Bill Gates would never commit a crime against humanity.

He loves humanity so much that he even drinks water made out of human poop.

If that is not absolute proof of his unwavering love for humans, then what is?

The Jerusalem Post:

An anti-vaxxer group known as “Anshei Emet” (People of Truth) filed a suit against the Israeli government to the International Criminal Court (ICC) earlier this month, arguing that Israel’s administration of the coronavirus vaccine and policies to encourage vaccination are considered “crimes against humanity” according to the Nuremberg Code.

“It is our intention to present to you and detail how in the State of Israel this year, the Government of Israel with its ministers and its Knesset members, heads of cities, and additional senior factors, violate the Nuremberg Code in an unlawful manner, blatant and extreme. And to our regret, not only in a single aspect but many – too many!” wrote the group in the suit filed through the A. Suchovolsky & Co. law offices.

Anshei Emet argued that Israelis were unlawfully not informed that they were taking part in what they called a “medical experiment” and that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had signed an agreement with the Pfizer company to receive a large amount of vaccinations if Israelis were used as “experimenters.” The suit also argued that the state did not present “alternatives for treating the Corona disease” and concealed information regarding the vaccines.

In an interview last month, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla called Israel the “world’s lab” due to the country’s high vaccination rate, which provides real-world data on the vaccination campaign’s effect on health and the economy. Members of the Helsinki Committee did raise concerns that the agreement with Pfizer could violate privacy rights, as information about the vaccination’s effectiveness is shared with the company.

Anshei Emet additionally claimed in the suit that “many” were killed, injured and severely damaged by the vaccine, adding that the Health Ministry “openly admitted that 41% of police persons, military, education and medical personnel who were vaccinated suffered severe side effects.” It is unclear when and where the ministry did this.

They additionally claimed that there are “no full reports of the numbers of dead or injured,” despite the data from the clinical trials being released and the Health Ministry releasing reports on side effects experienced by those who received the vaccine.
…

The suit also argued that companies and associations that threatened to prevent unvaccinated employees from arriving to work were acting against the Nuremberg Code and that policies preventing unvaccinated people from receiving certain services and entering certain locations were against the code as well. Anshei Emet also claimed that the vaccination policies go against Israeli state law as well.

The group called on the ICC to halt the state’s administration of coronavirus vaccinations and to stop Israel’s policies incentivizing vaccinations.

Mark P. Dillon, head of the Information and Evidence Unit in the ICC’s Office of the Prosecutor, reportedly acknowledged receipt of the suit and stated in a letter to the group that it would be considered, but that this “does not mean an investigation has been opened, nor that an investigation will be opened by the Office of the Prosecutor.”

The Nuremberg Code, published originally in the judgement of an American military tribunal in 1947 against Nazi doctors, laid out guidelines for medical experimentation, including the requirement for consent and the need to avoid suffering and unnecessary risk. While the exact code was never adopted in any official policy, it has served as the basis for medical ethics policy in a number of countries.

You might wonder about Jews rebelling against the Israeli government – well, you see, Jews are always rebellious. That is their nature. And they will at certain times rebel against other Jews, especially if you get them all together in a place like Israel.

It is very interesting that Israel is being chosen for the seat of this vaccine oriented empire, but it does make sense when you understand that Israel is intended to be the main seat of power of this new world order.

The new world order is satanic, and it is an inversion of God’s order, so they want their capital of evil to be where once was God’s capital of goodness.

Don’t think that just because Jews are taking the vaccine, it must not be harmful. Something that you would consider harmful might not be harmful to Jews. A lot of people are dying from the vaccine, but that is clearly not its main goal – its main goal is something to do with genetic engineering.

I heard a new age woman say that when you change your DNA, it disconnects your body from your soul – and that wouldn’t be a problem for Jews, would it? I don’t know if I would take that statement literally, but I think it is a good metaphor.

Jews have also never had a problem with race-mixing, and bringing other races into their gene pool, which is another form of genetic engineering.

What’s more: what it looks like is that this first vaccine is just laying the groundwork for further genetic engineering, which could do a number of different things. Israel could build on the genetic engineering framework in a different way than what is used on the rest of the world.

Israel’s Nazi Nuremberg Laws-based citizenship rules are not strict enough to preserve Jewish racial purity and more needs to be done to prevent non-Jews from marrying Jews, that country’s chief rabbi has declared.

Interviewed by the Israeli newspaper Ynetnews, Israel’s Chief Rabbi David Lau—the single most powerful and influential Jewish religious leader in the world—said that his nation’s “Law of Return” was letting too many non-Jews into the country.

The “Law of Return”—which allows persons with Jewish heritage three generations back to immigrate to Israel—is, according to the Ynetnews, specifically based on the Nazi Nuremberg Laws which defined who was a Jew—and which are, ironically, paraded by the Jewish Supremacist-dominated media as the ‘apex of evil.’

The article, titled “Chief rabbi: Stop allowing non-Jews to make Aliyah” (Aliyah is the Hebrew word for Jewish immigration to Israel), quoted Chief Rabbi Lau in connection with a discussion of a recent study in Israel which revealed that people who are not defined as Jews in terms of Halacha (Jewish religious law) were getting in to Israel by exploiting the weak definitions of who is a Jew as contained in the Law of Return.

According to the article, some “nine million people from around the world are eligible for Israeli citizenship despite the fact they are not Jewish according to religious law.”

Someone who is Jewish by Halacha is defined as a child born to a Jewish mother. According to Reform Judaism, a person is a Jew if they were born to either a Jewish mother or a Jewish father, while according to Orthodox Judaism, the father’s religion is irrelevant as long as the mother was Jewish. Both strands therefore demand racial-genetic-descent in order to qualify as Jews.

The debate currently underway in Israel is therefore how far back this racial descent must stretch.

This situation—where Jews who are not Jews “according to religious law” has prompted Israel’s chief rabbi to demand that the Law of Return be tightened to exclude these “non-Jews.”

Chief Rabbi Lau told Ynetnews that “we must change the Law of Return immediately so it will include only those who are Jewish according to the halacha.

“Israel can decide to be the third world’s welfare state, but as long as that decision has not been taken—it needs to stop allowing non-Jews to make Aliyah,” Rabbi Lau said.

Lau went on to give what he called a practical example of how whet he views as “non-Jews” are immigrating to Israel under the current Law of Return definition:

Rabbi Lau gives as an example which he says he is personally acquainted with: “Because of one Jewish grandfather who is buried in Moscow, over 73 people (his children and grandchildren) moved to Israel through the Law of Return.”

The Chief Rabbi then went on to say that the “the biggest threat this poses [the weak Law of Return definitions] is inter-faith marriages”—in other words, letting non-Jews into Israel is creating the situation where they can marry with Jews, and dilute the pure Jewish blood in that country.

The article then goes on to explain exactly how the Israeli citizenship laws are based on the Nazi Nuremberg Laws:

There are roughly 14 million Jews around the world, but over 23 million people eligible for citizenship, a new study claimed as the government authorized a massive overhaul for the conversion process.

According to the study by Prof. Sergio DellaPergola from the Harman Institute of Contemporary Jewry at the Hebrew University, as of the beginning of 2014, the number of Jews (people born to Jewish mothers) stands at 14,212,800 (a 0.66 percent increase in comparison to 2013).

If you take into account those born to Jewish fathers, but non-Jewish mothers, the number rises to 17,236,850.

The number jumps to 22,921,500 when you take into account people who can trace Jewish ancestry three generations back—the maximum allowed by the Law of Return.

The definition is similar to the one laid out by the Nazi’s Nuremberg Laws, and is thus understood to be Israel’s response to the threat posed to Jews by anti-Semitism based on racial—as opposed to religious—criteria.

In a move that some observers  have likened to the enactment of the so called ‘Nuremberg Laws’ by National Socialist Germany in 1935, the Israeli cabinet have by a 14 to 7 majority,  approved a controversial bill that officially defines Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people.

The new legislation is designed to reserve “national rights” for Jews only and to deny such rights to minority groups; Arab Muslims and Christians, who currently comprise 20% of Israel’s population. It asserts Israel’s Jewish character as a fundamental facet of the state and seeks to institutionalise Jewish law as the basis for all future Israeli legislation.

The bill, which still requires the Knesset’s approval to become a law, comes as tensions between Israelis and Palestinians rise sharply, and friction within Israel’s Arab minority grows.

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has argued that the law is necessary because people are challenging the notion of Israel as a Jewish homeland.

“There are many who are challenging Israel’s character as the national state of the Jewish people. The Palestinians refuse to recognise this and there is also opposition from within”, he said.

Netanyahu reportedly confirmed that Israeli Jews would enjoy rights that will be denied to minority groups. He said that while all could enjoy equal civil rights, “there are national rights only for the Jewish people – a flag, anthem, the right of every Jew to immigrate to Israel and other national symbols.”

Furthermore, referring to Palestinian freedom fighters Netanyahu said, “It cannot be that those who harm Israel, those who call for the destruction of the state of Israel, will enjoy rights like social security”.

Some critics have condemned the proposed measures as racist, however nationalists will appreciate the desire of Jews to retain Israel as an ethnic homeland although we can’t help but comment upon the clear double standard demonstrated by Zionist Jews in the Diaspora, who prominently campaign in favour of the abolition of national identity and the acceptance of multiculturalism where the nations of Europe and the West are concerned, but who simultaneously defend the right of Jews to maintain the state of Israel as an ethnic homeland.

Regular readers of this forum will recall an earlier article in which the state of Israel has demonstrated that providing the political will exists, and contrary to what leftist and ethnic minority rights groups in this country may claim, nations can successfully adopt policies of ethnic or racial nationalism, including compulsory repatriation.