Donald Trump is deebly goncerned about the situation in Iraq and the growing menace of Iran! Glad to know that he’s monitoring the situation over there very closely.

There was a US embassy storming that we reported on earlier today. Both the recent guerrilla attack on mercs and the embassy storming are being used as a pretext for preparing the justification for war against Iran. We don’t even know what the story behind the embassy even was.

Did Iran really send Hezbollah to storm the compound?

Like, really? 

POLITICO:

President Donald Trump on Tuesday blamed Iran for a breach of the U.S. embassy compound in Baghdad, asserting that the Islamic Republic “will be held fully responsible” for the siege on the heavily guarded American facility.

The words of warning from the president came after U.S. forces launched a series of airstrikes over the weekend targeting an Iranian-backed Iraqi militia, which the administration claims perpetrated a rocket barrage that killed an American defense contractor at a military compound in northern Iraq.

Tensions between Tehran and Washington have continued to play out in Iraq this week, reaching a boiling point in Baghdad on Tuesday as dozens of Iraqi Shiite militiamen and their supporters broke into the American embassy compound.

Trump went a step further and called for the people of Iraq to rise up against Iran.

To those many millions of people in Iraq who want freedom and who don’t want to be dominated and controlled by Iran, this is your time!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 31, 2019

If Iraq is being dominated by Iran, whose fault is that, exactly? Didn’t the US invade and depose the secular, competent Arab leader of Iraq and then personally hand-pick the government? If Iraq suddenly fell under the sway of Iran, who is to blame here really?

And you know who really is groaning under the boot of foreign occupation? The American people. In particular, Aryan Gamers – citizens of the suppressed Republic of Gamers in these occupied states of America.

Donald Trump, I am calling on you to let my people GO!

Let them be free from the chains of Jewish oppression that have robbed them of a future and of a decent internet connection by internet provider monopolies.

Gamers are tired of not having jobs and the ones that do are tired of being bossed around by psychopathic Boomers who play the same 6 songs on loop all day.

We hate the niggers that your son-in-law Jared the Jew is flooding the country with and we really hate that Big Tech is taking away our right to vent steam because the Jews don’t enjoy our sense of humor.

When are you going to call for the Gamers to rise up against their government, Blumpf?

Have you forgotten? You were supposed to be /ourguy/, but instead you are out there on the last day of 2019 tweeting about the most irrelevant last decade shit. Like, really. Have you no shame? We’re past that now. We at the dawn of a new decade and shilling for Israel’s wars is pretty cringe and gay. It belongs in the past, like bell-bottom jeans and the AIDS scare.

Anyways…

Happy New Year, fam!

I think that we can safely conclude that the last 10 years were pretty garbage overall. Lots of oppreshun of my kings going on by POCs and wahmen.

In fact, most people would rather forget that the 10-20 decade even existed. But this is nothing new; the beginning of a new century is always a strange and turbulent time:

But let’s focus on the positive here. Let me tell you this much right now: we are all going to get girlfriends in 2020 and there’s nothing that the hoes can do to stop us!

Das right, I’m calling it now: the 20s are our decade!

Now sure, it’s going to go full Weimerica out there, but we’re going to rise above it all eventually and finally put a Gamer in the Oval Office, where he will rule for life until his connection drops, we get an F in chat to pay respects and then we let Player 2 take over from where he left off until the end of time.

As far as I’m concerned, the end of 2019 brings us one year closer to the beginning of the Eternal Gamer Reich!

We absolutely needed to invade and occupy these people. For their precious resources… erm, rather, for their industrial capacity… for their opium? Whatever. It was important.

The Afghan war is one of the most absurd conflicts that America has ever engaged in. We’ve been occupying this country for almost 20 years now, with no tangible benefits and no meaningful explanation as to why.

The initial excuse was that Osama Bin Laden was hiding there, so we had to invade the entire country – to find that one guy.

Yet with Bin Laden long dead, the occupation still goes on, and the cost and death toll is still climbing. What’s going on?

To make matters worse, it turns out that even this bleak and absurd situation is actually a complete white-washing – the government has been fudging the numbers and lying about the situation for years, and the situation is actually even worse than what we’d previously thought.

The Guardian:

Hundreds of confidential interviews with key figures involved in prosecuting the 18-year US war in Afghanistan have revealed that the US public has been consistently misled about an unwinnable conflict.

Transcripts of the interviews, published by the Washington Post after a three-year legal battle, were collected for a Lessons Learned project by the Office of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (Sigar), a federal agency whose main task is eliminating corruption and inefficiency in the US war effort.

The 2,000 pages of documents reveal the bleak and unvarnished views of many insiders in a war that has cost $1tn (£760bn) and killed more than 2,300 US servicemen and women, with more than 20,000 injured. Tens of thousands of Afghan civilians have died in the conflict.

ONE TRILLION DOLLARS.

Let that sink in.

Do you have any idea what could be accomplished in America for one trillion dollars?

We could have created an electromagnetic space launch ramp for that kind of money.

That could, by itself, raise America into the space age.

One trillion is enough to build over 100 nuclear power plants.

Enough to generously fund cancer research for decades.

Enough to give out $12,000 to each and every family in America.

And all that money – let alone the lives of U.S. soldiers – has gone straight down the drain, giving absolutely no benefit to actual Americans.

No wonder they’re lying about the war.

The documents have echoes of the Pentagon Papers – the US military’s secret history of the Vietnam war that were leaked in 1971 and told a similarly troubling story of the cover-up of military failure.

Negotiations are taking place between the Trump administration and the Taliban as the US debates whether to withdraw 13,000 troops who remain in Afghanistan.

The interviews were collected, beginning in 2014, in addition to Sigar’s regular audits to identify what could be learned from successive policy failures in Afghanistan.

It’s very hard to believe that the disaster in Afghanistan is due to “policy failure.”

After all, there’s a very simple policy that could have avoided all these problems – get the hell out of there. But for mysterious reasons, we’ve always stuck there seemingly for no good reason.

You can be sure that there’s secret, unsavory reasons why America is occupying Afghanistan. I’ve heard various theories, from an oil pipeline, to opium production, and I don’t know what the reality is.

Most probably, it’s the Jews. They likely invaded and remained simply because it is close to Iran, and they want it for a staging ground for an invasion of that country.

If there wasn’t some nefarious Jew reason behind all this, they wouldn’t have needed to lie through their teeth for all these years.

Two major claims in the documents are that US officials manipulated statistics to suggest to the American public that the war was being won and that successive administrations turned a blind eye to widespread corruption among Afghan officials, allowing the theft of US aid with impunity.

The long-term nature of the manipulation of statistics was detailed in an interview with an individual identified only as a senior “National Security Council official”.

“It was impossible to create good metrics. We tried using troop numbers trained, violence levels, control of territory and none of it painted an accurate picture,” the official told interviewers in 2016. “The metrics were always manipulated for the duration of the war.”

The papers depict the view of many people of a conflict with vague and unachievable war aims, pursued under three US presidents, George W Bush, Barack Obama and Donald Trump, whose alleged successes were presented repeatedly in inflated terms.

In one scathing assessment Douglas Lute, a lieutenant general who served as the White House Afghan war tsar during the George W Bush and Barack Obama administrations, told interviewers in 2015: “We were devoid of a fundamental understanding of Afghanistan – we didn’t know what we were doing.”

Claiming incompetence is always the last line of defense of corrupt government officials. “We used up a trillions dollars of taxpayer money for mysterious purposes, but it was just because we had no idea what we were doing – nothing to see here!”

The people responsible for this need to be executed for high treason – the damage they’ve caused to America is incalculable and inexcusable.

Usually, collaborators collaborate with an occupation force.

That’s just the context in which such a word gets used.

If they Yellow Vests are using such terminology, that means they’re thinking of the government as illegitimate and as an occupation government, not a government of the French people. And this also means we are one more word association away from the French calling their government the Jewish Occupation Government. I believe it is called “JOG” for short.

Breitbart:

Anti-government protesters turned out in Paris and other French cities for the seventh Saturday running, as activists called for direct democracy — to take power out of the hands of political elite — and protested against the mainstream media.

As in previous weeks, many protestors carried placards with the abbreviation ‘R.I.C.’ — “Citizens’ Initiative Referendum”, a demand for popular referendums that would be automatically triggered by any referendum calling for a change in government policy getting 700,000 signatures.

The route of Saturday’s march took hundreds of protestors to the doors of mainstream French television stations, which the Yellow Vests accuse of having aligned themselves with President Macron against the French people. 

The media likes to position itself as the champion of democracy. The only problem is that the people hate the media. And in a democracy, the role of the media is to control what the mass of people are allowed to think. When people have the power to vote, they are too dangerous to be allowed to think freely.

Opinion has to be corralled into acceptable camps. Or political parties.

The more free and democratic your society, the tighter it has to be controlled by the media. 

Certain fundamental concepts can’t be open to critique and challenge. Foreign policy, the structure of the economy and basic shared civic virtues have to be commonly accepted. Eventually, the parties and the national debate devolves into a debate over details.

You let the people choose, but you limit the range of acceptable decisions. 

Ideally, you can corral people into two centrist parties that barely differ from one another.

Mass democracy cannot exist without the mass media controlling opinions. If the people want fundamental structural change in the system, they will quickly find that it is the media that holds the keys to power. Unelected opinion makers who have graduated elite universities and live in parallel communities decide what is acceptable and what is not acceptable discourse in a mass democracy.

The politicians themselves are at the mercy of the media – which can make or break them.

And the media itself, while operating on its own as an independent agency, is also reliant on funds from oligarchs or the state to continue its operations.

Short of storming the private mansions of the oligarchs themselves, attacking the media is the closest thing to hitting the enemy where it hurts that street protestors can do. The target is much softer, the effect more visible.

Future demonstrations need to take this fundamental reality into account. 

Marching on the White House, or on the Capital or wherever… that’s not really going to do much. Marching on the offices of your local Judeo-Globo-Homo rag… now that’s a smart, effective and powerful move.

The hate for the Journalist Class is growing – sped along in the US by the journalists’ emerging role as doxers and Gestapo/NKVD agents for the establishment.

There is now an entire specific category of journalist – the Journifa – who’s role it is to use terror and intimidation tactics on hapless White citizens, to serve as a deterrent to others. These thugs go around smiting people at random and making normal people paranoid that they might be next.

As much as I dislike the coppers, I can’t even put them in the same camp as the Journifa.

The cops are just a blunt, low-IQ and psychopathic tool of terror. The Journifa are the surgical, middling-IQ and ideologically motivated tools of terror.

And I would much rather get into a street war with the latter, rather than the former. 

Bringing the Afghan people freedom since 2001!

Afghanistan continues to be a mess. More Americans have been injured in another insider attack committed by an Afghan soldier.

AP:

An Afghan soldier opened fire on American soldiers on Saturday, injuring at least seven, the U.S. military said. It was the second such insider attack by an Afghan soldier in the past week.

Abdul Qahar Araam, spokesman for the 209th Army corps, confirmed that an insider attack took place at a camp in Mazar-e Sharif. Araam said the soldiers returned fire and killed the attacker.

Gen. Dawlat Waziri, spokesman for the Afghan Defense Ministry, also confirmed the attack.

So much for winning hearts and minds. The Afghan people view American forces as an occupying power. This is not something that can be overcome with more troops or an increase in military assets. When you have soldiers on the inside of the Afghan army attacking American forces with this regularity, that is a bad sign.

The Pentagon is reportedly sending another 4,000 troops to Afghanistan to try and help better the situation. They could send 400,000 troops and it would make no long term difference. The people are not going to support a puppet government propped up by a foreign power.

Everything about this occupation has been a disaster. Even still, it is a small price to pay for spreading freedom and democracy. Oh and let’s not forget about the CIA’s drug trafficking business. That would take a really big hit if American troops weren’t guarding those poppy crops!

Kenneth Gadson, AKA Sgt Ficki

The exploits of Sgt Ficki and the diversity squad have finally been brought into the light as tens of thousands of Japanese people demonstrated against the ZOG/Negro rapist occupation of their country. Around 50-65 000 people were present in one of the largest demonstration against the occupation force in living memory.

RT:

The Japanese island of Okinawa sees one of the biggest demonstrations in two decades, involving at least 50,000 people who protest against heavy US military presence after a local woman was murdered by an ex-Marine and a string of other incidents.

A mayor in France is under fire internationally for telling whining Moslem invader-children they can either eat pork or nothing because he will not be allowing them the option of an alternative meal.

The Local:

Another week in France and another row has broken out surrounding secularism or laïcité as it’s is called.

After town halls were told to remove nativity scenes because they were against the principle of “laicïté” one mayor in the south of France has used the same argument to justify “a pork or nothing” policy in his school.

From January 1st pupils in the little town of Sargé-lès-Le Mans in the Sarthe department of north-western France will not be offered a substitute meal if they don’t eat pork.

This will affect the 15 Muslim pupils in the school who cannot eat pork because it against the dietary rules of their religion. Eating pork is also against the rules of the Jewish religion but it is not believed there are any Jewish pupils at the school.

Mayor Marcel Mortreau says his decision is based on the “principle of Republican neutrality”.

“The mayor is not required to provide meals that respond to religious requirements. This is the principle of secularism,” Mortreau told Europe1 radio.

The Town Hall has also backed its decision on the grounds of logistics claiming its new school meals provider has complained about the extra workload that comes with providing alternative meals when pork is on the menu.

The mayor bowed to their complaints even though providing a second meal costs no extra money, according to France Bleu radio.

Muslim parents and pupils have reacted angrily to Mortreau’s decision.

This may seem like a minor thing, but it is in fact a huge provocation of the occupying Moslem hordes. It is the equivilent to spitting in their faces and then standing there like “what are you gonna do, Haj?”

This will serve to make the hordes even angrier than they were, which will result in more violence, which is always a good thing, as it moves popular opinion against the savages.

Aljazeera
August 5, 2013

The Israeli cabinet has voted to expand the list of illegal West Bank settlements eligible for government subsidies, just days after the resumption of talks with the Palestinian Authority in which settlements are a major issue.

Ministers on Sunday approved a new “national priority map,” a list of poor communities earmarked for housing subsidies and other benefits.

Included on the list are 91 settlements in the occupied West Bank, up from 85 on the previous version. Many of them are in areas which would almost certainly be evacuated by Israel in a deal with the Palestinians.

Three of the newly-added settlements – Rehelim, Sansana and Bruchin – were until recently considered “illegal outposts,” which means they were built without government approval. Their status was normalised last year by a cabinet vote.

Israeli settlements are illegal under international law, and the United Nations and much of the world treats them as such.

The vote comes just days after Palestinian and Israeli negotiators flew to Washington for their first face-to-face meeting in three years.

Read More