It’s shocking that German patriots are still able to pull something like this off in Mama Merkel’s Worker’s Paradise.

We don’t really have the ability to organize something like this in America.

But it’s nice to see Germans able to do it.

AFP:

Hundreds of neo-Nazis were massing Friday on Adolf Hitler’s birthday for a two-day festival in a remote eastern German town where citizens and anti-fascist groups staged spirited counter-protests.

Many of the mostly male right-wing extremists wore T-shirts with slogans such as “Keepers of the Race”, “White is my favourite colour” and “Adolf was the best” while the event was guarded by a group called “Aryan Brotherhood”.

Hundreds of armoured police ringed the site of the “Schild und Schwert” (Shield and Sword, or SS) festival near the Polish and Czech borders that was expected to also attract eastern European extremists.

Police were backed by water cannon and armoured vehicles, mounted patrols and boats patrolling the Neisse border river, on the western banks of which the shaven-headed and often heavily tattooed attendees were pitching their tents or parking camper-vans.

Organisers argue that the “Reconquista Europa” festival — featuring far-right music, speeches, martial arts, a tattoo convention and merchandise stalls — is a political event, granting it legal protection under the German constitution.

They said they expected about 1,000 participants.

The event comes as Germany, after a mass influx of asylum seekers since 2015, is witnessing a revival of far-right and ultra-nationalist groups and has seen the anti-immigration Alternative for Germany (AfD) enter parliament.

…

“Facism is not an opinion , it’s a crime,” said an organiser of another gathering, Mirko Schultze, 50, who is also a Saxony state politician of the far-left Die Linke party.

I believe that what you are saying is that it is both an opinion and a crime.

Because it is definitely an opinion. Criminalizing an opinion does not change the fundamental nature of language and ideas.

“This is a meeting of the European extreme right,” he said. “We’re trying to occupy the public space around the hotel site to make clear that we defend democracy here, because otherwise Ostritz will become their new meeting ground.”

…

While neo-Nazis have long staged underground concerts for recruiting and fund-raising, a major two-day music festival with a tent city and tickets selling at up to 45 euros ($55) is seen as an escalation of an emboldened far-right movement.

The Shield and Sword lineup features bands linked to the far-right and hooligan scene as well as a “fight night” event Saturday called “Kampf der Nibelungen”, a reference from Germanic and Norse mythology, featuring boxing, kickboxing and mixed martial arts.

“To live is to fight,” declares the event website. “At all times it was fighters who defended their clan, their tribe, their homeland.”

Good.

Germans with balls, brings a tear to my eye.

Visitors were prohibited from bringing glass bottles, flag staffs and certain breeds of dogs.

YES.

The Daily Stormer’s PITT GENOCIDE campaign is gaining traction internationally.

The SS festival organiser is Thorsten Heise of the far-right fringe party NPD, which is openly xenophobic and anti-Semitic.

Heise led journalists on a police-guarded tour of the ramshackle compound, a hotel and former industrial textile factory that closed soon after the 1989 fall of the Berlin Wall and later suffered river flood damage.

A far-right merchandise sales man who identified himself as Tommy, 31, and wore a t-shirt with the slogan “HTLR SCHNTZL”, said Germany’s biggest problem was “the uncontrolled influx of foreigners into our homeland”.

Yeah.

And we all know who’s behind that.

Our Uncle warned us.

Whatever people think of Hitler, he is a part of German history. He was a great man, who did great things – you can admit that even if you believe the idiot Jew nonsense about homicidal gas chambers.

There is never any reason to deny your history.

Russia admits that Stalin committed atrocities, and yet they honor him as a part of their national history.

The idea that Hitler was uniquely “evil” is nonsensical. Every leader does good and bad things. And I think even most Jews would have to admit that if Hitler did kill the Jews as they claim, he did it because he thought it was the right thing to do, not because he was consciously evil and just wanted to do evil things.

There has been a sustained, nonstop assault on DS ever since we suggested the Alt-Right should present itself more explicitly as American Nationalist – as the only movement who has the true interests of white Americans at heart – by those who are opposed to such a stance.

Everything has seemingly fallen into place for this to be the next logical step: We became famous for a rally that, despite its setbacks, showed us to be the only ones with the courage to stand up against the toppling of our national monuments. At the same time the country has become, and continues to become, increasingly racially polarized.

Black football players take a knee to spite our National Anthem, our President is called a “Nazi” and a “racist” constantly and the Jews and their allies are now overtly attacking America as an inherently white supremacist nation.

The fact that even after 6 months we have been crippled in this strategy not by the left, but by those who are ostensibly on our side, has been quite a shocking thing to behold, to say the least.

If anything, it has brought to the surface the inherent folly of a “big tent” strategy, which may ultimately be a positive in the long term, despite the inescapable growing pains. Better for the fallout to come now rather than later, I suppose.

Many (but not all) critics of the American Nationalist stance seem to think that presenting ourselves as anything less than unironic, hardcore National Socialists is somehow a form of cucking.

It’s true, of course, that ever since WWII any time a white person has advocated for their own interests they have been roundly smeared as a “Nazi,” and that this has been a frighteningly effective way of silencing any and all opposition to the anti-white system.

For this reason, it was necessary to neutralize this tactic of our enemies. The Alt-Right accomplished this, brilliantly, through the use of ironic and semi-ironic Nazism, trolling, and refusing to go on the defensive.

Thanks to the far-reaching and tireless spreading of edgy, educational memes and Alt-Right internet culture in general – which Daily Stormer has played, and will continue to play, a large role in – young white males have been thoroughly desensitized to the stigma attached to the “Nazi” label.

Now that this taboo is broken, and we have forced the world to take notice of us and the “Alt-Right” is a household name, it just makes sense to change tack in order to broaden our outreach – to move into a more serious, but still fun, “phase two,” if you will.

This is quite similar to what the founder of white nationalism himself, George Lincoln Rockwell, had been doing in his time. He used Nazi imagery and shock tactics to make himself irresistible to the media, who otherwise just ignored him. This made him a household name, but was only “phase one” of a clearly laid out four phase plan (which in hindsight was not without its flaws, to be sure).

Shortly before he was assassinated, he moved into “phase two.” This entailed dropping the Nazi uniform, changing the name of his party from the American Nazi Party to the National Socialist’s White People’s Party and using the fame and attention he had acquired to educate the public on the plight of the white race in America.

Dr. William Pierce, who was the editor of Rockwell’s journal, only formally joined the party after the name change. Following Rockwell’s untimely death, Pierce still wanted to move forward with the more serious “phase two” strategy, but the movement instead rapidly reverted back to the “Hollywood Nazi” type approach, causing him to split.

He later said of Matt Koehl, who ended up being Rockwell’s successor:

Koehl was an admirable guy in some ways. For one thing, he was very reliable–but he wasn’t very imaginative. To figure out what to do he would take out Mein Kampf or see how Hitler did it in 1928. I said, ‘Jesus, Matt, we’ve got a different situation now.’

After the split, and shortly before the official founding of the “National Alliance” – by far the most successful American white nationalist organization in history – Pierce wrote the essay “Prospectus for a National Front” (1970), in which he advocated for a more American-tailored approach and advised against “isolating ourselves from the public with programs and images so radical that only a small fraction of one percent will respond.”

He said to his biographer, Robert Griffin, about this change in direction:

I was certain there were many people around who didn’t think of themselves as National Socialists who were concerned about the same degenerative trends in politics and demographics as I was, and I wanted to find them.

By 1967 Rockwell had dropped the Nazi outfit and was wearing a suit.

That many white racialists become enamored with National Socialism is quite understandable. We all get redpilled on the state of the world, we see the Jews ruling over us and how our race is being destroyed, and then it dawns on us that Hitler was openly fighting against it.

What this has resulted in is a thread of thought in the Alt-Right, and the White Nationalist community in general, that Germany was the one country to stand up to the Jews, and that the rest of our people and nations were completely enslaved to them, even back then.

This is a very simplified, and in my view poisonous, view of an extremely complex history. First off, it must be kept in mind that what brought the Nazis to power was a unique set of historical circumstances that just weren’t present in America or elsewhere.

Germany had been defeated in WWI and were humiliated and crushed by the Versailles Treaty, genocidal, Godless communism was at their doorstep and Jewish power and subversion was much further advanced and entrenched there than anywhere else.

America back then was still a traditional, wholesome white society. Degeneracy was outlawed pretty much across the board, Jews were looked down upon and blacks, who were our primary racial problem, were more or less kept in check.

So, while our ideology does indeed parallel that of the Nazis in many ways, it isn’t necessarily more German or National Socialist than it is American.

Non-whites used to be seen as a source of lulz for American whites, not as real people.

Hitler had many great ideas – but not many of them were particularly original. Race and eugenics, for instance, were mainstream, accepted science at that time.

Of the most influential early racial thinkers, really only one was a German: Ernst Haeckel.

The rest were French (de Gobineau), British (Chamberlain, Galton, Darwin) and, most of all, American (Grant, Ripley, Davenport, Stoddard, Goddard, Walker).

Hitler, and the Nazis in general, were heavily influenced by certain American personalities and American racial laws.

Alfred Rosenberg, in his The Myth of the 20th Century – probably the second most influential ideological book of the Third Reich, next to Mein Kampf – wrote this:

The United states of America, according to the universal agreement of all travellers, is the magnificent land of the future. It has the great task of throwing aside all outworn ideas which date from before its foundation. It can proceed with youthful strength to set up the new idea of the racial state, such as some awakened Americans have already apprehended, like Grant and Stoddard.

They saw the necessity for the expulsion and resettlement of the Blacks and the Yellow men, the handing over of east Asiatic possessions to Japan, the working toward a Black colonisation in central Africa, and the resettlement of the Jews to a region where this entire group can find a place.

The Nazi writer Albrecht Wirth, in a 1934 book designed to teach Germans global history through a racial lens, Völkisch World History, wrote the following:

The most important event in the history of the states of the Second Millennium—up until the [First World] War—was the founding of the United States of America. The struggle of the Aryans for world domination received thereby its strongest prop.

A second book of the same nature, The Supremacy of the White Race, written by Wahrhold Drascher in 1936 called America “the [leader] of the white peoples” and said its Founding was “the first fateful turning point” in the struggle for global White Supremacy. “[A] conscious unity of the white race” would have never emerged without it, Drascher contended.

Comments such as these among the Nazis are countless. Hitler himself, though very critical of America at times as well, had much praise for and drew much inspiration from America in regard to his racial views and policies. He writes explicitly of the 1924 Immigration Act in Mein Kampf:

At present there exists one State which manifests at least some modest attempts that show a better appreciation of how things ought to be done in this matter. It is not, however, in our model German Republic but in the U.S.A. that efforts are made to conform at least partly to the counsels of commonsense. By refusing immigrants to enter there if they are in a bad state of health, and by excluding certain races from the right to become naturalized as citizens, they have begun to introduce principles similar to those on which we wish to ground the People’s State.

In his unpublished second book, Hitler commended America for rejecting the Jewish “Melting Pot” idea and shifting immigration policy so that the majority taken in were Northern Europeans, the original founding stock.

The 1924 Immigration Act, also known as the “National Origins Act” or the “Johnson-Reed Act,” was explicitly pro-white – and implicitly anti-Jewish – legislation. It passed in the House by a vote of 308 to 62, and in the Senate 69 to 9.

During the run up to the passing of the bill, Madison Grant, who was the main driving force behind it and the most influential racial author of the time, said to then sitting President, Howard Taft:

vast floods of utterly alien races and types are pouring in, and the great cities are being swamped by the Polish Jews from Eastern Europe. Anyone who scientifically faces the facts can understand the extremely inferior and immoral structure of these latter, and it is universally admitted and deplored in private conversation.

Grant said that the influx of Eastern European Jews was “by far the most serious immigration matter that now confronts us” and that the Act was “the only chance of our life time to shut out the Jews. It is now or never.”

Hitler called Madison Grant’s The Passing of the Great Race his “bible.”

US foreign service officials, according to Jonathan Spiro’s biography of Grant, warned that the Jews were “filthy and ignorant and the majority are verminous”; that they were “abnormally twisted, . . . un-American, and often dangerous in their habits”; and that they were a “thoroughly undesirable” class of immigrant and unquestionably “unassimilable.”

Burton J. Hendrick publicly admitted in 1923 that the Emergency Quota Act of 1921 was “chiefly intended—it is just as well to be frank about the matter—to restrict the entrance of Jews from eastern Europe.”

Albert Johnson, one of two main architects of the Act, brought State Department cables before the Senate Immigration Committee which warned that the Jews preparing to sail to America were “evasive, dishonest, and . . . do not have the moral qualifications for American citizenship.”

Spiro continues:

Johnson read aloud to the House fresh consular cables provided by the State Department, warning that the majority of European Jews embarking for the United States were “subnormal,” “twisted,” “deteriorated,” and full of “perverted ideas. . . . These are not those who hewed the forests, . . . conquered the wastes, and built America. These are beaten folk” who, “besides being as a class economic parasites, . . . are impregnated with Bolshevism.”

In short, according to the U.S. State Department, “this type of immigrant is not desirable from any point of view at this time.”

The 1924 Immigration quotas held even as Jews were being increasingly persecuted under Hitler. In 1939, even following Kristallnacht, only 8% of Americans polled said they wanted to accept more Jewish refugees. That same year, the final attempt to increase the quota – the Wagner-Rogers bill, which called for refuge for Jewish children specifically – was soundly defeated.

“One year later,” writes Spiro, “a similar bill to admit British children was introduced into the U.S. Congress. It was quickly approved.”

In fact, no Western nation would accept an increase in Jews. In 1938, representatives from 32 countries organized the Évian Conference to decide what to do about the ones then living under Nazi rule. The one Jewish representative who was invited to the conference, Golda Meir, wasn’t even allowed to speak. The only two countries in attendance that were willing to take in Jewish refugees were non-white – the Dominican Republic and Costa Rica.

Jews who were liberated from concentration camps following the war, far from being given refuge en masse, were instead put into displaced persons camps, where they had to stay for indefinite periods of time until they could be repatriated to their countries of origin. As many Jews feared persecution in those countries, they were forced to continue their underground network to Palestine (which was illegal at the time, as the British had barred their further immigration).

This shows us that, aside from a few treacherous elites such as FDR, Americans (and other Europeans) had no special love for the Jews. Most Americans, having little to no contact with Jews, were probably indifferent to them at best.

Blacks, who whites had much more experience with, were at the time of WWII still almost universally seen as inferior and as a mortal danger to whites.

There was no official legislation targeting the Jews by name in America, but they were effectively shut out of higher institutions by quotas and other regulations specifically designed to limit their numbers, just as the Immigration Act was.

For example, the dean of Harvard law school, Roscoe Pound (1916-1936), who is one of the most cited legal scholars in American history, was an open admirer of Hitler, saying he “was a man who can bring [Austria and Germany] freedom from agitating `movements.'”

Lawrence Lowell, who was president of Harvard until 1933, also admired the Nazis – sending representatives to Nazi Universities even as their ongoing persecution of the Jews was well-known – and worked feverishly to limit Jewish and black enrollment at Harvard. He also led the Secret Court of 1920, which purged the institution of homosexuals.

The most popular radio personality during the 30s was Father Charles Coughlin, whose broadcasts were openly anti-Semitic. At its peak his show had a listenership of up to 40 million (out of a population of roughly 120-130 million).

Father Charles Coughlin

Hitler’s private train, which took him to his “Eagle’s Nest” retreat, was code named Amerika, because he so much admired US industrial strength and transportation ability.

He especially admired the great American industrialist Henry Ford, who was also a highly vocal and influential anti-Semite. Hitler praised Ford by name in Mein Kampf, had a life sized portrait of him next to his desk, and modeled the Volkswagon on the Model T.

“You can tell Herr Ford that I am a great admirer of his,” Hitler told Prince Louis Ferdinand as he departed for the United States. “I shall do my best to put his theories into practice in Germany.”

In 1937, on Ford’s 75th birthday, Hitler awarded him the Grand Cross of the German Eagle – the highest honor that could be given to a foreigner.

Ford spent millions of his own money to wake the world to the Jewish menace, printing a total of 91 anti-Semitic articles in his Dearborn Independent, which he gave out free to every customer.

Henry Ford receiving the Grand Cross

Even Baldur Von Schirach, head of the Hitler Youth, was redpilled on the JQ by the Dearborn Independent articles when he was 17.

They influenced Hitler’s view on the Jews as well, and are quoted in Mein Kampf. Theodor Fritsch, Germany’s leading anti-Jewish publisher, translated and distributed them widely in Germany.

A core tenet of Hitler’s ideology was German expansionism: lebensraum. He was openly inspired in this endeavor by the conquest of America – “Manifest Destiny” –  and the British Empire. He considered Americans as well as the British as cousins to the Germans, as being cut from the same superior racial stock, and thus deserving of world mastery.

Germany, in his eyes, belonged at the apex alongside these two Nordic superpowers, as it was prior to WWI. He was playing catch up, not blazing any trails.

"In 1928, Hitler praised the Americans for having 'gunned down the millions of Redskins to a few hundred thousand'"

— Dr. Adrienne Keene (@NativeApprops) August 16, 2017

The infamous 1934 “Nuremberg Laws” were heavily influenced by – and wouldn’t have come into existence without – America’s “anti-miscegenation” laws, which banned marriage between a white and a non-white in 30 states.

Virginia – the land of Jefferson – was home to the infamous Racial Integrity Act of 1924. This Act designated people as non-white by the “one-drop rule,” This was significantly more hardcore than the Nuremberg Laws – “too racist” for the Nazis to copy.

These laws were lobbied for, and inspired by, the fiercely patriotic Madison Grant, whose lifetime achievements are absolutely breathtaking. He counted multiple U.S. Presidents as his friends including fellow white racialist Teddy Roosevelt (1901-1909) and Herbert Hoover (1929-1933).

Aside from popularizing race science and getting an impressive amount of pro-white legislation passed, Grant also led the way in creating the conservationist movement. The American bison, and dozens of other animals, would be extinct today if it weren’t for Grant.

In 1899, he founded the Bronx Zoo, which was four times larger than any other existing Zoo in the world and the first to attempt to recreate the animals’ natural habitats.

An African Pygmy, Ota Benga, was displayed in the Zoo as a semi-human evolutionary curiosity.

Ota Benga

Now I have to ask: How does using an African as a zoo exhibit jive with the assertion, made by many who are ostensibly on our side, that America was destined to be cucked or is the inevitable outcome of the phrase “all men are created equal”?

It doesn’t. Our biggest problem – our true fatal mistake – according to the bulk of the Alt-Right, has not been a handful of later-misinterpreted Enlightenment-inspired platitudes, but that we allowed Jews in our midst and then failed to deal with them properly.

After giving much thought as to why the above described period of our history is generally blacked out or glossed over, even while liberals love to beat us over the head with our “racist legacy,” I’ve concluded that it is because America has become such an engine of progressivism they prefer it to seem as though our history has been an uninterrupted, if slow-going, move toward egalitarianism, and these facts shatter that myth.

Therefore, those on the right who cherry pick quotes by the Founding Fathers to craft a narrative of American history being essentially a straight line to the left, from the signing of the Declaration of Independence to today, are in that regard undeniably marching in lockstep with the anti-American liberal left.

These points will be addressed further in the part 2 of this article.

I hate drama, but here is an ideological question.

Many voices are piping up complaining that nationalist men are too “misogynistic.” This comes from the “conservative” consultant urge inside many that actually believe we “need more women.”

Revolutions don’t have diversity quotas. Gavin McInnes types aggressively recruit “hot right-wing women” because like a strip club owner, he wants to part a fool from his money. What we are doing is very different.

As a heavily persecuted anti-establishment movement, we need more men. Especially men with nothing and nobody to lose. They’re out there in droves (especially under 30) and we need to reach them. In this time and for this action, only a culture of hyper-masculinity for its own sake can save the West.

You Want to be the J-Left?

The real reason the J-left finds itself dedicating resources to bullshit like “fat positivity” and feminism (in a time where women are making more money than men) is because it defers to women. This has a retarding effect, as childless women are selfish, conformist and infantile. The leftist worldview is articulated through Harry Potter and mocked by the world.

Most men under the rule of the J-left are bullied into becoming soyboys or fags because women in charge of grown-up world create suffocating, unforgiving and petty environments. Men who raise the red flags of Hot Topic Bolshevism – like Dick Sucking Assholes (DSA) – live lives of thankless misery. They attack Nazis with shields in the street and get smashed, and all their women do is call them cuckbois while secretly masturbating to the victorious Fascists. If they don’t opt for the tranny surgery, they are on the perpetual defensive simply for “toxic masculinity,” then under attack again for not being masculine enough.

Even men as high profile as Bernie Sanders, who was one of two men speaking at a women’s conference, was subjected to mass attack from hate-filled cat-ladies.

The second the state and money power stops protecting the J-left, they will be in for a world of hurt.

This is why the Judenpress is taking up the Trad Thot cause.

Let history’s soon-to-be-losers be led around by women. We conquer them, as their subconscious demands.

What Do Women Know?

Women don’t know much about the big world, i.e. politics. This is true even if they have a general understanding of what’s going on. What we are doing is war by another means.

Many of us have lost relationships, passed on job prospects, are constantly risking harm, death or imprisonment, and are forced by the oppressor to feel like we are alone against all. Emotionally and psychologically, this requires toughness a few stops away from sitting in a freezing trench with artillery blowing up around you.

Are women really willing to do that? Even most men aren’t.

Female advice on most things is either bad or naive. If you listen to women on how to get women, you’ll never get laid again.

Southern white knight culture is a big motivator in men who believe the Alt-Right is “misogynistic.” That is understandable, and I’m sure women are friendlier and more normal in the country than in the big cities where men live under the warm breath of cunt HR managers and play STD roulette with careerist whores.

But let’s not forget that it’s the Bible Belt that blows the rest of America away with its divorce rate. They’re clearly getting something wrong.

Keep Women in the Little World!

Most men get enough of women and the feminine pole in every aspect of their lives. At their jobs, at school, on TV, even on social media – women are the system’s middle managers and are in your face 24/7.

There are many groups and consumer trends fighting for the coveted “female demographic.” Creating a culture where male bonding is prioritized (even if it is offensive to women) would give us a monopoly. Whatever you think of Roosh, the reason he got so much shit from Jews a few years ago is because he tried to create such a culture using his meetup groups. This is how revolutions begin.

Andrew Anglin is the only alt right personality who is 100% red pilled on women. https://t.co/E1PkTky9B7

— Roosh (@rooshv) December 6, 2017

Once upon a time it was woman who was our escape. The warmth of the stove, the joy of laughing children, and the love of an adoring and loyal wife. The softness of a woman’s body is in and of itself a beautiful thing.

But the fact of the matter is that if you are a Millennial or Gen Z, there’s a good chance you will never have that no matter what you do. The overwhelming majority of women are broken and lost. They only love themselves, their money and their dog, and maybe if you hit on them the right way, you – for about 10 minutes. Probably 10 minutes after the last guy.

But don’t take the black pill and wait for sex robots. Instead, continue to court women (as sexual and romantic affection with women is key to a man’s psychological health) but always keep the futility of this in a society that incentivizes bad female behavior. Use it as fuel for the fight.

We have inherited a chaotic world. It’s up to our generation to restore everything (including women) back to order.

You can’t convince a kid not to eat ice cream for dinner or stay up late every night by letting him make the rules. Women that can’t handle the heavy-handed, vulgar, banter driven – yes, masculine – culture of the Alt-Right should be shown the door, not placated.

Not one person bought Matthew Prince’s claim that he helped destroy the principle of net neutrality forever simply because he was in a “bad mood.”

His various op-eds and interviews given after succumbing to demands by Israeli hackers to stop protecting The Daily Stormer’s legal speech from cyber terrorism revealed a conflicted man with a guilty conscience.

Now it seems he is finally opening about what really happened: he’s planning to get rich quick on (((Wall Street))) and is deathly afraid speculators will sink his future IPO.

His new internet philosophy? A bunch of armpit-stained Jewish stock brokers get the veto!

CNBC:

The CEO who pulled the final plug on the neo-Nazi web site Daily Stormer said he removed it from his company’s Internet service to protect his firm’s business in the run-up to a potential initial public offering (IPO).

“We were worried that people would say, ‘We won’t work with you anymore,'” Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince told CNBC.

“We had to have the conversation now because at some point we’ll be a public company. We had to prompt that discussion,” said Prince, who added “we want to be ready internally by July 2018,” for a possible stock offering.

Cloudflare now has more than 500 workers and plans to have at least 600 by the end of 2017, said Prince, who declined to share business details such as revenue or the company’s growth rate.

Cloudflare offers services that make companies’ web sites faster and more reliable. In the case of Daily Stormer, Cloudflare was providing a service that made it harder for attackers to take it offline with what’s known as a denial-of-service attack, where a web site is flooded with fake requests.

…

That’s because Cloudflare had a policy, stated on its own website, that it would not terminate a customer or take down content “due to political pressure.”

The stance in favor of free speech put the company in the crosshairs of those who said it was being sympathetic to violent, right-wing groups.

“We were stuck. We had this problem, [and] were very alone,” Prince told CNBC, as he sat on the rooftop of his company’s headquarters in San Francisco during the company’s annual Internet Summit in September.

But then comments from others forced the hand of Prince, who co-founded the company with COO Michelle Zatlyn in mid-2009.

First, another CEO “whom I admire,” Prince said, tweeted that Cloudlare should boot the Daily Stormer off its services, as its rivals had done.

Prince called up the fellow executive, whom he declined to name, and during the discussion, this person made a “thoughtful, rational argument.”

Who are these groups knocking on their door day and night demanding to know why they protect “ring-wing groups” from Israeli cyber terrorism?

Who is the CEO telling him to the pull the plug or risk attacks on his company’s stock?

Who? WHO?

All Prince has to do to save the First Amendment is publish the letters, give us the names, detail the corporate collusion. There is stuff going on behind the scenes in Silicon Valley that is probably illegal.

Instead he chooses to violate his company’s own policy in hopes of making lots of easy money.

These scumbags need to be exposed as the primary force behind the rapid erosion of free speech in America. If what is happening to Andrew Anglin was happening to an Iranian dissident, every “human rights” group on earth would be complaining loudly.

Jewish money and Gentile’s who prostitute themselves are the two greatest evils responsible for the collapse of Western civilization.

Protocol VII articulates it well:

“The intensification of armaments, the increase of police forces – are all essential for the completion of the aforementioned plans. What we have to get at is that there should be in all the States of the world, besides ourselves, only the masses of the proletariat, a few millionaires devoted to our interests, police and soldiers.”

Sound familiar? They want their borderless, raceless, genderless and cultureless slave state, and if they’re not stopped soon they will get it!

[Editor’s Note: How amazing is it that these money Jews only wanted one single site banned? Every other “racist anti-Semitic neo-Nazi White Supremacist hate site” is also protected by Cloudflare, and we’re the only ones that got kicked off. What does that tell you? Hopefully it tells you that we’re the ones you should be donating to and keeping online. We’ve now got a credit card option.]

On Tuesday, I published a satirical article mocking feminists who claim that National Socialism was feminist and that it was based off of pre-Christian Germanic paganism. Early Wednesday morning, someone claiming to be a TRUE NATIONAL SOCIALIST and going by the name of Wolfhelm Odinrider emailed me an article, telling me I had to publish it to “set the record straight.” I did that.

The first one had caused such emotional duress that I decided to go two for two. Not to reveal too much about he inner workings of my mind, but generally, when an article hits a nerve and causes drama, my instinct is to always push that point as hard as I can. Because my belief is that we need to be able to talk and joke about everything – that this is strength. So triggering people is like a physical therapy process.

“Nazi Feminists” male and female are still triggerable, but it turns out they are especially sensitive to having the foundations of their goofy ideology viciously mocked. Presumably, they know how dumb the whole thing is.

Beyond that, the articles also attacked more generally people who don’t view what we are engaged in as a political movement with real end goals. Instead they view it as fashion, or as a hobby, a game they are playing. It’s something that makes them feel special and important and different. It’s very similar to the way people, when I was in high school, dressed up in “gothic” clothing and listened to Marilyn Manson and acted like they were both different and superior to everyone else, when in actual fact they were just unattractive and/or socially awkward.

And hey, if it triggered people who didn’t understand all of that, then I don’t care and in fact think it is positive as well.

This whiny “how dare you??” stuff that goes on on the internet in right-wing circles has to end. It is too gay, and it represents a very serious type of personal weakness, which we need to be cleansed of. It needs to be made clear that it is not acceptable for people on the right to run around like sissies screaming about how someone hurt their feelings.

I do understand, however, that some of this is esoteric, which led to the confusion of innocent readers, which is why I’m explaining it here now.

This is all stuff we need to work through as a movement, because the people playing games are not helping the movement. In fact, if we continue to take them seriously, we risk allowing this whole thing to turn into a massive joke, as sadly happened to the old White Nationalist movement.

Why I Don’t Call Myself a “National Socialist”

As the satire was focused on edgy people who refer to themselves as “true National Socialists,” I think it would be worthwhile for me to explain why I don’t refer to myself that way.

Please note – and there is nuance here, so you’re going to have to work with me – that I am going to explain why I don’t refer to myself as NS in a political context. That is different than an ideological or philosophical context. In a philosophical context, I might consider myself as a National Socialist, but would probably be more likely to use the term “Esoteric Hitlerist.” But I would use that for myself as a person, which is only slightly relevant to the work I do on this site.

I have clearly defined goals, and everything that I do is to forward these goals. Some things work and some things do not, but I reevaluate and reflect constantly on what is working and what isn’t based on data.

On this site I would consider myself a troll, a political commentator and a journalist. I align politically with the Alt-Right movement, as it is a vehicle for me to accomplish my goals. My goals revolve around evangelizing for a certain way of thinking, which is pro-White, pro-patriarchy and pro-tradition. The most efficient way that I have found to promote these ideals is by attacking – often through mockery – everything that is in opposition to these ideals.

Note that the imagery of the NSDAP is something different than the political system, in that it is iconic and it seems to speak to a deep part of White Men’s souls. I believed that this imagery is both inspiring and triggering, and my testing data has backed up this belief, so I have continued to rely on it heavily.

I will just go ahead and list the basic reasons why I choose not to use the term “National Socialist” to define my political ideology, all of which relate to the terms lack of utility.

1.) Respect

National Socialism is an historical institution that was run by Adolf Hitler and which no longer exists.

I feel that appropriating that term to refer to myself or a movement that I am a member of would degrade the term and the history associated with it.

I think it is difficult for others to respect something which is clearly not in line with the historical nature of National Socialism – they were not meming frogs and mocking women and blacks in an absurd, comical fashion, and instead took a much more serious tone – and yet calls itself that. I do not think the culture that we live in is one where a movement which takes itself very serious can possibly thrive, so I shouldn’t take on a label of an historical movement that existed in a different time period, when that was an efficient way of marketing ideas.

2.) Historical Context

In a very practical sense, the term is not useful given the modern definition of the word “socialism.” That word is currently associated with a whole lot of baggage, almost all of it negative, and absolutely all of it leftist, and trying to work against modern language, rather than using modern language, is clearly a silly waste of time.

Hitler himself said that he chose the word “Socialism” because of how popular it was at the time. He then redefined the word to mean what he wanted it to mean.

The only reason I can think of to try and force meme “socialism” as a term that means what it meant during the Third Reich would be pure edginess. Or perhaps non-utilitarian devotion to an ideal, for which you are willing to sacrifice efficiency.

I am entirely opposed to edginess for the sake of edginess, and instead embrace utilitarian solutions to real problems. By trying to redefine a word, you are creating for yourself yet another challenge. We have enough challenges already.

3.) Freshness

Publicly aligning ourselves to an old and extinct political movement is not forward thinking, and it isn’t fresh. If we had a Hitler clone, he would be against the idea of trying to reboot a dead political movement.

Obviously, most or all of what Hitler and his companions said I agree with, and I believe that any new political system should draw from the knowledge and experience of that era. However, that in no way implies a need to use the name.

Hitler drew on historical influences in forming his own system, and we need to approach our own struggle in the same way.

4.) Hitler is Dead

National Socialism was Hitler’s personal project. He died before it was completed. There was never a fully coherent political doctrine which can just be implemented.

People seem to have an idea this was all a lot smoother than it actually was. Hitler only ruled for 6 years before the war started, and there was never a stable political structure.

For instance, the Reichstag – the German parliament – existed throughout his 12 year reign. He simply acted with executive authority given a state of emergency, after the Reichstag building was burned down by a communist and he passed the Enabling Act, in march of 1933 – two months after he was installed as Chancellor.

Mein Kampf is not a political doctrine so much as a book of philosophy. And National Socialism was also much more of a philosophy than a political doctrine. Hitler’s power grab was through divine providence, but in real terms it was through the man exploiting opportunities in a very practical manner.

I think he would have worked NS into a system that could have been repeated and implemented as a political system, if he’d been given the time, but that just didn’t ever happen. Instead, it functioned as a security state military dictatorship ruling over a rejected “socialist republic,” through the force of Hitler’s charisma, will and vision.

This isn’t something that you can just set up as a governmental system, in the way that the US unpacks “democracy” across the planet, or the way Spain set up colonial governments, or the way Europeans set up monarchies, or the way Moslems set up a caliphate.

“National Socialism” as a political system included a lot of duct tape.

5.) Succession

The most glaring problem that was not solved under Hitler was the problem of succession. And that is very, very important for any authoritarian political system.

NS was a Hitler personality cult, when it comes right down to it, and if we imagine a universe where the war never happened, he still had serious health problems and would not have made it to 65.

I have no idea what would have happened in that situation. I assume he would have worked it out where power was transferred to more than one person. Having the kind of power that Hitler had in the hands of one person who was not Hitler would not have been something that Hitler would have felt comfortable with. Maybe he could have handpicked a successor (he sort of did with Rudolph Hess), but then to allow Hess to pick a successor, for his successor to pick a successor, and so on and so forth through generations would be seen as nonviable. It takes a very special type of man to efficiently wield that kind of power. Not even kings had that level of power during the feudal age; there were checks and balances.

This is All Known

Anyone who understands the way politics work and knows the history of the Third Reich at all knows what I have just said is true.

Again – this does bear repeating – there is a philosophy about what a state should be in a moral, social and ideological sense that is called “National Socialism” which exists and which I believe should be consulted. If people want to label themselves National Socialists in the philosophical sense, then I see no problem with that.

What I have a problem with is talking about how we “need a National Socialist country” – because I don’t know what that means and I don’t think anyone saying it does either, unless they’re talking about cloning Hitler and putting him in charge of America (which I would support, for the record).

All of this leads me to my point: these people claiming we “need a National Socialist state” are either severely uninformed and confused or are purposefully trying to create confusion.

LARPer Among Us

I actually want a revolution. That is my goal. I don’t have any other goals.

It should be understood, however, that there are people who are attaching themselves onto our political movement – either directly or in the periphery – who do not have the goal of revolution. They have goals which are entirely personal, mainly revolving around making themselves feel important and snowflake special.

“LARP” stands for “Live Action Role Playing.” It is a reference to people who played Dungeons and Dragons in real life. They would dress up like fantasy characters and walk around. It was a big thing in the 70s, and people still engage in it now. Or so I’ve been told.

This metaphor applies to those who want to use this movement for personal reasons, rather than the goal of actual political and social revolution.

That is the kind of people I see running around talking about “True National Socialism.”

These people will disingenuously claim that the Alt-Right is not hardcore enough for them, that they are the most hardcore in the world and they would never lower themselves to being a part of a popular movement.

Instead, they want to spend their time attacking people who are having real success at changing the narrative by claiming that those people are not hardcore enough.

And it is all completely disingenuous. They will continually make claims like “the Alt-Right accepts homosexuals.” If pressed to give examples, they will say MILO, who was the opposite of the Alt-Right – he was an enemy of the movement who came in and tried to destroy it by stealing our brand and making it a vehicle for his own edgy fame-mongering.

Most of these people are also feminists, male or female. This is to be expected, as using the space of men who are trying to throw a revolution to do a role-playing game and try to leech off of our energy in order to propel their own self image is a very feminine activity.

That is where the whole “pagan” thing intersects with all of this. There is a 1500 year history of Christian civilization, and that ties back to Ancient Rome and Greece before that, and none of them had feminism.

However, modern new age writers and the TV show “Vikings” have created a fantasy surrounding Germanic paganism: that somehow these were cultures where women were equal to men.

This obviously isn’t true, but new age writers have engaged in a complex manipulation of history in order to create things like “shield maidens” and the idea that men consulted women on political matters and even war.

They then tie that back to National Socialism, claiming that this was a pagan system, even while Hitler was a practicing catholic and the majority of party members were Christians.

It is fair enough to say that many in he Party were non-Christian, but I don’t think a single one was anything close to the neo-pagan ideas which are now being spread on the internet, which is some kind of literal resurrection of pre-civilized ancestor worship.

Alfred Rosenberg, by far the most vocal non-Christian in the party, was not a “pagan” but instead wanted to create an entirely new religion, which he described as “A religion of blood.” You can read about this in his book “The Myth of the 20th Century.”

This is very interesting, but I do not feel that it is at this time useful politically.

The other prominent non-Christian, Heinrich Himmler, created a doctrine that did indeed rely on elements of Germanic paganism, but his goal was to create a special occult doctrine for the SS, modeled after the Society of Jesus. It didn’t ever actually happen. This, also, has no utility right now for us where we are.

The more general party link was the Thule society, which like Himmler’s cult was an occult doctrine, rather than an actual attempt at neo-paganism, which used Germanic paganism as a template for the esoteric theology.

Hitler himself rejected the Thule society, viewing the pagan aspects as politically useless in Christian Germany and also was uninterested for equally practical reasons in the exultation of the individual that they and all other occult systems tend to obsess over.

All of this is to say that the “paganism” of the Third Reich is exaggerated and perhaps virtually non-existent (the real non-Christian doctrines being those of Rosenberg), and is simply being used by the LARPers as a way to attach feminism to National Socialism.

So as not to trigger anyone unnecessarily in an essay where my goal is to try and speak clearly rather than to prod, I personally do not have any use for trying to resurrect a dead religion, but I’m not especially bothered if someone feels compelled to do that. My view currently is that politics need to remain totally separate from religion, and that this should be strictly enforced.

I should give the same caveat for people who do choose to identify as National Socialist in a political sense, but do not fit the definitions I’ve laid out here. In particular, European political parties in countries that have an actual history attached to the movement may think it makes sense to use this term. These countries also have a different relationship with the term “socialism” than we do in America. So I am fine with that, and don’t want them to feel like I’ve targeted them with this biting satire.

The Future

We will be making political parties. Or perhaps we will be taking over existing ones.

The future that we want is one which looks very much like the future that was envisioned by Adolf Hitler. However, we need to come at this from a practical angle. That is to say, we need to figure out what the most efficient way to accomplish our goals is, and do that, rather than do some kind of weird thing where we try to signal how hardcore we are to others on the internet. The latter is baby nonsense, which has no place in a serious political movement.

I care about results, period. I don’t care about being edgy for the sake of edginess and I don’t care about signaling how hardcore I am.

Hitler himself wrote this in Mein Kampf:

What we must fight for is to safeguard the existence and reproduction of our race and our people, the sustenance of our children and the purity of our blood, the freedom and independence of the fatherland, so that our people may mature for the fulfillment of the mission allotted it by the creator of the universe. Every thought and every idea, every doctrine and all knowledge, must serve this purpose. And everything must be examined from this point of view and used or rejected according to its utility.

There are people who do not want to reject things based on their lack of utility, for whatever reason. They may be because they are playing a game, or they may simply genuinely believe that “principles” are more important than getting things done. I don’t know, or care, and it is really none of my business. I simply want nothing to do with that type of thinking.

There are many things which have no utility.

Some examples:

1. Trying to force meme various religious ideologies. This has been a disaster, from the start. Whether it is some version of Christianity, neo-paganism or some other doctrine, it is now clear that none of these things have been productive or useful to the cause. People should be allowed to hold whatever religious views they wish, but this political movement is not the place to promote them, or to try and force them on others.
2. Talking about how hardcore you are, trying to prove how hardcore you are, making being hardcore (rhetorically) a virtue. This turns off normal people and even turns me off. It is try-hardy and uncool. Talking constantly about “degeneracy” and “race-mixers” and engaging in bridge club type old lady gossip creates a climate of bitterness and obsession, and this projects not only a lack of a fun atmosphere that people want to be a part of, but also unseriousness. We know what we believe as far as what the world should look like, I think we all agree on it, and we advocate for that. We should not be caught up in virtue signaling.
3. Attempting to force-meme elements of 1920s revolutionary groups in a modern setting. In particular, I see no reason whatsoever to talk about “workers” or “capitalism” or “socialism” or economics at all for that matter, as these are not issues that our target audience presently feels any connection to. The economic issues of the modern era are in fact social issues, given the developments which have been made in the last decades with regards to mechanisms of production. The issues that our target audience deals with now are under-employment and unemployment, while living on state handouts, which leads to a lack of meaning in men’s lives. More than that, perhaps, men struggle with women. They want to have families, and that is being denied them. Moreover, men have a need to possess power or be in its proximity by being a part of a system that is powerful. These are real issues that our target audience deals with in their everyday lives, and these are the issues we should be focusing on.
4. Attacking our own people. This is, to me, completely insane, and it is something that should be straightforward for everyone. We have an open market here on the internet, where people can produce as much as they are able to produce, at as high of a quality as they are able to manage. If someone does not like what someone else is doing, they can state their reasons for that in a polite fashion, if they believe it is necessary, or they can simply work on their own projects. What I see is a lot of people who are incapable of producing anything of value, who instead attack others in order to bring attention to themselves. This is horrible. Because these people will always exist – I have a feeling that most of them are being (((managed))) – we should be able to establish a rule that they should be ignored, rather than engaged.
5. Involving women on any level, at all, on the political side of the movement. We have had zero success with this. It has been tried. All women have done has cause problems. And no, it doesn’t “bring people into the movement.” No matter how hot a girl is, no man with even a little bit of masculinity or self-respect is going to be swayed in his political or ideological convictions by a woman. What does work is being sexy, and attracting women. Creating a movement that women are attracted to, so you have groupies. That is good. Bringing women in as speakers, writers, podcasters, whatever, simply makes us look like a joke and causes endless drama.

There are many other examples of things that have been tried which have been proven to have no utility but which people continue to try and push anyway. I think this needs to stop. Soon, I am going to write up a history of previous White Nationalist movements, where many different things were tried, and most of them did not work. I think we need to look hard at that, and learn from it.

Overall, the way forward is simply to do what works and to not do what doesn’t work.

The satirical pieces I published were intended to highlight the absurdity of some of those people who insist on pushing things that we know do not work.

It is time that we stopped taking these people seriously, and stopped trying to engage them at all. It isn’t helping, and it won’t help. With the internet, people are able to demonstrate their utility. We need to work with people who have demonstrated their utility and who are bringing something to the table. If they are not bringing anything to the table, even if they are nice people, we need to let them go and do their own thing.

We do not have time to play games.

We are in a war.

And it is a war that I intend to win.

Hail Victory.

On Saturday 29th, NRM held a street march in the Norwegian city of Kristiansand, provoking a nationwide conversation on free speech as well as the right to assembly.

When some 70 men showed up in the sleepy south-coast city to protest the gay lobby, national publicity was sure to follow. After tons of coverage, it is becoming increasingly clear that the Nordic Resistance Movement’s mission was a staggering success, as they hijacked the news-cycle for several days and managed to force a national conversation on the right to protest.

Though initially intended to be a march through the city of Fredrikstad, plans were changed after their permit was revoked due to threats of left-wing violence.

While cucks like the mayor and certain left-leaning political parties reacted in outrage, many have voiced support for the movement in their ongoing struggle against the gay lobby, who are actively pushing pride parades, pedophilia, bestiality and other forms of degeneracy on the Norwegian people.

Dum Phuk (Boardmember of Youth Right and honorary Viet Cong), had a problem with Nords marching proudly through their own streets.

Some have tried to claim the protest was illegal, and heavy criticisms has rained over local police for not violently shutting it down, however this is patently false, as argued by professor of Law, Hans Fredrik Marthinussen.

Dagbladet:

There are many who believe the police should have interevened because the demonstration was not reported in accordance with the requirement of the Police Act section 11 which says that all demonstration should be reported to the Police a good while in advance. However, the short notice given in this instance has to be seen in light of the highly dubious permit denial in Fredrikstad which happened recently.

In that instance, the police put a ban on the demonstration due to fears of violent counter-demonstrations by the left. I find it hard to understand that the danger of counter demonstrations is sufficient ground to deny a permit, as this would effectively ban all unpopular opinions. It is the Police’s duty to ensure that everyone has a right to say what they want in public.

Another point worth mentioning is that although the police did detain several marchers on the Swedish border, as well as several other unnecessary acts of harassment, they also let NRM march without much incident.

At times, the police even removed a few would-be communists showboaters from their path, including one local C-list celebrity who was dragged away in cuffs, presumably for his own safety (He later claimed to have broken a rib, oy vey).

Eventually, the march wound down peacefully and NRM departed the city, leaving untold amounts of leftist butthurt in their wake.

Norwegian leader Haakon Forwald schooling the lügenpresse.

This is what peak aesthetic looks like, non-whites might not like it, but it’s true.

For more information about the event, make sure to listen in to their podcast (it’s in English!)

Also, follow Nordfront on twitter if you’re not already.

Brave activists use cover of darkness to cut down symbols of sodomy, leaving behind a message of hope.

Thursday night, some unknown heroes dismantled the oppressive rainbows of the gay lobby in Fredrikstad. The banners of buggery had been placed there by the city council to remind the locals who rules over them. However, with the help of cutting implements, the flagpoles were liberated of their ability to display the degenerate drapery and instead furnished with glorious stickers of solidarity.

“Smash the gay lobby, frihetskamp.net ” – Much better.

This symbolic act of liberation comes after the Nordic Resistance Movement was denied their right to protest by Fredrikstad police, after the left threatened to commit violence upon the residents of the city, thereby jeopardizing their planned July 29^th march in the area.

Of course, media reaction was as instantaneous as it was hysterical.

Vg.no:

Fredrikstad municipality [flies] flags for tolerance, diversity and inclusion. Thursday night, someone cut the lines and hung up Nazi posters.

“What does one say about something like this? I think it’s sad that we have to raise flags for this in the first place, and even sadder that these people chose to respond in this manner. It’s cowardly, though not unexpected. However, that doesn’t make it any less frustrating” says mayor Kari Agerup (Labor) to VG.

The flags were erected as a reaction to the national socialist group the Nordic Resistance Movement and its intent to demonstrate in Fredrikstad earlier this summer, under the slogan “smash the gay lobby.”

This caused quite a stir, and a unanimous council voted to put down a committee to find ways to show the city’s commitment to tolerance, diversity and inclusion. Putting up flags in July was one of the measures they settled on.

The pride flags had been lowered for the night because the council feared a retaliation of this kind, and so the activists could only cut the lines to the flagpole and add the stickers. The next morning, the fire department raised the flags again.

The act of “vandalism” has been reported to the police.

How many government employees does it take to enforce faggotry? An entire fire department it would seem.

When will the elites learn that the populace will not stand for such a blatant display of disrespect towards the people? If the flags flown in the city are pride flags then it is of course natural to assume the people are ruled by faggots and not by the lawful authority of the state. As such, the Nordic Resistance Movement is one hundred percent correct in pointing out that society is controlled by a gay lobby, and it is the duty of every able-bodied man to smash it.

Suppose you were a stranger and saw a city flying a Norwegian flag, a county flag, and three LGBT flags, who would you assume ran things?

Keep up the good work whoever you are!

UPDATE: Some of these Hitler quotes are fake Hitler quotes. Point still stands though.

As it turns out, antifa in fact very much love Hitler.

This speaks to the old adage: “everyone loves Hitler – even if they don’t know it yet.”

A very good troll at a Chicago “Impeach Trump March” this week was able to read an entire speech worth of Hitler quotes, and get the crowd to cheer for it.

Here’s the transcript (minus the first line):

Ladies, Gentleman, and non-binary members of this congregation:

I would like to thank everyone for coming out today to support the constitutional rule of law, I stand here today, a veteran of these United States armed forces, and a proud 21st century patriot. I would like to take this opportunity to talk about this oppressive regime, and the repressive regime that constitutes capitalism as a whole.

We are Socialists, we are enemies of the capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with it’s unfair salaries, rights it’s unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions.

Benefit to the community precedes benefit to the individual… The state should retain supervision and each property owner should consider himself appointed by the state. It is his duty not to use his property against the interests of others among his own people. This is the crucial matter. This American Nation will always retain its right to control the owners of property… A policy of laissez faire in this sphere is not only cruelty to the individual guiltless victims but also to the nation as a whole.

For there is one thing we must never forget… the majority can never replace the man.

Life is like a mirror, if you frown at it, it frowns back, if you smile it returns the greeting.

Donald Trump seems to think that if you tell a big enough lie, and tell it frequently enough, that it will be believed. It’s not the truth that matters, but victory.

The doom of a nation can be averted only by a storm of flowing passion, but only those who are passionate themselves can arouse passion in others.

Of course, I don’t know (and don’t really care to find out) if this was some Alt-Lite anti-Hitler figure who wants to prove the point that these antifa are all gerbils.

It does not matter if that is the case.

What matters is this: everyone loves Hitler.

You could give a similar speech as this to a group of cuckservatives, and they would similarly cheer.

Hitler is the man of all men: the great uniter.

Left wing, right wing – it does not matter.

We all love Hitler.

Finally, Murdoch Murdoch give Andrew Anglin a named cameo.

The balance of the universe is restored.

Years of Lead is a new weekly podcast featuring Eric Striker, George and Frank. Future episodes will have special guests with a number of interesting perspectives from around the world.

Topics covered:

• Immigration theory: Clash of Civilizations vs Jewish problem.
• Pathological Altruism?: Contrasts between Latin Corruption vs Germanic Corruption, and why there’s nothing altruistic about the German or Swedish governments.
• Government By Childless Women and the Iron Croc Shoe.
• Strong families as antidote to New World order, and why nations with weak family structures are struggling to fight back.
• Anthropology of the Classical world and Feudalism.
• Croats and Serbs and the downside of family (and grudge) centered societies.
• The problem of contemporary national chauvinism.
• Red Pilling America on Gypsy scum aka “Roma People” 39:00.
• Changing articles in response to the noun in Western racial discussion.
• Transsexuals, and the real reason they commit suicide.
• Making a Stand: Sacramento Spartans, Based Stickman and the Radicalization of the impotent Right.
• Self-defense and Taking back our streets. Know the law. FILM EVERYTHING!
• (((Conservatives))) and their Mental Gymnastics as the #1 Barrier To Nationalism.
• Why Jews/Leftists are forced to try and silence us with force.
• (((Michael Savage))) and the seductive obfuscators.
• Liberals as malicious enemies rather than naive care bears.
• Why the Left is right about most things for all the wrong reasons.
• NS critique of free market ideology.
• Libertarianism, multiculturalism , and civic disengagement.
• Ayn Rand, and how Jews perceive our countries like they’re visiting Las Vegas.
• Geert Wilders and Holland: Can he Win? Probably not. (this was recorded the day before the Dutch election).
• Calvinism and Judaization.

Download

Note: last 5 minutes did not record so expect an abrupt finish.