Previously: NPR Whines About Being Hit with “State-Affiliated Media” Label on Twitter

Elon is doing some sort of wacky stuff, frankly.

Reuters:

Twitter chief Elon Musk has “threatened” to reassign National Public Radio’s Twitter account to another company, the U.S.-based broadcaster said on Tuesday.

Musk suggested that he would reassign the network’s main account, under the @NPR handle, to another organization or person, NPR said.

NPR stopped posting content to its 52 official Twitter feeds last month in protest against a Twitter designation that implied government involvement in its editorial content.

Musk, in an email to an NPR reporter, asked about its engagement with Twitter, the public broadcaster said.

“So is NPR going to start posting on Twitter again, or should we reassign @NPR to another company?” NPR quoted Musk as saying.

“Our policy is to recycle handles that are definitively dormant,” he said in another email. “Same policy applies to all accounts. No special treatment for NPR.”

I don’t care that he’s doing this.

But I don’t see what the goal or purpose of it might be.

NPR is on Bluesky now. Get fucked Elon. You’re watching this site crumble before your eyes. pic.twitter.com/6msTe45TNB

— Alejandra Caraballo (@Esqueer_) May 3, 2023

The BBC has always had a “state media” label. I don’t know if they had one on Twitter, but they openly advertise that they are state media and everyone knows they are state media.

Why is it that the same would not be the case for “National Public Radio”?

I do not know the answer to that, and after reading this article from NPR whining about getting a “state-affiliated media” label on Twitter, I still do not understand the complaint.

Bill Chappell writes:

Twitter added a “state-affiliated media” tag to NPR’s main account on Tuesday, applying the same label to the nonprofit media company that Twitter uses to designate official state mouthpieces and propaganda outlets in countries such as Russia and China.

NPR operates independently of the U.S. government. And while federal money is important to the overall public media system, NPR gets less than 1% of its annual budget, on average, from federal sources.

Fact check alert! Weasel wording!

In actual reality, NPR gets more than 10% of its budget from “federal, state, and local sources.” This is on their own website:

The CPB – the Corporation for Public Broadcasting – is a federal government source:

They say “we only get less than 1% of our money from the feds” and then list 8% from CPB. This is just weasel wordsmanship that allows them to cite this “less than 1%” bullshit. They mean that less than 1% is given to them directly and the other 8% is given to them indirectly, via a semi-autonomous government-run foundation, apparently, which is obviously just designed to purposefully confuse people.

This article absolutely needs to be fact-checked with Twitter Notes, because this is one of the most dishonest things I’ve seen in the last hour or so.

Noting the millions of listeners who support and rely upon NPR for “independent, fact-based journalism,” NPR CEO John Lansing stated, “NPR stands for freedom of speech and holding the powerful accountable. It is unacceptable for Twitter to label us this way. A vigorous, vibrant free press is essential to the health of our democracy.”

Yeah, sure, faggot.

You people literally did a hit piece on Rob Monster for hosting news websites you disagree with.

In that article, they questioned Monster about how he banned me from his services – all parties agreed that I should not have a voice, even though I’m AN AMERICAN CITIZEN who has never been convicted of any crime (except maybe drug driving and cocaine possession – I don’t remember). I’ve certainly never been accused of terrorism or anything else that would mean I do not have a right, under the First Amendment, to do journalism.

I just did a search – there are dozens of articles on NPR calling for me to be silenced.

They even promoted that humanoid slug Talia Levin and her crusade to silence absolutely anyone on the earth who thinks they have a right to question “God’s chosen people.”

Don’t say you stand for freedom of speech. That is demonstrably bullshit. You can say “oh except for Nazis.” But even if I was a Nazi – and I’m not – that is what “freedom of speech” means – everyone gets to speak freely.

You faggots, like the rest of the Jewmerican media, actively work to suppress any form of dissent in media.

This stupid lie coming after the stupid lie about the 1% federal funding makes me wonder if instead of the “state-affiliated media” tag, NPR should get the “lying Jew rats” tag.

NPR officials have asked Twitter to remove the label. They initially assumed it was applied by mistake, NPR spokesperson Isabel Lara said. “We were not warned. It happened quite suddenly last night,” Lara said.

Oh my! They came in the night to tag me!

Stfu, CUNT.

In response to an NPR email for this story seeking comment and requesting details about what in particular might have led to the new designation, the company’s press account auto-replied with a poop emoji — a message it has been sending to journalists for weeks.

When asked about Twitter’s decision during the White House’s daily briefing, press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre declined to address Twitter’s content rules specifically. But she also defended NPR’s journalism.

“There is no doubt of the independence of NPR journalists,” Jean-Pierre said. “If you’ve ever been on the receiving end of their questions, you know this.”

Oh yeah okay, you dumb black bitch.

Twitter’s owner and CEO, Elon Musk, acknowledged the new tag was applied to NPR. Responding to a tweet about the shift, Musk posted an image of a screenshot showing Twitter’s policy defining state-affiliated media, with a short message: “Seems accurate.”

Seems accurate pic.twitter.com/nx5TmJY7GX

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 5, 2023

Twitter’s policy describes state-affiliated media as “outlets where the state exercises control over editorial content through financial resources, direct or indirect political pressures, and/or control over production and distribution.”

As recently as Tuesday, Twitter’s policy page stated explicitly that NPR would not be included in this label — before the wording was altered to remove NPR.

The definition fits. I’m sure there is much more direct editorial control by the feds than we know, and I’m sure that if we knew the real story about the media – like we know the real story about social media as a result of the Twitter Files – CNN, NYT, WaPo, and all of the rest of the main outlets would meet this definition as well.

This is the author, Bill Chappell:

How do these men develop these feminine features?

They all have this same look, like they were grown in a lab.

I’m so sick of the media.

It’s just incredible that they are still getting away with it, after all these years, having been proven to not only be shameless, gutless liars, but also to be involved in a conspiracy to silence anyone who questions their narratives.

This is in fact a criminal conspiracy. I was deprived of my Constitutional rights by media working with the government. This is a crime.

I can show very serious damages to myself, obviously, but I can also show damages to the United States of America as a whole.

I’m getting more than 5,000 followers a month now that I’m allowed back on Twitter. If I hadn’t been banned in 2015, I would now have millions of followers and be one of the most important political commentators in America.

We’d be living in a very different country if that was the case, no?

People have to have freedom, and democracy deprives people of freedom.

We need to end American democracy, and we need to do it quickly.

This is very normal.

It’s exactly like in the 1990s.

People who think that everything has gotten very weird are schizo. Playing abortions on the government radio is extremely normal.

The Daily Signal:

On Thursday morning, NPR played an abortion on air.

NPR’s Michigan “Morning Edition” on Thursday featured Kate Wells explaining that a Michigan woman aborted her 11-week-old baby at Northland Family Planning in metro Detroit.

“Like many patients at Northland, she said I could record her procedure,” Wells, a reporter, says of the mother in the NPR segment.

“Most patients are partially awake during the procedures, they get IV medication for pain and anxiety,” the reporter continued. “The lights are dimmed, there’s soothing music, it actually feels a lot like a childbirth, in a medical gown, your bare legs and stirrups, and a person next to you, saying, ‘You can do this.’”

Staffer Brandee can be heard telling the mother, “Just keep breathing.”

In the background, the listener can hear the vacuum aspirator machine turn on. According to an October story Wells wrote about the incident: “The machine uses gentle suction to remove” the baby “from the patient’s uterus through a thin tube.”

“Blow it out, blow it out, breathe through,” Brandee tells the mother.

The listener can hear the mother moaning over and over as the vacuuming noise continues.

The noise stops.

“You did it,” someone finally tells her.

“Thank you guys so much,” the mother says weakly.

“You are welcome!” someone responds.

“You did great!” another person says cheerfully.

I almost didn't want to tweet this but it's something everyone needs to know. NPR on the radio this morning played audio of a woman getting an abortion. You can hear the vacuum turning on, crying, moaning, and the doctor telling her it's done.

Warning: It's tough to listen to. pic.twitter.com/nlSNz0m5Ka

— Greg Price (@greg_price11) November 3, 2022

In her October piece for Michigan Radio, Wells notes that abortion clinics “are almost always closed to press.”

“But Michigan Radio got a rare degree of access to Northland Family Planning, a group of clinics in suburban Detroit,” she wrote. “For nine days in August and September, we shadowed a doctor and clinic staff through every step of the process.”

More than two dozen women shared their stories with Michigan Radio, Wells added.

“Northland Family Planning gives every patient numbing medication applied to the cervix, and strong pain and anxiety medications (fentanyl and midazolam) administered intravenously,” Wells wrote of the abortion clinic. “Some patients also get a cervix softener a few hours before the procedure to make dilation easier, depending on how far along their pregnancy is.”

“Once a patient was fully relaxed, Lance would use a speculum to view inside the patient’s vagina, then clean the vagina and cervix with gauze and antiseptic,” she continued. “She then would dilate the cervix, while Brandee monitored the patient’s vitals.”

Wells disputed on Twitter that her story is pro-abortion.

The night before her abortion, Melissa dropped her kids off w/ grandparents, drove nearly 4 hrs, and got to a hotel in MI around 3 am. She's part of the record surge of out of state patients coming to MI for abortions post-Roe. 🧵 https://t.co/NrRY6lurun

— Kate Wells (@KateLouiseWells) October 26, 2022

“Abortion is on the ballot in Nov,” she wrote. “I’d argue that getting to see what’s actually happening in clinics right now isn’t biased, it’s factual.”

“Last year, nearly 30k MI women got an abortion in this state,” she continued. “We’ve all heard a million campaign ads. We want our MI audience to have the opportunity to hear and see what’s actually happening directly, rather than from a political campaign. That’s what news should do.”

The NPR segment quickly sparked horror and condemnation from users on social media.

“This clip puts on full display the what an abortion actually is: violence and full on dehumanization of the unborn,” tweeted digital strategist Greg Price. “That’s why it’s important to share. To show reality.”

“So listen to that audio. It’s incredibly tough but it’s important,” he added. “Listen to it and then think to yourself about how the only pitch the Democrat Party is making to the voters in the midterm election is more of that.”

“A recording of a murder,” tweeted the pro-life group Live Action. “Outlaw abortion now.”

The mindset now is that abortion is a positive good. Younger people may not even realize how different this message is from the message of the Democrats just a few years ago, when abortion was portrayed as a tragedy, but something that was occasionally unavoidable.

Okay, that’s it.

I’m exclusively using black emojis from now on.

Plus the Indian guy in the turban.

No more yellow for me.

RT:

Washington-based National Public Radio was ridiculed on Wednesday after it published an article which analyzed what skin color emojis were ethical for various races to use.

The article, titled, ‘Which skin color emoji should you use? The answer can be more complex than you think’, featured interviews with people of various races who discussed the racial justice components of cartoon emojis and whether it is OK for white people to use dark-skinned or ‘neutral’ yellow characters.

Some white people may choose 👍 because it feels neutral — but some academics argue opting out of 👍🏻 signals a lack of awareness about white privilege, akin to society associating whiteness with being raceless.https://t.co/9g3rochT0K

— NPR (@NPR) February 9, 2022

“Some white people may choose [the yellow thumbs up emoji] because it feels neutral – but some academics argue opting out of [the white thumbs up emoji] signals a lack of awareness about white privilege, akin to society associating whiteness with being raceless,” the NPR article stated.

It was noted in the piece, however, that some white people purposely use dark-skinned emojis in overwhelmingly white spaces to “even the playing field.”

The article was quickly ridiculed online, with critics mocking the amount of effort the three reporters who contributed to the piece supposedly put into it.

Incredible that it took *three* NPR employees to write something this stupid. pic.twitter.com/8KtXWN0sIz

— Christopher F. Rufo ️ (@realchrisrufo) February 9, 2022

Conservative commentator Lauren Chen wrote, “Measuring ‘privilege’ through emoji usage is the most privileged thing I’ve ever heard.”

“So important we fund this work with our tax dollars. Thank you NPR,” former New York Times tech reporter Nellie Bowles said.

If the blacks want to stop me from using black emojis, they’re gonna have to kill me.

Come at me.

The BBC was doing this years ago

🧵 245 years ago today, leaders representing 13 British colonies signed a document to declare independence.

It says "that all men are created equal" — but women, enslaved people, Indigenous people and many others were not held as equal at the time. https://t.co/dtE0z2Uabc

— NPR (@NPR) July 4, 2021

In this thread of the Declaration of Independence, you can see a document with flaws and deeply ingrained hypocrisies.

It also laid the foundation for this country’s collective aspirations — the hopes for what America could be. pic.twitter.com/znLSGKWLaj

— NPR (@NPR) July 4, 2021

As I suppose you would expect at this point, US state media used the opportunity of the national celebration of Independence Day on July 4 to attack the Declaration of Independence, which was signed on that day 245 years ago.

The heat is really getting turned up on calling out America as evil from its founding, as Jews move in for the killshot.

The entire NPR staff gathered to attack our founding document. They featured a picture of their entire staff, which is made up of white women, Jews, various brown people and what appear to be extinct apes, possibly resurrected through some kind of Jurassic Park style genetic engineering process.

Each of these fiends read two or three sentences from the document in the strange presentation.

In one of their tweets announcing the attack piece, they refer to “deeply ingrained hypocrisies.”

Of course, you could only actually read that through a modern lens. Otherwise, the document was very straightforward.

The NPR piece has an intro before the reading (which they’ve apparently done every year for 32 years).

Over the past 32 years, Morning Edition has broadcast a reading of the Declaration of Independence by NPR staff as a way of marking Independence Day.

But after last summer’s protests and our national reckoning on race, the words in the document land differently.

It famously declares “that all men are created equal” even though women, enslaved people and Indigenous Americans were not held as equal at the time.

What then follows is a long list of grievances and charges against King George III that outline the 13 North American British Colonies’ intentions to separate from Great Britain.

The list, originally written largely by Thomas Jefferson, was edited by the Continental Congress. Among the Congress’ changes: it deleted a reference to “Scotch & foreign mercenaries.” It turns out there were members of Congress who were of Scottish descent. To win support from Southerners, the Congress removed criticism of the African slave trade.

But a racist slur about Native Americans stayed in.

The passage charges that King George III “excited domestic insurrections” among the colonists by Native Americans, who the founding document called “merciless Indian Savages.”

Okay, let’s unpack this.

“Lands Differently”

Firstly, it is insane to say that the words “land differently” after the Fentanyl Floyd riots. As we’ve explained here six million times, the BLM stuff was all of the exact same stuff that happened in the 1960s during the black “protests” of that era. There was no new ideological angle, other than that it went in a really bizarre, destructive direction.

It was the equivalent to the first JJ Abrams Star Wars film, which was just a shittier version of the first Star Wars film. Remember that when the first of the new trilogy was released, no one was really very angry, because it was just the same thing as the first film. It was only when the second one was released, with psycho Luke, feminist overdrive, race mixing, and a disastrous retcon campaign that fans were like “wait, what even is this?”

Just so: after the initial black campaign launched by Obama, and then running throughout the first Trump years, people were just like: “Oh okay, this is just the same thing as the blacks did in the 1960s. I remember this.”

In 2020, it got weird, but only because they started rioting super hardcore, and the police refused to stop the riots. Donald Trump refused to use federal force to stop the riots. So they were just allowed to completely burn everything and call for the police to be abolished. So in some sense it was new, but only in the severity. There was no new learning experience, unless someone didn’t know how violent blacks are, in which case they would have learned that blacks are really, really violent.

Point being: anyone who says “we now have a new understanding of the plight of blacks and how that relates to the Founding documents because we watched blacks burn down cities” is lying. (Unless they were to say “oh okay, so this is why the Founding Fathers didn’t consider blacks to be human” – but that is not what NPR is saying.)

Claiming that “now that the blacks rioted so hard, it’s time to hate America” is just gibberish, and an excuse for Jews to push an existing hatred of America.

Remember: up until this point, all of these Jews and Democrats were claiming that THEY are the true representatives of the “founding ideas” of America, and that “racists” are “anti-American.”

“Created Equal”

I agree that “all men are created equal” is an unfortunate line, given the way things developed, but we must remember that the Declaration was written before even the industrial revolution and the advent of the locomotive. So there is no way the Founding Fathers could have predicted that things would develop as they have developed.

The actual context had nothing to do with modern ideas, at all, and it cannot fit into any modern conception of “equality.” The context of the statement was made against the idea of an aristocracy based on birth, where kings and nobles existed outside of the rule of law.

For further context: kings and nobles were supposed to be under the law since the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215 AD, but they just weren’t in practice at the time that the declaration was signed. Basically, you would have to go back and look at the English Civil War – funded by the Jews from Amsterdam – to understand the roots of what the Founding Fathers were complaining about, but just understand: what they were saying is that all men should have equal status under the law.

Also, women are not men (obviously) and blacks were considered 3/5ths of a man. Indian savages were just Indian savages. The people writing this document had no idea, and no way of conceiving, that women, blacks and Indians would at some point in the future be considered equal with white men. It just didn’t fit into their reality tunnel, so they never would have thought to say “obviously, we mean white men.”

However, of course, we have after the Declaration a history of court rulings which show that blacks were not considered men (3/5ths) and even that Chinese, some of whom have white skin, were not considered “men,” because “men” exclusively meant “white European man.”

There is no “hypocrisy” – at all. What there is: a difference in terminology.

This is like if in the year 2293, Captain Kirk went and found a book about sailing ships written in 1480 that described all the different kinds of sailing ships and then said “this book is filled with flaws and deeply ingrained hypocrisies, as it doesn’t even mention spaceships at all.”

(Editor’s Note: Best analogy yet – Hoax Watch is moving from strength to strength.)

Jefferson’s First Draft

Thomas Jefferson owned slaves, but he was against the practice. Maybe that is some kind of hypocrisy, I guess – but it isn’t present in the document, because it was edited out.

But that kind of hypocrisy always exists among intellectuals who are forced to live practically in a normal society. The only philosopher I’m aware of who was not a hypocrite was Ted Kaczynski, as he actually did live in the woods, as he thought everyone should. However, you could also say Ted was a hypocrite, as he used modern science to build his bombs, and used the post office to send them. Then he demanded his manifesto (full text) be published in a modern newspaper.

Anyway: I’m no Jefferson or Kaczynski (especially not the latter, FBI), but I am against cellphones and WiFi, and think that all modern electronics should be wired for the sake of maintaining the social order, yet I’ve used cellphones and WiFi on and off as a practical matter, because I need them for my work. I argue for banning WiFi while connected to WiFi.

That’s not anywhere as bad as Candace Owens and Ben Shapiro, who are complaining about censoring on Facebook while paying them millions in advertisement money.

Candace Owens has given Facebook more than $1 million, Ben Shapiro has given Facebook almost $3 million. pic.twitter.com/AiRIHvB1zG

— The Rock (@TheRockthereal1) July 1, 2021

However: even that hypocrisy I understand. Facebook is the number one place to promote media on the internet. I can’t say that if I was allowed on Facebook, I wouldn’t also be paying them for ads (I am actually pretty sure I would be).

Point being: Jefferson was, as a philosopher, promoting an ideal – he wanted to send these blacks back to Africa, as he was able to see that in the long run, this was going to lead nowhere good. However, he was also a Southern aristocrat, and owning slaves was part of the normal society he was living in, so he had to own slaves. If he had said “I’m not going to use slaves on my plantations because I’m morally opposed to this,” he would have been driven out of business by competitors that were using slaves. This would then make him less powerful and successful, and therefore less capable of arguing for his philosophical points against slavery, just as if Candace Owens refused to buy Facebook ads, she would have fewer people hearing her as she complained about Facebook censorship.

So: there is a very clear and generally socially acceptable context for the Jefferson slave ownership hypocrisy, which anyone who is not arguing in good faith is able to grasp.

But again: that wasn’t even included in the Declaration, so it is not relevant to the NPR attack on our nation.

America=White Christians

Longtime readers will remember the “optics wars,” where I argued, alongside Ricky Vaughn and eventually the Optics Lord Nick Fuentes, that the Jews would eventually attack all of the symbols of America as “white supremacy,” which would lead to massive polarization of American society, which would mean that all boomer-type conservatives would eventually have to accept that no, American isn’t “an idea,” it is a people – white people.

That has now happened. The Jews are now openly saying that all of the symbols of America are evil, that America is white supremacy, that America has to be abolished.

We are getting to the point where the only defenders of America will be white nationalists, and at that point, America will be a de facto white nationalist country, which is occupied by forces that are both anti-American and anti-white.

Related: The New York Times Admits the American Flag is a Symbol of the Right

In 2017, I said that very soon, Jews would start saying “America is for white people only” and that the right-wing should be saying “yes, exactly.”

All of these attacks on the 4th of July from the Jews prove that we are already there. It will of course intensify over the next year, with Democrats calling for the American flag to be taken down and replaced with something else.

It’s all part of the plan.

When white nationalists are the only ones holding the American flag, all of these boomers will have to choose whether to spit on the flag in the name of “oh I just want to be like MLK and not see race” or side with white nationalists against the Jewish agenda.

At that point, the battle lines will be drawn, and we will all know exactly where we stand.

President Trump declined to condemn the actions of the suspected 17-year-old shooter of 3 protesters against police brutality in Kenosha — claiming, without evidence, that it appeared the gunman was acting in self-defense.https://t.co/a7LnGABckN

— NPR (@NPR) September 1, 2020

“Without evidence” is not intended to be a factual claim indicating that the evidence doesn’t exist.

It’s just a kind of catchphrase that’s tacked on after Donald Trump is quoted.

Fox News:

NPR was strongly criticized Tuesday after it claimed that President Trump had “no evidence” that Kyle Rittenhouse, the 17-year-old who shot three protesters in Kenosha, Wis. last week, acted out of self-defense.

“You saw the same tape as I saw,” Trump said during a White House press briefing on Monday. “He was trying to get away from them, I guess, it looks like. And he fell, and then they very violently attacked him, and it was something that we’re looking at right now, and it’s under investigation, but I guess he was in very big trouble. He probably would have been killed but it’s under investigation.”

NPR responded on Tuesday by tweeting: “President Trump declined to condemn the actions of the suspected 17-year-old shooter of 3 [sic] protesters against police brutality in Kenosha — claiming, without evidence, that it appeared the gunman was acting in self-defense.”

Obviously, the footage shows definitively that Kyle was acting in self-defense, and the footage, typically, would be considered “evidence.”

Did you know that NPR is taxpayer-funded?

Does that make sense?

Kyle spoke from county jail this week.

He’s in good spirits.

KYLE RITTENHOUSE SPEAKS!!!!!! THIS MUST BE THE TWEET HEARD ‘ROUND THE WORLD!!!!!! RETWEET AND DONATE TO THE #FIGHTBACK FOUNDATION RIGHT NOW!!!!! #PaulRevere ⁦@LLinWood⁩ ⁦@realDonaldTrump⁩ ⁦@TuckerCarlson⁩ ⁦@michellemalkin⁩ ⁦@PressSec⁩ pic.twitter.com/fOCzeLGkcm

— John Pierce (@CaliKidJMP) September 1, 2020

Twitter is just trying to find any little place where they can make things more Orwellian.

POLITICO:

Twitter will start labeling the accounts of media outlets affiliated with the governments of countries on the U.N. National Security Council, it announced Thursday.

The new labels won’t apply to all media outlets that receive government funding — only “outlets where the state exercises control over editorial content through financial resources, direct or indirect political pressures, and/or control over production and distribution,” according to Twitter’s blog post announcing the change.

The labels will go on the accounts for China Daily, Russia Today, Sputnik and other media outlets, a Twitter spokesperson said. But not Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, two media outlets funded by the U.S. government, or NPR and the BBC. The blog post described NPR and the BBC as “state-financed media organizations with editorial independence.”

Obviously, the editors of RT or China Daily would claim they have editorial independence, in the same way that the editors of NPR and the BBC claim to have editorial independence. That is to say, “state funding” is an objective measure, whereas “editorial independence” simply is not. At all.

Many people question the editorial independence of Washington Post, given that they are owned by Jeff Bezos, and tend to cover Amazon favorably. In fact, the editorial independence of every media outlet tends to be questioned, even if they do not have a direct and public conflict of interest. The editorial independence of the Daily Stormer has been questioned; for example, given that we have ostensibly reported favorably on certain countries, we have been accused of receiving money from these countries. We have never received money from any country or any individual who has ever attempted to change the direction of this publication, but the fact is, that can’t ever be proved, so it becomes a stupid discussion.

All of this is to say: information has to be taken at face value, and all information should be examined through a critical lens by adult readers. The social media companies are now dealing with people as though they are children, incapable of any kind of critical analysis whatsoever. I don’t know if people are or are not capable of critical analysis, but I do know that the primary, foundational assumption of a universal suffrage democracy is that every adult member of society is capable of rational analysis and critical decision-making. That’s the most basic claim of this system, as it justifies allowing them to vote and determine who runs the government.

By undermining the ability of people to make rational and informed decisions, Twitter is undermining the concept of universal suffrage democracy itself. Of course, they don’t care, because our rulers do not actually believe in anything other than power. They profess various ideologies at different times, but only use these ideologies to push their agenda that exists totally independently from the ideologies.

The right needs to start doing the same. We need to be going after power. There was nothing more enraging than watching right-wing shills say that Trump shouldn’t regulate social media because it would “expand government control.” I’ve already given my full analysis of that, so I won’t go into it here, but the fact of reality is this: the right chasing ideological spooks while the left continues to act purely pragmatically is why we are losing. That is the most basic of all reasons we are losing.

Remember that the Trump Administration started off on a failure because John McCain sabotaged the vote to repeal Obamacare. That set the stage for everything else.

It was open sabotage by McCain, of course, and anyone who knew anything knew that, and yet, none in the media or in the party would call him a saboteur or an anti-American traitor because he claimed to be acting under loyalty to an ideological spook. Loyalty to ideological spooks is considered on the right to be respectable and good, even though it is purely destructive, and has zero upsides.

We should take note of the fact that Twitter is allegedly acting in the name of democracy while undermining what is literally the single most important foundational principle of democracy when we consider the fact that we allow our own representatives to act out of alleged loyalty to ideological spooks.

The far-right is even more obsessed with ideological spooks than the mainstream conservative right, frankly. These people are the literal Spook Patrol.

We have an agenda that is a real agenda based on real world policies we want to enact. The process of enacting this agenda should not and cannot be laden with spooks. A spook-laden agenda cannot ever be realized.

Here is our full interview with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. It's worth a listen. https://t.co/3BQh3Q7lWV

— Mary Louise Kelly (@NPRKelly) January 24, 2020

Mike Pompeo is totally incapable of controlling what he puts in his mouth, as anyone who looks at him can see.

Is it any surprise that he is also incapable of controlling his emotions?

You must understand: fat people will do anything.

Washington Post:

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo launched into a profanity-laced rant against an NPR reporter after an interview, the news organization says, apparently frustrated by questions he had been asked about Ukraine and former ambassador Marie Yovanovitch.

During an interview with NPR’s Mary Louise Kelly that aired Friday, Pompeo refused to say whether he owed an apology to Yovanovitch, whose firing has featured prominently in President Trump’s impeachment inquiry. An aide ended the interview after Kelly pressed Pompeo for a response.

Kelly recounted what happened next in a report that accompanied her interview. She said a staffer brought her to Pompeo’s private sitting room, where he was waiting for her. Even though she was not allowed to bring her recording equipment into the room, she said there was no request that she keep the exchange off the record, and she would not have agreed to a conversation if it was off the record.

“He shouted at me for about the same amount of time as the interview itself had lasted,” Kelly reported.

“He asked me, ‘Do you think Americans care about Ukraine?’ ” she continued. “He used the ‘F word’ in that sentence and many others. He asked if I could find Ukraine on a map. I said yes; he called out for his aides to bring him a map of the world with no writing, no countries marked. I pointed to Ukraine; he put the map away. He said, ‘People will hear about this.’ “

HAHA!

That’s crazy that he has a map ready to use against journalists. That’s like some slapstick comedy behavior.

He’s also saying that Americans don’t care about the Ukraine, which is funny, because the entire policy he pushes with regards to the Ukraine is that Americans are extremely concerned about them having a good democracy with many different human rights.

Kelly said Pompeo was not “not happy to have been questioned about Ukraine,” though during the recorded interview, she told Pompeo she cleared the topics of Ukraine and Iran with his aides beforehand.

In a statement released early Saturday, Pompeo confirmed that a conversation had taken place after the interview. But he accused Kelly of having “lied to me, twice,” first in setting up the terms of the interview and then again in agreeing to keeping the “post-interview conversation” off the record.

“It is shameful that this reporter chose to violate the basic rules of journalism and decency,” the secretary said. “This is another example of how unhinged the media has become in its quest to hurt President Trump and this Administration. It is no wonder that the American people distrust many in the media when they so consistently demonstrate their agenda and their absence of integrity.”

The statement ended with a vague, unexplained assertion – “It is worth noting that Bangladesh is NOT Ukraine” – that seemed to imply that Kelly, who holds a master’s degree in European studies from Cambridge University, got her geography wrong.

Yeah, I bet she did.

Many Americans think that Iran is in Arkansas or Missouri or somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean, on an island.

Or maybe they think it’s an underwater base?

Like the Hall of Doom?

Journalists are some of the lowest IQ people in the country – these people literally want to be novelists – so I would expect that the average journalist knows less about the world than the average random person.

And women in general are dumber than a sack of bricks. They literally think about nothing other than having sex with black men and where they can take their next public poop.

So, I don’t have a dog in a cat fight between Fat Mike the Neocon and some dumb bitch, but you would certainly hope that members of the president’s cabinet know better than to sink to the level of a filthy journalist slut and engage her in a cat fight.

It is a shame on the face of America to have high level officials going down that low.

I wish we could do a Stormer game and see how many people can identify the Ukraine and Iran on maps. I think you guys would score well. But if we do an online test, it defeats the purpose, as people can cheat.

Dear Alex DiBranco: As the self-appointed spiritual successor to Elliot Rodger, I can tell you for a fact that Elliot would not kiss you. You are too damn ugly. Literally for your whole life, only niggers will be willing to fuck you or touch you at all. No wonder you’re trying to destroy the incel movement. 

I don’t know when it became acceptable in ostensibly intellectual circles to talk about evil and fighting evil. What I do know is that when 911 happened, George W. Bush and his people referred to the Moslems as “evil” and were severely rebuked by academia and ostensible intellectuals.

What I also know is that it is now routine to refer to white people as “evil” within academia, including the Ph.D. program at Yale.

There is a really gay article up on NPR entitled “‘It Gets To You.’ Extremism Researchers Confront The Unseen Toll Of Their Work.” It starts off talking about how ISIS researchers who watch ISIS videos are a bunch of gay faggot pussies who become emotionally unstable from watching videos on the internet. Then it starts talking about “white extremists” and how people develop psychological problems from reading white nationalist materials.

It ends with literally this:

Alex DiBranco, a Ph.D. candidate at Yale University whose research topics include the misogynistic incel movement, said she was forced to come up with her own coping mechanisms because mental health resources for students are scarce or hard to access. For example, she addressed the isolation of her work by moving to California, where she’s part of a cohort of researchers looking at similar ideologies.

And, she said, she tries to limit her time in front of screeds that refer to women as subhuman.

“I just can’t sit for an eight-hour workday and read misogynist rhetoric nonstop,” DiBranco said. “So I have a little bit of a system for giving myself a break after each really appalling thing that I read.”

Her system: regular breaks to go fight some bad guys in a video game. DiBranco said it’s about escapism, a pick-me-up in a field that’s relentlessly bleak.

“You’re the good guys,” she said. “You feel accomplished — you finish quests, you’re defeating evil.”

So I mean, 20 years ago you got berated for saying that it was “evil” to fly planes into buildings.

Now it’s standard in the highest levels of academia to call men evil for saying mean things about women on the internet.

You could no doubt go into a lot of different factors that caused this change in attitude. Part of it is probably just the number of women in academia. There are no doubt more now than there were in 2001, and women are more likely to use childlike terms such as “evil” because they have the minds of children.

But the ultimate fact is simply that society is devolving, rapidly, and we are moving into government by witch hunt. So the language and imagery of the witch hunt culture is taking over the lexicon.

Seriously.

My own enemies – the Jews – are an ancient satanic cult that literally engages in human sacrifice, child molestation and cannibalism. And I use scientific terminology to describe them: inbred genetic waste, subhuman, inherited psychopathy. I rarely use “evil,” and if I do, I’m being consciously hyperbolic.

Alex DiBranco, the ugly bitch who hates men and is a Ph.D. candidate at Yale, uses the term with a completely straight face.

She is fighting evil.

Like in a video game.

Incel boners are no joke, as the world shall soon learn – when the raping gets started. 

A mutant freak named Leah Donnella – a half kike Negroid – has written an article for NPR theorizing that the racial hatreds in America will end when old people die.

Look at this sick nig-kike.

The whole Jew face is evident even when half nig, smdh.

Those Jew genes are strong, huh? Not even the genes of the Negroid can hide them!

WOW!

You can go read the article. I’m not going to quote from it. The headline pretty much says it all.

The nig-kike’s entire premise – a meme which has been spread by other Jews and blacks, including the nasty old black bitch Oprah – is that with each generation, people are becoming less and less racist, and that as time progresses, racism will head down towards zero.

Hilariously, this is the opposite of what we are seeing happen.

In fact, it is anti-racism that is on the decline, and we will see a huge drop-off of anti-racism when these self-absorbed, feel-goody, reality-denying boom-cucks die out.

The younger generation is on the up and up.

Racism is rising.

We are reverting to our natural state as white men.

Bitch-slapping, nigger-hating conquerors.

We are going to bring down the Jew-feminist system and reconquer the planet.