While disabled White people are being denied Legal-Aid to challenge the unlawful removal of their disability benefits in Britain, Negro beasts from Ethiopia who have never even set foot in Britain, get all their costs paid for, so that they can sue the British government for sending them Foreign-Aid.

Daily Mail:

An Ethiopian farmer has won permission to use taxpayers’ money to sue the British Government … for sending aid to his homeland.

The case, branded ridiculous by MPs, will be funded entirely by the public even though the farmer has never set foot in this country.

The 33-year-old Ethiopian – granted anonymity to protect his family – says ministers are funding a one-party state in his country that has breached his human rights. He says foreign aid helped the regime inflict ‘brutal treatment’ on thousands of farmers driven from their land, against the International Development Act 2002.

Taxpayers will pay for both the farmer’s lawyers and a defence team from the Department for International Development, in a case that could cost tens of thousands of pounds. This is in addition to the £1.3billion Britain has sent to Ethiopia since 2010.

The farmer lodged the court papers from Kenya, before Justice Secretary Chris Grayling introduced rules to prevent cases being brought by those who have never set foot in the UK. The changes, which come into force next month, will mean anybody seeking legal aid in civil cases must have been resident in Britain for at least 12 months.

A Whitehall source said: ‘Whatever hardships this man has faced, the idea that someone without any connection to this country can get public money to sue the Government borders on the farcical.’

Tory MP Peter Bone, a fierce critic of UK aid policy, said the legal action was ‘bizarre’, adding: ‘This is a ridiculous case and it is ridiculous there is legal aid for it.’ However, he added: ‘If money is going to a corrupt regime and somebody is pointing that out then we should be taking note of it. That is the problem. A lot of the money goes on propping up corrupt regimes.’

It is not clear how the farmer, a father of six identified only as O, came to bring the case. Papers lodged earlier this year state he had to leave his family and flee to a refugee camp in Kenya after being beaten and tortured trying to protect his land. The UK has contributed to a £510million Protection of Basic Services fund which has allegedly ‘contributed’ to the programme of displacing the farmers.

O is not personally seeking compensation, but wants the Government to change its aid policies and stop bankrolling brutal regimes. If he succeeds, ministers could be forced to review donations to other nations accused of atrocities, such as Pakistan and Rwanda.

This is even after they have been told that the groups they are giving it to offer only poor, or average value for money. A full sixth of the money goes to the EU, as instead of the money going directly to the hopeless cause, it has to pass through a middleman first. Instead of calling for an end to this waste of taxpayers money, MPs are suggesting giving it to charities instead.

No doubt the MPs involved are also on the pay roll as the directors of the charities.

I have an idea – why not spend the Foreign Aid money into our own economy, using our own poor as the middlemen? You could raise the standard of living and boost the economy that way and the foreigners would finally have to learn to look after themselves.

From Daily Mail:

Ministers have handed out billions in foreign aid even after being told that much of it is being wasted, it can be revealed.

Since the election, the Department for International Development (DfID) has given £3.3 billion to 12 organisations that offer ‘poor’ or ‘average’ value for money.

Five have been judged by civil servants to offer ‘poor’ value for money. The other seven, including the European Commission, are deemed ‘average’. Shockingly, DfID has increased funding for five of the groups.

The revelation will further anger Tory backbenchers who vehemently disagree with David Cameron’s decision to give 0.7 per cent of the country’s output in aid.

They say it is unfair that British people are suffering cuts to public services and defence budgets while money is being poured into ineffective multilateral bodies.

Yesterday it emerged that Britain spent £10.6 billion on overseas aid in 2013, an increase of 28 per cent on the previous year. We are second only to the US in terms of development cash being handed out.

Conservative MP Peter Bone said: ‘Because they are so determined to meet the 0.7 per cent target, there has been no time to hand out money based on need.

‘So they have been in a rush to give it to organisations that are below value for money – and that’s just crazy.

‘The best way to get value for money is to give funds directly to charities and not dole it out to organisations. Aid policy is now based on targets, not need, and that’s disappointing.’

The biggest beneficiary of Britain’s aid budget is the European Commission, which has been given £2.4 billion in the past three years.

Last year aid minister Alan Duncan said DfID was ‘forced’ to give a sixth of its aid budget to the EU and was powerless over how it was spent.