Roger Stone has always been half-Jewish and a little weird, but he’s always been interesting.

He’s always been subliminally pro-Putin.

He’s trying to be sly here, but “adding understanding” – but he’s still going to get canceled and possibly prosecuted at this point.

RT:

Oliver Stone, the Academy Award-winning filmmaker, and vocal critic of US foreign policy, called on his Instagram followers to read several articles to better understand of how Russia came to unleash its military against Ukraine. The Sunday post is meant to counter “all the hysteria of Western media” and its propensity for “omitting key facts when inconvenient,” the director said.

The materials that Stone suggested for reading offer some “helpful and honest analyses” on the Ukraine crisis, he wrote.

The reading list includes articles written by Tony Kevin, who served as Australia’s ambassador in Moscow during the Cold War, Jonathan Steele, an acclaimed British journalist and author, Joe Lauria, the editor-in-chief of news website Consortium News, and Caitlin Johnstone, an Australian anti-war activist who published her analysis in the same outlet.

The takes by Kevin and Steele are now somewhat outdated, considering that, contrary to their expectations, Russia did launch an attack on Ukraine after they were published on February 23.

Lauria’s piece focuses on the February 24 speech that Russian President Vladimir Putin delivered as he announced Russian military action against Ukraine. Johnstone raised criticisms of Western hubris, which she asserted ultimately led to the bloody armed conflict in Ukraine.

Stone’s interviews with Putin are worth watching, though like his articles, somewhat outdated.

His movies are mostly good too.

I recently wanted to rewatch U-Turn after mentioning it in an article, though that would for sure be one of his worst movies.

Scarface will always be my favorite (although he only wrote and didn’t direct that one).

It’s a classic for all of you Zoomers who don’t know shit about anything.

Platoon was of course the most celebrated.

Stone was in Vietnam and made a lot of films about it.

Putin has become a kind of Scarface character.

Let’s hope for the sake of Christendom and Western civilization he gets a better ending than Tony Montana.

This could be retaliation for his going against the Jewish common interest.

So we’re seeing this “Hollywood sex scandal” thing blowing up at an exponential rate, as more and more actors and other people come up and whine that Jews molested them in exchange for giving them extremely lucrative jobs.

On one hand, it’s very hard to have sympathy for these people, who are essentially whores with a very high price tag. After all, it’s not like they refused these sexual advances and were denied the roles. They’re just now whining that it’s unfair. Boo hoo hoo.

On the other hand, I really, really hate these Jews. So it kind of feels good to see them getting dragged through the mud.

There’s one Jew I don’t hate though, and that’s Oliver Stone.

He’s earned the ire of his kinsman for his anti-semitic remarks, as well as his defense of Russia against their warmongering agenda. As such, he might be deliberately targeted to try and discredit his career and any future activism he might engage in.

NY Daily News:

While Oliver Stone defended Harvey Weinstein amid more than a dozen allegations of sexual harassment and assault, a former Playboy Playmate accused the “Platoon” director of sexual assault.

Carrie Stevens, who was best known as Playboy’s Playmate of the Month in June 1997 but also had several small movie and TV roles, claimed Thursday that Stone had grabbed her breast at a party.

Can you believe this bitch? A Playboy model complaining someone grabbed her titties? I mean, what the hell did she expect, being invited to a Hollywood party? Did she think they invited Playboy models for their conversation?

Carrie Stevens, professional whore.

If this really is the worst they could dig up on Stone, this guy must be a freaking saint.

The 48-year-old model told the Daily News that she was at a party at producer Ted Field’s home in honor of Stone more than 20 years ago when Stone walked up to her standing by the front door.

“He was really cocky, had this big grin on his face like he was going to get away with something,” Stevens, who was 22 at the time, told The News.

At that point, Stone “reached out and…honked it like a horn,” she said, describing him as “an immature guy in elementary school who snaps your bra.”

Stevens said she was surrounded by other people, but nobody said anything.

Yeah, they were probably too busy snorting cocaine off of the other hooker’s butts, you dumb bitch.

I mean, everyone knows, at an intuitive level, that Hollywood is a den of perversion and degeneracy. Some old guy grabbing a tittie is such a mild, inconsequential thing, it’s basically something that most of us have seen in various parties.

When we think of “Hollywood parties,” I think most people imagine something closer to this:

“That’s what’s going on in Hollywood. That’s why things have to change. He’s Oliver Stone. Nobody’s going to say anything,” she told The News.

“He walked up like he was entitled to grab anything he wanted. He did it because he wanted to.”

No, that’s not what’s going on in Hollywood. What’s actually going on is much worse. This is just a stupid distraction, which no one even cares about. “Oh, no, this man grabbed my titties as a joke, woe me!”

It’s increasingly clear that all these dumb stories are just being brought out as a distraction to protect the real predators, who do things much worse than grabbing the odd tittie. And they do it to much more vulnerable “victims” than Playboy models.

But I think this thing is very likely to spiral out of control. A lot more dirt is going to come out and enter the public consciousness than the Jews realize, or are going to be comfortable with.

The righteous anger of the people will be roused when we contemplate the depth of Hollywood’s depravity, and we will scream for blood.

While the entire Western world is rushing to transform itself into a large Islamic Caliphate, where White are ruled over by irate monkey people, and all of our women are auctioned off to Arabian and Paki government officials, Putin is just all like “nah, brah.”

The interesting fact here is that the Islamization of Europe in itself creates an existential threat to Russia.

When Islamic governments are established in Germany, France and the UK – which is something that is an absolutely certainty in the next 15-20 years, if we continue on this same path – a bunch of irate brown people are going to be in control of Western military equipment, and Russia will obviously be their next target for conquest.

RT:

Over a third of the jihadists in Syria are foreign mercenaries, who include Russian nationals, Vladimir Putin told Oliver Stone, adding that, while Russia wants to work with the US in the fight against Islamic State, it won’t compromise its own security.

Commenting on Russia’s military engagement in Syria, the Russian president highlighted the stark difference in the scope of the operations carried out by the US-led coalition and those conducted by the Russian Air Force at the height of Russia’s involvement in the anti-terrorist campaign.

Putin said, at one point, Russian jets carried out “an average 70-120 strikes per day,” while “the entire international coalition led by the United States [conducted] two, three, five strikes per day.”

“There is a difference. Everyone sees it,” Putin noted.

Moscow has repeatedly stated that its primary goal in Syria is to ensure that the jihadists who came to fight for Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS, ISIL) will not return to Russia and employ their battleground experience to carry out attacks.

“Thousands of militants from the former Soviet Union and from today’s Russia are fighting there [in Syria], and they can return to us, and we cannot allow it. All this together led us to the actions that you know about [the anti-terrorist campaign in Syria],” Putin said.

The Russian leader said some 30,000 of the 80,000 terrorists operating in Syria are foreign fighters that come “from 80 countries, including Russia,” Putin said.

In April, Russia’s National Security Council estimated that some 2,700 Russian citizens from the country’s predominantly Muslim North Caucasus republics have gone to Syria and Iraq to become jihadist militants.

Nevertheless, talking about the roots of Islamist extremism, Putin argued that “no world religion can be a source of evil.” He also said he believes the “divisions” that are currently “running deep” between Sunnis and Shiites are reconcilable.

“I think they will eventually overcome them,” he told Stone. When asked if Moscow could someday become part of a caliphate, Putin said that Russia “will not allow this to [happen].”

Right now, there is the Eastern European barrier between the rapidly Islamizing Western Europe, but that won’t last forever.

Because Poland and Hungary and the Baltics refuse to pull out of the EU, they are eventually going to have Islamization forced on them by Brussels.

Russia will then have Islamic states on all of its borders. Which is obviously a highly undesirable position for that country.

If I were Putin I would just start nuking European capitals.

But hey, that’s probably why I’m running a Neo-Nazi White Supremacist blog instead of running some nuclear power.

Because if I had nuke buttons I would be pushing the shit out of them right now.

Everyone’s shit would get all fucked up and I’d just be like “LOLOLOLOL.”

Nah, I’m just playing. Nukes are old news.

I’m all about biological weaponry. If you released race specific viruses in Europe and killed all their precious niggers, it would cause hell to break loose.

That would not only be more efficient, it would also be way funnier than just nuking Berlin, Paris and London.

tfw a TV interview is a vicious interrogation and still has to be censored before it can be shown to the stupid goyim.

I can tell you with 100% certainty that if the SPLC didn’t inspire a political assassination attempt yesterday, this would be the biggest story of the week.

I mean, talk about proving our points for us.

Editing mention of Israel out of an interview?

This is Jewish-controlled media becoming a parody of itself!

Page Six:

Oliver Stone started a “cringe-worthy” fight about Israel with Stephen Colbert on the latter’s CBS show that never made it on-air.

A Page Six source who was in the audience for the taping of the network’s “The Late Show With Stephen Colbert” on Monday told us that the political spat was “painful to watch.”

The audience member explained that as Colbert pressed Oscar winner Stone — who was promoting his new Vladimir Putin Showtime series, “The Putin Interviews” — on his apparent sympathy for the Russian president in spite of claims about Russian interference in the US election, Stone, at a disadvantage, tried to shift the talk to Israel.

The source said they “watched from behind [their] hands” as Stone said words to the effect of: “Israel had far more involvement in the US election than Russia.”

HOW IS THIS CONTROVERSIAL????

PLEASE READ OUR ENTIRE DETAILED REPORT ON ISRAELI ELECTION MEDDLING ON BEHALF OF HILLARY CLINTON.

THERE IS NO ONE WHO CAN ARGUE WITH THESE FACTS – THAT IS WHY IT GETS EDITED OUT OF TV SHOWS!

The “Platoon” director further challenged Colbert by saying, “Why don’t you ask me about that?” — but we’re told that the host shot back, “I’ll ask you about that when you make a documentary about Israel!”

(The source described Stone’s Israeli argument as “a classic anti-Semitic canard.”)

Meanwhile, the parts of the discussion that did make it to air Monday night were called “fiery,” “tense” and “bizarre” by critics.

The tête-á-tête seemed to go off the rails when the audience groaned with incredulity as Stone swooned about Putin, “He’s been through a lot. He’s been insulted and abused . . . abused in the press, in the media.”

They cheered when Colbert said, “Anything about him negative that you found? Anything? Anything?” Colbert also asked, “What do you say to the people who will say this is a fawning interview of a brutal dictator?”

Yeah.

Buzzwords supersede facts on the kike controlled media, with their vicious Danny Boys who are ready to give their lives for their hook-nosed masters.

This is absolutely outrageous.

The interview was hostile from the beginning, as Stevie Boy had heard warning that Stone had a plan to steal his lucky charms.

All hail Oliver Stone – I don’t care if he is half Jew, this man is a Bobby Fischer-tier half-Jew standing up for the white race against the evil international parasite.

He got away with saying the Holocaust needed more research because of his genetic link to the tribe. Even though what he said was 6,000,000 times worse than what Mel said – and he said it sober. But Mel is 100% pure Bavarian phenotype Aryan master race.

But what he just did here – openly calling out the Israeli election meddlers on TV to the point where the Jews felt the need to edit it out – this will end his career. His half-blooded state can’t protect him after that.

This is absolutely fantastic.

If they could just berate him for it – and Stevie Boy’s responses were so cutting that the audience mocked Stone for his “anti-Semitic canards,” then why did it need to be removed from the show?

Meanwhile, on network television…

How often does this happen, that they cut someone politically incorrect out of an interview for the Late Show?

I have never heard of it happening before. It probably has happened before, but I’m not aware of it.

God bless you, Mr. Stone.

And I can promise you, after the revolution, if you’re still with us, we’re going to make you assistant director of Hollywood affairs – right beneath Mel himself.

Here’s the part of the interview that made it on air.

Washington Free Beacon:

The portion that aired was unusually tense for a “Late Show” interview, as Colbert pressed Stone over the “fawning” tone of his Putin interviews. They were conducted over the course of 20 hours in a two-year span, and the Washington Post described the previews: “If the glimpse so far is any indication, the Oscar winner lobbed a lot of softballs at the Russian leader and took the dictator’s words at face value.”

Stone said one has to be “polite” in defense of a clip in which he simply accepted Putin’s claim that he did not interfere in the 2016 U.S election, which 17 U.S. intelligence agencies said did happen.

“That doesn’t seem like an interview,” Colbert said. “That seems like an opportunity for him to merely propagandize.”

Stone, who has expressed open affection for far-left strongmen like Hugo Chavez and Fidel Castro, defended Putin as a “strong nationalist” who is “devoted to his country.”

“I’m amazed at his calmness, his courtesy,” Stone said. “He never really said anything bad about anybody. He’s been through a lot. He’s been insulted and abused.”

Some in the crowd mockingly laughed and booed when Stone suggested the autocratic Putin had been “abused,” to which he defensively said Putin was abused in the press. Colbert asked whether Stone had anything negative to say about Putin, joking that the Russians perhaps kidnapped his dog.

Stone became visibly frustrated with the crowd and Colbert over their stance, at one point snapping he did not know why the audience laughed at his description of Putin as a “social conservative.”

He also claimed support for freedom of speech, to which Colbert shot back that Putin seemed an unusual person to defend given accusations he has faced of killing journalists.

Putin kidnapping dogs sounds like something the kike media and their Danny Boys would say seriously – not as a joke. This whole “kills journalists” is on par with dog kidnapping. Although journalists obviously should be killed, and not doing that could in itself be considered the worst crime of Putin or any other leader.

That is to say “Putin refuses to kill journalists” would be a better line of attack than falsely claiming that he does without ever offering any evidence. You can quite easily prove that he doesn’t kill journalists, and that’s something that should make people a lot angrier.

I haven’t gotten a chance to watch the show yet, but I will by this weekend and write up a report.

It looks very, very good, and I’ve read it even goes over the CIA funding the Chechen monkey to blow-up Russian train stations – something which hasn’t been talked about really at all.

For those of you who haven’t gotten this through your heads yet:

RUSSIA = GOOD

WEST = BAD

Obviously, it is more complicated than that, as everything in life is more complicated than that, but in the reduced form, that is the ultimate truth of these matters.

That is why the entire agenda against Trump is designed to stop him from mending relations with Russia.

Here’s part one and two.

Don’t know if they’ll call copyright or not, but here they are now.

“He’s not a traitor, but it was wrong” is a frighteningly nuanced take on the Edward Snowden leaks.

It’s almost as if we’re dealing with a global leader who thinks in more colors than “black” and “white” (note that neither black or white are true colors).

As I explained yesterday, I am very much looking forward to this Oliver Stone documentary on Putin, to be shown in four parts on Showtime.

The first part airs June 12th at 9 PM EST.

For those of you without TV, I’m sure it will be available online. For those of you who live in countries who have not signed international copyright treaties, such as Switzerland, I’m sure you’ll be able to find it on a certain Pirate Ship.

Interesting Note

Yesterday, I noted that Oliver Stone is an interesting person, who is half-Jewish on his father’s side but was raised Christian. I pointed out that by Jewish law, he would not be considered a Jew, as Jewish lineage is determined through the maternal lineage.

Someone noted that they don’t care what Jewish law is, that they care what NSDAP law is, and the NSDAP would have considered him a Jew.

I replied:

This is not exactly true.

I’m not exactly sure why it isn’t widely known that modern internet Nazi blood laws are much, much more extreme than the Nuremberg laws.

A half Jew was allowed to gain citizenship in the Reich under certain circumstances.

Nuremberg Laws – Reich Citizenship Laws – Wikipedia

Stone also would have been eligible to apply for a German blood certificate, which would have given him full rights, effectively being considered a pure German.

Mischling – Wikipedia

The fact that he was raised Christian would have been a big benefit to him in the application process. The fact that he has openly stated opposition to the Jewish agenda and publicly named Jews as offenders contributing to the decline of Western civilization and the world as a whole would also have played greatly in his favor.

#To be clear

I’m not even saying that this is right or wrong, but to say that the National Socialist Germans were somehow as strict about this stuff as modern internet comments section people is just wrong information or a lie.

To be clear: if you want to take this position, that is certainly fine and I might even agree with it, but do not cite the Nazis as a reason for taking this position, as then you are just – purposefully or non-purposefully – spreading false information.

The fact that modern internet comments section people are so much more extreme when it comes to race than the Nazis themselves is an interesting issue.

As I said in my reply, I am not going to say that I disagree with it. Obviously, at some point it does become ridiculous and goofy. My DNA test, which I posted here, came back with 99.3% European, .7% “unassigned.” This means that I could potentially be 1/128th non-White (that’s 2-4-8-16-31-64-128 – seven generations back). This certainly does not bother me personally, I I am quite certain I do not think we should be saying “100% PURE OR YOU’RE OUT” as a policy.

At the same time, I have seen people (cough, some guy on TRS, cough) say that the measure should be 75%, which to me is insane.

That would include this guy (the Black Lives Matter speech guy from that doctor show):

In all honesty, the entire “WHO IS REALLY WHITE THOUGH??????” question seems to be a result of autism in the movement, as well as shills, who use questioning people’s Whiteness as a way to cause division. Before I posted my DNA, there were feminists claiming that I was secretly a gook-nigger mix, because they had allegedly done some analysis on the shape of my nose.

So the whole issue, in my opinion, should mostly be avoided. We should draw the lines of “who is White” at “who was included in historical Christendom,” and be done with it. We shouldn’t question the whiteness of Southern Europeans, nor should we start talking about how some Turks or Iranians or Mestizos can be White.

When it comes to Jews, it’s more complicated, because Jews have been with us so long, mixing blood with us, that the overwhelming majority of them only have a relatively small trace of Semitic blood, and the Semites were already a Caucasoid race. The problem with the Jews is that they are not even a race, they are, as Rosenberg said, an “anti-race” – they have mixed blood with different races to create an entirely new race, and then they have obsessively interbred with themselves to ensure certain psychological and behavioral traits. Ashkenazi Jews have a majority European DNA – for German Jews, it is 70% or more. But even if they bred themselves to 99% European, they would still be Jews, as their Jewish nature is based on the way in which they bred themselves – they selectively choose partners from the host race for certain traits, and it was the Jewish religion that allowed them to choose these traits efficiently.

My analysis yesterday was on how Oliver Stone has demonstrated both Jewish and White characteristics throughout his artistic and political life.

To me, this is fascinating.

But I do think the “WHO IS REALLY WHITE THOUGH????” conversation on the internet has gotten completely out of control.

If someone emails me and tells me they have one Asian or Arab grandparent, I will say “no, you’re not White.”

Conversely, if someone emails me and says they took a DNA test and found they are 1/32nd or 1/64th Indian or Asian, I tell them not to worry about it.

Maybe we do need some math equation here, I don’t know. But I do know that obsessing over it is unhelpful, and I do think that pointing out that the NSDAP themselves, in their own legal doctrine, did not go as far as a lot of internet people, is a helpful fact to point out when people start to get all autistic about it.

ALSO

I hope they’re not driving in Moscow.

Putin really shouldn’t be allowed to drive in Moscow.

Honestly, no one should be allowed to drive in Moscow.

His physiognomy is more goy than Jew, which I believe is relevant.

Oliver Stone is half Jewish.

It’s the father that is the Jewish half, so he isn’t Jewish by Jew legal standards. And he was raised Christian. He is now a practicing Buddhist.

So, he’s a weird one.

His materials tend to be, in my experience, between 35-40% Jewish. I think he has made some good fictional movies. He wrote the screenplays for both Midnight Express and Scarface, both of which I think were very good and not especially Jewish in nature. Well, the ultra-violence of these films could be considered Jewish – I don’t have a strong opinion on that.

I do think the ultra violence of Natural Born Killers was Jewish, given that it was effectively a provocation for young people. There were multiple acts of violence committed by young people copycatting this film. Note that that film was written by shabbos-extrordinaire Quintin Tarantino.

Most of his films in the 80s were just solid, good movies. I would say that Wall Street was the best. Or perhaps Platoon. Either of those could be considered his prime masterpiece.

Most of the films in the 90s and 00s were Jewish in that they simply were not very good.

U Turn was okay, if I recall.

Any Given Sunday was especially bad.

As was Alexander , a biopic on Alexander the Great, which made a point of playing up the unestablished myth that the great king was a homosexual.

I have heard that Snowden was not quite as bad, though I did not watch it, so cannot confirm. It certainly did not do very well at the box office.

His political activism and non-fiction work has been equally mixed in nature.

He has supported communism and socialism in a way I disagree with, and reportedly voted for Barack Obama twice. He supported Ron Paul, citing his non-interventionalist foreign policy, while criticizing his domestic policy (something that a lot of right-wingers criticized as well). In the last election, he was anti-Trump, and first supported Jew Bernie Sanders, then apparently voted for Jew Jill Stein.

At the same time, in 2010, he publicly and aggressively criticized Jewish power, and even claimed that Hitler was “misunderstood,” and came very close to questioning the Holocaust myth itself. He questioned why the supposed six million Jews who died in the supposed Holocaust were more important than the 20 million Christians who died in the Soviet Union. He said that both the media and American foreign policy are controlled by Jews.

He later apologized to Abe Foxman, the then head of the ADL. It is doubtful that if he did not himself have Jewish blood, he would have been able to get away with an apology.

And then, he has been a big supporter of Julian Assange, and supported Russia during the Maidan coup in the Ukraine.

So, all of this is to say – he is a man where you can witness the battle between Jew and gentile happening within his own psyche, something that has for a long time been fascinating to me.

As such, his upcoming Showtime documentary series on Vladimir Putin, which includes extensive interviews with the man himself, is something I have eagerly awaited.

It’s coming out soon, so there are bits and pieces being released.

RT:

Russian President Vladimir Putin once suggested to then-US president Bill Clinton that Russia join the Washington-led military alliance, Putin said in an interview with American film director Oliver Stone.

“I remember one of our last meetings with President Clinton, when Clinton was still in office. He visited Moscow and during a discussion I said, ‘So, what if [we] consider an option of Russia maybe joining NATO,’” Putin said in one of his conversations with Stone.

While Clinton replied that he “didn’t mind,” the rest of the American delegation became visibly nervous, Putin went on to say, smiling.

The conversation was posted on Vimeo by Daniel Lippman as “an exclusive preview clip” of an upcoming Showtime series on the Russian leader. It is said to be part of a four-night special documentary project, ‘The Putin Interviews,’ set to premiere on the American cable network on June 12.

In a separate interview in the preview, Putin called NATO “an instrument of America’s foreign policy,” saying that the US-led alliance “has no allies, but only vassals.” According to the Russian leader, some member states find it hard to resist Washington’s pressure, and thus “anything can be easily placed” on their territories, including both anti-missile and offensive systems.

“And what are we supposed to do? Due to that, we have to take counter measures,” Putin told his American interviewer.

Promoted as “the most detailed portrait of Putin ever granted to a Western interviewer,” it will feature interviews between the director and the Russian leader that were made during several encounters over two years.

So yes.

I think, like most of Stone’s career, this will be very interesting.