Last spring, about a dozen members of the domestic terrorist group “Jewish Defense League” jumped a Palestinian protesting the AIPAC convention in Washington DC. The evidence was so overwhelming that one of them just got indicted.

The question that comes up is: “where was Antifa?”

DC Antifa organizer Lacy MacAuley insists that her PC paramilitary protests AIPAC all the time. The only proof she provides is “google it yourself,” which doesn’t turn anything substantial up.

I have protested at #AIPAC conferences, and some friends organize those protests. Before you say "why don't you protest x?" #DoYourResearch

— Lacy MacAuley (@lacymacauley) August 5, 2017

As we can see in the footage above, the black-clad “militant” anarcucks waving improvised weapons – the ones that show-up whenever white people protest the war in Syria or march for Kate Steinle – are nowhere in sight.

The Forward:

A Canadian member of the Jewish Defense League was indicted by a grand jury in last week in Washington, D.C., for charges that include the assault on a Palestinian-American at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s annual conference in March.

Yosef Steynovitz faces three assault-related charges, the Canadian Jewish News reported, including attacking a man with a dangerous weapon and beating Kamal Nayfeh, a 55-year-old community college teacher who was reportedly walking to the conference when the attack happened. A photo of the bruised and bloodied face of Nayfeh circulated widely after the incident. At the time, JDL leader Meir Weinstein claimed videos and photos of the incident were incomplete and said his group was acting in self defense.

One of Steynovitz’s charges includes a hate crime enhancement for anti-Arab bias that would lead to a greater penalty if Steynovitz is convicted, the Jewish Telegraphic Agency reported.

This is rich, as the main justification for Antifas reactionary behavior is that white people will victimize “people of color” and queers if allowed to have some suit and tie conference in the Ronald Reagan building.

Yet at AIPAC, they don’t seem to be doing anything about a conference that exists specifically to keep earmarking billions of American taxpayer dollars for bombs and bullets that ethnically cleanse and murder Palestinian children.

When Arabs go to protest this, the Jewish Defense League assaults them while calling them racial slurs.

Now predictably, the average Antifa asshole would come up with an excuse like “we can’t be everywhere at once!”

Do you see any of the Antifas doxing JDL members? Do they get them fired from their jobs? Do they dox the people financing and leading Israel lobbies like AIPAC, the ADL or any of the scores of groups of this sort? No, because they mostly agree with these kikes.

The JDL and Antifa overlap a lot and have a similar philosophy. When the JDL was stronger in the 80s and 90s, Antifa/SHARP and JDL even had overlapping membership and the same goals (attacking David Irving and Ernst Zundel, fighting pro-white activists led by Tom Metzger, etc.).

They are predicated on the same Jewish criminal psychology and strategy: if you can’t win an intellectual debate because you’re wrong, physically assault the person who is right until he recants or is dead. When they refuse to let you do that, then play the victim.

Most people know that “Antifa” groups are anti-white and not “anti-racist.” Jewish racism and supremacy is allowed because a disproportionate number of Antifa organizers are Jews using the tactic (consciously or subconsciously) as a way to silence critics of Jews and Zionism.

If that’s the game they want to play, fine. My issue is these people are liars misrepresenting what they do.

Just admit you are a group that exists specifically to protect Jewish power and prevent white people from having a voice.

Drop the bandanna of “anti-racism” and show your real face to the world!

Alt-Light rube press likes to pretend the white privilege hate canard is an “identity politics” liberal thing, but it’s not, it’s a Jew thing!

People of all races are angry at what the Jews in the media, on Wall Street and who own our government are doing to our country. The way Jews deflect from themselves is by shifting the blame to middle class and poor white people who have no powerful allies or advocates. Blacks and other aggrieved groups are incited by “white privilege” theory (the idea that white people simply existing on earth is a form of non-white oppression) to help disenfranchise and sometimes kill us.

Now this trash is being peddled in “conservative” publications. Thankfully, nobody but Fairfax County DC bugmen read kikeshit like The Weekly Standard, but this Jew David Marcus (@BlueBoxDave) has a foothold in enough platforms (The Federalist, National Review, NY Times) to influence the way cuck media approaches anti-white politics on the whole.

If and when they succeed in turning the American internet into the heavily censored German internet (it’s already starting with the persecution of The Daily Stormer), checking your white privilege will be mainstream conservatism in a few short years.

The Weekly Standard:

Over the past two decades privilege theory has become the dominant theme in anti-racism education. In many ways it has become the only theme. White privilege is called upon to explain historical and current inequality, but also, crucially, as an antidote to inequality. During this time, privilege theory has been set against the traditional 20th century approach to anti-racism, loosely known as the colorblind model.

But, what if privilege theory and the color-blind model are not two concepts in stark opposition? What if each actually complements the other? What if engaging in both, simultaneously can open up new opportunities in anti-racism pedagogy?

In general, conservatives have taken a not-especially nuanced view of “white privilege.” First described by Peggy McIntosh in the late 1980s, white privilege basically describes somewhat hidden advantages that white people in our society enjoy, that they did not earn. It absolutely describes an actual phenomenon. Her most basic examples ring true. White people do see themselves represented more often in our culture and history, and rarely are the only person who looks the way they do in rooms where power exists.

…

Now, progressives arguing in good-faith might say that such a measure couldn’t work, because racism is not a matter of individual bias, but rather of systemic discrimination. But even if you grant the notion of systemic racism, we’d still be better off using the privilege model for diagnosis and the color-blind model as the cure.

Why? Because if racism is essentially systemic, and not a matter of individual bias, then surely, those of us who make an active choice to challenge our biases are in a better position to fix the systems.

What clearly emerges when we understand the advantages and limitations of privilege theory and the color-blind model is that, despite what we might assume, they complement each other. At a time when racial disharmony is so prevalent, we should look hard at the solutions offered by both progressives and conservatives.

This isn’t a war—at least it shouldn’t be. It should be a conversation.

Wow, how nuanced and open-minded!

Does the Jew Marcus want to have a nuanced conversation on how almost every White Privilege ideologue aside from Peggy McIntosh is a Jew?

Does the Jew Marcus want to have a nuanced conversation on how almost half of America’s billionaires are Jews?

Does the Jew Marcus want to have a nuanced conversation about the pernicious effect Jews have on our society through their overrepresentation in the media?

It’s easy to atone for the sins of another (especially when most of the crimes white people have committed are embellished fiction from Steven Spielberg movies), let’s have a conversation about Bolshevism, neo-liberalism, World War II, and Zionism. The competition for worst atrocity in modern history is as over the top as Wacky Races, except Jews are driving every vehicle!

We’re all ready to have a conversation about race and privilege My Fellow White/Aren’t You Jewish Dave. It’s your ilk that spends exorbitant amounts of money and concocts elaborate conspiracies to ensure it never happens.

The violently anti-white, Israel first fanatic Jennifer Rubin is at it again. This sexually ambiguous inbred arachnid spent all of 2016 demonizing white people as the Washington Post’s in-house “conservative” (!). Now she is terrified at what may be in store for 2018: cucks getting mass primary’d in a ballot box shoah!

To add some context, Jews like Jennifer Rubin have been pushing the narrative that a party that advocates for the white majority can never win. Trump proved that Rubin was lying, and now that she’s been found out she is telling her tribe’s loyal servants Mealy Mouth and Weasel Boy (McConnell and Ryan) to break away and found a new party.

She writes for Washington Post:

President Trump capitalized on unhinged anger that had been brewing for years on the right — among talk radio listeners and Fox News viewers, among anti-immigrant groups fanning fear of brown-skinned newcomers, among more “respectable” pundits spinning a tale that the “establishment” had betrayed “real” Americans. With Hillary Clinton there to generate a vicious Pavlovian response on the right, Trump squeaked by with some substantial help from Russians, who either fantastically understood the dynamic on the right or had some direction as to where to direct their social media messaging.

Like the proverbial dog that caught the bus, the GOP now finds it impossible to govern rationally with an irrational base and equally irrational media echo chamber.

…

In other words, if politicians and voters on the right and center-right want rational, productive governance, they need a new base of voters. That sounds strange. A party or section of a party that wants to fire its base? Well, that is precisely what happened in the 1960s, when the Democrats unloaded white Southern anti-integrationists, ceding the South to the GOP. It could do so because the population in the North and Midwest was growing, minorities were registering and voting in large numbers and previously non-voting or infrequent-voting segments of American electorate (e.g. the youth vote, legal immigrants) sided with Democrats.

…

Rather than pursue the fruitless effort to woo and persuade these voters, traditional Republicans should consider reverse-engineering their party. Their beliefs — support for free-market economics with a safety net; American leadership in the world; defense of institutions that restrain demagogic power and faith in government not to solve all problems, but to create conditions that solve some problems; support for civic virtues (empathy, civility, etc.) — may find a following among suburbanites, college-educated voters, immigrants, nontraditional families (who have been scorned by social conservatives), millennials, small-business people, workers in the New Economy and Democrats and independents resistant to that party’s tilt toward Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Western European-style democratic socialism. Maybe that’s enough to form a viable national party; perhaps it’s merely half of a new coalition with center-left, disaffected Democrats.

Does that sound a bit shaky, a proposition without a clear path to success? Indeed, but just as Democrats in the 1960s had to make the leap from the party of Southern segregationists to the party of civil rights, so, too, will Republicans who want rational governance reflective of their democratic ideals need to leave the party of Trump and find their own way in a chaotic political environment. If you cannot abide by the ethos that infuses a party’s base, you need to find a new base.

Let’s get one thing straight: the Republican party isn’t doing anything for anyone right now (except Israel). The problem the useless bellboys of Jewish plutocracy are having is Trump promised they would do their job and represent the people that voted for them. They can’t because their job is to destroy the people that elected them.

After Trump, Jews are in a mad rush to put the nail in the coffin of the white majority. Trump so far has been a graze, or even a warning shot regarding the anger brewing against their plan. The people are breathing down Trump and the GOP’s neck whenever they reach to scratch their neocon or amnesty itch…America is only one step away from seeing the Hebrew rash!

But talk is cheap, which is why Jews love it so much.

Jennifer Rubin knows full well that if Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell went on to form a new party, it would get less votes than The Rent Is Too Damn High Party. The GOP is a rotten institution with no future, its life support system is Trump, or more specifically, Trumpism. For the first time in many decades they are being pressured to consider making a compromise with – gasp – the people!

If you get the opportunity to primary Jeff Flake, Ben Sasse, Lindsay Graham, John Kasich or any other one of these anti-American traitors, do not miss your chance to. Get your entire family and all your friends to vote against them as a personal favor to you – it’s that important. Let’s throw as many of these bastards out of Congress and state government as possible.

Let them go join the Jennifer Rubin party!

CPAC hasn’t been covered too deeply on the Daily Stormer, probably because it is and always has been irrelevant.

The most important thing to take away from the event is the plasticity of conservatism and the type of submissive temperament attracted to its ideological orthodoxy (made up by Jews at think-tanks as they go along). Donald Trump – who was banned from the election year CPAC – gallantly returned with his conquering army of civic nationalist speakers, parsed into multiple events, most of them well-received. Trump’s message got an 86% approval rating in their famous straw poll, while the Jew David Marcus begged white people to keep the unwanted Bill Kristol in the tent.

Trump’s return was a wrecking ball, tearing down these conservative idols. He is scaling back interventionist  (((neo-conservativism))) and attacking the unthinking adherence to the principles of free trade globalism. These two ideological poles were made sacrosanct in the “conservative movement” during the rise of (((Barry Goldwater))) and later under Ronald Reagan, who in turn took his governing cues from Brent Bozell and William F. Buckley – or, more accurately – the Jewish money pulling their strings.

A lot of the loser mental pathways on the “Right” were burrowed in by these clowns. For example, Mr. Buckley was the first conservative to blame “liberalism” when Jews Jewliciously do Jewy things.

On the economic front, Trump has been steadfast in protecting the social safety net, promising decent jobs, and taking the side of working people as a moral imperative against the destructive weeds of internationalism.

A Washington Post contributor, Jennifer Burns, whose manjaw is almost as unappealing as her objectivism, isn’t happy.

Washington Post:

In electing Trump, the Republican base rejected laissez-faire economics in favor of economic nationalism. Full-fledged objectivism, the philosophy Rand invented, is an atheistic creed that calls for pure capitalism and a bare-bones government with no social spending on entitlement programs such as Social Security or Medicare. It’s never appeared on the national political scene without significant dilution. But there was plenty of diluted Rand on offer throughout the primary season: Marco Rubio, Rand Paul, Carly Fiorina and Ted Cruz all espoused traditional Republican nostrums about reducing the role of government to unleash American prosperity.

Yet none of this could match Trump’s full-throated roar to build a wall or his protectionist plans for American trade. In the general election, Trump sought out new voters and independents using arguments traditionally associated with Democrats: deploying the power of the state to protect workers and guarantee their livelihoods, even at the cost of trade agreements and long-standing international alliances. Trump’s economic promises electrified rural working-class voters the same way Bernie Sanders excited urban socialists. Where Rand’s influence has stood for years on the right for a hands-off approach to the economy, Trump’s “America first” platform contradicts this premise by assuming that government policies can and should deliberately shape economic growth, up to and including punishing specific corporations. Likewise, his promise to craft trade policy in support of the American worker is the exact opposite of Rand’s proclamation that “the essence of capitalism’s foreign policy is free trade.”

…

Now Rand is on the shelf, gathering dust with F.A. Hayek, Edmund Burke and other once-prominent conservative luminaries. It’s no longer possible to provoke the elders by going on about John Galt. Indeed, many of the elders have by now used Randian references to name their yachts, investment companies and foundations.

Instead, young insurgent conservatives talk about “race realism ,” argue that manipulated crime statistics mask growing social disorder and cast feminism as a plot against men. Instead of reading Rand, they take the “red pill”, indulging in an emergent internet counter-culture that reveals the principles of liberalism — rights, equality, tolerance — to be dangerous myths.

…

Mixed in with Rand’s vituperative attacks on government was a defense of the individual’s rights in the face of a powerful state. This single-minded focus could yield surprising alignments, such as Rand’s opposition to drug laws and her support of legal abortion. And although liberals have always loved to hate her, over the next four years, they may come to miss her defense of individual autonomy and liberty. Ayn Rand is dead. Long live Ayn Rand!

So how did Libertarianism become so popular and then die so easily in the first place?

Libertarians come in two varieties: people who aren’t actual libertarians but want a politically correct way to disengage from multiculturalism (you saw a lot of this in Ron Paul ’08), and emotionally stunted nerds who believe running a successful lemonade stand will buy them babes and respect. The first were easily won over by Trump, while the numerically inferior latter lodged a “protest vote” for Gary Johnson’s Marijuana Party.

Antifa have never attacked a Libertarian rally. That is because most people will never support actual unrestricted capitalism or hyper-individualism, including those who say “get your socialist hands off my Medicare.” It’s not hard for leftists to defeat these people in a political debate. When it comes to a battle of wits, the average Leftist is as disarmed as a New York City Quaker. The only people they can beat are comic book villains scripted to lose, like Paul Ryan. Now Judeo-Leftists have no recourse except to engage in violence to try and close the spigot of winning ideas (they’ll see where that takes them soon enough).

What Ms. Burns is lamenting here is that now real Republicans (that’s us) can win hearts and minds (and votes) by actually representing the majority. For the past 10 years, there have been a million reasons for white workers to vote against the GOP, which is why the Democrats kept getting votes from people they openly resent. Trump was able to demolish the “blue wall” in the Midwest because Trump met working and middle class white people half-way to full-circle.

As an aside about (((Rand))) herself, it’s true that she perceived Western countries as overgrown Las Vegas free for all lands of novelty where you should be allowed to shoot 7-Eleven heroin and publicly urinate while taking candy from a baby. That’s the depth and breadth of what her Weltanschauung – which has only been proven to succeed in her science fiction novels – amounts to.

But that didn’t stop Rand from spending the other half of her public career fanatically advocating for more American tax dollars to go to Israel: a racial collectivist nation that attacks individualism and has a planned, socialist economy.

Maybe, just maybe Jennifer, white people want respect and civic engagement in our countries too. Maybe we want our government to serve and protect its citizens. We built this land collectively, it’s time those Jews and plutocrats benefiting from what we achieved as a nation either show respect, or get the hell out.

Peter Blood:

The Neo-Reaction, in my opinion, has several characteristics that make it similar to Neo-Conservatism.

Neo-Cons: liberals, disproportionately Jewish, “mugged by reality”, not pro-white, eventually honeycombing the right and driving out old hard rightists (example, ironically, Paul Gottfried). Eventually everything is done for the Jews.

Neo-Reaction: libertarians, disproportionately Jewish (MY SUSPICION ONLY), “mugged by reality”, not pro-white (boy, they really hate blacks, though), To Be Determined….

It’s the “neo” thing. Irving Kristol: “Ever since I can remember I’ve been a Neo-Something.”

Hipster Racist:

Interesting parallel between the neo-cons and the neo-reaction. I remember back in the day the “neo” in “neo-con” was often noted to be practically synonymous with “judeo.”

I don’t even like the term “reactionary” to be honest – it’s a communist term. There’s the Marxist Revolution, than the Reaction from the bad guys (nationalists, capitalists, conservatives, religious, racists, etc.) I assumed that the “Dark Enlightenment” and “neo-reaction” were just labels slapped onto the emerging internet consensus among non-leftist types, a mix of race realism, sex realism, and scepticsm of utopianism. I prefer “Aryan Skynet” myself. The argument against democracy, for example, is intellectually interesting, and fun in a devil’s advocate sort of way, but 12 years after the Diebold Voting Machine scandal of 2002, kind of a moot point, isn’t it? Noam Chomsky from the Judeo-Left used to quote Walter Lippman about this in the 1990s, all about the “crisis of democracy” and the use of mass media to “manufacture consent.”

One thing I’ve noticed, YKWs have a lot of time on their hands to write all sorts of articles and comments. I can see a few enterprising YKWs doing what they have always done, as described by Kevin MacDonald, set up little cults-of-personality based on a guru and co-opt various intellectual trends into some “movement” or “ideology,” give it a catchy name, then ruthlessly purge the “anti-semites” and otherwise repurpose the movement to whatever benefits jews.

Indeed. The reaction is to judaization. Neo-reaction is the judaization of the reaction to judaization.