The new year is off to a strong start, lads.

We’ve got already got our next pizza-related scandal brewing. Unprompted and completely unexpectedly, renowned but retarded Russian Jew economist and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman decided to reveal his kiddie porn stash to Twitter and then blame Trump-hackers for it.

(The tweet has since been deleted; here’s the original link and archive.)

Yikes. No one is retarded enough to buy that nonsensical boomer explanation, Paul.

Fox News:

New York Times columnist Paul Krugman is appearing to be having technical difficulties as he acknowledged Wednesday on Twitter that his IP address had been “compromised” and used to “download child pornography.”

“Well, I’m on the phone with my computer security service, and as I understand it someone compromised my IP address and is using it to download child pornography,” Krugman wrote in the tweet. “I might just be a random target. But this could be an attempt to Qanon me. It’s an ugly world out there.”

Qanon is a reference to the group of conspiracy theorists who in recent years spread incriminating myths against many high-profile Democrats on social media.

It’s funny how he tried to make a verb out of QAnon as if some Trump fans are running around willy-nilly planting CP on random Jews’ computers. All this proves is that Paul Krugman does not understand economics or what QAnon is. But I feel like I’ve seen this before.

Another Jew from the NYT was involved in a similar scandal a while back involving gross Japanese cartoon pornography. He posted a screenshot showing a hentai tab on his computer, then proceeded to give the highly believable excuse that he was looking at tentacle porn with his family.

Sigh. Ok, I'm a dumbass. Believe it or not, my kids & I were trying to convince my wife that "tentacle porn" existed. I tried to find…(1)

— Kurt Eichenwald (@kurteichenwald) June 8, 2017

Needless to say, everyone was convinced by his explanation, and the issue was laid to rest then and there.

Now, it’s Paul Krugman’s turn to do some ‘splaining.

Presumably, Krugman is about to get hit with child porn charges, or else he wouldn’t have volunteered this information. And presumably, it was his lawyer who told him to delete the tweet. Because deleting a tweet like that is never a good move unless you’re legally advised to do so.

No one ever comes back from child porn charges.

Remember the guitarist from The Who?

Yeah, I didn’t think so. He got totally buried. Even though he was cleared of the charges.

Krugman is an economist, so he should have gone with the libertarian defense and claimed he thought the children had consented.

He’d still get fired from the New York Times and banned from his regular appearances on television, but at least he could get a job at the Cato Institute after his legal battle.

So I was watching this clip of the Jewish economist and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman.

He says:

The craziness really comes from cultural, ethnic issues more than anything else because you have a, uh, a lot of the real craziness comes like from rural white Americans who feel that they’re losing their country, they’re losing ownership of their country. And they’re right. We are becoming more diverse, more multicultural. And they are, in the end, they become, they’re not the future. In the end the power they still have will go away. But it’s a very difficult time until then.

And I’m just sitting here watching this and I’m like “how is it even possible that every single day, multiple times a day, white men are not shooting up banks, television studios, Hollywood studios, universities and every other center of Jewish power?”

How are they not setting off car bombs outside of Silicon Valley corporations?

How are there no targeted assassinations by rooftop snipers?

How are we not in the middle of a massive terrorist uprising?

How is there not a war on the street? 

How is it possible that these Jews are able to go on television and say “we are completely replacing you in your own country, we are taking away all of your power, eventually you will have nothing at all, and we are right in the middle of this process, just pushing through and trying to finish it up” and people are not staging a massive violent uprising across the entire country?

Look, friends – I’m a pacifist.

I’m not encouraging anything here. Lord knows.

I’m just asking from a merely practical standpoint – how is the entire population of this country just sitting by and letting the Jews do this to us, while we can all see them doing this to us, while they are out there in public bragging that they are doing this to us?

I’m simply asking: How is it physically possible for a people to simply sit by and watch themselves be exterminated like this? 

Why is no one really, really, really mad?

When Jews are talking about dispossessing whites, they get a weird, shifty, sideways look; an air of furtiveness that, no doubt at some subconscious level, betrays a consciousness of guilt.

Jewish economist Paul Krugman: "They [white people] are…in the end…are not the future [in America]".

Remember he is not predicting the future, he Is telling you what the plan is. Looks like at 0:30 he's itching to say "become obsolete" but catches himself. #WhiteGenocide pic.twitter.com/kh9uCKwfg8

— Will IV (@adangerousgoy) September 18, 2018

Yes. Because of course.

I hate all Jews.

I have special types of hatred for different ones though. It’s hard to even describe the hate I have for Paul Krugman. He is the OG master of the smarmy, reality inverting Jewish lie.

You can picture Hitler himself rage-quitting a debate with this guy.

New York Times:

The speed of America’s moral descent under Donald Trump is breathtaking. In a matter of months we’ve gone from a nation that stood for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness to a nation that tears children from their parents and puts them in cages.

What’s almost equally remarkable about this plunge into barbarism is that it’s not a response to any actual problem. The mass influx of murderers and rapists that Trump talks about, the wave of crime committed by immigrants here (and, in his mind, refugees in Germany), are things that simply aren’t happening. They’re just sick fantasies being used to justify real atrocities.

And you know what this reminds me of? The history of anti-Semitism, a tale of prejudice fueled by myths and hoaxes that ended in genocide.

…

There is a highly technical debate among economists about whether low-education immigrants exert a depressing effect on the wages of low-education native-born workers (most researchers find that they don’t, but there is some disagreement).

Bullshit.

No economist, anywhere, would claim that an increase in labors does not drive down the value of labor. The people who claim that are Jewish liars.

It is the most uncomplicated thing in the world.

Krugman goes on to say that Latinos commit fewer crimes than white people, which I’m not even going to dignify with a response.

Then he does his bit.

The bit.

I don’t know what drives such people — but we’ve seen this movie before, in the history of anti-Semitism.

The thing about anti-Semitism is that it was never about anything Jews actually did. It was always about lurid myths, often based on deliberate fabrications, that were systematically spread to engender hatred.

So Krugman – are you claiming to have not written this article I’m reading right now? 

Okay.

Deep breath. 

Firstly, “Blood Libel” – what the Jews refer to all the times they were caught kidnapping and sacrificing white children as – is not “libel.” Jews did kidnap and sacrifice children.

They were caught doing this by every single country in Europe, over a period of hundreds of years.

Mostly around Easter time, as part of the ritual is to reenact the murder of Christ.

Many of the cases are well documented.

Their argument that it is “libel” is basically “nuh uh.”

Recently, an Israeli Jew wrote a book explaining it was real.

Similarly, Hermann Strack, a German and one of the most famous Christian historians of Jewish history and literature, also wrote a book on how it was real (after he had previously denied it).

Historically, it was simply accepted as fact, because they just got caught so often doing it.

Applying this to claims of immigrant crimes is… it’s hard to know where to even begin with that.

The basic thing that this kike is doing is reversing the moral responsibility of the actions of these immigrants onto us. This is the forever Jewish defense of themselves – that any response to their behavior is an initiation of aggression.

No one told these immigrants to come to America.

They are doing something TO US.

They have actively made a decision to transgress against us. They were the initiators of the incidents.

The underlying theory presented by Krugman is that only white people posses agency, so only they are capable of aggressing. A brown person is only something that can be aggressed upon, because it does not have agency, and all of its behaviors are a result of some circumstance it has no control over.

That is at the core of it.

And yes, this is similar to the way Jews view themselves: they view themselves as incapable of doing wrong, so anything which is done to them cannot possibly be in response to anything that they’ve done. It must be an act of aggression.

Lying about the actual behavior of the immigrants: it’s just a lie. That is simple. But transferring the responsibility for immigrants coming to our country is a high level Jewish manipulation.

It’s a similar trick to blame Trump for the children being in cages, the families being separated: the reason the immigrants are being locked up at all is that Trump is presently not allowed to immediately deport illegal immigrants. If the Border Patrol was simply allowed to pick them up, put them in a van, and drive them back across the border, no one would ever be locked up, no family would ever be separated. I’m very certain we could make sure they all ride in the van together.

I’m trying to demonstrate something important here.

Everyone knows that Jews lie.

But it is not always clearly understood how they lie. As it is very often much more than simply stating false information.

In this 2014 interview (beginning ~6:00) Paul Krugman, commenting on the “craziness” of American politics, says (more or less verbatim): A lot of the craziness comes from cultural/ethnic issues—rural White Americans who feel they are losing their country, and they are right. They are losing their country. In the end, the power they now have will go away, but it’s a very difficult and dangerous time until then. The future is represented by Mayor Bill DeBlasio of New York, “but Ted Cruz of Texas is still out there.”

This I think sums up elite/left opinion in America (after all, Krugman writes for the New York Times) and the West generally. The bad old days are nearly behind us with people like Bill De Blasio and his mixed-race family firmly ensconced in positions of power and presiding over super-diverse New York City. They are the wave of the future. The road ahead will be manageable, although dangerous and difficult. The key to the non-crazy future as envisioned by Krugman is to lessen White power. (Another example: Joe Klein writing in Time that it is necessary to import millions of non-Whites as a cure for “our poisonous biracial era.”)

Krugman specifically mentions rural Whites, the people who for decades have been the bogeymen of Jewish political imagination in America. This quote from Terry Cooney’s book on the New York Intellectuals (a Jewish intellectual movement) sums it up:

[The New York Intellectuals associated rural America with] nativism, anti-Semitism, nationalism, and fascism as well as with anti-intellectualism and provincialism; the urban was associated antithetically with ethnic and cultural tolerance, with internationalism, and with advanced ideas. . . . The New York Intellectuals simply began with the assumption that the rural—with which they associated much of American tradition and most of the territory beyond New York—had little to contribute to a cosmopolitan culture. . . . By interpreting cultural and political issues through the urban-rural lens, writers could even mask assertions of superiority and expressions of anti-democratic sentiments as the judgments of an objective expertise.[1]

Jewish political strategizing at least since the end of World War II has always been about overcoming the power of White America, and particularly rural White America—hence the strong support and activism on behalf of non-White immigration and support for other constituencies that have different ethnic interests than Whites (e.g., Blacks, Latinos) or Whites who have been convinced not to identify with White interests (many White feminists and White LGBT, as well as the legions of Whites who personally benefit from the anti-White revolution, and of course White victims of the constant barrage of media propaganda). The process of disempowering White America, inaugurated with the 1965 immigration law, has been in place for 5 decades and is on the verge of success.

I disagree with Krugman’s analysis somewhat. It’s not just about rural White America. It’s about disempowering non-Bill DeBlasio White America, and that’s a lot more than just rural Whites. In the 2014 elections, Whites of all social classes, all age categories, and both sexes voted Republican. These voters would be a lot more likely to vote for Ted Cruz in 2016 than they would for Hilary Clinton.

It’s interesting that Ted Cruz has been pretty much the only Republican candidate who is not attacking Donald Trump for his comments on immigration and John McCain, presumably because he sees himself as appealing to the same constituency—White voters fed up with spineless politicians who prostrate themselves before the ethnic lobbies and who champion whatever views their pollsters tell them to.

Really though, the Paul Krugmans of the world have little to fear from Cruz given his strong support for expanded legal immigration (and he’s hopeless on Israel). Their longed for demographic changes will go ahead as scheduled under a Cruz administration, maybe not quite so quickly.

But unfortunately, that may well be the case with a Trump presidency as well. On July 13, Michael Cohen, “Special Counsel to Donald Trump,” claimed in an interview with CNN that “Donald Trump is a champion for legal immigrants.” Peter Brimelow notes that at a recent speech in Phoenix Trump “hinted” at support for increased legal immigration.

So in my nightmare scenario, the Republicans nominate a populist candidate who appeals to the Republican base, and he is elected. There’s huge optimism among these (overwhelmingly White) voters that we finally have a president who will “take back the country” and actually say what these voters are thinking. They finally elected someone who will destroy the scourge of political correctness. And it all happened despite an unrelenting outpouring of hostility and predictions of an imminent fascist takeover that rained down daily from the New York Times and the rest of the mainstream media.

And then President Cruz/Trump expands legal immigration with the enthusiastic support of the Republican Congress. After all, they certainly wouldn’t want to be called racists, and besides businesses benefit from cheap labor. Plus we get a war with Iran.

Paul Krugman et al., for all their sputtering about the difficult and dangerous times ahead, have nothing to fear from Cruz/Trump. Unless, of course, like Obama on Israel, this president who won as a populist actually does the right thing after saying whatever he has to to be elected. We can hope.

[1] Terry A. Cooney, The Rise of the  New York Intellectuals: Partisan Review and Its Circle (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1934–1945), 267-268.