naz shah – DS

UK: She’s Back! Based Anti-Semite Shadow Minister Returns

Roy Batty — Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0000

Roy Batty
Daily Stormer
July 11, 2018

Finally, a UK politician that I can get behind reemerges from the shadows.

A Labour MP once suspended in a row over anti-Semitism has been made shadow equalities minister.

Naz Shah was stripped of the parliamentary whip and barred from party activity for three months in 2016 while an investigation was carried out.

It followed the unearthing of a 2014 Facebook post in which she shared a graphic of Israel’s outline superimposed on to a map of the US under the headline: Solution for Israel-Palestine Conflict – Relocate Israel into United States, with the comment: ‘Problem solved.’

That’s pretty tame.

And I’m actually not for that solution. We have enough Jews in America thank you very much, and I don’t really mind them killing Arabs, I just wish they didn’t involve us in their wars.

Y’all can duke it out all you want, we have enough Jews to deal with ourselves atm.

But wait, there’s more.

Naz Shah also waded into the Rotherham sex abuse scandal, sharing a post on Twitter last year that told victims to ‘shut their mouths for the good of diversity’.

Here is where things get confusing.

There are a lot of variables to consider. The first: White people use irony because they can’t ever say anything directly anymore because of low-T levels and Jewish programming…and they use irony to show off their IQ.

Non-Whites trying to integrate into SWPL white circles often imitate this behavior, but with mixed results. In general, brown people are too dumb to do the whole irony thing.

A report revealed that police had ignored the large scale exploitation undertaken by gangs of largely Pakistani-heritage men.

Ms Shah shared and liked the post by a parody account of left-wing newspaper columnist Owen Jones in light of

Yeah, it kind of trails off here ^^. I think that the author of this piece also got confused with the whole, “hol’ up is dis bitch supporting brown rape gangs or not” thing and just had a mental shutdown at the possibility of a brown woman advocating for brown men raping white women being given a position in the government.

Hire an editor, Daily Mail.

You gon’ get raped, white gurl

It said: ‘Those abused girls in Rotherham and elsewhere just need to shut their mouths. For the good of diversity.’

This is clearly sarcasm, right?

Days before, Ms Shah penned a comment piece for the Independent attacking fellow Labour MP Sarah Champion for writing an article stating ‘Britain had a problem with Pakistani men targeting vulnerable white girls’ in reference to an Asian sex grooming scandal in Newcastle that followed similar cases in Rotherham and Rochdale.

Holy shit.

It might not be.

I think this dumb, fat brown bitch actually thought that the whole, ‘those abused girls in Rotherham and elsewhere just need to shut their mouths. For the good of diversity” post was written unironically.

White people find themselves between a rock and a hard place don’t they?

You either have a bunch of pro-Israel dolts or vicious brown people who hate the kikes…but also hate White people.

Jew Admits Jewish Conspiracy

Andrew Anglin — Sat, 27 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0000

Diversity Macht Frei
August 27, 2016

One of the “classic antisemitic tropes” Jews like to complain about is that Jews act as a collectivity, not individuals, to pursue specific political goals, and that they do this in a deliberate, planned way, rather than spontaneously.

For example, when an “antisemitism” dossier was being compiled against Labour MP Naz Shah, the fact that she had said “The Jews are rallying” was considered evidence for the prosecution, as if the mere imputation that Jews could mobilise collectively to secure desired change could only be an expression of mad prejudice.

Here, however, writing in the Jewish Chronicle, prominent Jew “Lord” Daniel Finkelstein doesn’t seem to be in any doubt that Jews mobilise collectively in pursuit of political goals, or that they do so on the basis of strategy.

Finkelstein actually himself moots different strategies “the community” might choose to pursue, and deliberates on their likely effects. This sounds very much like one of the dictionary definitions of “conspiracy”:

any concurrence in action; combination in bringing about a given result.

Source

Finkelstein better take care, lest he give currency to those “classic antisemitic tropes”.

I want just to pause a second and ask if we are certain that our strategy towards Jeremy Corbyn is right.

… We are, I’m afraid, losing the battle. Conspiracy theories about Israel and thus about Jews have become a natural part of left discourse. And while our attempt to alert people to the problem has had some success, the problem is still growing.

… This provides us with two strategic alternatives. The first is to continue to pin the blame for the rise of antisemitism on Mr Corbyn. We attack his miserable failure to counter the problem, we make clear how his associations have made the problem worse, we draw attention to the Corbynite allegiance of those making antisemitic comments on social media.

This tells the truth, raises the profile of the issue and ensures that those on the left who do not support Mr Corbyn are made aware of the problem and become more determined to tackle it. This broadly is what we have been doing and there is a lot to be said for it.

But it has drawbacks. As any social psychologist will tell you, this approach also solidifies some Corbyn supporters in their antisemitism. It makes anti-Zionist conspiracy theories part of the group identity of the left. You can see it happen. Mr Corbyn numbers among his fans the strongest opponents of racism. Yet these very same people jeer when obvious examples of antisemitism are raised. They cannot accept that there is antisemitism because to do so is to accept criticism of themselves.

So an alternative strategy is to isolate people who make antisemitic comments and argue that they are letting down the Corbyn side. This would involve accepting the leader’s protestations that the problem is nothing to do with him and decoupling the idea of antisemitism from its association with Corbynism. This might well be more effective. At the same time, it is less obviously true, might be weak and will mean that the solid support we have been receiving from the other side of the Labour party might wane in enthusiasm.

Source

UK: Kike-Gasser Naz Shah Writes Apology to Jews in Haaretz

Andrew Anglin — Tue, 19 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0000

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
July 19, 2016

Woman, even 100% pure Jew soap can’t fix those skin problems. You’d best just give up on that dream

The fat terrorist Naz Shah, who was once celebrated by the Daily Stormer despite her racial inferiority and desire to blow-up buses because she was calling for the total extermination of Jews, has groveled and apologized.

She wrote an article for the Israeli-Jew paper Haaretz, which reads in part:

I have campaigned for race and gender equality all my life. But I realized I had so little understanding of modern anti-Semitism that I had hurt and offended Jewish people.

Just over a year ago, against all the odds, I won my Parliamentary seat in Bradford West in the North of England from the divisive candidate George Galloway. Never did I imagine that I would soon be at the center of an international anti-Semitism story.

When it happened, I wasn’t worried about the media storm, or even my career – what really worried me was knowing I’ve offended people and that I must do the right thing and apologize. I took a long hard look at myself and asked if I – who has campaigned for equality of race and gender my whole life – have so little understanding of modern anti-Semitism that I had hurt and offended Jewish people.

In my first apology (published before my suspension from the UK Labour Party), I made sure it was just that – an apology. I didn’t mention that I already had a meeting scheduled with the All Party Parliamentary Group on British Jews, or that I’d been asked to join the UK Parliamentary group for British Jews. I didn’t talk about my history of work with – not against – the Jewish Leadership Council, or about how I felt my own people – the Muslim community – could learn from Britain’s Jews, who have integrated successfully without losing their identity.

I didn’t even tell people about my (already scheduled) visit to Auschwitz to learn more about the Shoah and its legacy today.

Ouch.

I wonder how long it will be before people start thinking it’s funny that everyone who ever hurts the feelings of Jews is forced to visit Auschwitz as part of their apology tour?

The obvious implication is “you can’t say anything bad about us because that will lead to our extermination.”

But that isn’t really logical, is it?

I mean. If you say the word “nigger,” they don’t make you visit the slavery museum as part of your apology. Nor do they suggest that you’re planning to re-enslave the Blacks.

Blood Libel is Back! And This Time It’s Not Little Kids

Andrew Anglin — Sun, 08 May 2016 00:00:00 +0000

Al. B. On
The Right Stuff
May 8, 2016

Everyone who is anyone in British politics is freaking out. The reason? The Labour Party is in a “state of crisis” over “anti-Semitism” from one of its MPs and veteran socialist former Mayor of London, Ken Livingstone. It must be true. David Cameron said so.

First, what exactly was said? Not really that important, but one Muslim (no surprise there) Labour backbencher once said something mean and hurtful about our beloved Israel on Facebook, and Ken Livingstone has defended her. However, he went further. In an interview, while drawing the distinction between anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism, he made a compelling case for the proposition that Hitler was in fact a kind of Zionist himself in that he wanted the Chosen out of Europe. Hitler circa 1932 preferred to ship them to Israel, rather than oven six million of them. He then “went mad” and tried to kill them instead. This version of events is one supported by the Prime Minister of Israel. But if a goy says it, oy vey!

For the avoidance of doubt, Naz Shah and Ken Livingstone are scum. They are socialists and cultural leftists. But they have one redeeming feature: they oppose the Evil Empire that is the United States, they oppose big corporations, and they are brave enough to stand up to the Israel lobby. Mr Livingstone has been doing it for rather longer than Miss Shah, and so he understandably did not back down.

But this is, as the equally brave George Galloway has said, part of a (Jewish) coup to remove Jeremy Corbyn and his far-left, anti-American, anti-neoconservative faction from the Labour leadership. There is already talk of Margaret Hodge (Jewish) acting as a “stalking horse” candidate to begin a leadership election following disappointing local election results.

People do not yet realise just how much of an anomaly the September 2015 Labour leadership election was. It was not meant to happen. “Democracy” has always been a legitimising ideology, never something the Political Class has willingly put in practice. The election of Corbyn last September was truly spectacular, and resulted from an ill-thought out change in the Labour Party constitution by Ed Miliband, thus allowing the election of an outsider for the first time since the 1980s.

What do I mean by an outsider? Yes, Corbyn is a socialist, a cultural leftist, but not necessarily a Marxist. He is what you would call a “Bennite”, i.e. a follower of Tony Benn. Tony Benn was fiercely patriotic and a believer in Parliament, and a long-time anti-war campaigner. His brand of socialism grew out of the 19th-century Methodist social reformers of the Industrial Revolution. He once said, “My socialism owes more to Jesus Christ than Karl Marx.”

Jeremy Corbyn and his faction are heirs to what Corbyn’s ally John McDonnell calls the “British Socialist” Tradition. They are not in the same league of political trash as Tony Blair, and more recently, Liz Kendall, who was the Blairite candidate last September in the leadership election. She is very Jewish and very vocal about it.

Since members of Corbyn’s faction are not friends of Israel, I thought to myself last September that Corbyn would last three months before a coup. He has lasted to May. He won’t last much longer.

On the 27th April the vultures began to circle, with Labour “lords”, such as Lord Levy, inventing the problem of anti-Semitism within the Labour Party. No doubt then they began to scour the internet for vaguely anti-Israel stuff posted by Corbyn’s supporters. After being called a “Nazi”, On 28th April, Ken Livingstone was suspended from the party by Corbyn in an attempt to show his “concern”, clearly fearful for his position. Blood libel is well and truly back, only this time the victims aren’t young children, but high ranking, respected politicians who step out of line.

Speaking of the internet, my own Facebook feed is full of conservatives and libertarians eagerly denouncing the Labour Party for its “problem with anti-Semitism.” The glee with which so-called “cultural libertarians”, i.e. supposed defenders of all speech, however offensive, and writers for so-called ‘anti-establishment’ conservative sites such as the “free speech” organisation ‘Spiked’ and Breitbart London denounce Corbyn shows just how pervasive Jewish influence in my country’s politics really is. I am waiting with baited breath for the cultural libertarian defence of Ken Livingstone…

Oh, to be sure, these people are happy to be “offensive.” They are happy to insult trannies, blacks, and, of course, Muslims. They love taking the SJWs to task, and showing how the current generation is ruining the wonderful West with their silly safe spaces and their micro-aggression nonsense. Except, you see, the West is already ruined. And the Jews have played a bigger part in that than the Muslims.

Jews have been pulling the strings in British politics for a long time. As far back as the 19th century, we had one as our Prime Minister. Benjamin Disraeli was an early example of a Jewish entryist in British politics. At a young age, eager to get ahead, he stopped practicing his religion, and spent every waking hour trying to infiltrate the upper echelons of British society. He succeeded, occasionally receiving the odd adverse, albeit good-natured and funny, comment about his ethnicity. (Apparently at one dinner party, an old Englishman shoved pork under his nose with the ever-so-witty adlib, “Pork for the Jew!”)

Disraeli continued and having made a good marriage was eventually elected to the House of Commons. In politics, he behaved as Jews are wont to do today. At first, he was laughed at after a ridiculously pretentious maiden speech in the chamber. But soon enough, he was jumping on bandwagons, and then hijacking them, with one example of this being the Great Reforms of the 19th century. At first keen to present himself as an English gentleman, he opposed the expansion of the franchise. When the country seemed ready for it, he became its most enthusiastic proponent. No longer was Disraeli one of the gentry, now he was one of the people!

Another example of such Jewish entryism is that of the Goldsmith family. Zac Goldsmith MP is currently on course to lose the London Mayoral election to Sadiq Khan, a Muslim. Many outside London are aghast that a Muslim could be elected Mayor of London. Fine, but why is it OK to elect a Jew?

I could go on. I could mention Winston Churchill and his Zionism. I could mention how Jews like Sir Keith Joseph very much “created” Margaret Thatcher. Or I could go on for hours about the real power behind Tony Blair.

But I don’t see the point. Most of you will be familiar with the situation in America, where Jews decide your foreign policy and much else. You know that Jews are the power elite.

What so many are yet to realise, or to fully appreciate, is the extent to which they control almost every political movement in my country. When I said that Jewish influence on British politics is pervasive, I meant it. The current anti-Zionist Labour Party leader is a dead man walking. ‘Conservative Friends of Israel’ is a major Conservative Party funder.
UKIP panders to the Jews, with Nigel Farage giving long interviews to the Jewish Chronicle, for example, specifying that Halal slaughterhouses should be banned, but Kosher ones left alone. Farage took over a largely paleoconservative party and so has had an understandably schizophrenic attitude to the question of war with Iran to “protect Israel”, sometimes for it, sometimes against. And of course, Farage loves his trips to the United States, where he appears on all the neoconservative talk shows, talks about “our Judaeo-Christian heritage”, and where he bangs on about the Special Relationship and the problem of the Muslims.

Smaller parties like the ‘Counter-Jihad’ party “Liberty GB” are also Jewish outfits, with the Outreach Officer of said party being of Jewish descent and their Leader photographed wearing a kippah. This party is linked to PEGIDA UK, which celebrates diversity, with Pakistani and Israeli flags flown at its marches. Their only problem is Islam.

But all this is formal politics. Of course we should expect this to be the case in formal politics.

Surely, though, the non-mainstream, anti-establishment Right, is different. Well, what I find concerning is the growing fan-base among young right-wing men of Milo Yiannopoulos. Yiannopoulos is a “cultural libertarian” and spends his time talking about feminism and trannies. His meteoric rise has seen even some members of the Alt-Right fall head over heels in love with him.
Now, granted, he makes some points quite well. But he is a homosexual and he is of Jewish descent, even referring to himself as a Jew when it suits him. Interestingly, if you look at the Wikipedia edit history on his page, it is quite obvious that his adoring fans are keen to remove any mention of his Jewish mother, instead describing Yiannopoulos as “Roman Catholic”–not a very good one if he enjoys being sodomised by black men, as he repeatedly tells us. Yiannopoulos’ hair is also naturally black, not blonde, yet he is desperate to look Aryan, just as Disraeli was desperate to fit in with all the old country gents and lords of the manor.

Again, similar to Disraeli, Yiannopoulos is an opportunist. He jumps from one project to another, doing anything for attention and praise. Most recently, an article has appeared on Breitbart under his name (which he did not write, since he has at least two ghost-writers for his Breitbart articles, so he isn’t even a good fraud) which purports to explain what the Alt-Right is. “His” tone throughout is patronising, describing the Alt-Right as little more than “mischievous” and telling us (just to stop us from having impure thoughts) that what they say about the Jews is “not edifying.” Oh, anything you say, Milo! We promise not to step out of line again!

Regarding his homosexuality, don’t get me wrong, some of our best people are gay. One thinks of Justin Raimondo of Anti-War.Com, for instance. However, the difference between Yiannopoulos and Raimondo is that, unless you had a fine-tuned “gaydar”, you would never be able to tell that Raimondo was gay. Yiannopoulos can’t stop talking about it. Once we accept people like that into our movements, the movement implicitly accepts homosexuality as normal. And that is not OK. One of the many reasons why, on present trends, the West is lost, is because too many of our young men are effeminate, unable (or unwilling) to attract women, and not concerned in the slightest about raising white Christian children (something that gays won’t do and Jews don’t want us to do).

Yiannopoulos’ group interests may overlap with our own. As a homosexual, he may be opposed to feminism, but only because he is a woman-hater. As a Jew, he may be opposed to Muslim immigration and happy to make some quite frankly ridiculous comments about Muslims, but only because Arabs and Israelis don’t exactly get along. While presenting himself as a “Roman Catholic”, he retains his Jewish identity, as do most Jews. He may criticise the BBC, but only when its reporters don’t pander to Israel.
Some progress (of sorts) is being made, however. The new President of the National Union of Students is a leftist half-caste Muslim who refuses to back down on comments she has made about the Zionist media. The Labour Party’s membership has swollen by hundreds of thousands, and they are all young, anti-American and anti-Zionist leftists. With any luck, the Labour Party will destroy itself in the coming civil war. The British Left is about to commit fratricide.

Significantly, all this is happening at the same time as a Conservative civil war is raging, with the ultra-neoconservatives like Michael Gove, Michael Howard (Jewish), and Boris Johnson wanting to leave the EU and become the 53rd state of the United States after Israel and Saudi Arabia. This fratricide in both the Conservative and Labour Parties at the same time is a truly historic opportunity. If the work is put in by the right people, the result may well be a new, stronger coalition in British politics, opposed to Zionism and American Imperialism, and independent of Jewish and American funding. But with so many cucks on the British Right worshipping a very “dangerous faggot” indeed, don’t be surprised if that essential coalition is made up almost entirely of hacked-off hard leftists.

Jew Admits Board of Deputies Behind Plot to Unseat Corbyn with Fake Antisemitism Scandal

Andrew Anglin — Sat, 30 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0000

Diversity Macht Frei
April 30, 2016

The extent of the divide within Labour was highlighted when David Rosenberg, an ally of Mr Corbyn and co-founder of Jews for Jeremy, said that the Board of Deputies was “part of the problem, not part of the solution”.

Writing in the latest edition of Labour Briefing, a monthly magazine of the hard left, Mr Rosenberg suggested that those on the right of the party and other groups were using antisemitism claims to attack Mr Corbyn, and that the Board of Deputies was part of that.

He wrote: “The Board of Deputies, which falsely claims to be the ‘representative’ body of British Jews, has waded in too. Jonathan Arkush, its president, told The Standard that the ‘Jewish community could not trust Labour any more’.

In truth the targets are both Corbyn and Palestine. The ardently pro-Zionist Board of Deputies, in particular, is using the Palestine issue to play party politics.”

Source (£)

A Jewish donor to Labour has also been calling for him to resign.

David Abrahams, who has given more than £600,000 to the party but has now halted his funding, said that he could no longer remain silent and called for Mr Corbyn to step down.

“We’ve got to have a fresh start — we need proper policies and not arguing, backbiting and backstabbing,” he said. “We need to review the leadership, without a shadow of a doubt. We need a leadership built to set an example from the top. I think it is time now for Corbyn to review his situation. I’m just not inclined to be part of this pantomime. It’s time [for MPs to speak out] after next week’s local elections.”

Source (£)

Last night, Mr Abrahams said that it was time for Mr Corbyn to step down. “Jewish people don’t even like the name Labour mentioned at this time,” he told Channel 4 News.

Source

Notice how he is allowed to acknowledge the phenomenon of Jewish ethno-political action as a collectivity. But when Naz Shah says “The Jews are rallying” it’s considered “antisemitism”.

This pseudo-scandal is a good illustration of Jewish power in action. All of the tribe members in the media move into action in pursuit of a common agenda, an agenda that has nothing to do with the country they live in. This manufactured “crisis” had nothing to do with antisemitism to begin with; but it will certainly provoke antisemitism as millions of Corbyn supporters see their hopes for change cheated by an alien power living among them.

Corbin’s Party Stuck in Massive Jew-Hate Crisis!

Andrew Anglin — Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0000

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
April 28, 2016

What the hell is this?

Trouble in Marxist multi-racial worker’s paradise!

The Islamics that the Jews brought into Britain are attacking Jews for mass-murdering the Islamics!

Wow – Just wow!

The Telegraph:

Today the Labour party was in trouble over remarks one of its MPs, Naz Shah, made online in 2014 about Israel and Jews. Journalists asked a spokesman for Jeremy Corbyn whether Mrs Shah was anti-Semitic.

“We’re not suggesting she’s anti-Semitic,” said the spokesman. “We’re saying she’s made remarks that she doesn’t agree with.”

To repeat. She’s made remarks… that she doesn’t agree with.

Yes, people do that.

For example, I do it constantly.

I’m all like: “guys I don’t really want to gas the kikes, haha, that’s just a humorous joke, hahaha.”

At Prime Minister’s Questions, David Cameron demanded to know why Jeremy Corbyn had done nothing to discipline Mrs Shah. Shouldn’t he be listening to his shadow chancellor, John McDonnell, who in March had said that if anyone in Labour expressed anti-Semitic views then “full stop, they’re out”?

Standing behind the Speaker’s chair, Mr McDonnell was out of most MPs’ sight. But I unmistakably saw him nod.

After PMQs, pressure continued to mount. Journalists asked Mr Corbyn’s spokesman to confirm that the Labour leader had the authority to dismiss Mrs Shah as a party whip. “Of course, he’s the leader,” said the spokesman. “Having met with her, he’s chosen not to.”

News of this decision did not meet with universal acclaim. Desperately, Mrs Shah had a go at apologising to MPs in the Commons. “I fully acknowledge I have made mistakes,” she said, “and I wholeheartedly apologise for the words I used… I truly regret what I did…”

Will sorry bring gassed Jews back from the dead, bitch?

No, I think not.

Something more must be done.

It wasn’t enough. An hour later, Labour announced that she was suspended from the party. “Jeremy Corbyn and Naz Shah,” said a statement, “have mutually agreed that she is administratively suspended from the Labour Party by the general secretary.”

Look at the wording of that. The party leader, who decided that Mrs Shah should face no consequences, agrees that she’s subsequently been suspended by someone else.

I wonder how Labour members feel now, when they look back at last September’s leadership election. Are any of them beginning to worry that they did something they don’t agree with?

We have to do something about this problem of Moslems not liking Jews.

Probably, they just need more education on how Israel is a democracy.

By the way, the only post I’ve seen is where she is calling for Israel to relocate to the US.

Apparently, she’s not aware we already have an Israel in the US – it’s called “New York City.”

Naz Shah was earlier this year involved in the “British” conspiracy to thwart Donald Trump.