https://t.co/60TWvpLOUi has 31 listed gender options pic.twitter.com/WcN1NtnSfL

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) July 4, 2022

I am still failing to understand the core concept of multiple genders. I get the tranny thing, obviously, but this thing of spamming nonsense categories is just very clearly meant to confuse and dazzle people even further.

Breitbart:

The popular online dating website Match.com lists over two dozen gender options, including “polygender,” “gender questioning,” “pangender,” and “neutrois.”

Members of the radical left continue to push radical gender ideology into the mainstream, including into children’s classrooms. Some states, such as Florida, have taken action to eradicate the woke indoctrination of children. The Parental Rights in Education law went into effect in the Sunshine State on Friday, barring classroom discussions on sexual orientation and gender identity with children in kindergarten through third grade. Despite clamoring from the left, most voters support anti-groomer laws in their states.

Nonetheless, the left continues its efforts to normalize a plethora of genders and sexual orientations, and Match.com serves as a prime example of that work.

“Which best describes you?” the online dating site reads, listing a host of options outside of man and woman. It contains well-known alternate options, such as “agender” — used to describe someone who does not have a gender — “transgender,” “trans woman,” “trans man,” “non-binary,” and “intersex,” but it also includes less commonly known options.

For instance, it includes the choice “neutrois,” which Fort Lewis College defines as a “non-binary gender identity which is considered to be a neutral or null gender” and “has considerable overlap with agender.” “Demiman” and “demiwoman” are both on the list, used to describe someone who partially identifies as either man or woman. “Polygender” — someone who identifies as multiple genders — is on the list, as is “pangender” — described as a “multigender non-binary gender identity which refers to a vast and diverse multiplicity of genders in the same individual that can extend infinitely.”

Other gender options listed include “bigender,” “gender fluid,” “gender non-conforming,” “gender questioning,” “gender variant,” “genderqueer,” “non-binary,” “other,” “two-spirit,” “trans person,” “transgender man,” “transgender person,” “transgender woman,” “trans masculine,” “transsexual,” “transsexual man,” and “transsexual woman.”

I didn’t realize that Justin had put the two spirits at the front of the line.

People across the country are lighting candles to honour Indigenous women, girls, and 2SLGBTQQIA+ people who are missing or have been murdered. We must continue to work together, raise awareness, and advocate to end this ongoing national tragedy. #SistersInSpirit pic.twitter.com/cUUmff1ZOd

— Justin Trudeau (@JustinTrudeau) October 5, 2021

For those who don’t know, “two spirits” (2S) are some kind of Canadian myth about how there were tranny Indians before the white man beat them into heteronormativity.

Trudeau is literally the fakest human being that has ever lived.

Worse than the trannies themselves, frankly.

At this point, what percentage of Western men who accidentally end up on a date with a tranny would be like “meh, you gotta take what you can get”?

You can watch this video. You couldn’t recognize it as a tranny in an airbrushed photo. He has a passible voice even.

I stand by the claim: over the course of the next decade, trannies will be more attractive than women. The ones who take the puberty blockers will go through female puberty, and they will be better at being women because men are better than women at everything.

They are really going to start pushing that it’s someone not gay.

You need to remind your friends: it is definitely GAY.

Your typical post-wall woman in Western society.

“Hitting the wall” is a term that is being increasingly used to describe women who have reached an age where men no longer find them sexually attractive. Many women in Western countries appear to be hitting the proverbial wall quicker than ever before. Evidence of this can found on various online dating and hook-up sites like Tinder, Plenty of Fish and Bumble.

These self-absorbed post-wall women are under the misconception that they can attract the same quality of a man that they were able to attract during their peak fertility years. And even crazier is that they think they can do this while putting in a minimal amount of effort.

A courageous YouTuber named Keith in his late 30s decided to explore and document this strange world of single post-wall women by scanning through the online dating profiles of women between the ages of 32 and 45. The results of his research were highly disturbing and confirmed what we already know about these horrific skanks. Your average man will no doubt find the results abhorrent and disgusting.

In this video he goes through Tinder and Plenty of Fish profiles in his local area of Pittsburgh.

And he did a second video going through the Bumble profiles of post-wall women in the Fort Myers area.

I’m roughly around the same age as this brave YouTuber who, in my view, did a tremendous public service by exposing how disgusting and vapid these post-wall women are. I can safely say that there was not a single woman in either of these videos who I would want anything to do with. These women offer nothing of tangible value. They’re way past their sexual prime and don’t appear to be the least bit interested in performing basic household duties. A good chunk of them also had kids from a previous relationship that you’d have to deal with. They’re highly uninteresting and boring individuals whose lives represent varying cliches of our degenerate society.

Like a parasite, these women are looking to latch on to some stupid simpish man who they can use as their personal piggy bank. It’s really quite pathetic to witness.

This is what happens to disloyal women who waste their peak fertility years having sex with hundreds of different men. Once they hit the wall, they become broken people who any decent and respectable man would want nothing to do with.

The level of entitlement that women feel is only surpassed in its insanity by the level of willingness of Western governments to cater to them.

Imagine this woman believing that any man would have interest in her. A 47-year-old mother of three would be lucky to get a pity-fuck by a black crackhead. But the court agrees it was this website’s job to find her a rich man who works in finance, wants to raise her children, and pay for her to travel the world.

wew.

Listen up, ladies: men with money want young, fresh bitches. That’s why they worked to get the money. So they could get young, fresh bitches.

If you are a used up old fat hag with bastard children, you should join a nunnery, or just do the adult thing and become a jolly grandma baking cookies.

The Guardian:

A divorcee seeking a wealthy boyfriend has won £13,100 in damages from an elite dating agency after it failed to introduce her to the match she hoped would be “possibly the man of my dreams, the father of my child”.

Tereza Burki had sued Seventy Thirty, based in Knightsbridge, central London, for deceit and misrepresentation. On Wednesday the high court ruled it had misled the businesswoman about its “exclusive” membership.

Delivering the ruling, Judge Richard Parkes QC said: “Gertrude Stein quipped that whoever said money can’t buy happiness didn’t know where to shop.

“This case is about a woman looking for romantic happiness who says she was tricked into shopping in the wrong place, paying a large sum to a dating agency which, she says, made promises but failed to produce the goods.”

Burki, 47, a mother of three who lives in Chelsea, approached the dating service in 2013 in pursuit of a new partner. “Her requirements were not modest,” the judge observed.

What she wanted was a “sophisticated gentleman”, ideally employed in the finance industry. It was important that he should lead a “wealthy lifestyle” and be “open to travelling internationally”.

Her most important requirement was a willingness to have more children since she had always wanted four. Burki was encouraged by what she read about Seventy Thirty and eventually signed up, paying £12,600.

The judge said the agency’s then managing director, Lemarc Thomas, claimed there was a substantial number of wealthy male members actively engaged in its matchmaking services who were a sufficient match for Burki’s desires.

This was false and misleading, said the judge, because there were only about 100 active male members altogether. That number could not “by any stretch of the imagination” be described as a substantial number, even without considering how far that number would have to be reduced to allow for compliance with her criteria.

“Had Ms Burki known what the true size of the active membership was, she would not have joined Seventy Thirty,” he said. She was induced to enter her contract with the agency by the false representations given by Thomas, who must have known he was giving her a wholly false impression, he added.

The bitch should have known that there is not a wealthy man who wants to raise the children of a 47-year-old used-up hag, and anyone who told her such a man existed was lying.

I guess they shouldn’t have indicated to her this was possible, but you know – caveat emptor.

Women live in their own realities, where they themselves are the center of the universe, and everything that exists exists only to serve them. That is their actual orientation, the basic wiring of their brains.

Once you understand that, you can understand everything they do.

Please research solipsism.

Put women in charge of the dating game? What could possibly go wrong?

A lesson all men learn sooner or later is that if they want to get laid, they have to take the initiative. Not only that, but they’ll probably have to fully take charge of every step of the process.

You’ll have to approach the girl, direct the flirting process, ask her number, call and set up the date, decide what you’ll do, drag her along, take her back to your place, and so on.

This is because women are passive, and have absolutely no agency of their own. If you wait for women to “make the first move,” (or any move after the first one, for that matter) you’ll remain single your entire life.

This is why the entire online dating process follows the same rules: women set up cute little “profiles” and passively wait for men to message them and convince them to go on a date.

This slut could ask any random guy to bang her, but instead she’s making a stupid Tinder profile, waiting for a guy to do the work.

Considering all this, Tinder’s new move is patently absurd.

Market Watch:

Tinder plans to give women more power in its online-dating app by adding a setting similar to a key feature for younger rival Bumble.

The more “power” you give women in any dating scenario, the less actual hooking up is going to be happening. This is an obvious fact.

Tinder will let female users choose whether they want to initiate all conversations with future matches, as Bumble does, Match Group Inc. MTCH, +5.83% Chief Executive Mandy Ginsberg told MarketWatch in an interview Tuesday. Tinder users of either gender can make the first move now, but a future update—Tinder did not provide a targeted launch date—will let women choose to receive messages only from men they choose.

This is doubly stupid considering that women aren’t even self-aware enough to know that if they have the sole responsibility to initiate the flirting process, they’ll probably never actually do it. So it’s quite likely that many girls will actually select that option even though what they really want is for men to do all the work.

“Wow, what a hunk. I’m too shy to contact him though. Tee hee!”

“Often, women don’t really want the pressure of kicking off the conversation, but if they want it, that’s great,” said Ginsberg, who took over the top role last month at Match Group. “Giving people the choice versus telling people how to engage is the big difference.”

The women-talk-first setting is the cornerstone of Bumble’s dating app, which also has other features meant to give women more control over the online-dating experience. Bumble was launched by Tinder co-founder Whitney Wolfe Herd, who left the company and sued for sexual harassment and discrimination, reportedly receiving a $1 million settlement.

Online dating sites and apps are pretty much already just an ego-boosting system for thots. By default, they just join to get gratification from men “liking” their profile and complimenting them in chat.

But with these changes, the possibility for men to actually get dates and sex will drop from “low” to “damn near impossible.”

After all, women are attracted to higher status, confidence and assertiveness. By preventing men from taking that initiative, the service itself docks all the men’s attractiveness significantly.

The very concept of online dating is somewhat emasculating, as it vaguely implies you’re not brave enough to pick up chicks in real life, or you don’t have enough friends to date from your social circle. So it already requires you to compensate for that initial instinctive impression.

But these new services putting “women in charge” make this even worse, putting men in a submissive position by default. It’s not even worth trying to play that game.

Pro tip: learn to make moves on women in real life, in the day time, in a bold way. That is the only real option at this point, unless you’re a GQ model that all the Tinder sluts want. 

In a case of Virgin Unitarian vs ISIS Chad, a female Jihadist abandoned her like-minded husband fighting for ISIS in Syria to come back to the US and slut it up.

This thot, Tania Georgelas, was a supporter of extremist Islam since 9/11. In 2013 she traveled to Syria with her husband – John Georgelas, a white convert to Islam – with their four children.

When she got there, it wasn’t as fun as in the movies, so she demanded to go home. Her husband helped her get back with the kids to America (why isn’t she in prison?), and when ISIS started losing the war, she began shopping for a new man.

John, who indeed is a demented dirtbag for joining ISIS, is still alive fighting for his warped cause. This cunt is such a piece of shit she makes him look almost sympathetic in comparison.

Daily Mail:

The British-born jihadi bride who was married to the most senior American member of ISIS has spoken out, revealing her new life as a suburban mom in Dallas.

Tania Georgelas, 33, detailed her radicalization, her dream for her children to become terrorists and the ultimate split with her jihadi husband in a new interview with The Atlantic, released Friday.

‘Our dreams were to have land of our own, raise a family and train them be assassins or whatever, soldiers, and then eventually go join the jihad,’ she said of her ex-husband John Georgelas, an American-born convert to Islam who has risen to the upper ranks of ISIS.

From the comfort of her new life on the northern outskirts of Dallas, where she lives with John’ wealthy parents and attends a Unitarian church with her IT programmer boyfriend Craig, Tania described the extraordinary journey that took her from England toSyria, and finally America.

…

Tania said the terror attacks of September 11, 2001 were a turning point for her radicalization.
‘I was 17, I saw the towers being crashed into and I went to school the next day,’ she recalled. ‘I said to my friend, “Oh isn’t it dreadful what happened,” and she looked at me and said “Is it really?”‘

‘At that point I became really jihadi hardcore,’ she said.

A few years later, she was at a protest against the Iraq war when she says Muslim men were handing out slips of paper, with the address of a Muslim matchmaking website written on them.

Through the website, she met John Georgelas, the youngest child and only son of former US military doctor Colonel Timothy Georgelas and his wife Martha.”

…

In August 2013, the family traveled to Syria by bus, setting up home in the abandoned villa of a Syrian general in the town of A’zaz. There were no windows, no running water and only a meager supply of food. Within days, Tania and the children became ill with vomiting bugs and infections.

Astonishingly, given what is known about the way ISIS treats those who turn their back on it, John agreed to his wife’s demands to leave.

With the help of John’s parents, she made her way back to Texas with the children, and sought and obtained a divorce from him. He remains in Syria to this day, where he has become the highest ranking American in ISIS.

Single in a new city, Tania returned to the world of online dating.

‘I went to the dating website Match, I wrote an essay: “I have four kids, my husband abandoned me to go become the next Osama Bin Ladin”. I got 1,300 replies.’
She met her new beau Craig, an IT worker, within 24 hours on the site.

It’s Weimerica, where do I begin?

Do I hate on the white guy who converted to Islam to become an ISIS Jihadist?

Do I hate the slut who agrees and has four kids with him?

Do I hate the 1,300 pussy-pedestaling losers who blow up the egos of women like this on the internet for the .001% chance they will reply?

Do I hate the Jews who invented the gynocentric dynamic of online dating, which has made long lasting relationships impossible thanks to making women believe they have infinite romantic prospects forever?

Do I hate the douchebag Unitarian “Craig” that – despite presumably making good money – is seriously dating a used up Paki terrorist BPD divorcee with four kids?

Single moms, Islamism, disloyalty, online dating, thots, cucks – this story is like compacting everything wrong with the world in one place.

Which is why this woman is a celebrated media sensation.

Female nature is fickle.

The ultimate black pill reality about women is revealed here: when the going gets tough, they get going.

When you’re winning every woman wants a piece of you, but when you get into a rut (inevitable for everyone) modern women will just abandon you and, like a light switch, pretend like you never existed. They don’t feel any guilt about it.

If you are called to war (in any context), your wife will leave you or cheat on you while you’re out there. For whatever reason modern women are not capable of genuine empathy for human beings that aren’t related to them (only their pets). The most woke people on sex differences are ex-military guys. You can’t say men who fight in wars (whether as Jihadists or US soldiers) are “beta males” or “incels” either.

If you are seriously injured in an accident many women over 40 will leave you, and all women under 40 will do the same. Kids or not, they don’t give a shit because #1 comes before you and the kids.

Notice this isn’t true for your grandparents. Something changed.  Grandma is also a lot happier than any woman today 18-45. Perhaps there’s something to not being a nihilistic and narcissistic whore.

The threshold is different for all women but it’s always there and it’s sad. Some women will betray you just because you lose your job or lose a fight at the bar.

Julius Evola once said that great women distinguish themselves through their loyalty. These women don’t exist anymore because we don’t have any system of reward/punishment to mold them.

Women belong to the system now. The only way to get them back to how they used to be is to be the system.

You should’ve stoned her when you had the chance, John!

Send terrorist thot Tania Georgelas to Gitmo! 

This generation of women will inevitably go from infinite choices to dying alone, and don’t have the foresight to care.

When it comes to “dating apps,” Jews control all the major ones. IAC’s (((Barry Diller))) and (((Joey Levin))) control Match.com, Tinder and OkCupid in a monopolistic fashion. For this reason, the services in question are all highly political and virulently anti-male.

Any time you pay them, you are paying Jews to advance hypergamy and feminism. Thanks to social media and dating sites catering towards women, monogamy has become all but impossible.

For that reason, you should exclusively use dating sites to troll and stir the pot: an antidote to the unnatural frame Jews have created here.

City Pages:

One young Twin Cities man is going to have a hard time finding a date for a while.

Especially if he’s using Tinder, which he apparently was not long ago, and where, in early September, he “matched” with a young woman named Alison Kmett.

The man’s Tinder profile described him as 20, a student at North Hennepin Community College, “quick with a joke or to light up your smoke,” and a lover of hockey and lacrosse, according to a since-gone-viral Facebook post of Kmett’s. He currently works as a cook, and is working toward a nursing degree.

“Hey,” the guy wrote to Kmett. Time passed, and her would-be suitor’s attempt at an opening line went without response. So he wrote again.

“Well i kinda hope you get raped bye,” the guy wrote, illustrating his message with a hand-wave emoji.

Eschewing the traditional choices — either responding to this grisly threat, or ignoring it — Alison Kmett went with a third option. She took it public, posting a screenshot of the messages and his Tinder profile, while charitably crossing out the dude’s name.

…

Others took the story directly to the guy’s school, which responded with a statement earlier this week. North Hennepin Community College heard from “many very concerned students, parents, and community members” about the situation, and reiterated its stance against behavior like his.

“Our college takes this matter very seriously, and our public safety department has opened an investigation into the incident. We do not in any way condone, or tolerate this type of rhetoric or behavior, as stated in our sexual harassment policy.”

NHCC did not include whether the incident could affect the man’s status as a nursing student.

If you are good looking and muscular, post shirtless pics with inflammatory troll profiles and you might actually get laid. But beware, bitter cunts and their bugman enablers may try to dox you when you inevitably get frustrated over the sheer amount of bots, scammers, Instagram follower farmers, and attention whores (99% of all women on dating apps, the other 1% being fat broads and single moms) Tinder has made itself a home for.

As for the man in question, he is a catch: good looking, employed and has a plan for the future. In any sane time in history, women would love for him to take their hand in marriage. The same might be true of you reading this, Joe Average.

But in the age of feminism and casual sex, women use attention from him as a crutch propping up their fantasy about that semi-famous hockey player or coke-dealer that banged them out in a nightclub bathroom.

When he reacts with relatively mild frustration at being ghosted (probably not the first time), the bitch suddenly taps into her network of harpies and cuckolds to ruin his life. That’s female pathological narcissism in action.

How much more of this will men tolerate?

WHITE SHARIA NOW AND FOREVER! 

There’s a false notion in America that a slut is just someone who sleeps around.

But that conceptualization is antiquated, especially in the modern era. Today’s sluts have ditched hustling on the corner and bar-flying to promise weak willed or ignorant men romantic opportunities in return for money and attention. And whereas traditional sluts had to put out, these girls are no longer expected to deliver on their end of the bargain. The introduction of the smart phone and social media has birthed a new generation of divas, outfitted with Instagrams, Snapchat dog ears and thousands of men validating them like they’re the last Gatorade in the Sahara desert.

The result is a sexually sterile society. In the age of in-your-face sex everywhere you look (except your bed), women are putting out less than ever.

They’re beneath prostitutes. The Judeo-feminist movement has hit its apex with ‘Sleaze’ – sluts who tease, for cash. Men who go waste their time on apps like Tinder exacerbate the problem. Any woman you can get on Tinder, you can get 100 times better by making moves on them in the real world, which is why you should only use it for laughs.

The problem is that modern men are scared that if they hit on women in the real world, there’s a strong chance they might reject you or get upset about it. Modern men have been raised to hinge their self-worth entirely on what some bitch thinks, and walk on eggshells for Her Majesty’s comfort.

Nevertheless, the whore who started this trend is getting uncritical promotion in female-oriented publications, like (((Steve Swartz’s))) Cosmo.

Cosmopolitan:

How This Genius Woman Is Making Money From Her Tinder Matches

It’s a constant battle to come up with a Tinder bio that’s actually good. But Maggie Archer, a 20-year-old woman from Missouri, seems to have figured it out.

Archer’s Tinder bio, which can be seen in her now-viral tweet, reads: “Send me $5, see what happens,” with the little smirking emoji for punctuation. But why would anyone actually send this woman — or any stranger on Tinder, for that matter — five whole dollars, you may be asking yourself. As Archer’s PayPal history can tell you, it turns out a lot of people (*cough* men *cough*) are more than willing to fork over coffee money just to assuage their curiosity.

…

This is honestly incredible, and Archer knows it. “It’s really a foolproof plan, because I’m not actually promising anything, I just say ‘see what happens,'” she told BuzzFeed News. And it’s — against all logic and reason — working! She even included a screenshot of her PayPal activity in the tweet to prove it. She told BuzzFeed she’s gotten money from at least 20 dudes in less than a week. Folks, you do that math. That’s more than $100, just for a one-sentence bio on Tinder.

Some guys have even gone above the call of duty and offered Archer more than $5. She said the most she’s gotten from anyone was $10, adding that “some men get creepy and assume if they offer a lot more, like hundreds, something will actually happen, which of course it doesn’t.”

It’s easy to get angry at the cuckboys sending this sleaze money, but you also have to understand the context of being a man in 21st century America. Most of the women around you are fat, and they’re even uglier on the inside. They have by and large eschewed all the beautiful aspects of the female yin (nurturing, loyal, submissive) to try and become second-rate men: loudly burping, posting pictures of themselves on the can, getting short lesbian haircuts. Women 18-35 don’t love anyone other than themselves and their shih-tzu. It’s not that they’re bad people, they’ve just been raised to be incapable of it.

The pickens are slim, and the above is just a sign of the desperation that accompanies that – like a thirsty man seeing a mirage.

I’ve never really followed the manosphere closely, but they get a bad rap from the system on par with us. I remember a few years back, Roosh’s attempt at a real world meet up for his followers was met with the same kind of official suppression our groups are hit with. The reason the manosphere is targeted is because Jews know where the path concludes: Nationalsocialism. Their vision allows them to snuff out a future platform of resistance while in its crib.

If the manosphere is able to purge its hyper-individualist libertarian streak – along with the hucksters and scammers rife within it – it can find synthesis, and power, in our alternative.

Young men lacking access to women, decent work, and dignity is a looming background feature in most revolutions. The social conditions are there for us to organize, all that is left is for us to snap men out of their false consciousness. Anyone who passes this up because someone might get offended is a fool.

The solution to women behaving poorly isn’t to get take their childish cruelty personally. It’s to take an iron fist to the mills of this decadence.

Slut-shaming, monogamy and a grassroots political antibacterial that gradually isolates the Jew. If you see a woman pulling this $5 dollar scam, say something hurtful to her.

Swallowing the Reich Pill is a lot harder than buying that man in a purple fuzzy fedora’s cure all for your woman-woes, but our solution is the only sound vehicle for a resurgent masculinity.

As for the detractors who believe the manosphere is anti-social, some of those criticisms are valid – they reject marriage, for example – on paper, but not in practice. The great majority of women are not going to be convinced to get married early, because women respond to top-down incentives and social stigma, not logical persuasion. Without controlling the state, any appeal to women as a group is as impotent as the men seeing what happens when they send a women $5 dollars over Tinder.

Join our struggle for instauration!

If you go to Match.com, you see this:

However, if you go to the Norwegian version of the site, Match.no, you get this:

And it appears to be only Norway which gets this screen encouraging White women to breed with Blacks.

Not even all of Scandinavia – Match.fi:

Match.se (Denmark gets the same image):

It seems that Match.com has a specific desire for Norwegian women to have Black children or (more likely) die trying.

Why?

The site is run by a Jew, of course. Not just any Jew – Barry Diller, the Jew who recently attacked the Donald and “threatened” to flee America if he got elected.

I want to say again that it is well worth your trouble to register and vote for the Donald simply to get rid of this one horrible Jew. Imagine if the companies listed above all got new heads, appointed by The Donald?

Tinder should probably just be shut down completely, as it is a public health hazard, among other issues.

It was also created by Jews, before Jew Diller took over running it.

Amazing how there are Jews everywhere running everything, huh?

Especially when you realize they are only .02% of the world population.

If we’re all created equal, and also Jews are not involved in a massive ethnic networking conspiracy, why are Blacks not running 20% of the world’s businesses, I wonder?

Emotionally bruised after the collapse of her 20-year relationship, Rachel Dilley hoped internet dating would provide romance, a boost to her confidence and, with luck, lasting love.

Just short of 40 and with three teenage children, she thought no one would be interested in her dating profile, which made clear that after two decades of monogamy she was looking for serious commitment, rather than a casual, no-strings relationship.

So she was surprised to find no shortage of men responding. The first date was a crushing disappointment but she hit it off instantly with the second man she met.

A builder in the same age bracket as her, Simon was charismatic and attractive. On their first restaurant date, he showered her with compliments. They liked the same kind of food and music, and he made her laugh and feel desirable again.

Attentive and easy company, he told Rachel he had two children from a previous relationship and — having fallen for him hook, line and sinker — it didn’t cross her mind to quiz him about his sexual history. Fear of causing offence prevented her from even broaching the subject.

Swept up in a whirlwind love affair, it seemed unthinkable to suggest they both undergo tests for sexually transmitted diseases before embarking on a physical relationship — but that’s exactly what she’d do if she could turn back time.

Within three weeks they were lovers and were soon talking about moving in together. She introduced Simon to her children, and was thrilled when they liked him as much as she did. But then, after just three months, it was all over.

Why? She was devastated to find a letter in his flat from another woman, suggesting he was also sleeping with someone else. It was a cruel blow to Rachel’s self-esteem. But the legacy of this ill-fated romance was to prove much more shattering than just a broken heart.

To her horror, she later discovered she had contracted HIV — a disease, she is ashamed to admit, she had always thought affected only people in Africa.

‘I can’t believe how little I knew about HIV and Aids. I thought it was something that happened to other people, not ordinary mums like myself,’ says Rachel, who lives in Harpenden, Hertfordshire.

‘I was completely ignorant. All I could remember was seeing a documentary about Aids victims in Africa and thinking it was a disease, such as malaria, which only happened somewhere else.’

Rachel, now 48, was diagnosed HIV positive after going to her GP following the break-up of her romance nine years ago, complaining of swollen glands, a sore throat, temperature, feverish chills and a small ulcer on her body.

‘The GP asked if I’d been abroad, because my symptoms were similar to malaria, but I hadn’t. When it was suggested I have an HIV test I agreed in the same way a teetotaller might agree to a police breath-test, convinced it would be negative.’

Two weeks later, Rachel was shocked to be told she was HIV positive. ‘My first words were: “Am I going to die?” I thought it was a death sentence,’ recalls Rachel, whose sons are now aged 30 and 28 and whose daughter is 26.

‘I knew nothing about HIV or Aids and everything I read on the internet terrified me. When I told my children, they were devastated. My daughter was so affected she couldn’t speak and my younger son said: “Are you going to die?” I couldn’t have felt more ashamed because I had no one to blame but myself.’

Today, if you were to walk past Rachel you would never even think to ask yourself if she was HIV positive. Well-groomed with an immaculate blonde bob, slim figure and warm smile, she looks like a healthy, attractive middle-aged woman.

With the advances in anti-viral medication, Rachel can expect to live a long and normal life. But with the stigma that still surrounds HIV, she wants other women who recklessly put romance before their own health to take heed of her story.

‘If you have cancer, people feel compassion for you, but with HIV you encounter prejudice and ignorance, she says. ‘Because it is contracted through sexual contact or blood, people assume you either sleep around or are a drug user who sticks shared needles in your arm.

Read More

)

As we swirl down into hell at an ever accelerating rate, it is no surprise that we now have a dating show to encourage Europeans to spit on the graves of their ancestors and destroy their ancient genetic heritage by mixing their blood with the lower races.

Swirlr, a new show airing exclusively on YouTube, is hosted by Christelyn Karazin, a blogger who runs the site beyondblackwhite.com, and encourages the viewer to “date differently” by showing them staged scenes of various persons indulging in interracial fetishism.

[EDIT: Image of Christelyn with her mixed-race family removed, at the request of Christelyn.  See comments. Replaced with an appropriate image. -Ed.]

As someone who, in my youth, did experiment with dating women of another race, I can state plainly that it is not only an issue of the destruction of the sacred DNA heritage, but also creates many practical problems. It is simply very difficult to understand a person who is so fundamentally different on an intimate level. When living in the society of another racial group, sometimes simple behavioral patterns are nigh impossible to understand, so one can surely imagine how much more difficult it is to make the details of a romantic relationship work, where communication is the core of success.

This “reality show” of course follows the Cultural Marxist meme that the only real differences between the races are superficial (skin color, bone structure, etc.), and that the only thing necessary to make an interracial relationship work is to bridge a “cultural gap.” Clearly, there is some biological drive which makes interracial relationships appealing; part of it is sexual fetishism, part of it is a desire to pursue that which is forbidden, and I am sure there are innate parts beyond this, along with the present cultural situation where feminism is driving White men toward Asian women and the emasculation of the White man is driving White women toward black and Mestizo men.

Still though, these factors are mostly overpowered by the internal instinct that there is something wrong with race-mixing, which has generally kept people from engaging in this behavior. The purpose of this show is to break down the internal psychological blocks against mixing by making it appear fun and exciting.

The show is co-hosted by Jordan Harbinger, who also runs some sort of dating advice racket and appears to be a Jew.

Karazin told hlntv.com that the purpose of the show was to encourage viewers to engage in the behavior of race-mixing.