the Russia hoax and to say that it blew up in their faces would be an understatement. Especially with Robert Mueller’s pitiful performance in front of Congress. Now they don’t even mention Russia and are back to claiming that Trump is some type of orange reincarnation of Adolf Hitler.

What we are seeing in the Jew-run media and on Jew-run social media sites are not accurate reflections of reality. They are false projections being created by these Jews with their billion dollar megaphones to make people believe that there’s this massive opposition to Trump. But if there was really this huge opposition to Trump, how come the people I talked to reported only seeing a small number of people protesting him at his recent rally? It would seem as if the failure of the Russia hoax has greatly demoralized his opposition and we can assume that there are a significant number of people who are angry that they were lied to for two years.

It’s obviously impossible to predict what’s going to happen in 2020 with all the social media censorship and election meddling by these big tech companies. But these anecdotal accounts appear to suggest that Trump is in a much better position than these liars in the Jew-run news media are letting on.

This can change, but so long as Trump doesn’t launch an insane war for Jews and the economy doesn’t collapse, he probably has a good chance of getting reelected. Especially if the Democrats nominate one of the crazier candidates.

Oh boy.

Big trouble over at a formerly pro-Trump news network that is now saying mean things. Or rather, doing mean polls.

The Hill:

President Trump criticized Fox News on Sunday over its recent polling, saying he doesn’t “believe” the polls in recent days that have suggested he’s losing ground to Democratic rivals and his disapproval rating is on the rise.

“I don’t know what’s happening with Fox,” he told reporters as he prepared to leave New Jersey, saying he doesn’t “believe” the polls.

“Fox is different, there’s no question about it,” he said, adding that he’s “the one calling the shots” on the election debates.

Trump would also not directly answer reporters if he’ll debate in 2020.

A Fox News representative was not immediately available for comment.

A Fox News poll released Thursday showed Trump losing head-to-head match ups against four top Democratic presidential primary candidates.

The poll found Trump trailing Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and former Vice President Joe Biden.  

You know the Fox News poll could very well be Fake News like Donald Trump claims. I’m not even being facetious here – we all (hopefully) learned the lesson from 2016 about fake polls and how the media is engaged in meme magic of its own, trying to will results into reality, not simply predict them without bias.

And Fox News has been nearly as liberal as any of the other stations lately.

But there are a whole list of issues that Donald has waffled or failed to deliver on that might lower the enthusiasm for his re-election bid just a smidge. Just as an example: releasing criminals onto the streets and the resulting uptick in violence might not be received well by the base.

Do you know you signed the "First Step" Act? https://t.co/e5WBVvbYo4

— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) August 15, 2019

It may have caused some of his fans to get upset that the President cared more about what the Kardashians thought of him than his base.

And then there’s the whole “Make Promoting Sodomy Worldwide” thing a key priority of the White House…

And then there’s the whole corporate censorship issue that he refuses to do anything about…

And then there’s that whole issue where the President allowed the federal agencies to run roughshod over his own supporters…

And yeah, there are probably some other things I’m forgetting.

Hopefully, someone on Trump’s team slaps the diet soda out of his hand and informs him that 2020 is not in the bag yet and that he needs to give his base at least something before 2020 comes around…

Anything at all at this point, really.

Everyone knows that the words and predictions of Nate Silver are infallible.

Just like when he predicted that Trump had literally no chance of winning in the primaries.

Or when he predicted the same for the general election.

We all know how that turned out.

There’s clearly some of that Jewish Privilege at play here, because how else are we to explain why this man still has a job?

So he has a new prediction.

87% goyim. No chance in hell Trump will win.

Well, we all know that the media does not lie. We all know that Jews like Nate don’t have an agenda. We all know that the polls are impartial and not a psyop to affect election results… right?

With idiots like this calling the midterms for the Dems, you just know things are looking up for Trump.

Get out there and vote, just to see Nate Silver’s reaction as he gets BTFO’d a third time, betting against Trump and the new and improved White Power Party.