Hey yo – based?

Violence?

Cool?

I denounce all forms of violence, but people who support violence, are they cool?

Based? 

Breitbart:

A survey conducted by the British polling firm WeThink has painted a bleak picture for the future of the polity as an apparent breakdown in the trust of institutions to address the demands of the public has seemingly coincided with increasing willingness to back violent alternatives.

The poll, which surveyed 1,278 people between August 7th and 8th, during the height of the recent anti-mass migration riots that broke out across the UK, found that 39 per cent of respondents agreed with the statement: “When it comes to the refugee problem, violence is sometimes the only means that citizens have to get the attention of British politicians.”

That’s actually more than 1 in 3.

This sort of widespread support

Additionally, 34 per cent said that they felt attacks on refugee accommodations are “sometimes necessary to make it clear to politicians that we have a refugee problem,” while 32 per cent agreed with the notion that hostility towards refugees themselves is sometimes justified, even if such hostility ends in violence.

The survey also found that 36 per cent felt that “xenophobic acts of violence are defensible if they result in fewer refugees being settled in your town.”

Now that is hardcore.

Is this real? 

The survey from WeThink found that 54 per cent of those surveyed felt that the immigration policies from Westminster were the main cause of the riots. The survey firm is a new entrant in the British polling industry, but it is a member of the UK’s polling industry council and has recently collaborated on large-scale surveys for left-establishment press outlets.

As widely noted, and no less than by a report from the BBC, the Labour government has so far refrained from publicly discussing the “underlying causes” of the riots for fear that it would be “misinterpreted as suggesting some of the unrest was justified.” 

Starmer’s stance towards the riots has seen widespread pushback from across the political divide. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage accused the prime minister of “completely” failing to understand the mood of the nation about the “societal breakdown” caused by decades of mass migration policies from both the Labour and Conservative parties.

As Breitbart London previously reported: “Parties or causes promoting the reduction of immigration came first in national elections in 2009, 2010, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, and twice in 2019, without those promises ever coming remotely close to being fulfilled.”

Well, what are you gonna do?

It’s a democracy and the values of who we are.

There is… no petition of grievances.

Only the Russians want us to be able to petition grievances, because they hate gays.

All I know is this: the music they constantly play says nothing to me about my life.

Nothing.

Nigel Farage sucks ass and is a gay faggot.

He is a well-known nigger-lover and a bitch who does nothing but whine all the time like a baby someone just kicked across the room.

Nonetheless, they took his bank, just because he was disagreeing a tiny bit with the people in charge.

The Guardian:

Nigel Farage has said that the newly installed boss of Coutts has offered to keep his accounts there open, reversing a decision that triggered a scandal and the resignation of the private bank’s previous chief executive.

The former Ukip leader said he welcomed the offer but was still taking legal action against NatWest, which owns Coutts, demanding compensation, a full apology and a face-to-face meeting with the banking group’s bosses.

Peter Flavel resigned as Coutts chief executive last Thursday, less than two days after the NatWest boss, Alison Rose, also stepped down over her role in the row. Flavel has been replaced by Mohammed Syed.

“The new CEO of Coutts … has written to me to say I can keep both my personal and my business accounts, and that’s good, and I thank him for it,” Farage said on GB News on Monday night.

“But enormous harm has been done to me over the course of the last few months … It has taken up a huge amount of my time and it has cost me, so far, quite a lot of money in legal fees. So I have today sent a legal litigation letter to Coutts, where I want some full apologies, I want some compensation for my cost.

“But more important than all of that, I want a face-to-face meeting with the bank’s bosses. I want to find out how many other people in Coutts or NatWest have had accounts closed because of their political opinions. And I want to make sure this never happens to anybody else ever again.”

Farage obtained documents from Coutts showing that while he had been below the bank’s “commercial criteria” for some time – referring to its requirement to hold £1m in investments or loans, or £3m in savings – the decision to shut his accounts was also based on concerns that his “xenophobic, chauvinistic and racist views” posed a risk to its reputation.

Banks are not allowed to shut accounts or deny services because of customers’ political views or beliefs.

Farage did not clarify whether he had accepted Coutts’s offer to keep his account open. NatWest Group said it could not comment on individual customers.

His comments came hours after the City regulator urged NatWest shareholders, including the UK government, to “choose stability”, suggesting they should resist calls for the group’s chair, Howard Davies, to resign over the ballooning scandal linked to Farage’s accounts.

NatWest is still reeling from Rose’s shock resignation, after late-night interventions by Downing Street last week. It came after she admitted discussing Farage’s account closure with a BBC journalist.

Farage wants more heads to roll at NatWest – which is still 38.5% government-owned after its 2008 state bailout – but on Monday the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) called for calm.

“The economic secretary to the Treasury [Andrew Griffith] just last week mentioned that he had confidence in Howard Davies, the current chair,” the FCA’s director for consumer matters and competition, Sheldon Mills, said. “I agree with his view that it’s important to have stability at NatWest and that having a chair remain in place will help support that.”

When asked whether the FCA was officially backing Davies, Mills said: “It’s the FCA’s position that ultimately that’s a decision for the board, a decision for that institution, and its shareholders.

“We urge those shareholders and the board to achieve stability within that institution.

“What we are interested in is that banks and the banking system is stable and that consumers have trust and confidence in it. And what we will continue to do, as we have done in the past few weeks, is to support banks and boards in getting to the right decisions or solutions in relation to that.”

I support him or whatever.

Obviously, if he beats the bank, that’s a good thing.

No one will be upset by that.

Probably, the bank will just be ordered to give him like, $2,000.

From what I’ve seen of him recently, he could probably use the money.

Farage had previously been refused by every other bank he wanted to open an account with

Nigel Farage was never really “far-right.”

I remember this nigga saying he wanted more black immigration to offset Polish immigration.

People have been getting banned from banks since 2017 (Andrew Anglin), and this guy never did shit.

Obviously, I don’t support him having his bank account taken…. but it’s also hard to really care that much.

Breitbart:

Natwest chief executive Dame Alison Rose apologises for “deeply inappropriate comments” about Nigel Farage in now-public internal bank documents which led to him being debanked, but stopped short of actually changing their decision.

Dame Alison Rose said she wanted to “apologise for the deeply inappropriate comments about yourself made in the now published papers prepared for the Wealth Committee. I would like to make it clear that they do not reflect the view of the bank” on Thursday, weeks into a growing scandal over debanking in the United Kingdom.

Alison Rose

Nigel Farage revealed the bank he has been a customer of for both his personal and business accounts for decades had suddenly and arbitrarily informed him that they would be closing his account last month. He attempted to open accounts at nine other UK banks, all of which turned him down, he said.

While there were claims the sudden debanking of the Brexit leader were not a political act — including an apparent effort to discredit Mr Farage’s claims by the banking house and the BBC — this week Farage published internal bank documents appearing to settle for good that the act was overwhelmingly political.

Among the charges laid against the politician by Coutts bank, is part of the Royal Bank of Scotland and Natwest group that was bailed out by the British taxpayer at colossal expense in 2008 and remains to this day partially state-owned, was that Mr Farage is close to Donald Trump and tennis player Novak Djokovic, and once retweeted a joke by comedian Ricky Gervais.

Among the claims made about Mr Farage apologised for today include the allegation that he is “xenophobic and racist”, “distasteful and [appears] increasingly out of touch with wider society”, and is “at odds with our position as an inclusive organisation”. The British government is allegedly responding to the controversy over the debanking by changing the licences under which banks operate, and will require them to protect freedom of speech in future.

I’m sure this’ll work

While the apology appears at first to wish to make amends, it is nevertheless clear that the Natwest boss is making clear nothing changes.

Paradoxically, bank boss Rose claimed the lengthy internal bank document on which it made the decision to debank Mr Farage did not actually “reflect the view of the bank”. This is the latest instance of apparent say-one-thing-do-another from the bank, which in recent days has included briefing against Mr Farage to the BBC one moment and then hiding behind “client confidentiality” the next.

Dame Alison also made an offer of a NatWest account to Mr Farage, something which has been on the table since Farage first revealed the debanking move against him. Yet as he has made clear this is an offer for a personal account only — still leaving the Brexit leader with no access to a business account at this or any other UK bank — so the situation is far from resolved.

Frankly, he’s lucky to be able to have a personal bank account, which is more than most of us get.

The guy doesn’t do anything anyway. He acted like he wanted to be Prime Minister, then Brexit happened, and he just dipped out.

Then he came back and then left again.

He’s not really a useful person.

Still, he’s an extremely high profile person to be totally banned from banking.

Why should he be able to use a bank account after he said those things that people disagreed with?

No one should be allowed to say things that others disagree with.

That’s a direct attack on our values.

Metro:

Ministers have rallied around former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage after private bank Coutts closed his account.

The company had reportedly decided that the politician’s views do ‘not align with our values’.

Energy Security Secretary Grant Shapps fumed the decision was ‘absolutely disgraceful’, while Treasury minister Andrew Griffith added it raised ‘serious concern’.

Eurosceptic Mr Farage has handed the Mail Online 40 pages of documents he obtained after making a subject access request to Coutts after its decision to shut his account.

According to the report, the bank’s dossier cited his retweet of a Ricky Gervais joke about trans women and his friendship with tennis player Novak Djokovic, who was against being vaccinated against Covid, to flag concerns Mr Farage is ‘xenophobic and racist’.

Mr Farage said his experience has left him fearing the UK is moving towards a ‘Chinese-style social credit system’ where only those with ‘acceptable views’ can participate in society.

It comes as ministers refused to rule out introducing legislation to crackdown on banks closing accounts due to a customer’s political views.

Mr Shapps told Sky News the Financial Conduct Authority, the sector watchdog, ‘does need to do more on this’.

Asked if the law should be changed, he said: ‘Maybe. We will do whatever is required, but in the first place the Financial Conduct Authority needs to get a grip of this.’

The Cabinet minister added: ‘I don’t have to agree with everything Nigel Farage says to recognise that free speech is a very important part of our domestic life.

‘People shouldn’t have their bank accounts closed because of their political or any other view.’

Yeah, well.

Tell that to all those people who had their bank accounts closed for talking about the Jews.

Farage was silent when that was happening. Then he was silent when this was happening to Tommy Robinson, who didn’t even say anything about the Jews.

So, I mean. I don’t think this should be happening to Farage.

But on a personal level – sorry, I’ve got no sympathy.

All of these people, from Alex Jones to Charlie Kirk, thought they could get away with having free speech while the “far right” was being banned.

I don’t know how, after all these decades, conservatives still cannot grasp “the slippery slope.”

It’s very simple, and it is slipping and sliding everywhere, all the time.

Get with it, retards.

The slippery slope is real, and it is slippery as a mf.

Farage isn’t the only one

Whenever you ask private companies why they are crushing white people and Christians, they generally respond by saying “we are neutral, actually.”

After the Twitter Files, we can now just assume that the governments of the West are pressuring the private sector on everything, constantly.

Daily Mail:

A high street bank has stopped a group of gender-critical parents from opening an account because of their views.

Metro Bank reportedly denied a request to create a business account for Our Duty, a 2,000-strong group of parents who think it is harmful for transgender kids to transition medically.

Our Duty founder Keith Jordan claimed a bank manager told them they were blocked because ‘the content of your website conflicts with the culture and ideas we are pushing’.

Keith Jordan appears to have a very personal reason to do this

Metro is the seventh largest bank in Britain and boasts 2.5 million customers.

Just last month it joined controversial charity Stonewall’s Diversity Champion scheme.

It came as MailOnline revealed how one of Britain’s equalities leaders, a father’s rights charity and a former UKIP councillor have all had their accounts shut.

Former teacher and businessman Mr Jordan told The Telegraph the Metro bank manager said: ‘The bank has staff networks for diversity and inclusion including for LGBTQ staff’.

The same manager also said an existing community account violated guidelines that stopped groups being linked to or influencing ‘political policies or legislations’ as it did not allow donation from groups that were not registered charities.

The bank told him via email that his application was stopped after an ‘in-depth review’.

Yesterday, Nigel Farage lashed out at Coutts for closing his accounts as he branded the private bank ‘very, very dishonest’.

The ex-Brexit Party leader bristled at claims he is not wealthy enough for an account at the 327-year-old institution, whose clients include the Royal Family.

He also revealed he has now been blocked from holding an account with nine other banks after being classed as a ‘politically exposed person (PEP)’.

Mr Farage is currently waging a furious fightback against what he claims is ‘serious political persecution’ by British banks who are ‘trying to force me out of the UK’.

The 59-year-old, previously the leader of UKIP, has suggested the action is due to his involvement in the Brexit referendum and a ‘prejudice’ held against him.

He has claimed life in Britain could become ‘unlivable’ for him and he might be forced to relocate abroad.

The row has seen Tory MPs express concerns about a ‘chilling effect’ on free speech.

The House of Commons has also heard how many others have had their ‘lives wrecked’ by the impact of banking rules relating to PEPs.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said: ‘The Chancellor has been very clear about this and spoken to the regulator.

‘Obviously, we have to respect people’s right to free speech and that should not be an excuse to close anyone’s account and that’s not what we would expect.’

Metro Bank said it ‘is and will remain politically neutral’.

Rishi – who I was never ready for – comes out and says things on virtually every issue, but he never does anything, ever, except raise taxes and send money to the Ukraine.

Everybody’s losing their bank accounts in the UK these days

But by claiming “globalist” means “Jew,” are not Jews admitting to being globalists?

Do you see the way this whole thing moved from “you can’t accuse the Jews of doing the things they’re actually doing” to “everything the Jews do is good because they are Jews so you can’t criticize any of it”?

Breitbart:

A debate has emerged in Britain over the term ‘globalist’, with elements of the legacy media and social media arguing that using the word to describe the political ideology of preferring super state over state is actually a racist term against Jewish people.

Following what many, such as Brexit leader Nigel Fage, have described as a “globalist coup” to install former Goldman Sachs banker and World Economic Forum (WEF) acolyte Rishi Sunak as prime minister, left-wing figures have attempted to make the very term “globalist” an off-limits slur, claiming that it is antisemitic.

Last week, Nigel Farage tweeted: “Jeremy Hunt is now running the country. This is a globalist coup.” Mr Farage went on to make similar comments following the installation of Grant Shapps as Home Secretary.

The statements were condemned by Jewish groups, despite the fact that Mr Hunt is not Jewish but rather a member of the Church of England. Mr Shapps comes from a Jewish family.

Criticising the use of the term, Marie van der Zyl, the president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, said: “Antisemitism experts such as the Anti Defamation League identify ‘globalist’ as a common antisemitic trope based on conspiracy theories about international Jewish power. Politicians should avoid using the term, particularly when referring specifically to Jewish individuals.”

The linguistic dispute came to a head on Sunday, when a caller to the LBC radio station echoed Mr Farage’s sentiments in describing Sunak as a “globalist” who “doesn’t seem to love England”.

For this remark, LBC host Sangita Myska, formerly of the BBC, chastised the caller, saying: “As we continue this conversation, please don’t use the phrase globalist again because many of my Jewish listeners will find that incredibly offensive because it has also been used, at times, as a racist put down to the Jewish community.”

“That’s not true,” the listener shot back. “If I meant Jewish, I’d say Jewish.”

Words being banned by mainstream media, this is not good. https://t.co/ZkAG8zhwl8

— Nigel Farage (@Nigel_Farage) October 24, 2022

Commenting on the exchange, Mr Farage, who was previously a host for LBC, lamented: “Words being banned by mainstream media, this is not good”.

Mr Farage also shared the Oxford English Dictionary’s definition of globalism, which states: “The belief that events in one country affect those in all other countries, and that economic and foreign policy should benefit the world as a whole instead of individual countries.”

Anglican deacon and GB News host Calvin Robinson also took aim at language policing from the media, writing on social media: “Be wary of anyone who hears ‘globalist’ and thinks ‘THE JEWS!’

“As ever, they are the very thing they accuse us of. A globalist is a politician who operates on an international perspective, rather than a local/national perspective. It’s only a slur in the mind of antisemitics.”

This is obviously bullshit.

The anti-globalisation movement and protests of the 1990s were categorically green and anti-capitalist.

Those movements found their peace (or price) with globalisation.

Now, nearly a third a century later, a historical smear is invented. https://t.co/HYxhxM7sQX

— Ben Pile (@clim8resistance) October 25, 2022

Political commentator and Spiked! columnist, Ben Pile noted that the origins of the anti-globalist movement were left-wing in nature, highlighting the protests against the World Trade Organization (WTO) such as the anti-capitalist ‘Battle of Seattle’ in 1999 in which black bloc anarchists rampaged through the American city, smashing businesses along their way. It has been estimated that Seattle businesses lost some $20 million in lost sales and property damage during the protests.

The Jews have a big problem now.

Twitter is going live.

We’re going to see who the globalists are. Actually, we don’t need to see that because they already admitted that part. But we’re going to see what else they’re doing – and we’re going to see it quickly.

Greenblatt – hit me up, bro. I’ve got a few questions about the Jew people and their actions. You can just explain it to me on Twitter. I just want to understand what exactly it is that you’re up to.

BASED!

Nigel, you were supposed to be the chosen one!

Breitbart:

Brexit firebrand Nigel Farage has said that the Conservative Party is “doomed” to be ousted next election unless “by some miracle” Kemi Badenoch becomes Prime Minister.

Kemi Badenoch becoming the next Prime Minister appears to be the Conservative Party’s only hope at winning the next general election, Brexit firebrand Nigel Farage has argued.

Out of the four remaining candidates left in contention for the UK’s top political job, Badenoch — who has made a name for herself via denouncing critical race theory and arguing for a return to conservative principles — now has the least votes of Conservative colleagues in parliament to stay in the race, with more left-leaning or centrist-globalist options of Liz Truss, Rishi Sunak and Penny Mordaunt all polling higher in parliament.

Should Badenoch be kicked from the race, the Conservative Party will be in very deep trouble, Farage has argued, with the seasoned populist saying that the rest of the pack are simply not patriotic enough to win over voters in the “red wall” battleground constituencies.

“The Conservative Party are in more trouble than any of them realize,” Farage said in a video published on Monday, before lambasting Penny Mordaunt for her pro-trans stance, Rishi Sunak for being a “great globalist” who will be unable to stand up to China, and Liz Truss for having been an ardent Remainer and Liberal Democrat politician in the past, as well as allegedly being the current candidate of choice for billionaires who want a weak leader that will represent their interests.

“[Leftist Labour leader Keir] Starmer may be useless, but I have a feeling right now whatever happens over the course of the next few weeks the Conservative Party prospects for the next election are completely and utterly doomed unless something radical appears,” he continued. “Unless by some miracle Badenoch wins I think for conservative voters these are very depressing days.”

Having championed a move away from left-wing positions on Critical Race Theory and the British Empire being a complete unabashed evil, Badenoch has generated a great deal of grassroots support from those on the right in Britain.

Seemingly as a result of this, the candidate — who has family roots in Nigeria — has managed to do well in general polling for all Conservative Party members, with it now being expected that Badenoch would beat any rival to become Prime Minister should she make it to the final two.

Badenoch also appears to be tempting back some who have left the party in the past, with one big money ex-donor saying that he would consider rejoining the party should the outsider candidate triumph over her rivals

I’m so sick of right-wingers pandering to niggers and women.

“Far right leader shills for nigger woman” is truly the worst.

I don’t even hate niggers, or think niggers should be lynched, or pushed into the sea, or whatever.

I do hate women, actually. Nothing really to add there.

But blacks, generally, it’s like – okay, whatever. Whatever. Whatever.

I don’t know why black people are in Britain. In America, I’m not against Based Black Guys.

But here’s the thing: the right has to be for tradition, or what is it? And European tradition is not black. It doesn’t really matter how based a black person is, the leaders of European countries should be white, and the right should always push for whiteness as the defining characteristic of Europeaness.

And frankly, the right should be actively pushing for fewer brown people. I don’t know how more gently to say that. We don’t need more brown people, we need less brown people, and the very last thing we need is brown people in charge.

No, no – I would rather have a brown man than a brown woman. Actually, I would probably rather have a brown man than a white woman.

But these are not the conversations we should be having.

God help us all

Outside of the obvious elections, the lockdown is the only single issue that anyone should really be talking about.

No other political issue matters anymore, because all politics are now taking place under this lockdown. The lockdown allows for the elite to manipulate any political issue they want to manipulate, as it gives them this completely unprecedented level of control.

Nigel Farage gets it.

Sydney Morning Herald:

Nigel Farage, the polarising driving force behind Brexit, is moving to rebrand his political movement to become the voice of growing anti-lockdown sentiment in Britain.

In a tactic that threatens to inflame tensions inside the government, Farage has sought Electoral Commission permission to change the name of the Brexit Party to Reform UK. Its main aim will be arguing against national restrictions, including a second shutdown beginning later this week.

Farage and Brexit Party chairman Richard Tice announced the decision via a joint opinion piece in which they also proposed a herd immunity strategy for Britain.

“The debate over how to respond to COVID is becoming even more toxic than that over Brexit,” they claimed. “Lockdowns don’t work. In fact, they cause more harm than good.

“Focused protection is the key, targeting resources at those most at risk: the elderly, vulnerable or those with other medical conditions.

“The rest of the population should, with good hygiene measures and a dose of common sense, get on with life. This way we build immunity in the population. The young act as warriors, creating a shield of protection.”

The World Health Organisation has said herd immunity is “unethical” and Johnson has previously said it would not work and produce an “intolerable death toll”. Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison has called it a “death sentence”.

However Farage’s message will resonate in some parts of England, where unemployment has skyrocketed and a new lockdown will cause more economic and social upheaval. Britain’s first lockdown in spring enjoyed widespread support but the second is more polarising.

To be fair, neither WHO, Johnson nor Morrison have never heard of “Sweden.”

The issue of Sweden should be at the top of Farage’s agenda. I joke that people don’t know the country of Sweden exists, but the overwhelming majority of people don’t know that Sweden achieved one of the single lowest infection rates in Europe (possibly the single lowest) by doing absolutely nothing. They refused the lockdown, they refused the masks.

It isn’t being quoted, but Farage does directly mention Sweden in his op-ed for The Telegraph announcing this new direction:

Lockdowns don’t work: in fact, they cause more harm than good. But there is a credible alternative, recommended by some of the finest epidemiologists and medics in the world. It is the Great Barrington Declaration. It is effectively being practised to a large degree in Sweden, with considerable success.

Sweden of course made their decision long before the Great Barrington Declaration, but equating the two might be a good idea. Barrington offers a clear and thought-through path, it is signed by many doctors and scientists, and it means that nothing about the agenda is vague.

You can read the Great Barrington Declaration and see the signatories here.

People on the internet are accusing Farage of being an “opportunist” for making the lockdown his main issue.

Nigel Farage’s EU salary ran out, Trump is unlikely to remain President & it’s too cold to shout at refugees from Dover.

So now he seeks votes risking lives by opposing public health measures in a pandemic.

There has never been a more shameless opportunist in British politics. https://t.co/15Pniuf9ft

— David Lammy (@DavidLammy) November 2, 2020

Nice to see Nigel Farage getting involved in something that isn't tainted by any suggestion of opportunism

— Frankie Boyle (@frankieboyle) November 1, 2020

These people are actually morons.

Nigel understands what is going on: we are now in a society where everything that happens is defined by this virus hoax.

EXCLUSIVE FOOTAGE OF BEACH LANDING BY MIGRANTS

Shocking invasion on the Kent Coast taken this morning. pic.twitter.com/iuzAF0Uxz4

— Nigel Farage (@Nigel_Farage) August 6, 2020

These people are just trying to flee the violent persecution of the war in France.

Real news.

True facts.

The Independent:

Nigel Farage has been accused of trying to inflame anti-migrant tensions after claiming a small group of people on a beach amounted to a “shocking invasion on the Kent Coast”.

The Brexit Party leader made the comments as he posted an unverified video on social media of half a dozen people, some children, getting out of a dingy on a beach.

But anti-racism campaigners and charities pointed out that the people in the video were entitled to claim asylum, and accused the former MEP of needlessly whipping up hostility.

“Farage’s comment is completely dehumanising and designed to inflame tension against people in the most desperate situations,” Minnie Rahman, public affairs and campaigns manager at the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants said.

“Nobody would risk their life to make a dangerous journey unless they have run out of options. Those making these crossings are often fleeing war, violence and persecution.

“They have a legal right to have their voice heard when they arrive and they deserve safe and legal routes of entry – these routes are almost non-existent for vulnerable people seeking sanctuary.”

Steve Valdez-Symonds, Amnesty International UK’s refugee and migrant rights director, added: “These are women, men and children exercising their right to seek asylum in dangerous circumstances that they more than anyone else would much rather avoid.

“Sadly, they remain easy targets for too many willing to exploit their distress and suffering for attention or political gain.

“Tragically, rhetoric such as this will only prolong what it has long sustained – suspicion and hatred towards desperate people in need while perpetuating the very conditions that lead to these very journeys.”

The Independent isn’t trying to inflame anti-Farage tensions.

They’re just doing a report.

Doop-de-boop, just reporting the news.

Farage posted another intense video today.

Border Force can no longer cope and British fishing boats are now having to do the job. pic.twitter.com/ZZBjy0b1SE

— Nigel Farage (@Nigel_Farage) August 8, 2020

Talk about a deadly catch.

Jeez.

These people are coming from FRANCE.

There is NO SYRIAN CIVIL WAR in FRANCE.

The above shows the before and after of a 174 foot tall, 2,500 year old sandstone monument of Buddha, one of two destroyed by the Taliban in 2001.

So, when Nigel Farage compares these Black Lives Matter statue-destroyers to the Taliban, it’s a kind of obvious observation, so much that there doesn’t seem to be any reason to make it.

But, boy do they get mad.

The Guardian:

Nigel Farage is to leave the radio station LBC “with immediate effect”, the company has announced.

The Brexit party leader will no longer present his weekday evening show on the talk radio station, which has previously been investigated by the media regulator Ofcom.

“Nigel Farage’s contract with LBC is up very shortly and following discussions with him, Nigel is stepping down from LBC with immediate effect,” said the station’s managing director, Tom Cheal, in a message to staff. “We thank Nigel for the enormous contribution he has made to LBC and wish him well.”

Farage has yet to comment on his departure but his LBC producer tweeted to say he had learned the news via social media. The LBC presenter James O’Brien tweeted: “We got our station back.”

Farage has been a vocal critic of the recent Black Lives Matter protests and sources at the station pointed to internal fury over his comments earlier this week comparing protesters who destroyed the statue of Edward Colston in Bristol to the “Taliban”.

This appears to be the clip – it wasn’t even on his own show, he had appeared on Good Morning Britain (maybe he also said it on his show).

This is just so, so stupid.

I am worried that my takes are going stale. All I can think to do with these stories is point out the very obvious – that people are just out there getting hysterical at everything with no respect for facts.

Well, I’m sorry if “this is just plainly wrong” is getting boring. It is boring for me, too, to live in a reality where everyone is conditioned to respond to trigger words and ignore reality.

But, this is what we are dealing with.

They are doing here what the Taliban did. Simple as.

It took me a full minute to grasp why anyone would find this obviously true observation to be offensive.

Then, I remembered that the Taliban were supposed to be comic book villains so that the Bush-Blair foreign policy could be the hero, and that these people are living in a baby storybook world and want to bully you into living there with them, forever.

Well, no Taliban member ever called me goy.

I guess it’s a shame that they’re violent primitives, but they’re a lot like every other Arab in that regard. I can’t be bothered keeping track of which ones are the terrorists and which ones are the freedom fighters. I actually never even understood what the difference was.

So, I’m not even mad at the Taliban. Never had a problem with them, and it’s unlikely that I ever will. I’ve never been to Afghanistan, and I don’t want to go. Nothing to see there.

I’m also not mad at these Blacks, though I have had the same problems with them that we all have. But, they are just a force of nature. They only have a hammer, and the whole world looks like a nail. They’re just acting on command, and they don’t even get it.

They never did this stuff before, in 400 years of being in America, until our society started telling them to do it, and also allowing it.

So, maybe the root of the problem is the media, and government.

It’s a shame that Nigel can’t have his show. Anyone should be able to have media with whatever opinion. But, to be honest – I wasn’t listening anyway. If I wanted to rage against symptoms, I could just find an article to read about the I.N.C.E.L. terror threat.

It’s all the same.