A documentary about the life of Dr. Anthony Fauci, simply called “Fauci,” started streaming on Disney+ last week.

Unlike the professional critics, who loved this sensitive and soulful portrait of one of Science’s most devout servants, the general public don’t seem too impressed by it.

Fox News:

National Geographic’s new documentary about Dr. Anthony Fauci has been ignored by audiences on Rotten Tomatoes, despite overwhelmingly positive reviews from professional critics.

Directed by John Hoffman and Janet Tobias, “Fauci” has been in select theaters since Sept. 10 and started streaming Oct. 6 on Disney+. The film features interviews with Fauci as well as his wife Christine and daughter Jenny. Figures ranging from former President George W. Bush and Susan Rice to Bill Gates and Bono also weigh in.

Rotten Tomatoes, which aggregates reviews from both professional critics and online users, was conspicuously lacking in audience reviews for “Fauci.” As of Sunday, the only audience review was from “Justin B.,” who gave the movie two and half stars out of five.

“While the film had some interesting back story regarding Fauci’s career and family history, as a documentary it is severely lacking. While it is a challenge to give a truly analytical and unbiased assessment, the producers here don’t even try,” the user wrote.

“They have some background noise of people saying mean things about Fauci and then make clear those are unfair and go about interviewing only people who fawn all over him. There are no interviews of anyone who question the quality of the job he has done. There is no real assessment of the quality his tenure during the pandemic,” the review continued.

Due to a constant influx of negative ratings, Rotten Tomatoes ended up disabling user reviews entirely.

Rotten Tomatoes us trying to hide the audience score for the biggest Clown in America Anthony Fauci
Gee I wonder why? 🤣🤣🤣👇 pic.twitter.com/1GvR3verKf

— Vince Langman (@LangmanVince) October 11, 2021

Rotten Tomatoes had to disable the “audience score” for Disney’s Fauci documentary. https://t.co/oFc1akU1xu

— Michael P Senger (@MichaelPSenger) October 11, 2021

For some reason, people just seem to really hate this man.

Meet Susan Goldberg the strong and empowered Jewish woman who is currently in the process of destroying National Geographic with all types of kikery.

National Geographic is one of the most beloved publications in modern history. It rose to cultural prominence in the 20th century providing readers with all sorts of stories and pictures from far away places. My late grandmother used to have huge stacks of these magazines in her house.

As culturally significant as this publication has been, the current Jewish Editor-in-Chief Susan Goldberg has made numerous criticisms about the magazine’s so-called “racist” past.

AP:

National Geographic acknowledged on Monday that it covered the world through a racist lens for generations, with its magazine portrayals of bare-breasted women and naive brown-skinned tribesmen as savage, unsophisticated and unintelligent.

“We had to own our story to move beyond it,” editor-in-chief Susan Goldberg told The Associated Press in an interview about the yellow-bordered magazine’s April issue, which is devoted to race.

National Geographic first published its magazine in 1888. An investigation conducted last fall by University of Virginia photography historian John Edwin Mason showed that until the 1970s, it virtually ignored people of color in the United States who were not domestics or laborers, and it reinforced repeatedly the idea that people of color from foreign lands were “exotics, famously and frequently unclothed, happy hunters, noble savages_every type of cliché.”

For example, in a 1916 article about Australia, the caption on a photo of two Aboriginal people read: “South Australian Blackfellows: These savages rank lowest in intelligence of all human beings.”

You can call that statement about aboriginals all sorts of things, but you can’t say that it is wrong. Aboriginals on average have some of the lowest IQs on the planet. Before all of journalism was kiked, publications like National Geographic actually took pride in reporting factual information.

National Geographic’s reporting on the intelligence of Aboriginals in 1916 is as accurate then as it is today. Just look at these savage creatures and try to find fault with their logic.

Goldberg goes on to talk about how the magazine promoted racist stereotypes of Pacific island women while bashing colonialism as a very bad thing.

In addition, National Geographic perpetuated the cliche of native people fascinated by technology and overloaded the magazine with pictures of beautiful Pacific island women.

“I think National Geographic was a product of its time,” Goldberg said. “It started at the height of colonialism and that is the lens through which it covered the world.”

Obviously the insinuation she is making is that colonialism was the most evil thing to ever happen and the product of White racists. But if colonialism as a concept was so bad, perhaps she’d like to lecture her fellow Jews about the Jewish colony of Israel in Palestine. She does not do this because criticism of colonialism is only meant to bash White people.

This examination comes as other media organizations are also casting a critical eye on their past. The New York Times recently admitted that most of its obituaries chronicled the lives of white men, and began publishing obituaries of famous women in its “Overlooked” section.

In National Geographic’s April issue, Goldberg, who identified herself as National Geographic’s first woman and first Jewish editor, wrote a letter titled “For Decades, Our Coverage Was Racist. To Rise Above Our Past, We Must Acknowledge It.”

“I knew when we looked back there would be some storytelling that we obviously would never do today, that we don’t do and we’re not proud of,” she told AP. “But it seemed to me if we want to credibly talk about race, we better look and see how we talked about race.”

The fact that you have a Jewish woman in charge of this magazine means that the publication will never talk honestly about race in any capacity. The magazine has lost all credibility with this awful Jew in charge of it. It’s laughable for her to say otherwise and claim that bashing the magazine’s entire history as a racist mistake is somehow elevating their credibility on the subject.

But hell, with this kike running things, National Geographic has abandoned its original purpose and is even going so far as to push tranny propaganda. Just look at these recent magazine covers.

Jews have destroyed pretty much everything so it is not a surprise to see a Jew destroying one of the most iconic magazines of all time. The only solution to this problem is to ban Jews from our societies entirely.

Avery Jackson was five-years-olds when he started living as a transgendered freak.

According to Mirror, he started questioning his gender when he was four, and even tried to cut his own penis off because it was, ‘in the way.’

Avery started wearing dresses when he was around 4-years-old, and then wanted to start wearing them full time.

There’s no logic behind thinking that he knew he wasn’t supposed to be a boy simply because of his actions as a toddler. Kids do really weird/strange things. It doesn’t shock me in the slightest that a little kid would attempt to cut off it’s own penis. The child is curious and testing the boundaries, this is nothing new.

If a parent catches their son trying to dismantle their genitals, that is when the parent is supposed to do their job and educate the child that it’s an important part of their body, and that it’s an important part of making them who they are – a boy.

Avery pretending to know what it’s talking about

The parents make it sounds so dramatic by saying they ‘hid all the sharp objects’ but who lets a young kid near sharp objects? This is standard procedure. Why? Because they can’t think about outcomes and will probably cut a finger off.

We shouldn’t let children change their genders for the same reason they aren’t allowed to get a tattoo. A child is not old enough to establish and know who they are. They chop and change, go through fads and stages, and then grow out of them.

One more transgendered little girl is one less future white male 

Little girls now become boys because of what was once known as the tomboy stage. Instead of waiting for the girl to get over the tomboy stage, it is now taken as a serious life decision and apparently confirms that they should’ve been a boy.

Little boys go through stages of exploring girly things, but it’s nothing more than that- a stage. Boys are especially drawn to nail polish and playing dress ups if they have older sisters.

National Geographic is promoting child abuse by putting a victim of child abuse on it’s cover and making it out to be some amazing thing.

Excuse me for not seeing this as ‘progressive’

Avery’s parents can pretend they’ve done right by their child, but they’ve doing nothing more than sign him up for a long life full of psych visits.

NBC:

In an effort to shed more light on a topic that has been at the center of social and political debates all year, National Geographic will be debuting a new magazine and accompanying documentary dedicated to examining gender around the world.

Avery Jackson, a nine-year-old girl from Missouri, graces the cover of the magazine, making her the first transgender person to be on the cover of National Geographic.

“We wanted to look at how traditional gender roles play out all over the world, but also look into gender as a spectrum. There’s lots of coverage on celebrities, but there wasn’t an understanding on real people and the issues we face every day in classrooms or workplaces in regards to gender.”

The magazine issue, titled “Gender Revolution,” covers a wide range of topics, from examinations of traditional gender roles and rituals of manhood or womanhood, to conversations with people who do not identify with these traditional roles. While putting together this January issue, National Geographic spoke with more than 100 children and teens around the world.

Being transgender is not something to be celebrated, it’s a mental illness and the suicide rates are through the roof. Those who get surgery usually end up killing themselves or otherwise live a life full of depression and regret.

Is nobody concerned with the mental state of a child who is brainwashed from a young age that they should behave like the opposite gender?

Avery appears to have only ever experienced life as a girl, what clue does he have about being a boy?

There’s no such thing as ‘genders’ but being a girl automatically means dresses and wearing pink when it concerns transgender victims.

And if a child wants to dress up as a dinosaur, what do we do with that? Are they not a human but an animal? Were they born in the wrong body? From the video of Avery speaking, he seems to really love dressing up as animals. Maybe he’s not really a girl but an animal? Why is nobody exploring this?

The Jewish owned media should halt their gay agenda for five seconds to show support for those that are supposed to be animals.

Yes Goy, express yourself.

It was good to see that the reaction to National Geographic normalizing child abuse was far from accepting. People took to Twitter and Facebook to show their disgust and even called for others to boycott the magazine, which I also heavily recommend doing.

#NationalGeographic – What #GenderRevolution there never was one. Only a bunch of crafted & confused people that developed a mental disorder pic.twitter.com/9oM2UFKpxh

— Patriot By God ?? (@PatriotByGod) December 17, 2016

#Boycott @NatGeo guys.

They promote child abuse in the form of promoting confusing children about their gender.#NationalGeographic

— ? Reality Calls ? (@RealityCallsV) December 17, 2016

#NationalGeographic Promotes Mental Disorders For Children https://t.co/Gba87l3LIk via @YouTube #Transgender #LGBT #Trans #Psychology

— ForYahweh (@ForYahweh) December 17, 2016

PATHETIC!!!#NationalGeographic Magazine Now Promoting Transgender Lifestyle To Very Young #Children https://t.co/LewVNn7fbA t #news

— Grace ? (@theLocketChick) December 19, 2016

@yashar WHY ARE WE GLORIFYING THIS?! SHE/HE IS 8 YEARS OLD! 8! #NationalGeographic #Trans

— Politics&Stuff (@Brain_Power123) December 19, 2016

OMG #Nationalgeographic is pushing "trans-children" bullshit??? https://t.co/Evm5vmObJB

— N.R. (@DragonNanoha) December 17, 2016

Child abuse. #NationalGeographic #GenderRevolutionhttps://t.co/3iGe9gSLV5

— Patrick Watts (@chatswithpat92) December 19, 2016

So when Avery is a grown ‘woman’ and commits suicide (or at least attempts it) because nobody genuinely helped him with his gender identity disorder, National Geographic can pat themselves on the back for encouraging his downfall.

In the bombastic, absolutist fashion typical of modern liberal propaganda, the National Geographic back in 2013 declared that in a short time the entirety of America will be mixed-race.

They first declared that this will be great, because of a reduction of genetic diseases and blah blah blah.  They should have stopped there, but they didn’t.  Instead they decided to show photographs of real mixed-race people to let us know what this will look like.

What we see is a bunch of monstrous creatures, like something out of a the Hellraiser films.

Like all living things, all races evolved naturally, to exist as natural beings in their own environment.  They all have an equilibrium of genes which arranged themselves – or were arranged by God, if you prefer – to be an ideal thing.

For me personally, there is little offensive about the appearance of any pure race.  Even African Negroes just look like a type of upright monkey.  I do not feel disgusted when I see photographs of them, necessarily.  However, both Jews and Arabs, being entire ethnicities of mixed-race people, have a disgusting and vulgar look to them, an offensive and unnatural misshapenness.

And that feeling of disgust, which I very much associate with the feeling I would get when seeing the Cenobites as a young boy, is what I get when I look at this series of photographs of mixed-race monstrosities.

If this is the future that awaits us, I would rather take my chances with Lemarchand’s box.