It gets dumber as it gets stupider.

Breitbart:

Politically correct health bosses in the United Kingdoom have banned the use of the word “alcoholic” for supposedly being too offensive, alongside a host of other words, including gendered language.

Guidance drawn up by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), which serves the National Health Service (NHS) branches in both England and Wales, has introduced a swath of newspeak-esque speech codes for healthcare professionals.

Among the words and phrases that have run afoul of the PC brigade include the term alcoholic, which was baneed in favour of the lengthy “those who misuse alcohol”, according to The Sun newspaper.

Healthcare staff were also told that they should say “people who use drugs” rather than “drug addicts” and “people who smoke” instead of “smokers”. In addition, the Health Department branch said that “rough sleepers” should now be referred to as “people who experience homelessness”.

The pet issue of the woke left, changing language on gender, was also featured in the NICE guidance, with words such as men and women being scrapped entirely.

“You can usually use gender-neutral language if the population is broad. This means using ‘people’, ‘they’ and ‘them’ instead of ‘women’, ‘men’ and ‘his’ or ‘her’,” the health bosses wrote.

Commenting on the latest newspeak from the medical establishment, Conservative MP Nigel Mills said that it was “just woke nonesense”.

“They should stop being so politically correct and instead look to do something useful to help the country,” the Tory MP added.

Your party has been in power for a gazillion years, why aren’t you doing something about it?

I was wondering when women would take over firefighting.

I’m sure we’re all going to be a lot safer. If there’s one thing that stupid whores understand, it’s how to handle a hose.

LBC:

The term ‘fireman’ has been branded an exclusionary and sexist term that should be “erased from our vocabulary”, according to Greater Manchester’s chief fire officer.

Chief fire officer Dave Russel has said both ‘fireman’ and ‘firemen’ will no longer be tolerated as they represent a damaging “form of micro-aggression”.

Mr Russel said the term ‘firefighter’ should be used instead so that language is more gender-neutral.

In an email sent by Mr Russel, the fire chief said the term “regularly slips into every day vocabulary”, according to The Telegraph, and said use of the term goes “unnoticed and unchallenged”.

Dave Russell

“Its connotation is sexist, exclusionary, and represents a form of micro-aggression that is damaging to our culture,” Mr Russel said.

“This needs to stop and the term permanently erased from our vocabulary. We employ firefighters, not ‘firemen’, and haven’t for decades, so why use the term?

“I am clear today that the use of this term will not be tolerated in GMFRS.”

He then told The Telegraph: “There is no reason for us to use language that minimises or overlooks the vital role anyone plays within our service.

“The importance of achieving the right culture and behaviour cannot be overstated.”

…

Other fire services across the country have taken similar the same stance in the past, including the London Fire Brigade, after former chief Dany Cotton slammed the term ‘fireman’.

Women are just as good as men, the only real difference is that they’re better at everything.

It’s really shocking that men are even allowed to have jobs anymore, given the competence level of women in all fields.

Any one of these women could get a job as a fireman if they wanted to

Not sure what they thought was going to happen at the university, but okay.

New York Post:

Beth Pensky, a 54-year-old single mother from New Jersey who now lives in Florida, never tells anyone that she’s estranged from her only son and daughter.

“I lie all the time,” said Pensky, who told The Post her kids have rejected her because they’re “woke” and she is not. “I can’t tell anyone I don’t have a relationship with them. I had so much shame about it. It looks awful for me and makes me feel terrible so I lie.”

But her attitude changed when she — and a number of other mothers — read a Post story in November about Annabella Rockwell, a graduate of Mt. Holyoke College who claimed she’d been “totally indoctrinated” into hard-left ideologies at the school and had to be deprogrammed.

“I saw Annabella’s story and my life turned upside down,” Pensky said. “I realized I wasn’t alone and I saw what happened to her was similar to what I think happened to my kids. I never even considered trying to find a deprogrammer. I didn’t know they existed. But I think it’s too late for me and my kids. They won’t even talk to me.”

Beth Pensky

A Manhattan mother of five daughters told The Post she saw their indoctrination into gender and race ideologies start at Dalton, one of New York City’s poshest private academies — and worsen when her girls went to colleges. Most of them went to Ivy League schools.

“The emotional stress is unbelievable,” said the mother, who did not want to be publicly identified. “I consider myself a Democrat and a liberal but it doesn’t matter. I’ve had fights with some of my girls just because I wouldn’t get myself a Rainbow pride Starbucks cup. The cup itself became this huge battleground. Apparently it matters what cup you hold.”

The mother said two of her daughters have tried to estrange themselves from her because they’re critical of what they see as her lack of political correctness and disinterest in gender and race ideology.,

“We actually would be estranged if it weren’t for me giving up,” the mother told The Post. “I keep coming back to the battlefield. I wanted a deprogrammer but didn’t know where to get one so I try to do it myself.”

K. Yang, 36, a former activist for trans and gay rights in upstate New York at one point identified with “they/them” pronouns. But she said she deprogrammed herself before becoming a full-time deprogrammer in 2018 — and is now busier than ever.

K. Yang

In addition to her website, StopFemaleErasure, Yang has a website called The Deprogrammer and runs a YouTube account under the handle “The Deprogrammer” and works with parents and their children individually.

Yang often leads anti-gender ideology protests at gender clinics and prisons, as well as at the National Monument in Washington, DC, and outside the United Nations. A typical YouTube video of hers is titled “Blurred Lines: The Agenda to Confuse Children About Sex & Gender.”

“A lot of these parents are completely bewildered,” Yang said. “A lot of them noticed a marked difference in their children’s behavior. Then all of a sudden ‘she’ identifies as ‘he.’ A lot of this is like a cult except parents don’t realize their child is being indoctrinated — not from an old-fashioned cult that takes you away somewhere but through schools and their devices. This is happening to kids everywhere, even those with a robust family life.”

Tennessee-born Ted Patrick, now 92, was well-known and often controversial in the 1970s and 1980s as the “father of deprogramming.” He helped hundreds of parents deprogram their children after getting them out of cults like the Moonies, the Hare Krishnas and the Children of God. He got into the work, he said, because his own son had joined a cult.

The problem, he told the Washington Post in 1979, was naivete: the college-educated ignorant, Patrick called them.

“That’s how they get these kids into these cults, ’cause they don’t know better!” Patrick said at the time. They haven’t seen the hard-core life! Man, I grew up with my daddy running numbers and the bootlegger in the apartment downstairs.”

Patrick, who lives in San Diego, told The Post that he still helps parents — and that deprogramming work is more in demand than ever. He claims to have deprogrammed more than 2,600 people in his career.

“It’s worse now than it was then,” Patrick said of the 1970s. “But parents are more scared and weak than they were then. You’ve got to get these kids alone. I’ve snatched people from Yale. I deal with the mind. You have to go into the mind, into that container, and bring the real person out. Once you get the person out you have to get the person thinking again — thinking like a critical thinker.”

Ted Patrick

Another mother named Dorothy, who did not want her last name used, also recognized her struggles with and near-estrangement from her 27-year-old daughter when she read The Post story about Rockwell.

The two had long been close but when her daughter went to a prestigious college out West and began taking gender studies and women’s studies, everything changed.

“Reading about Annabella was the first time I connected the dots to everything that had happened with my daughter,” Dorothy said.

Dorothy said they have been estranged off and on since her daughter’s sophomore year in college, with the young woman once refusing to go to Thanksgiving dinner with the family because she said they were celebrating “Columbus’ genocide.”

“She had what she called ‘an awakening’ and became very angry at me and her father,” Dorothy said. “It was a big personality change. We are conservatives so [political leanings] became a huge problem. We were not allowed to visit her on campus. She went on a mission to convert her brother against us. She told him that he should be against us because we’re conservatives and that we all should be against men.

Basically, this stuff has gotten too extreme for gen x liberals.

It’s an extreme cult.

It’s a boomer sort of talking point at this point, but it’s true: everything about the American system in 2022 is straight out of George Orwell.

It’s really wacky that they are so aggressively just doing all these things that are listed in 1984, including aggressively altering the language.

Breitbart:

Terms and phrases such as “American,” “Karen,” “prisoner,” and even “hip hip hooray,” are “harmful” and should be replaced with more acceptable alternatives, according to Stanford University’s recently exposed index of words to be “eliminated” from use.

The California-based university’s listing of “potentially harmful terms,” originally published in May, drew significant attention this week after seeing widespread exposure on social media.

According to the initiative’s website, the goal of the “multi-phase, multi-year project to address harmful language in IT at Stanford” is to strive to eliminate the “many forms of harmful language, including racist, violent, and biased (e.g., disability bias, ethnic bias, ethnic slurs, gender bias, implicit bias, sexual bias) language in Stanford websites and code.”

It also calls to avoid terms that derive from “colonialism.”

“We encourage you to evaluate the language you use and make changes where you can,” it continues.

The stated purpose of the site, which “focuses on potentially harmful terms” used in the U.S., is “to educate people about the possible impact of the words we use.”

The list of “harmful” terms to be “eliminated” appear in ten distinct categories.

Ableist

Under the “ableist” category of “harmful terms” which further the “belief that people who live with disabilities are abnormal,” Stanford recommends to “consider using” alternatives such as “person with a substance use disorder” instead of “addict,” “masked study” instead of “blind study,” “died by suicide” instead of “committed suicide,” “detail-oriented” instead of “OCD,” and “quick meeting” instead of “stand up meeting.”

Ageist

Under the “ageist” category of language which “singles out a person based on their age instead of their qualifications,” the Stanford list suggests using the person’s name instead of “gray beard,” and “person suffering from senility” instead of the term “senile.”

Culturally Appropriative

“Culturally appropriative” language that “misuses terms that hold meaning to a particular culture in a way that often lacks respect or appreciation” is also to be avoided.

The guide calls to completely desist from the noun “Brave” because it “perpetuates the stereotype of the ‘noble courageous savage,’ equating the Indigenous male as being less than a man.”

Other “offensive” terms and phrases to be avoided include: “bury the hatchet,” “chief,” “guru,” and even “tribe.”

Gender-Based

“Gender-based” terms, which are deemed “not helpful, and, in many cases, are exclusionary,” include the woke “‘preferred’ pronouns” instead of just “pronouns,” given that adding “preferred” implies that “non-binary gender identity is a choice and a preference.”

Words that reinforce “male-dominated language” include “mankind” which should be replaced with “people, humankind, [or] human beings;” “manmade” which should be replaced with “made by hand;” and “manpower,” to be replaced with terms such as “workforce” or “personnel resources.”

Even the term “seminal,” which refers to something that strongly influences later developments, is considered a reinforcement of “male-dominated language” and should be replaced with “leading” or “groundbreaking” instead.

Imprecise

Terms deemed “imprecise” include: “abort,” which “can unintentionally raise religious/moral concerns over abortion;” and even the use of “American” instead of “U.S. citizen” is deemed offensive in that it insinuates that the United States is “the most important country in the Americas (which is actually made up of 42 countries).”

The term “Hispanic” has roots that “lie in Spain’s colonization of South American countries” and is to be avoided as well.

Interestingly, the guide suggests that the term “Karen” is harmful and should be replaced with the apparently less offensive “demanding or entitled White woman” instead.

The term “oriental” is seen as “pejorative as it racializes people of Asian descent as forever opposite ‘others,’” while “peanut gallery” should also be avoided as it “refers to the cheapest and worst section in theaters where many Black people sat during the Vaudeville era.”

While the term “straight,” as opposed to “heterosexual,” implies that non-heterosexuals are “bent” or not “normal,” the guide also condemns use of the term “thug” instead of “suspect” or “criminal,” because it tends to take on a “racist connotation when used in certain circles.”

Institutionalized Racism

Terms deemed to be forms of “institutionalized racism,” include: “blacklist,” which “assigns negative connotations to the color black, racializing the term,” as well as “brown bag,” and “red team,” due to the fact that “red” is often “used disparagingly to refer to Indigenous peoples.”

The term “whitespace” also appears on the list, for it apparently assigns “value connotations based on color (white = good), an act which is subconsciously racialized.”

Person-First

Examples of “offensive” terms in the “person-first” category, which help to avoid defining people “by just one of their characteristics,” include the use of “convict” instead of “person who is/was incarcerated;” “homeless person” instead of “person without housing;” “immigrant” instead of “person who has immigrated” or “non-citizen;” or “prisoner” instead of “person who is/was incarcerated.”

Violence-themed

The guide also recommends “using non-violent alternatives” to violent language “whenever possible.”

The term “abusive relationship” should be discarded in favor of “relationship with an abusive person” in order to communicate that a person is committing the abuse and not the relationship.

Even the age-old universal idiom, “kill(ing) two birds with one stone,” which implies the accomplishment of two things at once, is deemed an apparent “expression [that] normalizes violence against animals,” as does the expression that there is “more than one way to skin a cat.”

In addition, the expressions to “take a shot at” something or to “take your best shot at” something, also “represent the unnecessary use of the imagery of hurting someone or something.”

Other Terms

Other terms blacklisted by the guide include the common cheer “hip hip hooray,” which Stanford claims “was used by German citizens during the Holocaust as a rallying cry when they would hunt down Jewish citizens living in segregated neighborhoods,” though the cheer originated long before the rise of the Nazi movement; as well as the phrase to “hold down the fort,” because it “stems from settlers and soldiers resisting ‘savages’ when ‘on the warpath.’”

In addition, the guide lists “long time no see” and “no can do” as offensive terms due to the fact that they “originated from stereotypes that mocked non-native English speakers.”

After being publicized this week on social media, the index of taboo terms and phrases was met with outrage and mockery.

“I remember how proud I was when I became a naturalized American citizen. I’m still proud to be an American, and I don’t care that @Stanford disapproves of my using the term,” wrote Stanford University Professor of Medicine Dr. Jay Bhattacharya.

“Stanford disapproves of saying you’re proud to be an American? Whoa,” replied Tesla CEO Elon Musk.

Stanford disapproves of saying you’re proud to be an American? Whoa.

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 20, 2022

The radical left is attempting to destroy our country and erase our history.

Now, Stanford University is seeking to ban the word “American.”

— Sen. Marsha Blackburn (@MarshaBlackburn) December 20, 2022

https://twitter.com/Bubblebathgirl/status/1605029838963761152?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1605029838963761152%7Ctwgr%5Ec72651ea907cc5f774b21e8338479d7fb718d7bd%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.breitbart.com%2Fpolitics%2F2022%2F12%2F20%2Fstanford-university-ripped-guide-eliminate-harmful-language-like-american-karen-prisoner%2F

You guys, this list of words that Stanford doesn't want us to use anymore is truly insane. https://t.co/mUMGgSSUAr pic.twitter.com/A7DtfpjIUv

— Justine Moore (@venturetwins) December 18, 2022

“The academy is beyond saving,” wrote another.

“You thought they were banning just ‘Confederates?’ Nope. Stanford’s new list of naughty words includes ‘American,’” another user wrote.

“American” is a very strange one to ban.

But it is really an obsolete term.

“America” doesn’t even exist anymore. What we have is Analmerica: land of the tranny and home of the child molester.

Woke University Bans 'Offensive' Terms Including 'Manpower', 'Able-Bodied', 'Baby Boomer' https://t.co/1S6UJ5O412

— Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) July 10, 2022

People fought and died for freedoms, and people now are giving them away for free.

They’re demanding they be taken from them.

Should I just type the thing I always type again? How much longer can I keep doing this?

It would be one thing if it was called a “Nip Pedophile Cartoon Hornet.” I think that would be a fair enough name for a dangerous insect. But Asia is a locale from whence the murder hornet originates.

Maybe it would be something if it was the African Murder Hornet, because Africans are well-known murderers. But Asians are not known for murder. Maybe if it was the Thai Ladyboy Hornet. Or the Burmese Genocider of Moslems Hornet.

Breitbart:

Political correctness has propelled scientists to change the name of Asian murder hornets to prevent potential discrimination.

Known officially as Asian giant hornets and colloquially as Asian murder hornets, scientists with the Entomological Society of America announced on Monday that the new official name will be the “Northern giant hornet,” even though they actually do descend from Asia and were only detected in North America in 2019.

“Amid a rise in hate crimes and discrimination against people of Asian descent, usage of ‘Asian’ in the name of a pest insect can unintentionally bolster anti-Asian sentiment,” the society said in a press release.

This respectable colored gentleman pushed this Asiatic in front of a train as revenge for being stung by an Asian Murder Hornet

The society further added that the negative stigma attached to the hornets’ name could lead to future violence against Asians.

“‘Asian giant hornet’ does not convey unique information about the biology or behavior of the species,” the society’s statement read.

Jessica Ware, president of the society, added that the name is “scientifically accurate.”

Jessica Ware, An African Big Booty Hoe Hornet

“Common names are an important tool for entomologists to communicate with the public about insects and insect science,” said Ware. “Northern giant hornet is both scientifically accurate and easy to understand, and it avoids evoking fear or discrimination.”

As noted by the New York Post, the hornets were first detected in the United States in 2019 and “caused quite the panic after pictures surfaced of their quarter-inch long syringe-like stinger.” Aside from their intimidating presence, the hornets are known to slaughter honeybees, which has led to worry they could cause an environmental imbalance.

This follows another strange action of renaming a thing, which was much funnier.

The World Health Organization (W.H.O.) also announced in June that it will officially rename the monkeypox virus to address concerns about the stigma and racism associated with the word. The change came after 30 scientists signed an open letter arguing for an “urgent need for a non-discriminatory and non-stigmatizing nomenclature for monkeypox virus.”

“In the context of the current global outbreak, continued reference to, and nomenclature of this virus being African is not only inaccurate but is also discriminatory and stigmatizing,” said the missive.

But there are monkeys all over the place. We’ve managed to wipe them out in many places, but half the world is still plagued with monkeys.

It isn’t called “niggerpox.” Maybe it should be. But claiming that “monkeypox” is racist against blacks implies that the WHO thinks black people are monkeys.

What else does it mean to say that “monkey” is a reference to “black people”?

This “rename every biological thing from a place” project ostensibly started with Donald Trump calling coronavirus “China Virus.” That was obviously intended to be “racist” in the sense that he was attacking the Chinese and blaming them for spreading the virus. Which is whatever. I don’t think that is true, and I don’t even support the anti-Chinese views of the Republicans and Democrats and Europeans. But if Donald Trump wants to call it the China Virus, is this not his prerogative?

The media started claiming that black people were attacking Asians at random because they support MAGA and blame them for the coronavirus. It was very confusing to anyone who doesn’t know this is all gibberish, I’m sure. They were also saying Trump hates black people and wants them to die, but he’s leading them into a brutal campaign of anti-Asian violence.

The New York Times created a list of Asians being attacked, and it was all ghetto blacks. I was like “isn’t this list what is racist? You’re making lists of black people.”

They actually included links to all of the news stories about the attacks. Over 100 links.

Let’s do a random number generator.

First up, article 18 on the list.

#18 is A woman at a crosswalk was shoved hard by a man, who then yelled, “Asians need to be put in their place.”

The are very politically correct in this story. They use the term “BM,” which of course stands for “black male.” But many people reading it just don’t know what it means.

I actually don’t even know the history of the use of “BM” by the police or if it is only Seattle that does it. I’ve seen it several times, but it might have only been in Washington.

It is really a lot more ridiculous than renaming the Asian Murder Hornet. This is to protect black criminals by confusing people, whereas changing the name of the Asian Murder Hornet is to prevent blacks from attacking Asians in revenge for being stung.

Let’s roll again on this NYT list of anti-Asian hate.

That links to “A 44-year-old woman on the subway was spit at by a man who hurled her phone to the tracks and called her an “Asian slut” in front of her children” in the New York Post, which doesn’t give a description or photo of the suspect. However, Gothamist has a picture from the NYPD, unfortunately.

Hilariously, even with the picture, the Gothamist did not his race in the description. Because that’s impolite.

Let’s just do one more.

Well, after a lot of counting (the list does not have its own numbers), we get to “An Asian-American owner of a laundromat was harassed by a group of teenagers who vandalized his store and used racial slurs, then attacked someone who tried to intervene.”

That story does manage to bury the race. But the headline definitely does not leave any room for doubt as to the race of the “group of teenagers.”

Remember the rallies against “anti-Asian hate”?

According to the current rules, these were actually hate rallies against black people.

They were rallies targeting a specific race of people. I do not believe there is a single anti-Asian attack on that NYT list that was not done by a black. So, “people who randomly attack Asians” is literally a codeword for “black people.”

They tried to blood libel white people for this.

Remember when that guy, who looked like an MK Ultra victim, shot up the handjob centers and then they tried to connect it in to blacks attacking rando Asians on the street?

He was literally in some evangelical cult where they told him that getting a rub and tug is “sex addiction*.” So he shot up the handjob artists for temping him. Instead of like, you know, killing someone who makes porno.

Every. Single. Time. pic.twitter.com/fWEhgRtTgx

— Unbiased Crime Report (@UnbiasedCrime) July 24, 2022

He was in inpatient psyche treatment. This is of course where the now-declassified MK Ultra experiments happened.

It could have just been a coincidence – but what a lucky one! Anyway, they made him the face of “anti-Asian hate,” even though his whole thing was about sex and had nothing to do with Asians (even if it wasn’t some mind control hoax).

That was one of the weaseliest fake new hoaxes yet. You had literally hundreds of black-on-Asian attacks, at least a lot of which were genuine “hate crimes” in the sense that they were shouting racial slurs as they attacked, the NYT printed the list, then blamed Donald Trump by claiming this evangelical freakazoid was the face of anti-Asian hate.

And now, the victims of the Asian Murder Hornet are suffering the consequences.

Also – they just renamed the Asian Carp.

What's in a name?
Would you rather eat slimehead or orange roughy, Patagonia toothfish or sea bass?
Asian carp — like slimehead and toothfish — gets a new, more palatable name: Say hello and yummy to "Copi." @IndyStarSarah has the story. https://t.co/GzNM2H4QGB via @indystar

— Tim Evans (@starwatchtim) July 27, 2022

The whole point of noting that these species are “Asian” is to point out that they are not native to America. They are called “invasive species” – that is, a species of animal that is not native, and thrives in a foreign environment where the food chain, climate, or something else is different, which allows them to thrive and create an ecological problem.

But of course – these leftists don’t care about ecology, which is why they use African child slaves to make deadly and poisonous electric car batteries and kill all the birds with these windmills which generally cost more energy to manufacture than they ever produce. Everything about modern leftism is anti-environment, because they hate beauty.

I was glad Tucker Carlson picked up on this Daily Stormer talking point about the ugliness of our environment. He mentioned it at his Iowa appearance earlier this month, and views making things less ugly as one of the most important things America should be concerned about.

I didn’t invent this talking point, by the way. You should listen to Roger Scruton, if not read his books.

(He’s a good talker, so reading the books is sort of a waste of time. Not a waste of time. But I tried one of them and didn’t really seem to be getting more than what I’d gotten listening to his talks. If you want to absorb as much information as possible, you should be as efficient as possible, and a lot of times listening to speeches or podcast interviews is more efficient than reading a book. You can’t lift or go for a walk while reading. Some information is better taken in through reading, but a lot of it is just as good through audio.)

Everything that comes from the left – or more specifically, Jews and women – is a lie. It’s always been that way. But these lies are getting much dumber, and more destructive. It did make sense to blame white people for anti-Asian attacks, because the Jews want to use black people to harm whites. They also want to protect the reputation of blacks, in order to promote the idea that whites are lesser than blacks and should be subservient to them. So while the hoax was painfully obvious, and it is truly an outrage that they were not called out on it, it at least followed logically.

However, there is no valid justification, even within the liberal/Jewish worldview, for renaming invasive species from Asia. This appears to be intended simply to confuse people. Or, more likely, people who classify animals want to be trendy, and were sitting around thinking “how can I contribute to racial equity?”

This is on par with the racist bird-watching scandal.

'A flock of evidently evil colonial birds…'

On the Alex Agenda, Alex Philips tells Simon McCoy about the campaign calling for the renaming of birds with names 'related to the slave trade.'

Watch GB News on Virgin Media 626. pic.twitter.com/7OqhJw9sc3

— GB News (@GBNEWS) July 16, 2021

*“Sex Addiction” is a stupid concept, at least in relation to men. If a man under the age of 50 or so with regular testosterone does not ejaculate for 7-10 days, he will start getting erections in public, and will eventually either spontaneously ejaculate, or hump his bed while he is sleeping until he ejaculates. This is a very annoying biological reality, and calling it an “addiction” is nonsensical. What exists is sexual immorality. Going to a handjob center is something that is sexually immoral, and something that we should repent for. But it’s a good thing Jesus died for our sins, because for a man with no wife, it is very difficult to not have sex or masturbate, and actually, involuntary bed-humping while asleep is a form of masturbation that you cannot prevent from occurring. This is why in Christianity, men are encouraged to get married – you can then manage your sexual urges without engaging in sin. Celibacy should be the goal, of course, and we should pray for the strength to overcome our base urges. However, you will probably make mistakes, and need to repent of them. This is not “addiction.” This term “sex addiction” is also used for men who have sex with a lot of women – beyond what is necessary. This can be simply immorality, or it can be some kind of disorder where the man needs approval from women, because of Mommy Syndrome. But it is not an “addiction.” So, it is possible that the Handjob Massacre was a result of stupid evangelicals giving bad counseling, rather than and MK Ultra event. Regardless, it sure was a nifty fit, and came at just the right time to blame white people for an endless series of random attacks on Asian people. 

Editor’s Note: I think I covered a lot of ground in this piece in a way that was coherent, jumping from point to point but linking everything together nicely. Like and subscribe for more articles that link a bunch of different concepts together in a way that helps to teach your brain to make connections between things that the Jewish media wants you to view as totally unrelated phenomena. 

This will actually make your life easier.

No, seriously.

You didn’t know you’re not allowed to say “mankind” anymore, but you could get fired, banned from the internet, and sued for using that term. Merrick Garland might even have you thrown into a political torture prison.

This is serious business.

You should be thanking MicroSoft for keeping you up to date on words that could destroy your life.

Breitbart:

Microsoft has reportedly introduced a new feature in the latest version of its Word software that suggests more politically correct phrases and words, including the removal of offensive terms like “mankind.”

The Daily Mail reports that Microsoft has added a new feature to the latest version of Word that acts as an auto checker for inclusive language and suggests politically correct alternatives to certain words. The new feature adds a purple line below words or phrases deemed to be “problematic” by the woke tech giant.

Once Word has highlighted the potential troublesome word or phrase, it will suggest a politically correct alternative. In one case, Word suggested changing the term “Postman” to “mail carrier” or “postal worker.”

The software also suggested an alteration to the famous quote from astronaut Neil Armstrong, suggesting that the quote “one giant leap for mankind,” should be updated to “humankind,” or “humanity,” instead. Luckily, the feature can be turned off in settings.

This was NOT a joke

This update to the popular Word software comes just shortly after a survey found that U.S. customers ranked Microsoft as one of the most trusted tech firms, with 43 percent of poll participants stating that they trust the firm “a great deal/a good amount,” compared to Google and Facebook.

Who on earth trusts MicroSoft? Who are these people?

I guess if the question is “do you trust MicroSoft more than Google and Facebook?”, then maybe it makes sense.

Good to see America’s still trying to tackle the hardest issues of our time.

I hope completely destroying the life of anyone who ever said Asian Carp is next.

AP News:

Minnesota state Sen. Foung Hawj was never a fan of the “Asian carp” label commonly applied to four imported fish species that are wreaking havoc in the U.S. heartland, infesting numerous rivers and bearing down on the Great Lakes.

But the last straw came when an Asian business delegation arriving at the Minneapolis airport encountered a sign reading “Kill Asian Carp.” It was a well-intentioned plea to prevent spread of the invasive fish. But the message was off-putting to the visitors.

Hawj and fellow Sen. John Hoffman in 2014 won approval of a measure requiring that Minnesota agencies refer to the fish as “invasive carp,” despite backlash from the late radio commentator Rush Limbaugh, who ridiculed it as political correctness.

“I had more hate mail than you could shake a stick at,” Hoffman said.

Now some other government agencies are taking the same step in the wake of anti-Asian hate crimes that surged during the coronavirus pandemic. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service quietly changed its designation to “invasive carp” in April.

“We wanted to move away from any terms that cast Asian culture and people in a negative light,” said Charlie Wooley, director of its Great Lakes regional office.

The Asian Carp Regional Coordinating Committee, representing agencies in the U.S. and Canada that are trying to contain the carp, will do likewise Aug. 2, he said.

The moves come as other wildlife organizations consider revising names that some consider offensive, including the Entomological Society of America, which this month dropped “gypsy moth” and “gypsy ant” from its insect list.

Yet the switch to “invasive carp” might not be the final say. As experts and policymakers have learned in their long struggle against the prolific and wily fish, almost nothing about them is simple. Scientists, technical journals, government agencies, language style guides, restaurants and grocery stores may have ideas about what to call them, based on differing motives — including getting more people to eat the critters.

…

Song Qian, a University of Toledo environmental sciences professor who teamed with Kocovsky on the article, said carp is a valued protein source in many Asian nations. It’s a good-luck symbol in his native China.

“If you say it’s invasive, bad and needs to be eradicated, even though it’s because of miscommunication, that’s why there’s talk about cultural insensitivity,” Qian said.

It’s most accurate to refer to the fish species individually, he said, acknowledging a collective name is sometimes convenient. The challenge now is finding the right one.

Regardless of which one eventually sticks, said Hawj, the Minnesota legislator, who immigrated to the U.S. from Laos as a child refugee after the Vietnam War, he’s glad “Asian carp” is on its way out. He recalled the warm applause he received at an Asian-American conference after announcing his state had made the change.

“It’s a nuisance, a small thing, but it can resonate greatly,” he said.

It’s about time people recognized the fact that goldfish and koi are disgusting carp.

No matter what you think about the name – at least the discussion is in the media.

People who flush their goldfish down the toilet instead of cleaning the bowls frankly have no idea the threat we face from these disgusting an inedible fish.

I don’t know the answer to the “backyard pond” question, but it’s a discussion we need to have as a society.

Anyway, yeah – ban VICE News for calling them “Asian Carpocalypse.”

What exactly are the qualifications for becoming a “diversity expert?”

It’s incredible how quickly people have forgotten just how badly attempts to implement communism have turned out in the past.

People seem to be totally oblivious to where this is all obviously going.

The College Fix:

A member of the University of Washington Student Senate has introduced a resolution to create a system for students and staff to serve on a jury to resolve “all discrimination accusations and charges that violate the University of Washington’s mission statement.”

“Every faculty member I have spoken to about this is deeply disturbed by the implications of this proposal,” Professor Stuart Reges, who teaches at the university, told The College Fix via email.

The resolution’s sponsor, Michael Saunders, named Reges’ conservative writings as one example of “faculty misconduct.”

According to Saunders, the university must “think outside the lens of an oppressive system and think in a mindset of innovation, improvement, and radical change,” his resolution states.

Michael Saunders

The proposal states that, when the university determines a case to be worthy of internal discipline, these juries would have the power to judge an action or trait to be discriminatory and to decide the proper punishment for it, which the university must respect.

Under the proposal, leaders from the student senate, faculty senate and administration would sit on a “Supreme Court” which would mediate jury deliberation and have the power to rule a decision “unjust or biased.”

Reges provided a recording to The College Fix of a nine-minute portion of the March 30 meeting in which the senate discussed the resolution.

One member of the senate, Esaac Mazengia, asked Saunders about the academic freedom implications of such a proposal.

“I think that academic freedom does not excuse disrespect,” Saunders said in his response. “If you disrespect somebody and you feel like you don’t want to respond to that as a professor, as a faculty member, then you have pretty much said, like, ‘I am willing to take this to a jury to see if this is respectful or not.’”

The College Fix reached out to David Frantz, Communications Director of the Associated Students of the University of Washington, which oversees the student senate.

The Fix emailed Frantz with a list of questions and asked to be put in contact with Saunders.

Frantz replied with the minutes from the March 9 senate meeting, where the resolution was first proposed, and a copy of the resolution, both of which were already public.

Frantz did, however, tell The Fix that the resolution is currently being discussed and has not been voted on.

The College Fix also requested a comment from Administrative Assistant to the Senate Sarah Croft, University of Washington spokesman Victor Balta, the general email address for the student senate, and the news team at The Daily of the University of Washington, which first covered the resolution. None replied.

According to the meeting minutes, Saunders was inspired to draft the resolution by “so many issues on campus about accountability for staff and faculty.”

His resolution accuses already established disciplinary groups, such as the Faculty Disciplinary Task Force and Bias Incident Advisory Committee, of not doing enough to crack down on “systematic oppression towards marginalized members of the community.”

The Faculty Disciplinary Task Force “hasn’t facilitated an environment that can hold faculty and staff accountable to the degree necessary for student safety … [and] doesn’t have substantial options for rehabilitating faculty and staff accused of misconduct,” the resolution states.

And the Bias Incident Advisory Committee “does not solve any problems for students directly and makes students feel like their stories are not being properly addressed,” the resolution states.

One example Saunders lists as an example of faculty misconduct is the case of Reges, a professor of computer science at the university who writes conservative op-eds for various publications.

Reges has written multiple opinion pieces for Campus Reform, one of which criticized the Black Lives Matter movement. Another piece which he wrote for Quillette denounced the firing of James Damore from Google and argued that discrimination was not the reason for a lack of women in STEM.

He told The College Fix the proposal is reminiscent of the Red Guard.

“They are recreating the struggle sessions of Maoist China during the Cultural Revolution,” Reges said.

Saunders, in the resolution, expressed displeasure that Reges is still employed by the university, denouncing a column Reges wrote for Quillette headlined “Why Women Don’t Code.”

In it, Reges reacts to the 2018 firing of Google employee James Damore, who wrote an internal memorandum criticizing the company’s diversity and inclusion efforts toward women.

In his piece, Reges writes, “women are less likely than men to want to major in computer science and less likely to pursue a career as a software engineer,” and gives his recommendations for getting more women into the field.

In the resolution, Saunders criticizes Reges for citing “research on universal sex differences” between men and women and expressing the belief “that systematic oppression is not the cause of the tech field’s boy’s club mentality, and places the blame on women’s drive to be involved in the field.”

I guess all we can do is wish them all the best.

You may remember that in 2018, rapper Kendrick Lamar invited a fat white girl on stage to sing with him, and then condemned her for not skipping the word “nigga.”

Some white girl said the N word on stage with @kendricklamar last night and it was WILD!!! She already deleted her Twitter. R.I.P Delaney pic.twitter.com/HUmpDcJHVP

— Auryan (@AuryanR) May 21, 2018

(Note that it is white people in that crowd booing her – I don’t think black people would have understood what she did wrong.)

At the time, a whole bunch of black people – and even some white leftists – were saying it was a setup, and just a really nasty thing to do to someone, let alone your own fan who probably paid $70 for the ticket (at least 21 cents of which Ticketmaster would have given to Lamar).

Well, after DMX’s death, video has emerged of him at Woodstock 2 in 1999, with a crowd that is almost entirely white, getting them to scream “nigga.”

DMX getting the mostly white Woodstock 99 audience to repeatedly shout the n word pic.twitter.com/UhQOghf4cE

— Paul Joseph Watson is a pedophile (@NakedSavior) April 9, 2021

(Here’s the full show on YouTube, in case that clip gets deleted from Twitter. If you’re Twitter name is “Paul Joseph Watson is a Pedophile,” your account probably isn’t going to be up very long. By the way, I don’t even know what that is a reference to, but I believe it.)

So what is the meaning of this?

The meaning is this: just like Asians can’t understand political correctness, black people can’t really either.

When I was a kid (in 1999), rap was popular among middle class white kids, and no one would have ever thought of the idea that it was some kind of sin to sing along with a rap song and say “nigga.” Neither white people, nor black people, would ever have thought of that.

Modern BLM type black people don’t understand political correctness either. What they understand is that they can go along with these things in order to gain power. That’s all.

Blacks are not actually offended by any of this stuff. Most black people do generally dislike white people, just as a rule, but that doesn’t mean that their feelings are hurt by these things that Jews claim hurt their feelings. I mean, I generally dislike black people, but my feelings aren’t hurt if a black person says “cracka.”

Of course, they will tell you now that “nigga” and “cracka” are different, because blacks can’t hurt someone’s feelings because they don’t have any power in society. But that is just weird nonsense – it literally does not make any sense. Firstly, black people do have power in society, and secondly, how much power the group you identify with has in society can’t possibly affect whether your words can hurt people’s feelings or not.

I can guarantee that when Kendrick Lamar entrapped that fat white girl and got her to say the n-word so he could white-shame her, her feelings were really hurt. She deleted all her social media accounts, meaning it basically ruined her entire life. It was three years ago, and I imagine she’s still suffering from the incident.

But listen: political correctness is a gigantic hoax. That would be true whether or not so-called “white racism” existed or not (it doesn’t exist).

The only people who seem to be capable of actually internalizing political correctness are white people, and it is a weapon designed to hurt us.

With regards to black people hating white people: DMX probably didn’t hate white people, because he was rich. Primarily, other than just a natural distaste for people who are different (something which all people have instinctively, but black people have a lot more of than any other race), the main reason black people hate white people is that white people have more money than them, and most poor blacks believe that white people have more money because of some kind of conspiracy against them.

Obviously, the opposite is true – whites have really, really put a lot of effort into bringing up the economic status of black people. It just hasn’t worked, because black people are, at least by white standards, really irresponsible with money.

The core problem is that most black people who get money just move out of black neighborhoods, and go live with whites. We recently saw this with the co-founder of Black Lives Matter, who supposedly hates white people, but decided to move into an almost entirely white neighborhood.

What would be ideal if instead of abandoning their own communities, black people who made money would instead figure out ways to help their own community. To be fair, some rappers have done this, but most rich black people haven’t done that.

Side Issue: DMX Vaccine Rumors

A black news website reported that they talked to DMX’s family and they said he hadn’t been smoking crack lately and instead died from the coronavirus “vaccine.” Here’s the article on MTO News, you can read and judge for yourself. I hate to do it, but here’s the Snopes link (probably don’t click that without a VPN/Tor) saying that there’s no evidence outside of this alleged interview with the family from a site that isn’t especially reliable.

As a rule, I would believe anyone other than Snopes. But I assume X’s family has social media, and they haven’t posted anything about this. If his kids or whoever come out and say the vaccine killed him on their own social media, that will be interesting, but this one website reporting it – I don’t really think that is very good evidence.

I tell you this because: if you spread these kinds of rumors, it discredits actual facts you might be trying to spread. We have enough facts, so there is no reason to go into unsubstantiated rumors.

That said: I don’t care if black people go around spreading this rumor. I’m not going to interrupt that. The fact that so many black people are unwilling to take the vaccine is a good thing for all of us. They are actually providing a kind of shield for white people who don’t want to take it. So if you’re someone working on trying to manipulate black people into doing things that benefit white people, then sure, go ahead and spread this rumor amongst them.

But don’t tell white people DMX died of the vaccine. White people can do a quick search and find out that the source for this is an unreliable black gossip site, and that will make you look stupid.

Many people have been asking when the media will take a stand against racist fonts.

Well, after all this time, CNN has stepped up to the plate and is taking on anti-Asian racism in fonts.

For years, the West has relied on so-called "chop suey" fonts to communicate "Asianness" in food packaging, posters and ad campaigns. But such fonts perpetuate problematic stereotypes. https://t.co/w85xSXp0iN

— CNN (@CNN) April 7, 2021

While white supremacists are trying to distract you with things like:

• The rapidly widening income gap
• The dissolution of all basic freedoms
• The continued escalation of tensions with China
• The coronavirus being a hoax
• The spiraling murder rate
• The economy collapsing
• The fact the election was fake
• The threats presented by emerging technology
• The fact that the coronavirus “vaccine” is actually a gene therapy procedure

And other such unimportant nonsense, CNN is hitting the hard issues – like racist fonts. 

I Can’t Even

The whole anti-Asian thing is getting totally out of control.

Asian people (even if raised in the West, frankly) have a sort of genetic autism and can’t understand what this “hidden secret implied racial stereotype bias” stuff even means. Honestly, I don’t think anyone other than white people understand what it means. (I have come to the conclusion that black people do not understand it, and simply have come to understand the specific triggers that can give them power over white people.)

I know as an absolute matter of fact that the Dr. Seuss images that are called “anti-Asian racism” would be liked by the Chinese.

They would probably make stickers out of that image, if they knew about it.

The same is true for the Chinese cat in the Disney film The Aristocats. That film was pulled from Disney’s streaming service because of the Chinese cat.

A Chinese person would see that and say “oh, it’s a China cat.” I don’t know if they would think it was funny, but they would probably feel appreciated that you thought about them and put them in your movie.

The Siamese cats were of course removed from Lady and the Tramp in the remake.

Chinese might actually not like that, but the reason wouldn’t be because of a “stereotype,” but because it shows Asians as the bad guys. The second Christopher Nolan Batman film wasn’t shown in China because it had a Chinese gangster in it.

“You no say bad China people” is a general sentiment, although that is mainly in relation to their domestic policy of not ever showing Chinese people in a negative light. In terms of people in other countries saying mean things about them – honestly, I don’t think they care at all either way what any non-Chinese person thinks about them. In my experience, they are more or less oblivious to it.

This is true both ways – they don’t seem to be interested in promoting positive sentiments towards their country anywhere outside of China. I give the example of the recent Chinese soulslike game Xuan-Yuan VII. A friend bought it for me, and I found it was a pretty decent game. I don’t generally play action games as a rule (I have never owned a console, but I do own a controller for rare occasions and side-scrollers), though I do sometimes enjoy the soulslike format.

I can’t play Dark Souls because it is just too dark and depressing. But this China game was a much lighter tone. It is based in ancient China and has themes of Chinese myth and history. You play as some kind of Kung Fu swordsman fighting demon monsters from Chinese mythology. It’s got a lot of the standard Chinese gooey sad type stuff, with a story of a boy’s family being killed and him growing up to take revenge.

This is a AAA game. It’s technically very well done. (It’s not game of the year, and I am not recommending it as some top hit, but it is plainly serviceable.)

But here’s the thing: they didn’t even bother to hire voice actors to do an English version of the game. It has subtitles, which barely make sense most of the time. They have clearly lost a good amount of money by not doing a translation, for one. For two: a good Chinese video game, that also portrays Chinese culture in a positive light, would create goodwill in the West. It’s a very simple thing: no one hates the Japanese, primarily because of Japanese culture being so prevalent in the West.

We had a war with Japan in the 1940s, but if you tried that now, people would say: “why do you want to kill Pikachu?”

Point being: as a general matter, Chinese are totally oblivious to the fact that anything outside of China actually exists. They are completely confused by the aggression of the West towards them.

This weird stuff with cartoons and fonts they just wouldn’t be able to grasp, at all. Anyone who knows anything about China, or just Asians in general, is aware of this fact.

Yes, I’m sure they can find some whitewashed Chinese women raised in America who will promote their hate hoaxes, but that is the extent of it. This CNN article interviews two different Chinese people who work in American academia who said they don’t think the fonts are racist, and must have been confused by the call from CNN.

Note: Clearly, there are things about Asians and Chinese in particular that Westerners will never be able to understand, just like they are unable to understand us.

People say that Google Translate doesn’t work on Chinese, because the translations don’t make any sense. Actually, the translation works perfectly, and it is simply that Chinese people use language in a way that is more or less incomprehensible to Westerners.

This massive cultural gap is being exploited by the US State Department and the CIA to attempt to stir up a conflict. All of this anti-Asian hate stuff is designed as a cover for escalating tensions with China, something which does not benefit Americans in any way, and makes no basic sense.

However: it is natural for people to be suspicious of the Chinese, simply because they are so different. I am pretty much the only person on the internet, left or right, speaking out against this push for war with the Chinese, and I’ve really been trying to understand why it is so widely supported. What I have concluded is that the Chinese are so much different than whites that it is very easy to sell white people on the idea that they are a threat or a menace of some kind.

It’s basically the Iraq War all over again, where you have aggressive, hateful Jews manipulating white people’s psychology to get them to engage in a conflict that only benefits Jews.

Peak Political Correctness

The anti-Asian hate hoax is clearly designed to run cover for the blacks, who are attacking Asians on the street, and for the Biden government, which is continuing to escalate conflict with the Chinese as part of a globalist agenda.

Related: The Anti-Asian Attacks are the Pre-Show for Mass Anti-White Attacks

However, while the anti-Asian fake hate wave we’re currently seeing has an immediate purpose, it is also part of the peak political correctness we are experiencing.

The goal is to close off entire areas of the human thought process, to force people to regulate their own thoughts, under fear of being destroyed. They are continually upping the ante, classifying more and more bizarre things as “racist” for the purpose of confusing people.

This is a conditioning process.

The end goal is to get people to the point where they are simply going along with anything the authorities say, without processing it through logically at all. That is why it’s getting increasingly silly. They don’t want you to understand it. They want to teach you to obey things that you don’t understand.

This ultimately isn’t really even about race. Race is just something very fundamental in people’s brains. We know that infants recognize race. “People who look like me are safer than people who look different” is a basic, hardwired instinct. Especially with blacks, frankly, when you see them your spine starts to tingle a little bit, in the same way it does when you see a spider or a snake. This is a genetically-coded safety mechanism – your genes telling you to be on high alert and be careful. Telling people to praise the blacks, and replace their neighbors with blacks, is no different than telling people to replace their dogs with giant spiders.

Aside from that, there is also a normal human fascination with exoticism, which is different from any “racist” instinct (it is sort of the opposite, actually), and they are lumping that in with racism in a really confusing way; that is to say: things that are actually tributes to foreign people are labeled racist hatred (the Asian fonts and cartoons do not contain any negativity, but they are telling us that any acknowledgement of difference is fundamentally negative).

They are messing with basic internal drives, calling these drives evil, in order to get people to submit.

It’s the same thing they do with forcing people to accept homosexuality. A heterosexual male’s brain has the same reaction to two men kissing as it has to maggots. They actually published this in a peer-reviewed journal in 2017.

You don’t have to be a scientist to understand what is going on there: maggots are present in rotting flesh, i.e., something you should not eat, as it could cause disease. Just so, homosexuality is something you should not engage in, because it can cause disease. That is where the hardwired biological revulsion towards homosexuality comes from: it is encoded in your genetics that homosexuality is dangerous.

They force homosexuality on you, from everywhere.

They tell you you are evil (anti-social) if you don’t accept it.

You see what is happening here: they are forcing you to suppress biological responses and natural urges. Once you get used to doing that, you lose connection with your natural modes of thought and emotion. This makes you totally malleable, and willing to accept things that should be considered horrible.

Political correctness is psychological warfare. It is a way to create an autoimmune response in people’s psychology, where a person’s thoughts and emotions are attacking their own personhood.

The only reason you would do this to people is if you were trying to hurt them.

Tying It All Up

Apparently, some of the readership has struggled with understanding the link between the anti-Asian hate hoax campaign and starting a war with China.

I’m not really sure how to say it any clearer than I have said it: they want cover so as to not be called racists for fighting a war against Asia. They have really played up this racism thing over the past decade, and they don’t want to be accused of racism for starting a war against a foreign race.

Furthermore, it is an attempt to get other Asians to side with ZOG against the CCP.

But it’s also simpler than that: this is all just total confusionism (not to be confused with Confucianism). They are purposefully creating mass confusion.

These are both nonsensical statements:

• “Asian-themed fonts hurt the Asian races through stereotyping subconscious biases used to otherize,” and
• “We have a duty to protect democracy in Taiwan from Chinese autocracy”

This is all psychological warfare, designed to push people along an agenda.

No matter what, there remains a bottom line here: there are always more of us than there are of them, and yet they use us for their own purposes. The more confused we are, the easier their job is.

Nothing that happens can be understood outside of an understanding of a Jewish plan to create a one world government, where the entire population of the globe is enslaved to an elite ruling minority.