The House introduced a bill to introduce a bust of Zelensky at the US Capitol. Ukraine is the 51st state apparently. pic.twitter.com/7uq0ZETEjg

— Catch Up (@CatchUpNetwork) January 12, 2023

The Democrats declared war on a country that opposes double-fisting for kids, and the GOP response was to rush in and say “YOU’RE NOT DOING THIS WAR HARD ENOUGH!”

It’s difficult to wrap your head around the idea that a permanent statue of Zelensky belongs in the US Capitol, but Republicans were able to think of that.

RT:

Conservative US lawmakers critical of the adulation of Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky have rallied against a proposal to place a bust of the foreign leader in the Capitol building in Washington. US Representative Joe Wilson has suggested making a Zelensky statue a permanent feature.

Wilson, a Republican from South Carolina, made a proposal on Monday to direct the Fine Arts Board to obtain a bust “for display in a suitable, permanent location in the House of Representatives wing of the United States Capitol.”

Some members of the GOP’s Freedom Caucus, which includes a conservative minority opposing unconditional support for Ukraine, expressed skepticism. Andy Biggs of Arizona, one of its leading members, asked whether Congress allocating over $100 billion in aid to Ukraine was “not enough.”

Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia said she was “absolutely not” approving the idea, adding that US lawmakers were serving “America not Ukraine.”

Popular conservative talk show host Tucker Carlson branded the idea “insane,” telling viewers that Zelensky is a “dictatorial” politician who banned opposition parties in his country and is currently cracking down on a Christian denomination. Having a bust of Zelensky at the Capitol would allow Americans to “worship him daily,” he joked.

I’m sure whoever gets contracted to do the bust is going to have a lot of fun looking at pictures of this guy.

Which expression should be on the statue?

https://t.co/6VLQYAlcto

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) April 14, 2018

Here we can see Trump sucking Jew and Saudi dicks while trying to justify potentially causing WWIII by bombing Syria on the evening of the 13th of April.

You may want to grab the fence, get some CDs burned, and buy some ammo and food. This could result in nuclear war.

Get comfy, fam.

Former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair is out and about shilling for war in Syria over the false flag gassing hoax.

I guess we can trust him on this – he was right about Iraq after all.

They were a terrorist state hellbent on global domination using nuclear weapons, now they’re a thriving, modern democracy.

What no, sorry – I’m thinking of something else…

The Iraq war he sold us didn’t really work out very well at all, and this is basically the exact same thing, so…

Sky News:

Tony Blair has declared the UK “will have to” back any US-led military intervention in Syria or give “carte blanche” for the future use of chemical weapons.

The former Prime Minister called for Theresa May to act and said she did not need the approval of MPs through a vote in Parliament.

Speaking after a suspected chemical attack in the city of Douma that reportedly killed 70 people and injured 500, Mr Blair said those responsible must be “held to account”.

He told Sky News: “If you don’t respond to the use of chemical weapons against civilians then obviously we’re ignoring what the international community has said.

“Which is that this is unacceptable and those that use such methods should be held to account and we’re giving carte blanche for the use of chemical weapons.

“So I think it’s a pretty simple equation.

“Even if we take the action – which I think we will have to do – it doesn’t solve the longer-term question of what happens in Syria.”

Pushed on whether ministers should call a Commons vote on joining any US action, Mr Blair said: “They don’t strictly need one and we’re not talking about ground action, this would be action in support of military intervention by the US.”

It actually is kinda surprising that Blair is allowed to go out there and say this, given that he was the number two guy responsible for the Iraq debacle.

They aren’t rolling out George Bush to talk about how we have to do this Syrian war.

Theresa is also on the prowl – also not a great record on these things.

Britain has left open the option of airstrikes in Syria.

Mrs May said on Monday that if President Bashar al Assad was found to be behind another chemical attack, “the regime and its backers, including Russia, must be held to account”.

Well, you already held Russia “to account” for something they didn’t do.

So maybe if you decide they did this, you can not hold them to account for it, since you already held them to account for a hoax.

Boy oh boy.

Sure is nutty.

US said Russia did election hacking, then had to admit they didn’t.

UK said Russia did poisoning, has effectively admitted they didn’t.

But this chemical gassing – which is exactly the same as the chemical gassing last year that turned out to be a hoax – this one is for sure the real deal.

No question.

As I’ve said: these people are living in 2003.

They do not understand the way the world has changed. The way we the people have changed.

This sort of thing just can’t sell anymore, because we don’t believe in anything anymore.

I wouldn’t be too concerned about the possibility of war with North Korea.

After all, there has never been a war in American history that was fought against a small and weak nation who Jews happen to dislike over resources or to upset the balance of power in a region.

Never once has the American government exaggerated another nation’s WMD capabilities to justify a war either, nor has a false flag ever been done by the CIA and Mossad in an attempt to frame another country.

There has also never been any war the US has been involved in that was just a war by proxy to anger another, stronger nation.

Nope, not once.

Nothing could possibly come from this.