Back in 2010, sickening feminist man-hater Helen Reece from the London School of Economics was demanding Home Secretary Theresa May relax laws so that pedophiles could adopt children.

The Telegraph told us that her twisted logic for this vile and evil suggestion was that once a pervert has served their sentence, it should be assumed that they are no longer a threat.

“There is no reason why all sex offenders should not be considered as potentially suitable to adopt or foster children, or work with them.

“The Vetting and Barring Scheme and other legislative measures single out sex offenders for unfair special treatment and they destroy the principle that a prisoner pays his or her debt, by serving their sentence before re-entering society on equal terms.”

Apparently protecting children from predatory pedophiles goes against the human rights of child rapists, who may want to work with children or adopt them. Preventing them from doing so, leaves the government open to being sued by the perverts.

How could anyone trust a government that entertains ideas such as this, with running a child abuse enquiry?

Not surprisingly, the Daily Mail informs us today that many of the victims of historic child sex abuse at the hands of establishment pedophiles have now given up on the government listening to them.

Twenty-three of the victims that were supposed to be taking part in the enquiry have now written to the same Home Secretary that ordered the pedophile adoption review back in 2010 to say that the enquiry is not fit for purpose and they will not be taking part.

This comes after the last two heads of the enquiry were sacked for being too closely connected to the pedophile politicians involved.

Back when homosexuality was illegal and rejected by society as degenerate and perverse, it was common practice for our enemies to put homosexuals in positions of power, because they could then be blackmailed with the evidence of their perversity into doing their bidding.

With the gradual acceptance of homosexuality by the brainwashed grazers it became necessary to find prospective politicians that were inclined to behave in ways far more sick and twisted than just sodomy.

Some of these pedophile politicians are now being exposed, but unfortunately the majority of those now in the spotlight are dead already and unable to give evidence on their superiors.

Daily Mail:

Two retired detectives have reportedly backed claims that young boys were murdered by politicians at paedophile orgies.

The claims, said to be in new written statements handed to the Metropolitan Police, have emerged just a week after a witness called ‘Nick’ claimed he saw a Tory MP throttle a 12-year-old boy to death.

Scotland Yard has already confirmed it is examining a ‘possible homicide’ committed 30 years ago by a paedophile ring whose ranks included senior Establishment figures.

The revelation came as the Home Secretary Theresa May admitted the recent spate of child abuse allegations were only the ‘tip of the iceberg’.

The Home Secretary, speaking on the BBC’s Andrew Marr show this morning, said it was crucial for society to ‘get to the truth’ of what happened in the 1970s and 1980s.

But Mrs May told the BBC’s Andrew Marr show she was determined that the issues would be fully investigated.

She said: ‘We must as a society, I believe, get to the truth of that and because I think what we’re seeing is frankly – what we’ve already seen revealed – is only the tip of the iceberg on this issue.’

It came as Scotland Yard chief Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe insisted police are taking claims ‘seriously’ and promised there will be no cover-up.

He said: ‘We have got 40 detectives looking into these relatively new claims. There are a series of claims over a relatively long period of time and not all of them are linked, although in the public’s imagination they may be.

‘We have now had more recently this discussion or these claims about murder and, of course, that makes it even more serious.’

Background information on Elm Guest House can be found here.

The unexpected resignation of the warmongering Foreign Secretary William Hague is of course welcome. But does the timing of Hague’s departure hold clues as to why he’s gone?

This website has previously highlighted the facts of Hague’s close connection with his former flatmate, Alan Duncan, the openly gay Tory MP who Hague used to run the secret Foreign Office team that worked with oil-trading giant Vitol to help fund the jihadist rebels who overthrew Libya’s President Gadhafi and plunged his once stable country in chaos.

Hague was introduced to Tory politics as a precocious 16 year-old. He was groomed for high office early on and was a long-term associate of Leon Brittan, even ‘inheriting’ his seat in the Commons, Richmond in North Yorkshire.

Rumours have swirled around Brittan for decades, as is shown by this old cover of Private Eye. More recently, of course, it is Brittan who is now exposed as having ‘forgotten’ about the VIP paedophile dossier handed to him by campaigning Conservative MP Geoffrey Dickens.

Flatmates

Young William went on to share a flat with Alan Duncan, not just once but actually moving with him several times. One of the flats later used by Hague was in the notorious Dolphin Square complex, where residents have spoken of finding young rent boys wandering around lost and asking for the addresses of one or other of the number of MPs who live there.

In the 1990′s the now-defunct Scallywag journal, published details of a vile boy brothel being used there by politicians and other VIPs. Details are, fortunately, still easily found online.

In early September 2010, a number of newspapers including The Daily Telegraph, The Independent and Daily Mail published stories about the fallout from allegations surrounding Hague’s friendship with 25-year-old Christopher Myers, a history graduate from Durham University whom he employed as a parliamentary special adviser. A spokesperson stated that “Any suggestion that the Foreign Secretary’s relationship with Chris Myers is anything other than a purely professional one is wholly inaccurate and unfounded.”

On 1 September 2010, Myers resigned from his position in the light of the press allegations. The media stories led Hague to make a public statement, in which he confirmed that he had “occasionally” shared a hotel room with Myers, but described as “utterly false” suggestions that he had ever been involved in a relationship with any man.

A spokesperson for the Prime Minister, David Cameron, reported that he offered his “full support” over the media rumours. However, a number of figures from both within and without the Conservative Party criticised Hague for his personal response to the stories. Former Conservative leadership candidate John Redwood suggested that Hague showed “poor judgement”,] whilst Labour-supporting Speaker’s wife Sally Bercow commented that Hague had been give “duff PR advice”. Hague’s political colleague and long-term friend, the Conservative MP and government minister Alan Duncan, described the media coverage as “contemptible”.

Now, if Hague was introduced to homosexuality as a vulnerable and starstruck young boy in the thoroughly abnormal atmosphere of the Tory party hierarchy, that would actually make him a victim rather than a perpetrator. And if any MP, or anyone else for that matter, happens to swing both ways then it’s really no business of anyone else.

But what Hague, Duncan and the rest of the neo-con Tory party did in Libya and then Syria was criminal, and if a secret sex-partners ring in some way assisted them in their conspiracy to use British arms and power to destabilise the Middle East (and Russia, for that matter) in pursuit of the neo-con Project for the New American Century agenda, then such ‘private’ affairs take on a very public significance.

Anti-Russian ‘Gay Mafia’

It is certainly true that the gentile intellectual element of the neo-con movement involves a vastly disproportionate number of young homosexual intellectuals, and it also appears that part of the reason for their eager adoption of the anti-Russian agenda of their US/Zionist paymasters is their belief that Putin’s stance against homosexual propagandising of Russian children means that he is ‘anti-gay’.

Similarly, while what politicians get up to in private is their own affair, if we find closet homosexuals or their close and possibly straight friends involved in decisions which look to an objective observer like cover-ups for the (disproportionately large) paedophile wing of the homosexual movement in a succession of care home scandals, then what was purely a private matter again becomes of huge public importance.

Collectively, the British Establishment not only failed the mainly female victims of Muslim grooming gangs, but also the huge numbers of young boys who were abused in children’s homes from Rochdale to Bryn Alyn and Bryn Estyn to Haute de la Garonne in Jersey.

Cover up

There is, for example, not a shred of doubt that various high ranking Tories colluded to cover up the fact that Peter Morrison MP, Thatcher’s close friend  and aide was named by children in the North Wales children’s homes as being a  child abuser linked to an elite  paedophile ring.

In 1996, Hague, the then Secretary of State for Wales, ordered a Tribunal of Inquiry into allegations of hundreds of cases of child abuse in care homes in former county council areas of Clwyd and Gwynedd between 1974 and 1990. Sir Ronald Waterhouse QC, a retired High Court judge, was appointed to head the inquiry.

The inquiry began in January 1997. The tribunal sat for 203 days, and heard evidence directly from 250 witnesses. The volume of evidence taken and the serious of allegations within, led to a 12-month delay in publication of the report to the Welsh Secretary until October 1999. The final report ran to over 500,000 words, and contained 700 allegations of abuse involving 170 individuals

The findings were published in February 2000, as Lost In Care – The Waterhouse Report. The report concluded that there was: “Widespread sexual abuse of boys occurred in children’s residential establishments in Clwyd between 1974 and 1990. There were some incidents of sexual abuse of girl residents in these establishments but they were comparatively rare.”

As well as physical abuse and the unacceptable use of force,[11] there was “widespread sexual abuse, including buggery.” The public version of the report named and criticised almost 200 people, for either abusing children or failing to offer them sufficient protection. Although it identified 28 alleged perpetrators, many names were redacted due to either pending prosecutions or lack of evidence.

The report stated:

“The evidence before us has disclosed that for many children who were consigned to Bryn Estyn, in the 10 or so years of its existence as a community home, it was a form of purgatory or worse from which they emerged more damaged than when they had entered and for whom the future had become even more bleak.”

Supressed report

Throughout that time, neither Hague nor any other high-ranking Minister of any party made any attempt to force the publication of the long-supressed Jillings Report. This had been commissioned in March 1994 by Clwyd County Council and was undertaken by a panel headed by John Jillings, a former director of social services with Derbyshire County Council. The panel of Jillings, Professor Jane Tunstall and Gerrilyn Smith met with considerable opposition:

The then newly appointed North Wales Chief Constable refused to meet them or help with access to the police major-incident database.  This resulted in the need to collect 70 duplicate and additional witness statements.

130 boxes of material handed over by the council to the police were not made available to the panel.

The council did not allow the inquiry to place a notice in the local press seeking information. “This was considered to be unacceptable to the insurers”, says the final report.

The Jillings Report stated that allegations involving famous names and paedophile rings were beyond its remit, and something best addressed at a potential later public inquiry. But it did record that it found a child care system in which physical and sexual violence were common, from beatings and bullying, to indecent assault and rape. Children who complained of abuse were not believed, or were punished for making false allegations.

The report stated that the number of children who were abused is not clear, but estimates range up to 200; in the early 1990s, around 150 had sought compensation. At least 12 former residents were found to have died from unnatural causes.

The final report was not published because of concerns over libel, and legal advice and concerns from the council’s insurers, Municipal Mutual Insurance, which warned that the report would encourage court cases and compensation claims. The report also states that Municipal Mutual suggested that the then chair of the council’s social services committee, Malcolm King, be sacked if he spoke out.

Shameful

Mr King finally did break his silence in 2012, when he stated that “Because it was suppressed, the lessons of the Jillings report were not learned. It was the exchange of financial safety for the safety of real people. It was one of the most shameful parts of recent history.”

John Jillings was also forthright in his assessment:

“What we found was horrific and on a significant scale. If the events in children’s homes in North Wales were to be translated into a film, Oliver Twist would seem relatively benign. The scale of what happened, and how it was allowed, are a disgrace, and stain on the history of child care in this country.”

Despite claims that all copies of the Jillings Report had been destroyed, in November 2012 Flintshire County Council uncovered a copy in their archive. The six north Wales councils took legal advice about whether it could be made available under Freedom of Information legislation.

A redacted version of the report was finally published in July 2013, after a request by the BBC under the Freedom of Information Act. It said that: “Our investigations have led us to conclude that the abuse of children and young people in Clwyd residential units has been extensive, and has taken place over a substantial number of years….

“It is clear that, in a significant number of cases, the lives of young people who have been through the care system in Clwyd have been severely disrupted and disturbed.” It severely criticised North Wales Police, and stated that “the most striking fact to emerge is that five men who shared in common their employment as residential care workers at Bryn Estyn were convicted of serious offences involving at least 24 young people.”

Anti-paedophile investigation

On 17 December 2012 it was reported that Operation Pallial had received information from 105 possible victims of abuse in North Wales care homes, across 22 police force areas across the UK and Ireland.

Senior investigating officer Detective Superintendent Ian Mulcahey of Merseyside Police said that “Operation Pallial is investigating new allegations of historic child abuse, some from victims previously known about and some from victims who have come forward for the first time. All victims of abuse have a right to expect all allegations of abuse, no matter how much time has passed, to be investigated professionally and appropriately. We will do so. Equally importantly, if offenders are still alive they must be identified, investigated and brought to justice, with those who still have access to children being prioritised.”

The report of Phase One of Operation Pallial was published on 29 April 2013. It set out a total of 140 allegations of abuse, involving girls and boys between the ages of 7 and 19, at 18 children’s homes in north Wales between 1963 and 1992. During the inquiry, 76 new complainants came forward, and the police reported allegations against 84 individuals, of whom 16 had been named by more than one complainant. Some of those named were deceased. The Chief Constable of North Wales, Mark Polin, said: “Offenders quite rightly should have to look over their shoulders for the rest of their lives.”

A 71-year-old man, John Allen, appeared in court at Mold on 1 August 2013, charged with 32 serious sexual offences relating to allegations of historical child abuse, and was remanded in custody. On 15 August the police announced that a fifth man, aged 62, had been arrested in connection with Operation Pallial, on suspicion of buggery and indecent assault on two boys in the 1980s. A 52-year old man from Mold was arrested in the St. Helens area on 10 October, on suspicion of child cruelty and indecent assault against four boys and one girl between 1981 and 1988.

North Wales/Westminster link

Significantly, however, the arrests and prosecutions so far involve only on former care home workers. Nothing has been said or done about the evidence of links between the North Wales care homes and the Dolphin Square allegations detailed so long ago by Scallyway magazine.

In particular, John Allen, also known as ‘Sister Latex’ by clients and victims alike, was outed way back then as supplying children to the VIP Westminster paedophile ring.

If Cameron’s new inquiry fails to find these links then we’ll know it’s another cover-up. If it does unveil them, then the scandal is going to be so messy that it will become very clear why his new Cabinet reshuffle has gone out of its way to replace middle aged men with so many unknown, young and inexperienced women.

Certainly, there is so much out there on the Internet that the cover-up is becoming more threadbare every day. Look, for a final example, at this report on Justice Denied:

“The  letter written below is penned  by Simon Regan  Editor of Scallyway Magazine   who’s  half  Brother  Angus  James Wilson,  co-founder of Scallywag,   died  in Cyprus in 1994 whilst the magazine  was investigating  the elite paedophile ring operating in North Wales children’s homes and beyond.”

“In the early nineties, in the now defunct Scallywag magazine, which I founded, we interviewed in some depth twelve former inmates at Bryn Estyn who had all been involved in the Wrexham paedophile ring, which the tribunal acknowledges existed. Most of these interviews were extremely harrowing and disturbing, but were gently and sensitively conducted over pub lunches where the victim could relax. We subsequently persuaded ten of them to make sworn affidavits which we proposed to use as back up to half a dozen paedophile stories we later published.

“Two of these young men, who had been 14-years-old at the time, swore they had been not only introduced to the paedophile ring operating in the Crest Hotel in Wrexham but had later been escorted on three or four occasions to an address in Pimlico where they were further abused.

“We took them separately to Pimlico and asked them to point out the building where this had taken place. They were both positive in their identification. It turned out to be the private flat of a well known, and since highly discredited lobbyist who later went into obscurity in some disgrace because of his involvement with Mohammed al-Fayed and the ‘cash for questions’ scandal. At the time we ran a story entitled ‘Boys for Questions’ and named several prominent members of the then Thatcher government. These allegations went to the very top of the Tory party, yet there was a curious and almost ominous lack of writs.

“The lobbyist was a notorious ‘queen’ who specialised in gay parties with a ‘political mix’ in the Pimlico area – most convenient to the Commons – and which included selected flats in Dolphin Square. The two young men were able to give us very graphic descriptions of just what went on, including acts of buggery, and alleged that they were only two of many from children’s homes other than North Wales.
“There was, to my certain knowledge, at least one resignation from the Conservative office in Smith Square once we had published our evidence and named names.

“Subsequently, over a rent dispute which is still a matter of litigation, Dr. Julian Lewis, now Conservative MP for New Forest (East) but then deputy head of research at Conservative Central Office in Smith Square, managed to purchase the contents of our offices, which included all our files. It had been alleged that we owed rent, which we disputed, but under a court order the landlords were able to change the locks and seize our assets which included all our files, including those we had made on paedophiles. It was apparently quite legal, but it was most certainly a dirty trick.”

All in it together

This article gives only a brief outline of what may be found quite easily in just a couple of hours trawling the Internet. Of course, not everything out there is necessarily true. The leftist Indymedia site, for example, rubbishes the claim by Ben Fellowes that Ken Clarke  (another victim of Cameron’s ‘night of the long knives’) molested him during the filming of an edition of the Cook Report.

Derek Laud is another camp Tory character about whom rumours swirl, but there are plenty of others. Some, in all probability, are innocent, but all have at the very least turned blind eyes and deaf ears to the Westminster Village gossip about what the guilty ones have been up to.

The same, of course, is true of Labour and LibDems. They really have “all been in it (and at it) together”. If just a half of it comes out, the impact of the Expenses Scandal on public trust in the political elite will be small beer compared to what is now on the cards.

A whistleblower who kicked off UK police pedophile probe Operation Fernbridge believes as many as 40 British MPs and peers were involved in or turned a blind eye to child abuse.

Peter Mckelvie, a retired child protection team manager, who has spent more than 20 years compiling evidence of alleged child abuse by people in authority, believes ten current and former politicians are on the list and that there is enough evidence to arrest at least one senior politician, reports the Daily Telegraph.

MPs and peers from all three main political parties are on the list including Cyril Smith and Sir Peter Morrison, who are now dead.

McKelvie was behind bringing Peter Righton, a notorious pedophile, to justice when he worked for Hereford and Worcester child protection team and believes that up to 20 MPs and Lords should be investigated.

“I believe there are sufficient grounds to carry out a formal investigation into allegations of up to 20 MPs and Lords over the last three decades, some still alive and some dead. The list is there,” he said.

And in a letter to his local MP Tony Baldry last month, McKelvie suggested that a further 20 may be implicated in covering up child abuse.

Although he does not suggest that any of the public servants either MPs or Lords colluded with each other.

It was Tom Watson MP who first raised the issue of child abuse by MPs and peers at Prime Minister’s Questions in October 2012 as a result of information that McKelvie had passed to him.

Watson spoke of “clear intelligence suggesting a powerful pedophile network linked to parliament and number 10.”

It was after Watson’s intervention that the Metropolitan Police began Operation Fernbridge, an ongoing investigation about alleged child abuse at the Elms Guest House in Barns, South London.

It is understood that a Tory MP abused a child under the age of 10 at the guesthouse in the 1980s, but the alleged victim has so far refused to give a sworn witness statement to police.

Earlier this week it emerged that a separate file on an alleged Westminster pedophile network, which had been put together by the now deceased MP Geofrey Dickens, mysteriously gone missing after he handed it to the then Home Secretary Lord Brittan in 1983.

Labor MP Simon Danczuk, along with six other MPs, has written to the Home Secretary Theresa May demanding a public inquiry into the missing dossier and the people who had been named in it.

Mrs May said she has not ruled out an inquiry after the police finish their investigations and Prime Minister Cameron also tried to give reassurance that the issue would not be swept under the carpet.

“I’ve asked the permanent secretary at the Home Office to do everything he can to find answers to all of these questions and to make sure we can reassure people about these events. Its right these investigations are made. We mustn’t do anything, of course, that could prejudice or prevent proper action by the police,”he said.

Separately it was reported Friday by the Telegraph that a senior Tory who is being investigated as part of Operation Fernbridge, was stopped by customs officials with child pornography in the 1980s but was never arrested.

A Home Office whistle blower has confirmed what people have been saying for a long time.

That politicians are chosen and promoted precisely because they are perverts, because they can then be easily blackmailed by those who really control the country.

Now that homosexuality has been legalized, exposure for being a sodomite does not have enough stigma to be used as a hold over people, so the Jewish bankers are picking pedophiles instead to put in power.

Express:

British security services infiltrated and funded the notorious Paedophile Information Exchange in a covert operation to identify and possibly blackmail establishment figures, a Home Office whistleblower alleges.

The former civil servant has told detectives investigating the activities of paedophiles in national politics that the Metropolitan Police’s Special Branch was orchestrating the child-sex lobbying group in the late 1970s and early 1980s.

The whistleblower, who has spoken exclusively to the Sunday Express, says he was also warned off asking why such a notorious group was being handed government money.

It emerged late last year that PIE was twice gave amounts of £35,000 in Home Office funding between 1977 and 1980, the £70,000 total equivalent to over £400,000 in today’s money.

Those details surfaced only after the whistleblower highlighted his concerns to campaigning Labour MP Tom Watson and his revelations have triggered an ongoing Home Office inquiry into why the cash was given to PIE which was abolished in 1985 after a number of prosecutions.

Until now, speculation about the grant has centred on Clifford Hindley, the late Home Office manager who approved the payments. However, the whistleblower told the Sunday Express he thought higher and more sinister powers were at play.

He has given a formal statement to that effect to detectives from Operation Fernbridge, which is looking into allegations of historic sex abuse at the Elm Guest House in south-west London.

PIE, now considered one of the most notorious groups of the era, had gained respectability in political circles. Its members are said to have included establishment figures, and disgraced Liberal MP Cyril Smith was a friend of founder member Peter Righton.

In 1981, Tory MP Geoffrey Dickens used Parliamentary privilege to name Sir Peter Hayman, the deputy director of MI6, as a member of PIE and an active paedophile. In 1983 Mr Dickens gave the Home Office a dossier of what he claimed was evidence of a paedophile network of “big, big names, people in positions of power, influence and responsibility”. The Home Office says the dossier no longer exists.

Whistleblower Mr X, whose identity we have agreed to protect, became a very senior figure in local government before retiring a few years ago. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, he was a full-time consultant in the Home Office’s Voluntary Services Unit run by Clifford Hindley.

In 1979 Mr X was asked to examine a funding renewal application for PIE, but he became concerned because the organisation’s goal of seeking to abolish the age of consent “conflicted” with the child protection policies of the Department of Health and Social Security and asked for a meeting with Mr Hindley, his immediate boss.

Labour has suspended Cranford ward candidate Gurpal Virdi from representing the party pending the outcome of a court case next month.

The former Met police officer from Hounslow is accused of indecently assaulting a boy nearly three decades ago and has been summoned to appear before Westminster Magistrates Court on May 30.

Despite the fact he will no longer be supported by the Labour party, Mr Virdi, 55, of Firs Drive, Cranford, said he will still stand in the upcoming local elections.

The allegation came to light after the close of nominations for candidates standing in next month’s Hounslow council elections.

A spokesperson from the London region Labour party, said: “The action has been taken following disclosure that Mr Virdi has been summoned to appear in court on a matter on which we understand he believes he will be cleared of any wrong-doing.

“However, given the circumstances, the Labour Party can no longer support Mr Virdi as a Labour candidate for Cranford ward in next month’s elections.”

According to information from Scotland Yard released last Friday (April 25), Mr Virdi will be answering the following charge that:

“Between September 30 1986 and December 31 1986 within the jurisdiction of the Central Criminal Court, Mr Gurpal Virdi, being a public officer, namely a Metropolitan Police Officer, and acting as such, without reasonable excuses or justification, willfully misconducted himself to such a degree as to amount to an abuse of the public’s trust in that office.”

It goes on to claim the offence relates to the indecent assault of a boy under the age of 16 years (contrary to Section 15 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956).

The summons follows an investigation by the Directorate of Professional Standards into an allegation of an historic indecent assault of a male prisoner.

According to electoral law Mr Virdi will remain on the ballot paper for Cranford ward.

Read More

One of David Cameron’s closest aides has resigned after being arrested on child pornography allegations.

Patrick Rock has been closely involved in drawing up Government policy on internet porn filters.

He quit after the Prime Minister learned he was at the centre of a police probe over images of child abuse.

Detectives from the National Crime Agency searched No 10 and examined IT systems and offices used by Mr Rock, deputy director of the Downing Street policy unit.

Mr Rock was a protege of Margaret Thatcher and has held a series of senior posts in the Conservative Party. He has been close to Mr Cameron for many years.

Described as the Prime Minister’s ‘policy fixer’, the unmarried 62-year-old had been tipped as a leading contender for a Conservative peerage only weeks ago.

His arrest and resignation from Downing Street, where he has worked since 2011, will send shockwaves through the party’s high command. The Prime Minister is said to be ‘extremely shocked’.

A friend said: ‘He has known Patrick for a long time and never expected anything like this.’

Mr Rock was arrested last month after officials at No 10 were made aware of a ‘potential offence relating to child abuse imagery’, Mr Cameron’s spokesman told the Daily Mail.

One well-placed source said Mr Rock had also been the subject of a sexual harassment complaint from a civil servant working in Downing Street, which is understood to have been passed to Mr Cameron’s chief of staff Ed Llewellyn.

‘There were accusations against him that didn’t turn into a formal process. That has upset some people at No 10,’ the source said.

Mr Cameron’s relationship with Mr Rock goes back to the Home Office, where they both worked under Michael Howard in the 1990s.

Mr Rock, who has repeatedly tried to become an MP, is known in Westminster for coining the phrase ‘Cows moo, dogs bark, Labour puts up taxes’ used by the Tories in the 1970s.

The Prime Minister brought him back into Downing Street in 2011, a move welcomed by critics as heralding the return of a ‘grown up’ to the centre of government.

In the No 10 policy unit, he has taken a particular responsibility for home affairs issues and has also been involved in drawing up the Government’s measures against internet pornography and child abuse imagery.

Read More

The head of the Home Office has ordered an investigation into shocking allegations that the Government gave tens of thousands of pounds to a notorious paedophile group.

Civil servants are trawling through decades’ worth of files to look for any evidence that the Home Office once funded the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE), which openly campaigned to legalise child sex.

The extraordinary move has been triggered by Permanent Secretary Mark Sedwill following claims by an ‘insider’ that the Voluntary Services Unit (VSU), which gave annual grants totalling thousands of pounds to charities, had provided financial assistance to the network of abusers.

Labour MP Tom Watson says a retired Home Office employee told him he had raised concerns in the 1970s about the funding, but was warned to drop the matter.

Mr Watson told The Mail on Sunday last night: ‘We are lifting the lid on a murky period in political history. It feels as if we are getting closer to getting the answers that many people have been looking for for a long time.

‘People will be astounded if we discover that a Government of any political hue was funding the PIE.’

A spokesman for the Home Office confirmed: ‘We are aware of the allegations and the Permanent Secretary has commissioned a thorough, independent investigation into what funding the VSU previously provided.’

It is hoped the inquiry will finally uncover the truth about the links between paedophiles and the State following almost 40 years of claims of an establishment cover-up.

PIE was formed in the early 1970s and openly called for the age of consent to be lowered to four, despite public outrage. In 1976 morality campaigner Mary Whitehouse accused a gay charity that did receive Government grants, the Albany Trust, of helping fund PIE, but this was denied at the time.

Read More