Wait – you’re telling me this is the picture after the “alleged” photoshop job?

This is some mind-bending shit right there.

I was previously under the impression that a fat girl looked something like this:

Ugh!

While a morbidly obese girl looked more like this:

Burn my eyes with acid, I can’t take this!

But this bitch Rebel Wilson – wow.

I didn’t know it was physically possible for a human being to be this fat.

We’re reaching the twinkie singularity, here, folks.

I had long relegated such a beast to the realm of fantasy or science fiction.

Dune’s Baron Harkonnen had to be infected by some Bene Gesserit poison to get this fat. He couldn’t manage it with twinkies alone.

Australians, for some twisted reason which probably involves a lot of alcohol – heaps of brews, m8 – decided it would be funny to have this vile creature pose for the cover of a magazine.

They presumably then had to hire numerous special effects artists to touch up the resulting pictures to the point where they could legally publish them without being held on trial for crimes against humanity.

And yet, the whale insists that no such trickery is afoot.

Page Six:

Rebel Wilson is defending her Vogue Australia cover after a fan claimed it was Photoshopped to make the actress appear thinner.

“Claimed.”

Nigga, that’s like saying some dude “claimed” that water is wet.

Have you seen this bitch?

“YES!”? More like “NO!”

“They altered the photo. Look at her face and hands. Slimmed down,” the fan tweeted. “Why can’t they just show her in her natural beauty.”

Lol.

As it turns out, the only alterations were made by Wilson herself in real life.

“Nope, not slimmed down! I just ate healthy and exercised for the month before the shoot x but then immediately after ate brownies!” she tweeted in response.

If the she-elephant had the self control to “eat healthy and exercise,” we wouldn’t be having this conversation.

This is like some crackho saying she now has nice teeth because she “just stopped smokin’ crack for three month, teehee!”

No one is buying it.

The “Pitch Perfect 3” star also shared an additional image from the shoot, one that hadn’t been through photo editors’ hands yet.

“Oh and just so you can see the raw v’s the magazine shot, I took a monitor photo myself on the day of the shoot,” Wilson wrote. “So please don’t carry on that these shots are heavily photoshopped because they’re not!”

Oh and just so you can see the raw v’s the magazine shot, I took a monitor photo myself on the day of the shoot! So please don’t carry on that these shots are heavily photoshopped because they’re not! pic.twitter.com/7DcgO4hZ3a

— Rebel Wilson (@RebelWilson) May 22, 2018

Uh huh.

Sure.

Maybe the photographer’s camera has a special lens that can bend space-time into a different continuum where you didn’t eat an entire vat of cookie dough every morning for breakfast.

But Occam’s razor tells me there’s a different explanation for this.

Something that either relies on advanced image manipulation technology, or state of the art makeup techniques and clever manipulation of light and angles.

Under the right lighting and with the right camera angles, even Jabba the Hut could almost pass for human. Almost.

I guess this will remain a mystery forever.

Or, you know, until the next time this skank makes a camera appearance.

The UK government is demanding you think before you shoop or end up in the clink.

We might be headed for a complete and total global meltdown where most people are going to die – but whatever.

We have to shut down internet trolls.

Because feelings come first.

RT:

Internet trolls will face prosecution for certain types of online harassment and abuse, including posting degrading photoshopped images or creating derogatory hashtags, under new legal guidelines.

The new rules, released by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) on Monday, detail an extensive list of examples of online behavior that could result in legal penalties. The updated guidelines attempt to widen police recourse against online abusers and help protect victims.

“The internet’s not an anonymous place where people can post without any consequences. People should think about their own conduct,” Director of Public Prosecutions Alison Saunders told BBC Radio 4.

“If you are grossly abusive to people, if you are bullying or harassing people online, then we will prosecute in the same way as if you did it offline.”

Behavior now classified as criminal activity includes ‘doxxing’ (the publishing of personal information such as home addresses or bank details), encouraging others to retweet grossly-offensive images, and virtual mobbing (encouraging people to harass others online).

Those who humiliate others online by branding them sexually-promiscuous could also face prosecution under the new rules.

What I want to know is this:

Can we call this “Stormer’s Law”?

But here – look what they added:

The guidelines, however, hold that sexting (exchanging sexualized images) between minors of a similar age should not automatically be considered a criminal offense. Instead, the guidelines propose that only cases where, grooming, bullying or exploitation is suspected should the suspects be prosecuted.

What does this part even have to do with the first part?

“Trolling people will offensive memes is now illegal, but we want to make it clear that teenagers are still allowed to send nude pix to each other.”

They always do this. Start with “we have to shut down misogynist-racists-anti-Semites” and then add something like “also ISIS” or in this case “also grooming gangs.”

But they’ve already shown they don’t care about either of these add-ons. They have allowed millions of ISIS agents to flood Europe and they have continually protected and refused to prosecute grooming gangs.

Basically, we live in a completely lawless society where you are allowed to recruit for terrorist groups, rape and traffic little girls, rape women in wheelchairs, ficki ficki sex-attack riot, race riot – whatever – but if you hurt someone’s feelings on the internet, then the entire weight of the state comes down on you like a piano out a tenth storey window.

This newish term “anarcho-tyranny” is very good. Really embodies this weird new paradigm of total lawlessness plus a complete lack of basic freedoms.

But here’s the thing: this really demonstrates just how afraid they are of viral ideas, and the ability of the internet to force-multiply certain concepts which threaten the system. I mean, presumably a system that condones child sex-trafficking isn’t really concerned about people having their feelings hurt by mean pictures, right?

This is about preventing a revolution.

But the revolution cannot be prevented.

Basically, we’ve already won. We won as soon as we started.

Of course, it’s a long way before it’s over. No doubt about that one. The system is dying, but it’s going to bring down all hell when it does.

But no matter how dark the night gets, brothers, always remember:

Our victory is written in the stars.

This only ends one way.

The other night, having finished a long day of reading real news and posting it here on the Daily Stormer, I was looking for some insane gibberish to read as relaxing entertainment, and visited Rense.com.  This highly commercialized disinformation website always has a daily image posted at the top of the page, often something by the schizophrenic conspiracy photoshopper David Dees; these images generally deal with the typical Alex Jones nonsense – Ron Paul vs. the TSA, secret weather-modification machines being used for eugenics, Monsanto brain virus infecting Voltron, or something-whatever.

However, this time I found something different.  Rather than an image dealing with some radical and deranged ‘theory’ based on bits and pieces he read on a web forum, I found a much more personal piece of David Dees’ “art” – an image documenting a secret plan by the government to stack his shoes while he was asleep.

It is difficult to really comment on this, other than to say that I think it very clearly illustrates the general mindset of the typical raving internet conspiracy theorist.  They train themselves to believe that everything in the world is a conspiracy, and this then very quickly becomes a part of their own personal lives.

I can just hear Jones reporting on it: “Folks, the CIA admits that they use infrared scanners to see if you’re taking a nap, and then break into your house and stack your shoes.  I have the documents – it’s all admitted.  They just throw it right in your face.”

The Daily Stormer has a strict policy of not allowing any images by David Dees to be featured on the site, even though I guess he has some decent ones about Jew bankers and the Holohoax.

We do, however, have a soft-spot for Ben Garrison.

Oh, I also found this on Rense:

Seriously, “I shifted to a parallel universe , overcame lyme’s disease and became a millionaire -fast!”

Can you imagine the callousness of someone willing to sell people something like this?  How could you not feel sick inside, abusing the mentally ill in this way?  Can you imagine answering for such a thing after death?

Jeff Rense is a man who pretends to oppose the Jewish occupation, but will switch his views depending on who he is talking to, thus throwing his listeners into a state of permanent confusion.  He hopes to get them confused enough that they will click adds for books about shifting to other dimensions to gain powers to become a millionaire.

I am sick of these shills, and I am sick of the people who defend them as ‘not that bad.’  All of them must be named and blamed for the hurt they are doing to our people.

Related:

The Truth About the Truth Movement: A List of Shills (abridged)

One of the most well-known photo’s from the Hitler era is this one of a woman crying while making the German salute. This photo is published very often, including on the  Wikipedia article on the German ‘occupation’ of Czechoslovakia.

This picture creates the impression that the woman isn’t happy at all with the German takeover of the Sudetenland. That is the impression that the people who show us only this part of a much larger picture want to give us.

Most of the original picture is actually cropped out, leaving us with only the crying woman. Next to this woman we see another woman with a neutral facial expression and a third woman who is obviously extremely happy. Imagine for a moment Wikipedia only showing us the smiling woman. It would give us a totally different understanding of the reunification of Sudetenland.

A second look at this picture tells us even more. We can see some people in the background. Apparently one didn’t have to line up and cheer the German troops. If the crying woman really was so sad, why did she watch the parade at all? Why didn’t she stay at home to cry? It is more likely that she is crying tears of joy!

Some background information:

• Sudetenland had some 3,200,000 Germans and 750,000 Czechs.
• The Allies broke the Versailles treaty by denying these Germans the right of self-determination.
• Czechoslovakia was an artificial state that had only been created in 1918. This was just 20 years before the return to Germany. The majority of the 3.2 million Germans hadn’t been born in “Czechoslovakia”, but in Austrian Silesia.
• After Sudetenland had come heim ins Reich, Poland and Hungary also took over parts of Czechoslovakia. I bet you didn’t learn that at school. Imagine, innocent and peace-loving Poland!
• After the fall of Communism the artificial state was spit up again into the Czech Republic and Slovakia.

As this picture illustrates, Wikipedia and other mainstream, Jewish-controlled media don’t give us the whole picture. No, they crop out the parts that are inconvenient. That’s how they shape the public opinion of the lemmings.

Just look at this video of Hitler and the German troops arriving in Sudetenland and judge for yourself if the crying woman is a fair representation of this moment in history.

Related:

Ye Olde Photoshoppe: Soviet Anti-Nazi Propaganda Fakes