It has been clear now for all of us whites, and during these elections, since the start of the multicult push, that at the foundation of the acts and polices lie the words.

“In the beginning was the word, and the word was made flesh” or in other words, the philosophy is thought of, then put into words then tools used to make it a religion and further words used to enforce the mind control of the flock.

If there was one word anyone of us Europeans were asked has been the most potent weapon to enforce our destruction, we would all answer in unison, the word “racist”. It has been the one tool which came out in this election in Britain, UKIP usually treated it with the disdain it deserved, but in the last week something very weird happened, did any of you notice it. Sure the media became hysterical, and went into racist-screaming berserk mode. Farage usually seemed unperturbed by the word, which unusually seemed to allow the rest of Britain to fob off it’s power and also disregard it, but then, he buckled, and in the last week, it was as if, what otherwise was water off a duck’s back, and earned him admiration, had him running to address this accusation, all of a sudden, his whole campaign for the last week went into combatting this word “racist”, which in itself gave the whole word the power and magic it has. It diverted the UKIPers into talking mostly about that issue, it had Farage invested into talking only about that and being on the back foot, it once again put the whole Island into religious fanatic and cowering mode, as if the thought-police or witch-hunters from 1984 might burst into their own houses and take away any who may be found to described as this word, racist.

And this is the thing I noted as an Irish Celt, viewing Britain from Ireland, for one brief moment, forget the inappropriateness of UKIP as a nationalist party for a moment, but on another note, the way their campaign was conducted up until the last week, it was as if, the spell of that word, had been broken, there was a massive vibe of relief, I could see and feel it over here. Britons were able to voice and assert their right to protect their ethnicity and ethnic home, without feeling it was wrong, instead feeling like it is the most natural thing in the world, and it is. Then the spell’s power was allowed smother that break for air, and was upon you again, UKIP decided to address this word, giving the issue power, and once again making people come under the 60 years of neo-marxist brainwash and word conditioning, and that is exactly what happened, I could feel Britons going back to feeling guilty, feeling they had to check whether they were a good person or not, perhaps they had to turn themselves in for entertaining the idea they were going to vote UKIP. Anyway the result showed they did, but I could discern a slight blink in the British before the final voting. There is no doubt that after resuming into racism-conditioning mode, they were only given extra reassurance because they saw brown faces amongst UKIP, whereas up to this, this did not have the power to worry them.

So how many of us really know what that word means. I know when I challenge anti-whites to define what they mean by racist, they rarely answer it.

Oxford dictionary: The belief that all members of each race possess characteristics, abilities, or qualities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races:

Prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one’s own race is superior:

So now we can see why neo-marxists and leftist fanatics rarely like to tell you what racism means, after they have accused you of it to try to shut down argument or shut you down and manipulate on-looker sentiment to their position.

We can see from science that the 1st paragraph of the definition is true and factual, it goes on to say, “especially” to designate an inferiority or superiority of different races.

Now when whites discuss differences in races, they are not always doing so expressly to discuss superiority etc, sometimes it is quite normal to discuss difference. One can express the difference between races while not meaning that one hates other races. One can say a mentally retarded person has lower IQ while not disrespecting or not being able to love that person. Sometimes I personally find people who are less intelligent far better and nicer people than more intelligent people, usually what is really important is loyalty and reliability, and that is found independent of intelligence. But you get the point about talking about difference not implying race hatred.

So this is the first point about being accused of racism, speaking about differences does not imply inferiority or superiority.

But let us say we were talking about superiority and inferiority, there again, no hatred is implied, if we have empirical evidence, which there is for IQ and other racial characteristics, then stating such, is again, not implying one hates or intends harm to another person on account of their race.

And here is where we get to the race-carders next point. If we state the facts there is a difference, or a superiority/inferiority, then by definition that is racism.

But the race-carders bring it a little further, they say that expressing a preference, is racist. In expressing that you want to protect your own British or Irish ethnic group, you are expressing a preference, over people who are not ethnically British and that therefore is an expression of finding one group inferior/superior to another, therefore that is racist. So goes their accusation and claim……….and they are correct, that is racist.

The point here is, examining the word racism, we see that it is in fact a con-word.

Every ethnic people have come through time and exist today precisely because they have resisted, fought and survived the battles for territory that ensure their existence. Sure there have been invasions and some assimilations of other western European folk, but these were invasions, resisted by the natives, and also the peoples were of the similar western European blood or DNA and culture/mindset. But the different European peoples largely remained who they are up to today. But I do not want to get into that, it is a separate issue.

The main point is, the Irish, the British are separate, similar but unique long-standing ethnicities on these islands, and our ancestors fought for their ethnic people and culture, they fought for territory, which became their ethnic territory and so that struggle continued, a natural claim to a territory, lose that and they lose their ability to be the people they came from and whom they want their children to be as well as their unique way of expressing themselves in this life. In other words, the time old phenomenon of protecting your ethnic group and home, is what today is called “racism.”

So, when they say we are racist, they are correct, it is a good thing, it was never a bad thing, until, some people realised that they wanted to stop a certain people protecting themselves, which by definition means you must stop them defending their ethnic home, their territory. So define a philosophy, gather the words you need to label your enemies, over years of soft indoctrination in their schools and academies and institutions, get them to have low self esteem, feelings of guilt, engendered by supposed wrongdoings of how they treated other human beings, thus they do not have the moral high ground.

Thus a religion is made, have no doubt folks, this is what we are dealing with, a religion. You have your sin, your guilt-ridden populace, your high-priests, the ideas and conformists who by upholding the tenets of the new religion are seen as the uppers of society, it is the same religious snobbery conducted by the old churches both here and in Britain, with the look-down the nose adherents, and the staunch proponents usually being the social status aware middle class. Today after the bankruptcy of the CoE and Roman Catholicism, the people have sought something that they want to make them feel good boys and girls, or to adopt something that is status elevating, enter multicult.

So at the root of it all, we really have to deconstruct the word “racist” and challenge people when they throw that at us, it must be destroyed for the con-word that it is, shown how protecting one’s ethnic group, the culture they created is normal and healthy and our right as also stated in the UN charter of genocide, and how these people support this very right of non-whites to protect their ethnicities.

We must deconstruct the religion of multicult, showing how it is not respectable, not moral, does not give a moral high ground, and in fact the middle class are displaying a hypocrisy by simply swopping one form of empty church of England/Roman Catholic piety/snobbery (they were religionists without knowing the true Christian spirit, same as Roman Catholics), and they have narrow-mindedly swapped one empty snobbery for another, this time they wallow in how humanitarian they are while not really giving a damn about real poverty either here or in the 3rd word.

They attach themselves like limpets to multicult precisely because it has the mechanism or psychological pathology of a religion, it must be dismantled, destroyed and deconstructed, in every word, sentence and conversation you have online or in person, but you must first know what you are dealing with, and the real meaning of the words labelled against you. How many of you knew that indeed you are racists, the real issue is to know and show, that racism is not wrong. We are not race-haters or hate-ists. The people who have lied, deceived and tried to manipulate the populace so that whites are not allowed protect their ethnic groups and ethnic homes, are the real hate-ists.

Its last political correctness row was over the use of the N-word.

Now, the BBC is once again under fire. Only this time, the dispute involves a rather less offensive term … girl.

The corporation was accused of censorship after cutting the ‘G-word’ from a documentary on the Commonwealth Games.

During the programme, presenter Mark Beaumont, 31, was flung to the ground by a young judo champion, and joked: ‘I am not sure I can live that down – being beaten by a 19-year-old-girl.’

His remarks were aired in full when the documentary, called The Queen’s Baton Relay, was first broadcast on the BBC News Channel in April.

But fearing viewers might take offence, the corporation decided to edit out the word ‘girl’ when it was repeated last week.

Critics, however, attacked the move. Tory MP Philip Davies, who sits on the Commons culture, media and sport committee, said: ‘They are finding offence where none is taken or intended.

‘We are going to end up in a situation where nobody is going to dare say anything lest some politically correct zealot deems it offensive.’

Mr Beaumont, a record-breaking cyclist and adventurer, also questioned why the cut was necessary, writing on Twitter: ‘Maybe the editor thought it was sexist – it wasn’t. I’m not worried about it.’

Even the teenage judo champion in question, Cynthia Rahming from the Bahamas, was baffled. ‘I wasn’t offended – I didn’t find it sexist,’ she told The Mail on Sunday.

The row comes a fortnight after the BBC was criticised for forcing veteran Radio Devon DJ David Lowe to quit for mistakenly playing an old version of The Sun Has Got His Hat On featuring the N-word.

Read More

From my vantage point as a middle-aged racially aware European-American, it appears that the oft-thrown epithet of “racism” is on life support.

In days before my time, this charge of “racism” may have had merit. There were in American history many examples of disparate treatment meted out to certain people on account of their skin pigmentation: sending black people to the back of the bus, interning loyal Japanese-Americans and offering cash payment for the scalps of dead Indians. Even if this was exaggerated, the claims had at least some merit.

But now that this sort of ugly treatment is something of the past. Because of my pro-White advocacy and my dogged determination that there be a future worth living for my two children and White children everywhere, I have been labelled a “racist” even by self-proclaimed “conservatives.” With truth in labelling in mind. I feel the term should alternatively be written “con”-servative with the emphasis on “con.” These people worship the Founding Fathers, but conveniently overlook that a good many of them (e.g. G. Washington, P. Henry, T. Jefferson et al) viewed black people as mere agricultural implements akin to a draft horse and owned a great many (app. 2000 in the case of Washington). That “con”-servatives cling to these men like Linus to his blanket while ignoring their “racism” truly makes them “con”-men who “serve” their own agenda and financial enrichment.

So, in their opinion, I’m a “racist.” That’s fine. If adults my age or older want to engage in childish name calling instead of addressing the pertinent issues of the day I can’t stop their adolescent behavior. I’ve never owned black people like the Founding Fathers did, nor do I promote the superiority of one race over another, yet they’ll be happy to go along and call me a “white supremacist” if it gets them a few browny points from the liberals.

Really there doesn’t seem to be a dime’s bit of difference between these “con”-servative and their faux “liberal” opponents. I’m an adult, a college grad and an Army veteran. If I could handle basic training and screaming drill sergeants, I certainly can handle their feeble name-calling. My children’s future is non-negotiable, Mr. Conservative. Unlike you I have an unshakable core, better known as a back bone.

“Racism” nowadays doesn’t exist as a state policy. On an individual and private basis, yes. Nobody can argue that these black flash mobs beating up individual White people aren’t crude examples of “racism.” Truth be told, approximately 85% of the estimated yearly 1.2 million interracial crimes involve a white victim and a black perpetrator. But regarding contemporary public policy, “racism” is no more than an excuse that non-whites use when they can’t adequately compete against Whites for the expenditure of social resources, be it college admissions, promotions or general success at life.

If Tyrone can’t get a job as a firefighter because he scored low on the entrance exam, he is encouraged to blame “racism” rather than his lack of commitment to scholarship and attending school. If Tamika isn’t promoted to supervisor because she has a history of being late to work or failing in her workplace duties, she is encouraged to scream “racism” rather than improving her work ethic. In this regard, the current “racist” campaign hurts blacks and other non-Whites, because it encourages blame-shifting rather than self-critique. When one fails to take responsibility for his own shortcomings, there is little possibility for personal improvement. Maybe that’s what these white “liberals” really secretly desire for the black man.

In my estimation the “Racism Campaign” is on empty. In just the past week I noticed two news stories which must be described as “the last racist stand on Fiji.”

At the elite Dartmouth College in New Hampshire (current yearly tuition $46,274 if you don’t receive a “minority” scholarship) there is the news that a joint fundraising party to benefit a cardiac treatment facility has been called off due to “racism.”

The Phi Delta Alpha fraternity and the Alpha Phi sorority were jointly planning this fundraising soiree and were advertising it as the “Phi-esta,” a clever take on the Spanish word “fiesta”. Apparently, a Dartmouth student born in Mexico took offense at the use of this word by White individuals. Okay, I get it. Under the current “rules of society” (undemocratically made and enforced by our PC Lords and Masters but supported by “con”-servatives who espouse democracy and the rule of law) black people are free to call themselves “niggers,” but if a white person utters the word, even in a thirty year old court document (think: Paula Dean) it’s time to burn them at the stake. For reasons of professionalism, I think “nigger” is a word to avoid and even though I have been called a “racist” and “white supremacist” by “con”-servatives; I’ve never directed the word at a person with a darker hue than mine.

But come on, fiesta? This is a word that comes out of Spain, a European land. Ultimately, the word goes back to the Latin festum. Perhaps those Spanish conquistadors were wrong to teach their language to the native Indians of Mexico and South America. Who’s to say?

So, this Phi-esta was to feature Mexican food. I’ve certainly had my fair share of this cuisine over the years. In fact, my college dining hall occasionally put on “Mexican night,” where they served us impressionable undergrads a heaping quantity of this delicious multicultural food. But back in 1989 when I graduated things were different and the “Racist Campaign” never called this “racist” because they weren’t so desperate to keep their campaign alive. I guess in 1989 there was still the occasional klan march or some uneducated White person uttering “nigger” in public.

There was nothing said of “Mexican night” by the enlightened elite of my college. They were too busy occupying the campus bookstore to ensure that it didn’t sell dictionaries containing an entry for the word “nigger” or complaining that our sports team should not be called “The Tribe,” since that was undoubtedly insensitive to Indians. But weren’t there 12 non-Indian tribes of Israel in the Holy Bible?

People who know me well know that I am a fan of the Beatles and other classic 60’s rock music. Since I have been labelled a “racist” by “con”-servatives few will believe I am telling the truth when I say that one of my favorite period songs was “The Happening” by Diana Ross and the Supremes. I’m afraid that my favorite version is still in Black & White. Hope that doesn’t spur another charge of “racism” against me!

Now, there is this 3rd rate pop singer known as Avril Lavigne. In my opinion the flatulence of Diana Ross would outdo the singing ability of Avril, but my opinion is beside the point. We are hearing that her new song “Hello Kitty” is “racist” because there are young Japanese women dancing behind her in the video.

No, I’m not going to patronize Avril’s garbage by watching the video. But in her defense against being “racist” she says that she spends a lot of time in Japan and is a big fan of their culture. For the record, I too am a big fan of Japanese culture, but don’t have Avril’s fortune to travel the world. Going to Japan is on my bucket list.

If I were able to bring back just one person from the dead it would be Karen Carpenter, who passed away well before her time in 1983. Richard and Karen Carpenter spent a lot of time in Japan and are well known for their rendition of “Sing” with Japanese children. How dare Karen stand in front of Japanese children!

But back in 1974, nobody called this “racist” because the “Racist Campaign” still had a fair amount of real “racism” to fuel their anti-white campaign.

In past decades Japanese people have taken a real liking to western culture. You can easily find videos of Japanese symphonies playing Beethoven, Bach and Mozart. And then there’s that Japanese lady, who does a damn good impression of Karen Carpenter.

But that is never called “racist” by the “racist campaign.”

Understand that this campaign is not about promoting the dignity of all people. A Japanese person is never called “racist” for mimicking a Caucasian. The “racist campaign” is a one way street. It’s nothing less than a battering ram used by international bankster gangsters and their Republican/Democrat lackeys to beat down people of European descent into submission. For with submission one will give up one’s inheritance. Rather than being called “racist” most “con”-servatives would rather give away their children’s inheritance (ie. this country which our European ancestors carved out of the wilderness) to the masses of the Third World. Only by committing an act of collective racial suicide can the “con”-servative feel that he is a good person because good people are not “racists.” Thus he “cons” future white generations – including his own children – out of a future.

What a psychopath!

We should rejoice at the “racist” news coming out of Dartmouth and Japan. The “racist campaign” clearly is suffering from stage IV cancer and has one foot in the grave. With every subsequent accusation of “racism” the average disgruntled European-American in TV land realizes that the “racist campaign” is like a giant with clay feet. It’s like an engine running on fumes or a brain-dead body being kept alive with a respirator and feeding tube. With every subsequent fraudulent accusation it further makes itself a laughing stock. We should encourage the purveyors of this campaign to continue down this road. Eventually the charge of “racism” will garner laughs just like the little boy who cried wolf. By applying this epithet to increasingly laughable situations, the purveyors of this epithet will ultimately bury it.