Lindsay Graham and his beau John McCain spent an hour agitating for war with Russia on a Soviet-style CNN fake news Town Hall last week. The audience was stacked with the 1% of Americans who think we should start another Cold War with Russia over unproven allegations that they guessed the password to John Podesta’s e-mail, and McGraham was in their element.

At this event, there was Trump-bashing galore, accompanied by roaring applause, but also behavior like the above video that is weird in the context of these two.

The bizarre, often self-contradicting and fiendish cucking by both McCain and Graham points to more than just getting bribed. One look at Graham and you know this twinkly-eyed weirdo is some kind of sexual deviant. In the case of his Octogenarian partner McCain, any normal corrupt Washington scumbag would’ve retired by now.

If you just looked at Google Images of the two together, without knowing who they were, you would automatically assume they were a gay couple. This is self-evident. 

A slightly different but parallel precedent comes to mind with the case of the “Cambridge Five.” The Jew Arnold Deutsch was able to tap into the network of Cambridge homosexuals, and “compel” elite British queer like Sir Anthony Blunt and Guy Burgess into funneling documents and influencing policy for the benefit of the USSR. In the case of John Vassall, the KGB raised the specter of revealing his homosexual activity in order to bend him to their will. There are countless other cases, but the relationship between homosexuality and betrayal of country (either due to general mindset, or outright blackmail) is by no means arbitrary.

Still, there is nothing but circumstantial evidence against McCain. A few weeks ago I wrote about how John McCain’s former Chief of Staff, Mark Buse, is an award winning homo – odd for a Conservative in 2009. I also mentioned his bizarre and callous comments towards Ashton Kutcher’s sex appeal while the celebrity tried to get Congress to do something about child sex trafficking, his apparently homosexual daughter, as well as the self-admitted homosexual activity that went on in his POW camp in Vietnam.

John’s daughter Meghan is apparently a BBW dyke.

Now people have unearthed yet another thread from back in 2009, and in the game of “Six Degrees Of Kevin Bacon,” we can reduce it to one degree of John McCain when speaking of disgusting perverts. I give you Jeffrey Claude Bartleson, a man who was not in the GOP to any extent, yet was a manager in John McCain’s 2008 campaign, and was arrested for sexually abusing 5-year-old children.

This story was buried in 2009, but has recently been making the rounds.

Being a fag might hurt Lindsay Graham in Evangelical heavy South Carolina, but it’s not that taboo in Arizona. Rumors of John McCain being a gross sodomite and/or pedophile continue to mount. What other reason could there be for their obsessive anti-Republican pot-stirring and calls for suicidal wars?

There’s nothing wrong with loving a male friend, or waxing great words about him, but in the special case of McGraham, you can’t help but feel suspicion superstructured upon more suspicion.

Perhaps Donald Trump could take a lesson from Obama’s playbook and put wiretaps on these two, then release the intelligence through the Daily Stormer or Breitbart. Such an endeavor could finally retire these Jew sycophants for good.

The story of 6,000,000 Jews being randomly killed in gas chambers and ovens immediately rubs people as textbook war atrocity propaganda, a tall tale that would be shut down if ever exposed to objective and free scientific, archival and mathematical inquiry. In spite of this, enough people believe in the Holocaust myth to give it some weight in public discourse.

Why?

They look at Jennifer Rubin. Read Jennifer Rubin. Interact with Jennifer Rubin. “How could the Germans not want to exterminate these people,” asks the average man on the street.

That is one gassable face, no?

Jennifer Rubin is so sickening that even longtime Jew-appeaser John Derbyshire had a lapse in career-conservative discipline in his Goebbels-moment fighting back against one of her many public presentations.

I don’t like Bill O’Reilly, but his statement in the above clip that her Washington Post column is a fraud and that she is a liar is great; it shows he’s at least partially ready to call a Jew exactly what it is. Basically, Rubin is accusing him of sucking up to Trump in a feckless and dishonest way through her instruments of influence, yet, when confronted directly provides no proof because she’s a liar.

For all you recovering Conservatives who still use “liberal” (“liberal” media, “liberal” academia) as a euphemism for Jew, Jennifer Rubin is a “highly respected veteran conservative commentator” (just like fellow neocon Charles Krauthammer – it’s a mystery why they are on every single panel discussing Donald Trump in the press when nobody actually agrees with them).

Rubin grinds like we do at the Daily Stormer, publishing one article a day attacking Trump, calling for repercussions against the few people who give Trump a fair hearing, racially abusing White people. Here are some examples of what Jennifer Rubin has been writing.

The GOP has become a pity party for white males:

A cottage industry of apologists for Donald Trump and his supporters has sprung up to excuse, justify, infantilize and pity his core group of white, non-college-educated males who lash out at immigrants and globalism more generally. Victims ignored by elites! The Emmy winners mock them! There are more than a few problems with this.

First, conservatives used to stand up for “creative destruction,” the rise and fall of businesses and entire industries, which is an intrinsic part of a dynamic free market. If you’re not a hard-core Libertarian, the average conservative has considered the solution to this problem to be a safety net and tax, education and other policies that allow workers to rebound; it has never been to halt the marketplace or shift to a government-planned economy. The latter has been tried and has failed, as conservatives are quick to point out when ridiculing Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) or other anti-capitalist wags. It also exempts these voters from responsibility for their lives. The coal town is depopulated? Yes, that’s sad, but why are they not moving — as immigrants do — to where the jobs are?

Third, Trump’s defenders seem to demand that we treat members of his base delicately for fear of ruffling their feathers and damaging their self-esteem. When you play the “Hollywood makes fun of us” card, you get perilously close to political correctness and emotional feebleness, not things Trump and his ilk are supposed to promote. Even worse, complaining that other people don’t wish them “Merry Christmas” — and then transforming that into a war against Christianity — is victimology rarely seen outside the “safe spaces” on college campuses.

Fourth, the pity party for lower-class white males excludes virtually everyone else. Are we expected to turn the economy inside out for the latter, even to the extent that it harms those who have prepared themselves for a competitive workplace — or who simply want to enjoy moderately priced consumer goods not priced out of their grasp by tariffs? Why concern ourselves with the delicate sensibilities of the “Merry Christmas”-deprived and not with Mexican immigrants (“murderers”), women (Trump thinks it’s a mistake to let wives work outside the home), African Americans (whose lives he insists are a “disaster”), the disabled, etc.?

There is no virtue in pandering to Trumpkins at the expense of every other group and the country’s general prosperity. In making these white males (and only them) into victims and encouraging them to blame outsiders or menacing forces beyond their control, Trump does what Republicans used to accuse liberals of doing — pitting one group against another in a zero-sum conception of the economy. It is doing the Trumpkins no favors and it is heightening dissension in a country that needs to rediscover common values and shared endeavors and undertake some systemic reforms in government, education and criminal justice.

The GOP needs to wise up about immigration:

On the other hand, the Trump GOP could stay where it is with its sliver of a sliver of an aging electorate. The sane center-right — in the mold of the Gang of Eight and conservative independent Evan McMullin — could embrace responsible reform on this and a host of issues that are actually popular with voters and in accord with conservative principles. They stand to pick up many groups that have viewed the GOP as anti-immigrant and/or economically short-sighted. As the old white males who made up Trump’s base (and Fox News’s TV audience) literally die off over the ensuing decades, there will be insufficient numbers to stand on the hill of irrational and unpopular stances like immigration restrictionism. By then, however, the GOP could be long gone, which it will if it doesn’t wise up on this and a host of other issues.

Fox and the GOP need radical makeovers:

Fox News argues that it is a legitimate news organization and that Sean Hannity, among other nighttime hosts, is “entertainment.” (If so, he should not get the “Fox News” logo nor the accessories of a newsman, but let’s leave that for another day.) The unhinged non-news Hannity, who is widely seen as an adjunct to Donald Trump’s campaign — even going so far as appearing in a campaign ad for the GOP presidential nominee — now has attacked an actual news host, Megyn Kelly. He accuses her of being in Hillary Clinton’s camp. This is as obnoxious as it is false. The question, however, is now teed up for the Fox News execs: Is it a real news network that cares about the integrity of its news personnel or a caricature of right-wing media — in the thrall of know-nothingism, conspiracy-mongering and plain dishonesty?

Hannity’s behavior is so inappropriate that one has to wonder whether he is trying to get booted — or justify an upcoming post-election change. Nevertheless, the responsibility is Fox’s. If it cares about the reputations of quality news figures (e.g. Bret Baier, Chris Wallace, James Rosen) it will dump Hannity or relegate him to 21st Century Fox’s entertainment division. Fox cannot be both a serious outlet and tolerate Hannity’s attack on the integrity of its news people. The latter should be letting their bosses know in no uncertain terms: It is time to choose between the Fox News brand and the Hannity brand. The two are incompatible. 

Note: Chris Wallace and James Rosen, who she calls on to pressure Fox into firing the sole pro-Trump pundit on TV, Hannity, are both Jewish.

Jennifer Rubin’s been around long before Trump. To get an even more succinct glimpse into the mind of a psychotic, lying, hate-filled killer, Rubin has in the past endorsed a call to literally mass exterminate Palestinian women and children by tossing them “into the sea, to float there, food for sharks, stargazers, and whatever other oceanic carnivores god has put there for the purpose.”

She is a frantic defender of the Iraq War and continues to agitate for war against the “Axis of Evil” and Russia, supports the Wall Street bailouts, believes completely open borders and neo-liberal trade agreements are “vital” – I can go on and on.

Every single policy position she lobbies for is to the detriment of every single person in the world who isn’t a Jew!

Jennifer might act like a know-it-all, but she doesn’t know us that well. There are a lot more of us “pathetic, dying white males” than there are Jews. One day, if she keeps on pushing us, she’s going to get a booming knock on her door in the middle of the night with a deportation order to Israel. And when she gets there, we’re going to temporarily redirect military aid to the Palestinians so that they can strafe her and her family with F-15’s like they have been doing to them for the last 60 years.

To quote a time-resilient African proverb, “Talk Shit, Get Hit.” “Intellectual Conservative leaders” like Bret Stephens and Jennifer Rubin ought to heed that kind of wisdom, and pray to Satan that they’re able to stave off what comes from the broken levy that will follow a Trump victory.

Blood thirsty Jewish Neo-Con (redundant) and (((Never Trump))) activist Max Boot has written yet another article comparing Donald Trump to Hitler.  This time, he is bouncing the Hitler analogy off the recent Democratic party paramilitary bombing of an Orange County, North Carolina Trump campaign office, where instead of condemning the terrorist attack, he chides Donald Trump for condemning it.

The op-ed  is a glimpse into the demented mind of a Jew, and why no conservative will ever be able to keep up with these genetic bandits (Trump is not a conservative in the American cuckold sense). The first lesson to take from Boot is that Jews only respect the rule of law and democracy when they have a total grasp on it, once this begins to slip towards a more even share of power where the best ideas win, Jews will use their official positions and clout to support illegal activities that further their goals.

The second lesson is that Jews have no moral scruples about lying, killing or terrorizing political opposition if they see it fit – Jews are secretly cheering for the people who bombed the office, even if they have to say it in between the lines when they write for the general public.

The third lesson is that they are always on the attack, to the point that even when the Republican party of Trump is being subjected to political violence that has he will still blame people he perceives as having no right to a different opinion for it.

In the Los Angeles Times, he wrote “The Nazi Echoes In Trump’s Tweets”:

It goes without saying that Donald Trump is no Hitler — there is only one Hitler — and the firebombing of a Trump campaign office in Orange County, N.C., Saturday night was no Reichstag fire. But nevertheless there were some disturbing echoes of 1933 in Trump’s immediate response. He tweeted: “Animals representing Hillary Clinton and Dems in North Carolina just firebombed our office in Orange County because we are winning.”

There is so much wrong with that sentence it’s hard to know where to begin. In the first place Trump is not winning North Carolina — the Realclearpolitics average of polls has him down by 2.9 points. Second, you don’t refer to anyone — even arsonists — as “animals”; however deeply flawed, even criminal, they remain human beings. Third, and most importantly, there is no evidence to suggest that the arsonists were “representing” Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party.

Even if the attack was the work of local Democrats, it’s impossible to imagine that Clinton or the Democratic Party had anything to do with it. It’s just as likely to be a false-flag operation carried out by Trump’s alt-right supporters to implicate the Democrats. But Clinton rightly did not make any such allegation. All her Twitter feed said was: “The attack on the Orange County HQ ‪@NCGOP office is horrific and unacceptable. Very grateful that everyone is safe.”

This is a textbook example of the two-tiered dichotomy of the “official” press. Donald Trump is Hitler because he called the terrorists “animals,” meanwhile those who use violence to stifle an opinion they don’t like are the real mensches. While being indirect, Boot is also throwing out there that the bombing was a false flag by the Alt-Right (!), a line you should expect to gain traction if Jews are able to focus group it with any success.

While we know Hitler was the good guy, many others are indoctrinated against him, and constantly posed with the pestering, perturbed Hebrew-to-goy infanticide hypothesis: “Would you kill baby Hitler?”

The comparison of Trump to Hitler – and it’s no coincidence that it has been recklessly trotted out against other men Jews have ordered hits on (Saddam, Milosevic, Qaddaffi) – is meant to be inflammatory, it’s a thinly veiled green light to readers to commit acts of violence, even murder.  In modern Judeo-Merica, you can dress up as Satan, Bin Laden or Ted Bundy, but you will often run into trouble if you dress up as Hitler for Halloween – Hitler is worse than evil, though even this is dissipating as the methods and institutions who suppress the politically incorrect begin to wither away brick by brick .

Yet still, reading through Boot’s entire article, you will find not one condemnation of the actual act of bombing an opposing political party’s office, not even as an obligatory preface. The problem, Goyim, is you complaining about it.

Yet, all they’re doing with the Hitler analogy is showing people why Hitler said and did what he had to do. For the first time, with Trump, they might not be wrong in comparing him to Hitler: the masses are realizing they both stood for what’s right, and this is an epiphany the Judeo-Globalists will not be able to throw money at or swat down this time.

The clock is ticking…

Editor’s Note: I’ll just leave this here.

@MaxBoot

A new volunteer organization launching later this month called the “Hood Conservatives” says it plans to promote conservative political principles specifically to individuals residing in urban areas.

“I grew up and live in an urban area, in the hood – I’ve seen my friends and even family become trapped in a cycle of government dependence and broken family units,” founder Cecilia S. Johnson said. “I started Hood Conservatives because traditional values and conservative principles will assist these communities in establishing healthier and more prosperous lives.”

According to Johnson, the organization will “empower inner city voters through the conservative system” by focusing on five areas: Education, financial independence, rebuilding the family unit, entrepreneurship and gun education.

Read More