I guess these cowardly Moslem homos can stay home and fight for their people now.

As you are all by now aware, President Trump signed an executive order banning refugees from certain areas he deemed hotbeds of radical Islam, in order to avoid a situation arising here like they have in so much of Europe, with all the terror attacks and ficki ficki rampages on our women and children,

Today, that order began taking effect, and lead to many developments, some hilarious, some infuriating but entirely expected, but most very encouraging, to say the least.

Keep deporting, Glorious Leader!

Reuters:

President Donald Trump’s order to restrict people from seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the United States sparked confusion and anger on Saturday after immigrants and refugees were kept off flights and left stranded in airports.

In his most sweeping decision since taking office a week ago, Trump, a Republican, put a four-month hold on allowing refugees into the United States and temporarily barred travelers from Syria and six other countries.

This is what we call “a good start.”

Of course we need to ban these camel jockeys and all other adherents of this heathen, goat loving, child-raping desert cult, so the list needs to be longer, but I’m certainly not gonna complain. I’m sure once they’ve worked the bugs out of these executive orders and have a little case law to back them up, more countries will be added to the list, so just think of this as a trial balloon.

Trump, a businessman who successfully tapped into American fears about terror attacks during his campaign, had promised what he called “extreme vetting” of immigrants and refugees from areas the White House said the U.S. Congress deemed to be high risk.

He told reporters in the White House’s Oval Office on Saturday that his order was “not a Muslim ban” and said the measures were long overdue.

“It’s working out very nicely. You see it at the airports, you see it all over,” Trump said.

Of course, it is a Muslim ban. We just can’t call it that…yet. But it’s definitely subhuman raghead heathens at the shit end of Glorious Leader’s big stick, and they are taking a walloping, bigly.

Of course, their fellow sand turds and a coterie of racially challenged minorities and White anti-Whites began doing what they always do now – they protested!

“Let them in, let them in!” they cried. Well, nobody is gonna let them in and our Commander-in-Chief doesn’t care about your anti-American tears, nor is he swayed by your ideological flatulence. He has a pen and a phone, and he’s using them. I remember someone else doing that, but none of these progs seemed to mind then.

So next, some subhuman taxi drivers decided to go on strike, likely to an elated driving public. These human compost heaps don’t even belong in America, so who cares if they strike? Not me.

USA Today:

New York taxi drivers have their own response to President Donald Trump’s immigration ban: A strike.

As protests continue to break out across major U.S. airports Saturday night following President Trump’s immigration ban, taxi drivers at New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport have gone on strike.

In postings to social networks Saturday the New York Taxi Workers Alliance announced that from 6 p.m. to 7 p.m. ET there would be no pickups at JFK as a protest to the immigration ban that some are taking as a ban on Muslims.

BREAKING: NYTWA drivers call for one hour work stoppage @ JFK airport today 6 PM to 7 PM to protest #muslimban! #nobannowall

— NY Taxi Workers (@NYTWA) January 28, 2017

Besides, there’s Uber anyway, so let these idiots do without a paycheck for a while. It’s a win-win situation.

Surge pricing has been turned off at #JFK Airport. This may result in longer wait times. Please be patient.

— Uber NYC (@Uber_NYC) January 29, 2017

Then, of course, the lawyers rolled in…

Los Angeles Times:

At least 10 to 15 immigration attorneys have gathered at the Tom Bradley international terminal at LAX to help travelers, mostly from Iran, who have been detained, one of the attorneys said.

Attorneys have not yet been able to determine the number of fliers detained, as U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials are not allowing attorneys or families any communication with the detainees, said immigration attorney Jordan Cunnings.

“We’re literally walking around asking people, are you waiting for someone who has been detained?” said Cunnings, describing a scene of worried family members who had arrived bearing flowers and welcome signs for their loved ones.

Thanks to the suicidal immigration policy into Britain, one in seven young people presently living in Britain have glowing feelings towards the Muslim terrorist group ISIS.

Out of 2,000 adults asked by Populus, 14% of under-25s felt warmly and favourably about them and 12 percent of 25 to 34-year-olds thought positively of the head-chopping barbarians.

Breitbart:

They found that a tenth of all Londoners and one in 12 Scots gave Islamic State a score of between six and 10, implying a level of sympathy with the group. However, the terror group is most popular with people aged under 25, with 14 percent rating them between six and 10.Support for the group was also relatively high in Wales and the West Midlands, although is at its highest in London. Those over 45 were extremely unlikely to sympathise with the group, while the vast majority of the public overall have a negative opinion of the group with 88 percent ranking them zero to four.

Jonathan Githens-Mazer, an associate professor of Arabic and Islamic Studies at the University of Exeter, blamed it on people feeling let down by the government, rather than on ethnic loyalties from the hostile species deeply embedded within our midst.

He said that under-35s are especially sceptical of Britain’s political elite and were instead turning to blogs promoting “anti-political” ideas. He said: “There’s a big trend here, which is what happens to the state — and does the state matter any more? It fits in with British scepticism about the EU.”

Under-35s were also most likely to have a favourable view of Hamas and Hezbollah, while holding a bad view of Britain and America.

Dr Clive Field, who is director of the British Religion in Numbers project at the University of Manchester, added: “It does go some way toward explaining why we have actually got five British citizens going away looking for jihad every week and we have got at least 500 over there already.”

The reason why there are at least 5 ‘British’ citizens going to join ISIS each week is because people have loyalties to their own kith and kin, not to pieces of paper that tell them they are British.

Expecting them not to be Muslim terrorists because they can now call themselves ‘British’ is like expecting a wolf not to attack sheep because you have moved him into a sheep pen and are now calling him Larry the lamb.

It really is that stupid.

School teacher Jamshed Javeed who taught pupils at Sharples School in Bolton is further proof if any was ever needed that no matter how respectable a Muslim portrays themselves, no matter what job they have or anything else. They can not be trusted not to harbour extremist views. Moderate Muslims are few and far between.

Javeed was not just a secret Muslim terrorist sympathizer. He was a full blown ISIS supporter who had helped others travel to join ISIS and was himself planning on travelling to join the jihad. Reports suggest the terrorists family had known about his intentions and attempted to persuade him not to go. Thats all well and good them trying to stop him going, yet surely they have a moral and legal obligation to report him to the police yet never did. If i know that somebody is planning on committing murder and do nothing about it then i would be partly responsible in the eyes of the law as i could of stopped it happening. Why should his family be treated any different just because they are Muslims. They know he was going to become a terrorist yet did not report it so should face charges for aiding and abetting the wannabe jihadist. Even more so given the fact one of their other children has already died fighting for the the Islamic State terrorists

His job as a Chemistry teacher came with a great responsibility and allowed him access to school children who often are impressionable and would hold their teacher in high regard. Taking on board things they are told by them with out questioning it. More worryingly given Bolton’s high number of Muslims, chances are many of the pupils he taught in class would also have been Muslims.  Who knows how many of them his views have radicalised.

ABC News:

A British chemistry teacher accused of supporting the Islamic State group faced jail after he pleaded guilty Monday to terrorism charges.

Jamshed Javeed admitted two counts of engaging in conduct in preparation of terrorist acts. He accepted that he intended to travel to Syria to join rebels fighting against President Bashar Assad’s government.

The 30-year-old was arrested in December by counterterror police, who said Javeed had been “an otherwise law-abiding man” who began to support the Islamic State group last summer.

Javeed was accused of making travel plans with the intention of committing terrorism, and intending to help other terrorists by providing funding and buying equipment.

He will be sentenced in December.

Britain’s head of counterterrorism, Mark Rowley, warned earlier this month of an unusually high number of U.K. terrorism cases, many related to Syria, and highlighted the increasing risk of young and impressionable people being radicalized online. Police have charged at least 16 people returning from the country for terrorist activity this year.

Also Monday, the brother of a British man who was killed fighting in Syria appeared in court charged with trying to help would-be terrorists. Mustakim Jaman, 23, is alleged to have given others advice on how to travel to Syria without being detected.

Jaman, who was arrested Sunday, is due for a court hearing on Nov. 14.

The brother of a Muslim fanatic who died in Syria after bragging about his ‘5-star jihad’ has been charged with preparing to carry out terrorist acts.

Mustakim Jaman, 23, was arrested, along with his parents after police raided their Portsmouth home last week.

His brother, Ifthekar Jaman, 23, died last year in a battlefield clash 2,000 miles from his Hampshire home last December after declaring he was ready to die a martyr.

He became one of the most infamous British extremists when he boasted on BBC Newsnight that the ‘holy war’ in Syria was like ‘5-star jihad’ because of its ‘relaxing’ nature.

Mustakim Jaman went on Newsnight to defend his brother, saying he died ‘doing a good deed’ and was always trying to be the ‘best Muslim’ he could.

He was arrested by the south-east counter-terrorism unit on 14 October on suspicion of being involved in a Syria-related terrorism plot.

The 23-year-old was remanded in custody to appear at Westminster magistrates court in London tomorrow.

He was arrested by the south-east counter-terrorism unit on 14 October on suspicion of being involved in a Syria-related terrorism plot.

The 23-year-old was remanded in custody to appear at Westminster magistrates court in London tomorrow.

Jaman was arrested alongside his brother, Tuhim, 26, and his parents, Enu Miah, 57, and mother, Hena Choudhury.

His parents were released on bail on 15 October.

Jaman’s 29-year-old sister Tamannah Shaharin, was also arrested in Greenwich, south east London.

Read More

Zale Thompson has been named as the ax-wielding maniac who tried to kill four NYPD officers in Queens on October 23. You can watch the insane video of the attack above. Thompson managed to injure two of the cops before being shot dead by the other two.

Here’s what we know so far:

1. Thompson Wielded an 18-Inch Ax & Never Said a Word

The bloody hatchet used in Thompson’s attack on police officers. (NYPD)

Thompson was shot dead on Jamaica Avenue near 162nd Street in Queens after he attacked a group of cops with an 18-inch ax as the officers posed for a photo. DNA Info reports a freelance photographer had approached the foot-patrol officers and asked to take their picture.

Thompson attacked them without saying a word, according to witnesses. Officer Kenneth Healey, 25, suffered a severe wound to the head, and Officer Joseph Meeker, 24, was injured in the arm. Both are rookies in the NYPD.

2. He Was Discharged From the Navy & Was a ‘Proponent of Black Power’

(Facebook)

CNN reports that Thompson was discharged from the Navy and that he had a criminal record in California. His Navy discharge was related to misconduct.

According to his Facebook page, Thompson is a native of Queens who graduated in 2011 from the Teachers College at Columbia University. His page also says he attended the The College of New Rochelle and High School of Graphic Communications Arts. His last-known address was in East New York, Brooklyn, but the New York Post reports that he had moved to Jamaica, Queens, this year. Neighbors called him “weird” and said he constantly fought with his girlfriend and mother while he lived in Brooklyn.

He is 32 years old. On his LinkedIn page, Thompson lists his skills as Microsoft Office, public speaking and research. A source told the New York Post that Thompson was “very educated” and was a proponent of “black power.”

On his Facebook page, he also went by the name Zaim Farouq Abdul-malik.

3. Zale Wrote About Jihad & Guerilla Warfare & Wanted to ‘Rise Up’ Against the Government

In the comments section under this video, Zale Thompson wrote:

If you’re looking for “perfect” muslims who never make any mistakes in
their Jihad, then you will be looking in vain! If the Zionists and the
Crusaders had never invaded and colonized the Islamic lands after WW1, then
there would be no need for Jihad! Which is better, to sit around and do
nothing, or to Jihad fisabeelallah!

In the comments section under a YouTube posting of the song “No White God” by Sizzla,Thompson writes:

It’s ok for white people to draw pictures of a white jesus, and then colonize Africa, and enslave the negro in America, wipe out the native American, and invade the middle east. They call black people racist for rejecting the oppression they suffered from whites. Listen, when black people have colonized the entire continent of Europe, enslaved its people, and sold them into bondage to foreign lands, then you can call them racist.

Zale Thompson’s friend, Frank Francois. (Facebook)

One of Thompson’s friends, Frank Sha Francois, told The Daily News:

He never expressed, to me, that I could recall, that he would do anything violent. Yes he said there were things that needed to be done, non-violent, collective action. We spoke against all aspects of any type of terrorism — foreign terrorism, domestic terrorism, terrorism committed by groups and by governments; any act of violence where innocent lives were spilled. We spoke against that.

However, in one Facebook post, Thompson wrote:

Helicopters, big military will be useless on their own soil. They will not be able to defeat our people if we use guerrilla warfare. Attack their weak flanks.

ABC New York reports that Thompson has “a long history of filled with what sources describe as hate speech aimed at what he apparently saw as the white government power structure in America, suggesting it was time to rise up in opposition.”

Read More

The Cameron regime’s Home Secretary Theresa May has capitalized on the fears of home-grown Muslim terrorism to change existing laws to silence groups that are critical of our fake democracy.

She has defined ‘extremist activities’ as anything that is aimed at ‘overthrowing democracy,’ which includes just about every group that is critical of the current status quo.

She also came up with a new nonsensical phrase to describe these groups – ‘non-violent extremists’ – whatever that means.

Surely, if a group is non-violent, then they cannot be classed as extremist?

She has also made a point of linking Neo-Nazis with Muslim terrorists, whereas the only thing in common between the two groups is that they are both critical of Jews.

If people had any sense, they would realize that by doing this she is confirming that these new laws are for the benefit of the Jews, no one else.

She is basically saying that anyone who disagrees with our new Jewish definition of democracy is an extremist and needs to be silenced.

Guardian:

Radical Islamist extremists and neo-Nazis could be banned from making public appearances including on television under a gagging order proposed by the Conservatives with echoes of the broadcast ban that once applied to the voice of Gerry Adams.

Theresa May will announce the measure as part of a widely drawn counter-extremism strategy that is intended to catch so-called hate preachers such as Anjem Choudary, who was released on bail last week after being arrested on suspicion of encouraging terrorism.

The home secretary’s new orders would be aimed at those who undertake activities “for the purpose of overthrowing democracy”, a wide-ranging definition that could also catch a far wider range of political activists.

The “extremist asbos” are reminiscent of the 1980s broadcasting ban under which Sinn Féin spokesmen such as Adams were banned from the airwaves. Actors were used to voice the words of republicans and others with links to paramilitary groups in news reports.

May will also set out proposals to ban non-violent extremist groups that fall short of the current threshold for being banned as terrorist-related organisations.

The strategy is based on proposals that came out of David Cameron’s extremism working party set up following the murder of Lee Rigby in May last year.

The moves to ban extremist but non-violent groups and to introduce extremist asbos were blocked by the Liberal Democrats on freedom of speech grounds and so were not announced when Cameron proposed measures to tackle British jihadists travelling to Syria.

May will announce during the home affairs debate at the Tory conference that the new powers will be included in the party’s manifesto for next year’s election.

In the debate, May and Chris Grayling, the justice secretary, will reaffirm their hostility to the European court of human rights and the Human Rights Act. Grayling will renew his pledge that Britain’s supreme court will no longer be overruled by Strasbourg.

He will also highlight his recent next-term commitment to set up a network of specialist mental health centres in prisons across England and Wales.

May’s extremist disruption civil orders would contain wide-ranging restrictions on individuals who “undertake harmful activities” to spread, incite or justify hatred against people on grounds of race, religion, sexual orientation or disability.

The orders would be issued by a high court judge on an application from the police on the lower legal test of “balance of probabilities” rather than the stronger test of “beyond reasonable doubt”.

The restrictions are expected to include banning individuals from speaking at public events, protests and meetings, having to inform the police in advance of any public event, protest or meeting that they plan to attend, and banning individuals from particular public locations.

So if they think there is a possibility that you might say something they don’t like, they can silence you before you even say it.

Even more alarming is the way a sentence about putting ‘specialist mental health centres in prisons’ has been stuck in there amongst the new speech restrictions.

It looks like they may be intending to give that specialist mental health treatment to all those who disagree with their genocidal agenda.

A Clockwork Orange, anyone?

An Islamic terrorist has stopped Britain deporting him – by refusing to give his name for 21 years.

A judge ruled that the Algerian is a ‘trusted and senior’ member of a violent terrorist group and has helped suspects abroad.

But his lawyers have used human rights laws to prevent the Government from throwing him out of this country.

Officials cannot draw up crucial paperwork guaranteeing his safety without knowing his true identity.

Meanwhile, taxpayers have been left to pick up the multi-million pound bill for his legal aid and months of NHS hospital care.

Astonishingly, the terrorist, known only as B, is free to walk the streets because his bail conditions were ‘relaxed’ to allow him to go swimming and worship at a mosque.

The legal stand-off provoked a furious response from a senior Tory who branded human rights laws ‘a farce.’

Dominic Raab, MP for Esher and Walton, said: ‘It is a damning indictment of the human rights farce in this country that this man has been able to run rings around the deportation system.

‘If a dangerous criminal or suspected terrorist can frustrate deportation, by spewing out human rights objections while refusing to give his name so the claims can be checked, it turns the system on its head.

‘Even the human rights lawyers should be embarrassed, it’s so ridiculous.’ The saga emerged in a recent court ruling when B tried to halt deportation proceedings. But judges struck out his appeal. His lawyers had said the failure to resolve the stand-off was a breach of his human right to an ‘effective remedy’ by the State to his legal limbo.

But the judges criticised the failure of the mystery man to identify himself as a ‘deliberate distortion of the evidence’.

They said his ‘manipulation of information, his contempt and abuse of process’ must not succeed because it would encourage others to ‘behave in a similar way’.

The terrorist arrived illegally in Britain in 1993. The Special Immigration Appeals Commission found he bought a satellite phone and airtime for extremists in Algeria and Chechnya in 2000.

The terrorist originally gave his name as Nolidoni, later claiming to be Pierre Dumond. Both identities were false. He then refused to identify himself, as his lawyers cited two sections of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Read More

When people are running around claiming things like this are a hoax, they really should think of the hurt they could be causing to the victim’s family if it wasn’t a hoax.

Why anyone would think the government needed to fake Muslims killing a White man, when it happens just about every day, I don’t know.

Yes it was strange that the mainstream news chose to show footage of the killer, but quite understandable, as the woman that filmed it had already shared it online before the Police could get to her and request her not to.

This was not without precedent anyway, as the same thing happened with the brutal murder of Muammar Gaddafi being shown.

It must be very hurtful having people doubt that your own son or husband has actually been killed, when they were murdered in such a horrific and public way.

I’m not sure that this is the best way to deal with it though.

Daily Mail:

A blogger who claimed the murder of soldier Lee Rigby was a hoax aimed at stirring up anti-Islam hatred was arrested in a 2am raid yesterday.

Christopher Spivey, 51, a tattoo artist from Rochford, Essex, was arrested on suspicion of harassment via social media after police raided his home and took away computer equipment.

Mr Spivey claimed in internet articles that he spent hours researching footage of Mr Rigby’s killing and the aftermath to ‘prove’ that the British establishment had faked the murder to incite hatred towards Muslims.

It is unclear whether the arrest was made in relation to these articles or another separate case, or cases, of alleged harassment.

In a rambling post uploaded to his blog on Tuesday, Mr Spivey claims that there are eight seconds of footage ‘missing’ from the CCTV footage that captured the death of Drummer Rigby, who was run down and then hacked to death in Woolwich, London, in May last year.

He goes on to discuss his theory in extensive detail, sharing ‘calculations’ that he has made of the speed that the car was travelling at when it hit Lee Rigby.

This logic, among other suggestions, shows that the brutal murder was in fact a ‘hoax’, he claims.

Police involved in the investigation would neither confirm nor deny whether the alleged harassment was connected to Lee Rigby’s mother Lyn Rigby and stepfather Ian Rigby, who live in Middleton, Manchester.

Among Mr Spivey’s online supporters are David Icke, the former footballer and BBC Grandstand presenter who has become known for his conspiracy theories.

Mr Spivey was being held in custody yesterday in Southend, Essex after his arrest, which came about when officers from Essex Police acted on a referral from Greater Manchester Police.

He has since been released on police bail pending further inquiries until September 5.

An Essex Police spokeswoman said: ‘A 51-year-old man from Rochford was arrested by Essex Police on suspicion of harassment in the early hours of Wednesday, July 30.

In an interview for BBC Radio 4′s The World This Weekend, Cressida Dick, the Metropolitan Police’s assistant commissioner and head of specialist operations, warned that Britain would feel the long-term consequences of the current Syrian conflict that is now spilling over into Iraq, stating: “I’m afraid I believe that we will be living with the consequences of Syria – from a terrorist point of view, let alone the world, geopolitical consequences – for many, many, many years to come”

With estimates of British based Islamic militants currently participating in the Syrian conflict and the invasion of Iraq by ISIS forces citing numbers in excess of 500 and with previous admissions by security services that upwards of 2,000 British based militants have received military training and have gained battlefield experience in Afghanistan, we now face the a threat to Britain’s national security greater than anything since World War Two.

When we consider that during the 1980’s at the height of the troubles in Northern Ireland, it has been estimated that the Provisional IRA had just 300 men in active service units with a further 450 in support roles, the potential threat to Britain of several thousand military trained and battle hardened Islamic Jihadists within our midst should not be underestimated.

In the immediate aftermath of World War Two as British servicemen returned to from war, many found it difficult re-adjust to civilian life and there was a period of heightened violent crime caused by men who had grown used to settling issues through the use of force. This occurred even though we had a largely homogenous population in the late 1940s and the returning soldiers had no ethnic or religious grievances that might inflame their aggression.

Where returning Jihadists fighters are concerned however, they are overwhelmingly of alien racial, religious and ethnic backgrounds when compared with the indigenous British. As people of second and third generation immigrant stock, they have been educated to believe that their forebears were abused by British conquerors during the time of the British Empire; they have been educated to believe that their parents generation have been unfairly discriminated against and subjected to intolerable racism since immigrating to Britain; they have seen British soldiers and airmen participating with American led coalition forces in abortive wars involving the invasion and partial conquest of several Islamic nations, causing arguably the unnecessary deaths of hundreds of thousands of their co-religionists; and they have been persuaded by extremist Islamic clerics to believe that violent Jihad involving the pitiless slaughter of one’s religious enemies is both just and noble, and demanded of them by their God.

Clearly, the potential for radicalised Islamic fighters returning from war in the Middle East to participate in acts of terrorism against the British people and against the British state could hardly be stronger and given all of this, any sane politician would argue that all British based Jihadists should have their British passports and British citizenship revoked so they cannot return to this country. Furthermore, upon their return, they should be placed under arrest until they can be deemed safe to be released.

Sadly, words of warning such as those emanating from Cressida Dick, betray a decidedly different intention on the part of our current government, as the returning militants will only pose the kind of threat that Miss Dick describes if they are at liberty.

It is stated by government spokespeople that some returning Jihadists have been arrested and questioned and that they will be monitored by our security services, but given the large numbers of Jihadists involved and the fact that some of both the 7/7 bombers and the killers of Lee Rigby were supposedly under surveillance by the security services, the announcement of such measures does not fill one with confidence, especially when the best efforts of the British Army and our security services proved ultimately ineffective against the much smaller Provisional IRA.

What is more galling to learn is that the British and American governments have both contributed to the training and arming of ISIS fighters at training camps in Jordan, with the intention of assisting them in deposing Syria’s Bashir al-Assad. They are clearly a force that our own governments have contributed significantly towards the founding of, in their incompetent meddling in other nations affairs.

It is also widely believed that both the governments of Saudi Arabia and Qatar have also been funding and arming the anti-government Jihadists in Syria and that ISIS now have more than $1billion dollars funds they have either stolen, extorted or been donated. Also, more recently, it has been revealed that leading figures from within Saddam Hussein’s former regime have joined forces with ISIS. They’ve never had it so good and they clearly pose a most potent threat to the peoples of Europe.

If ISIS are successful in establishing a Sunni Islamic caliphate in Iraq, this will provide them with a base from which to launch further terrorist attacks upon Western and Middle Eastern targets. However if they are not successful, then they will return to Britain and no doubt many of them will wish to make our nation pay for our part in bringing about their failure.

Does anyone want to take bets on how long after the end of this current war in Iraq it will be before Jihadist militants bring bombs and bullets to the streets of London and our other major towns and cities?

The time to act is now, before it is too late.

WARNING GRAPHIC CONTENT – The following is a video showing ISIS killers hunting down unarmed Iraqis fleeing their advance:

A young British Muslim who fled his suburban upbringing and travelled abroad to become a fanatical terrorist can today be unmasked by The Mail on Sunday.

London-born Ismail Jabbar, 22, is fighting for the ‘Unit Bin Laden’ of violent Islamic extremists in Syria, where he boasts of killing his enemies.

A former trainee with the House of Fraser store, he also incites fellow Muslims to murder soldiers, police officers and unbelievers back in Britain.

He disappeared from the UK nine months ago and smuggled himself into the war-ravaged country as a Kalashnikov-wielding jihadist who revels in bloodshed and has used a series of aliases to hide his true identity.

He is the only known British extremist to give a full account of fighting in Syria.

MI5 and the police have been monitoring his movements via the series of extreme online posts he has made on websites such as Twitter, Facebook and Ask.fm.

The Mail on Sunday has been told that this self-proclaimed terrorist and murderer will be arrested if he ever returns to the UK for inciting extremism as well as travelling abroad to commit terrorist acts.

Evidence of his extremism, compiled by this newspaper, include:

• Posting graphic images of ‘enemies’ he claims his group has killed, including a severed head and body parts, and one of himself apparently standing on a corpse in uniform.
• Inciting fellow British Muslims to launch ‘lone-wolf’ style attacks like that on soldier Lee Rigby, who was hacked to death outside his barracks in Woolwich, South London.
• Defending the two murderers of Rigby and urging followers to ‘clench a knife… and go stab a soldier’ or ‘chop couple pig heads in the streets of London’, believed to be a reference to the police.
• Justifying attacks on UK civilians as well as urging bomb attacks on targets like petrol stations.
• Fighting for a notorious Al Qaeda-linked group called Al-Nusra Front, and encouraging friends to leave the UK and join him for jihad.

To the horror of his parents – who are begging him to return to Britain – Jabbar has said that he wants to die in Syria as a ‘shaheed’ [martyr], while attempting to create an Islamic state with strict sharia law.

A family source said: ‘It’s been very stressful. No father or mother should have to go through this. I pray for every mother and father who have lost their son like us. I pray for them to come back.’

After telling friends he was travelling to Syria as part of an aid convoy, Jabbar trained with terrorists and has now formed his own group, the Unit Bin Laden, amid the chaos of a bloody civil war that has already cost more than 150,000 lives.

Jabbar’s case has come to light as David Cameron prepares to tighten the law so that more British jihadis will face prosecution for committing terrorist acts overseas.

The law change – to be announced in the Queen’s Speech this week – is in response to fears that Britons becoming radicalised in countries such as Syria present the greatest threat to Britain’s national security.

Read More