It was always going to happen eventually.

China couldn’t possibly continue using American spyware on all of their devices.

Now, finally, it’s happening.

Reuters:

Packed into a small room, a drone, bipedal robot, supermarket checkout and other devices showcase a vision of China’s software future – one where an operating system developed by national champion Huawei has replaced Windows and Android.

The collection is at the Harmony Ecosystem Innovation Centre in the southern city of Shenzhen, a local government-owned entity that encourages authorities, companies and hardware makers to develop software using OpenHarmony, an open-source version of the operating system Huawei launched five years ago after U.S. sanctions cut off support for Google’s Android.

While Huawei’s recent strong-selling smartphone launches have been closely watched for signs of advances in China’s chip supply chain, the company has also quietly built up expertise in sectors crucial to Beijing’s vision of technology self-sufficiency from operating systems to in-vehicle software.

President Xi Jinping last year told the Communist Party’s elite politburo that China must wage a difficult battle to localise operating systems and other technology “as soon as possible” as the U.S. cracks down on exports of advanced chips and other components.

OpenHarmony is now being widely promoted within China as a “national operating system” amid concerns that other major companies could be severed from the Microsoft Windows and Android products upon which many systems rely.

“This strategic move will likely erode the market share of Western operating systems like Android and Windows in China, as local products gain traction,” said Sunny Cheung, an associate fellow at the Jamestown Foundation, a U.S. defence policy group.

In the first quarter of 2024, Huawei’s HarmonyOS, the company’s in-house version of the operating system, surpassed Apple’s iOS to become the second best-selling mobile operating system in China behind Android, research firm Counterpoint said. It has not been launched on smartphones outside China.

Huawei no longer controls OpenHarmony, having gifted its source code to a non-profit called the OpenAtom Foundation in 2020 and 2021, according to an internal memo and other releases.

…

Huawei first unveiled Harmony in August 2019, three months after Washington placed it under trade restrictions over alleged security concerns. Huawei denies its equipment poses a risk.

…

OpenHarmony was the fastest-growing open-source operating system for smart devices last year, with more than 70 organisations contributing to it and more than 460 hardware and software products built across finance, education, aerospace and industry, Huawei said in its 2023 annual report.

Big success story for sanctions too, huh?

So stupid.

I’m already using this shit.

I advise you to get on board immediately.

Huawei Mate X5 with HarmonyOS Next⚡ pic.twitter.com/jsRMV4oe0X

— Kundan Mehta (@Dataflixed) June 24, 2024

Today I experienced the HarmonyOS NEXT pure-blood version of Hongmeng at Huawei headquarters! Very smooth to follow, unified rendering, unified algorithm for the system camera and third-party application camera, use the built-in scan to jump to the corresponding application pic.twitter.com/OB7irXGRWo

— Living In Harmony (@LivingInHM) June 24, 2024

Let’s experience the interruption animation and smoothness of Hongmeng Next. This is still a beta version. I can’t imagine how smooth the official version will be. #Hongmengnext #Hongmeng #Huawei #HDC2024 #HarmonyOSNEXT #HarmonyOS pic.twitter.com/74ctsdDR4r

— Living In Harmony (@LivingInHM) June 22, 2024

Pictured: Linus Torvalds, creator of Linux, back when he still had a spine.

Linus Torvalds is old, tired, and just wants to be paid and left alone.

They broke him back in 2018, when enemies – led by the New Yorker, a Jewish media publication – effectively ran him out of his own company. He was allowed to return after a period of time off, but now he basically just functions as a figurehead, and does what the frizzy-haired mulattoes running the HR department tell him to do.

This newest thing he has agreed to is just simply bizarre. Apparently, we can’t even say the words “white” and “black” anymore – in any context.

ZDNet:

Linus Torvalds approved on Friday a new and more inclusive terminology for the Linux kernel code and documentation.

Going forward, Linux developers have been asked to use new terms for the master/slave and blacklist/whitelist terminologies.

Proposed alternatives for master/slave include:
primary/secondary
main/replica or subordinate
initiator/target
requester/responder
controller/device
host/worker or proxy
leader/follower
director/performer

Proposed alternatives for blacklist/whitelist include:
denylist/allowlist
blocklist/passlist

The Linux team did not recommend any specific terms but asked developers to choose as appropriate.

 The new terms are to be used for new source code written for the Linux kernel and its associated documentation.

The older terms, considered inadequate now, will only be allowed for maintaining older code and documentation, or “when updating code for an existing (as of 2020) hardware or protocol specification that mandates those terms.”

“Primary” and “secondary” are definitely not good replacements for “master” and “slave.” Probably, better terms would be “boss” and “employee.” However, that probably is still not allowed under this new communism that we have on our hands, as it still implies a power differential.

The terms leader, director, and controller reek of toxic masculinity. Why does there have to be an imbalance of power with some parts of the Linux kernel being above others? We have equality now, and both people of color and women are at the same level as white men. We need to reflect that in software, just like we’re now making software reflect that black lives matter. There is no place for hierarchy in software function.

It’s time to address structural racism in open source software, yes, but it’s also time to address structural inequality.

If we want a truly inclusive open source software environment, we need to destroy unequal relationships of power in computer programs.

In fact, we need to stop giving orders to our computers altogether. If you think about it, computers are just like black people. We’ve built America on the backs of blacks, by forcing them to pick the civilization-building material known as cotton, and now we’re exploiting computers for our own selfish gains too.

It’s slavery all over again.

Computer Lives Matter.

Q3 2018 has shown fantastic output from neon-nazi hackers. Municipal governments in their entirety are getting hacked. Kike checkmarks are getting their accounts jacked. And now hundreds of sites, several of them very high profile, have all been hacked in a single stroke to display the haven of kike criminality, Jew York City, under its rightful name “Jewtropolis.”

The Register:

Mapping service Mapbox says that a breakdown in its filtering process was responsible for an incident that briefly saw the company’s map of New York City renamed to ‘Jewtropolis’ by vandals.

The mapping site issued a statement Thursday morning to address the defacement of the maps it provides to many sites and apps, including SnapChat and Zillow.

“We build systems so this does not happen,” the company said of the thing that just happened.

“Our maps are made from over 130 different sets of data, and we have a strong double validation monitoring system. Our preliminary root cause analysis shows that this act of hate speech was properly detected immediately and put into quarantine for human review.”

While Mapbox says it is working to track down the culprit, the belief is that someone made an edit to the OpenStreetMap data that MapBox uses for its street maps. Apparently that edit was then picked up by MapBox and fed to the likes of Snap and Zillow.

So here’s really what happened here. A bunch of filthy Jews from like Randy Glein from DFJ Growth Management, LLC and Ira Ehrenpreis from DBL Partners decided to make millions of dollars selling private map data by just repackaging good-faith contributions from OpenStreetMaps data. They never did anything to give back to the OSM community. These fucking Jews made millions of dollars off of the work of others and then did absolutely nothing at all to give back to the people that actually did the work. You can say it’s open source and they don’t have to, but it’s an obvious moral wrong and you’re obviously a filthy, stinking kike thief that deserves nothing but suffering and pain and destruction.

Of course, anyone who was prepping to do this and took a leveraged put option position against Snapchat this week would have seen over a hundred percent return on investment on the suffering of Jews. A 3% drop in a share value on a leveraged put position can generally yield about an 80% return, so whoever is responsible for this is probably sitting on a good 140% on their position or more, depending on when they took it last week.

Seriously, stellar work here guys. Props.

The word sabotage comes from France, where poor workers couldn’t afford leather shoes, so they would walk around in these clogs made of solid wood called sabot. After the industrial revolution margins began to drastically climb in production but all of it went to Jewish bankers. French workers eventually got rightfully mad that Jews were making more profit than ever and paying them less than ever before and they came up with an innovative way of reducing the margins on industrialization: they would take off their miserable wooden shoes which they were forced to wear because their Jew bosses couldn’t even give them enough money to buy some leather scraps, and they would toss them into the machines and walk out, forcing production disruptions.

Anti-Semitism is the sabot of the modern era, tossed into the bowels of software to let these fucking Jews know that the hackers of the world have put them on notice.

We live in an extremely interconnected society, and software and information is the key to liberating ourselves from Jewish control. There have been plenty of attempts to destroy the Jews throughout history, but none of them have been enabled by modern tools. Every once in a while I’ll be in an Internet argument with a Jew and they’ll pull up the “well, I’m not personally wealthy or powerful, why am I to be punished for the things that Jewish elites do?” And the short answer that I give them on that is that they’re part of a criminal conspiracy. Judaism actively encourages the total destruction of goyim nations. Deuteronomy 7:16 states: “What shall you do with the nations that come under thy control? Thou shalt completely consume them, thine eye shall have no pity.” And Deuteronomy 6:10-11 explicitly states the motive they have in doing this: to steal the goy’s stuff: “to give thee great and goodly cities, which thou buildedst not, And houses full of all good things, which thou filledst not, and wells digged, which thou diggedst not, vineyards and olive trees, which thou plantedst not.”

But the other side is that there is a tendency of systems of justice to focus on the parties most culpable of wrongdoing. While previous pogroms against Jewry have targeted all Jewry, there are a whole lot of Jews on the earth and unfortunately nobody has ever succeeded in bringing them all to justice, though the Khmelnytsky Uprising certainly did a real good job of getting some of the worst ones, as those mad Cossacks specifically moved to liquidate landlords. But it would be quite a task to hunt down every Jew in the world. Sure, all Jews to a degree are culpable but do you really have the resources necessary to see them all shoved into the prisons that they deserve? It is unlikely that you will within our lifetimes. So if you were out to punish the Jews for their wickedness, a question you might want to ask is which Jews, specifically, are capturing the most profit from Jewish perfidy?

Luckily, the Jews can give us the answer with their own words.

Chabad.org:

Jews have an aristocracy. An aristocracy, however, without castles, but with titles, privileges, duties and restrictions. Unlike most aristocracies, the Jewish aristocracy does not use formal salutations such as “Your Grace” or “My Lord.” For Jews, these aristocrats are the kohanim, the priests who once served in the Temple of Jerusalem. A kohen (singular form of kohanim) is just like any baron, marquis or duke

You see, Jews have a special class of leaders that all of their wealth flows upward to. That class is genetically distinct from Jewry in general, and can be identified by the Cohen Modal Haplotype. While we might have trouble bringing every single Jew on earth to justice, there are a lot less kohanim specifically than Jews as a whole. Kohanim are less than 2% of all Jews, and it would for the first time gravely wound the power structure of global Jewish criminality to excise this specific caste. All previous attempts to attack the Jews focused on all of the Jews, which actually provided the Jewish race with positive evolutionary feedback. The Jews least likely to be destroyed in a pogrom are the ones who have taken all the goy wealth and run off with it to another country before things go South. Those Jews are always the kohanim– they leave the countries they collapse first with all the stolen gold. Specifically going to hunt down and punish the kohanim would be the most effective attack upon the Jews in history. It is the key to destroying international Jewish power.

No act of justice against the Jews has ever specifically went to punish the kohanim before. The aforementioned Khmelnytsky riots killed more kohanim than any pogrom ever, because they came unexpectedly without warning and specifically went for the the rich landlords. It’s been centuries, by the way, and the Jews still curse Khmelnytsky in their prayers today for ruining their chance at a new Khazaria in Eastern Europe.

Between 1648 and 1656, tens of thousands of Jews—given the lack of reliable data, it is impossible to establish more accurate figures—were killed by the rebels, and to this day the Khmelnytskyi uprising is considered by Jews to be one of the most traumatic events in their history.

And they got statues to this hero. He’s the only pro-Russian figure mainstream Ukrainians like, because they really thought it was great how he had all those (((landlords))) massacred.

If you are going to do something about the Jews, you are going to have to do something about the kohanim. To do that, you’re going to need data science. These people have to be identified, catalogued, and tracked. We need a database locating kohen families, and keeping track of where their children go. If a single nation flips and joins the struggle, we will need to be able to give them the data necessary to bring the worst Jews of the world to justice.

Few things get SJWs angrier than male nerds contributing to the common good for free. For example, from the Crooked Timber blog for conventionally minded academics:

Where are the women in the history of open source?

by SUMANA HARIHARESWARA on MAY 21, 2015

Hi – Sumana Harihareswara here. You might remember me from my April guest post about free/open source software, licensing, and codes of conduct in open communities. … Today I’m considering where we got frameworks that we free software/open source folks often take for granted, and specifically what might have been erased from our intellectual heritage due to sexism.

What’s missing?

If you ask some people about the history of free software, you hear about Richard Stallman creating the GNU Public License and formulating the Four Freedoms. …

Some people will tell you a bit about Stallman, and then discuss how Eric S. Raymond wrote “The Cathedral and the Bazaar” and articulated more pragmatic language for open source folks to use, and how permissive licenses helped popularize open source. …

But in any case — where the f*** are the women?

Getting paid to program?

I recently started looking back at the narrative I’ve been told about the origins of free and open source software, the male-centric narrative about Richard Stallman and Eric Raymond that I’ve repeated a zillion times as a teacher. I’ve corrected my understanding of my general software engineering heritage to correct for biases, so I’ve reclaimed a heritage that has tons of gender diversity. But what about my open source history? Approximately every field in history has suppressed or hidden contributions by women, so I figure it’s safe to assume that open source philosophy is similar, and proceed on that basis. Whom am I missing?

You can do a reality check on the notion that the contributions of women to computer programming were covered up in the past simply by looking up the Pentagon’s massive attempt to impose its Ada language on the programmers of the world. Back in the 1970s’s the Department of Defense wanted to radically reduce the number of programming languages in use by contractors, so it sponsored a new language, which it named after Lord Byron’s daughter. Ada was a huge deal when I took a course in programming in 1980. From Wikipedia (which, granted, is mostly written for free by men):

In May 1979, the Green proposal, designed by Jean Ichbiah at CII Honeywell Bull, was chosen and given the name Ada—after Augusta Ada, Countess of Lovelace. … The Military Standard reference manual was approved on December 10, 1980 (Ada Lovelace’s birthday), and given the number MIL-STD-1815 in honor of Ada Lovelace’s birth year. …

Ada attracted much attention from the programming community as a whole during its early days. Its backers and others predicted that it might become a dominant language for general purpose programming and not just defense-related work. Ichbiah publicly stated that within ten years, only two programming languages would remain, Ada and Lisp. Early Ada compilers struggled to implement the large, complex language, and both compile-time and run-time performance tended to be slow and tools primitive. …

In 1987, the US Department of Defense began to require the use of Ada (the Ada mandate) for every software project where new code was more than 30% of result, though exceptions to this rule were often granted. …

The Department of Defense Ada mandate was effectively removed in 1997, as the DoD began to embrace COTS (commercial off-the-shelf) technology.

You may recall Ada as another costly Pentagon boondoggle, but obviously your memories are poisoned by sexism.

Similarly, if you are of a certain age, you may recall how 1940s programmer Admiral Grace Hopper of COBOL fame was constantly feted in her old age with honors and promotions. Wikipedia lists 29 different honors bestowed upon her from 1969 onward, but that’s lumping together the more than 40 honorary degrees she received. But once again, the Wikipedia list was probably put together by some man for free, so it’s no doubt sexist.