All Britons know that schools are designed to prepare their children for the outside world. But what happens when the “outside world” is no longer a traditional European nation, but a traditional Islamic caliphate?

Simple: you alter the curriculum to accommodate the country’s change of direction!

First, schoolchildren need to visit as many mosques as possible. This provides a good foundational understanding of who is conquering them and why it needs to be done.

Next, schoolgirls need to start wearing hijabs to prepare for their roles as Islamic wives, while schoolboys need to be banned from engaging in expressions of masculinity that could, if allowed to develop, threaten Moslem rule.

Last, schoolchildren need to adopt a diet rich in tortured animals and other foods that promote a spiritual connection to Pakistan.

It’s just about adapting to the times, really.

Metro:

A school has enraged parents by banning all packed lunches and choosing instead to only serve Halal meat, gluten-free food and salads.

The food policy at Aureus School, in Didcot, Oxfordshire, says all pupils and staff must eat together in the canteen, with emphasis put on healthy and social easting.

>easting

Now that’s what I call a pertinent typo!

The school insists that only water may be drunk on site because ‘hydrated brains learn better’.

Yup, gotta get those brains nice and wet.

Like sponges.

To absorb the finest Jewish wisdom about multiculturalism, feminism and The Six Million.

Everyone at the school can choose from eating a hot Halal meat meal, a hot gluten-free vegetarian meal, a jacket potato, a salad, a pasta pot or a baguette.

Remember, we’re talking about British schoolchildren here. When offered a choice between meat dishes or gay continental food like baguettes, 90% of them are going to choose the former.

And the administrators know it.

So they’re basically forcing the children to eat animals that were bled to death in haji torture factories. The vegetarian options are presumably included so that if the parents start saying, “OI M8, ARE U MAKING ME KIDS EAT MUSLIM FOOD?” the administrators can respond with: “No, of course not. Look at these delicious nut roasts – they haven’t been blessed by a single cleric!”

Freedom is best :DD And hard choices :DDD

The head teacher is a woman, btw.

Executive head teacher Hannah Wilson said: ‘Food education closes the poverty gap and delicious, nutritious should be a universal entitlement.

‘With all of the headlines about food banks and obesity, we are preparing our students for healthy lifestyles in the future.’

Yes, she talks about “healthy lifestyles” despite being an obese, moonfaced slob.

But it doesn’t matter, because even a lobotomized nigger knows that this isn’t about health. It’s about mentally preparing the children to identify with, and ultimately submit to, the brown conquerors in their midst.

But a father, who wanted to remain anonymous, said the rules were ‘draconian’.

He added: ‘We are thinking of taking her out of the school – it’s getting silly and more like a dictatorship. Their views are quite extreme.

‘It’s about choice. It’s supposed to be an inclusive school but they are only catering for one particular religion.’

He said the school’s insinuation that pupils would not otherwise get a sit-down meal at home, or would only eat unhealthy food, was ‘absolutely insulting’.

The father said he had tried to get the policies changed since September but had been unsuccessful.

Oy vey, it looks like we’ve got a skin-hater on our hands!

What are you gonna do, Nigel? Hold the head teacher at spoonpoint until she changes her mind?

Take your daughter out of Aureus if you want, all British schools are heading in this direction anyway!

This father seriously thinks he can outrun progress!

On the school’s website, a section for frequently-asked questions states reasoning behind the food policies: ‘What we eat is a key influencer on our performance.

…

Reiterating the Halal kitchen policy, the document states this is to ‘celebrate the diversity of our country’s culture’.

Ayyyyyyyy, there it is.

The D-word.

A magical phenomenon that’s so good, no one ever needs to specify why it’s good.

Well okay, one specification is often made.

At this point, all we can do is hope that 2018 Trump transforms into 2016 Trump again, declares the UK to be hostile Islamic territory, bombs it to the ground and rebuilds it from scratch.

I don’t think there’s another way for Britain to get out of this deeply entrenched mess.

An evil White supremacist woman in England has been arrested for posting words on a Facebook page likely to hurt Moslems and the cucks who support them.

As if it was not enough that Moslems had to suffer the devastating consequences of bad publicity following the Paris attacks, this shiksa owner of a beauty salon posted that anyone of the Moslem faith would not be welcome in her boutique.

The Daily Mail reports on this savage and uneducated attack on the real victims of Paris:

A 43-year-old woman has been arrested over a ‘racially abusive’ message posted on a beauty salon’s Facebook page.

The woman has been named locally as April Major, the owner of the beauty business in Bicester, Oxfordshire.

The post, made following the terrorist attacks in Paris, said the salon is ‘no longer taking bookings from anyone from the Islamic faith’, ‘whether you are UK granted with passport or not’.

It added: ‘Sorry but time to put my country first’. 

Thames Valley Police arrested the woman yesterday after receiving a number of complaints about the message.

She has been released on bail until 30 November. 

It was also met with criticism online, with social media users branding the person behind the post ‘racist’, ‘ignorant’ and ‘vile’. 

Laura Burt wrote: ‘Thank God you have been arrested! Foul woman you deserve all you get!’

Yes, the “foul” woman should really be taken away and disembowelled and her genes forever smashed in a special atomiser. Because what she did was unconscionable, stupid, and had more hate in it per sentiment that the entirety of Mein Kampf. To put her people first before a lot of Moslems who want her dead, and her country cucked by the Sharia law that the Jews keep promising them, was a crime on a scale of evil yet to be measured by anything but a new Shoa.

However, it is promising that so many goyim are responding so well to this act of actual Moslem terrorism in which only a terrorist’s passport was lucky enough to survive.

For each goyim is playing its part – firstly by reacting, and then by responding with heartfelt indignation on behalf of an alien people who hate them and are taking over their country.

This is a footnote to to Tim Murray’s current TOO article, “Pulling at Our heartstring: How the Enemy Within Uses Our Empathy Against Us.” In this Guardian article, note the reference to the famous photo and its effect in motivating empathy and (pathological) altruism:

The school hall was packed, with all eyes fixed on the video screen and its images of overladen boats, lines of refugees and shell-shattered buildings in Syria.

This was no normal Sunday service for the congregation of the Cornerstone Baptist church, who gather each week at the local primary school in Thame, south Oxfordshire.

Sunday’s service was dedicated to the plight of refugees, mainly Syrian, but those from Eritrea and elsewhere too.

The pastor, Paddy Harris, had thrown open the doors to all in the local community, to anyone troubled, especially by recent tragic images, including that of three-year-old Aylan Kurdi. To anyone that wanted to find a way to help, he said. Now, more than 100 people – parents with young children, teenagers, the elderly, a whole cross section – had gathered.

“I’m hoping it will show me ways to act, guide towards a practical solution,” said Sally Hobson, 39, a community paediatrician and regular church attendee, whose heart had been telling her to do something but she wasn’t quite sure what.

Amanda Clarke, 46, a barrister and part-time judge, agreed. “I’m hoping it will inspire us towards a more positive way forward,” she said.

Thame is a small town, one of the safest Conservative seats in the country, whose former MPs include Boris Johnson and Michael Heseltine. Here, as in many communities across the UK, the scale of the humanitarian refugee crisis was appreciated. The question to be addressed on Sunday, though, was what they could each do.

So these are predominantly White, Christian people in a Conservative district — more evidence for the pathology and bankruptcy of so much of contemporary Christianity and what passes as conservatism. I notice that Thame is a few miles from Oxford where there was a notorious ring of Asians who raped ~300 young girls, often with “violent depravity.” One would think the good citizens of Thame would have had quite enough of immigrants from that part of the world — that the empathy well would have about run dry. But hope (and empathy) spring eternal.

How could they help? They could pray, he told them. Or pledge money. Anyone with a property for rent could make it available to the local council for refugees. Perhaps they could foster an unaccompanied minor. Or find other ways to help integrate refugees into their community.

The image of tiny Aylan, whose lifeless body cradled by a Turkish police officer went around the world last week, was not shown. But others, stark images of walking lines of the displaced, and the bombed-out places they once called home, conveyed just as powerful a message. …

Mike Hill, a senior officer with the Metropolitan police, believed the horrific picture of little Aylan, and the tragedy that led to the death of him, his mother and his five-year-old brother, had shocked the nation into awareness that the government’s policies “are not looking after the most vulnerable people”.

Then this from a someone from South Africa:

“I think it is a dilemma for Christians,” said Steve Paver, 48, who is originally from South Africa and who described himself as “an economic migrant”.

“The temptation is the quick and easy actions and the short-term needs. And that is important, but it’s going to be a long-term problem,” he said.

“I think the need is so overwhelming and as a Christian I believe even the small things we can do have greater value than we realise.”

One detects a bit of skepticism in the South African. Could it be he is really a racial migrant—a White who got out before he could be victimized because of his race — and before the deluge to come? Or had he already become a victim? Were his economic prospects dashed by favoritism to Black South Africans? One has the feeling the South African understands that the long-term effects of this are not going to be at all easy.

But in the heat of the upwelling of empathy, all that is forgotten. Their descendants won’t so easily forget.

Rotherham part two continues to unravel, and the mainstream media continues to pay less attention to these 400 girls (I’m sure it was many, many more) than they paid to the three Moslem whores who left for Syria to get gang-banged by ISIS serial killers.

Sky News:

Nearly 400 girls may have been sexually exploited in Oxfordshire over a 16-year period, according to a report that has criticised authorities for failing to protect victims.

The Serious Case Review said a paedophile ring was able to rape and abuse six victims for five years because the girls’ complaints were not taken seriously.

They were reported missing 500 times between 2005 and 2010, the review said.

One victim described how she turned up at a police station covered in blood in the early hours, but was ignored.

The review found multiple failings and said authorities could have stopped the abuse in 2005, rather than 2010 when it was finally uncovered.

However, it found no evidence of “wilful professional neglect” by police and social workers.

The report reveals 373 girls have been identified as possible victims of sexual exploitation within the last 16 years in the county.

The horrific accounts of six victims are documented within the review, along with their contact with authorities.

One girl said: “I turned up at the police station at 2/3am, blood all over me, soaked through my trousers to the crotch. They dismissed it as me being naughty, a nuisance.”

Another told the authorities: “The Asian men felt they ran Oxford. That was exciting. People were afraid of them. I felt protected. People respected them.”

Their trial detailed how they “actively targeted” girls from the ages of 11 and 12, the majority of whom had been sent to live in care homes.

The girls were plied with alcohol, introduced to drugs, then sold for sex in guest houses, private houses and hotels, and abused by multiple men, some of whom had travelled to Oxford from “far afield”.

The humiliation and degradation involved knives, meat cleavers and baseball bats. The girls’ ordeals sometimes lasted days.

Like similar cases in Rotherham, Rochdale and Derby, the report states the victims were white girls and the perpetrators mainly men of Asian heritage and Muslim culture, but says “no one was aware of evidence of any holding back due to ethnicity”.

This rape behavior is obviously typical of invading armies, particularly Moslems.

What we should understand – and this isn’t really being discussed much – is that rape is a form of biological conquest of a people you are attempting to drive into submission. Pakis are very low in IQ, so we can assume that most of their behavior is coming from the subconscious mind rather than logical processes of the conscious mind.

Morality as justice for the individual is a concept that only exists in the minds of European man. No one else has this moral drive. I’m going to have to lift a veil here: because morality is not a metaphysical concept, it is a biological function.

The “morality as individual justice” model was beneficial for the development and propagation of Northern individualistic White peoples, and provides no benefit to collectivist groups of brown people, who process moral good and bad in terms of what is beneficial or harmful to the group.

It is time we separated these rape gang scandals from morality. It is not a moral issue, and by allowing it to become one, we are giving in to the narrative of the Jews. It is a collective racial survival strategy. By allowing it to become a moral issue, we enter a lot of debates that have no real meaning, such as “they’re not all like that” or “we subjugated them first,” while never understanding what is happening on the biological scale.

Conquering and dominating enemies with whom you are competing with for resources is a behavior pattern that all animals engage in, whether it be through violence or breeding. It is simply a part of the way the universe operates. Even bacteria engage in this behavior.

By raping girls of the race they are in the process of conquering, the Pakis are demonstrating their dominance over the submissive native group, and they are spreading their genetics, mixing their blood so as to create a generation which is biologically linked to them. I understand that they are also forcing the girls to have abortions, but that is just a conflict between the subconscious and conscious minds – on the conscious level, they are capable of understanding that they are making money from the girls by pimping them out, and that reproduction causes problems.

And for the record, even with the modern option of abortion and the drive to use these girls as prostitutes, the girls still gave birth to at least a hundred babies, according to the government’s own estimate.

We should also look at the responses of the police in terms of the order of nature. What they are doing is submitting to a conquering group which they view as dominant. That is the collective psychology involved with telling the girls to man-up and deal with getting gang-raped. The reason they respond in this way is that the “anti-racist” messages distributed by the government – which serves as a tribal chief in the subconscious mind of modern man – are seen by the subconscious mind as an order to submit to an incursion by these aliens. Also worthy of note is that the continually televised imagery of Moslems as conquerors, slaughtering their enemies, reinforces the subconscious mind’s understanding that it is necessary to submit to a dominant group.

Of course, if we had a solid conception of our own people as an in-group, the words of the government/tribal chief would be disregarded if they went against the collective (this is why collectivist Moslems are constantly overthrowing their own leaders). However, as we have lost our conception of ourselves as a people, and thus lost our identity to overwhelming feelings of alienation, submission to a collectivist group – that is, being absorbed by them – is viewed as a logical course of action in terms of individual self-preservation.

The girl interviewed about Oxfordshire tells of feeling safe with the Pakis, as they ran the town. It is not unnatural that these girls would have had positive feelings toward their abusers, because it is natural for females to align themselves sexually with the dominant group. When the conquistadors took Latin America, they didn’t have to rape women, the women were throwing themselves on them because they were seen as dominating (also, in reality they dominated physically, which makes that situation somewhat different than the situation with Pakis in the UK), and thus it was their genetics which were worthy of being carried.

In other places in Europe, we see girls becoming sexually involved with Moslem men of their own volition at an age when they are capable of making their own decisions. I have a French friend who looks slightly swarthy due to being partially Italian, and he claims that girls approach him and then lose interest when they realize he speaks real French rather than the Moslem version of French.

Due to the processes outlined above, in all Western European nations, invading hordes of Moslems are now seen as the dominant racial group.  And given that a woman is incapable of physically defending herself from a man, it will always been her natural drive to align herself sexually with the dominant group.

All war is a process of one group dominating the other. That is the definition of human warfare. The modern wars in the Middle East represent the Jews dominating their perceived enemies. They have exploited the nature of European man in order to get him to fight these wars for them. Note that they mainly use convoluted moral arguments, which interestingly, they themselves are incapable of processing.

Our modern decline is a result of continuing to apply standards of morality to groups which do not function on the same standards of morality as we do. In order to fix this situation, we must develop and maintain the concept of being an in-group, with the invaders and Jewish parasites as an out-group.

Our denial of ourselves as part of a collective holding a collective identity is nothing less than a form of suicide.  Until such a time as we recognize ourselves as a collective, and decide that we will put the interests of our own group above the interests of competing groups, our women and girls will be stripped from us, right along with everything else.

More than 300 young people in Oxfordshire were groomed, raped and sometimes forced into ‘sex slavery’ by gangs over the last 15 years, a damning report will reveal tomorrow.

In a scandal startlingly similar to the one in Rotherham, police and social services will be criticised for failing to protect vulnerable children from sexual abuse.

One gang of Asian men was responsible for abusing and enslaving 50 girls, mainly from Oxford, but the men were also able to sexually torture girls as young as 11 for eight years after a series of missed opportunities to stop them.

Tomorrow the county’s safeguarding children’s board will publish a review into 15 years of child exploitation, which will be ‘brutal’ in its condemnation of the authorities.

The victims, who were mainly girls under the age of 16 in the care system, were targeted by men from mainly Asian gangs who raped, tortured and trafficked them for sex between 1999 and 2014.

Some were abused for up to eight years despite asking for help from the authorities, who instead refused to believe them or blamed them.

Their abusers fed them drink and drugs before taking them to graveyards, a B&B and flats rented just for the rape and torture of children.

According to the Guardian, one 12-year-old girl was taken to a Reading house for a backstreet abortion during a six-year period where she was passed between groups of men who raped her in what she called ‘torture sex’.

The plight of the victims was laid bare in 2013 when seven members of a sadistic gang were jailed for a total of 95 years for their ‘depraved’ and ‘evil’ abuse of vulnerable girls.

Five gang members were given life sentences and two others were jailed for seven years for ‘crimes of the utmost gravity’.

The paedophile network groomed more than 50 vulnerable girls in Oxford between 2004 and 2012 with gifts, alcohol and drugs before subjecting them to extreme physical and sexual violence.

They used knives, meat cleavers and baseball bats to inflict severe pain on the girls for their twisted pleasure.

But a catalogue of opportunities to stop the abuse was missed as early as May 2005.

Read More

Failed asylum seekers have been given an £80,000 astroturf football pitch paid for by taxpayers as schools are forced to sell their own grounds.

Asylum seekers got their own sports facility at Campsfield House, Kidlington, Oxfordshire, to use while they are waiting to be deported.

While struggling schools are selling their own facilities to pay for improvements, the 216 men at the centre also have a fitness suite, IT centre, library and are given money for winning sports competitions.

Banbury Academy, which is near to the centre, is selling its playing fields to developers for £750,000 so it can afford to build a new sports hall and an all-weather pitch for students.

The school says selling the playing fields is the only way to fund ‘desperately-needed’ improvements.

According to the Sun, North Kidlington primary is holding jumble sales to fund a new play area and children at Bletchingdon primary have to walk 800 yards to a village hall for PE lessons.

UKIP campaigner Paul Nuttal told the Sun he thought the money spent at the detention centre was wrong.

He said: ‘While services are stretched to breaking point, taxpayers are forking out so illegal immigrants can have a good kickabout.’

Last summer, it emerged that 50 playing fields had been sold off over the last three years in what was labelled a ‘threat to our Olympic legacy’.

On average, 17 are closed every year, most in Conservative local authorities.

Read More