Yesterday, I watched a video of fat, sweaty, limp-wristed black males “twerk” their buttocks at Washington, DC police.

Little did I know that I would soon witness something even gayer. I was still feeling queasy when I ran across this little gem. That’s when I lost my cookies.

Not only is the ad itself repulsively homo-fetishistic, but the concept of it is to present low-information people with a manufactured reality in which everyone is against Trump, so that they can agree with that fake consensus.

This is such naked voter deception that it should be illegal.

Huffington Post:

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) gushes in a new Republican ad that former Vice President Joe Biden is “as good a man as God ever created” — while President Donald Trump is a “xenophobic, race-baiting, religious bigot.”

What a difference an administration makes. The comments were pulled from  Graham’s past, “before he lost his conscience” and became one of the president’s staunchest defenders, noted a statement from the Republican Voters Against Trump.

“You want to know how to make America great again?” Graham asked in 2015. “Tell Donald Trump to go to hell.”

The ad backing Trump’s Democratic presidential rival features a very different Graham. It will run on Fox News in the Charlotte and Greenville markets, reaching both South Carolina and the swing state of North Carolina. It will also air on Fox News in Washington, D.C.

No healthy man would ever vote based on how nice or mean a candidate is. Rational men vote based on track record and policy. They will never meet the man in person. They are not voting on a dinner party attendee. The man’s personality has nothing to do with anything. Normal men vote based on perceived strength and loyalty.

This ad is meant to target white women, as is any messaging focusing on the niceness or meanness of people. They eat this stuff up, and could easily defect to Biden if they got enough of these messages.

Women respond to this messaging, because tribal leadership used to be synonymous with sexual access.

A woman’s only understanding of politics is as a rape fantasy.

What this ad is meant to communicate to white women is that Biden will be sweet and considerate to them, buy them flowers and give them multiple orgasms – because he is such a nice guy – whereas Trump will beat them savagely and knee-choke the necks of their young, like a lion culling the cubs of the previous male.

Like any warm-blooded creature, the white female voter would protest a little if a new male came into her environment, drove off her mate, killed her children, and forced himself upon her.

But, just as has happened countless times before, she would get over it, and that bitch would be making him eggs and bacon in the morning and calling him baby like the whole murder/replacement scene had never happened.

In that sense, it is impossible for a woman to have any sense of patriotism as you understand it. This is reflected in the root of that word, which is specifically paternal. The maternal concept would be matriotism, and does not exist, in language or reality.

A woman cannot have this sentiment, because unlike a man, she will never die for her country.

Men die for their country. Women sleep with the conquerors.

The previous generation probably should have thought about that before letting them vote.

The Jew Bill Kristol must be quite upset that his weird brand of Jewish propaganda disguised as “conservatism” is no longer believed by American goyim.

The Weekly Standard is an old neocon magazine that was co-founded in the 1990s by the evil Jew Bill Kristol. It quickly became a significant propaganda outlet promoting Jewish wars for Israel during George W. Bush’s presidency.

In recent years, the outlet has pushed an aggressive anti-Trump agenda. You could even argue that it has become transparently leftist in nature. This stance has caused them to lose subscribers to the point where the magazine’s parent company no longer views it as financially viable. There are numerous reports indicating that the publication is on the brink of shutting down.

Daily Caller:

The Weekly Standard is not expected to survive going into 2019 and is preparing to shut down permanently, according to a current staff member and former member of the magazine’s parent company who spoke to The Daily Caller News Foundation.

Rumors had been circulating throughout the media class Tuesday about the fate of The Weekly Standard in the wake of the magazine’s dwindling readership and circulation, despite a rebranding effort as the preeminent right-leaning periodical for conservatives opposed to President Donald Trump.

“I don’t expect it to exist after December 14, 2018,” one editor at the magazine told TheDCNF. “There is no budget for it AT ALL.”

Dinesh D’Souza mocked Kristol over these reports.

Maybe the owners of the @weeklystandard should hire some Vietnamese guys to run the mag. This would fulfill @BillKristol ‘s own prophecy that when native-born Americans become stupid, lazy, decadent & overpaid they can be replaced by more industrious immigrants

— Dinesh D'Souza (@DineshDSouza) December 6, 2018

Kristol responded to D’Souza by claiming that he was attempting to save “conservatism” from the Alt-Right.

A friend called my attention to this tweet, and distasteful though it is, I'm glad. It reinforces my determination, for what it's worth, to try to save conservatism from the alt-right and to advance a conservatism that "gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance." https://t.co/9HVQeNIRQ2

— Bill Kristol (@BillKristol) December 6, 2018

Tony Shaffer had a pretty good response to Kristol’s ridiculous tripe.

You are no conservative – you are a con man who is really a Trotskyite – why don't you focus for once on abandoning your propaganda and telling the truth

— Tony Shaffer (@T_S_P_O_O_K_Y) December 6, 2018

But Shaffer didn’t go all the way his criticism. If he did, he would have called out Kristol for being a full fledged Jewish racial activist. Every political stance Kristol has taken has been to benefit Jews and Israel at the expense of the American people. That’s why he has consistently pushed for endless wars in the Middle East while advocating for open borders in America. It’s also why he’s been a vocal critic of Trump. Any person of reasonable intelligence can see that there is absolutely nothing “conservative” about Kristol’s political positions.

Overall though, it is good to see that The Weekly Standard could be finished. It is another sign that these neocons and cuckservative types have lost political viability. The Republican Party is fully on board with Trump and these people are not going to subscribe to an allegedly “conservative” magazine that puts out anti-Trump articles. And the people who dislike Trump can read the plethora of liberal Jewish media operations that bash Trump non-stop.

There really isn’t any point to magazines like The Weekly Standard any longer. It’s honestly a surprise that they’ve been able to maintain their operations this long in what is an increasingly polarized political environment. Other than maybe a small handful of senile Bush-loving boomers, who the hell even reads The Weekly Standard these days?

If The Weekly Standard does officially cease operations, it will represent another sign that we are making significant political progress. Other neoconservative oriented publications like the National Review may face similar types of problems in the near future. People are no longer interested in reading Jewish propaganda disguised as “conservatism.”

The story of 6,000,000 Jews being randomly killed in gas chambers and ovens immediately rubs people as textbook war atrocity propaganda, a tall tale that would be shut down if ever exposed to objective and free scientific, archival and mathematical inquiry. In spite of this, enough people believe in the Holocaust myth to give it some weight in public discourse.

Why?

They look at Jennifer Rubin. Read Jennifer Rubin. Interact with Jennifer Rubin. “How could the Germans not want to exterminate these people,” asks the average man on the street.

That is one gassable face, no?

Jennifer Rubin is so sickening that even longtime Jew-appeaser John Derbyshire had a lapse in career-conservative discipline in his Goebbels-moment fighting back against one of her many public presentations.

I don’t like Bill O’Reilly, but his statement in the above clip that her Washington Post column is a fraud and that she is a liar is great; it shows he’s at least partially ready to call a Jew exactly what it is. Basically, Rubin is accusing him of sucking up to Trump in a feckless and dishonest way through her instruments of influence, yet, when confronted directly provides no proof because she’s a liar.

For all you recovering Conservatives who still use “liberal” (“liberal” media, “liberal” academia) as a euphemism for Jew, Jennifer Rubin is a “highly respected veteran conservative commentator” (just like fellow neocon Charles Krauthammer – it’s a mystery why they are on every single panel discussing Donald Trump in the press when nobody actually agrees with them).

Rubin grinds like we do at the Daily Stormer, publishing one article a day attacking Trump, calling for repercussions against the few people who give Trump a fair hearing, racially abusing White people. Here are some examples of what Jennifer Rubin has been writing.

The GOP has become a pity party for white males:

A cottage industry of apologists for Donald Trump and his supporters has sprung up to excuse, justify, infantilize and pity his core group of white, non-college-educated males who lash out at immigrants and globalism more generally. Victims ignored by elites! The Emmy winners mock them! There are more than a few problems with this.

First, conservatives used to stand up for “creative destruction,” the rise and fall of businesses and entire industries, which is an intrinsic part of a dynamic free market. If you’re not a hard-core Libertarian, the average conservative has considered the solution to this problem to be a safety net and tax, education and other policies that allow workers to rebound; it has never been to halt the marketplace or shift to a government-planned economy. The latter has been tried and has failed, as conservatives are quick to point out when ridiculing Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) or other anti-capitalist wags. It also exempts these voters from responsibility for their lives. The coal town is depopulated? Yes, that’s sad, but why are they not moving — as immigrants do — to where the jobs are?

Third, Trump’s defenders seem to demand that we treat members of his base delicately for fear of ruffling their feathers and damaging their self-esteem. When you play the “Hollywood makes fun of us” card, you get perilously close to political correctness and emotional feebleness, not things Trump and his ilk are supposed to promote. Even worse, complaining that other people don’t wish them “Merry Christmas” — and then transforming that into a war against Christianity — is victimology rarely seen outside the “safe spaces” on college campuses.

Fourth, the pity party for lower-class white males excludes virtually everyone else. Are we expected to turn the economy inside out for the latter, even to the extent that it harms those who have prepared themselves for a competitive workplace — or who simply want to enjoy moderately priced consumer goods not priced out of their grasp by tariffs? Why concern ourselves with the delicate sensibilities of the “Merry Christmas”-deprived and not with Mexican immigrants (“murderers”), women (Trump thinks it’s a mistake to let wives work outside the home), African Americans (whose lives he insists are a “disaster”), the disabled, etc.?

There is no virtue in pandering to Trumpkins at the expense of every other group and the country’s general prosperity. In making these white males (and only them) into victims and encouraging them to blame outsiders or menacing forces beyond their control, Trump does what Republicans used to accuse liberals of doing — pitting one group against another in a zero-sum conception of the economy. It is doing the Trumpkins no favors and it is heightening dissension in a country that needs to rediscover common values and shared endeavors and undertake some systemic reforms in government, education and criminal justice.

The GOP needs to wise up about immigration:

On the other hand, the Trump GOP could stay where it is with its sliver of a sliver of an aging electorate. The sane center-right — in the mold of the Gang of Eight and conservative independent Evan McMullin — could embrace responsible reform on this and a host of issues that are actually popular with voters and in accord with conservative principles. They stand to pick up many groups that have viewed the GOP as anti-immigrant and/or economically short-sighted. As the old white males who made up Trump’s base (and Fox News’s TV audience) literally die off over the ensuing decades, there will be insufficient numbers to stand on the hill of irrational and unpopular stances like immigration restrictionism. By then, however, the GOP could be long gone, which it will if it doesn’t wise up on this and a host of other issues.

Fox and the GOP need radical makeovers:

Fox News argues that it is a legitimate news organization and that Sean Hannity, among other nighttime hosts, is “entertainment.” (If so, he should not get the “Fox News” logo nor the accessories of a newsman, but let’s leave that for another day.) The unhinged non-news Hannity, who is widely seen as an adjunct to Donald Trump’s campaign — even going so far as appearing in a campaign ad for the GOP presidential nominee — now has attacked an actual news host, Megyn Kelly. He accuses her of being in Hillary Clinton’s camp. This is as obnoxious as it is false. The question, however, is now teed up for the Fox News execs: Is it a real news network that cares about the integrity of its news personnel or a caricature of right-wing media — in the thrall of know-nothingism, conspiracy-mongering and plain dishonesty?

Hannity’s behavior is so inappropriate that one has to wonder whether he is trying to get booted — or justify an upcoming post-election change. Nevertheless, the responsibility is Fox’s. If it cares about the reputations of quality news figures (e.g. Bret Baier, Chris Wallace, James Rosen) it will dump Hannity or relegate him to 21st Century Fox’s entertainment division. Fox cannot be both a serious outlet and tolerate Hannity’s attack on the integrity of its news people. The latter should be letting their bosses know in no uncertain terms: It is time to choose between the Fox News brand and the Hannity brand. The two are incompatible. 

Note: Chris Wallace and James Rosen, who she calls on to pressure Fox into firing the sole pro-Trump pundit on TV, Hannity, are both Jewish.

Jennifer Rubin’s been around long before Trump. To get an even more succinct glimpse into the mind of a psychotic, lying, hate-filled killer, Rubin has in the past endorsed a call to literally mass exterminate Palestinian women and children by tossing them “into the sea, to float there, food for sharks, stargazers, and whatever other oceanic carnivores god has put there for the purpose.”

She is a frantic defender of the Iraq War and continues to agitate for war against the “Axis of Evil” and Russia, supports the Wall Street bailouts, believes completely open borders and neo-liberal trade agreements are “vital” – I can go on and on.

Every single policy position she lobbies for is to the detriment of every single person in the world who isn’t a Jew!

Jennifer might act like a know-it-all, but she doesn’t know us that well. There are a lot more of us “pathetic, dying white males” than there are Jews. One day, if she keeps on pushing us, she’s going to get a booming knock on her door in the middle of the night with a deportation order to Israel. And when she gets there, we’re going to temporarily redirect military aid to the Palestinians so that they can strafe her and her family with F-15’s like they have been doing to them for the last 60 years.

To quote a time-resilient African proverb, “Talk Shit, Get Hit.” “Intellectual Conservative leaders” like Bret Stephens and Jennifer Rubin ought to heed that kind of wisdom, and pray to Satan that they’re able to stave off what comes from the broken levy that will follow a Trump victory.

There are only two types of white people who would dare venture into the vile, sleazy, depraved entrails of Washington, DC: college kids looking to score drugs and moral deviants working their ass off to destroy our country for money and prestige.

Nancy and David French both fall under the latter category.

When I first started seeing trolls making fun of French’s adopted black daughter, I felt a little bad for them. I still don’t agree with taking out any issues we have with them on the black girl, but for a different reason: she is nothing but an accessory in a Potemkin family. The Frenches use her in the same exact way Brangelina used their adopted non-white kids: as something to put on their resume as writers for Jew dominated publications like The Washington Post and the National Review. As a Daily Stormer Troll Ethicist, I say mocking these strivers for cross-racial adoption is fair game.

Here is just one of many examples of the French’s using the African child as living proof of their Judeo-Globalist bona fides: “I’m a White Republican Raising A Black Child: Deal With It.”

Recently, Nancy French has conjured up a brand new prop intended specifically to tarnish Donald Trump, by claiming to be a victim of sexual assault:

I was thinking of her, when the preacher’s thin mouth pressed against mine, his wiry tongue stuck down my throat. He pulled me down onto the love seat and ran his hands over my budding breasts. Though I’d failed the hitchhiker test, I had another chance to prove I was cool enough to deserve attention.

He offered me rides frequently over the next year. He came to the house, ostensibly to talk to my parents but lingered afterward. My parents didn’t suspect he was shoving his hands up my shirt on the porch.

It confused me to hear the values preached from the pulpit but ignored in real life. At church, he talked of how sexual immorality would send you to hell. Was he lying about the hell part or simply willing to let me go there?

Regardless, we were in love. Or, at least, we did the type of things that people in love did. I only knew about this phenomenon from movies, so I operated from the well-worn Hollywood script.

He didn’t do anything wrong. You caused this. You enjoyed it. You deserved it.

These whispers have bounced around my head for the better part of three decades. In fact, for an embarrassingly long amount of time, I told myself I simply had a relationship with my preacher. I didn’t know the word pedophilia.

According to Nancy, a youngish Baptist minister had some kind of sexual relationship with her when she was underage. She throws the word pedophile around, but doesn’t give what age she was when this was going on: there’s a big difference between an 11-year-old old girl and a 17-year-old woman. Details by and large are scarce, and she nor anyone else filed any police report or told her parents, despite her claiming in this article that many people in her town knew what was going on.

The story is either bullshit, or she was a sexually mature 16-year-old sleeping with a 20-something minister, which I guess is not a good thing, but it isn’t pedophilia. Her excuse for saying nothing about what she is claiming now was a sexual assault is that she didn’t know what was happening was illegal. Give me a break.

What this passive-aggressive cunt does next shows that this isn’t about her being a fragile petunia after a “sexual assault,” this is just another way to attack Donald Trump. This time, she really pushes the barrier by implying Trump is a child molester:

The first female president possibly will have ridden the coattails of her husband (who has been accused of rape) to the Oval Office; the GOP nominee likes younger women, used to hang out with a known pedophile and bragged on video about doing to women what the preacher did to me so many years ago.

As a side note, I have been collecting a lot of research on what I believe will be the final trap Jews (everyone involved in setting it is Jewish) will set up to block Trump’s way if he wins the election in December, and it’s regarding his relationship with the Jew predator Jeffrey Epstein. I will write more on this plot on a later date.

Never the less, what Nancy French is trying to do here is a monstrous defamation.

Is David French a Literal Cuckold? The Evidence

Looking into the background of Nancy French, I think there is a strong case to be made regarding her being a sexual deviant. David French himself is well-aware of this. When he departed for Iraq to become a military base lawyer, he told his wife she was not allowed to email or talk to her ex boyfriends on Facebook while he was away and couldn’t watch.

In her Instagram, there is a really weird pattern showing a fixation with athletic or authoritarian black men, as well as some bizarre symbolism.  White female attraction to black men, in the real world, is not very common – in fact quite aberrant (contrary to what they show you in movies and TV shows). With that said, the French’s give off a creepy vibe, and the only kind of non-Jews who are invited to be columnists for something like the Washington Post are thinly veiled (usually under a really fake-looking ear to ear smile) freaks and weirdos that help our enemies erode society in our name.

French doesn’t feature any pictures of black women (other than her virtue-prop daughter), so this isn’t to show tolerance. This is a woman publicly cucking her husband, talking about how much she admires some dindu… that bounces a basketball for a living.

Exhibit A: I  have not found any record of Nancy French interviewing this NBA nig for the Washington Post, mentioned in her blog, or any books she has written about him. So why is she skyping with him, and acting like a giddy groupie as she does it? How many actual fans of the NBA are female?

Exhibit B:  Here is another photograph, this time of Lebron James’ ass, with her own comment talking about how great the view was. Imagine if a man went to, say, a volleyball game, and took a picture of a female athlete’s ass talking about the great view – nobody would question the underlying motive. In this day and age, where women are often more sexually degenerate than men are, we shouldn’t hesitate to assume Nancy French took this photo with that very intent:

Exhibit C:   Here is another one, where she talks about spending the weekend alone with Milwaukee Sheriff David Clarke. What the hell? For the record, Sheriff Clarke is actually a pretty cool black guy who recently called for riots in favor of Donald Trump. It would be funny if he was cucking that testosterone deficient earthworm Never Trumper David French:

Exhibit D: Who is finger-painting Nancy’s last name on this shirt less black high school athlete? I know it’s for her daughter (WTF), but did she do it? What kind of school has “cheerleaders” like this in the first place?  She has no qualms indirectly complimenting the what she perceives as the masculinity of these male cheerleaders. It’s pretty inappropriate for a married woman in her 40’s, regardless of her motive:

Exhibit E: How does she know NBA player Kevin Durant? Durant is from Washington, DC, where Nancy works, by the way.

Exhibit F: Call me crazy, but this is really weird symbolism when contextualized with the other people , especially since her Instagram doesn’t have too many other pictures of food she eats.

It’s pretty clear that Nancy French has, at the very least, race-mixing tendencies or latent sexual desire for Negroes. This is pretty gross, and any woman I saw purposely taking pictures of some nigger’s ass along with some perverted kind of comments would get a sonic boom back hand across the face and swiftly tossed out of my house. There is, at the very least, far more evidence that would lead us to believe David French enjoys watching his wife have sex with black men, than there is any of Trump raping a 13-year-old girl (the frivolous allegation that Nancy was trying to smear Trump with in her article).

Even if we forget politics a minute, David himself exhibits typical Cuck tendencies in his disposition and view on women as well. He has constantly attacked Trump for having Machismo. Trump has a magnetic and dominant effect on women even at age 70, and while his billions obviously grease the wheels, his natural personality seals the deal. All women love Fascist – not conservative – men, and while Trump isn’t necessarily a Fascist ideologically, his personality archetype is a Jew’s “Authoritarian Personality” nightmare of a white man who can’t be tamed come to life:

If French thinks he has the right to try and attack Trump’s masculinity, then we have every right to do the same to French. He claims Trump’s masculinity is “counterfeit,” meanwhile , even though Trump can afford it, his wife Melania is a stay at home mom who raises his son herself – rather than leaving it up to a Jamaican nanny like rich dirtbags usually do. Trump’s wife stands by him through thick and thin, and is extremely well behaved. In this day and age, only a very small percentage of unusually masculine men have a wife like that, especially if the wife in question is a supermodel.

Yet somehow, David French wants us to think he’s the real man, with his careerist wife running off alone with strange men for entire weekends, as some illegal Mexican nanny raises their phony multi-cultural family. That’s almost as believable as the couple’s assertion that their work in trying to get their fellow GOP Evangelicals to vote for Hillary Clinton is about “moral principles”, rather than them being undignified sell outs and liars.

Thank God for the Twitter Sturmabteilung. We’re sick of these pieces of shit using their power to mess with us, they’re trying to destroy our country, now they’re being held liable.

Blood thirsty Jewish Neo-Con (redundant) and (((Never Trump))) activist Max Boot has written yet another article comparing Donald Trump to Hitler.  This time, he is bouncing the Hitler analogy off the recent Democratic party paramilitary bombing of an Orange County, North Carolina Trump campaign office, where instead of condemning the terrorist attack, he chides Donald Trump for condemning it.

The op-ed  is a glimpse into the demented mind of a Jew, and why no conservative will ever be able to keep up with these genetic bandits (Trump is not a conservative in the American cuckold sense). The first lesson to take from Boot is that Jews only respect the rule of law and democracy when they have a total grasp on it, once this begins to slip towards a more even share of power where the best ideas win, Jews will use their official positions and clout to support illegal activities that further their goals.

The second lesson is that Jews have no moral scruples about lying, killing or terrorizing political opposition if they see it fit – Jews are secretly cheering for the people who bombed the office, even if they have to say it in between the lines when they write for the general public.

The third lesson is that they are always on the attack, to the point that even when the Republican party of Trump is being subjected to political violence that has he will still blame people he perceives as having no right to a different opinion for it.

In the Los Angeles Times, he wrote “The Nazi Echoes In Trump’s Tweets”:

It goes without saying that Donald Trump is no Hitler — there is only one Hitler — and the firebombing of a Trump campaign office in Orange County, N.C., Saturday night was no Reichstag fire. But nevertheless there were some disturbing echoes of 1933 in Trump’s immediate response. He tweeted: “Animals representing Hillary Clinton and Dems in North Carolina just firebombed our office in Orange County because we are winning.”

There is so much wrong with that sentence it’s hard to know where to begin. In the first place Trump is not winning North Carolina — the Realclearpolitics average of polls has him down by 2.9 points. Second, you don’t refer to anyone — even arsonists — as “animals”; however deeply flawed, even criminal, they remain human beings. Third, and most importantly, there is no evidence to suggest that the arsonists were “representing” Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party.

Even if the attack was the work of local Democrats, it’s impossible to imagine that Clinton or the Democratic Party had anything to do with it. It’s just as likely to be a false-flag operation carried out by Trump’s alt-right supporters to implicate the Democrats. But Clinton rightly did not make any such allegation. All her Twitter feed said was: “The attack on the Orange County HQ ‪@NCGOP office is horrific and unacceptable. Very grateful that everyone is safe.”

This is a textbook example of the two-tiered dichotomy of the “official” press. Donald Trump is Hitler because he called the terrorists “animals,” meanwhile those who use violence to stifle an opinion they don’t like are the real mensches. While being indirect, Boot is also throwing out there that the bombing was a false flag by the Alt-Right (!), a line you should expect to gain traction if Jews are able to focus group it with any success.

While we know Hitler was the good guy, many others are indoctrinated against him, and constantly posed with the pestering, perturbed Hebrew-to-goy infanticide hypothesis: “Would you kill baby Hitler?”

The comparison of Trump to Hitler – and it’s no coincidence that it has been recklessly trotted out against other men Jews have ordered hits on (Saddam, Milosevic, Qaddaffi) – is meant to be inflammatory, it’s a thinly veiled green light to readers to commit acts of violence, even murder.  In modern Judeo-Merica, you can dress up as Satan, Bin Laden or Ted Bundy, but you will often run into trouble if you dress up as Hitler for Halloween – Hitler is worse than evil, though even this is dissipating as the methods and institutions who suppress the politically incorrect begin to wither away brick by brick .

Yet still, reading through Boot’s entire article, you will find not one condemnation of the actual act of bombing an opposing political party’s office, not even as an obligatory preface. The problem, Goyim, is you complaining about it.

Yet, all they’re doing with the Hitler analogy is showing people why Hitler said and did what he had to do. For the first time, with Trump, they might not be wrong in comparing him to Hitler: the masses are realizing they both stood for what’s right, and this is an epiphany the Judeo-Globalists will not be able to throw money at or swat down this time.

The clock is ticking…

Editor’s Note: I’ll just leave this here.

@MaxBoot