I spend a lot of time thinking about the situation facing white people in America and around the world. It’s pretty dire. We built up societies utilizing technology and social structures that allowed our people to lead pretty comfortable and potentially meaningful lives, at least compared to any other time or place in history. There was a certain amount of outside contribution to the technology and social structures, but for the most part they were developed by white people. Some will say that whites exploited others in the development of our societies, and there is some truth in that, but whites also contributed hugely to the betterment of the lives of people all over the world. On balance, we have no reason to apologize.

Other societies have tried to adopt our technology and social structures, but only a small handful in east Asia have really been successful. For the residents of the rest of these countries, the ticket to a better life often seems to be transplanting themselves to a white country. Many individual immigrants do well for themselves and may be seen as contributing to their new countries, but as groups the immigrants tend to be tremendous burdens, and ungrateful ones at that.

In the most recent Stormfront Radio show, I proposed three future scenarios.

1. A continuation of Jewish rule, resulting in the eventual replacement of whites as the majority population in our countries, which will decay into dysfunctional societies where whites are a mistreated minority (modern South Africa comes to mind).
2. The triumph of Trumpism, where the constitutional order will be maintained and Jewish power will be pushed back enough to halt large-scale immigration and at least considerably slow down and limit the transformation of our demographics and culture (something along the lines of Putin’s Russia), or
3. A hard fascist backlash where whites abandon Constitutional constraints and their traditional social morality and place the top priority on ethnic survival (as Hitler’s Germany unsuccessfully attempted).

After the show, suddenly the image of Dr. Seuss’s “Thidwick the Big-Hearted Moose” came to mind.

When a small beetle asked the moose if he could hitch a ride on his antlers, Thidwick said “sure,” as the beetle’s presence was too insignificant to adversely impact his activities. But the beetle invited a spider, who invited a bird, who built a nest and brought his wife, who invited a woodpecker who drilled holes that became homes for squirrels, and so on and so forth until an entire menagerie burdened his antlers to the point that his ability to survive was put to the test.

Of course, at any point along the way, Thidwick could have refused and gotten rid of the pests, but he was afraid of being called a bad host. He continued to tolerate them, and even recognized their property rights in his antlers because they had become homes to his pests. This really seems reminiscent of the chain immigration that 1965 immigration act made possible. Quite clairvoyant, as Thidwick was written in 1948.

Towards the end of the book, Thidwick is faced with the seasonal scarcity of moose moss on the north side of the lake and decides to swim across the lake to where his food source will be in greater supply. The pests object, because they feel at home on the north side of the lake and seem oblivious to the fact that their livelihoods are dependent on the well being of their host moose. They propose settling the question democratically. By now their numbers have been bolstered by a bobcat, a turtle, three mice, a fox, a bear, and 362 bees, and Thidwick is defeated in a landslide.

Thidwick seems resigned to accepting his eventual demise by starvation when a more immediate existential threat presents itself: hunters. Suddenly Thidwick goes hard fascist and saves himself without concern for the pests. He quickly remembers he can shed his antlers and swims off to the other side of the lake, leaving his antler-dwelling pests to face the hunters alone. Thidwick lives happily ever after with other moose.

What happens to his multi-cultural freeloaders?

“His old horns today are where you knew they would be. His guests are still on them, all stuffed, as they should be.”

Yes, Thidwick, and Dr. Seuss by extension, let them all get killed. A happy ending? That was the intention.

So was Dr. Seuss full on Nazi? Contrary to what many think, he (his real name was Theodore Seuss Geisel) was ethnic German and not Jewish. On the other hand, he wrote plenty of books that had a liberal message regarding integration, the Holocaust, Hitler and whatnot. But really, who cares what Dr. Seuss thought. The point is that we are a moose with a bunch of pests living in our antlers. What do we do about it?

We don’t need to wait till the very last minute to deal with our burden. Thidwick could have refused to allow the pests to board his antlers. He could have demanded that those who misbehave leave. He could have demanded they pay their fair share of rent. If you look at the antlers as a metaphor for the Constitutional society, there were things Thidwick could have done short of abandoning his antlers, an option that would still remain in his back pocket as a last resort. But he did nothing until faced with immediate doom.

Getting back to my three scenarios, I hear many calling for fascism now. Given that countless people in “polite society” are open communists of one sort or another, I see nothing wrong with de-stigmatizing fascism. But realistically our people are a long, long way from embracing fascism. Trumpism, on the other hand, with its roots in the elimination of political correctness, could open the way for an awakening that would overturn Jewish domination of our society. Free from Jewish domination, solutions to our problems possibly could be found without resorting to the violence and dislocation that would likely accompany an abandonment of the Constitutional order. This depends to a large extent on what we do. If one thing has become clear in the past five months, it is that Trump provides us with political space, but not political leadership. The fate of Trumpism is in our hands, not his.

If Trumpism fails, we still have scenario three in our back pocket, and potentially could have laid considerable groundwork for an new society.

But scenario three is fraught with danger. It didn’t turn out so well for Hitler and Germany.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. left, with US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson in Moscow on Wednesday. Tillerson is on a fool’s errand. Is he the right man for the job?

Things are coming to a head. Tillerson is in Moscow. He has spent time in Moscow in the past doing business as head of Exxon Mobile. He knows Putin, and to know Putin is to respect Putin. While it had been reported that he would only meet with Foreign Minister Lavrov and not President Putin, he did meet with President Putin. All hope is not lost.

CNN:

US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson is meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow, as a diplomatic rift between the two nations deepens over a chemical attack in Syria.

The meeting is taking place at the Kremlin along with Tillerson’s counterpart, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, the US State Department and Putin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov confirmed.

The talks come after Lavrov issued Tillerson a warning Wednesday against any further US strikes on the Syrian regime.

…

The two top diplomats had sat down together earlier in the day to work through the fallout of last week’s chemical attack in northwestern Syria, which plunged the old Cold War enemies to a new low.

…

Putin said in an interview with state-run MIR television earlier Wednesday that relations with the US had deteriorated.

“The working level of confidence in Russian-American relations, especially at the military level, under the administration of Donald Trump, has not improved, but rather worsened.”

A White House memo to the press last week mentioned a meeting between Putin and Tillerson had been scheduled, but the Kremlin appeared to have rolled back on the talks as the Syria rift worsened.

Putin has traditionally met with the US Secretary of State on their visits to Moscow. And Tillerson and Putin are no strangers — Putin in 2013 awarded the Order of Friendship to Tillerson when he was CEO of ExxonMobil, the highest honor Russia gives to foreigners.

For the Kremlin to have previously announced that Putin would not meet with Tillerson was a snub designed to send a message. The fact that he is now meeting with Tillerson means that he has a very blunt message to send to President Trump that must arrive unfiltered and undiluted. Trump better listen.

Putin is OUR GUY now.

Lavrov gave Tillerson an icy welcome Wednesday, diving straight into Moscow’s grievances with Washington in what would usually be warm opening remarks.

Russia “saw some very troubling actions regarding the attack on Syria,” he said, according to an official Russian interpreter.

“We believe it is fundamentally important not to let these actions happen again.”

The White House on Tuesday accused Russia and Syria of carrying out a confusion campaign over who was responsible for the chemical attack. Russian President Vladimir Putin has made comparisons between the US response and its 2003 intervention in Iraq, calling it a “tedious” story.

The deaths have been widely blamed on Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime, but Russia has denied the regime carried out the attack.

Notice that fake news CNN used the passive voice “have been widely blamed” as a way of avoiding presenting a single shred of evidence that Assad has any responsibility for the “gassing of babies,” which would make absolutely no sense unless he woke up one day and said to himself “I have been struggling to save my country from vicious terrorist invaders for the past six years and am now on the verge of victory. Maybe I should just let ISIS and Israel take over the country after all…”

As laughable as it seems, the “U.S. intelligence community” is basing its advice to Trump on ISIS Twitter and on YouTube videos uploaded by anti-Assad terrorists.

Lavrov also complained about the mixed messages coming out of Washington on the Trump administration’s policy on Syria, with the US envoy to the UN, Nikki Haley, making clear Assad should have no future in Syria as Tillerson took a softer line.

Nimrata Randhawa has no future in America.

“I will be frank that we had a lot of questions regarding a lot of very ambiguous as well as contradictory ideas on a whole plethora of bilateral and international agenda coming from Washington,” Lavrov said.

He hit back at remarks Tillerson made a day earlier that Russia would have to decide whether it was with the US and the West in standing up against Assad, or against them, describing the comments as “wrong choices.”

…

It was a hostile start to the long-awaited meeting, which began with the two men entering a conference room making very little eye contact.

…

Washington has said that Russia and Syria are trying to “confuse the world community about who is responsible for using chemical weapons against the Syrian people in this and earlier attacks.”Russia claims the Syrian regime is being unfairly blamed for the chemical attack, and on Wednesday Putin said that the attack was “simply staging” and a provocation, in his interview with MIR.

Putin suggested on Monday that forces within Syria were plotting more chemical attacks, including near Damascus, that they intended to pin on the Syrian regime.

Moscow earlier claimed that the deaths had been caused when a Syrian regime airstrike hit a chemical weapons stockpile held by terrorist groups.

It is so obvious that Trump is being Jewed into a war for Israel and its ISIS proxy. Even a substantial number of the American sheeple can see this, despite saturation propaganda by CNN and the rest of the Zio media. Nobody knows what is going through Trump’s mind. Let’s just hope that OUR GUY Putin can get Tillerson to take the message of sanity back to Trump.

Following the chemical attack, US President Donald Trump ordered a Tomahawk missile strike against the Shayrat airfield in Syria, from where the US says the aircraft took off to launch the attack.

The US claims the strike destroyed 20% of Syria’s operational aircraft, a figure disputed by Russia’s Defense Ministry.

But the White House has also caused a great deal of confusion — the US position on Syria is still woefully unclear, as Trump has made no comprehensive statement on Syria since last week’s missile attack. He has made some comments to Fox News on Syria, saying he did not plan for the US to be drawn fully into the Syrian war.

White House press secretary Sean Spicer has said that the Trump administration would respond if the Assad regime used barrel bombs against his own people, something that has been a regular occurrence in the six-year civil war. Aides later clarified that this “did not signal a change in administration policy.”

Haley, the UN envoy, said removing Assad from power was a priority, whereas Tillerson said he merely “hoped” the Syrian people would choose to oust Assad and reiterated that defeating ISIS was the US’ first priority in Syria.

US Defense Secretary James Mattis has said that while defeating ISIS was first priority, further use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime would not be tolerated and could warrant additional military action.

“If they use chemical weapons, they are going to pay a very, very stiff price,” Mattis told reporters during his first Pentagon briefing as secretary.

The fact is that the Trump Administration does not have a policy. It has a power struggle, and right now the same Zionist neocon Jews, who were the biggest Never Trumpers during the election, seem to have the upper hands.

Heads must roll.

But whose?

If Bannon is out, that would likely mean a complete derailment of the Trump Train. Hopefully Tillerson will bring back a persuasive message from OUR GUY.