It’s not going to work for a nuclear war.

Not these ones they’re selling.

A deep one works.

But some kind of bunker may help you in the case of some other sort of disaster.

AP:

When Bernard Jones Jr. and his wife, Doris, built their dream home, they didn’t hold back. A grotto swimming pool with a waterfall for hot summer days. A home theater for cozy winter nights. A fruit orchard to harvest in fall. And a vast underground bunker in case disaster strikes.

“The world’s not becoming a safer place,” he said. “We wanted to be prepared.”

Under a nondescript metal hatch near the private basketball court, there’s a hidden staircase that leads down into rooms with beds for about 25 people, bathrooms and two kitchens, all backed by a self-sufficient energy source.

With water, electricity, clean air and food, they felt ready for any disaster, even a nuclear blast, at their bucolic home in California’s Inland Empire.

“If there was a nuclear strike, would you rather go into the living room or go into a bunker? If you had one, you’d go there too,” said Jones, who said he reluctantly sold the home two years ago.

Global security leaders are warning nuclear threats are growing as weapons spending surged to $91.4 billion last year. At the same time, private bunker sales are on the rise globally, from small metal boxes to crawl inside of to extravagant underground mansions.

Critics warn these bunkers create a false perception that a nuclear war is survivable. They argue that people planning to live through an atomic blast aren’t focusing on the real and current dangers posed by nuclear threats, and the critical need to stop the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

Meanwhile, government disaster experts say bunkers aren’t necessary. A Federal Emergency Management Agency 100-page guide on responding to a nuclear detonation focuses on having the public get inside and stay inside, ideally in a basement and away from outside walls for at least a day. Those existing spaces can provide protection from radioactive fallout, says FEMA.

But increasingly, buyers say bunkers offer a sense of security. The market for U.S. bomb and fallout shelters is forecast to grow from $137 million last year to $175 million by 2030, according to a market research report from BlueWeave Consulting. The report says major growth factors include “the rising threat of nuclear or terrorist attacks or civil unrest.”

“People are uneasy and they want a safe place to put their family. And they have this attitude that it’s better to have it and not need it then to need it and not have it,” said Atlas Survival Shelters CEO Ron Hubbard, amid showers of sparks and the loud buzz of welding at his bunker factory, which he says is the world’s largest, in Sulphur Springs, Texas.

Hubbard said COVID lockdowns, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the outbreak of the Israel-Hamas war have driven sales.

On Nov. 21, in the hours after Russia’s first-ever use of an experimental, hypersonic ballistic missile to attack Ukraine, Hubbard said his phone rang nonstop.

Ron Hubbard

Nonproliferation advocates bristle at the bunkers, shelters or any suggestion that a nuclear war is survivable.

“Bunkers are, in fact, not a tool to survive a nuclear war, but a tool to allow a population to psychologically endure the possibility of a nuclear war,” said Alicia Sanders-Zakre at the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons.

Sanders-Zakre called radiation the “uniquely horrific aspect of nuclear weapons,” and noted that even surviving the fallout doesn’t prevent long-lasting, intergenerational health crises. “Ultimately, the only solution to protect populations from nuclear war is to eliminate nuclear weapons.”

Researcher Sam Lair at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies says U.S. leaders stopped talking about bunkers decades ago.

“The political costs incurred by causing people to think about shelters again is not worth it to leaders because it forces people to think about what they would do after nuclear war,” he said. “That’s something that very, very few people want to think about. This makes people feel vulnerable.”

Lair said building bunkers seems futile, even if they work in the short term.

“Even if a nuclear exchange is perhaps more survivable than many people think, I think the aftermath will be uglier than many people think as well,” he said. “The fundamental wrenching that it would do to our way of life would be profound.”

That’s been a serious concern of Massachusetts Congressman James McGovern for almost 50 years.

“If we ever get to a point where there’s all out nuclear war, underground bunkers aren’t going to protect people,” he said. “Instead, we ought to be investing our resources and our energy trying to talk about a nuclear weapons freeze, initially.”

James McGovern

McGovern pushed back against FEMA’s efforts to prepare the public for a nuclear attack by advising people to take shelter.

“What a stupid thing to say that we all just need to know where to hide and where to avoid the most impacts of nuclear radiation. I mean, really, that’s chilling when you hear people try to rationalize nuclear war that way,” he said.

You are going to want to cover the hatch.

That’s important.

You don’t want someone stumbling on your hatch and opening it to get your food.

Ultimately though, once the apocalypse comes, you are going to want to be mobile, at least for the first year while you’re waiting for the blacks to die off.

Now we have information from our intelligence that the Russian military has placed objects resembling explosives on the roof of several power units of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. Perhaps to simulate an attack on the plant. Perhaps they have some other scenario. But in… pic.twitter.com/RWbykc72cL

— Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) July 4, 2023

This week, both Russia and the Ukraine were saying that the other was going to blow up the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP), which is the biggest nuclear plant in Europe. This would cause nuclear radiation to leak out all over the place, potentially drifting towards Western Europe.

Basically, Zelensky claimed on July 4 that Russia had mined the reactors and was planning to blow up the plant (which they have controlled for 16 months and view as Russian property) for some unspecified reason.

Mr. Zelenskyy, why would Russia destroy the pipeline, destroy a dam, and destroy this power plant? Wouldn’t they want to avoid instigating NATO into the conflict? It seems more advantageous for Ukraine to do all of these things. Please explain.

— Michael R. 🇺🇸 (@hx_variant) July 4, 2023

BWAHAHAHahahaha!!! 😂🤣😂🤣😂

Why would Russia attack their own nuclear power plant? Zelensky lying again.

— 🇺🇸 Phoenix Ash Ultra Incarnate 🇺🇸 (@phoenixash007) July 4, 2023

Zelensky said they were going to blow it on the night of July 5, and Russia, countering this, said that Zelensky must be planning to blow the plant with missiles on July 5.

Obviously, if the plant did blow, it would be the Ukrainians. The media would freak out and blame Russia and this would be used to justify a NATO invasion.

For the record, when Russia was freaking out and making a lot of noise to try to prevent the Ukraine from doing this, they called the UN and asked them to check for mines. The UN confirmed that there are no mines.

RT:

Specialists from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) have found no signs of any mines at Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP), the UN agency said in a statement on Wednesday, following an inspection carried out by its staff at the site.

The experts checked some parts of the facility, including “sections of the perimeter of the large cooling pond,” over the past days and weeks, the statement said, adding that they also “conducted regular walkdowns across the site.”

So far, no “visible indications of mines or explosives” have been observed, IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said in the statement.

At time of writing, it’s now late night in the region, and the Ukrainians have yet to attack the plant.

There have been several other situations like this during the war, and the Ukraine has actually attacked the plant before. I think Russia is wise to make a lot of noise when Zelensky starts giving dates for the plan to blow it up, but overall, I think that this is sort of like a drill: they are drilling it into people’s heads that Russia will – at some point and for no reason – blow up their own nuclear plant.

The threats from Zelensky also caused serious panic.

I would just assume that the US has done AI simulations and come to the conclusion that the best way to gain popular support for an invasion of the Ukraine by NATO is to blow up the power plant.

Maybe they will, maybe they won’t.

We’ve also heard recently about negotiations, and I suppose that this threat to blow up the plant and use that as a pretext for a NATO invasion might be viewed as useful to the West.

Who the hell knows.

As a basic matter, it could probably go either way – maybe NATO full invasion, maybe total surrender.

It is clear that if NATO was going to invade, they would go ahead and wait until every Ukrainian male is dead.

Please be aware: this means that Zelensky is planning on blowing up the nuclear plant.

Russia is obviously not going to blow up their won nuclear plant – I really shouldn’t have to explain why they would not do that – so the only possible reason Zelensky would make this claim is that it is what he is planning to do.

The Guardian:

Russia could be ready to provoke a localised explosion at Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant, Ukraine’s President Zelenskiy has said.

Zelenskiy cited Ukrainian intelligence as the source of his information and called for greater international attention to the situation at the facility, the largest nuclear plant in Europe. Since seizing it last year, Moscow has turned it into a military base from which it has bombarded Ukrainian towns across the Dnipro reservoir.

They actually didn’t turn the nuclear power plant into a military base. Zelensky has made that claim in order to justify shelling near the plant. The UN report on this was censored, but the implication was exactly what I’ve said – and they actually sent a team there. (They obviously couldn’t report what was actually happening, because Ukraine is purely good because they do anal and are Jews.)

Russia is using the plant to produce power, and is protecting it.

“There is a serious threat because Russia is technically ready to provoke a local explosion at the station, which could lead to a [radiation] release,” Zelenskiy told a joint news conference in Kyiv with the visiting Spanish prime minister, Pedro Sánchez.

Earlier on Friday, Ukraine’s military intelligence directorate (GUR) claimed that Russian troops were reducing their presence at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, with staff told to relocate to Crimea and military patrols scaled back.

The agency’s chief, Kyrylo Budanov, has alleged that Moscow has approved a plan to blow up the station and has mined four of the six power units, as well as a cooling pond.

According to the GUR, several representatives of Russia’s state nuclear energy agency, Rosatom, have already left. Ukrainian employees who stayed at the plant and signed contracts with Rosatom had been told to evacuate by Monday, preferably to Crimea, it said.

On Thursday Ukraine conducted nuclear disaster response drills in the vicinity of the power station, regional officials said.

Russia’s UN ambassador, Vassily Nebenzia, replied saying that he had written to the UN security council and secretary general, António Guterres, to state: “We do not intend to blow up this NPP [nuclear power plant], we have no intention of doing so.”

lol.

Yeah, the UN knows.

Everyone knows.

Except white women. But white women literally start fist fights with bears. They’re retarded.

🚨#BREAKING: Over 400,000 gallons of radioactive water has leaked from a nuclear plant

📌#Monticello | #Minnesota⁰
The Minnesota Department of Health and other state agencies are currently monitoring the Xcel Energy Monticello Nuclear plant after over 400,000 gallons of water… https://t.co/8EnbMACez2 pic.twitter.com/ZCeyH37plz

— R A W S A L E R T S (@rawsalerts) March 17, 2023

UNRESTRICTED WARFARE ALERT!

400,000 gallons of RADIOACTIVE WATER leaked from Minnesota’s Xcel Energy Monticello 5 months ago and was NOT disclosed to the public.

But no worries, Xcel says the public is safe.

These people are trying to KILL us! pic.twitter.com/GFEf4dCExa

— Stew Peters (@realstewpeters) March 17, 2023

Don’t worry. America is totally fine, and we are really developing nicely on the way to utopia.

Sure, we might be accidentally dumping radioactive waste into the environment, but on the flip side, we have a booming child tranny industry rivaled by none.

China and Russia can say “you don’t look that well, you’re having all these disasters and your banking system is collapsing.” But to that I reply: “show me your child trannies.”

I’ll take a nuclear wasteland filled with frolicking child trannies over a clean environment with nothing but CIS scum any day of the week.

At some point, we’re going to have to admit: America is no longer on course to becoming a utopia. America ALREADY IS a utopia.

New York Post:

At least 400,000 gallons of radioactive water leaked from a Minnesota nuclear power plant in November — but officials only publicly revealed the spill on Thursday.

Minnesota regulators shared the disconcerting development on Thursday and said they have been monitoring the cleanup from Xcel Energy’s Monticello nuclear plant.

While the energy company reported the leak of water containing tritium to state and federal authorities and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission last fall, state officials said they waited to tell the public until they had more information.

The four-month delay in announcing the leak to the public sparked an alarm over public safety and transparency. However, industry experts on Friday said there was never a public health threat as the radioactive water never reached a threshold that would have required public notification.

“This is something that we struggle with because there is such concern with anything that is nuclear,” said Victoria Mitlyng, a spokesperson with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. “The concern is very, very understandable. That is why I want to make extra clear the fact that the public in Minnesota, the people, the community near the plant, was not and is not in danger.”

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency spokesman Michael Rafferty said Thursday that officials knew that one of the plant’s monitoring wells contained tritium in November but “Xcel had not yet identified the source of the leak and its location.

“Now that we have all the information about where the leak occurred, how much was released into groundwater and that contaminated groundwater had moved beyond the original location, we are sharing this information,” Rafferty said.

Xcel said the leak came from a pipe between two buildings.

Tritium is a radioactive isotope of hydrogen that occurs naturally in the environment and is a common by-product of nuclear plant operations. It emits a weak form of beta radiation that does not travel very far and cannot penetrate human skin, according to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

The chemical only poses a health risk to people who consumed a large amount of tritium, according to Edwin Lyman, director of nuclear power safety with the Union of Concerned Scientists. The risk is contained if the plume stays on the company’s site, which Xcel Energy and Minnesota officials said is the case.

Don’t let smug people tell you “everything is fine, schizo.”

Those people are having very serious personal problems. Smugness is always a self-protection mechanism, to cover self-doubt.

Many of the leftists – all of them that are smug, which is basically all of them – know somewhere in their mind that this is all looking very, very bad. That is why they overcompensate with the smug countenance.

🚨 400,000 Gallons of Radioactive Water Leak from Minnesota Nuclear Plant

A broken pipe at Xcel Energy’s Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant leaked about 400,000 gallons of water containing radioactive tritium, and the utility is working to clean up the contaminated plume, state… https://t.co/nM4l8eQuGo pic.twitter.com/ElohWuSzuh

— Mariana (@lonestarherd) March 17, 2023

Zelensky during the 68th Annual Session of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly in Spain, November 21, 2022.

Both Russia and Zelensky are calling on the world to do something about the Ukrainian shelling of a Russian-controlled nuclear power plant in the former Ukraine.

Zelensky is demanding someone protect it from Zelensky, and Reuters is reporting this with a straight face.

Reuters:

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy urged NATO members on Monday to guarantee the protection of Ukraine’s nuclear plants from Russian sabotage, a day after the Russian-controlled Zaporizhzhia plant was rocked by heavy shelling.

“All our nations are interested in not having any dangerous incidents at our nuclear facilities,” Zelenskiy said in a video address to NATO’s Parliamentary Assembly in Madrid.

“We all need guaranteed protection from Russian sabotage at nuclear facilities,” he added.

The Russian-controlled Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant in southern Ukraine was shelled on Saturday and Sunday, raising concern about the potential for a serious accident just 500 km (300 miles) from Chornobyl, site of the world’s worst nuclear disaster in 1986.

In another article, Reuters suggested Russia was lying about the Ukraine being responsible for the shelling, against suggesting that Russia is shelling itself.

This was the headline:

Just imagine it.

Reuters:

Russia said on Monday that shelling of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant risked unleashing a grave nuclear accident and repeated accusations, denied by Kyiv, that Ukrainian forces were to blame.

The Kremlin called on “all countries of the world” to pressure Kyiv into ceasing the attacks, for which Ukraine says Russia is responsible.

The repeated shelling of the plant in southern Ukraine, which flared again at the weekend, has raised concern about the potential for a serious accident just 500 km (300 miles) from Chornobyl, site of the world’s worst nuclear disaster in 1986.

Reuters was unable to independently verify which side was responsible for the weekend shelling.

I think it’s safe to assume that the enemy is the one doing the shelling. This system of claiming that every single thing the Ukraine does is a false flag has gotten absolutely surreal. Who are these false flags being performed for, if the Western media is just going to call everything uncouth the Ukraine does a false flag anyway?

And why would Russia want to risk blowing up the power plant and triggering a NATO invasion? We know that the Ukraine has been demanding a NATO invasion, including after they attacked Poland and tried to blame it on Russia.

Really, there is no thought to any of this. We live in a democracy, so there is total censorship, total information control, and few people have access to any information that’s real. People hear about Russia shelling a power plant and don’t exactly understand the implications of it being “under Russian control.” What that means, which Reuters doesn’t go into much detail about, is that Russia is using the plant to power territories that they’ve seized. The plant is up and running, and the staff (who are Russian speakers of the former Ukraine) have continued to run it without problems.

What Reuters and other Jewish media are suggesting, apparently, is that the Russians are staking out in the parking lot of the plant and firing shells at it. It’s quite comical to think about. Imagine the staff of the plant walking in for work, and passing the soldiers who are there for the daily shelling of the plant and saying “good morning, Ivan, hey, good morning Dmitri” – both know that if it were to blow, they would die.

Obviously, it can be seen on satellites that the Ukrainians are the ones doing the shelling. There isn’t really a mystery, even if someone could believe what the media is saying about Russia doing it themselves. Moreover, the UN went there and filed a report and it was blocked from release. Now the UN just comes out and says “whoever is doing it, you’d better stop!”

This has been going on for months. Russia took the plant in March and Zelensky started shelling over the summer. It was weird to begin with, but now it’s gotten scary, because the media is pushing the narrative that there is going to be a nuclear incident in the Ukraine and that this will justify a NATO invasion.

Clearly, NATO can invade any time they want by staging a nuclear hoax. However, Zelensky and his people also heard the news, so they have reason to cause a nuclear incident by causing the plant’s reactor to melt down.

#UPDATE Ukrainian nuclear energy agency Energoatom said Sunday Russia shelled the territory of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant, shortly after Moscow accused Kyiv of hitting the site of the power station. pic.twitter.com/Qvp6mGExBP

— AFP News Agency (@AFP) November 20, 2022

Why would you shell your own nuclear power plant???

These Russians are totally bonkers!

Reuters:

Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, which is under Russian control, was rocked by shelling on Sunday, drawing condemnation from the head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog who said such attacks risked a major nuclear disaster.

Repeated shelling of the plant in southern Ukraine has raised concern about the potential for a grave accident just 500 km (300 miles) from the site of the world’s worst nuclear accident, the 1986 Chornobyl disaster.

More than a dozen blasts shook the Zaporizhzhia plant, which Russia took control of shortly after its February invasion of Ukraine, on Saturday evening and Sunday, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said.

An IAEA team on the ground said there had been damage to some buildings, systems and equipment at the plant, Europe’s largest nuclear power station. The IAEA team could see some of the explosions from their windows.

“The news from our team yesterday and this morning is extremely disturbing,” U.N. nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi said in a statement.

“Explosions occurred at the site of this major nuclear power plant, which is completely unacceptable. Whoever is behind this, it must stop immediately. As I have said many times before, you’re playing with fire!”

Who indeed.

It’s so funny the UN is not allowed to say the Ukraine is doing it and have to pretend it’s some kind of mystery, and maybe Russia is shelling their own plant.

Zelensky tried to bomb the UN inspectors when they went to visit the plant, and then the report was blocked from being released.

It’s just goofy.

⚡️⚡Head of Chechnya Ramzan Kadyrov published a video of the shelling of the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant by the Armed Forces of Ukraine pic.twitter.com/VrpHYZDXkm

— War Monitor (@WarMonitors) November 20, 2022

⚡️The results of the shelling of the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant. pic.twitter.com/LIhMikD59Q

— War Monitor (@WarMonitors) November 20, 2022

We have predicted that the most likely entry point for the US into the war is via some kind of nuclear hoax.

If the Ukraine blows up the power plant, that will fit the bill. Americans are so fat that they can’t think straight (brain filled with fats) and they will believe whatever story they’re told.

The Republicans right now are saying that we need to look at where the money is going in the Ukraine. They will quickly change their tune if some great media spectacle about “nuclear” appears.

It’s all so tiresome.

It’s the Ivans, sir. They’ve hit again. This time, they’ve blown up their own power lines.

New York Post:

Russian attacks were reported across large areas of Ukraine on Thursday, with heavy shelling in numerous regions damaging infrastructure, including electricity supplies to Europe’s largest nuclear plant, Ukrainian officials said.

The Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant in southern Ukraine has again been disconnected from the power grid after Russian shelling damaged the remaining high voltage lines, leaving it with just diesel generators, Ukraine nuclear firm Energoatom said.

The plant, in Russian hands but operated by Ukrainian workers, has 15 days’ worth of fuel to run the generators, Energoatom said.

Russian strikes were also reported in Kriviy Rih, in central Ukraine, and in Sumy and Kharkiv, in the northeast. Heavy fighting was ongoing in the eastern regions of Luhansk and Donetsk.

“The enemy is trying to keep the temporarily captured territories, concentrating its efforts on restraining the actions of the Defence Forces in certain areas,” Ukraine’s general staff said on Thursday.

Russia has said it targeted infrastructure as part of what it calls its “special military operation” to degrade the Ukrainian military and remove what it says is a potential threat against Russia’s security.

It is truly amazing that we are the better part of a year into this war, and not a week goes by without some story about Russia attacking itself.

If the Russians occupy the power plant and area around it, wouldn’t that mean the shelling is from the Ukrainian side? Otherwise they’d be shelling themselves, no?

— cody (@presidentholt) November 3, 2022

I support Ukraine, but the original tweet makes no sense. For the power plant (which Russia occupies) to be damaged it means that either Russia is shelling themselves, or Ukraine is shelling the plant. What other answer is there for damage to the plant?

— cody (@presidentholt) November 3, 2022

💥️ #BreakingNews SHELLING NUCLEAR POWER PLANT #Ukraine: Residents of #Zaporizhia have confirmed about 15 explosions in power unit No. 6 of the #Zaporozhye nuclear power plant by the #Kyiv terrorist regime.
Smoke rises above the nuclear power plant.#Russia 🇷🇺 #Donbass 🇷🇺 pic.twitter.com/du1HCIy2p9

— Militant.André.D (@Circonscripti18) August 15, 2022

Previously: The Ukraine to Attack Russian-Controlled Nuclear Power Plant to Stop Russians from Attacking It Themselves

Show me what democracy looks like!

This is what democracy looks like!

RT:

The Ukrainian military has fired multiple rockets directly at coolant systems and nuclear waste storage site inside the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant in Energodar, local government administration member Vladimir Rogov told Russian media on Tuesday. He warned that a successful strike may result in a radiation release equivalent to a “dirty bomb.”

“One of the guided missiles hit just ten meters” from the barrels with spent nuclear fuel,” Rogov told Soloviev Live. “Others hit a bit farther away, 50 to 200 meters.”

Since the storage site is out in the open, any hit will result in the release of nuclear waste ranging from dozens to hundreds of kilograms and contamination of the area, the official explained. “In plain language, that would be like a dirty bomb,” said Rogov.

While the reactor itself can only be destroyed with a tactical nuclear weapon, the coolant systems and waste storage are far more vulnerable and damage to them could easily cause a disaster, the official said. Ukrainian troops have already fired “several dozen” heavy projectiles at the cooling systems, Rogov added. If they succeed in disabling such a system, it could produce a meltdown bigger than the 1986 catastrophe at Chernobyl.

Russian troops established control of the Zaporozhye NPP, Europe’s largest facility of the kind, early on in the course of military operations in Ukraine. Russia and Ukraine have been accusing each other of shelling the facility, warning that combat in the area could trigger a nuclear disaster. Russia accused Ukraine of launching artillery and drone strikes on the facility, denouncing the operations as “nuclear terrorism.” Ukrainian troops claimed that the Russians were shelling themselves to discredit Kiev.

The Western media was just following the Zelensky party line, saying that Russia was bombing itself again. This is the ongoing meme: whenever the UAF does anything totally insane, the media just says Russia did it. Remember they said that Russia bombed its own POW camp filled with Ukrainian neo-Nazis going to trial for war crimes?

(It might have just been women on Twitter and The Guardian claiming Russia was bombing itself over the weekend. I didn’t see the NYT/WaPo/CNN machine saying it. We reported on The Guardian saying it.)

At what point do journalists become complicit in this pending nuclear disaster. This ridiculous article in the Guardian accuses Russia of mining and shelling the nuclear power plant it has controlled since march. Stop the propaganda and send in the IAEA https://t.co/FoXHF1gAZX

— Glenn Diesen (@Glenn_Diesen) August 13, 2022

However, with this latest round of attacks by the Ukraine on a nuclear power plant in Russian held territory on Tuesday, the media is just talking about “attacks” on the nuclear plant without saying who is doing it.

A few hours ago, women on Twitter were still claiming that Russia is bombing its own power plant (that it has controlled since March) without explaining how that makes any sense in any way at all.

Russia: launches missiles over Ukraine’s nuclear power plants.

Ukraine: opens a S.T.A.L.K.E.R.-themed supermarket.

Love it! Thanks @GSC_GW, @silpo_ua pic.twitter.com/na6tB50r0t

— Daryna Antoniuk (@daryna_antoniuk) August 16, 2022

But look at this ABC News report:

FLEEING NUCLEAR PLANT SHELLING: Thousands are fleeing the area near Europe’s largest nuclear plant amid growing fears of a potential nuclear disaster as fighting there intensifies. @BrittClennett reports from inside the exclusion zone in Ukraine.https://t.co/SY7lJu8SkV pic.twitter.com/Z97oXgbO7O

— World News Tonight (@ABCWorldNews) August 17, 2022

They don’t have the nerve to blame Russia because it is just too darn silly, so they just act like this is some force of nature. They do not say that the Ukraine is doing it, because everyone knows that the US could just tell the Ukraine to stop bombing the nuclear plant and they would have to do that, because the entire Ukraine people military is funded by the US, and these are US missiles being shot at the plant.

If it actually does blow up and create nuclear fallout, the Western media will I guess just say Russia did it, which is why you have these bizarre reports making it sound like the missiles are a natural disaster.

Seriously, can you think of any potential act more desperate than bombing a nearby nuclear site?

I think nuclear fallout is exaggerated. We don’t have problems in Hiroshima. We don’t have problems in Fukushima. It’s not that big of a deal. But it is a pretty big deal.

Moreover: you look like a complete lunatic, bombing a nuclear power plant. I get that Americans are so fat and retarded that the media can just ban people from Twitter for saying that Ukraine Democracy is bombing nuclear sites – but what about Germany? Do Germans support bombing nuclear sites? Is it worth it to Germans to freeze to death so that Ukraine Democracy Jews can create a nuclear crisis in Europe?

Here’s the thing: Russia already has more land than they were demanding. So, we’re already in a position where if the Ukraine would have immediately surrendered, they would be better off. No one actually ever believed that the Ukraine was going to win, unless they were just the dumbest morons on earth sucking the teat of Jew media.

So what exactly are “we” fighting for at this point? “Democracy” is not a thing that people fight wars for, and anyway, the Ukraine is not a “democracy” by anyone’s definition. They don’t have open elections or media. All opposition political parties and opposition media is banned, and people are raided and arrested and have their assets seized if they disagree with Zelensky.

A logical thing to fight a war for is land. But the fighting of this current war is causing the Ukraine to lose land. They would have more land if they had surrendered – better yet, they would have more land if they had just not provoked the war in the first place. At this point, every day they keep attacking Russia they are losing more land. So what is going on? Why are people supporting this? They told everyone the Ukraine could win a war with Russia, and it is impossible to believe that now. Even for the stupidest retard, it is impossible to believe that.

So why is the war continuing?

Frankly, it doesn’t even make sense in terms of trying to drain Russia’s morale. The sanctions against Russia boosted their economy, and the whole country has rallied around Putin because the entire Russian race is under attack. So, even from a ZOG perspective, continuing this war is a deranged, bizarre, confusing action.

Whatever.

Never forget: the Ukrainians did Chernobyl.

Though as much as I like STALKER and other nuclear fallout related games and fiction… it’s a total myth. A nuclear power plant blowing up is not a big deal.

RT:

Ukraine’s outdated energy infrastructure could struggle to cope with the simultaneous firing of all its nuclear power plants at the same time, with the strain increasing the risk of dire consequences akin to the Soviet-era Chernobyl disaster, one of the Eastern European nation’s veteran politicians has warned.

Speaking on Ukrainian TV Channel ‘Nash’ on Monday, Gennady Moskal, the former head of both the Lugansk and Transcarpathian regions, poured scorn on state enterprise Energoatom’s recent decision to bring all of its 15 nuclear power units online simultaneously for the first time in history.

“I pray we get through the heating season so we don’t get some kind of Chernobyl,” he said. “Don’t boast, dear people, God willing, Energoatom will survive.”

Moskal also advised fellow citizens to “go to church and light a candle in order to survive this winter, and that the power units do not go haywire with such consequences that were in Chernobyl,” referring to the explosion of Reactor 4 at the power plant on April 26, 1986.

The disaster, which has been described as the world’s worst nuclear accident, occurred during the Soviet era. Tens of thousands of people were displaced as a result of the incident and the government implemented a 30-kilometer-radius exclusion zone.

I don’t know what this even is.

Reads like fake news.

Probably some pre-programming to blame some crisis on Russia.