The only “Collusion” is that of the Democrats with Russia and many others. Why didn’t the FBI take the Server from the DNC? They still don’t have it. Check out how biased Facebook, Google and Twitter are in favor of the Democrats. That’s the real Collusion!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 15, 2018

That’s a whopper of a tweet right there.

The DNC server issue is one we’ve been over and over and over – how on earth these people are still saying Russia hacked it without ever having examined it is so insane it is difficult to even process mentally.

Just to refresh those who may have forgotten: The DNC hired a private company to examine the server, the private company is run by a Russian national who is an anti-Putin activist and they have been caught hoaxing Russian hacking in the Ukraine. The FBI, Mueller and the entire “intelligence community” took that private biased company on their word that they had found “Russian fingerprints” on the server, and then never bothered to find it themselves.

The DNC told them they couldn’t see it, and they were just like “lol OK np.”

This claim that Russians hacked the DNC is at the center of the Mueller probe and the entire conspiracy against Trump. And it is literally based on nothing. In fact, it is based on less than nothing – it is based on the “just trust us” claims of a DNC-hired anti-Russian group that has been caught lying about the exact thing they’re asking the whole world to just trust them on.

More Importantly

The Democrats did collude with Russia. The Uranium One scandal is real.

But whatever.

All of this Russian talk is just a distraction.

The real colluders are the tech companies.

Facebook, Twitter and Google are actively working to block access to entire types of information for the explicit purpose of promoting a partisan political agenda.

Whatever you want to say about my alleged “hate speech,” I am a Republican and a Trump supporter, and I have been systematically silenced by all three of those companies, as well as virtually every other company in the tech sector, including but not limited to:

• Cloudflare
• Amazon
• Tucows
• PayPal
• Stripe
• Patreon
• GoDaddy
• Dreamhost
• Sendgrid
• Discord
• Coinbase
• Virtually every domain registrar
• All advertising networks (even shitty Indian ones advertising Filipino brides)
• All payment processors

Though no one is as banned as me, every other individual (excluding Richard Spencer) associated with the Alt-Right has been banned from the three major platforms and others.

Alt-Lite figures have also been banned from a lot of things, though not to the same extent.

The Ralph Retort was recently banned from YouTube, even though the show is not explicitly political, simply for talking to people from the Alt-Right and Alt-Lite. YouTube also decided to steal $27,000 from cancer children that Ralph had raised for charity.

Roosh V is heavily banned simply for talking about feminism.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9c3jx9_6HI

Alex Jones is not even a hater of any sort, but is accused of “spreading theories,” and has been banned from the three major platforms, as well as multiple other services.

The entire campaign to silence Jones was run by CNN, which is now – like something out of the Twilight Zone – claiming it is a defender of the First Amendment.

Gab is not even political, but allows people to spread pro-Trump and Republican views, and has been banned from most things.

Now we’re entering into the realm of normie Republicans getting banned from things. The pro-life website LifeSite News was recently banned from their domain registrar.

The end goal is now clear: this was never about “hate speech” – it was always about silencing anyone who disagrees with the mainstream narrative, and in particular, removing any support for President Donald J. Trump from the entire internet.

I have absolutely zero doubt that the midterm election results were severely skewed by the efforts of these tech companies to silence and disenfranchise anyone who supports Republicans.

The tech companies are doing to us online what Antifa is doing to us on the street.

The 2020 election should be a done deal. But if the President does not act to ensure freedom of speech on the internet, then who knows what is going to happen.

Taking action on freedom of speech on the internet has to be the President’s number one priority. This should come before immigration, before trade, before NATO, before everything. Because if the people are not allowed to voice support for his agenda, then his agenda is dead in the water and he might as well just give up now.

He needs an executive order protecting the First Amendment on the internet. There needs to be an FCC ruling of the exact same kind as “Net Neutrality.” It can even be called “Net Neutrality.” Then this needs to be confirmed by the Supreme Court, with a ruling that says that the internet is the public square, and not private property owned exclusively by a cabal of colluding tech companies.

And this needs to happen yesterday.

What kind of deranged maniac could want to hurt such a wonderful man?

What you have to understand about bugmen is that they are as devoid of a heart as they are of a soul. As such, they can get worked up into a murderous frenzy by the idea of corporate regulations which might inconvenience their favorite entertainment providers.

Yes, only a bugman would threaten to kill a man’s entire family because he has different ideas about how ISP payment structures should be handled by the law.

The Verge:

A 33-year-old resident of Norwalk, California was arrested today for sending threatening emails to Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai last year, according to the US Department of Justice. The threats, sent by an individual named Makara Man, were made primarily in the second of three messages sent to Pai’s official FCC email accounts in late December, just days after the FCC voted to repeal net neutrality protections.

Who is this “Makara Man?”

Is that his supervillain name? Is his special power being a complete faggot?

Makara Man hits you with the power of limp-wristedness! It’s super effective!

The first email allegedly accused Pai of causing the suicide of a teenager through his actions that led to the net neutrality vote. The second email contained an explicit threat against members of Pai’s family, as well as a listing of three locations in and around Arlington, Virginia where Pai is said to live. The third email allegedly contained a photo of Pai and a separate photo of Pai and his family.

If some teenager killed himself because of net neutrality, then he probably would have done it sooner or later as a result of other stupid shit. Like, the passing of the wrong trade regulations in the EU, or maybe the death of his favorite ant or whatever.

I won’t live in a world without sufficient FCC controls over the internet.

According to the Justice Department, the FBI traced the emails to Man’s home, where he acknowledged sending the threats. He also confirmed his use of an email alias,”Stubblemanliness@gmail.com,” allegedly because the alias would make him seem “tougher,” according to the affidavit. Apparently, Man intended to “scare” Pai because he was “anger” over the repealing of net neutrality protections, the affidavit reads.

Yes, this bugman thought sending an email from an address named “Stubblemanliness” would make him seem “tough.”

Yeah, real intimidating screen handle, there, dude.

Man is being charged with threatening to murder a family member of an acting US official with the intent of interfering with said official’s job performance and duties, or threatening to retaliative against a US official for their specific job performance. The charge carries a maximum of 10 years in prison.

Since Pai’s controversial stance on net neutrality directly resulted in a successful vote to remove the Title II classification for internet service providers in December of last year, the chairman has been subjected to a fair amount of heated criticism online and off.

The gloves are coming off.

Shitlibs of all stripes – including celebrities – have been making horrible threats against various members of the Trump administration, and have so far suffered little to no consequences for their impudence.

The times, they are a changin’.

Yes, Jew, the times are indeed changing.

This marks the start of a new era, in which those who mess with the Trump regime are going to get their shit stomped by feds before being thrown into cages.

10 years in prison for threatening SAINT PAI would be a very lenient sentence.

But then again, he is a fair and merciful man.

The faggot bugmen of America whine that fascism has come to the White House. Well, they ain’t seen nothing yet.

There will come a time when every last blue check mark who ever said something about killing Trump is going to get hunted down like an animal and made to pay for his crimes.

Our megacorporation cyberpunk future is coming.

So, the world’s biggest telecom company (AT&T) just merged with the world’s third largest entertainment company (Time-Warner). This new megacorporation will own CNN, Warner Brothers, HBO and a host of other news and entertainment media, along with the internet infrastructure to deliver it to the people.

This is obviously a disaster – Time Warner is a kiked-out company pumping out vicious anti-White propaganda 24/7. This acquisition means that AT&T, one of America’s biggest internet service providers, now has financial incentive to promote their content across these tubes.

The Verge:

AT&T and Time Warner won a historic court victory this week, convincing Judge Richard Leon in the US District Court for the District of Columbia that they should be able to merge over the antitrust objections of the Department of Justice. The deal, now finalized, combines one of the world’s largest telecom carriers with one of the world’s largest media organizations.The resulting company will have unparalleled market power over both content creation and distribution.

Who is this judge? How fat do you have to be to become this corrupt and/or stupid?

Oh. Looks about right.

The Trump administration was rightly like, “yeah, nope” when this deal was first proposed, and sued the two companies to stop the merger.

But this guy apparently thought it was a fantastic idea to have two gigantic corporations merge into a vertically integrated monstrosity.

The decision surprised almost everyone — not necessarily that AT&T and Time Warner had won, but that Judge Leon allowed the merger to go through with no conditions or prohibitions on their behavior at all. In fact, Judge Leon’s opinion seems downright excited for the two companies, while systematically discounting the government’s case at every turn. Honestly, it’s a little strange.

No conditions!

AT&T could flat out block Fox News and MSNBC from their network, and it would be just fine by ol’ Rick here.

And by the text of his decision, it appears he’s either retarded, or pretending to be retarded.

And I don’t know which is worse.

Here’s Leon, glowingly writing about AT&T’s argument for the merger:

At the same time, Facebook’s and Google’s dominant digital advertising platforms have surpassed television advertising in revenue. Watching vertically integrated, data-informed entities thrive as television subscriptions and advertising revenues declined, AT&T and Time Warner concluded that each had a problem that the other could solve: Time Warner could provide AT&T with the ability to experiment with and develop innovative video content and advertising offerings for AT&T’s many video and wireless customers, and AT&T could afford Time Warner access to customer relationships and valuable data about its programming. Together, AT&T and Time Warner concluded that both companies could stop “chasing taillights” and catch up with the competition. Those are the circumstances that cause them to claim today that their merger will increase not only innovation, but competition in this marketplace for years to come.

An excellent summary of AT&T’s pitch to its investors! But did you spot the glaring foundational error? Judge Leon thinks Facebook and Google are vertically integrated, data-informed competitors to AT&T and Time Warner. And that is sort of true, in that Google owns YouTube and pays for some premium content there, and Facebook is doing whatever doomed video thing Facebook is always doing.

But neither Facebook nor Google owns the ultimate distribution layer of the consumer connection to the internet. They aren’t the world’s largest telecom company. Neither is Netflix or Amazon or any of the other companies AT&T and Time Warner are afraid of. (Yes, I know Google owns Google Fiber, but that has been more failure than success.)

Basically, judge Leon doesn’t understand (or pretends not to understand) the difference between an internet service provider and a company with a website.

In principle, an internet platform can’t directly undermine their competitors by blocking or throttling their traffic, or charging customers more for access to their competitor’s services. But an ISP like AT&T could totally do that. In other words, you get free access to CNN and HBO with your internet service package, but have to pay extra for YouTube, Netflix, and so on.

Ajit Pai frowns upon these shenanigans.

Of course, this is now legal due to the abolition of net neutrality (which is obviously a good thing). But a situation in which a single company is both a massive telecom provider and a major internet platform is something completely new and obviously harmful to the freedom of the internet.

This is why the government acted to stop this insane merger.

It’s almost like this absurd decision was an “up yours” to the Trump administration, saying “oh, you abandoned net neutrality? Watch this.”

We can only hope that the Trump administration will take new steps to curtail this emerging megacorp’s dark power.

New FCC regulation preventing ISPs from giving preferential treatment to any of its subsidiaries would be a nice “fuck you” to these people, making the merger nearly meaningless. Even better, reclassifying ISPs as “telecommunication services” would solve this problem, as well as all our censorship woes.

Do it, Ajit Pai.

Well, anyone who loves Reeses peanut butter cups can’t be all that bad, I can tell you that.

The removal of “Net Neutrality” has generated a level of liberal butt-hurt I’ve rarely seen before, and on those grounds alone I can only applaud the decision for the spectacle it generates.

It’s also a very good policy that’s sure to help modernize America’s obsolete internet infrastructure.

Now, angry leftists are accusing the FCC chairman Ajit Pai, a dot Indian, of being some kind of Alt-Right sympathizer.

Alternet:

On Thursday, the Federal Communications Commission voted 3-2 along party lines to repeal an Obama-era regulation to preserve net neutrality, defying Silicon Valley executives and consumer advocacy groups, not to mention the will of the people. A recent University of Maryland survey finds that more than 80 percent of registered voters oppose the FCC’s plans.

What a surprise, the masses side with the giant globalist corporations that control everyone’s access to information.

The move will fundamentally transform the internet as we know it, allowing corporate behemoths like Verizon and Comcast to manipulate loading speeds and charge customers a premium for access to individual websites and apps. Adding insult to democratic injury, circumstantial evidence suggests the man who cast the deciding vote, Ajit Pai, sympathizes with the so-called alt-right.

“Manipulate loading speeds.”

No it won’t, you retards. Selective throttling is already against FCC rules. All it allows these companies to do is charge a premium to corporations like Netflix who are hogging up all the bandwidth [The internet is not a big truck and you can’t just dump things on it. -AA]. This is why these Silicon Valley types are against it – they don’t want to be the ones who pay for the infrastructure costs their own business requires.

Why would Comcast charge the users extra for their access to Netflix, when they can now just charge Netflix themselves?

This is why all these corporations are in favor of Net Neutrality – they want to ensure that consumers are forced to pay the price of internet infrastructure, not them.

Back in November, the FCC chairman and Trump appointee unveiled his plans to junk the net neutrality rules established in 2015, arguing that websites and social media platforms, rather than internet service providers (ISPs), posed the greatest threat to an open internet. At the time, Pai singled out Twitter for blame.

“The company has a viewpoint and uses that viewpoint to discriminate,” he told the R Street Institute, a libertarian-minded think tank. “And to say the least, the company appears to have a double standard when it comes to suspending or deverifying conservative users’ accounts as opposed to those of liberal users. This conduct is many things, but it isn’t fighting for an open internet.”

It’s difficult to know exactly who Pai had in mind, but Slate’s April Glaser notes that Twitter recently deverified the accounts of several prominent white supremacists, including Laura Loomer and Jason Kessler.

In the minds of Alternet journalists, Jews can be White supremacists. Wew.

“What’s weird about Pai’s comments is that while these are all figures on the right, conservatives don’t typically count them among their ranks,” Glaser writes. “And while conservatives do sometimes cast themselves as ideological victims of Silicon Valley’s overreach, there have been no recent deverifications of prominent right-wing figures, ‘conservative’ or otherwise, not known for promoting hate. In other words, according to Pai, the demotion of racists on a social network is a bigger deal than an action that could radically change the architecture of—and who succeeds on—the internet.”

Sounds about right.

The fact that these major corporations crack down on political speech they disagree with completely undermined their hoax claim that they “care about free-speech.”

Twitter certainly doesn’t care about free-speech. Only their bandwidth costs.

There is a standard for what speech is allowed in America. It’s called the first amendment. Anyone not following that standard is de facto engaging in politically motivated censorship.

After the FCC chairman pleaded his case that social media networks were suppressing free speech, he earned the effusive praise of far-right radio host Matt Forney and Andrew Torba of Gab, a platform where users “are generally free to be as racist or anti-Semitic as they’d like without fear of being reprimanded or censored,” according to Slate.

Pai is not Alt-Right.

But like other departments of the Trump administration, the FCC is doing a great job of trolling liberals and Jews into histrionics.

Feels good, man.

Game over.

Net neutrality was repealed today.

RT:

The Federal Communications Commission has voted to repeal the rules classifying internet providers as public utilities. Critics say this will lead to pay-for-play behavior by providers, while FCC chair argues it will benefit consumers.

The Republican-majority commission voted along party lines on Thursday to repeal the 2015 rules adopted under the Obama administration, which classified ISPs as public utilities under a 1934 law intended to regulate telephone service. FCC chairman Ajit Pai has argued that these “heavy-handed” regulations throttled investment and innovation and harmed poor and rural consumers.

“This is not Thunderdome. The FCC is not killing the internet,” Commissioner Brendan Carr said at the hearing on Thursday. “We are not relying on market forces alone. We are not giving ISPs free reign to dictate your online experience.”

“I dissent from the contempt this agency has shown our citizens in pursuing this path today,” said Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel, adding the repeal puts the FCC “on the wrong side of history.”

According to the Jewish media, the end of net neutrality is literally the apocalypse, brought about by Donald Trump because he is evil.

Specifically for the sole reason of being evil. And insane.

Saying in this situation that he is evil for siding with mega-corporations makes no sense, as it is all even bigger corporations that he is standing up against.

Basically, they lost the censorship scare ground when they kicked me offline. They can no longer use that. And that was their main thing: “Comcast will censor you.”

So I am reading articles saying things like: “oppressed minorities will have a more difficult time accessing needed healthcare information.”

Actual headline from a Jew. The goyim will forget about the “free and open internet” thing – now it’s about stealing tubes from poor people.

They are also saying your computer will be hacked because of this act by the evil madman Trump.

Their main argument now is that Netflix is going to charge you more because Comcast is going to start charging them more. Neither of those companies have said anything to indicate this is true. I would not be surprised if Netflix upped fees regardless, just to prove a point.

Your cuck porn just got $2 a month more expensive. Might as well off yourselves. 

Of course, that could then be proven and viewed as gouging.

In the long run, killing NN means more investment into infrastructure, and thus a faster internet.

The actual situation is that Silicon Valley was engaged in rent-seeking, getting the government to force Comcast to give them unlimited free internet, and they have now been blown the fuck out. The FCC ruling was largely based on what they did to The Daily Stormer. Because the argument for net neutrality was that Comcast would censor people, and then Google, GoDaddy, Tucows, Cloudflare – not to mention PayPal, Facebook, Twitter and YouTube – all censored me and others.

They have attempted to act in unison to exile me from the internet. They have done so with the aid of the entire system of activist journalists (who view this site both as a political opponent and a business competitor), along with a network of criminals.

The FCC said “your argument that you are against censorship is now void.”

They keep talking about how horrible the internet was in 2015, before NN was passed – however, I distinctly remember having no problems in before 2015.

BREAKING VIDEO: Moment FCC Chairman @AjitPaiFCC as he advises evacuation. Bomb squad with K9s on the scene. pic.twitter.com/IUFbw8gD97

— The Anon Journal (@TheAnonJournal) December 14, 2017

Everything they’re saying is nonsense, which is why they cannot come up with a coherent argument.

The reason they are making so much noise about it is:

a) because it is taking power away from Silicon Valley, and they want power consolidated there because it is extremely politically liberal and will censor people, and

b) because most journalists writing about it don’t know what it is, and thus are going into a confused rage as they struggle to explain something they understand nothing about.

But I can tell you: it is only good for us.

This is the first step in a drastic reshaping of internet, making it free as it was before Obama’s second term.

As long as you can theoretically afford up to $2 more a month for your Netflix, you’ve got nothing to worry about.

Jewish intimidation groups are in a wild frenzy ever since we were able to raise money for wrongfully terminated patriot Tony Hovater. He was able to raise at least $8,000 dollars, which provoked rage and disbelief from the international Jew!

Last interview I did with Tony, he said he has reached an outpouring of support, including from people who don’t share all of his beliefs. Jew mad bro?

Both the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Anti-Defamation League are trying to pressure domain hosts and registrars to shut down free speech crowdfunding platforms like Goy Fund Me and Hatreon. Their push cohencides with large coordinated DDoS attacks from certain (((hackers))) against alt-tech. I’m sure the ADL and SPLC know nothing about this!

But this isn’t even the tip of the iceberg. Even 501(c)(3)s dedicated to protecting free speech are getting no platformed by private companies.

Both the ADL and SPLC successfully convinced their friends at Amazon to ban the Foundation for the Marketplace of Ideas from their Amazon Smiles program. You see, Jews live by the Elliot Rodger philosophy of needing to ask them for permission before donating your own money to a charity of your choice.

SPLC:

It probably seemed like an easy way to raise funds for the Foundation for the Marketplace of Ideas (FMI).

FMI created a charity profile on Amazon.com through the Amazon Smile program and pulled 0.5 percent of some purchases toward alt-right causes.

But, the online retailer put an end to the cash collections by white nationalist attorney Kyle Bristow. As of Wednesday, Amazon shut down FMI’s donation collections by making it ineligible to take part in the charity fundraising program.

Amazon posted a message saying FMI was “no longer eligible” for the program and any funds donated could be redirected to another charity.

It isn’t known how much money the organization, run by Bristow as the legal arm of the alt-right, made from Amazon’s charity fundraising outlet. But, Bristow, in a tweet Wednesday morning, said it wasn’t much.

“It appears @amazon doesn’t like civil rights groups which advocate for the First Amendment!,” wrote Bristow, who has represented alt-right figures in lawsuits around the country. “0.5% of the purchase price of a cheap Chinese product is very nominal.”

Amazon’s move is the latest by online companies and social media to drop, block and decertify figures from the alt-right.

The move brings Amazon in line with PayPal, which agreed to block at least 34 organizations from using its services after an SPLC report highlighted how extremists used the platform to fund the rally in Charlottesville, Patreon and others in dropping racists and white nationalists from their platforms.

The only thing the FMI does is take up First Amendment causes the Jewish litigation group ACLU refuses to take up.

This is very different from what the SPLC does, which is to list the names and personal information of political dissidents with inflammatory and usually inaccurate biographies. Jews at the SPLC even get Christian churches banished from the Smiles program. Merry Christmas, goyim!

Building a legal organization that can help protect actual dissidents (not fags trying to force Christians to cater their gay pretend marriage) is of vital importance in this age of almost unprecedented repression.

If you’re giving money to Lauren Southern, you are taking money from the FMI and underground crime think like The Daily Stormer. Support activists, art projects, and subscribe to as much alt-media (TRS, Red Ice, etc) as you can. If we don’t continue to find new and creative ways to defend ourselves from Jewish hegemony, their plan to wipe us from the face of the earth will go on.

They will kill the West in its sleep!

Donate to FMI

Kyle Bristow is doing God’s work, and anything you can throw his way is money you can be certain is going to the right place.

To donate to FMI, please mail a check or money order made out to “Foundation for the Marketplace of Ideas, Inc.” to:

Foundation for the Marketplace of Ideas, Inc.
P.O. Box 381164
Clinton Twp., MI 48038

Please be sure to include your name and mailing address with your donation so that a tax-deductible donation receipt can be mailed back to you.

Alternatively, payment by credit card can be made via the website of GuideStar—which rates FMI as a platinum participant.  (The only donation feature is immediately below the header and above the taskbar.)

You can also sign up to pledge a monthly donation by credit card to Kyle Bristow via Hatreon.

The head of Trump’s FCC Ajit Pai is no fan of Twitter’s censorship policies and that’s a good thing.

The head of the Federal Communications Commission Ajit Pai just took a massive shit on Silicon Valley at a speech yesterday. He specifically singled out Twitter as being one of the main companies stifling free political speech on the internet.

Reuters:

The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, Ajit Pai, accused social media company Twitter Inc (TWTR.N) of being politically biased on Tuesday as he defended his plan to roll back rules intended to ensure a free and open internet.

Pai, a Republican named by President Donald Trump to head up the FCC, unveiled plans last week to scrap the 2015 landmark net neutrality rules, moving to give broadband service providers sweeping power over what content consumers can access.

“When it comes to an open internet, Twitter is part of the problem,” Pai said. “The company has a viewpoint and uses that viewpoint to discriminate.”

He pointed to Twitter’s refusal to let Representative Marsha Blackburn, a Republican, advertise a campaign video with an anti-abortion message.

“To say the least, the company appears to have a double standard when it comes to suspending or de-verifying conservative users’ accounts as opposed to those of liberal users,” Pai said.

And what Pai talked about is just the tip of the iceberg as far as censorship on Twitter is concerned. They’ve banned nearly everyone of notable significance that has a political view to the right of Karl Marx. At least they’ve banned everyone they can get away with banning. Twitter’s CEO Jack Dorsey would probably ban Donald Trump from the platform if he could get away with it.

Pai also attacked a handful of celebrities including Cher and Marc Ruffalo who not surprisingly support net neutrality.

Taking away #NetNeutrality is the Authoritarian dream. Consolidating information into the hands of a few controlled by a few. Dangerous territory. https://t.co/ZVdvmGzcHf

— Mark Ruffalo (@MarkRuffalo) November 21, 2017

Net Neutrality means
Trump can Change The
Internet ‼️It Will Include LESS AMERICANS NOT MORE‼️
Now Comcast,AT&T,Google
Will show you ONLY WHAT THEY WANT YOU TO SEE ‼️SLOWER AND MORE EXPENSIVE AT THEIR WHIM‼️SEE LESS,CHARGED MORE…

— Cher (@cher) November 22, 2017

It’s honestly amazing that there are people among our ranks who still think net neutrality is a good thing. These regulations only serve to empower the Silicon Valley companies who actively censor political content. And besides, since when have moronic celebrities like Marc Ruffalo or Cher ever been right about anything?

It isn’t like the proposal to repeal net neutrality is a radical thing. These regulations have only been in place since 2015. The internet operated fine before 2015. Anybody saying otherwise is spreading nonsensical fear to justify keeping these regulations which have done nothing to prevent existing internet censorship.

Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince is a diabolical asshole who opposes free speech.

Cloudflare’s CEO Matthew Prince is back in the news. This is the same man who woke up in a bad mood one day and decided to ban the Daily Stormer from using Cloudflare’s distributed denial of service or ddos protection offering. His rationale for this is that we were a bunch of “assholes” and had to be banned. This move proved conclusively that he has no interest in protecting free speech on the internet. In fact, this move proved that he is directly opposed to it.

Suffice to say, this guy is a real clown. It’s hard to believe that this is the caliber of person in charge of a fairly sizable Silicon Valley tech firm.

As with nearly every other company in Silicon Valley, Prince favors existing net neutrality regulations. He’s vowed to fight the Federal Communications Commission plan to overturn it even though he thinks the change would be good for his company.

Repeal of #netneutrality is likely good for @Cloudflare. With our scale we’ll be able to negotiate for fast lanes with ISPs and squeeze smaller players out. But it’s BAD FOR THE INTERNET — so we will fight the #FCC to oppose it. #dotherightthing

— Matthew Prince (@eastdakota) November 21, 2017

He feels so strongly about net neutrality, that he was openly plotting on Twitter to rate limit the FCC chairman’s internet access!

I could do this in a different, but equally effective, way.

— Matthew Prince (@eastdakota) November 23, 2017

sent note to our GC to see if we can without breaking any laws.

— Matthew Prince (@eastdakota) November 23, 2017

Now let’s just think about this. Supporters of net neutrality are concerned that companies like Comcast, Verizon and other internet service providers will rate limit traffic and censor specific types of content if existing regulations are repealed. This is the main point they’ve been pushing to justify their claim that net neutrality is a good thing. So why is Prince, a major supporter of net neutrality, openly plotting to do that exact same thing on Twitter? He even said that he’d discuss the matter with his general counsel!

I’m certainly no fan of big ISPs like Comcast or Verizon but at least we don’t see people on their top management teams plotting weird schemes like this. There is also no evidence of them having ever blocked sites based on political content.

Why should we believe that we need net neutrality when Prince himself is plotting this type of chicanery? It shows once again that the biggest threats to internet freedom are these Silicon Valley companies who support net neutrality.

Facebook, Google, Twitter, Cloudflare and many others already have a proven track record of censoring political content they dislike. Do you really think that they support net neutrality because they believe in free political speech? They’re all opposed to it and this fool that runs Cloudflare has shown that to be true yet again.

The head of the Federal Communications Commission Ajit Pai is apparently getting harassed for promising to repeal net neutrality.

The Hill:

Federal Communications Commission (FCC) chairman chairman Ajit Pai asked people to stop harassing his family over his attempts to roll back net neutrality provisions.

During a Monday interview on Fox News’s “Fox & Friends,” Pai addressed a sign that was put up outside his home that mentioned his children’s names and read: “They will come to know the truth. Dad murdered Democracy in cold blood.”

“It certainly crosses a line with me,” Pai said.

“I understand that people are passionate about policy, but the one thing in America that should remain sacred is that families, wives and kids, should remain out of it,” he continued.

“And stop harassing us at our homes.”

I have a friend that lives near @AjitPaiFCC. Net neutrality "activists" posted these signs, featuring his children's names, outside his house. Pizzas also reportedly sent to his house every half-hour last night. pic.twitter.com/jWI4gV6Hvc

— Brendan Bordelon (@BrendanBordelon) November 25, 2017

There’s no doubt that Silicon Valley is going into overdrive trying to keep net neutrality regulations in place. That’s because they’ve been the main beneficiaries of this policy. They are going all out with a propaganda campaign to make people believe that repealing net neutrality will result in the end of internet freedom. Their campaign has been effective enough to the point where they’ve convinced useful idiots to harass the FCC chairman’s family. The good news is that it doesn’t appear as if he’s getting scared off from the harassment. It looks as if he is going to go through with the repeal.

As we already know, the Silicon Valley position is absurd because internet censorship is in full force despite net neutrality being in place since 2015. The Daily Stormer is the foremost example of how Silicon Valley has conspired to eliminate a political view from the public square. We’ve been banned from multiple domain registrars and blacklisted from every major social media site and service imaginable. The FCC’s net neutrality regulations have done nothing for us.

The same companies responsible for censoring political views on the internet are claiming that we need net neutrality to prevent internet censorship. How can people not see the hypocrisy with this position?

Net neutrality supporters are more concerned with the theoretical censorship that internet service providers might engage in than the actual real life censorship engaged in by Silicon Valley.

Here’s our weekly content digest! Show your appreciation for the authors by helping preserve their work for posterity through the process of samizdat. Download this weekly edition, archive it on your local storage, reupload it to a different location than you found it, and share it from there. Encourage others to do the same.

• PDF: 117 pages, 3.86M
• ePub: 805 pages, 3.47MB

As fourteen is such a special and magical number for our people, it is a privilege to be able to introduce this fourteenth volume of Stormer with monumental news about the Stormer, and the future of our Constitution and its glorious First Amendment.

For the past few years Silicon Valley has been pushing this “net neutrality” garbage. Ostensibly they did this because it allows them to push unlimited amounts of streaming video and rich media on other people’s networks without paying, essentially forcing consumers, even those that don’t use their worthless kike media distribution points to subsidize their massive bandwidth bills. Web giants like Google, Facebook, Netflix, Twitter, and many more have said without net neutrality regulations on ISPs, the ISPs will start censoring the Internet and filtering content.

The only problem is that those same web giants are the ones actually doing the censoring, and so it is obvious their insistence on FCC regulation of the ISPs had nothing to do with free speech. This week, that changed. This is not Obama’s FCC, and it just ended Obama’s “net neutrality” fictions. I read the filing. It mentions us by name. It uses multiple sources involving us as a reference.

The Trump administration just used the Daily Stormer to tell kike Zuckerberg, nigger lover Jack, atheist Reddit degenerates, and that pederast that runs Netflix to jump off a cliff. This is something that happened.

261. Consensus against blocking and throttling

We emphasize once again that we do not support blocking lawful content, consistent with long-standing Commission policy. The potential consequences of blocking or throttling lawful content on the Internet ecosystem are well-documented in the record and in Commission precedent. Stakeholders from across the Internet ecosystem oppose the blocking and throttling of lawful content, including ISPs, public interest groups, edge providers, other content producers, network equipment manufacturers, and other businesses and individuals who use the Internet. This consensus is among the reasons that there is scant evidence that end users, under different legal frameworks, have been prevented by blocking or throttling from accessing the content of their choosing. It also is among the reasons why providers have voluntarily abided by no-blocking practices even during periods where they were not legally required to do so. As to free expression in particular, we note that none of the actual incidents discussed in the Title II Order squarely implicated free speech. If anything, recent evidence suggests that hosting services, social media platforms, edge providers, and other providers of virtual Internet infrastructure are more likely to block content on viewpoint grounds.

Right at the end of that paragraph they put a footnote referencing articles about Stormer’s situation of dozens of its domains being seized these past months, including a pretty extensive analysis by the Electronic Frontier Foundation of why it is just absolutely insane for domain registries and registrars to be able to steal domains because they don’t like the content they publish. I used to work in the telecom industry and I have read no small number of FCC filings. They are dry as a rule, but this placement is the closest equivalent of them saying “actually it is YOU KIKES doing the censorship and ending the open internet, despite all your sodomite whining about MUH NET NEUTRALITY and MUH FREEDOMS, so SHUT UP FAGGOT.”

“Net neutrality protects free speech” was their only argument for why this piece of regulation was in the public good, and then they went and burned down free speech on the Internet. Now it’s time to pay the piper, and that piper is playing ‘Do You Hear the People Sing’.

Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, Netflix, and Google spent unfathomable amounts of money and political capital trying to get this Net Neutrality garbage to be the standard of Internet governance, and they just badly lost, because they were traitors to the Constitution.

Calling social media Internet infrastructure is going to be alarming language in San Francisco, and means the assault on Stormer’s freedom to publish is being talked about in a much wider sense of potential sweeping future regulations that will protect political speech across all Internet services. This is part of the Bannon plan to regulate social websites as utilities. Indeed, his publication is echoing this exact narrative in perfect unison.

Breitbart:

But it’s weird for ISPs to be the primary target of such fears, when it’s online platforms and services (the ones not currently subject to Net Neutrality rules) that did precisely that. Specifically Google and GoDaddy, which cut off domain support for the Stormer, and Cloudflare, which cut off DDoS protection to the site.

This is not a coincidence, that’s for sure. His hand is behind all of this. This will be our and Bannon’s mutual and lasting legacy to the world: the preservation and triumph of the First Amendment on the Internet for every living being on earth, and its inevitable extension to other planets.

WOTAN: Will of the American Nation.

They thought that they could break us by deplatforming us but the pressure forged us into a weapon of mystical sharpness which Bannon is picking up and stabbing right into the heart of the wicked Jew beast. Like Sigurd slaying Fafnir, or St. George killing the dragon.

It’s happening now, as the levels of goyim knowing rise nearly to 1933 levels.

This FCC filing is a stunning document, and it would not in a million years have come out of Hillary’s FCC, I can tell you that. Those of you who blackpill on a regular basis about the current administration please take note.

I love you Trump.

I know what I’m thankful for this Thanksgiving, unlike the sick kike media. I’m thankful for our President, I’m thankful for Bannon, and I’m thankful that we have parts of our government legitimately fighting for the foundations of liberty and free expression that our white European ancestors bled and suffered to give us today.

Given all of this information, don’t you think it is odd that the SJW hashtag #resist crowd was fighting to save free expression? It was never actually about a bandwidth bill for whatever increased rent local bandwidth oligopolies can extract. That bill is really quite small in terms of their revenue. It was about framing arguments over “free speech” and “the free and open Internet” over regulations that could never hope to achieve either. It was about giving Mark Zuckerberg unilateral control over what the world can see and hear, and it massively failed because Donald J. Trump is President, and because the Stormer posted with enough amplitude to troll them into exposing their whole plan.

We will have regulations that ensure free speech on the Internet, and it won’t be this ineffectual Title II garbage from the Obama years. It will be a transformative thing, and it will unleash a plague of frogs on Twitter at full force again. The cavalry is coming, my friends, and it is coming to do something about these kikes.

Hail Victory.