Right-wingers sometimes like to paint anyone to the left of them with a wide brush. I always drew a line between the true believers on the left and the Judeo-Liberal shills that work at institutions like the NY Times though.

New York Times:

The Cold War was fought as much on an ideological front as a military one, and the Soviet Union often emphasized the sexism and racism of its capitalist opponents — particularly the segregated United States. And the space race was a prime opportunity to signal the U.S.S.R.’s commitment to equality. After putting the first man in space in 1961, the Soviets went on to send the first woman, the first Asian man, and the first black man into orbit — all years before the Americans would follow suit.

The Americans had to send their blacks into space only after Glorious Stronk Soviet Socialist Empire did.

So this begs the question: is the New York Times now unironically pro-Soviet?

Being pro-Soviet has never been popular. I mean, being a Marxist and a Communist and a Leninist-Maoist or a Trotskyist, has always been popular. But that’s not the same thing as being pro-Soviet.

The only people who were pro-Soviet were unironic Tankies.

But now, the NYT, that bastion of liberalism, is finally giving the authoritarian Bonopartist USSR – that subverted the promised revolution, mind you – its day in the sun?

What in the world is going on here?

Beginning in 1967, the Soviet Union and its socialist allies collaborated on space missions through the Interkosmos program. In July 1980, Vietnamese pilot Phạm Tuân became the first Asian and the first person from a developing country to travel to space.

…

Just two months after Phạm’s voyage, the Cuban Arnaldo Tamayo Méndez became the first person of African descent to go to space, while it would take the U.S. three more years to send an African-American. Like Tereshkova, Tamayo Méndez had impeccable socialist credentials. Orphaned as a baby, he grew up poor and was apprenticed to a carpenter at age 13. He became a revolutionary as a teenager and eventually a pilot in the Cuban Revolutionary Guard. When Tamayo Méndez returned to Earth, Fidel Castro delivered a lengthy speech stressing the cosmonaut’s African ancestry.

Cosmonaut diversity was key for the Soviet message to the rest of the globe: Under socialism, a person of even the humblest origins could make it all the way up. 

Unironically promoting the Communist bloc because of their forced diversity programs… I never thought I’d live to see the day.

This is an exceedingly strange timeline.

Conservatives in the US will no doubt knee-jerk against this latest NYT line of attack by demanding that the president launch more blacks into space than ever before. An entire conveyor belt space elevator of blacks just being ferried round the clock up into orbit.

I say we bite our tongues and just let them.

First things first, look at the ratio of this video.

People are really not liking the fact that Joe sucked up to this NYT Journifa Jewess for three whole hours in the wake of the media lynch mob launched against the Covington Boys.

The highlights:

• Joe calls Catholics a sick cult
• Thinks the hat kid was a smirking asshole
• He expresses concern that the Left trying to kill these kids will convince people to join the far-right
• Admits that the kids did nothing wrong, media blew it out of proportion, but they still sort of deserved it anyway
• Joe literally only began believing in the moon landing after Neil DeGrasse Tyson (Black Science Man) told him to
• The Jewess supports banning Alex Jones and alternative news outlets
• People are ignoring black people beating up Jews in New York and that’s a tragedy
• Criticism of Israel isn’t anti-Semitic, but actually, it is so don’t do it.
• Anti-Semitism, anti-Semitism, anti-Semitism!
• Catholics are anti-Semitic
• Criticism of neocons is anti-Semitic
• Women’s march is anti-Semitic
• Richard Spencer helps rally the entire Left together in mutual hatred

And MAAAAAN, this bitch is sooooo stupid.

It just goes to show that the Journifa aren’t that smart. They’re quite clever and mean and vindictive, sure. But we’re dealing with very middling IQ Jews here – the smart ones went to work on Wall Street.

They just believe the right things and through ethnic nepotism are given all the best jobs. 

Unsurprisingly, the Weiss Jewess doesn’t like Tulsi Gabbard because she’s not a Jewish supremacist like she is.

And she gets absolutely eviscerated in the comments.

Once again, just look at the ratio.

A solid two-thirds of the interview is just Joe asking Bari what her opinions on X person are. Invariably, the NYT Jewess declares said person an anti-Semite.

Whatever. Just an interesting window into the soul of a “moderate” radical Journifa enemy of the people.

But what people are focusing on is Joe’s take on the Covington boys.

It’s sad to see him show his true colors like this.

Forced to admit that they did nothing wrong, Joe still finds time to imply that they are full of hate because they’ve been molested by their teachers and that they’re bad kids overall, but that, yeah, they probably shouldn’t be killed by Leftist mobs.

The original narrative, MAGA Kids sought out Native march, surrounded Phillips and berated him.

Second Narrative, Phillips DID get in their faces but because they taunted black activists

Third Narrative, Hebrew Israelites ARE bad but these kids were still bad too! https://t.co/Dh5OnDdCc6

— Tim Pool (@Timcast) January 22, 2019

Are you detecting a pattern here yet?

Basically, whenever one of these controversies peak up, you see people on the Left, Cuck-Right and “Center” show their true colors and begin howling for White blood. Once the story calms down, or they’re beaten back, they slip the mask back on and retreat to a more tenable position and start pretending to be reasonable and moderate again.

That’s what all the clever ones are doing now, backing down a bit from the initial narrative, but still claiming that the kid deserved to be punched in the face for being smug.

In their minds, this is a concession.

But you know, each time the Anti-White Coalition chimps out, more and more Americans see the way these people act when the mask comes off. And they stop believing the half-apologies that come out later.

You kids have it lucky these days. The media has gotten so deranged and anti-White that it’s easy to see the double-standard and the anti-White animus nowadays.

But way back in the BT (Before Trump) ages, we had a much harder time proving it.

This shit just writes itself now though. You have to be blind not to see the anti-White bias. Willingly blind perhaps.

RT:

The New York Times has stood by its decision to hire Sarah Jeong, a tech journalist with a record of using racist slur on social media, justifying it as ‘anti-harassment’ speech.

It’s so Orwellian I can’t even.

When we stick up for ourselves, it’s HATE SPEECH. But when they attack Whites, it’s…anti–harassment speech.

Lol. That’s pretty dark actually when you think about it lmao.

Conservatives accused the newspaper of bias.

The US newspaper of record announced Wednesday it hired Jeong to join its editorial board. The decision triggered a storm on the social media, as users and outlets on the conservative side of the political spectrum cited the Asian-American reporter’s string of insulting tweets directed at white people. 

And damn, this bitch really hates White people.

Democrats have redefined racism precisely so people like Sarah Jeong can say racist things and still get jobs at the New York Times. pic.twitter.com/ibjWFy5NLi

— Will Chamberlain 🇺🇸 (@willchamberlain) August 2, 2018

And the whole anti-racism thing was never about combating racism.

We’re all starting to figure it out slowly now though.

It was always about destroying whitey.

Critics pointed out that any white person using the same language to describe another ethnic group would have lost his career – and did, as was the case with Roseanne Barr, whose rebooted TV show was cancelled over a racist tweet she posted. According to some commenters, the fact that The Times hired Jeong proved that liberals were perfectly fine with racism as long as it targeted white people.

I-I-is RT wising up to the White Genocide agenda??

And wait, what is this?

Still more rank hypocrisy:

In February, the Times hired another female essayist and journalist covering tech news as a contributor to editorial page. But unlike Jeong, Quinn Norton was fired shortly afterwards, after her history of controversial statements on social media as well as friendship with white supremacist Andrew “Weev” Auernheimer were brought to light. 

Responding to criticism, Norton argued that her online profile was a “doppelganger” of herself and defended her relationship Auernheimer, saying confronting terrible friends in an attempt to change them was the right thing to do, as opposed to denouncing them.

Joeng is also alleged to have fucked weev, but there will be no consequences for her.

All roads lead back to the Daily Stormer

So Norton got fired, the gook stays.

Both are alleged to have fucked an infamous neon-nazi.

I guess the gook stays because gook privilege? I don’t get the difference.

Maybe it’s because dems r real racists, and a white woman ostensibly had the agency to resist weev’s neon-charm, while the submissive gook bitch was caught up in “big white penis, me love you long time Nazi hacker man, me love sucky-sucky your neon wang.”

The Buzzfeed Jew blogger “Blockhead Joe” Bernstein is unhappy with the choice of the NYT (a paper he will never work at) on this matter.

It's pretty remarkable how much of Weev's analysis of the @sarahjeong situation could be lifted from a PragerU video or a Tucker Carlson monologue https://t.co/fjvimSu03X

— Joe Bernstein (@Bernstein) August 3, 2018

The man himself has released a statement on the matter, declaring he values his friendship with this precious submissive oriental sex doll (“slant-eyed fucktoy” may be the more politically correct way to say that – I have a hard time keeping up.)

Which is bringing up some interesting questions…

She’s probably got herself a pretty bad scandal here.

If this falls through, she’s welcome to come work at the Daily Stormer. Not as a writer mind you, but just to hang out in the lobby and give blowjobs to staff members who are on coffee break.

I am always suspicious about stories regarding the rise of anti-semitic attitudes. I think that everyone wants to think it is White goyim waking up, but most of the time the rising anti-semitic attitudes correspond with the higher number of Moslems in a country.

But it is nice to see the NY Times start kvetching, regardless.

NY Times:

For seven decades, “never forget” has been a rallying cry of the Holocaust remembrance movement.

But a survey released Thursday, on Holocaust Remembrance Day, found that many adults lack basic knowledge of what happened — and this lack of knowledge is more pronounced among millennials, whom the survey defined as people ages 18 to 34.

Thirty-one percent of Americans, and 41 percent of millennials, believe that two million or fewer Jews were killed in the Holocaust; the actual number is around six million. Forty-one percent of Americans, and 66 percent of millennials, cannot say what Auschwitz was. Only 39 percent of Americans know that Hitler was democratically elected.

Millennials aren’t really that red-pilled. Those who are would never openly admit to knowing that only a couple hundred thousand kikes died in the camps because they understand the cost of such knowledge.

I think that these Millennials who think only a couple million died are immigrants or just people who skip class a lot.

*giggles* 6 thousand maybe? Idk, I’m bad at math *duckface*

Literally everyone I know knows that six million Jews died in the war. I always ask them if they know how many American soldiers died in the war. They never know so I press the issue. “Why do you know about the 6 million but not know how many of your own people died in the war?”

To that they often say, “well because 6 million is so much.”

And then I parry back, “well, do you know how many Slavs died in the war? There were far more of them killed by Hitler than Jews, why don’t you know that number?”

I find that this is an effective method. Gets the smart normie thinking why the 6 million number is so seared in their minds whereas other historical factoids are not.

Anyways:

“As we get farther away from the actual events, 70-plus years now, it becomes less forefront of what people are talking about or thinking about or discussing or learning,” said Matthew Bronfman, a board member of the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, which commissioned the study. “If we wait another generation before you start trying to take remedial action, I think we’re really going to be behind the eight ball.”

The kikes fear Generation Zyklon.

But brace yourself for a black pill.

Despite the gaps in the respondents’ knowledge, the study found an overwhelming consensus — 93 percent — that all students should learn about the Holocaust at school. And Holocaust denial remains very rare in the United States, with 96 percent of respondents saying they believe the genocide happened.

“The issue is not that people deny the Holocaust; the issue is just that it’s receding from memory,” said Greg Schneider, the executive vice president of the Claims Conference, which negotiates restitution for Holocaust victims and their heirs. “People may not know the details themselves, but they still think it’s important. That is very heartening.”

Clearly, not enough people believe the official Alt-Right stance that the Holocaust never happened…although it should have.

Visitors to the Illinois museum’s Take a Stand Center first watch a five-minute film in which a survivor introduces him- or herself. In one, Fritzie Fritzshall describes being taken to a ghetto at gunpoint during Passover, and from there to Auschwitz.

“I have so much more to tell you,” she says. “So please ask me questions.”

Then the hologram appears, “so real that our audience typically gasps when they see it,” said Susan L. Abrams, the museum’s chief executive.

Holographic Jews, fam. I would be scared of them too. These people are terrorizing the museum guests.

Who would have thought that cutting-edge technology would be dedicated to spooking kids and gullible boomers – but I repeat myself – into hating their race and worshipping kikes.

Like, where else am I going to have to go if I want to see a hologram?

That’s how they get you, those sneaky bastids…