Well, frankly.

I don’t even believe this.

Deutsche Welle:

Kosovo police forces entered the northern village of Banjska on Monday, searching for members of the armed group that opened fire on a police patrol on Sunday.

A group of around 30 individuals killed one officer and barricaded themselves in a local Orthodox monastery on Sunday. In the stand-off that lasted several hours, police forces killed three of the gunmen and injured another two.

Several assailants escaped on foot and remain on the loose.

Local forces secure and search the areaLocal police forces arrested two of the attackers, as well as four ethnic Serbs who are suspected of supporting them. All six are being investigated for terrorist acts.

Authorities also searched for infiltrators among worshippers in the monastery.

Two clergymen and a group of pilgrims from Serbia were reportedly staying in the building when the fighting broke out on Sunday. None of them have been injured.

Gunmen believed to be ethnic SerbsIt is not yet clear who the attackers are and who is supporting them, but they are widely believed to be ethnic Serbs from northern Kosovo.

Tensions between predominantly Orthodox Serbs and mostly muslim Albanians in Kosovo have been flaring up over recent months.

According to the Ministry of Interior, police seized arms and explosives that could be used to arm hundreds of people.

Kosovo’s Prime Minister Albin Kurti condemned the incident as a “terrorist attack” and accused Serbia of supporting the “mercenary structure.”

Serbia denies involvementSerbian President Aleksandr Vucic denied any connection to his government, pointing the finger at local Kosovo Serbs instead “who no longer want to stand Kurti’s terror.”

Belgrade has repeatedly accused Kosovo of oppressing Serb communities in the country’s north and has demanded more autonomy for them.

While Vucic condemned the attack, he also slammed the West for its “hypocrisy” over Kosovo. “You can kill us all. Serbia will never recognize the independence of Kosovo, that monster creation that you made by bombing Serbia,” Vucic said.

I went on a rant recently about the Canadians accusing India of an assassination. I can’t remember if the rant was in real life or on the internet.

I said: “It’s possible that the Indians did it, but if the West is trying to attack India, it’s also possible that they did it themselves in order to create a grounds on which to attack India.”

This is something you always have to remember: “false flags are free.”

Anybody can do a false flag for free. The only potential cost is if they get caught, and the West is not worried about being caught, because they totally control the media in their own countries and they don’t care what people in opposing countries think of them. The West will basically do a false flag at any opportunity, because it’s free and there are no consequences, even if they get caught.

It’s of course possible that ethnic Serbs did fire on the cops. I don’t know if we can even say that would be unreasonable, given present circumstances. However, the idea that the government in Belgrade would order that is ridiculous, and the fact that this is implied lends credence to the idea that the whole thing is fake.

This faggot is “concerned”

Stranger things have happened. I just can’t think of any at the moment.

A few months back, Yair Netanyahu, son of Israel’s Prime Minister, published an accurate Alt-Right meme to underline the Jewish problem in Israel. Needless to say, he was viciously attacked.

Yair’s meme. Where’s the lie?

Unexpectedly, it appears as though Yair’s anti-Semitic Alt-Right philosophy has borne fruit and now Jews are adopting full-blown White nationalism en-masse.

I’m just not sure about the logistics of the whole thing though. Will they just hop into ovens on their own, or will a subset of the Jews be responsible for gassing the rest? Either way, this is an exciting development.

Jewish Daily Forward :

Something disturbing has been happening in the Orthodox world. White Nationalist language is infiltrating our public spaces. It’s happening in our synagogues, in our communities, in our schools and, of course, online. And those of us who see it are looking on in increasing horror.

Good going, Yair.

Yair brought forth the urgent message that Israel, like America, is suffering under a Zionist occupational government. It’s definitely time that Israelis learned of the corrosive influence of the Jews.

Now the Jews of America are awakening to this same reality as well.

There was always some racism in our communities, of course; we’d begun to address it around the time Barack Obama was elected president, when calling black people shvartze — a derogatory term for a black person in Yiddish — finally started to become taboo.

But what we’re seeing now is new. It’s different. It’s not just plain racism, or hatred and judgment of a group of people because of their skin pigment. Rather, what I and others have been noticing in our communities is the emergence of a philosophy, one that the Trump era is increasingly bringing into stark relief.

It’s the philosophy of white nationalism that justifies racism, and it’s spreading like a virus among many Orthodox Jews.

After reading this whole article, my chin was worn down to the bone. In a good way, though.

A few weeks ago, President Trump reportedly called Haiti and other countries in Africa “shithole” countries. The white nationalists crowed. “I must come to the defense of #Haiti!” tweeted Richard Spencer, a leader of the nativist “alt-right.” “It’s a potentially beautiful and productive country. The problem is that it’s filled with shithole people. If the French dominated, they could make it great again.” David Duke of the Ku Klux Klan was also thrilled. “Trump spoke Blunt, hard truth that makes PERFECT TRUTH!” he tweeted.

But they were far from alone. When I posted my dismay about Trump’s “shithole” comment on my Facebook page, I was amazed at how similar many of the pro-Trump Orthodox Jews I knew sounded in comparison with Spencer, Duke and Trump himself.

As one argued, “Option A: El Salvador isn’t a ‘shithole,’ so they don’t need 17 years of Temporary Protected Status, and migrants from there should be sent home immediately. Option B: El Salvador is, in fact, a ‘shithole.’”

Another Orthodox friend, who had left South Africa for Israel, remarked, “I’m so glad I emigrated from a shithole.”

And another frum Jew wrote, “So, how many snowflakes would like to move to Haiti?”

25 Jews in Haiti, huh? I guess their cosmopolitanism only goes so far.

Since a majority of Orthodox Jews voted for Trump, they are the only group in the United States reporting growing approval ratings of Trump — up to 71%, according to AJC. So approving are they that immediately following the neo-Nazi march in Charlottesville, Virginia, and Trump’s subsequent defense of white supremacists with the claim that some neo-Nazis are “fine people”, there was the same deafening silence from Orthodox leadership, at least at first, the same defenses, and the same parroting of white nationalist talking points.

Of course. These new “Alt-Right” Jews are fully on board with our anti-Jew agenda, so there’s no reason they’d be offended.

Case in point.

But what’s this liberal Jew’s explanation for this sudden White nationalist shift?

How this is even possible? How could Jews, any Jews, no matter their affiliation, possibly embrace white nationalist ideology?

Look to their influencers for the answer. It’s not Spencer or Duke who Orthodox Jews are parroting. Right wing Jewish commentators, some Orthodox, have an enormous impact on the right wing Orthodox community. These establishment figures aren’t in any way as marginal as Duke and Spencer, and yet, their response to Trump’s “shithole” comment was almost identical. Think of Dennis Prager who said, “Those who truly care about Africans, many of whom are terrific people, need to honestly describe the moral state of many or most African countries.” Or think of Ben Shapiro who wrote, “The argument that Trump is wrong to call some countries s***holes comes down to nicety, not truth.” Joel Pollack, senior-editor-at-large for Breitbart, warned his followers not to ask U.S. military personnel serving in Africa to describe some of those countries: “You may be disappointed.”

Oh, the sweet irony.

The Jews infiltrated the right in order to redirect the goyim away from dangerous anti-Semitic ideas. But as a result, guys like Shapiro and Prager, who have very little pull in the American Alt-Right, actually ended up with a large Jewish audience who are getting turned into Nazis.

This solves a mystery that’s been bugging me for a while: where do Shapiro et al. actually get all their views? Now it all makes sense. Their public, unwitting to them, is actually composed mainly of other Jews.

But in all seriousness, it’s not surprising that orthodox Jews, who tend to keep to themselves, would revert back to a rabidly xenophobic attitude without worrying about White people.

Jews don’t destroy our societies as part of an elaborate conspiracy of which they’re all part. Their behavior is purely instinctual, and triggered by environmental cues. In the absence of the correct stimulus (White people), especially over several generations, they’ll revert back to the next programmed behavior pattern.

Their whole psychology goes something like this:

1. Destroy whitey using the shvartzes. If no Whitey around, then…
2. Destroy/enslave the shvartzes. If no shvartzes around, then…
3. Jew-over other Jews.

This is why, in the absence of non-Jews, Israel quickly turned into a haven for fraud, tax evasion and anti-social behavior. Their solidarity goes out the window unless there’s an outside group compelling them to unite.

This is exactly the opposite of the White man’s behavior pattern, where diversity reduces cooperation, networking and solidarity, while homogeneous societies bring us together.

In Current Year America, there’s no shortage of things that have been ruined by modern conditions. Many things we enjoyed as children are not available to the kids of today. For instance, diversity has turned McDonald’s, Chuck E Cheese’s, roller rinks and even playgrounds into war zones.

The movie theater has similarly been ruined by the brown hordes, whose inability to keep quiet has made the movie-going experience unbearable.

Don’t go to a movie theater unless you’re ready for some unsolicited colored commentary on whatever you’re seeing.

However, our Negro friends are off the hook this time. For once, Tyrone really dindu nuffin.

Instead we have Shlomo, who apparently just can’t help himself when goes to see a kids movie.

NJ 101.5:

At what should have been a fun time at the movies last Friday, witnesses say a man could be seen committing a lewd act during a screening of “The Emoji Movie.”

Police say a woman who was there with her children observed the man with his hand down his unbuttoned and unzipped pants during a Friday afternoon showing at the Xscape theater on Route 9. The man, witnesses told police, was sitting in the last row.

Witnesses described the man as being a “heavy set white male” in his 20s or 30s. He was wearing a white dress shirt and black pants. Howell police said the man was also wearing a yarmulke and had either a goatee or a beard.

According to the Times of Israel, the suspect was some kind of super-Jew.

Times of Israel:

A grainy photo released by police appear to show the man with “peyot,” or sidelocks, which many ultra-Orthodox Jewish men wear.

Gross!

Fortunately, the kosher creep was arrested.

News 12:

Howell police say that Abraham Parnes, 43, turned himself in to police Wednesday evening after an anonymous tip led police to his identification.

That woman reported Parnes to the theater’s manager, who asked Parnes to leave.

Police say that Parnes is a resident of Lakewood and Brooklyn. He was charged with lewdness and released on a summons.

Something interesting to note is the comments in response to the story, some of which appear to have been removed. One heeb whined about anti-Semitism and how the police in the Howell area target Jews (LOL). However, people familiar with the area weren’t having it.

Gentile names have been redacted to protect the innocent.

A Jew emerges to defend one of his own.

Nice try, David. The goyim know.

As I pointed out in my article on “Jewish lightning,” East Coast Hasids have a habit of infesting and taking over entire towns, much to the chagrin of the locals. Lakewood is one of those towns.

Even the blacks got in on the action, calling out the heebs for their penchant for welfare fraud.

You know it’s bad if a black is calling you out on welfare abuse.

What would possess someone to do something so disgusting and bizarre around children? Is it the inherent perversity of the Jew? This case hearkens back to another Jew jerking it in a movie theater, Paul Reubens (aka “Pee-Wee Herman”), star of children’s show Pee-Wee’s Playhouse.

Reubens (born Rubenfeld) was also arrested in 2002 for possessing “dozens of photographs that the city attorney’s office characterized as a collection of child pornography.” Still has a career, somehow.

Could it have something to do with the cultural implications of the most holy book in Judaism, the Talmud, teaching that pedophilia is okay? I’d assume so. This fat creep appears to be Orthodox so I’m sure he takes those “religious traditions” very seriously. Maybe in his mind this was tikkun olam and he was “healing the world” by publicly whacking it.

Jews are so sick, even the Lugenpresse can’t keep a lid on it.

Parents shouldn’t be taking their kids to see this vapid Jew-produced garbage anyway. Do you really want your kids watching some idiotic movie that implies obsessing over your phone is normal behavior? These lazy moms think just because it’s animated that it’s good for kids. It’s not.

This steaming pile of dogshit stars the hideous, unfunny kikemedian TJ Miller; someone so visually repugnant and bad at his craft that it’s obvious his career comes from ethnic nepotism.

Imagine a less masculine Debbie Wasserman-Schultz.

Miller of course thought one of his co-ethnics masturbating around children was hilarious.

It's that good. It is. https://t.co/QhKKFGtyNv

— t.j. miller (@nottjmiller) August 3, 2017

Miller has also admitted The Emoji Movie has a political agenda.

Daily Wire:

The Emoji Movie is part of a broader movement in Hollywood to proselytize leftism, said Miller. HuffPost’s Claire Fallon described Hollywood’s political agitation as a means to “resist President Trump.”

The Emoji Movie will push feminist narratives framing females as a neo-proletariat under the thumb of men, said Miller.

America’s primary political fault line is “progressives” versus “regressives”, according to Miller. He described the former group as persons fearing the Trump administration.

Miller views the entertainment and news media industries as history-altering apparatuses:

“[Our political opponents] have also turned their artillery on media, and Hollywood specifically. They understand that we are the weapon that can possibly change the course of history.”

The rejection of “progressive” politics may destroy humanity, warns Miller, urging HuffPost and other news media outlets to stridently push leftism.

Now we know what the rabbi was getting off to.

These are the creeps making movies for your kids, folks. This isn’t just some innocent entertainment. They’re trying to brainwash them into surrendering their birthright.

This is a reminder to quit funding your enemies, to keep their Talmudic tentacles away from the impressionable minds of your children and to stay away from where these creeps congregate.

Don’t be a lazy parent. Spend some quality time with your kids so YOU can instill YOUR values in them. It’s easier said than done I know, but they will thank you for it later.

What do you call a hyper-ethnocentric group that uses its money and power to aggressively promote interracial relationships for your people, then sends witch-hunters after you if you disagree?

Calling it ‘hypocrisy’ is technically accurate, but it doesn’t capture the actual intensity of their behavior, nor their aloof reaction in the face of such a charge. The English language is fairly limited, the only word we can use is JEW!

Jewish ethnosadism is encoded in their DNA and their “holy” books. Richard Cohen’s Southern Poverty Law Center lists Black Israelites and Christian Identity believers as “hate-groups” even though the only thing they do is follow the Old Testament and apply it to themselves. By that standard, all Jewish sects are hate groups, but the SPLC gets the last say on what constitutes “hate”! 

Now a Rabbi has been purged from the Rabbinical Assembly. His crime? Officiating an interracial marriage.

Forward:

In her article “A Wedding Invitation Like No Other,” Jane Eisner describes “intermarriage” as the “oozing story” among Conservative Jews, a story “found just below the surface.”

I am one of the rabbis she describes as “not so quietly defying the restriction against officiating” at a marriage ceremony involving a Jewish person and a non-Jew. And I would like to assert that this is not a story “oozing below the surface.” It is one of the most consequential issues about the future of Conservative Judaism, and liberal Judaism in America, and everyone knows it. The Rabbinical Assembly (RA) is terrified by it. At its most recent convention, attendees were sworn to secrecy, adjured not to reveal what was said at a closed-door session on the topic. And now a “Blue Ribbon” commission has been empaneled, one whose members were chosen in secrecy.

…

To begin, we need to find a substitute for the term “intermarriage.” It is offensive to many couples. It resonates with the intimation of miscegenation. Their union is not an aberration. It is simply a marriage. The couple who is marrying often does not have a clear sense of what their future, or future home will be. And even if they do, there are no guarantees that life will play out as they plan it. The future is a moving target at best.

What they want from an officiant is affirmation, as they publicly initiate their journey as a married couple, that their love is valid and that their commitment to each other is firm and respected by the community. The fact that they want a rabbi to be that officiant, or one of their officiants, indicates that they envisage Judaism and Jewish identity to be a part of their family’s identity. How much more could we expect of any couple, even if both parties are Jewish? We should feel honored that they want us to be part of their momentous occasion; not put-upon. We should embrace them with love and affirmation, not make demands upon them that they cannot possibly commit to, and act as if we are grudgingly doing them a favor.

In Judaism there is an Orthodox sect (considered the strictest), a Conservative (Centrist) element, and then there are the Reformed (“liberal” Jews) who happily eat pork and do whatever else they want. The Rabbinical Assembly is part of the Conservative movement, so not even radical within Jewry, yet here we see how strict they are about race-mixing. They operate in both the United States and Canada, under full tax exemption for themselves and their congregations, yet are clearly in a legal gray area when it comes to American civil rights laws.

But that doesn’t matter. Jews make the rules and don’t follow them. The New York Times won’t talk about it like they would a Christian church doing the same.

Now of course, there are interracial couples in the American Jewish community, but they are rarely accepted and are the equivalent of “honorary Aryans” in the Third Reich. Jews will officiate certain marriages, like Ivanka Trump with Jared Kushner, because of the political and economic benefits it will reap their community.

With that said, Jewish clergy as a whole finds race-mixing to be unacceptable.

While most people know the Orthodox position, which is to fellate babies and kill all Goyim, liberal Jews oppose intermarriage as well.

Something you won’t ever see promoted by the SPLC or the ADL

The Central Conference of American Rabbis, which oversees practices for “Liberal” Jews, unambiguously discourages Rabbis from blessing mixed marriages. The reason they are considered “open minded” and “progressive” is they don’t blacklist Rabbis who choose to marry a Jew with a Gentile. How enlightened!

Some Jews outside of Israel marry people of European or Asian descent for pragmatic reasons. But when the spouse in question is a Negro, Jews may use it to make political alliances with blacks against whites but it is considered especially wrong. Little do the “black Jew” converts know that their marriages and conversions are a sham. When they try to go to the “holy land,” the Israeli government detains them at the airport and deports them!

Before racial science was established, anti-miscegenation laws in the West were based on Old Testament principles. Jews call this hate, but it’s innocent “defense” of their identity when they do it. Alan Dershowitz – a famously “liberal” Jew – wrote a whole book about it.

This behavior is so complex and psychologically disturbed it isn’t even just sociopathic. That is why you can call a Jew a psychopath, a liar, a hypocrite or a murderer and he just shrugs it off or addresses it as a PR problem. But call him a Jew and then you will witness him writhe in rage and discomfort – the mask comes off!

[Editor’s Note: Eric Striker just made an epic point here: Jews classify both Christian Identity and Black Israelite groups as “hate groups,” because they take the same holy books the Jews use and apply them to themselves. Having been close with a lot of pre-Alt-Right WN guys, I can tell you that the entire belief system of Christian Identity is based on the Old Testament being about whites, and I understand that Black Israelites believe the same thing. Sooooo – by this logic, the third group using the Old Testament – the Jews – would themselves have to be a hate group! Pointing out the double-standards of Jews is so boring, because it is just so obvious. Sometimes I feel like this job that I do is like if I had to go around every day, all day and tell people that the Sun is bright – and then be accused of being pure evil and be hunted down, be defamed across the planet, have local newspapers organizing protests against my father, reporters hunting my mother, have all of my money shut off, etc. etc. etc. – for stating something that is a self-evident fact! That is sometimes what I feel like. -AA]

A correspondent just notified me of a blog post from 2010 on St. John Chrysostom by Roger Pearse, a scholar of Christianity in the ancient world (“Some remarks about John Chrysostom’s homilies against the Jews“). Pearse quotes from a 1935 summary of Chrysostom’s writings whose author, A. L. Williams, notes that Chrysostom was motivated by the fact that many Christians were

frequenting Jewish synagogues,  were attracted to the synagogal Fasts and Feasts, sometimes by the claims to superior sanctity made by the followers of the earlier religion, so that an oath taken in a synagogue was more binding than in a church,  and and sometimes by the offer of charms and amulets in which Jews of the lower class dealt freely.

Williams concluded:

We gather from these Homilies that the Jews were a great social, and even a great religious, power in Antioch.

Exactly. As discussed in Chapter 3 of Separation and Its Discontents, the phenomenon of Judaizing Christians in the ancient world is a marker of Jewish power at the time. For example, the rather limited anti-Jewish actions of the government during the 150 years following the Edict of Toleration of 313, which included many attempts to ban the common practice of Jews enslaving non-Jews, are interpreted by historian Bernard S. Bachrach “as attempts to protect Christians from a vigorous, powerful, and often aggressive Jewish gens.”  Jews as a powerful group were looked up to and emulated by many non-Jews, just as today we see the same phenomenon, not only among many Evangelical Christians, but also Hollywood celebrities who dabble in kabbalah and pretty much the entire non-Jewish political class which we see making pilgrimages to Israel and proudly wearing yarmulkes and displaying menorahs during photo-ops.

This is also relevant to the Jewish IQ debate, where Greg Cochran and Henry Harpending have developed a theory of Ashkenazi uniqueness that implies no particular intellectual distinction for Jews in the ancient world. On the contrary, after the failed rebellions of the 1st and 2nd centuries AD, Jews became very powerful throughout the Roman Empire and certainly by the 4th century when Chrysostom wrote.

Chryostom was not only concerned about non-Jews who were trying to curry the favor of the powerful Jewish community, he also had a very negative view of Jews in general:

[The Synagogue] is not merely a lodging place for robbers and cheats but also for demons. This is true not only of the synagogues but also of the souls of the Jews. (I.IV.2)

Shall I tell you of their plundering, their covetousness, their abandonment of the poor, their thefts, their cheating in trade? (I.VII.1) (St. John Chrysostom,Adversus Judaeos)

Such sentiments were common among the other Church Fathers of the period. Indeed, in the words of one scholar,  “a significant percentage of all Christian writings during the period are essentially adversos Judeaos” (here, p. 103).

Pearse comments that what was really going on was ethnic warfare between religiously defined ingroups and outgroups:

As with so much else in the later Roman Empire, Christianity had become a badge of a community, rather than the means of salvation.  Chrysostom was merely defending the “turf” of the group who had elected him their bishop.

This again is the thesis of Chapter 3 of Separation and Its Discontents. 

Jews were to be conceptualized not as harmless practitioners of exotic, entertaining religious practices, or as magicians, fortune tellers, or healers, but as the very embodiment of evil. The entire thrust of the legislation that emerged during this period was to erect walls of separation between Jews and gentiles, to solidify the gentile group, and to make all gentiles aware of who the “enemy” was. Whereas these walls had been established and maintained previously only by Jews, in this new period of intergroup conflict the gentiles were raising walls between themselves and Jews. And while Jews may have been happy to attract the sympathy of elite gentiles by encouraging Judaizing, Judaizing would be anathema to anti-Jewish leaders, who would insist that the walls between groups be high and that each person belong to only one group. During this period of group conflict, there could be no half-way commitment to either group. As Chrysostom himself said, “ ‘Fortify one another.’ If a catechumen is sick with this disease, let him be kept outside the church doors. If the sick one be a believer and already initiated, let him be driven from the holy table. . . . The wounds that have festered and cannot be cured, those which are feeding on the rest of the body, need cauterization with a point of steel” (Adversus Judaeos II.III.6). The battle between groups must commence. In the long run, the consequences of this Christian group strategy would be a general lowering of the economic and reproductive prospects of the Jewish community.

Christians have to come to grips with the fact that the Catholic Church originated in the ancient world as a group strategy to combat the power of the Jews (short version here). Obviously, it hasn’t always functioned in that manner, particularly since Vatican II. But that’s how it started, and much of this anti-Jewish ideology in which Jews were a dangerous and feared outgroup and that a major function of the Church was to protect Christians from Jews continued into the 20th century as official Church doctrine (see previous link).

The rights of religious minorities, including Christians, are being infringed all over the planet and humanity must take measures to stop such instances, Vladimir Putin said at the meeting with Orthodox Christian leaders in Moscow.

“In many of the World’s regions, especially in the Middle East and in North Africa inter-confessional tensions are mounting and the rights of religious minorities are infringed, including Christians and Orthodox Christians,” the Russian President noted, adding that such conflicts could lead to the most serious consequences.

Putin called for immediate measures to prevent such situations.

He added that Russia has tremendous experience in reaching and maintaining inter-confessional peace and accord, and is ready to share it.

The head of the Russian Orthodox Church Patriarch Kirill said at the same meeting that the attempts to push Christians out of Syria would lead to a “civilization catastrophe”. The patriarch noted that Syria was the birthplace of Christianity and the fact that believers get killed and purged in the course of the military conflict was a tragedy for Orthodox Churches, international culture and for everyday people.

Read More