I recently read an article at the Occidental Observer which focused on a Globalist website called ”Project Syndicate” and decided to check it out and see for myself what these scumbags are up to. To get an idea of how highly regarded Project Syndicate is within Globalist circles, master of evil, George Soros, follows just 4 accounts on Twitter, one of them is Project Syndicate, which he also helps fund.

The Occidental Observer describes ”The Syndicate’s” editorial line perfectly:

Project Syndicate’s content, as one might expect, suffers from extreme globalist and anti-nationalist bias, reflecting the U.S. and EU’s current parochial ruling elites. Recurring themes include: Why free trade is unpopular, but absolutely necessary. Why the European Union is unpopular, but absolutely necessary. Why a bellicose foreign policy is unpopular, but absolutely necessary. Why displacement-level immigration and multiculturalism are unpopular, but absolutely necessary. Any deviation from globalist policies is almost invariably portrayed as a supreme moral and a political disaster.

You do have to wonder at the staggering lack of self awareness of the Globalist elite, did nobody point out how deeply sinister and unnerving a title such as ”Project Syndicate” actually is? Their politics is what we might accurately describe as ‘Left Wing’ but up in the stratosphere of the Globalist hierarchy the usual feel-good lefty names such as Hope Not Hate, Black Lives Matter, Refugees Welcome, One Love One Humanity, Rock for Islam and so on, can be dispensed with, the feel good fluff is for the lefty students being pumped out the universities by the million. At the top, the bosses are quite honest about what they are, and that’s a bunch of gangsters running a ‘Syndicate” in private they probably call it ”Our Thing”.

Needless to say, there’s an extraordinarily heavy Jewish presence, from the managing editor down to the writing staff:

The writing staff of Project Syndicate are comprised of banking CEO’s, former heads of state, media moguls and high ranking EU bureaucrats. Jewish ‘intellectual’ Henry Levi is a regular, as is Jew-in-disguise and pro White genocide careerist, Peter Sutherland, Guy Verhofstadt, Joschka Fischer and Javier Solana also write regularly on the need for their own people to be destroyed.  Its editorial team are:

Yes, That Gordon Brown!

Syndicate provides readers with original, engaging, and thought-provoking commentaries by global leaders and thinkers. By offering incisive perspectives from those who are shaping the world’s economics, politics, science, and culture, Project Syndicate has created an unrivaled global venue for informed public debate.

Despite their enormous power, wealth and influence, the Globalist cabal are not a particularly cheerful bunch, indeed, the general tone of their articles can be just as despondent as the comments section of a Nationalist site. The Globalists endlessly kvetch about the ”Rise of Populism” and a ”Return to the past”, there’s a sense they’re becoming exasperated and worn out by the whack-a-mole of managing to see off one small Nationalist party in Europe, only to be confronted by another a few months later. Marie Le Pen looms large in their fears and they’re absolutely terrified of Donald Trump.

The problem for the Globalists is that they only ever have two solutions available to them for any given problem, this is apparent in every article on their site, the solutions they invariably adopt to all problems faced by humanity today are:

1. Increasing transnational governance, whether by creating yet more Globalist institutions or expanding already existing ones. We are dealing with people who write articles called;

Without so much as a blush.

2. Economics is their second cure for the world, economics in tandem with more centralized governmental power.

Take for example this recent article by former Israeli foreign minister, Shlomo Ben-Ami (Yeah he’s Jewish) called ”Populism, Past and Present”:

While populist rhetoric seems to be reaching fever pitch, with far-reaching consequences – most notably the United Kingdom’s vote to “Brexit” the European Union – the reality is that the strain of nativism that it represents has long bedeviled democratic politics.

But, rather than focus on real solutions, today’s populists are often appealing to people’s basest instincts. In many cases, they are emphasizing feelings over facts, stoking fear and hate, and relying on nativist appeals. And, in fact, they are less interested in tackling economic grievances than they are in using those grievances to win support for an agenda that would roll back social and cultural openness.

Former Belgian prime minister and EU fanatic, Guy Verhofstadt recently hissed ”Only more Europe can beat Europe’s Nationalists”

If the EU wants to tackle the strains of nationalism that are undermining its very raison d’être, it will have to listen to people’s concerns and offer a radical new vision for effective governance. Otherwise, the nationalist cancer will spread.

Our concerns, Guy, are you bastards ethnically cleansing us with the Third World who’re raping, bombing and killing us in our own lands, what solution are you offering?

Still, today’s EU is not capable of decisive, large-scale action. To provide an alternative to the emotional appeal of populist nationalism, the Union must become more responsive to its citizens’ demands. This will require radical structural reforms to the eurozone and to the EU’s central political institutions.

Economists generally agree that a single currency without a fiscal union or a common treasury is unsustainable. If Europeans do not finish the job they started when they established the euro, they will continue to experience the economic pain of structural disunity. Complete integration would deliver prosperity and better governance.

Oh….great!.

One of the most recent entries is by Javier Solana, comically contradicting himself, even on his own safe-space straw-man of economics being the primary concern of Europeans, in his piece ”Taming the populists” he writes:

Of course, economic grievances alone do not fuel anti-globalization sentiment; populism has emerged even in countries with low unemployment and rising incomes. But such grievances provide the kernel of truth that populist leaders need to attract support, which they then attempt to secure with distortions and exaggerations.

Solana then goes on to debunk his own argument, the only argument Globalists have:

To be sure, globalization has reduced inequality among countries substantially. But within countries, inequality has risen sharply. The largest gains from globalization have not only accrued to the middle and upper classes in Asia, but also to the top 1% of earners worldwide.

And then of course we get the inevitable:

Moreover, national authorities must engage with one another to improve global governance.

Considering that these people like to promote themselves as ”The world’s foremost intellectuals and thinkers” this is a pitifully weak argument, hopelessly stuck in an utterly materialistic world view, as well they might, that being the standard world view passed by Jews onto gentiles. The Globalists cannot sell the benefits of their Globalism to level headed Europeans because there are non.

What they have instead is Cultural Marxism/Political Correctness and the Left. And so what should be a simple case of White people standing up and saying ”We want non of this, piss off!” White people instead discover, upon standing up, that their Achilles heel has been sliced and that before they even begin to assert their interests they have to check their White Privilege, apologize for slavery, apologize for the Holocaust, apologize for racism and so on.

If the Globalist world view was morally sound and intellectually valid they would not need Political Correctness and White Guilt memes to act as bouncers before a nightclub door, but they are neither sound or valid, they are just lies to be sold as they pillage the world and genocide the White race.

It’s become something of joke when the elites use the word ”populist” in a pejorative sense, meaning it’s morally wrong to be popular. However, from their perspective it’s no joke, because these populists, Trump being the big one, are bringing into question their right to rule us, their right to reshape the world and its populations as they see fit.

Just why do they have that right? from where did it come? upon what does this power rest? in the end it’s just money and media control, nothing else, and it will have to be taken away from them, in the end.

Javier Solana ends his piece with a warning to his fellow parasites:

The victory of the campaign in the United Kingdom to leave the European Union should have jolted all of us from the illusion that we are somehow protected from the risks we see around us. The unthinkable can happen. Populists can win. It is time for national leaders to show that they are paying attention.

In actual fact it isn’t unthinkable, millions of us think about it all of the time and there’ll be people taking note of the names listed on the ”Project Syndicate” site to add to the list of defendants at the ”Nuremberg 2” show trials.

Peter Sutherland, who it was recently revealed – to absolutely no one’s surprise – is a tool of George Soros, is one of the nuttiest chaps on the ethnic cleansing scene.

I guess it’s because he’s goofy and old, he can just get away with saying insane things and people just think he must have said it by accident.

His official title is “UN Special Representative on Migration,” and his stated goal is to flood Europe with as many “migrants” as he can. Even while admitting they are a “burden,” and that no one really wants them, he says they must be taken because of the UN charter and because of some vague moral obligation.

As I often point out, none of these people will ever explain the moral system they are basing their moral declarations on. Morality is an aspect of philosophy (where it is more commonly called “ethics”). Philosophy is not a science, which creates problems with using it to drastically alter society, but there are systems within philosophy which can at least serve as a framework for discussion and debate.

But they won’t even give us that. They just talk about “obligations” without explaining where these obligations came from, and certainly never defining any limits on them.

Peter Sutherland pushes all of this beyond the limits of common decency.

Whereas most within the media and political spheres are arguing for “refugees” – those who are escaping war – to flood Europe and America, he is arguing for “economic migrants” to be allowed to flood our nations.

He gave an interview last week on Morning Ireland, RTÉ Radio 1 where he again stated the position that basically everyone should be allowed in.

There is to be a UN conference on 19 September to promote sharing of refugees.

An Irish-led draft UN declaration on the refugee and migrant crisis will be discussed when world leaders meet at the UN next month.

The long document is “impossible to summarise” but contains phrases such as:

“we acknowledge a shared responsibility to manage large movements of refugees and migrants in a sensitive, humane, compassionate and people-centred manner”

That’s typical Open Society Foundation speak and they are trying shoehorn in stuff about economic migrants in with the refugee issue.

About half way through interviewer Cathal Mac Coille asks Peter Sutherland:

“This draft agreement covers both migrants and refugees. What do you say to people who say “refugees is one thing, although even then there is a limit to how much any one country can take but secondly with economic migrants, there has to be a limit”

Peter Sutherland responds:

“I think it’s fair to say there has to be a limit on economic migrants.

The last couple of months I’ve spent time both in Italy and Greece and particularly in Sicily and I’ve seen that many of those that are in the camps are clearly not persecuted persons who are refugees.

They are economic migrants

The responsibility to take refugees is clear.

Economic migrants do not have an automatic right to move from one country to another and if they were to have open borders, it would be politically unacceptable.

Now I accept that.

The only point I would make about it is that to deal with economic migrants (and they will be coming in huge numbers for decades) we have to have a real system which comprises a couple of points:

1. we have to be prepared to allow more legal migrants as part of an agreement to stop illegal migrants.
2. We have to realise that there are some economic migrants who deserve particular attention and care for example those who are escaping a natural disaster, those who are escaping famine.

They have to be given rights comparable but not the same as those who are escaping persecution. Their lives can be a threat.

So we have to work out a new system which actually works and that requires more than simply erecting borders.

We’ve spent a billion euro over the last couple of years erecting borders in Europe, borders which were meant to be demolished.

Thanks to orlared for writing up that description and partial transcript. He’s a great YouTuber.

Peter Sutherland is from Ireland, and allegedly non-Jewish.

Unsurprisingly, the Jew Soros was directly ordering around the UN migration Chief.

Breitbart:

George Soros’ Open Society Foundation admits influence and incredibly close links with UN migration representative and former Goldman Sachs executive Peter Sutherland in leaked document.

The paper, which told of how the migrant crisis presented an “opportunity” for the foundation to extend its global influence and attract more money, mentions Sutherland’s pro-migrant work. The foundation notes that through Sutherland they have been able to advocate at an “elite level” behind the scenes.

Open Society are one of the contributors to the Columbia Global Policy Initiative (CGPI) which hosts Mr. Sutherland and claim that through Sutherland they are able to influence international migration policy due to the current migrant crisis. On the United Nations website Sutherland is described as a “strong advocate for promoting practical action to increase the benefits of migration” and has routinely made comments against national borders and national sovereignty in Europe. Sutherland has even called for the European Union to “undermine the homogeneity” of member states.

Sutherland has even gone as far as defending all migrants regardless of whether or not they are legitimate refugees saying, “We’re not just talking, either, about refugees. We’re talking about economic migrants, many of whom could be the future, and some at the present… are survival fighters. They’re not to be dismissed as an irrelevance.”

Last Year Sutherland argued that Britain was “xenophobic” because of border controls that stop the flow of migrants from Calais reaching Britain and earlier this year claimed that Brexit was an “act of insanity” and saying, “every independent voice in the world is saying it would be an act of insanity to leave the EU.”

The Open Society International Migration Initiative (IMI) program claims that Sutherland and his team are very closely linked saying, ” IMI’s access to the Sutherland team’s discussions has allowed us to keep civil society partners up-to-date on the latest developments, in order to inform advocacy and campaigning strategies prior to the events and to plan follow up actions.”

IMI also funded the “Sutherland Report” which they claim will, “set the stage for institutional reforms to global migration governance, and to break new ground on protections for migrants outside the asylum system,” or protection for migrants regardless if they qualify for asylum in Europe.

Well, there you have it.

Not that it’s anything we didn’t know.

But it is good to have confirmation.

Basically, this DCLeaks drop shows Soros controlling the entire world. As I have said, it is regrettably that I don’t have time to go through these documents myself, or the money to hire someone to do it, but that is what it is. We are a modest operation.

As such, we are reporting the findings of mainstream news outlets as they are released.

Of course, our readers can go through the documents themselves on the DCLeaks website.

Previous reports have shown Soros manipulating Russia by undermining her traditional value system, funding Black Lives Matter, pushing for Mexican legalization and Syrian refugees in America and funding the global warming swindle.

At a July 12 meeting of the International Organization for Migration in Berlin, Peter Sutherland spilled the beans, openly admitting that they aren’t just planning to “integrate” the so-called “refugees,” but the “economic migrants” as well.

Previously, the governments and various organizations have been claiming either that all of these economic migrants are actually refugees, or that they’re going to eventually send back those determined to be economic migrants.

So props to Sutherland for admitting that this is just a lie.

Of course, the overwhelming majority of the migrants are economic migrants – only one in five is even potentially from Syria, most of them are lying, and most of Syria is now safe anyway. The two biggest groups of migrants are from Pakistan and Afghanistan, neither of which is currently involved in a war. Merkel invited people from anywhere to come, and they came.

This idea that you can allow unlimited “economic migrants” though is completely insane. That effectively means that the entire third world is welcome to come live on welfare in Europe. And probably half of them are going to come – 2.5 billion or so people.

Peter Sutherland, currently the United Nations Special Representative for Migration, told the Irish Times that his first big breakthrough into European politics was all because of the opinions he had.

“I am a strong believer in European integration as the taming of nationalism,” Sutherland said.

“I am absolutely an internationalist, and Garret [FitzGerald, previous President of Ireland] was too. That is what we came together on and why he appointed me to Europe.”

In certain political circles, saying you’re an “internationalist” is code for saying you agree with the ongoing White genocide agenda, in place today – that you agree “diversity” and mass immigration should be used to eliminate majority White countries.

“Obviously if a country and people believe they have been badly done by economic distribution, then the mood towards people coming in [immigration] is going to be negatively impacted,” Sutherland said.

“But I think most arguments against immigrants are based far more on a sense of nativist interests: ‘We are different, we are here, and we don’t want them here.’”

Well, duh! That’s why countries exist in the first place. People want to be around people similar to themselves; this is very simple human nature.

He made his anti-White agenda clear in 2012: “The United States, or Australia and New Zealand, are migrant societies and therefore they accommodate more readily those from other backgrounds than we do ourselves, who still nurse a sense of our homogeneity and difference from others.”

“And that’s precisely what the European Union, in my view, should be doing its best to undermine.”

Anyone who disagrees with his agenda, is apparently “xenophobic“.

And surprise, surprise – he’s good friends with Angela Merkel and The Pope, both of whom sprout the same agenda.

He especially loves what Merkel has done to Germany – he described it as a “tremendous example” to the rest of Europe, but is upset that Sweden did not do the same.

“She [Angela Merkel] has repositioned Germany as a moral leader in Europe.”

“We can’t just have open borders, but do I regret anything she has done? Absolutely not.”

This is how things work in politics – in their eyes, we, the people, are big dummies and our opinions are wrong, while they have the right opinions which must be forced on us.

And what about them? A former colleague of Sutherland supports his political stance, but said if mass immigration goes wrong, the people responsible for it, like Sutherland, can always escape to Switzerland in a gated community for the rich.

“White Genocide for thee, but not for me” – this is the slogan of all those rich White anti-Whites.

Appearing on RTÉ radio, Ireland, Peter Sutherland, the head of Goldman-Sachs International, stated that he believes unlimited African immigration benefits Europe. He made the statements after a meeting with the SJW Pope Francis.

The interviewer asked that given that the current number looks to be around 240,000 entering Europe illegally every year, would there be a point at which the systems were overloaded.

Sutherland replied:

Those figures are laughable in the context of the total European population of 500 million. The figures you are talking about are literally a drop in the ocean. We could easily handle that. Germany could take a lot more and still have a deficiency in terms of its aging population. Today’s population in Germany is over 55% in favor of having more migrants.

Governments have to lead by giving the positive news that migrants are good for a community, economically and every other way rather than constantly expressing them as a burden because they are not really a burden. Within a very short period of time they contribute positively to the community in which they live.

It’s going to take a long time to solve the inherent problems of north Africa and sub-Saharan Africa so we’re going to live with the issue of migration for a very long time.

Peter Sutherland also serves as Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General for International Migration and Development and is was formerly Director General of the World Trade Organization, EU Commissioner for Competition, and Attorney General of Ireland.